1
|
Krishnan JA, Margellos-Anast H, Kumar R, Africk JJ, Berbaum M, Bracken N, Chen YF, DeLisa J, Erwin K, Ignoffo S, Illendula SD, Kim H, Lohff C, MacTavish T, Martin MA, Mosnaim GS, Nguyen H, Norell S, Nyenhuis SM, Paik SM, Pittsenbarger Z, Press VG, Sculley J, Thompson TM, Zun L, Gerald LB, McDermott M. Coordinated Health Care Interventions for Childhood Asthma Gaps in Outcomes (CHICAGO) plan. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. GLOBAL 2023; 2:100100. [PMID: 37641662 PMCID: PMC10461791 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacig.2023.100100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
Background Evidence-based strategies to improve outcomes in minority children with uncontrolled asthma discharged from the emergency department (ED) are needed. Objectives This multicenter pragmatic clinical trial was designed to compare an ED-only intervention (decision support tool), an ED-only intervention and home visits by community health workers for 6 months (ED-plus-home), and enhanced usual care (UC). Methods Children aged 5 to 11 years with uncontrolled asthma were enrolled. The change over 6 months in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Asthma Impact Scale score in children and Satisfaction with Participation in Social Roles score in caregivers were the primary outcomes. The secondary outcomes included guideline-recommended ED discharge care and self-management. Results Recruitment was significantly lower than expected (373 vs 640 expected). Of the 373 children (64% Black and 31% Latino children), only 63% completed the 6-month follow-up visit. In multivariable analyses that accounted for missing data, the adjusted odds ratios and 98% CIs for differences in Asthma Impact Scores or caregivers' Satisfaction with Participation in Social Roles scores were not significant. However, guideline-recommended ED discharge care was significantly improved in the intervention groups versus in the UC group, and self-management behaviors were significantly improved in the ED-plus-home group versus in the ED-only and UC groups. Conclusions The ED-based interventions did not significantly improve the primary clinical outcomes, although the study was likely underpowered. Although guideline-recommended ED discharge care and self-management did improve, their effect on clinical outcomes needs further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerry A. Krishnan
- Office of the Vice Chancellor for Health Affairs, University of Illinois Chicago
- Department of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago
| | | | - Rajesh Kumar
- Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University and Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago
| | | | - Michael Berbaum
- Center for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Illinois Chicago
| | - Nina Bracken
- Department of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago
| | - Yi-Fan Chen
- Center for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Illinois Chicago
| | - Julie DeLisa
- Department of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago
| | - Kim Erwin
- Office of the Vice Chancellor for Health Affairs, University of Illinois Chicago
| | - Stacy Ignoffo
- Sinai Urban Health Institute, Sinai Health System, Chicago
| | | | - Hajwa Kim
- Center for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Illinois Chicago
| | | | - Tom MacTavish
- Institute of Design, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago
| | | | | | - Hannah Nguyen
- Department of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago
| | - Sarah Norell
- Office of the Vice Chancellor for Health Affairs, University of Illinois Chicago
| | | | - S. Margaret Paik
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago Medicine Comer Children’s Hospital
| | - Zachary Pittsenbarger
- Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University and Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago
| | - Valerie G. Press
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago Medicine Comer Children’s Hospital
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine
| | - Jennifer Sculley
- Office of the Vice Chancellor for Health Affairs, University of Illinois Chicago
| | - Trevonne M. Thompson
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Cook County Health and Hospitals System, Chicago
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago
| | - Leslie Zun
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Psychiatry, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, Chicago Medical School
| | - Lynn B. Gerald
- Office of the Vice Chancellor for Health Affairs, University of Illinois Chicago
- Department of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dy T, Hamilton WJ, Kramer CB, Apter A, Krishnan JA, Stout JW, Teach SJ, Federman A, Elder J, Bryant-Stephens T, Bruhl RJ, Jackson S, Sumino K. Stakeholder engagement in eight comparative effectiveness trials in African Americans and Latinos with asthma. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2022; 8:63. [PMID: 36434672 PMCID: PMC9694541 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-022-00399-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effects of stakeholder engagement, particularly in comparative effectiveness trials, have not been widely reported. In 2014, eight comparative effectiveness studies targeting African Americans and Hispanics/Latinos with uncontrolled asthma were funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) as part of its Addressing Disparities Program. Awardees were required to meaningfully involve patients and other stakeholders. Using specific examples, we describe how these stakeholders substantially changed the research protocols and in other ways participated meaningfully as full partners in the development and conduct of the eight studies. METHODS Using the method content analysis of cases, we identified