Advances in Ventricular Arrhythmia Ablation for Brugada Syndrome

A narrative review of inherited arrhythmogenic syndromes in young population: role of genetic diagnosis in exercise recommendations

Sudden cardiac death is a rare but socially devastating event, especially if occurs in young people. Usually, this unexpected lethal event occurs during or just after exercise. One of the leading causes of sudden cardiac death is inherited arrhythmogenic syndromes, a group of genetic entities characterised by incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity. Exercise can be the trigger for malignant arrhythmias and even syncope in population with a genetic predisposition, being sudden cardiac death as the first symptom. Due to genetic origin, family members must be clinically assessed and genetically analysed after diagnosis or suspected diagnosis of a cardiac channelopathy. Early identification and adoption of personalised preventive measures is crucial to reduce risk of arrhythmias and avoid new lethal episodes. Despite exercise being recommended by the global population due to its beneficial effects on health, particular recommendations for these patients should be adopted considering the sport practised, level of demand, age, gender, arrhythmogenic syndrome diagnosed but also genetic diagnosis. Our review focuses on the role of genetic background in sudden cardiac death during exercise in child and young population.

Advances and Challenges in the Management of Brugada Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review

Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an inherited arrhythmogenic disorder marked by distinctive ST-segment elevations on electrocardiograms (ECG) and an increased risk of sudden cardiac death. Characterized by mutations primarily in the SCN5A gene, BrS disrupts cardiac ion channel function, leading to abnormal electrical activity and arrhythmias. Although BrS primarily affects young, healthy males, it poses significant diagnostic challenges due to its often concealed or intermittent ECG manifestations and clinical presentation that can mimic other cardiac disorders. Current management strategies focus on symptom control and prevention of sudden death, with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) serving as the primary intervention for high-risk patients. However, the complications associated with ICDs and the lack of effective pharmacological options necessitate a cautious and personalized approach. Recent advancements in catheter ablation have shown promise, particularly for managing ventricular fibrillation (VF) storms and reducing ICD shocks. Additionally, pharmacological treatments such as quinidine have been effective in specific cases, though their use is limited by availability and side effects. This review highlights significant gaps in the BrS literature, particularly in terms of long-term management and novel therapeutic approaches. The importance of genetic screening and tailored treatment strategies to better identify and manage at-risk individuals is emphasized. The review aims to enhance the understanding of BrS and improve patient outcomes, advocating for a multidisciplinary approach to this complex syndrome.

Electrocardiographic temporo-spatial assessment of depolarization and repolarization changes after epicardial arrhythmogenic substrate ablation in Brugada syndrome

Aims

In Brugada syndrome (BrS), with spontaneous or ajmaline-induced coved ST elevation, epicardial electro-anatomic potential duration maps (epi-PDMs) were detected on a right ventricle (RV) outflow tract (RVOT), an arrhythmogenic substrate area (AS area), abolished by epicardial-radiofrequency ablation (EPI-AS-RFA). Novel CineECG, projecting 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) waveforms on a 3D heart model, previously localized depolarization forces in RV/RVOT in BrS patients. We evaluate 12-lead ECG and CineECG depolarization/repolarization changes in spontaneous type-1 BrS patients before/after EPI-AS-RFA, compared with normal controls.

Methods and results

In 30 high-risk BrS patients (93% males, age 37 + 9 years), 12-lead ECGs and epi-PDMs were obtained at baseline, early after EPI-AS-RFA, and late follow-up (FU) (2.7-16.1 months). CineECG estimates temporo-spatial localization during depolarization (Early-QRS and Terminal-QRS) and repolarization (ST-Tpeak, Tpeak-Tend). Differences within BrS patients (baseline vs. early after EPI-AS-RFA vs. late FU) were analysed by Wilcoxon signed-rank test, while differences between BrS patients and 60 age-sex-matched normal controls were analysed by the Mann-Whitney test. In BrS patients, baseline QRS and QTc durations were longer and normalized after EPI-AS-ATC (151 ± 15 vs. 102 ± 13 ms, P < 0.001; 454 ± 40 vs. 421 ± 27 ms, P < 0.000). Baseline QRS amplitude was lower and increased at late FU (0.63 ± 0.26 vs. 0.84 ± 13 ms, P < 0.000), while Terminal-QRS amplitude decreased (0.24 ± 0.07 vs. 0.08 ± 0.03 ms, P < 0.000). At baseline, CineECG depolarization/repolarization wavefront prevalently localized in RV/RVOT (Terminal-QRS, 57%; ST-Tpeak, 100%; and Tpeak-Tend, 61%), congruent with the AS area on epi-PDM. Early after EPI-AS-RFA, RV/RVOT localization during depolarization disappeared, as Terminal-QRS prevalently localized in the left ventricle (LV, 76%), while repolarization still localized on RV/RVOT [ST-Tpeak (44%) and Tpeak-Tend (98%)]. At late FU, depolarization/repolarization forces prevalently localized in the LV (Terminal-QRS, 94%; ST-Tpeak, 63%; Tpeak-Tend, 86%), like normal controls.

Conclusion

CineECG and 12-lead ECG showed a complex temporo-spatial perturbation of both depolarization and repolarization in BrS patients, prevalently localized in RV/RVOT, progressively normalizing after epicardial ablation.