Mechanistic dissection unmasks colibactin as a prevalent mutagenic driver of cancer

Gut microbiota alterations in colorectal adenoma-carcinoma sequence based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Most sporadic colorectal cancers (CRC) develop through the adenoma-carcinoma sequence. While dysbiosis of the intestinal flora contributes to CRC's pathogenesis, precise microbial taxa closely associated with the colorectal adenoma-carcinoma sequence remain elusive. This meta-analysis aimed to summarize the features of intestinal flora in patients with AD and CRC.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for case-control studies comparing the relative abundance of gut microbiota in the feces of patients with AD, CRC, and healthy controls (HC) from inception to January 2024. The weighted mean difference (WMD) with a 95 % confidence interval (CI) was used to display the results. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of the entailed literature. Publication bias was evaluated with the Egger's and Begg's tests.

RESULTS

Eleven studies were included, involving 477 CRC patients, 628 AD patients, and 864 healthy controls. Compared with HC, the patients with AD had a significantly lower Chao 1 index (WMD = -30.17, 95 % CI [-41.10, -19.23], P < 0.001) and Shannon index (WMD = -0.11 95 % CI [-0.18, -0.04], P = 0.002). Compared with AD, the CRC patients had a significantly higher Chao1 index (WMD = 22.09, 95 % CI [7.59, 36.00], P = 0.003) and Shannon index (WMD = 0.08, 95 % CI [0.00, 0.15], P = 0.037). Enterobacteriaceae (WMD = 0.03 95 % CI [0.00,0.05], P = 0.047; WMD = 0.02 95 % CI [0.00,0.04], P = 0.027) significantly increased in the order of Control-AD-CRC, while that of Blautia (WMD = -0.00 95 % CI [-0.01, -0.00], P = 0.001; WMD = -0.00 95 % CI [-0.00, -0.00], P = 0.002) was reduced. Compared with HC, the relative abundance of Proteobacteria (WMD = 0.05 95 % CI [0.03,0.07], P < 0.001), Fusobacteria (WMD = 0.02 95 % CI [0.00,0.03], P = 0.042), Streptococcaceae (WMD = 0.03 95 % CI [0.01,0.05], P = 0.017), Prevotellaceae (WMD = 0.02 95 % CI [0.00,0.04], P = 0.040), and Escherichia-Shigella (WMD = 0.06 95 % CI [0.01, 0.11], P = 0.021) was enriched in the CRC group. The relative abundance of Alistipes (WMD = 0.00 95 % CI [0.00,0.01], P = 0.032) and Streptococcus (WMD = 0.00 95 % CI [0.00,0.00], P = 0.001) was increased in the AD vs HC. The relative abundance of Firmicutes (WMD = -0.07 95 % CI [-0.12, -0.03], P = 0.003), Bifidobacteria (WMD = -0.03 95 % CI [-0.05, -0.01], P = 0.016), and Klebsiella (WMD = -0.01 95 % CI [-0.01, -0.00], P = 0.001) was decreased in the CRC vs HC. Compared with AD, the relative abundance of Firmicutes (WMD = -0.04 95 % CI [-0.07, -0.02], P = 0.002), Peptostreptococcaceae (WMD = -0.03 95 % CI [-0.05, -0.00], P = 0.021), Lachnospiraceae (WMD = -0.04 95 % CI [-0.08,-0.00], P = 0.037), Ruminococcaceae (WMD = -0.06 95 % CI [-0.09,-0.03], P < 0.001), Faecalibacterium (WMD = -0.01 95 % CI [-0.02, -0.01], P = 0.001), and Lachnoclostridium (WMD = -0.02 95 % CI [-0.03, -0.00], P = 0.040) was decreased in the CRC group, while Proteobacteria (WMD = 0.04 95 % CI [0.02,0.05], P < 0.001) was increased.

CONCLUSIONS

The dysbiosis characterized by reduced levels of short-chain fatty acid (SCFA)-producing bacteria, decreased anti-inflammatory bacteria, increased pro-inflammatory bacteria, and an elevation of bacteria with cytotoxic effects damaging to DNA may represent the specific microbial signature of colorectal adenoma/carcinoma. Further research is required to elucidate the mechanisms by which gut dysbiosis leads to the progression from AD to CRC and to explore the potential of specific microbiota markers in clinical treatment and non-invasive screening.

Polyketide synthase positive Escherichia coli one-time measurement in stool is not informative of colorectal cancer risk in a screening setting

Environmental factors like the pathogenicity island polyketide synthase positive (pks+) Escherichia coli (E. coli) could have potential for risk stratification in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. The association between pks+ E. coli measured in fecal immunochemical test (FIT) samples and the detection of advanced neoplasia (AN) at colonoscopy was investigated. Biobanked FIT samples were analyzed for both presence of E. coli and pks+ E. coli and correlated with colonoscopy findings; 5020 CRC screening participants were included. Controls were participants in which no relevant lesion was detected because of FIT-negative results (cut-off ≥15 μg Hb/g feces), a negative colonoscopy, or a colonoscopy during which only a nonadvanced polyp was detected. Cases were participants with AN [CRC, advanced adenoma (AA), or advanced serrated polyp (ASP)]. Existing DNA isolation and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) procedures were used for the detection of E. coli and pks+ E. coli in stool. A total of 4542 (90.2%) individuals were E. coli positive, and 1322 (26.2%) were pks+ E. coli positive. The prevalence of E. coli in FIT samples from individuals with AN was 92.9% compared to 89.7% in FIT samples of controls (p = 0.010). The prevalence of pks+ E. coli in FIT samples from individuals with AN (28.6%) and controls (25.9%) was not significantly different (p = 0.13). The prevalences of pks+ E. coli in FIT samples from individuals with CRC, AA, or ASP were 29.6%, 28.3%, and 32.1%, respectively. In conclusion, the prevalence of pks+ E. coli in a screening population was 26.2% and did not differ significantly between individuals with AN and controls. These findings disqualify the straightforward option of using a snapshot measurement of pks+ E. coli in FIT samples as a stratification biomarker for CRC risk. © 2024 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

