1
|
Ohlsen TJD, Wang H, Buchbinder D, Huang IC, Desai AD, Zheng Z, Kirchhoff AC, Park ER, Krull K, Conti RM, Yasui Y, Leisenring W, Armstrong GT, Yabroff KR, Nathan PC, Chow EJ. Financial hardship among siblings of long-term survivors of childhood cancer: A Childhood Cancer Survivor Study report. Cancer 2024; 130:1125-1136. [PMID: 38100563 PMCID: PMC10939878 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Siblings of children with cancer may experience adverse household economic consequences, but their financial outcomes in adulthood are unknown. METHODS A total of 880 siblings (aged 18-64 years) of adult-aged childhood cancer survivors were surveyed to estimate the prevalence of financial hardship by three established domains (behavioral, material, and psychological). For individual financial hardship items matching the contemporaneous National Health Interview Survey or Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, siblings were compared with the general population by calculating adjusted prevalence odds ratios (ORs) to sample-weighted responses. Multivariable logistic regression models examined associations between sibling characteristics and each hardship domain and between sibling hardship and survivors' cancer/treatment characteristics. RESULTS Behavioral, material, and psychological hardship was reported by 24%, 35%, and 28%, respectively. Compared with national survey respondents, siblings were more likely to report worries about medical bills (OR, 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.22), difficulty affording nutritious foods (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.54-2.07), and forgoing needed medical care (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.10-1.73), prescription medications (OR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.99-3.20), and dental care (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.15-1.57) because of cost. Sibling characteristics associated with reporting financial hardship in one or more domains included female sex, older age, chronic health conditions, lower income, not having health insurance, high out-of-pocket medical expenditures, and nonmedical/nonhome debt. No survivor cancer/treatment characteristics were associated with sibling financial hardship. CONCLUSIONS Adult siblings of childhood cancer survivors were more likely to experience financial hardship compared with the general population. Childhood cancer may adversely affect entire households, with potentially lasting implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy J. D. Ohlsen
- Seattle Children’s Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Huiqi Wang
- St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | | | - I-Chan Huang
- St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Arti D. Desai
- Seattle Children’s Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Anne C. Kirchhoff
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Kevin Krull
- St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Rena M. Conti
- Questrom School of Business, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yutaka Yasui
- St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | | | | | | | - Paul C. Nathan
- The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Eric J. Chow
- Seattle Children’s Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stevens J, Mills SD, Millett TJ, Lin FC, Leeman J. Design of a dual randomized trial in a type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation study. Implement Sci 2023; 18:64. [PMID: 37996884 PMCID: PMC10666326 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-023-01317-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dual randomized controlled trials (DRCT) are type 2 hybrid studies that include two randomized trials: one testing implementation strategies and one testing an intervention. We argue that this study design offers efficiency by providing rigorous investigation of both implementation and intervention in one study and has potential to accelerate generation of the evidence needed to translate interventions that work into real-world practice. Nevertheless, studies using this design are rare in the literature. MAIN TEXT We construct a paradigm that breaks down the components of the DRCT and provide a step-by-step explanation of features of the design and recommendations for use. A clear distinction is made between the dual strands that test the implementation versus the intervention, and a minimum of three randomized arms is advocated. We suggest an active treatment arm that includes both the implementation strategy and intervention that are hypothesized to be superior. We suggest two comparison/control arms: one to test the implementation strategy and the second to test the intervention. Further, we recommend selection criteria for the two control arms that place emphasis on maximizing the utility of the study design to advance public health practice. CONCLUSIONS On the surface, the design of a DRCT can appear simple, but actual application is complex. We believe it is that complexity that has limited its use in the literature. We hope that this paper will give both implementation scientists and trialists who are not familiar with implementation science a better understanding of the DRCT design and encouragement to use it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- June Stevens
- Departments of Nutrition and Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
| | - Sarah Denton Mills
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Thomas J Millett
- UTHealth Houston Institute for Implementation Science, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Feng-Chang Lin
- Department of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Jennifer Leeman
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| |
Collapse
|