Cost minimization analysis on IV to oral conversion of antimicrobial agent by the clinical pharmacist intervention

To reveal the unseen low-hanging fruit: A multi-method study of Indonesian hospital pharmacist perception regarding the implementation of injection-to-oral conversion activity

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies have demonstrated that the adoption of injection-to-oral conversion strategies in hospitalised patient yields both clinical and economic benefits. The objective of this study was to provide a comprehensive description of the current state of implementation and evaluate the perspectives of hospital pharmacists to guide future initiatives towards conversion implementation in Indonesia.

METHODS

A multi-method design was utilised. Quantitative approach used cross-sectional study design in which data were collected online using Google Form from August to October 2021. Qualitative analysis employed a phenomenological approach by performing in-depth interviews from July to August 2021. Each approach's data were compared to discover connections and discrepancies, and the final interpretation was done simultaneously.

RESULTS

A total of 204 pharmacists participated in the survey, with 64.2% of them reporting no previous experience in conversion. An in-depth interview included seven hospital pharmacists, with three themes were emerged: (1) strategic roles of the pharmacist; (2) key considerations; and (3) potential barriers and enablers of conversion implementation. Based on the elaboration of quantitative and qualitative data, the study found that pharmacist had strong perception regarding pharmacist role in conversion despite their little experience in implementing the activity. For future improvement, a platform that taking into account the pharmacist current conditions and insights should be created.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacists appreciated conversion activity and grasped its concepts despite little clinical experience. Consider possible enabling and barrier factors and essential considerations before taking action. Local guidelines and instructional materials that emphasise application or implementation are encouraged. Furthermore, the implementation project must be piloted and evaluated for clinical and economic outcomes.

Effect of tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide on the normal gut microbiota of a healthy adult population in Sweden: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobials cause perturbations in the composition and diversity of the host microbiome. We aimed to compare gut microbiome perturbations caused by oral tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide (a novel carbapenem) and by amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (an orally administered β-lactam-β-lactam inhibitor combination widely used in clinical practice).

METHODS

We did a phase 1, single-centre, randomised, parallel-group, active-control trial to evaluate the effect of tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide on the human gut microbiota. Healthy participants aged 18 years or older with no documented illnesses during recruitment were enrolled at Karolinska University Hospital (Stockholm, Sweden). Study participants were stratified by sex and block-randomised in a 1:1 ratio to treatment with either tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide (600 mg orally every 8 h) or amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (500 mg amoxicillin and 125 mg clavulanic acid orally every 8 h). The study included 10 days of treatment (days 1-10) and four follow-up visits (days 14, 21, 90, and 180). The trial was open-label for clinical investigators and patients, but masked for microbiology investigators. Faecal samples were collected at all visits. Sequencing of 16S rDNA was used to measure the diversity metrics, and quantitative culture to quantify selected taxa. The primary outcomes were changes in the α and β diversity and log count of colony-forming units for selected taxa between samples compared with baseline (day 1), and whether any changes reverted during the follow-up period. The analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04376554).

FINDINGS

The study was conducted between Jan 23, 2020, and April 6, 2021. 49 volunteers were screened for eligibility, among whom 30 evaluable participants (14 men and 16 women) were assigned: 15 (50%) to the tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide group and 15 (50%) to the amoxicillin-clavulanic acid group. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Complete follow-up was available for all participants, and all participants except one completed treatment as assigned. The diversity metrics showed significant changes from baseline during the treatment period. Significant decreases in richness were observed on days 4-10 (p≤0·0011) in the amoxicillin-clavulanic acid group and on days 4-14 (p≤0·0019) in the tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide group. Similarly, evenness was significantly decreased during treatment in the amoxicillin-clavulanic acid group (day 4, p=0·030) and the tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide group (days 4-10, p<0·0001) compared with baseline. Quantitative cultures showed significant decreases in Enterobacterales (days 4-7, p≤0·0030), Enterococcus spp (days 4-14, p=0·025 to p<0·0001), Bifidobacterium spp (days 2-4, p≤0·026), and Bacteroides spp (days 4-10, p≤0·030) in the tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide group. Similarly, in amoxicillin-clavulanic acid recipients, significant changes were observed in Enterobacterales (days 4-10, p≤0·048), Bifidobacterium spp (days 2-4, p≤0·013), and Lactobacillus spp (days 2-4, p≤0·020). Samples from the follow-up period were not significantly different from those at baseline in β diversity analysis (PERMANOVA, p>0·99). By the end of the study, no significant change was observed compared with baseline in either group. There were no deaths or severe adverse events.

INTERPRETATION

The impact of tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide on the gut microbiome was similar to that of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. The safety of antibiotic use with regard to the microbiome should be given attention, as dysbiosis is associated with health and disease.