themes regarding the types of stakeholders, methods of engagement, input from the stakeholders, changes made to the research protocols and processes, and perceived benefits and challenges of the engagement process. We used summaries from meetings of the eight teams, results from an engagement survey, and the final research reports as our data source to obtain detailed information. The descriptive data were assessed by multiple reviewers using inductive and deductive qualitative methods and discussed in the context of engagement literature. RESULTS Stakeholders participated in the planning, conduct, and dissemination phases of all eight asthma studies. All the studies included clinicians and community representatives as stakeholders. Other stakeholders included patients with asthma, their caregivers, advocacy organizations, and health-system representatives. Engagement was primarily by participation in advisory boards, although six of the eight studies (75%) also utilized focus groups and one-on-one interviews. Difficulty finding a time and location to meet was the most reported challenge to engagement, noted by four of the eight teams (50%). Other reported challenges and barriers to engagement included recruitment of stakeholders, varying levels of enthusiasm among stakeholders, controlling power dynamics, and ensuring that stakeholder involvement was reflected and had true influence on the project. CONCLUSION Engagement-driven modifications led to specific changes in study design and conduct that were felt to have increased enrollment and the general level of trust and support of the targeted communities. The level of interaction described, between investigators and stakeholders in each study and between investigator-stakeholder groups, is-we believe-unprecedented and may provide useful guidance for other studies seeking to improve the effectiveness of community-driven research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany Dy
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, 660 S. Euclid Ave, CB 8122, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
| | - Winifred J Hamilton
- Environmental Health Service, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Andrea Apter
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jerry A Krishnan
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep, and Allergy, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago and Population Health Sciences Program, University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - James W Stout
- Department of Pediatrics and Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Stephen J Teach
- Division of Emergency Medicine and the Department of Pediatrics, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Alex Federman
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - John Elder
- Institute for Behavioral and Community Health, School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Tyra Bryant-Stephens
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Rebecca J Bruhl
- Environmental Health Service, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shawni Jackson
- Division of General Medical Sciences, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Kaharu Sumino
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lowe D, Ryan R, Schonfeld L, Merner B, Walsh L, Graham-Wisener L, Hill S. Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 9:CD013373. [PMID: 34523117 PMCID: PMC8440158 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013373.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health services have traditionally been developed to focus on specific diseases or medical specialties. Involving consumers as partners in planning, delivering and evaluating health services may lead to services that are person-centred and so better able to meet the needs of and provide care for individuals. Globally, governments recommend consumer involvement in healthcare decision-making at the systems level, as a strategy for promoting person-centred health services. However, the effects of this 'working in partnership' approach to healthcare decision-making are unclear. Working in partnership is defined here as collaborative relationships between at least one consumer and health provider, meeting jointly and regularly in formal group formats, to equally contribute to and collaborate on health service-related decision-making in real time. In this review, the terms 'consumer' and 'health provider' refer to partnership participants, and 'health service user' and 'health service provider' refer to trial participants. This review of effects of partnership interventions was undertaken concurrently with a Cochrane Qualitative Evidence Synthesis (QES) entitled Consumers and health providers working in partnership for the promotion of person-centred health services: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership, as an intervention to promote person-centred health services. SEARCH METHODS We searched the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL databases from 2000 to April 2019; PROQUEST Dissertations and Theses Global from 2016 to April 2019; and grey literature and online trial registries from 2000 until September 2019. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, and cluster-RCTs of 'working in partnership' interventions meeting these three criteria: both consumer and provider participants meet; they meet jointly and regularly in formal group formats; and they make actual decisions that relate to the person-centredness of health service(s). