Design, rationale, and baseline characteristics of the randomized double-blind phase II clinical trial of ibudilast in progressive multiple sclerosis

Ibudilast reduces slowly enlarging lesions in progressive multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Ibudilast has shown beneficial effects on several imaging outcomes in progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). Slowly enlarging lesions are a proposed imaging biomarker of compartmentalized inflammation within chronic active lesions.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the treatment effect of ibudilast on slowly enlarging lesion volumes over 96 weeks from a phase II clinical trial of ibudilast (Secondary and Primary Progressive Ibudilast NeuroNEXT Trial in Multiple Sclerosis [SPRINT-MS]).

METHODS

In total, 255 participants with progressive MS from 28 sites were randomized to oral ibudilast or placebo. Participants with at least four analyzable magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included. Slowly enlarging lesions were quantified using Jacobian determinant maps. A linear model was used to assess the effect of ibudilast. Magnetization transfer ratio within slowly enlarging lesions was assessed to determine the effect of ibudilast on tissue integrity.

RESULTS

In total, 195 participants were included in this analysis. Ibudilast significantly decreased slowly enlarging lesion volume (23%, p = 0.003). Ibudilast also reduced magnetization transfer ratio change in slowly enlarging lesions: 0.22%/year, p = 0.04.

CONCLUSION

Ibudilast showed a significant effect on baseline volume of lesions that were slowly enlarging and magnetization transfer ratio in slowly enlarging lesions. The results support the use of slowly enlarging lesions for assessment of compartmentalized inflammation represented by chronic active lesions and provide further support for the neuroprotective effects of ibudilast in progressive MS.

Serum macrophage migration inhibitory factor levels predict brain atrophy in people with primary progressive multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) is a cytokine linked to multiple sclerosis (MS) progression that is thought to be inhibited by ibudilast. SPRINT-MS was a phase 2 placebo-controlled trial of ibudilast in progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS).

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether baseline MIF levels predict imaging outcomes and assess the effects of ibudilast on serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) MIF levels in people with PMS treated with ibudilast.

METHODS

Participants in the SPRINT-MS trial were treated with either ibudilast or placebo and underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) every 24 weeks over a duration of 96 weeks. MIF was measured in serum and CSF.

RESULTS

MIF levels were compared with imaging outcomes in 223 participants from the SPRINT-MS study. In the primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) cohort, males had higher serum (p < 0.001) and CSF (p = 0.01) MIF levels, as compared with females. Higher baseline serum MIF levels in PPMS were associated with faster brain atrophy (beta = -0.113%, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.204% to -0.021%; p = 0.016). These findings were not observed in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). Ibudilast did not affect either serum or CSF MIF levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum MIF levels were associated with male sex and predicted brain atrophy in PPMS, but not SPMS. Ibudilast did not demonstrate an effect on MIF levels, as compared with placebo, although we cannot exclude a functional effect.

The effect of ibudilast on thalamic volume in progressive multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Thalamic volume loss is known to be associated with clinical and cognitive disability in progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the treatment effect of ibudilast on thalamic atrophy more than 96 weeks in the phase 2 trial in progressive(MS Secondary and Primary Progressive Ibudilast NeuroNEXT Trial in Multiple Sclerosis [SPRINT-MS]).

METHODS

A total of 231 participants were randomized to either ibudilast (n = 114) or placebo (n = 117). Thalamic volume change was computed using Bayesian Sequence Adaptive Multimodal Segmentation tool (SAMseg) incorporating T1, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), and fractional anisotropy maps and analyzed with a mixed-effects repeated-measures model.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in thalamic volumes between treatment groups. On exploratory analysis, participants with primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) on placebo had a 0.004% greater rate of thalamic atrophy than PPMS participants on ibudilast (p = 0.058, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.008 to <0.001). Greater reductions in thalamic volumes at more than 96 weeks were associated with worsening multiple sclerosis functional composite (MSFC-4) scores (p = 0.002) and worsening performance on the symbol digit modality test (SDMT) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In a phase 2 trial evaluating ibudilast in PMS, no treatment effect was demonstrated in preventing thalamic atrophy. Participants with PPMS exhibited a treatment effect that trended toward significance. Longitudinal changes in thalamic volume were related to worsening of physical and cognitive disability, highlighting this outcome's clinical importance.

Phosphodiesterase inhibitor, ibudilast alleviates core behavioral and biochemical deficits in the prenatal valproic acid exposure model of autism spectrum disorder

BACKGROUND

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is categorized as a neurodevelopmental disorder, presenting with a variety of aetiological and phenotypical features. Ibudilast is known to produce beneficial effects in several neurological disorders including neuropathic pain, multiple sclerosis, etc. by displaying its neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory properties. Here, in our study, the pharmacological outcome of ibudilast administration was investigated in the prenatal valproic acid (VPA)-model of ASD in Wistar rats.

METHODS

Autistic-like symptoms were induced in Wistar male pups of dams administered with Valproic acid (VPA) on embryonic day 12.5. VPA-exposed male pups were administered with two doses of ibudilast (5 and10 mg/kg) and all the groups were evaluated for behavioral parameters like social interaction, spatial memory/learning, anxiety, locomotor activity, and nociceptive threshold. Further, the possible neuroprotective effect of ibudilast was evaluated by assessing oxidative stress, neuroinflammation (IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10) in the hippocampus, % area of Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)-positive cells and neuronal damage in the cerebellum.

KEY FINDINGS

Treatment with ibudilast significantly attenuated prenatal VPA exposure associated social interaction and spatial learning/memory deficits, anxiety, hyperactivity, and increased nociceptive threshold, and it decreased oxidative stress markers, pro-inflammatory markers (IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6), and % area of GFAP-positive cells and restored neuronal damage.

CONCLUSIONS

Ibudilast treatment has restored crucial ASD-related behavioural abnormalities, potentially through neuroprotection. Therefore, benefits of ibudilast administration in animal models of ASD suggest that ibudilast may have therapeutic potential in the treatment of ASD.

Effects of Ibudilast on Retinal Atrophy in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Subtypes: Post Hoc Analyses of the SPRINT-MS Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Ganglion cell + inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thinning, measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT), reflects global neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis (MS). Atrophy of the inner (INL) and outer nuclear layer (ONL) may also be prominent in progressive MS (PMS). The phase 2, SPRINT-MS trial found reduced brain atrophy with ibudilast therapy in PMS. In this post hoc analysis of the SPRINT-MS trial, we investigate (1) retinal atrophy (2) differences in response by subtype and (3) associations between OCT and MRI measures of neurodegeneration.

METHODS

In the multicenter, double-blind SPRINT-MS trial, participants with secondary progressive MS (SPMS) or primary progressive MS (PPMS) were randomized to ibudilast or placebo. OCT and MRI data were collected every 24 weeks for 96 weeks. Extensive OCT quality control and algorithmic segmentation produced consistent results across Cirrus HD-OCT and Spectralis devices. Primary endpoints were GCIPL, INL, and ONL atrophy, assessed by linear mixed-effects regression. Secondary endpoints were associations of OCT measures, brain parenchymal fraction, and cortical thickness, assessed by partial Pearson correlations.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-four PPMS and 121 SPMS participants were included. GCIPL atrophy was 79% slower in the ibudilast (-0.07 ± 0.23 µm/y) vs placebo group (-0.32 ± 0.20 µm/y, p = 0.003). This effect predominated in the PPMS cohort (ibudilast: -0.08 ± 0.29 µm/y vs placebo: -0.60 ± 0.29 µm/y, a decrease of 87%, p < 0.001) and was not detected in the SPMS cohort (ibudilast: -0.21 ± 0.28 µm/y vs placebo: -0.14 ± 0.27 µm/y, p = 0.55). GCIPL, INL, and ONL atrophy rates correlated with whole brain atrophy rates across the cohort (r = 0.27, r = 0.26, and r = 0.20, respectively; p < 0.001). Power calculations from these data show future trials of similar size and design have ≥80% power to detect GCIPL atrophy effect sizes of approximately 40%.

