Indeterminate results of QuantiFERON-TB Gold in-tube due to high nil concentration and methodological exploration and improvement

A Retrospective Study of Factors Contributing to the Performance of an Interferon-Gamma Release Assay Blood Test for Tuberculosis Infection

BACKGROUND

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a significant global health concern. Accurate detection of latent TB infection is crucial for effective control and prevention. We aimed to assess the performance of an interferon-gamma release assay blood test (QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus [QFT-Plus]) in various clinical contexts and identify conditions that affect its results.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 31 000 QFT-Plus samples collected from 26 000 subjects at a tertiary hospital in South Korea over a 4-year period and compared the rates of positivity and indeterminate results across diverse clinical situations. We also analysed the contribution of the QuantiFERON TB2 tube to the test's sensitivity and determined optimal cutoff values for 3 hematologic parameters to distinguish false-negative results. These cutoff values were validated in a separate cohort of subjects with microbiologically confirmed subclinical TB.

RESULTS

Rates of QFT-Plus positivity and indeterminate results were disparate across diagnoses. The TB2 tube increased QFT-Plus sensitivity by 4.1% (95% CI, 1.1%-7.0%) in patients with subclinical TB. Absolute lymphocyte count ≤1.19 × 109/L, absolute neutrophil count ≥5.88 × 109/L, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio ≥4.33 were effective criteria to discriminate false-negative QFT-Plus results. Application of the hematologic criteria, individually or combined with mitogen response <10 IU/mL, substantially improved performance in the main study cohort and the validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings highlight the influence of clinical context and patient hematologic profiles on QFT-Plus results. To minimise neglected latent TB infections due to false-negative QFT-Plus results, serial retesting is advisable in patients with severe lymphopenia or neutrophilia, particularly when the mitogen response is <10 IU/mL.

Increased rates of indeterminate results in QuantiFERON-TB gold in-tube during the COVID-19 epidemic in Hunan province, China

Increased rates of indeterminate QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) results have been reported since the COVID-19 epidemic in Hunan Province, China. The indeterminate result (ITR) rate of QFT increased from an average of 5.2% to 12.4%, paralleling the first COVID-19 pandemic wave in the region. QFT-GIT results of 243 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 from January 2022 to April 2023 at Xiangya Hospital of Central South University were analyzed. Of the 243 patients, 71 (29.2%) had ITRs due to reduced interferon-gamma production in the positive control. Multiple factors are associated with ITRs, such as disease severity, respiratory failure incidence, immunosuppressant use, and prognosis. Additionally, interferon-gamma (Mitogen-Nil) levels differed significantly depending upon disease severity, prognosis, immunosuppressant use, sepsis symptoms, respiratory failure, or hyperlipidemia. An abnormal increase in the ITR rate in the QFT was observed after the COVID-19 pandemic, and an optimal machine learning predictive model for indeterminate QFT results was established.

Exploration and improvement of QuantiFERON-TB assay in patients with indeterminate results in clinical practice: A head-to-head study

BACKGROUND

We implemented the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) based on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (QFT-PBMCs) and QFT Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) in patients with indeterminate results, and use Mit-Nil value to identify false negatives and impaired cellular immunity.

METHODS

One hundred seventy-one out of 2480 patients who had a QFT-GIT test were prospectively recruited and classified as high Nil (n = 35), low Mit (n = 75) and control (n = 61) cohorts. Head-to-head comparisons, i.e., QFT-PBMCs vs. QFT-GIT in high Nil cohort, QFT-Plus vs. QFT-GIT in low Mit cohort, and QFT-PBMCs vs. QFT-GIT in controls, were performed. Lymphocyte subsets counts were conducted in low Mit and control cohorts.

RESULTS

A significant reduction of positive rate only occurred in Mit-Nil < 6 IU/ml (p < 0.001). QFT-PBMCs yielded 100 % valid results and had a significant Nil decline in high Nil cohort (0.98 ± 1.06 vs. 9.55 ± 0.64 IU/ml, p < 0.0001), while correlated well with QFT-GIT for qualitative (Cohen's k = 0.93) and quantitative (TB-Ag [R2 = 0.91] and Mit [R2 = 0.94]) analyses. QFT-Plus produced 61.3 % valid results and had a significant Mit increase in low Mit cohort (0.82 ± 0.95 vs. 0.17 ± 0.11 IU/ml, p < 0.0001). Mit-Nil value significantly correlated with lymphocyte subsets counts (R:0.49-0.56, p < 0.0001), separately corresponding to thresholds of 4.26, 5.33, 5.55 and 5.81 IU/ml for predicting decreased total lymphocyte, T lymphocyte, CD4+ and CD8+ cells.

CONCLUSIONS

QFT that replacing whole blood with PBMCs should be recommended to handle high Nil samples, and QFT-Plus can declined the frequency of low Mit results. In addition, Mit-Nil < 6 and 5.81 IU/ml are potential thresholds to identify the risk of false negatives and impaired cellular immunity, respectively.