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently screened most titles and abstracts. One review author screened a subset of titles and abstracts (i.e. those identified through clinical trials registries searches, those classified by the Cochrane RCT Classifier as unlikely to be an RCT, and those identified through other sources). Two review authors independently screened all full texts of potentially eligible articles for inclusion. In case of disagreement, they consulted a third review author to reach consensus. One review author extracted data and assessed risk of bias for all included studies and a second review author independently cross-checked all data and assessments. Any discrepancies were resolved by discussion, or by consulting a third review author to reach consensus. Meta-analysis was not possible due to the small number of included trials and their heterogeneity; we synthesised results descriptively by comparison and outcome. We reported the following outcomes in GRADE 'Summary of findings' tables: health service alterations; the degree to which changed service reflects health service user priorities; health service users' ratings of health service performance; health service users' health service utilisation patterns; resources associated with the decision-making process; resources associated with implementing decisions; and adverse events. MAIN RESULTS We included five trials (one RCT and four cluster-RCTs), with 16,257 health service users and more than 469 health service providers as trial participants. For two trials, the aims of the partnerships were to directly improve the person-centredness of health services (via health service planning, and discharge co-ordination). In the remaining trials, the aims were indirect (training first-year medical doctors on patient safety) or broader in focus (which could include person-centredness of health services that targeted the public/community, households or health service delivery to improve maternal and neonatal mortality). Three trials were conducted in high income-countries, one was in a middle-income country and one was in a low-income country. Two studies evaluated working in partnership interventions, compared to usual practice without partnership (Comparison 1); and three studies evaluated working in partnership as part of a multi-component intervention, compared to the same intervention without partnership (Comparison 2). No studies evaluated one form of working in partnership compared to another (Comparison 3). The effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership compared to usual practice without partnership are uncertain: only one of the two studies that assessed this comparison measured health service alteration outcomes, and data were not usable, as only intervention group data were reported. Additionally, none of the included studies evaluating this comparison measured the other primary or secondary outcomes we sought for the 'Summary of findings' table. We are also unsure about the effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership as part of a multi-component intervention compared to the same intervention without partnership. Very low-certainty evidence indicated there may be little or no difference on health service alterations or health service user health service performance ratings (two studies); or on health service user health service utilisation patterns and adverse events (one study each). No studies evaluating this comparison reported the degree to which health service alterations reflect health service user priorities, or resource use. Overall, our confidence in the findings about the effects of working in partnership interventions was very low due to indirectness, imprecision and publication bias, and serious concerns about risk of selection bias; performance bias, detection bias and reporting bias in most studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The effects of consumers and providers working in partnership as an intervention, or as part of a multi-component intervention, are uncertain, due to a lack of high-quality evidence and/or due to a lack of studies. Further well-designed RCTs with a clear focus on assessing outcomes directly related to partnerships for patient-centred health services are needed in this area, which may also benefit from mixed-methods and qualitative research to build the evidence base.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dianne Lowe
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
| | - Rebecca Ryan
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
| | - Lina Schonfeld
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
| | - Bronwen Merner
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
| | - Louisa Walsh
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
| | | | - Sophie Hill
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shaak S, Brown K, Reichart C, Zimmerman D. Community health workers providing asthma education. J Asthma 2020; 59:572-579. [PMID: 33351650 DOI: 10.1080/02770903.2020.1862184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: Children living in urban areas experience disproportionate rates of asthma. Substandard housing conditions in some urban areas contribute to greater exposure to household asthma triggers. This article examines the geographic connection between pediatric asthma and substandard housing in one mid-sized city in Pennsylvania and the effectiveness of a home-based Community Health Worker (CHW) intervention targeted at this high-risk area to improve families' abilities to manage their children's asthma.Methods: The CHWs provided education and resources to families of children diagnosed with mild, moderate or severe persistent asthma. A pre and post-test design was implemented to evaluate if the CHW intervention improved the family's ability to successfully manage their child's asthma. Eighty-one patients completed the program over a six-month period.Results: Results showed significant improvements in the areas of asthma knowledge, fewer missed days of school, fewer days with asthma symptoms, reduction in wheezing and fewer sleep disturbances. There was also a significant decrease in the number of Emergency Department visits and hospital days.Conclusions: By teaching asthma management skills and by addressing in-home triggers, home-based CHW led interventions can be an affordable and effective way for caregivers and children with asthma to improve asthma management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Shaak