DISCUSSION

Ibudilast treatment decreased GCIPL atrophy in PMS, driven by the PPMS cohort, with no effect seen in SPMS. Modulated atrophy of retinal layers may be detectable in sample sizes smaller than the SPRINT-MS trial and correlate with whole brain atrophy in PMS, further highlighting their utility as outcomes in PMS.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class II evidence that ibudilast reduces composite ganglion cell + inner plexiform layer atrophy, without reduction of inner or outer nuclear layer atrophy, in patients with primary progressive MS but not those with secondary progressive MS.

Nose to brain delivery of ibudilast micelles for treatment of multiple sclerosis in an experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis animal model

Multiple sclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system ultimate to neurodegeneration and demyelination. Ibudilast is a phosphodiesterase inhibitor, effective on the function of glial cells and lymphocytes, and inhibits the release of TNF-α by inflammatory cells. Dysregulation of glia is one of the most important pathological causes of MS. Therefore, ibudilast as a glial attenuator can be a useful treatment. The objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of nasal spray of polydopamine coated micelles of surfactin, a biosurfactant, loaded with ibudilast on its brain targeted delivery and effectiveness in remylination and neuroprotection in animal model of MS. In animal studies the micelles were administrated intranasally in different doses of 10, 25 and 50 mg/kg/day in C57/BL6 mice immunized by experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model. The results of Luxol fast blue staining indicated increment in myelin fiber percent more significantly (p<0.05) in the groups treated with the polydopamine coated micelles (PDAM) compared to nasal spray of free drug or oral administration. These formulations also increased expression of Mbp, Olig2 and Mog genes in the corpus callosum. These results suggest a positive outcome of polydopamine coated micelles loaded with ibudilast in active MS as an anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective agent.

Targeting patient recovery priorities in degenerative cervical myelopathy: design and rationale for the RECEDE-Myelopathy trial-study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a common and disabling condition of symptomatic cervical spinal cord compression secondary to degenerative changes in spinal structures leading to a mechanical stress injury of the spinal cord. RECEDE-Myelopathy aims to test the disease-modulating activity of the phosphodiesterase 3/phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor Ibudilast as an adjuvant to surgical decompression in DCM.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

RECEDE-Myelopathy is a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Participants will be randomised to receive either 60-100 mg Ibudilast or placebo starting within 10 weeks prior to surgery and continuing for 24 weeks after surgery for a maximum of 34 weeks. Adults with DCM, who have a modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score 8-14 inclusive and are scheduled for their first decompressive surgery are eligible for inclusion. The coprimary endpoints are pain measured on a visual analogue scale and physical function measured by the mJOA score at 6 months after surgery. Clinical assessments will be undertaken preoperatively, postoperatively and 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. We hypothesise that adjuvant therapy with Ibudilast leads to a meaningful and additional improvement in either pain or function, as compared with standard routine care.

STUDY DESIGN

Clinical trial protocol V.2.2 October 2020.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval has been obtained from HRA-Wales.The results will be presented at an international and national scientific conferences and in a peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN Number: ISRCTN16682024.

Ibudilast ameliorates experimentally induced colitis in rats via down-regulation of proinflammatory cytokines and myeloperoxidase enzyme activity

Objectives: This study was carried out to explore the possible anti-inflammatory effect of ibudilast on acetic acid-induced colitis in rats.

Methods: Fifty adult Wistar rats were separated into 5 groups, including the control group, acetic acid group, acetic acid + vehicle, acetic acid + sulfasalazine (100 mg/kg/day)group, and acetic acid + ibudilast (30 mg/kg/day) group. Colitis was induced in rats by the inter-rectal installation of 2 ml of 4% (v/v) acetic acid. Sulfasalazine and ibudilast were administered orally for ten days after 2 hours of induction.

Results: The treatment with ibudilast significantly reduced disease activity index (DAI), macroscopic colonic scores (MAC), and histopathological changes induced by acetic acid. Also, ibudilast markedly decreased the expression of proinflammatory markers (TNF-α and IL-1β) in colonic tissue. Moreover, ibudilast inhibited myeloperoxidase (MPO) enzyme activity that was increased by acetic acid.

Conclusion: Therefore, ibudilast may have a therapeutic effect in the management of ulcerative colitis.

Selective PDE4 subtype inhibition provides new opportunities to intervene in neuroinflammatory versus myelin damaging hallmarks of multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune disease of the central nervous system (CNS) characterized by focal inflammatory lesions and prominent demyelination. Even though the currently available therapies are effective in treating the initial stages of disease, they are unable to halt or reverse disease progression into the chronic progressive stage. Thus far, no repair-inducing treatments are available for progressive MS patients. Hence, there is an urgent need for the development of new therapeutic strategies either targeting the destructive immunological demyelination or boosting endogenous repair mechanisms. Using in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo models, we demonstrate that selective inhibition of phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4), a family of enzymes that hydrolyzes and inactivates cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), reduces inflammation and promotes myelin repair. More specifically, we segregated the myelination-promoting and anti-inflammatory effects into a PDE4D- and PDE4B-dependent process respectively. We show that inhibition of PDE4D boosts oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPC) differentiation and enhances (re)myelination of both murine OPCs and human iPSC-derived OPCs. In addition, PDE4D inhibition promotes in vivo remyelination in the cuprizone model, which is accompanied by improved spatial memory and reduced visual evoked potential latency times. We further identified that PDE4B-specific inhibition exerts anti-inflammatory effects since it lowers in vitro monocytic nitric oxide (NO) production and improves in vivo neurological scores during the early phase of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). In contrast to the pan PDE4 inhibitor roflumilast, the therapeutic dose of both the PDE4B-specific inhibitor A33 and the PDE4D-specific inhibitor Gebr32a did not trigger emesis-like side effects in rodents. Finally, we report distinct PDE4D isoform expression patterns in human area postrema neurons and human oligodendroglia lineage cells. Using the CRISPR-Cas9 system, we confirmed that pde4d1/2 and pde4d6 are the key targets to induce OPC differentiation. Collectively, these data demonstrate that gene specific PDE4 inhibitors have potential as novel therapeutic agents for targeting the distinct disease processes of MS.