The microbial landscape of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a substantial source of global morbidity and mortality in dire need of improved prevention and treatment strategies. As our understanding of CRC grows, it is becoming increasingly evident that the gut microbiota, consisting of trillions of microorganisms in direct interface with the colon, plays a substantial role in CRC development and progression. Understanding the roles that individual microorganisms and complex microbial communities play in CRC pathogenesis, along with their attendant mechanisms, will help yield novel preventive and therapeutic interventions for CRC. In this Review, we discuss recent evidence concerning global perturbations of the gut microbiota in CRC, associations of specific microorganisms with CRC, the underlying mechanisms by which microorganisms potentially drive CRC development and the roles of complex microbial communities in CRC pathogenesis. While our understanding of the relationship between the microbiota and CRC has improved in recent years, our findings highlight substantial gaps in current research that need to be filled before this knowledge can be used to the benefit of patients.

The microbial genotoxin colibactin exacerbates mismatch repair mutations in colorectal tumors

Certain Enterobacteriaceae strains contain a 54-kb biosynthetic gene cluster referred to as "pks" encoding the biosynthesis of a secondary metabolite, colibactin. Colibactin-producing E. coli promote colorectal cancer (CRC) in preclinical models, and in vitro induce a specific mutational signature that is also detected in human CRC genomes. Yet, how colibactin exposure affects the mutational landscape of CRC in vivo remains unclear. Here we show that colibactin-producing E. coli-driven colonic tumors in mice have a significantly higher SBS burden and a larger percentage of these mutations can be attributed to a signature associated with mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd; SBS15), compared to tumors developed in the presence of colibactin-deficient E. coli. We found that the synthetic colibactin 742 but not an inactive analog 746 causes DNA damage and induces transcriptional activation of p53 and senescence signaling pathways in non-transformed human colonic epithelial cells. In MMRd colon cancer cells (HCT 116), chronic exposure to 742 resulted in the upregulation of BRCA1, Fanconi anemia, and MMR signaling pathways as revealed by global transcriptomic analysis. This was accompanied by increased T>N single-base substitutions (SBS) attributed to the proposed pks+E. coli signature (SBS88), reactive oxygen species (SBS17), and mismatch-repair deficiency (SBS44). A significant co-occurrence between MMRd SBS44 and pks-associated SBS88 signature was observed in a large cohort of human CRC patients (n=2,945), and significantly more SBS44 mutations were found when SBS88 was also detected. Collectively, these findings reveal the host response mechanisms underlying colibactin genotoxic activity and suggest that colibactin may exacerbate MMRd-associated mutations.

Exploiting lactic acid bacteria for colorectal cancer: a recent update

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the world. Currently, chemotherapy and radiotherapy used to treat CRC exhibit many side effects, hence, it is an urgent need to design effective therapies to prevent and treat CRC. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) can regulate gut microbiota, intestinal immunity, and intestinal mechanical barrier, which is becoming a hot product for the prevention and treatment of CRC, whereas comprehensive reviews of their anti-CRC mechanisms are limited. This review systematically reveals the latest incidence, mortality, risk factors, and molecular mechanisms of CRC, then summarizes the roles of probiotics in alleviating CRC in animal and clinical studies and critically reviews the possible mechanisms by which these interventions exert their activities. It then shows the limitations in mechanisms and clinical studies, and the suggestions for future research are also put forward, which will play an important role in guiding and promoting the basic and clinical research of remising CRC by LAB and the development of LAB products.

Tackling the Threat of Cancer Due to Pathobionts Producing Colibactin: Is Mesalamine the Magic Bullet?

Colibactin is a genotoxin produced primarily by Escherichia coli harboring the genomic pks island (pks⁺ E. coli). Pks⁺ E. coli cause host cell DNA damage, leading to chromosomal instability and gene mutations. The signature of colibactin-induced mutations has been described and found in human colorectal cancer (CRC) genomes. An inflamed intestinal environment drives the expansion of pks⁺ E. coli and promotes tumorigenesis. Mesalamine (i.e., 5-aminosalycilic acid), an effective anti-inflammatory drug, is an inhibitor of the bacterial polyphosphate kinase (PPK). This drug not only inhibits the production of intestinal inflammatory mediators and the proliferation of CRC cells, but also limits the abundance of E. coli in the gut microbiota and diminishes the production of colibactin. Here, we describe the link between intestinal inflammation and colorectal cancer induced by pks⁺ E. coli. We discuss the potential mechanisms of the pleiotropic role of mesalamine in treating both inflammatory bowel diseases and reducing the risk of CRC due to pks⁺ E. coli.