1
|
Mixer SJ, Smith JL, Brown ML, Lindley LC. Community-Academic Partnership: Intervention to Prepare Community Members for the End-of-Life Journey. J Hosp Palliat Nurs 2024; 26:41-48. [PMID: 37851963 DOI: 10.1097/njh.0000000000000995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
Despite research findings that rural Appalachians prefer to die at home, few people access palliative and hospice care services, and many report limited knowledge about palliative/end-of-life care resources. A community-academic partnership was formed to address this need. Train-the-trainer workshop and materials were co-developed. This study tested the feasibility and cultural acceptability of the training intervention to increase community members' knowledge about palliative/end-of-life care resources for East Tennessee Appalachian people. Community-based participatory research design and culture care theory guided the project, intervention, and research. After engaging in end-of-life training, participants completed a retrospective pretest-posttest survey. Paired samples t tests were used to compare knowledge before and after training. Means and standard deviations were used to report training material usefulness and cultural acceptability. Short-answer qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis. Sixty-six adults completed the survey. Ratings for training materials and cultural/theological acceptability were high. Participant knowledge rankings showed significant improvement after training at the P <.001 level. Qualitative feedback was positive. The training intervention was feasible, culturally acceptable, and effective for increasing East Tennessee Appalachian persons' palliative/end-of-life care knowledge. Community member expertise/collaboration integrated into every stage of the project is the bedrock of cultural acceptability and feasibility.
Collapse
|
2
|
Dignan M, Dwyer S, Cromo M, Geertz M, Bardhan R, Stockton E. Development and Evaluation of Patient Navigation Training for Rural and Appalachian Populations. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2023; 38:1077-1083. [PMID: 36396832 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-022-02234-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/30/2022] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
The Appalachian region of the USA includes 423 counties in 13 states positioned along the spine of the Appalachian Mountains stretching from New York to Mississippi. Approximately 42% of Appalachia is rural, and while the economy of Appalachia has diversified over the past two decades from reliance on agriculture and coal mining, 176 (41.6%) of the 423 counties are classified as economically distressed or at-risk. Patient navigation (PN) has been shown to be effective as an approach to address multiple barriers and enhance access to healthcare services, and yet there are no known PN programs focusing on the Appalachian population. This project was designed to develop, implement, and evaluate a curriculum and training program for PN for cancer prevention and control in Appalachia. The training program was developed through formative evaluation and offered daylong workshops that provided instruction in 60-90-min modules. Workshop topics included an introduction to PN, Appalachian culture, community needs assessment, communication, financial navigation, and navigation for screening and diagnostic follow-up for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers. A total of 20 workshops were conducted with 334 attendees. The workshops were evaluated using a mixed-method approach using pre- and posttests and participant evaluations. The overall mean posttest scores increased by 4% from pretest (p < 0.05). Evaluation also showed that attendees valued the focus on Appalachian culture and judged the content relevant and useful. Attendees also expressed interest in additional opportunities for similar workshops that expanded upon current topics and allowed for exploration of Appalachian health-related issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Dignan
- College of Medicine, Prevention Research Center, University of Kentucky, 760 Press Avenue, Room 335, Lexington, KY, 40536-0679, USA.