Emerging Potential of the Phosphodiesterase (PDE) Inhibitor Ibudilast for Neurodegenerative Diseases: An Update on Preclinical and Clinical Evidence

Neurodegenerative diseases constitute a broad range of central nervous system disorders, characterized by neuronal degeneration. Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, amyolotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and progressive forms of multiple sclerosis (MS) are some of the most frequent neurodegenerative diseases. Despite their diversity, these diseases share some common pathophysiological mechanisms: the abnormal aggregation of disease-related misfolded proteins, autophagosome-lysosome pathway dysregulation, impaired ubiquitin-proteasome system, oxidative damage, mitochondrial dysfunction and excessive neuroinflammation. There is still no effective drug that could halt the progression of neurodegenerative diseases, and the current treatments are mainly symptomatic. In this regard, the development of novel multi-target pharmaceutical approaches presents an attractive therapeutic strategy. Ibudilast, an anti-inflammatory drug firstly developed as an asthma treatment, is a cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases (PDEs) inhibitor, which mainly acts by increasing the amount of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP), while downregulating the pro-inflammatory factors, such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) and Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR-4). The preclinical evidence shows that ibudilast may act neuroprotectively in neurodegenerative diseases, by suppressing neuroinflammation, inhibiting apoptosis, regulating the mitochondrial function and by affecting the ubiquitin-proteasome and autophagosome-lysosome pathways, as well as by attenuating oxidative stress. The clinical trials in ALS and progressive MS also show some promising results. Herein, we aim to provide an update on the emerging preclinical and clinical evidence on the therapeutic potential of ibudilast in these disorders, discuss the potential challenges and suggest the future directions.

Novel Drugs in a Pipeline for Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a widely known inflammatory, demyelinating disease of the central nervous system. The pathogenesis of progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS) is a complex, multi-level process that causes therapeutic difficulties. Along with variables such as age and duration of the disease, pathogenetic mechanisms change from inflammatory to neurodegenerative processes. Therefore, the efficacy of available anti-inflammatory drugs approved for the treatment of PMS, such as ocrelizumab or siponimod, is limited in time. In search of innovative solutions, several research studies have been conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of drugs with neuroprotective or remyelinating effects in PMS, including biotin, ibudilast, simvastatin, alpha-lipoic acid, clemastine, amiloride, fluoxetine, riluzole, masitinib, opicinumab, and lamotrigine. The current review includes those compounds, which have entered the clinical phase of assessment, and the authors discuss future prospects for successful PMS treatment.

MN-166 (ibudilast) in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in a Phase IIb/III study: COMBAT-ALS study design

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease with motor neuron loss as a defining feature. Despite significant effort, therapeutic breakthroughs have been modest. MN-166 (ibudilast) has demonstrated neuroprotective action by various mechanisms: inhibition of proinflammatory cytokines and macrophage migration inhibitory factor, phosphodiesterase inhibition, and attenuation of glial cell activation in models of ALS. Early-phase studies suggest that MN-166 may improve survival outcomes and slow disease progression in patients with ALS. This article describes the rationale and design of COMBAT-ALS, an ongoing randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter Phase IIb/III study in ALS. This study is designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability and assess the efficacy of MN-166 on function, muscle strength, quality of life and survival in ALS.

Suppression of Plasmodium MIF-CD74 signaling protects against severe malaria

The deadliest complication of infection by Plasmodium parasites, cerebral malaria, accounts for the majority of malarial fatalities. Although our understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the pathology remains incomplete, recent studies support the contribution of systemic and neuroinflammation as the cause of cerebral edema and blood-brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction. All Plasmodium species encode an orthologue of the innate cytokine, Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor (MIF), which functions in mammalian biology to regulate innate responses. Plasmodium MIF (PMIF) similarly signals through the host MIF receptor CD74, leading to an enhanced inflammatory response. We investigated the PMIF-CD74 interaction in the onset of experimental cerebral malaria (ECM) and liver stage Plasmodium development by using a combination of CD74 deficient (Cd74^-/- ) hosts and PMIF deficient parasites. Cd74^-/- mice were found to be protected from ECM and the protection was associated with the inability of brain microvessels to present parasite antigen to sequestered and pathogenic Plasmodium-specific CD8⁺ T cells. Infection of WT hosts with PMIF-deficient sporozoites or infection of Cd74^-/- hosts with WT sporozoites impacted the survival of infected hepatocytes and subsequently reduced blood-stage associated inflammation, contributing to protection from ECM. We recapitulated these finding with a novel pharmacologic PMIF-selective antagonist that reduced PMIF/CD74 signaling and fully protected mice from ECM. These findings reveal a conserved mechanism for Plasmodium usurpation of host CD74 signaling and suggest a tractable approach for new pharmacologic intervention.

Deep grey matter injury in multiple sclerosis: a NAIMS consensus statement

Although multiple sclerosis has traditionally been considered a white matter disease, extensive research documents the presence and importance of grey matter injury including cortical and deep regions. The deep grey matter exhibits a broad range of pathology and is uniquely suited to study the mechanisms and clinical relevance of tissue injury in multiple sclerosis using magnetic resonance techniques. Deep grey matter injury has been associated with clinical and cognitive disability. Recently, MRI characterization of deep grey matter properties, such as thalamic volume, have been tested as potential clinical trial end points associated with neurodegenerative aspects of multiple sclerosis. Given this emerging area of interest and its potential clinical trial relevance, the North American Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis (NAIMS) Cooperative held a workshop and reached consensus on imaging topics related to deep grey matter. Herein, we review current knowledge regarding deep grey matter injury in multiple sclerosis from an imaging perspective, including insights from histopathology, image acquisition and post-processing for deep grey matter. We discuss the clinical relevance of deep grey matter injury and specific regions of interest within the deep grey matter. We highlight unanswered questions and propose future directions, with the aim of focusing research priorities towards better methods, analysis, and interpretation of results.

Influence of equipment changes on MRI measures of brain atrophy and brain microstructure in a placebo-controlled trial of ibudilast in progressive multiple sclerosis

Background

Hardware changes can be an unavoidable confound in imaging trials. Understanding the impact of such changes may play an important role in the analysis of imaging data.

Objective

To characterize the effect of equipment changes in a longitudinal, multi-site multiple sclerosis trial.

Methods

Using data from a clinical trial in progressive multiple sclerosis, we explored how major changes in imaging hardware affected data. We analyzed the extent to which these changes affected imaging biomarkers and the estimated treatment effects by including such changes as a time-dependent covariate.

Results

Significant differences whole brain atrophy (brain parenchymal fraction, BPF) and microstructure (transverse diffusivity, TD) between scans with and without changes were found and depended on the type of hardware change. A switch from GE HDxt to Siemens Skyra led to significant shifts in BPF (p < 0.04) and TD (p < 0.0001). However, we could not detect the influence of hardware changes on overall trial outcomes- differences between placebo and treatment arms in change over time of BPF and TD (p > 0.5).

Conclusions

The results suggest that differences among hardware types should be considered when planning and analyzing brain atrophy and diffusivity in a longitudinal clinical trial.

Neurofilament light chain in a phase 2 clinical trial of ibudilast in progressive multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Sensitive and specific biomarkers for use in progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) have not been established. We investigate neurofilament light (NfL) as a treatment response biomarker in progressive MS.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether ibudilast 100 mg/day alters serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of NfL in progressive MS.

METHODS

In a protocol-defined exploratory analysis from a 2-year, phase 2 clinical trial of ibudilast in progressive MS (NCT01982942), serum samples were collected from 239 subjects and a subset contributed CSF and assayed using single-molecule assay (SIMOA) immunoassay. A mixed model for repeated measurements yielded log(NfL) as the response variable.

