1
|
Nielsen FM, Klitgaard TL, Bruun NH, Møller MH, Schjørring OL, Rasmussen BS. Lower or higher oxygenation targets in the intensive care unit: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 2024; 50:1275-1286. [PMID: 38990335 PMCID: PMC11306534 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-024-07523-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2024] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Optimal oxygenation targets for patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in the intensive care unit (ICU) are not clearly defined due to substantial variability in design of previous trials. This study aimed to perform a pre-specified individual patient data meta-analysis of the Handling Oxygenation Targets in the ICU (HOT-ICU) and the Handling Oxygenation Targets in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (HOT-COVID) trials to compare targeting a partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2) of 8-12 kPa in adult ICU patients, assessing both benefits and harms. METHODS We assessed 90-day all-cause mortality and days alive without life support in 90 days using a generalised mixed model. Heterogeneity of treatment effects (HTE) was evaluated in 14 subgroups, and results graded using the Instrument to assess the Credibility of Effect Modification Analyses (ICEMAN). RESULTS At 90 days, mortality was 40.4% (724/1792) in the 8 kPa group and 40.9% (733/1793) in the 12 kPa group (risk ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-1.07; P = 0.80). No difference was observed in number of days alive without life support. Subgroup analyses indicated more days alive without life support in COVID-19 patients targeting 8 kPa (P = 0.04) (moderate credibility), and lower mortality (P = 0.03) and more days alive without life support (P = 0.02) in cancer-patients targeting 12 kPa (low credibility). CONCLUSION This study reported no overall differences comparing a PaO2 target of 8-12 kPa on mortality or days alive without life support in 90 days. Subgroup analyses suggested HTE in patients with COVID-19 (moderate credibility) and cancer (low credibility).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederik Mølgaard Nielsen
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-21, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark.
| | - Thomas L Klitgaard
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-21, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Niels Henrik Bruun
- Unit of Clinical Biostatistics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Morten H Møller
- Department of Intensive Care, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Olav L Schjørring
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-21, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Bodil S Rasmussen
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-21, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Parhar KKS, Soo A, Knight G, Fiest K, Niven DJ, Rubenfeld G, Scales D, Stelfox HT, Zuege DJ, Bagshaw S. Protocol and statistical analysis plan for the identification and treatment of hypoxemic respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome with protection, paralysis, and proning: A type-1 hybrid stepped-wedge cluster randomised effectiveness-implementation study. CRIT CARE RESUSC 2023; 25:207-215. [PMID: 38234326 PMCID: PMC10790012 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
Objective To describe a study protocol and statistical analysis plan (SAP) for the identification and treatment of hypoxemic respiratory failure (HRF) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with protection, paralysis, and proning (TheraPPP) study prior to completion of recruitment, electronic data retrieval, and analysis of any data. Design TheraPPP is a stepped-wedge cluster randomised study evaluating a care pathway for HRF and ARDS patients. This is a type-1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation study design evaluating both intervention effectiveness and implementation; however primarily powered for the effectiveness outcome. Setting Seventeen adult intensive care units (ICUs) across Alberta, Canada. Participants We estimate a sample size of 18816 mechanically ventilated patients, with 11424 patients preimplementation and 7392 patients postimplementation. We estimate 2688 sustained ARDS patients within our study cohort. Intervention An evidence-based, stakeholder-informed, multidisciplinary care pathway called Venting Wisely that standardises diagnosis and treatment of HRF and ARDS patients. Main outcome measures The primary outcome is 28-day ventilator-free days (VFDs). The primary analysis will compare the mean 28-day VFDs preimplementation and postimplementation using a mixed-effects linear regression model. Prespecified subgroups include sex, age, HRF, ARDS, COVID-19, cardiac surgery, body mass index, height, illness acuity, and ICU volume. Results This protocol and SAP are reported using the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials guidance and the Guidelines for the Content of Statistical Analysis Plans in Clinical Trials. The study received ethics approval and was registered (ClinicalTrials.gov-NCT04744298) prior to patient enrolment. Conclusions TheraPPP will evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of an HRF and ARDS care pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ken Kuljit S. Parhar
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary & Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Andrea Soo
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary & Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Gwen Knight
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary & Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kirsten Fiest
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary & Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Daniel J. Niven
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary & Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Gordon Rubenfeld
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto Ontario, Canada
| | - Damon Scales
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto Ontario, Canada
| | - Henry T. Stelfox
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary & Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Danny J. Zuege
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary & Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Critical Care Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sean Bagshaw
- Critical Care Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta and Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|