Centrosome function during stem cell division: the devil is in the details.Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2008;20:694-698. [PMID: 18996192 DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2008.10.003]

Drosophila centrocortin is dispensable for centriole duplication but contributes to centrosome separation

Centrosomes are microtubule-organizing centers that duplicate exactly once to organize the bipolar mitotic spindle required for error-free mitosis. Prior work indicated that Drosophila centrocortin (cen) is required for normal centrosome separation, although a role in centriole duplication was not closely examined. Through time-lapse recordings of rapid syncytial divisions, we monitored centriole duplication and the kinetics of centrosome separation in control vs cen null embryos. Our data suggest that although cen is dispensable for centriole duplication, it contributes to centrosome separation.

Stem cells' centrosomes: How can organelles identified 130 years ago contribute to the future of regenerative medicine?

At the core of regenerative medicine lies the expectation of repair or replacement of damaged tissues or whole organs. Donor scarcity and transplant rejection are major obstacles, and exactly the obstacles that stem cell-based therapy promises to overcome. These therapies demand a comprehensive understanding of the asymmetric division of stem cells, i.e. their ability to produce cells with identical potency or differentiated cells. It is believed that with better understanding, researchers will be able to direct stem cell differentiation. Here, we describe extraordinary advances in manipulating stem cell fate that show that we need to focus on the centrosome and the centrosome-derived primary cilium. This belief comes from the fact that this organelle is the vehicle that coordinates the asymmetric division of stem cells. This is supported by studies that report the significant role of the centrosome/cilium in orchestrating signaling pathways that dictate stem cell fate. We anticipate that there is sufficient evidence to place this organelle at the center of efforts that will shape the future of regenerative medicine.

Polymorphism in miRNA target sites of CEP-63 and CEP-152 ring complex influences expression of CEP genes and favors tumorigenesis in glioma

Purpose: The present study was designed to screen the genetic polymorphisms and expression profiling of CEP-152 and CEP-63 genes in brain tumor patients. Methods: The amplification refractory mutation system PCR technique (ARMS-PCR) was used for mutation analysis using 300 blood samples of brain tumor patients and 300 overtly healthy controls. For expression analysis, 150 brain tumor tissue samples along with adjacent uninvolved/normal tissues (controls) were collected. Results: A significantly higher frequency of the mutant genotype of the CEP-152 single nucleotide polymorphism (rs2169757) and CEP-63 single nucleotide polymorphisms (rs9809619 and rs13060247) was observed in patients versus overtly healthy controls. The authors' results showed highly significant deregulation of CEP-152 (p < 0.0001) and CEP-63 (p < 0.0001) in glioma/meningioma tumor tissues versus adjacent normal tissue. Conclusion: The present study showed that variations in CEP-152 and CEP-63 genes were associated with an increased risk of brain tumor.

Centrosomes in asymmetric cell division

Asymmetric cell division (ACD) is a strategy for achieving cell diversity. Research carried out over the last two decades has shown that in some cell types that divide asymmetrically, mother and daughter centrosomes are noticeably different from one another in structure, behaviour, and fate, and that robust ACD depends upon centrosome function. Here, I review the latest advances in this field with special emphasis on the complex structure-function relationship of centrosomes with regards to ACD and on mechanistic insight derived from cell types that divide symmetrically but is likely to be relevant in ACD. I also include a comment arguing for the need to investigate the centrosome cycle in other cell types that divide asymmetrically.

Centrosome Protein 78 Is Overexpressed in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer and Is Associated with Tumor Molecular Subtypes and Mutation Signatures

BACKGROUND Centrosome aberrations have long been linked to tumorigenesis. Centrosome protein 78 (CEP78) is a centrosome component that is required to regulate the cell cycle, but its role in bladder cancer has not been elucidated. MATERIAL AND METHODS Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry were used to examine the expression of CEP78 in bladder cancer tissues and adjacent non-cancer tissues. RESULTS Analysis of the RNA-Seq data from the TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) MIBC cohort (n=408) revealed that CEP78 was overexpressed in tumor tissues, which was confirmed with fresh-frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens collected from 28 and 33 MIBC patients, respectively, in the present study. The clinicopathological relevance of CEP78 was further investigated. High CEP78 expression was found to be correlated with non-papillary histological type, luminal, basal-squamous and neuronal molecular subtypes, TP53 mutation, RB1 mutation, wild-type FGFR3, PPARG fusion and amplification, high total number of single-nucleotide variants, and high neoantigen load, but it was not associated with tumor stages or overall survival. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study suggest that CEP78 plays in a role in promoting the development of MIBC and could be a novel diagnostic and therapeutic target.