RESULTS

The geometric mean baseline serum NfL was 31.9 and 28.8 pg/mL in placebo and ibudilast groups, respectively. The geometric mean baseline CSF NfL was 1150.8 and 1290.3 pg/mL in placebo and ibudilast groups, respectively. Serum and CSF NfL correlations were r = 0.52 and r = 0.78 at weeks 48 and 96, respectively. Over 96 weeks, there was no between-group difference in NfL in either serum (p = 0.76) or CSF (p = 0.46). After controlling for factors that may affect NfL, no effect of ibudilast on NfL in either serum or CSF was observed.

CONCLUSION

Ibudilast treatment was not associated with a change in either serum or CSF NfL.

Seven-Year Experience From the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Supported Network for Excellence in Neuroscience Clinical Trials

Importance

One major advantage of developing large, federally funded networks for clinical research in neurology is the ability to have a trial-ready network that can efficiently conduct scientifically rigorous projects to improve the health of people with neurologic disorders.

Observations

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Network for Excellence in Neuroscience Clinical Trials (NeuroNEXT) was established in 2011 and renewed in 2018 with the goal of being an efficient network to test between 5 and 7 promising new agents in phase II clinical trials. A clinical coordinating center, data coordinating center, and 25 sites were competitively chosen. Common infrastructure was developed to accelerate timelines for clinical trials, including central institutional review board (a first for the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke), master clinical trial agreements, the use of common data elements, and experienced research sites and coordination centers. During the first 7 years, the network exceeded the goal of conducting 5 to 7 studies, with 9 funded. High interest was evident by receipt of 148 initial applications for potential studies in various neurologic disorders. Across the first 8 studies (the ninth study was funded at end of initial funding period), the central institutional review board approved the initial protocol in a mean (SD) of 59 (21) days, and additional sites were added a mean (SD) of 22 (18) days after submission. The median time from central institutional review board approval to first site activation was 47.5 days (mean, 102.1; range, 1-282) and from first site activation to first participant consent was 27 days (mean, 37.5; range, 0-96). The median time for database readiness was 3.5 months (mean, 4.0; range, 0-8) from funding receipt. In the 4 completed studies, enrollment met or exceeded expectations with 96% overall data accuracy across all sites. Nine peer-reviewed manuscripts were published, and 22 oral presentations or posters and 9 invited presentations were given at regional, national, and international meetings.

Conclusions and Relevance

NeuroNEXT initiated 8 studies, successfully enrolled participants at or ahead of schedule, collected high-quality data, published primary results in high-impact journals, and provided mentorship, expert statistical, and trial management support to several new investigators. Partnerships were successfully created between government, academia, industry, foundations, and patient advocacy groups. Clinical trial consortia can efficiently and successfully address a range of important neurologic research and therapeutic questions.

Response to ibudilast treatment according to progressive multiple sclerosis disease phenotype

OBJECTIVE

Determine whether a treatment effect of ibudilast on brain atrophy rate differs between participants with primary (PPMS) and secondary (SPMS) progressive multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND

Progressive forms of MS are both associated with continuous disability progression. Whether PPMS and SPMS differ in treatment response remains unknown.

DESIGN/METHODS

SPRINT-MS was a randomized, placebo-controlled 96-week phase 2 trial in both PPMS (n = 134) and SPMS (n = 121) patients. The effect of PPMS and SPMS phenotype on the rate of change of brain atrophy measured by brain parenchymal fraction (BPF) was examined by fitting a three-way interaction linear-mixed model. Adjustment for differences in baseline demographics, disease measures, and brain size was explored.

RESULTS

Analysis showed that there was a three-way interaction between the time, treatment effect, and disease phenotype (P < 0.06). After further inspection, the overall treatment effect was primarily driven by patients with PPMS (P < 0.01), and not by patients with SPMS (P = 0.97). This difference may have been due to faster brain atrophy progression seen in the PPMS placebo group compared to SPMS placebo (P < 0.02). Although backward selection (P < 0.05) retained age, T2 lesion volume, RNFL, and longitudinal diffusivity as significant baseline covariates in the linear-mixed model, the adjusted overall treatment effect was still driven by PPMS (P < 0.01).

INTERPRETATION

The previously reported overall treatment effect of ibudilast on worsening of brain atrophy in progressive MS appears to be driven by patients with PPMS that may be, in part, because of the faster atrophy progression rates seen in the placebo-treated group.

Optical coherence tomography outcomes from SPRINT-MS, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial of ibudilast in progressive multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

The SPRINT-MS trial demonstrated benefit of ibudilast on brain atrophy over 96 weeks in progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed in all trial participants.

OBJECTIVE

Report the OCT results of the SPRINT-MS trial.

METHODS

OCT was obtained at baseline and every 6 months using spectral domain OCT and analyzed by an OCT reading center. Change in each OCT outcome measure by treatment group was estimated using linear mixed models.

RESULTS

Change in pRNFL thickness was +0.0424 uM/year (95% confidence interval (CI): -0.3091 to 0.3939) for ibudilast versus -0.2630 uM (95% CI: -0.5973 to 0.0714) for placebo (n = 244, p = 0.22). Macular volume change was -0.00503 mm³/year (-0.02693 to 0.01688) with ibudilast versus -0.03659 mm³/year (-0.05824 to -0.01494) for placebo in the Spectralis cohort (n = 61, p = 0.044). For the Cirrus cohort, macular volume change was -0.00040 mm³/year (-0.02167, 0.020866) with ibudilast compared to -0.02083 mm³/year (-0.04134 to -0.00033) for placebo (n = 183, p = 0.1734). Ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness change, available from Cirrus, was -0.4893 uM/year (-0.9132, -0.0654) with ibudilast versus -0.9587 uM/year (-1.3677, -0.5498) with placebo (n = 183, p = 0.12).

CONCLUSION

Retinal thinning in MS may be attenuated by ibudilast. Sample size estimates suggest OCT can be a viable outcome measure in progressive MS trials if a therapy has a large treatment effect.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NN102/SPRINT-MS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01982942.

Serum neurofilament light as a biomarker in progressive multiple sclerosis

There is an unmet need in multiple sclerosis (MS) therapy for treatments to stop progressive disability. The development of treatments may be accelerated if novel biomarkers are developed to overcome the limitations of traditional imaging outcomes revealed in early phase trials. In January 2019, the International Progressive MS Alliance convened a standing expert panel to consider potential tissue fluid biomarkers in MS in general and in progressive MS specifically. The panel focused their attention on neurofilament light chain (NfL) in serum or plasma, examining data from both relapsing and progressive MS. Here, we report the initial conclusions of the panel and its recommendations for further research. Serum NfL (sNfL) is a plausible marker of neurodegeneration that can be measured accurately, sensitively, and reproducibly, but standard procedures for sample processing and analysis should be established. Findings from relapsing and progressive cohorts concur and indicate that sNfL concentrations correlate with imaging and disability measures, predict the future course of the disease, and can predict response to treatment. Importantly, disease activity from active inflammation (i.e., new T2 and gadolinium-enhancing lesions) is a large contributor to sNfL, so teasing apart disease activity from the disease progression that drives insidious disability progression in progressive MS will be challenging. More data are required on the effects of age and comorbidities, as well as the relative contributions of inflammatory activity and other disease processes. The International Progressive MS Alliance is well positioned to advance these initiatives by connecting and supporting relevant stakeholders in progressive MS.