- Department of Community Health, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA, USA
| | - Kimberly Brown
- Department of Pediatrics, Lehigh Valley Reilly Children's Hospital, Allentown, PA, USA
| | - Christine Reichart
- Department of Community Health, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA, USA
| | - David Zimmerman
- Department of Community Health, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bruhl RJ, Perkison WB, Hanania NA, McNeill LH, Oluyomi AO, Fiesinger EB, Minard CG, Solomon A, Hamilton WJ, Butler B, Caldwell J, Crosby E, Davis C, Galvan H, Harris R, Lacour-Chestnut F, Martin C, Pannell S, Phipps K, Richardson G, Solomon A, White W, Boles J, Rangel A, Virk R, Brock M, Guffey D, Ramamurthy U, Persse D, Maffei S, Chan W, Reyes B. Design of a home-based intervention for Houston-area African-American adults with asthma: Methods and lessons learned from a pragmatic randomized trial. Contemp Clin Trials 2020; 91:105977. [PMID: 32151753 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.105977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2019] [Revised: 02/24/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
A growing body of evidence demonstrates that home-based, multicomponent interventions can effectively reduce exposures to asthma triggers and decrease asthma symptoms. However, few of these studies have targeted adults. To address this and other research gaps, we designed and implemented a pragmatic randomized clinical trial, the Houston Home-based Integrated Intervention Targeting Better Asthma Control (HIITBAC) for African Americans, to assess the effectiveness of a home-based intervention to improve asthma control and quality of life in African-American adults-a population disproportionately affected by asthma. The primary goals were to help participants reduce allergens and irritants in their homes and better manage their disease through knowledge, improved medication use, and behavior change. HIITBAC had two groups: clinic-only and home-visit groups. Both groups received enhanced clinical care, but the home-visit group also received a detailed home assessment and four additional home visits spaced over roughly one year. We recruited 263 participants. Of these, 152 (57.8%) were recruited through electronic health record data, 51 (19.4%) through Emergency Medical Services data, and 60 (22.8%) through other efforts (e.g., emergency departments, community events, outreach). Seventy participants (26.6%) were lost to follow up, substantially more in the home-visit than in the clinic-only group. We describe the HIITBAC methodology and cohort, discuss lessons learned about recruitment and retention, and highlight adaptations we implemented to address these lessons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Jensen Bruhl
- Environmental Health Service, Department of Family & Community Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.
| | - William Brett Perkison
- Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics and Environmental Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Nicola A Hanania
- Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Lorna H McNeill
- Department of Health Disparities Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Abiodun O Oluyomi
- Section of Epidemiology and Population Science, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Ellen Baskin Fiesinger
- Department of Management, Policy and Community Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Charles G Minard
- Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Abida Solomon
- College of Nursing, Prairie View A&M University, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Winifred J Hamilton
- Environmental Health Service, Department of Family & Community Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Brian Butler
- HIITBAC Patient/Stakeholder Advisory Board, Houston, TX, United States
| | - James Caldwell
- HIITBAC Patient/Stakeholder Advisory Board, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Eunice Crosby
- HIITBAC Patient/Stakeholder Advisory Board, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Cellie Davis
- HIITBAC Patient/Stakeholder Advisory Board, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Hope Galvan
- HIITBAC Patient/Stakeholder Advisory Board, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Rachel Harris
- HIITBAC Patient/Stakeholder Advisory Board, Houston, TX, United States
| | | | - Carol Martin
- HIITBAC Patient/Stakeholder Advisory Board, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Shereda Pannell
- HIITBAC Patient/Stakeholder Advisory Board, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Kathy Phipps
- HIITBAC Patient/Stakeholder Advisory Board, Houston, TX, United States
| | | | - Adriene Solomon
- HIITBAC Patient/Stakeholder Advisory Board, Houston, TX, United States
| | - William White
- HIITBAC Patient/Stakeholder Advisory Board, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Jamie Boles
- Environmental Health Service, Department of Family & Community Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Adriana Rangel
- Environmental Health Service, Department of Family & Community Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Ritupreet Virk
- Environmental Health Service, Department of Family & Community Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Melissa Brock
- Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Danielle Guffey
- Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Uma Ramamurthy
- Office of Research Information Technology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - David Persse
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States; Emergency Medical Services, Houston Fire Department, City of Houston, TX, United States