Centrosomal and Non-Centrosomal Microtubule-Organizing Centers (MTOCs) in Drosophila melanogaster

The centrosome is the best-understood microtubule-organizing center (MTOC) and is essential in particular cell types and at specific stages during Drosophila development. The centrosome is not required zygotically for mitosis or to achieve full animal development. Nevertheless, centrosomes are essential maternally during cleavage cycles in the early embryo, for male meiotic divisions, for efficient division of epithelial cells in the imaginal wing disc, and for cilium/flagellum assembly in sensory neurons and spermatozoa. Importantly, asymmetric and polarized division of stem cells is regulated by centrosomes and by the asymmetric regulation of their microtubule (MT) assembly activity. More recently, the components and functions of a variety of non-centrosomal microtubule-organizing centers (ncMTOCs) have begun to be elucidated. Throughout Drosophila development, a wide variety of unique ncMTOCs form in epithelial and non-epithelial cell types at an assortment of subcellular locations. Some of these cell types also utilize the centrosomal MTOC, while others rely exclusively on ncMTOCs. The impressive variety of ncMTOCs being discovered provides novel insight into the diverse functions of MTOCs in cells and tissues. This review highlights our current knowledge of the composition, assembly, and functional roles of centrosomal and non-centrosomal MTOCs in Drosophila.

Mutations in microRNA binding sites of CEP genes involved in cancer

The CEP genes play a pivotal role in the replication of the cell. CEP family proteins form the major constituents of the centrosome and play a prominent role in centriole biogenesis and in cell replication. Alteration in CEP genes will result in disruption of cell cycle that may in turn cause cancer. In our study, we found that 16 of the CEP genes are a potential target to miRNA that binds to complementary sequences in 3'untranslated regions (UTR) of mRNA and stop them from translation. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) occurring naturally in such miRNA binding site can alter the miRNA: mRNA interaction and can significantly alter gene expression. We developed a systematic computational pipeline that integrates data from well-established databases, followed stringent selection criteria and identified a panel of 44 high-confidence SNPs that may impair miRNA target sites in the 3'UTR of 16 genes. Further we performed expression analysis to shed light on the potential tissues that might be affected by mutation, enrichment analysis to find the metabolic functions of the gene, and network analysis to highlight the important interactions of CEP genes with other genes to provide insight that complex network will be disturbed upon mutation. In this study, we explored and prioritised the SNPs in CEP gene which could act as a potential target in centrosome-associated human disease. Our analysis would provide a thoughtful insight to wet lab researches to understand the expression pattern of CEP genes and binding phenomenon of mRNA and miRNA upon mutation, which is responsible for inhibition of translation process at genomic levels.

When fate follows age: unequal centrosomes in asymmetric cell division

A strong correlation between centrosome age and fate has been reported in some stem cells and progenitors that divide asymmetrically. In some cases, such stereotyped centrosome behaviour is essential to endow stemness to only one of the two daughters, whereas in other cases causality is still uncertain. Here, we present the different cell types in which correlated centrosome age and fate has been documented, review current knowledge on the underlying molecular mechanisms and discuss possible functional implications of this process.

Sorting DNA with asymmetry: a new player in gene regulation?

In recent years, our views on how DNA and genes are organised and regulated have evolved significantly. One example is provided by reports that single DNA strands in the double helix could carry distinct forms of information. That chromatids carrying old and nascently replicated DNA strands are recognised by the mitotic machinery, then segregated in a concerted way to distinct daughter cells after cell division is remarkable. Notably, this phenomenon in several cases has been associated with the cell fate choice of resulting daughter cells. Here, we review the evidence for asymmetric or template DNA strand segregation in mammals with a focus on skeletal muscle.