Vitamin D Levels and Visual System Measurements in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Cross-sectional Study

Background

Vitamin D deficiency is associated with increased disease activity in multiple sclerosis (MS), but its role in progressive MS has not been elucidated. The objective was to determine the correlation between vitamin D levels and visual parameters in primary progressive MS (PPMS) and secondary progressive MS (SPMS).

Methods

Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) and 25-hydroxyvitamin D₃ (25[OH]D₃) levels were obtained from the Secondary and Primary Progressive Ibudilast NeuroNEXT Trial in MS (SPRINT-MS). Visual function measurements and vitamin D associations were determined using the Pearson correlation and the generalized linear mixed model.

Results

The analysis included 258 patients (mean ± SD age of 55.6 ± 7.3 years, 52.7% female, and 52.3% PPMS). Mean vitamin D values were above sufficiency and were similar between PPMS and SPMS (P = .47 and P = .31). There was no association between 25(OH)D₃ levels and any visual markers, including peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (Spearman r = -0.08), macular volume (r = -0.03), ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (r = -0.07), and 2.5% low-contrast visual acuity test (r = -0.10). No statistically significant associations between vitamin D levels and visual system measurements were detected in the PPMS and SPMS subgroups.

Conclusions

Vitamin D levels were not associated with optical coherence tomography findings or low-contrast letter acuity in this group of patients with progressive MS.

Ibudilast enhances the clearance of SOD1 and TDP-43 aggregates through TFEB-mediated autophagy and lysosomal biogenesis: The new molecular mechanism of ibudilast and its implication for neuroprotective therapy

A key feature of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and other neurodegenerative disorders including Alzheimer disease (AD), Parkinson disease (PD) and Huntington's disease (HD) is abnormal aggregation and deposition of misfolded proteins. Previous studies have shown that autophagy plays an important role in the clearance of disease-linked protein aggregates. In the current study, we report that ibudilast, which is a non-selective inhibitor of phosphodiesterases (PDEs) and an anti-inflammation drug, can induce autophagy and lysosomal biogenesis through mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 - transcription factor EB (mTORC1-TFEB) signaling. We have found that ibudilast significantly enhances the clearance of disease-linked TAR DNA binding protein (TDP-43) and superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) protein aggregates in transfected cellular models carrying corresponding gene mutations. The mechanistic study revealed that ibudilast could markedly enhance TFEB nuclear translocation and increase the autolysosomes by inhibiting mTORC1 activity. We have also demonstrated that ibudilast could protect TDP-43-induced cytotoxicity in motor neuron-like NSC-34 cells. Collectively, our study identifies ibudilast as an autophagy enhancer and provides insights into the molecular basis of ibudilast for the potential treatment of several neurodegenerative disorders.

Treatment of multiple sclerosis - success from bench to bedside

The modern era of multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment began 25 years ago, with the approval of IFNβ and glatiramer acetate for the treatment of relapsing-remitting MS. Ten years later, the first monoclonal antibody, natalizumab, was approved, followed by a third important landmark with the introduction of oral medications, initially fingolimod and then teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate and cladribine. Concomitantly, new monoclonal antibodies (alemtuzumab and ocrelizumab) have been developed and approved. The modern era of MS therapy reached primary progressive MS in 2018, with the approval of ocrelizumab. We have also learned the importance of starting treatment early and the importance of clinical and MRI monitoring to assess treatment response and safety. Treatment decisions should account for disease phenotype, prognostic factors, comorbidities, the desire for pregnancy and the patient's preferences in terms of acceptable risk. The development of treatment for MS during the past 25 years is a fantastic success of translational medicine.

Progressive multiple sclerosis: latest therapeutic developments and future directions

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory condition of the central nervous system leading to demyelination and neurodegeneration. While the initial presentation is mostly characterized by a relapsing-remitting disease, patients often progress naturally after 10-15 years to a secondary-progressive disease course. Another 10-15% present with an initial, primary-progressive MS course. Pathogenic mechanisms possibly driving progression include continued compartmentalized inflammation by T- and B-lymphocytes and cells of innate immunity, oxidative stress, iron accumulation, and consecutive mitochondrial damage, altogether leading to neurodegeneration with accumulation of disability. Increasing knowledge about pathogenic mechanisms involved in progressive MS helps to design more specific and precise therapeutic approaches. Successful examples are the B-cell targeting monoclonal antibody ocrelizumab, effective in primary progressive MS, and the sphingosine-1-receptor modulator siponimod, effective in active forms of secondary-progressive MS. Apart from that, other medications such as the B-cell targeted antibody ofatumumab, cladribine due to T- and B-cell depletion, and other sphingosine-1-receptor modulators such as ozanimod and ponesimod are under development. Moreover, some therapeutic approaches in preclinical stages are under development. In this review, we will summarize the newest therapeutic development in the field of progressive MS of the last 3 years, and shed light on auspicious substances with similar mechanisms and new developments in the therapeutic pipeline, presumably supporting a bright future for progressive MS treatment.

Vitamin D and MRI measures in progressive multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Vitamin D deficiency is a proposed risk factor for multiple sclerosis (MS), but its role in progressive MS is not well understood.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between vitamin D levels and MRI features in primary progressive (PPMS) and secondary progressive MS (SPMS).

METHODS

Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) and 25-hydroxyvitamin D₃ (25[OH]D₃) levels were obtained from 267 subjects enrolled into the Secondary and Primary Progressive Ibudilast NeuroNEXT Trial in Multiple Sclerosis (SPRINT-MS). Associations between imaging data and vitamin D levels was determined using Pearson or Spearman correlation and multivariate regression analyses.

RESULTS

267 patients (age 55.6 ± 7.4, 47.2% male, and 51.3% PPMS) were evaluated with quantitative MRI and vitamin D levels. 25(OH)D and 25(OH)D₃ were similar between PPMS and SPMS. There was no significant association between vitamin D and T1/2 lesion volume and brain parenchymal fraction. Modest associations were found between 25(OH)D₃ and whole brain-magnetization transfer ratio (WB-MTR, r = 0.17, p = 0.007) and normal appearing grey matter MTR (NAGM-MTR, r = 0.15, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

25(OH)D₃ levels were not associated with brain volume or lesional measures in progressive MS contrary to what has been described in relapsing remitting MS. An association between WB-MTR and NAGM-MTR suggest higher vitamin D levels may exert a protective role on myelin content in progressive MS.

Progressive multiple sclerosis: from pathophysiology to therapeutic strategies

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system that involves demyelination and axonal degeneration. Although substantial progress has been made in drug development for relapsing-remitting MS, treatment of the progressive forms of the disease, which are characterized clinically by the accumulation of disability in the absence of relapses, remains unsatisfactory. This unmet clinical need is related to the complexity of the pathophysiological mechanisms involved in MS progression. Chronic inflammation, which occurs behind a closed blood-brain barrier with activation of microglia and continued involvement of T cells and B cells, is a hallmark pathophysiological feature. Inflammation can enhance mitochondrial damage in neurons, which, consequently, develop an energy deficit, further reducing axonal health. The growth-inhibitory and inflammatory environment of lesions also impairs remyelination, a repair process that might protect axons from degeneration. Moreover, neurodegeneration is accelerated by the altered expression of ion channels on denuded axons. In this Review, we discuss the current understanding of these disease mechanisms and highlight emerging therapeutic strategies based on these insights, including those targeting the neuroinflammatory and degenerative aspects as well as remyelination-promoting approaches.