FUNDING

Spero Therapeutics.

Antibiotic Stewardship: A Handshaking Strategy Among Physicians and Pharmacists to Improve therapeutic Outcomes in Hematology-Oncology

Background: Infections are highly susceptible in patients with hematological malignancies due to immune suppression, immunosuppressive therapies and disease progression. Rational use of antibiotics following Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) guidelines in early detection and response to infection is significant to improve patient care. Objectives: The present study was conducted to determine the impact of clinical pharmacists' interventions (PIs) on antibiotics usage in hematology-oncology set up in Karachi, Pakistan. Methodology: An observational prospective study was conducted for a period of 4 months in a well-known 75-bed teaching hospital, specializing in bone marrow transplantation in Karachi, Pakistan without a structured Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs). The information was gathered from patient medical histories, laboratory, and microbiological records. Results: A total of 876 PIs (1 to 5 per patient) were implemented. Dose modifications or interval changes accounted for the major interventions (n = 190, 21.6%). The majority of all recommendations were related to antipseudomonal β-lactams, aminoglycosides, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim and vancomycin. Overall, 94.3% (n = 876) of the 928 PIs were accepted. Conclusion: The PIs and the high physician acceptance rate may be useful for improving the safe use of antibiotics, lowering their toxicity, lowering the need for special-vigilance medications and potentially improving patient care.

Nanotechnology in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Antibiotic-Resistant Infections

The development of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), along with the relative reduction in the production of new antimicrobials, significantly limits the therapeutic options in infectious diseases. Thus, novel treatments, especially in the current era, where AMR is increasing, are urgently needed. There are several ongoing studies on non-classical therapies for infectious diseases, such as bacteriophages, antimicrobial peptides, and nanotechnology, among others. Nanomaterials involve materials on the nanoscale that could be used in the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of infectious diseases. This review provides an overview of the applications of nanotechnology in the diagnosis and treatment of infectious diseases from a clinician's perspective, with a focus on pathogens with AMR. Applications of nanomaterials in diagnosis, by taking advantage of their electrochemical, optic, magnetic, and fluorescent properties, are described. Moreover, the potential of metallic or organic nanoparticles (NPs) in the treatment of infections is also addressed. Finally, the potential use of NPs in the development of safe and efficient vaccines is also reviewed. Further studies are needed to prove the safety and efficacy of NPs that would facilitate their approval by regulatory authorities for clinical use.

The Impact of a Pharmacist-Led Intravenous to Oral Switch of Metronidazole: A Before-and-After Study

(1) Background. Intravenous (IV) to oral switch (IVOS) of antibiotics can reduce the length of hospitalisation, risk of IV catheter complications, and hospital costs. Pharmacists can play an instrumental role in implementing an IVOS initiative. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of pharmacist-led IVOS of metronidazole. (2) Method. This was an observational study conducted in a New Zealand hospital. During a 3-month intervention period, pharmacists identified patients receiving IV metronidazole; then initiated an IVOS for patients who met the criteria. The comparator groups were patients who were not switched by pharmacists in the post-intervention (post-IVOS) group, or patients treated with either IV or oral metronidazole prior to the intervention (pre-IVOS). Primary outcome measures were switch rate and duration of IV metronidazole treatment. Secondary outcome measures were readmission and/or repeat surgery within 90 days of discharge and the length of hospital stay. (3) Results. In total, 203 patients were included: 100 in the pre-IVOS and 103 in the post-IVOS groups. Pharmacists switched 63/93 (67.7%) of eligible patients to oral metronidazole in the post-IVOS period. Only 9/89 (10.1%) of IVOS eligible patients were switched in the pre-IVOS group. In the post-IVOS group, the mean duration of IV metronidazole treatment in patients switched by pharmacists was shorter than in those who were not switched by pharmacists (2.5 ± 2.8 days vs. 4.8 ± 5.9 days, p = 0.012). No significant difference was found in readmission or repeat surgery within 90 days of discharge for patients switched by pharmacists versus patients who were not switched by pharmacists. (4) Conclusion. Our data have demonstrated successful implementation of the hospital-approved pharmacist-led IVOS service.

Practical Concerns about the Metrics and Methods of Financial Outcome Measurement in Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs: A Narrative Review

Emerging pathogens in the meantime of paucity of new antibiotics discovery, put antimicrobial stewardship in the center of attention, to preserve the existing antimicrobial effect. Implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs, however, needs approval from healthcare system managers. The approval process can be enhanced, when the beneficial effects of stewardship programs are supported by both clinical and financial evidence. Focusing on the financial outcome evaluation, the practitioners who run the stewardship programs, may choose certain methods and metrics, depending on the clinical setting scale and type, available human resources, and budget. The wise selection of the methods and metrics warrants a comprehensive insight of the existing methods and metrics, deployed by typically published works that set good examples to follow. This review is an attempt to provide such an insight along with typical relevant examples for each metric and method.