CEP proteins: the knights of centrosome dynasty

Centrosome forms the backbone of cell cycle progression mechanism. Recent debates have occurred regarding the essentiality of centrosome in cell cycle regulation. CEP family protein is the active component of centrosome and plays a vital role in centriole biogenesis and cell cycle progression control. A total of 31 proteins have been categorized into CEP family protein category and many more are under candidate evaluation. Furthermore, by the recent advancements in genomics and proteomics researches, several new CEP proteins have also been characterized. Here we have summarized the importance of CEP family proteins and their regulation mechanism involved in proper cell cycle progression. Further, we have reviewed the detailed molecular mechanism behind the associated pathological phenotypes and the possible therapeutic approaches. Proteins such as CEP57, CEP63, CEP152, CEP164, and CEP215 have been extensively studied with a detailed description of their molecular mechanisms, which are among the primary targets for drug discovery. Moreover, CEP27, CEP55, CEP70, CEP110, CEP120, CEP135, CEP192, CEP250, CEP290, and CEP350 also seem promising for future drug discovery approaches. Since the overview implicates that the overall researches on CEP proteins are not yet able to present significant details required for effective therapeutics development, thus, it is timely to discuss the importance of future investigations in this field.

Never tear us apart--the importance of centrosome clustering

The presence of more than two centrosomes (centrosome amplification) at the onset of mitosis has long been associated with multipolar spindle formation, and with the generation of genetic instability. However, in recent years, several studies have shown that a process termed 'centrosome clustering' actively contributes to bipolar division by promoting the gathering of extra centrosomes in two main poles. In this Commentary, we describe the main proteins that are involved in centriole duplication and discuss how centrosome amplification can be generated both in vitro and in vivo. We then summarize what is currently known about the processes that contribute to bipolar spindle formation when extra centrosomes are present, and which forces contribute to this process. Finally, we discuss how extra centrosomes might contribute to tumorigenesis, giving emphasis to the role of centrosome amplification in promoting genetic instability.

RNA in centrosomes: structure and possible functions

A novel RNA was detected in the centrosomes of Spisula solidissima mollusk oocytes in 2006. This RNA was named centrosomal RNA (cnRNA); five different cnRNAs were described. During the sequencing of the first transcript, cnRNA 11, it was discovered that the transcript contained a conserved structure--a reverse transcriptase domain. In a 2005 study, we speculated about several possible mechanisms for determining the most important functions of centrosomal structures and referred to one of them as an "RNA-dependent mechanism". The discovery of RNA specific to the centrosome is indirect evidence of the centrosomal hypothesis of cellular aging and differentiation. The presence of a reverse transcriptase domain in this type of RNA, together with its uniqueness and specificity, makes the centrosome a place of information storage and reproduction.

Centrosome loss or amplification does not dramatically perturb global gene expression in Drosophila

Centrosome defects are a common feature of many cancers, and they can predispose fly brain cells to form tumours. In flies, centrosome defects perturb the asymmetric division of the neural stem cells, but it is unclear how this might lead to malignant transformation. One possibility is that centrosome defects might also perturb cellular homeostasis: for example, stress pathways are often activated in response to centrosome defects in cultured cells, and stress contributes to tumourigenesis in some fly models. Here we attempt to assess whether centrosome loss or centrosome amplification perturbs cell physiology in vivo by profiling the global transcriptome of Drosophila larval brains and imaginal discs that either lack centrosomes or have too many centrosomes. Surprisingly, we find that centrosome loss or amplification leads to few changes in the transcriptional profile of these cells, indicating that centrosome defects are surprisingly well tolerated by these cells. These observations indicate that centrosome defects can predispose fly brain cells to form tumours without, at least initially, dramatically altering their physiology.

The centrosome in cells and organisms

The centrosome acts as the main microtubule-nucleating organelle in animal cells and plays a critical role in mitotic spindle orientation and in genome stability. Yet, despite its central role in cell biology, the centrosome is not present in all multicellular organisms or in all cells of a given organism. The main outcome of centrosome reproduction is the transmission of polarity to daughter cells and, in most animal species, the sperm-donated centrosome defines embryo polarity. Here I will discuss the role of the centrosome in cell polarity, resulting from its ability to position the nucleus at the cell center, and discuss how centrosome innovation might have been critical during metazoan evolution.