| | - Salvador Maffei
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Wenyaw Chan
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Brenda Reyes
- U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development, Washington, DC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Martin MA, Kapheim MG, Erwin K, Ignoffo S, McMahon K, OʼRourke A, Gerald LB, Barrett M, Press VG, Darabi H, Krishnan JA. Childhood Asthma Disparities in Chicago: Developing Approaches to Health Inequities. FAMILY & COMMUNITY HEALTH 2018; 41:135-145. [PMID: 29781915 PMCID: PMC5965690 DOI: 10.1097/fch.0000000000000187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
We conducted a needs assessment to develop an evidence-based, locally tailored asthma care implementation plan for high-risk children with asthma in Chicago. Our team of health policy experts, clinicians, researchers, and designers included extensive stakeholder engagement (N = 162) in a mixed-methods community needs assessment. Results showed the lines of communication and collaboration across sectors were weak; caregivers were the only consistent force and could not always manage this burden. A series of recommendations for interventions and how to implement and measure them were generated. Cooperative, multidisciplinary efforts grounded in the community can target wicked problems such as asthma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly A Martin
- Department of Pediatrics (Dr Martin), College of Engineering (Dr Darabi), and University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System Population Health Sciences Program (Dr Krishnan), University of Illinois at Chicago; Sinai Health System, Sinai Urban Health Institute, Chicago, Illinois (Ms Kapheim); Institute of Design, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago (Ms Erwin); Chicago Asthma Consortium, Chicago, Illinois (Ms Ignoffo); Respiratory Health Association, Chicago, Illinois (Mss McMahon, and O'Rourke); Department of Health Promotion Sciences, College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson (Dr Gerald); Propeller Health, San Francisco, California (Dr Barrett); and Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Illinois (Dr Press)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Benjamin LS, Carney MM. Furthering the Value of the Emergency Department Beyond Its Walls: Transitions to the Medical Home for Pediatric Emergency Patients. CLINICAL PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cpem.2018.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
|
8
|
Martin MA, Press VG, Erwin K, Margellos-Anast H, Ignoffo S, McMahon KS, Mosnaim G, Ramsay J, Paik SM. Engaging end-users in intervention research study design. J Asthma 2018; 55:483-491. [PMID: 28699825 PMCID: PMC8350842 DOI: 10.1080/02770903.2017.1342256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Coordinated Healthcare Interventions for Childhood Asthma Gaps in Outcomes (CHICAGO) Plan is a 3-arm multicenter pragmatic trial to evaluate asthma interventions in high-risk Chicago children presenting to emergency departments (ED) with asthma. A formative evaluation with end-users to provide input into the trial design and outcome instruments was conducted prior to trial initiation. METHODS A multi-level data gathering framework from the field of design and standard qualitative methods was employed. This included one focus group with asthma Community Health Workers (N = 8), two focus groups with caregivers of children with asthma (N = 9), in-home interviews with caregivers (N = 9), key informant interviews at six EDs and outpatient clinical sites (N = 19), and ED tours and observations (N = 6). Data were presented, discussed, and organized into themes. RESULTS Data indicated that changes to the study design and discharge tool were warranted. A key insight was that ED discharge protocols typically place patient education at a single inopportune time, as families are preparing to leave the ED. At this point in time, families are less receptive to education due to fatigue and a desire to expedite the discharge process. The trial design was modified to reposition the discharge asthma plan to occur at earlier "teachable moments." Delivery of the asthma discharge plan was assigned to study-employed ED coordinators instead of ED providers and staff. Other potential challenges to study recruitment and implementation were raised and addressed. CONCLUSIONS Engagement of end-users in the design phase of implementation research is critical to improve research feasibility and relevance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly A Martin
- University of Illinois at Chicago, Department of Pediatrics, 840 South Wood Street, M/C 856, Chicago, IL, 60612
| | - Valerie G Press
- University of Chicago, Department of Medicine, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL, 60637
| | - Kim Erwin
- Illinois Institute of Technology, Institute of Design, 565 W Adams St, Chicago, IL, 60661
| | - Helen Margellos-Anast
- Sinai Urban Health Institute, Sinai Health System, 1500 S Fairfield Ave, Chicago, IL, 60608
| | - Stacy Ignoffo
- Chicago Asthma Consortium, PO Box 31757, Chicago, IL, 60631
| | | | - Giselle Mosnaim
- NorthShore University Health System, NorthShore Research Institute, 1001 University Pl, Evanston, IL, 60201
| | - Jessica Ramsay
- Sinai Urban Health Institute, Sinai Health System, 1500 S Fairfield Ave, Chicago, IL, 60608
| | - S. Margaret Paik
- University of Chicago, Department of Pediatrics, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL, 60637
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Shah AY, Dooley D, Shelef DQ, Patel SJ. Improving Asthma Outcomes in Children: From the Emergency Department and Into the Community. CLINICAL PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cpem.2018.02.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|