| | - Sharon Dwyer
- College of Medicine, Prevention Research Center, University of Kentucky, 760 Press Avenue, Room 335, Lexington, KY, 40536-0679, USA
| | - Mark Cromo
- College of Medicine, Prevention Research Center, University of Kentucky, 760 Press Avenue, Room 335, Lexington, KY, 40536-0679, USA
| | - Margaret Geertz
- Kentucky College of Osteopathic Medicine, Pikeville, KY, USA
| | | | - Eric Stockton
- Grantmakers in Health, (Formerly Appalachian Regional Commission, Washington, DC, USA), Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kruse-Diehr AJ, Dignan M, Cromo M, Carman AL, Rogers M, Gross D, Russell S. Building Cancer Prevention and Control Research Capacity in Rural Appalachian Kentucky Primary Care Clinics During COVID-19: Development and Adaptation of a Multilevel Colorectal Cancer Screening Project. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2022; 37:1407-1413. [PMID: 33599967 PMCID: PMC7890393 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-021-01972-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/07/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
This study describes the development of a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening multilevel intervention with four primary care clinics in rural Appalachian Kentucky. We also discuss barriers experienced by the clinics during COVID-19 and how clinic limitations and needs informed project modifications. Four primary care clinics were recruited, key informant interviews with clinic providers were conducted, electronic health record (EHR) capacity to collect data related to CRC screening and follow-up was assessed, and a series of meetings were held with clinic champions to discuss implementation of strategies to impact clinic CRC screening rates. Analysis of interviews revealed multilevel barriers to CRC screening. Patient-level barriers included fatalism, competing priorities, and financial and literacy concerns. The main provider- and clinic-level barriers were provider preference for colonoscopy over stool-based testing and EHR tracking concerns. Clinics selected strategies to address barriers, but the onset of COVID-19 necessitated modifications to these strategies. Due to COVID-19, changes in clinic staffing and workflow occurred, including provider furloughs, a state-mandated pause in elective procedures, and an increase in telehealth. Clinics adapted screening strategies to match changing needs, including shifting from paper to digital educational tools and using telehealth to increase annual wellness visits for screening promotion. While significant delays persist for scheduling colonoscopies, clinics were encouraged to promote stool-based tests as a primary screening modality for average-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron J Kruse-Diehr
- University of Kentucky College of Public Health, 151 Washington Avenue, Bowman Hall 345, Lexington, KY, 40536, USA.
- Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY, USA.
| | - Mark Dignan
- Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY, USA
- University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Prevention Research Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Mark Cromo
- University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Prevention Research Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Angela L Carman
- University of Kentucky College of Public Health, 151 Washington Avenue, Bowman Hall 345, Lexington, KY, 40536, USA
| | | | - David Gross
- Northeast Kentucky Area Health Education Center, Morehead, KY, USA
| | - Sue Russell
- Northeast Kentucky Area Health Education Center, Morehead, KY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kruse-Diehr AJ, Oliveri JM, Vanderpool RC, Katz ML, Reiter PL, Gray DM, Pennell ML, Young GS, Huang B, Fickle D, Cromo M, Rogers M, Gross D, Gibson A, Jellison J, Sarap MD, Bivens TA, McGuire TD, McAlearney AS, Huerta TR, Rahurkar S, Paskett ED, Dignan M. Development of a multilevel intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening in Appalachia. Implement Sci Commun 2021; 2:51. [PMID: 34011410 PMCID: PMC8136225 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-021-00151-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates are lower in Appalachian regions of the United States than in non-Appalachian regions. Given the availability of various screening modalities, there is critical need for culturally relevant interventions addressing multiple socioecological levels to reduce the regional CRC burden. In this report, we describe the development and baseline findings from year 1 of "Accelerating Colorectal Cancer Screening through Implementation Science (ACCSIS) in Appalachia," a 5-year, National Cancer Institute Cancer MoonshotSM-funded multilevel intervention (MLI) project to increase screening in Appalachian Kentucky and Ohio primary care clinics. METHODS Project development was theory-driven and included the establishment of both an external Scientific Advisory Board and a Community Advisory Board to provide guidance in conducting formative activities in two Appalachian counties: one in Kentucky and one in Ohio. Activities included identifying and describing the study communities and primary care clinics, selecting appropriate evidence-based interventions (EBIs), and conducting a pilot test of MLI strategies addressing patient, provider, clinic, and community needs. RESULTS Key informant interviews identified multiple barriers to CRC screening, including fear of screening, test results, and financial concerns (patient level); lack of time and competing priorities (provider level); lack of reminder or tracking systems and staff burden (clinic level); and cultural issues, societal norms, and transportation (community level). With this information, investigators then offered clinics a menu of EBIs and strategies to address barriers at each level. Clinics selected individually tailored MLIs, including improvement of patient education materials, provision of provider education (resulting in increased knowledge, p = .003), enhancement of electronic health record (EHR) systems and development of clinic screening protocols, and implementation of community CRC awareness events, all of which promoted stool-based screening (i.e., FIT or FIT-DNA). Variability among clinics, including differences in EHR systems, was the most salient barrier to EBI implementation, particularly in terms of tracking follow-up of positive screening results, whereas the development of clinic-wide screening protocols was found to promote fidelity to EBI components. CONCLUSIONS Lessons learned from year 1 included increased recognition of variability among the clinics and how they function, appreciation for clinic staff and provider workload, and development of strategies to utilize EHR systems. These findings necessitated a modification of study design for subsequent years. TRIAL REGISTRATION Trial NCT04427527 is registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov and was registered on June 11, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron J Kruse-Diehr
- University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY, USA.