Evolution of Visual Outcomes in Clinical Trials for Multiple Sclerosis Disease-Modifying Therapies

: BACKGROUND:: The visual pathways are increasingly recognized as an ideal model to study neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis (MS). Low-contrast letter acuity (LCLA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) are validated measures of function and structure in MS. In fact, LCLA was the topic of a recent review by the Multiple Sclerosis Outcome Assessments Consortium (MSOAC) to qualify this visual measure as a primary or secondary clinical trial endpoint with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and other regulatory agencies. This review focuses on the use of LCLA and OCT measures as outcomes in clinical trials to date of MS disease-modifying therapies.

METHODS

A Pubmed search using the specific key words "optical coherence tomography," "low-contrast letter acuity," "multiple sclerosis," and "clinical trials" was performed. An additional search on the clinicaltrials.gov website with the same key words was used to find registered clinical trials of MS therapies that included these visual outcome measures.

RESULTS

As demonstrated by multiple clinical trials, LCLA and OCT measures are sensitive to treatment effects in MS. LCLA has been used in many clinical trials to date, and findings suggest that 7 letters of LCLA at the 2.5% contrast level are meaningful change. Few clinical trials using the benefits of OCT have been performed, although results of observational studies have solidified the ability of OCT to assess change in retinal structure. Continued accrual of clinical trial and observational data is needed to validate the use of OCT in clinical trials, but preliminary work suggests that an intereye difference in retinal nerve fiber layer thickness of 5-6 μm is a clinically meaningful threshold that identifies an optic nerve lesion in MS.

CONCLUSIONS

Visual impairment represents a significant component of overall disability in MS. LCLA and OCT enhance the detection of visual pathway injury and can be used as measures of axonal and neuronal integrity. Continued investigation is ongoing to further incorporate these vision-based assessments into clinical trials of MS therapies.

Prospective phase II clinical trial of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplant for treatment refractory multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) has been explored as a therapeutic intervention in multiple sclerosis (MS) over the last two decades; however, prospective clinical trials of the most common myeloablative conditioning regimen, BEAM, are limited. Furthermore, patient selection, optimal chemotherapeutic regimen and immunological changes associated with disease response require ongoing exploration. We present the outcomes, safety and immune reconstitution (IR) of patients with active, treatment refractory MS.

METHODS

This study was a single-centre, phase II clinical trial of AHSCT for patients with active relapsing remitting (RRMS) and secondary progressive MS (SPMS). Patients underwent AHSCT using BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan)+antithymocyte globulin chemotherapeutic regimen.

OUTCOMES

The primary outcome was event-free survival (EFS); defined as no clinical or radiological relapses and no disability progression. Multiparameter flow cytometry was performed for evaluation of post-transplant IR in both MS and lymphoma patients receiving the same chemotherapy regimen.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients (20 RRMS, 15 SPMS) completed AHSCT, with a median follow-up of 36 months (range 12-66). The median Expanded Disability Status Scores (EDSS) was 6 (2-7) and patients had failed a median of 4 (2-7) disease modifying therapies. 66% failed treatment with natalizumab. EFS at 3 years was 60%, (70% RRMS). Sustained improvement in EDSS was seen in 15 (44%) of patients. There was no treatment-related mortality. A sustained rise in CD39⁺ T regulatory cells, immunosuppressive CD56^hi natural killer cells and ablation of proinflammatory mucosal-associated invariant T cells was seen for 12 months following AHSCT in patients with MS. These changes did not occur in patients with lymphoma receiving the same chemotherapy for AHSCT.

CONCLUSIONS

The EFS in our MS cohort is significantly greater than other high-efficacy immunosuppressive therapies and similar to other AHSCT studies despite a more heavily pretreated cohort.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12613000339752.

Evolution of clinical trials in multiple sclerosis

Clinical trials have advanced the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) by demonstrating the safety and efficacy of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). This review discusses major changes to MS clinical trials in the era of DMTs. As treatment options for MS continue to increase, patients in modern MS trials present earlier and with milder disease compared with historic MS populations. While placebo-controlled trials for some questions may still be relevant, DMT trials in relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS) are no longer ethical. The replacement of the placebo arm by an active comparator arm in trials have raised the cost of trials by requiring larger sample sizes to detect on-study changes in treatment effects. Efforts to improve trial efficiency in RRMS have focused on exploring adaptive designs and relying on sensitive magnetic resonance imaging measures of disease activity. In trials for progressive forms of MS (PMS), the lack of sensitive outcome measures that can be used in shorter-term trials have delayed the development of effective treatments. Recent shifting of the focus to advancing trials in PMS has identified paraclinical outcome measurements with improved potential, and the testing of agents for neuroprotection and remyelination is in progress.

Immunopathological Factors Associated with Disability in Multiple Sclerosis

In multiple sclerosis (MS), disability occurs as a result of complex interactions between glial cells and diverse components of acquired immunity. Microglial cells significantly contribute to disability progression by re-activating infiltrating lymphocytes, releasing neuro- and oligodendrocytotoxic mediators, inducing oxidative stress, and interfering with neuroplasticity. Recent research has emphasized the significance of meningeal B cell infiltrates in development of cognitive decline and disability. B cells are also involved in disability progression by way of production of neurotoxic antibodies directed against axoglial antigens. Among several immunological factors, neurofilament light chain antibodies, IgM-type oligoclonal bands, complement factor C3, and microglia-derived mediators stick out as potential reliable predictors of disability progression in MS patients. Better understanding of the interactions between innate immunity and neuroaxonal degeneration may result in development of novel and effective therapeutics for progressive types of MS.

Oral Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis treatment faces tremendous changes owing to the approval of new medications, some of which are available as oral formulations. Until now, the four orally available medications, fingolimod, dimethylfumarate (BG-12), teriflunomide, and cladribine have received market authorization, whereas laquinimod is still under development. Fingolimod is a sphingosine-1-phosphate inhibitor, which is typically used as escalation therapy and leads to up to 60% reduction of the annualized relapse rate, but might also have neuroprotective properties. In addition, there are three more specific S1P agonists in late stages of development: siponimod, ponesimod, and ozanimod. Dimethylfumarate has immunomodulatory and cytoprotective functions and is used as baseline therapy. Teriflunomide, the active metabolite of the rheumatoid arthritis medication leflunomide, targets the dihydroorotate dehydrogenase, thus inhibiting the proliferation of lymphocytes by depletion of pyrimidines. Here we will review the mechanisms of action, clinical trial data, as well as data about safety and tolerability of the compounds.

Novel uses of retinal imaging with optical coherence tomography in multiple sclerosis

Introduction: Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is the most common chronic autoimmune neuroinflammatory condition in young adults. It is often accompanied by optic neuritis (ON) and retinal neuro-axonal damage causing visual disturbances. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a sensitive non-invasive method for quantifying intraretinal layer volumes. Recently, OCT not only showed to be a reliable marker for ON-associated damage, but also proved its high prognostic value for functional outcome and disability accrual in patients with MS. Consequently, OCT is discussed as a potential marker for monitoring disease severity and therapeutic response in individual patients. Areas covered: This article summarizes our current understanding of structural retinal changes in MS and describes the future potential of OCT for differential diagnosis, monitoring of the disease course and for clinical trials. Expert commentary: Today, OCT is used in clinical practice in specialized MS centers. Standardized parameters across devices are urgently needed for supporting clinical utility. Novel parameters are desirable to increase sensitivity and specificity in terms of MS.