The significant role of centrosomes in stem cell division and differentiation

The role of centrosomes in stem cell division has recently been highlighted and further ascribes important functions to centrosomes in stem cell maintenance, cellular differentiation, and development. Advanced cell and molecular studies coupled with immunofluorescence, electron microscopy, and live cell imaging of specific centrosome proteins have contributed greatly to our knowledge of centrosome composition, structure, and dynamics and have uncovered new insights into mechanisms of centrosome functions in asymmetric cell division. The establishment of asymmetry and differential positioning of mother and daughter centrosomes during stem cell mitosis is important for allowing one cell to maintain stem cell characteristics while the sibling cell undergoes differentiation. Another key role for centrosomes has been revealed in primary cilia of embryonic stem cells that play significant roles in cellular signaling and are therefore critically important for stem cell decisions. Studies of signaling through primary cilia may contribute important information that may aid in the production of specific cells that are suitable for tissue repair and regeneration in the field of regenerative medicine.

Male gametogenesis without centrioles

The orientation of the mitotic spindle plays a central role in specifying stem cell-renewal by enabling interaction of the daughter cells with external cues: the daughter cell closest to the hub region is instructed to self-renew, whereas the distal one starts to differentiate. Here, we have analyzed male gametogenesis in DSas-4 Drosophila mutants and we have reported that spindle alignment and asymmetric divisions are properly executed in male germline stem cells that lack centrioles. Spermatogonial divisions also correctly proceed in the absence of centrioles, giving rise to cysts of 16 primary spermatocytes. By contrast, abnormal meiotic spindles assemble in primary spermatocytes. These results point to different requirements for centrioles during male gametogenesis of Drosophila. Spindle formation during germ cell mitosis may be successfully supported by an acentrosomal pathway that is inadequate to warrant the proper execution of meiosis.

Vertebrate maternal-effect genes: Insights into fertilization, early cleavage divisions, and germ cell determinant localization from studies in the zebrafish

In the earliest stages of animal development prior to the commencement of zygotic transcription, all critical cellular processes are carried out by maternally-provided molecular products accumulated in the egg during oogenesis. Disruption of these maternal products can lead to defective embryogenesis. In this review, we focus on maternal genes with roles in the fundamental processes of fertilization, cell division, centrosome regulation, and germ cell development with emphasis on findings from the zebrafish, as this is a unique and valuable model system for vertebrate reproduction.

Centrioles, centrosomes, and cilia in health and disease

Centrioles are barrel-shaped structures that are essential for the formation of centrosomes, cilia, and flagella. Here we review recent advances in our understanding of the function and biogenesis of these organelles, and we emphasize their connection to human disease. Deregulation of centrosome numbers has long been proposed to contribute to genome instability and tumor formation, whereas mutations in centrosomal proteins have recently been genetically linked to microcephaly and dwarfism. Finally, structural or functional centriole aberrations contribute to ciliopathies, a variety of complex diseases that stem from the absence or dysfunction of cilia.

Biased segregation of DNA and centrosomes: moving together or drifting apart?

Old and newly synthesized centrosomes have different microtubule nucleating abilities and they contribute to cell polarity when they migrate to opposite poles during cell division. The asymmetric localization of epigenetic marks and kinetochore proteins could lead to the differential recognition of sister chromatids and the biased segregation of DNA strands to daughter cells during cell division. We propose that this asymmetric localization is linked to biased chromatid segregation, which might also be related to the acquisition of distinct cell fates after mitosis.

Centrosome function in cancer: guilty or innocent?

The regulation of centrosome number and function underlies bipolar mitotic spindle formation and genetic integrity. Cancer cells both in culture and in situ exhibit a wide range of centrosome abnormalities. Here, we briefly review advances in our understanding of the pathways that govern normal centrosome function and outline the potential causes and consequences of their deregulation in disease. There is ample observational but little experimental evidence to support the conventional model that centrosome dysfunction causes genomic instability and, as a result, cancer. This model has been challenged by recent studies that have uncovered evidence of a direct link between centrosome function in asymmetric cell division and tumourigenesis. Thus, it is timely to discuss the provocative idea that, in certain tissues, abnormal centrosomes drive malignant transformation not by generating genomic instability but by deregulating asymmetric cell division.