- University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY, USA.
| | - Jill M Oliveri
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - Mira L Katz
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Paul L Reiter
- The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Darrell M Gray
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Michael L Pennell
- The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Gregory S Young
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Bin Huang
- University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Darla Fickle
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Mark Cromo
- University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Melinda Rogers
- University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - David Gross
- Northeast Kentucky Area Health Education Center, Morehead, KY, USA
| | - Ashley Gibson
- Northeast Kentucky Area Health Education Center, Morehead, KY, USA
| | | | | | - Tonia A Bivens
- Lewis County Primary Care Center, Inc. dba PrimaryPlus, Vanceburg, KY, USA
| | - Tracy D McGuire
- Lewis County Primary Care Center, Inc. dba PrimaryPlus, Vanceburg, KY, USA
| | - Ann Scheck McAlearney
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Timothy R Huerta
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Saurabh Rahurkar
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Electra D Paskett
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Mark Dignan
- University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hoogland AI, Hoogland CE, Bardach SH, Tarasenko YN, Schoenberg NE. Health Behaviors in Rural Appalachia. South Med J 2019; 112:444-449. [PMID: 31375842 DOI: 10.14423/smj.0000000000001008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To better understand the disproportionate burdens from cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, stroke, and other chronic conditions related to energy balance, we studied diet and physical activity patterns in younger and older adults in rural Appalachia by using a nonclinical, cross-sectional, community-based sampling approach. METHODS A total of 651 younger (ages 18-59) and 254 older (ages ≥60) Appalachians were recruited from 43 churches or community organizations. Participants answered questions about fruit and vegetable intake and physical activity. Analyses were adjusted for clustering within churches. RESULTS Compared with older Appalachians, younger Appalachians consumed significantly fewer fruits and vegetables (P = 0.01) and reported significantly more moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (P = 0.01). Regardless of age, engagement in healthy behaviors was suboptimal and well below national averages. CONCLUSIONS This community-based sample demonstrated elevated behavioral risk factors that likely contribute to some of the nation's highest rates of premature mortality. Despite suboptimal dietary intake and physical activity, results indicate some potential leverage points between the generations that may be used to improve health. For example, the older generation could benefit from engaging with their younger relatives in physical activities while advocating for a better-rounded diet. Given traditions of intergenerational connectedness, mutual aid, and self-reliance, transmission of healthier behaviors across the generations may be beneficial in the rural Appalachian context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aasha I Hoogland
- From the Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, the Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, the Sanders Brown Center on Aging, Graduate Center for Gerontology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, the Department of Health Policy and Management, Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, and the Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington
| | - Charles E Hoogland
- From the Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, the Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, the Sanders Brown Center on Aging, Graduate Center for Gerontology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, the Department of Health Policy and Management, Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, and the Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington
| | - Shoshana H Bardach
- From the Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, the Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, the Sanders Brown Center on Aging, Graduate Center for Gerontology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, the Department of Health Policy and Management, Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, and the Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington
| | - Yelena N Tarasenko
- From the Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, the Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, the Sanders Brown Center on Aging, Graduate Center for Gerontology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, the Department of Health Policy and Management, Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, and the Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington
| | - Nancy E Schoenberg