Monitoring Progressive Multiple Sclerosis with Novel Imaging Techniques

Imaging markers for monitoring disease progression in progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS) are scarce, thereby limiting the possibility to monitor disease evolution and to test effective treatments in clinical trials. Advanced imaging techniques that have the advantage of metrics with increased sensitivity to short-term tissue changes and increased specificity to the structural abnormalities characteristic of PMS have recently been applied in clinical trials of PMS. In this review, we (1) provide an overview of the pathological features of PMS, (2) summarize the findings of research and clinical trials conducted in PMS which have applied conventional and advanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques and (3) discuss recent advancements and future perspectives in monitoring PMS with imaging techniques.

Impact of trial design and patient heterogeneity on the identification of clinically effective therapies for progressive MS

Clinically effective immunomodulatory therapies have been developed for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), but they have generally not translated to a corresponding slowing of disability accumulation in progressive forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). Since disability is multifaceted, progressive patients are heterogeneous, and the drivers of disease progression are still unclear, it has been difficult to identify the most informative outcome measures for progressive trials. Historically, secondary outcome measures have focused on inflammatory measures, which contributed to the recent identification of immunomodulatory therapies benefiting younger patients with more inflammatory progressive MS. Meanwhile, agents capable of treating late-stage disease have remained elusive. Consequently, measures of neurodegeneration are becoming common. Here, we review completed clinical trials testing immunomodulatory therapies in primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) or secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) and discuss the features contributing to trial design variability in relation to trial outcomes, and how efforts toward better patient stratification and inclusion of reliable progression markers could improve outcomes.

Phase 2 Trial of Ibudilast in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

BACKGROUND

There are limited treatments for progressive multiple sclerosis. Ibudilast inhibits several cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases, macrophage migration inhibitory factor, and toll-like receptor 4 and can cross the blood-brain barrier, with potential salutary effects in progressive multiple sclerosis.

METHODS

We enrolled patients with primary or secondary progressive multiple sclerosis in a phase 2 randomized trial of oral ibudilast (≤100 mg daily) or placebo for 96 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the rate of brain atrophy, as measured by the brain parenchymal fraction (brain size relative to the volume of the outer surface contour of the brain). Major secondary end points included the change in the pyramidal tracts on diffusion tensor imaging, the magnetization transfer ratio in normal-appearing brain tissue, the thickness of the retinal nerve-fiber layer, and cortical atrophy, all measures of tissue damage in multiple sclerosis.

RESULTS

Of 255 patients who underwent randomization, 129 were assigned to ibudilast and 126 to placebo. A total of 53% of the patients in the ibudilast group and 52% of those in the placebo group had primary progressive disease; the others had secondary progressive disease. The rate of change in the brain parenchymal fraction was -0.0010 per year with ibudilast and -0.0019 per year with placebo (difference, 0.0009; 95% confidence interval, 0.00004 to 0.0017; P=0.04), which represents approximately 2.5 ml less brain-tissue loss with ibudilast over a period of 96 weeks. Adverse events with ibudilast included gastrointestinal symptoms, headache, and depression.

CONCLUSIONS

In a phase 2 trial involving patients with progressive multiple sclerosis, ibudilast was associated with slower progression of brain atrophy than placebo but was associated with higher rates of gastrointestinal side effects, headache, and depression. (Funded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and others; NN102/SPRINT-MS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01982942 .).

Scan-rescan repeatability and cross-scanner comparability of DTI metrics in healthy subjects in the SPRINT-MS multicenter trial

PURPOSE

To assess intrascanner repeatability and cross-scanner comparability for diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metrics in a multicenter clinical trial.

METHODS

DTI metrics (including longitudinal diffusivity [LD], fractional anisotropy [FA], mean diffusivity [MD], and transverse diffusivity [TD]) from pyramidal tracts for healthy controls were calculated from images acquired on twenty-seven 3T MR scanners (Siemens and GE) with 6 different scanner models and 7 different software versions as part of the NN102/SPRINT-MS clinical trial. Each volunteer underwent two scanning sessions on the same scanner. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and signal-to-noise floor ratio (SNFR) were also assessed.

RESULTS

DTI metrics showed good scan-rescan repeatability. There were no significant differences between scans and rescans in LD, FA, MD, or TD values. Although the cross-scanner coefficient of variation (CV) values for all DTI metrics were <5.7%, significant differences were observed for LD (p < 3.3e-5) and FA (p < 0.0024) when GE scanners were compared with Siemens scanners. Significant differences were also observed for SNR when comparing GE scanners and Siemens Skyra scanners (p < 1.4e-7) and when comparing Siemens Skyra scanners and TIM Trio scanners (p < 1.0e-10). Analysis of background signal also demonstrated differences between GE and Siemens scanners in terms of signal statistics. The measured signal intensity from a background noise region of interest was significantly higher for GE scanners than for Siemens scanners (p < 1.2e-12). Significant differences were also observed for SNFR when comparing GE scanners and Siemens Skyra scanners (p < 2.5e-11), GE scanners and Siemens Trio scanners (p < 7.5e-11), and Siemens Skyra scanners and TIM Trio scanners (p < 2.5e-9).

CONCLUSIONS

The good repeatability of the DTI metrics among the 27 scanners used in this study confirms the feasibility of combining DTI data from multiple centers using high angular resolution sequences. Our observations support the feasibility of longitudinal multicenter clinical trials using DTI outcome measures. The noise floor level and SNFR are important parameters that must be assessed when comparing studies that used different scanner models.

Technical Note: Retrospective reduction in systematic differences across scanner changes by accounting for noise floor effects in diffusion tensor imaging

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine if retrospective correction for noise floor effects can reduce systematic differences and improve reproducibility across major scanner changes. Changes in scanner configuration can negatively impact quantitative MRI studies by introducing systematic differences between measurements that are due to the instrument, not biology. Noise floor rectification is a potential source of systematic differences in diffusion tensor imaging (DTI).

METHODS

Healthy volunteers were scanned before and after a major scanner change at four sites. DTI-based measures of tissue microstructure were calculated using a standard approach that ignores noise floor effects and using a maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) approach that accounts for the noise floor. Voxelwise estimates of systematic differences and reproducibility were evaluated.

RESULTS

Accounting for noise floor effects can reduce the extent of systematic differences and can improve reproducibility. However, when signal levels are high, accounting for the noise floor can have a deleterious effect. An empirical metric constructed to reflect the magnitude of noise floor effects signal-to-noise-floor ratio (SNFR). The MLE approach improves reproducibility for SNFR < 3.

CONCLUSIONS

Accounting for noise floor effects can boost the robustness of DTI measurements in the presence of scanner changes, potentially improving the reliability of DTI for studies of neurological disease.