An overview of the hospitals’ antimicrobial stewardship programs implemented to improve antibiotics’ utilization, cost and resistance patterns

Introduction: The high reliance of the physicians and surgeons on the antibiotics since their discovery has led to an irrational antibiotic utilization which not only has raised the incidence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) but also increased the cost of treatment with antibiotics as high use of antibiotics has been found related to the occurrence of certain nosocomial infections which need extra antibiotic courses to be cured. In order to overcome these antibiotic utilization related problems an antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) program being the set of various persuasive, restrictive and structural interventions is considered an effective tool to rationalize the in-patient antimicrobial utilization worldwide. Method: The focus of this review is on the interventions that are being implemented during the in-patient AMS programs and have been described effective in controlling the antibiotic utilization, their cost of treatment and an overall infection control. The literature containing the information about various AMS interventions effecting the utilization and cost patterns along with the impact on AMR was searched in various databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, Science Direct, Ovid (Medline) and Scopus. The categorical sorting of the published data is based on various AMS interventions such as the guideline development, formulary restriction (pre-authorization), educative interventions, clinical pathway development and prospective (post prescription) audit. Considering the objectives of the study such as the goal to curb overutilization of antibiotics, control of their cost of treatment for in-patients and infection control the sorted literature is presented in three different tables describing the AMS impact on the said outcomes. Results: The post AMS changes in utilization patterns are described as fall of antibiotics defined daily doses (DDD) and days of therapy (DOT) which resulted in the reduction of the cost of treatment with antibiotics. The reduction of the cost of treatment with antibiotics also resulted due to the AMS impact on the control of various nosocomial and multi-drug resistant (MDR) infections. Conclusion:  It has been concluded that the AMS program if implemented under the supervision of an expert AMS team mainly comprising of an infectious disease (ID) physician, clinical pharmacists and microbiologists with considerable support by the hospital authorities could be a highly efficient tool of the pharmacovigilance for rationalizing the in-patient antimicrobial practice.

A Narrative Review of Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions within In-patient Settings and Resultant Patient Outcomes

The overuse of antibiotics has led to various healthcare problems such as the emergence of resistance in infectious microbes and mortality due to antibiotic resistant healthcare associated infections (HAIs). An antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) program is the set of interventions used worldwide to enhance the rational use of antibiotics especially for the hospitalized patients. This review aimed to describe the characteristics of the implemented AMS programs in various hospitals of the world mainly focusing on the interventions and patients outcomes. The literature about AMS program was searched through various databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, Science Direct, Cochran Library, Ovid (Medline), Web of Science and Scopus. In this review the literature pertaining to the AMS programs for hospitalized patients is sorted on the basis of various interventions that are categorized as formulary restriction (pre-authorization), guideline development, clinical pathway development, educative interventions and prospective audit. Moreover a clear emphasis is laid on the patient outcomes obtained as a result of these interventions namely the infection control, drop in readmission rate, mortality control, resistance control and the control of an overall cost of antibiotic treatment obtained mainly by curbing the overuse of antibiotics within the hospital wards. AMS program is an efficient strategy of pharmacovigilance to rationalize the antimicrobial practice for hospitalized patients as it prevents the misuse of antibiotics, which ultimately retards the health threatening effects of various antibiotics.

Quality improvement of intravenous to oral medication conversion using Lean Six Sigma methodologies

Introduction

Lack of medication conversion from intravenous to oral contributes to increased risk of infection, delayed discharges and higher medication costs. At our institution, intravenous to oral medication conversion rate was 76% with missed opportunity for conversion of 37%. The goal of the project was to reduce the percent of missed opportunities for intravenous to oral conversion for applicable medications.

Methods

A pharmacy-driven intravenous to oral policy and procedure was implemented. To identify potential opportunities, a patient worklist of applicable intravenous to oral medications was created for pharmacy review in real time. An intravenous to oral conversion order was implemented in the computerised provider order entry. ‘Convert to oral’ was added as an option in the electronic medication request and highlighted reminders were added to the electronic medication administration record for eligible medications.

Results

After improvements, the missed opportunity rate for intravenous to oral conversion decreased from 37% (19/51) to 21% (24/113) (p=0.04, two-proportion test), a 43% improvement. The trend in intravenous to oral conversion rate increased from 76% (39/51) to 85% (171/201) and severity adjusted length of stay was reduced from 8.1 days to 6.4 days post improvements (p<0.001, t-test).