- From the Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, the Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, the Sanders Brown Center on Aging, Graduate Center for Gerontology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, the Department of Health Policy and Management, Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, and the Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Paskett ED, Baltic RD, Young GS, Katz ML, Lesko SM, Webber KH, Roberto KA, Lengerich EJ, Schoenberg NE, Kennedy SK, Mama S, Midkiff CC, Dignan MB. A Group Randomized Trial to Reduce Obesity among Appalachian Church Members: The Walk by Faith Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018; 27:1289-1297. [PMID: 30337343 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-17-1085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2017] [Revised: 01/29/2018] [Accepted: 09/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Appalachia is a rural, socioeconomically disadvantaged region with high rates of cancer and obesity. Using community-based participatory research principles, the Appalachia Community Cancer Network tested an initiative to reduce weight among overweight and obese participants by partnering with churches, an important community-based institution in Appalachia.Methods: A group randomized trial was conducted with counties or groups of counties in five Appalachian states. These groups were randomly assigned to receive either monthly diet and exercise education sessions ("Walk by Faith"; WbF) or an educational program focused on cancer screening and education ("Ribbons of Faith"; RoF) to examine effects on weight change. Participants completed questionnaires and biometric measurements at baseline and 12 months. The primary outcome of the study was weight change from baseline to 12 months.Results: The relative difference in weight loss from baseline to 12 months for WbF compared with RoF was 1.4% but was not statistically significant (P = 0.13). However, results varied by sex and marital status. WbF men experienced a significant 2.8% decrease in body weight, married WbF women a 1.5% decrease, and unmarried WbF women a 1.5% increase compared with their respective RoF subgroups (interaction P = 0.016). Among WbF participants, greater participation in monthly educational sessions was associated with greater weight loss (P = 0.002).Conclusions: WbF facilitated weight loss mainly in male participants. Level of participation in WbF activities correlated with weight loss.Impact: Findings suggest that additional research is needed to better understand factors associated with participation in health promotion programs for underserved rural communities. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 27(11); 1289-97. ©2018 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Electra D Paskett
- The Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. .,The Ohio State University College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Ryan D Baltic
- The Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Gregory S Young
- Center for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Mira L Katz
- The Ohio State University College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Samuel M Lesko
- Northeast Regional Cancer Institute, Scranton, Pennsylvania
| | - Kelly H Webber
- Department of Dietetics and Human Nutrition, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Karen A Roberto
- Institute for Society, Culture and Environment and Center for Gerontology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia
| | - Eugene J Lengerich
- Penn State Cancer Institute and Public Health Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Nancy E Schoenberg
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Stephenie K Kennedy
- Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center at West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Scherezade Mama
- Penn State College of Health and Human Development, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Courtney C Midkiff
- Meigs County Health Department, Meigs County Cancer Initiative, Inc., Pomeroy, Ohio
| | - Mark B Dignan
- Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Krometis LA, Gohlke J, Kolivras K, Satterwhite E, Marmagas SW, Marr LC. Environmental health disparities in the Central Appalachian region of the United States. REVIEWS ON ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 2017; 32:253-266. [PMID: 28682789 DOI: 10.1515/reveh-2017-0012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2017] [Accepted: 05/12/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Health disparities that cannot be fully explained by socio-behavioral factors persist in the Central Appalachian region of the United States. A review of available studies of environmental impacts on Appalachian health and analysis of recent public data indicates that while disparities exist, most studies of local environmental quality focus on the preservation of nonhuman biodiversity rather than on effects on human health. The limited public health studies available focus primarily on the impacts of coal mining and do not measure personal exposure, constraining the ability to identify causal relationships between environmental conditions and public health. Future efforts must engage community members in examining all potential sources of environmental health disparities to identify effective potential interventions.