Advancing trial design in progressive multiple sclerosis

The failure of a majority of clinical trials in progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) has highlighted the need to reconsider how these trials are designed and conducted, and many areas deserve focus. Basic scientists are reconceptualising the pathophysiology of progressive MS into three broad areas: systemic inflammation, compartmentalized inflammation and non-inflammatory neurodegeneration, with the latter two becoming predominant as the disease progresses. This framework will guide the choice of experimental therapies. Previous clinical trials have highlighted how participant selection can have a significant impact on study outcome. Phase 2 biomarkers which are biologically stable, dynamically changing over time, and easy to assess in multi-centre studies are greatly needed. Shortcomings inherent in the Expanded Disability Status Scale are prompting the development and validation of better clinical measures. The standard two-arm, fixed-duration trial paradigm has been challenged with new, innovative approaches that can test more therapies efficiently. International collaboratives such as the Progressive MS Alliance will support increased dialogue with regulators, industry and other funding agencies. Better engagement with people living with progressive MS will transform them from simply being the recipient of MS therapies to partners in the search for new treatments. Focused, targeted action will drive further development of effective therapies for progressive MS.

Progressive MS trials: Lessons learned

Up to very recently, no treatments had proved effective in progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). In 2016, four drugs, two tested in phase 3 and two in phase 2 trials, showed a beneficial effect in primary or secondary progressive MS. Although this could indicate a turning point in progressive MS treatment, most of these successes have been modest and mainly restricted to patients with active inflammation, in the context of trials with powerful anti-inflammatory agents. This paper summarises these reasons, particularly focusing on the main lessons learned for the design of future trials. First, a drug's mechanism of action should tackle the specific pathogenic mechanisms that characterise progressive MS. Second, trial populations where new drugs are to be tested should be carefully chosen, possibly including younger patients with shorter disease durations, which have greater chances of showing active deterioration during the trial, therefore increasing the power to detect treatment effects. Third, outcome measures used in future phase 2 and phase 3 trials should be highly sensitive and be accompanied by smart trial designs.

Pharmacotherapy in Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: An Overview

Multiple sclerosis is an immune-mediated inflammatory disease of the central nervous system characterised by demyelination, neuroaxonal loss and a heterogeneous clinical course. Multiple sclerosis presents with different phenotypes, most commonly a relapsing-remitting course and, less frequently, a progressive accumulation of disability from disease onset (primary progressive multiple sclerosis). The majority of people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, after a variable time, switch to a stage characterised by gradual neurological worsening known as secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. We have a limited understanding of the mechanisms underlying multiple sclerosis, and it is believed that multiple genetic, environmental and endogenous factors are elements driving inflammation and ultimately neurodegeneration. Axonal loss and grey matter damage have been regarded as amongst the leading causes of irreversible neurological disability in the progressive stages. There are over a dozen disease-modifying therapies currently licenced for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, but none of these has provided evidence of effectiveness in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Recently, there has been some early modest success with siponimod in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis and ocrelizumab in primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Finding treatments to delay or prevent the courses of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis is an unmet and essential goal of the research in multiple sclerosis. In this review, we discuss new findings regarding drugs with immunomodulatory, neuroprotective or regenerative properties and possible treatment strategies for secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. We examine the field broadly to include trials where participants have progressive or relapsing phenotypes. We summarise the most relevant results from newer investigations from phase II and III randomised controlled trials over the past decade, with particular attention to the last 5 years.

ECTRIMS/ACTRIMS 2017: Closing in on neurorepair in progressive multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

While there is now a multitude of potent medications for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), effective therapies targeting neurodegeneration in progressive multiple sclerosis types are still lacking. Stimulation of neurorepair in this disease remains a pathogenetically defined treatment goal. However, therapeutic progress is slowed by the still inadequate tool set to capture "regeneration/repair" in MS and to define appropriate outcomes in clinical trials.

OBJECTIVES

In this review, we discuss studies investigating promising regenerative agents for progressive MS which were recently presented during the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS)/Americas Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ACTRIMS) 2017 meeting in Paris.

Challenge of progressive multiple sclerosis therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Understanding the mechanisms underlying progression in multiple sclerosis (MS) and identifying appropriate therapeutic targets is a key challenge facing the MS community. This challenge has been championed internationally by organizations such as the Progressive MS Alliance, which has raised the profile of progressive MS and identified the key obstacles to treatment. This review will outline the considerable progress against these challenges.

RECENT FINDINGS

New insights into mechanisms underlying progression have opened up potential therapeutic opportunities. This has been complemented by ongoing validation of clinical and imaging outcomes for Phase II trials of progression, coupled with the development of innovative trial designs. The field has been greatly encouraged by recent positive Phase III trials in both primary and secondary progressive MS, albeit with modest benefit. Early trials of neuroprotection and repair have provided important new data with which to drive the field. Improving symptom management and advancing rehabilitation approaches, critical for this patient population which, taken together with identifying and managing comorbidities and risk factors, has an appreciable impact on health-related quality of life.

SUMMARY

Raising the profile of progressive MS has resulted in the first effective treatments with the promise of more to come.

Imaging outcome measures for progressive multiple sclerosis trials

Imaging markers that are reliable, reproducible and sensitive to neurodegenerative changes in progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) can enhance the development of new medications with a neuroprotective mode-of-action. Accordingly, in recent years, a considerable number of imaging biomarkers have been included in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials in primary and secondary progressive MS. Brain lesion count and volume are markers of inflammation and demyelination and are important outcomes even in progressive MS trials. Brain and, more recently, spinal cord atrophy are gaining relevance, considering their strong association with disability accrual; ongoing improvements in analysis methods will enhance their applicability in clinical trials, especially for cord atrophy. Advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques (e.g. magnetization transfer ratio (MTR), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), spectroscopy) have been included in few trials so far and hold promise for the future, as they can reflect specific pathological changes targeted by neuroprotective treatments. Positron emission tomography (PET) and optical coherence tomography have yet to be included. Applications, limitations and future perspectives of these techniques in clinical trials in progressive MS are discussed, with emphasis on measurement sensitivity, reliability and sample size calculation.

The Role of Advanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques in Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Trials

Magnetic resonance imaging has been crucial in the development of anti-inflammatory disease-modifying treatments. The current landscape of multiple sclerosis clinical trials is currently expanding to include testing not only of anti-inflammatory agents, but also neuroprotective, remyelinating, neuromodulating, and restorative therapies. This is especially true of therapies targeting progressive forms of the disease where neurodegeneration is a prominent feature. Imaging techniques of the brain and spinal cord have rapidly evolved in the last decade to permit in vivo characterization of tissue microstructural changes, connectivity, metabolic changes, neuronal loss, glial activity, and demyelination. Advanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques hold significant promise for accelerating the development of different treatment modalities targeting a variety of pathways in MS.

CNS inflammation and neurodegeneration

There is an increasing recognition that inflammation plays a critical role in neurodegenerative diseases of the CNS, including Alzheimer's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, and the prototypic neuroinflammatory disease multiple sclerosis (MS). Differential immune responses involving the adaptive versus the innate immune system are observed at various stages of neurodegenerative diseases, and may not only drive disease processes but could serve as therapeutic targets. Ongoing investigations into the specific inflammatory mechanisms that play roles in disease causation and progression have revealed lessons about inflammation-driven neurodegeneration that can be applied to other neurodegenerative diseases. An increasing number of immunotherapeutic strategies that have been successful in MS are now being applied to other neurodegenerative diseases. Some approaches suppress CNS immune mechanisms, while others harness the immune system to clear deleterious products and cells. This Review focuses on the mechanisms by which inflammation, mediated either by the peripheral immune response or by endogenous CNS immune mechanisms, can affect CNS neurodegeneration.