Collapse
|
8
|
An Internet-Assisted Weight Loss Intervention for Older Overweight and Obese Rural Women: A Feasibility Study. Comput Inform Nurs 2017; 34:513-519. [PMID: 27392256 DOI: 10.1097/cin.0000000000000275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Older Appalachian women are an understudied population with few resources available to prevent obesity and chronic disease. This study explored the feasibility of a 12-week weight loss intervention using Internet technology for older rural Appalachian women. The sample (N = 24) included women 55 years or older recruited from two senior centers in the Appalachian region. The women were randomly assigned to either an Internet program called "Lose It" (Internet program for recording of daily calories and physical activity) or to a daily wellness program (health tips) delivered via e-mail. The mean age of participants was 69 ± 8 years. Their mean body mass index (kg/m) at baseline was 34.2 ± 8. A significant difference (P = .036) was observed between intervention and control group scores on the Social Pressure Subscale. Both groups improved their intake of fruits and vegetables and lost weight from baseline to week 12. Internet weight loss programs appear feasible for older rural women. Internet-delivered weight loss interventions that provide a way to record daily calories, physical activity, and weight may provide a technology platform leading to increased self-efficacy for weight loss.
Collapse
|
9
|
Wiese LK, Williams CL, Tappen R, Newman D, Rosselli M. Assessment of Basic Knowledge About Alzheimer’s Disease Among Older Rural Residents: A Pilot Test of a New Measure. J Nurs Meas 2017; 25:519-548. [DOI: 10.1891/1061-3749.25.3.519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Underserved rural populations face a higher risk of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), yet studies investigating AD knowledge in this population are lacking. The purpose of this research was to develop an AD basic knowledge measure that is appropriate for use with underserved populations. Method: A content domain map, content validity index, and cognitive interviews were used in developing the first version of the basic knowledge of Alzheimer’s disease (BKAD; Study 1). Reliability and validity of the measure in this descriptive study were examined using Rasch modeling and tests for construct, concurrent, and discriminate validity (Study 2). Multiple regression was employed to examine AD knowledge predictors. Results: Findings included that the BKAD instrument discriminated well between persons with varied education levels. Psychometric analysis yielded important information to guide revision of the BKAD measure. Conclusion: The BKAD measure shows promise in meeting the need for a culturally relevant measure to assess basic Alzheimer’s disease knowledge in underserved rural populations.
Collapse
|
10
|
Bruce MA, Beech BM, Griffith DM, Thorpe RJ. Spirituality, Religiosity, and Weight Management Among African American Adolescent Males: The Jackson Heart KIDS Pilot Study. Behav Med 2016; 42:183-9. [PMID: 27337622 PMCID: PMC5656381 DOI: 10.1080/08964289.2015.1121133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Spirituality and religion have been identified as important determinants of health for adults; however, the impact of faith-oriented factors on health behaviors and outcomes among African American adolescent males has not been well studied. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between religiosity and spirituality and obesity-related behaviors among 12-19 year old African American males (N = 105) in the Jackson Heart KIDS Pilot Study. Key variables of interest are church attendance, prayer, daily spirituality, weight status, attempts to lose weight, nutrition, physical activity, and stress. Daily spirituality is associated with whether an individual attempts to lose weight. The results from logistic regression models suggest that daily spirituality increases the odds that African American male adolescents attempt to lose weight (OR = 1.22, CI: 1.07-1.41) and have a history of diet-focused weight management (OR = 1.13, CI: 1.02-1.26). Future studies are needed to further explore the association between religion, spirituality, and obesity-related behaviors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marino A. Bruce
- Center for Health of Minority Males, Myrlie Evers-Williams Institute for the Elimination of Health Disparities, Jackson MS, USA, ,Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice, Jackson State University, Jackson, MS
| | - Bettina M. Beech
- Center for Health of Minority Males, Myrlie Evers-Williams Institute for the Elimination of Health Disparities, Jackson MS, USA, ,Departments of Pediatrics and Family Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA,
| | - Derek M. Griffith
- Institute for Research on Men’s Health, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA, ,Center for Medicine, Health, and Society, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Roland J. Thorpe
- Program for Research on Men’s Health, Johns Hopkins Center for Health Disparities Solutions, Baltimore, MD, USA, ,Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|