Principles Governing A-to-I RNA Editing in the Breast Cancer Transcriptome

Loss of ADAR1 induces ferroptosis of breast cancer cells

Adenosine deaminases acting on RNA 1(ADAR1), an RNA editing enzyme that converts adenosine to inosine by deamination in double-stranded RNAs, plays an important role in occurrence and progression of various types of cancer. Ferroptosis has emerged as a hot topic of cancer research in recent years. We have previously reported that ADAR1 promotes breast cancer progression by regulating miR-335-5p and METTL3. However, whether ADAR1 has effects on ferroptosis in breast cancer cells is largely unknown. In this study, we knocked down ADAR1 using CRISPR-Cas9 technology or over-expressed ADAR1 protein using plasmid expressing ADAR1 in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell lines, then detected cell viability, and levels of ROS, MDA, GSH, Fe2+, GPX4 protein and miR-335-5p. We showed that the cell proliferation was inhibited, levels of ROS, MDA, Fe2+, and miR-335-5p were increased, while GSH and GPX4 levels were decreased after loss of ADAR1, compared to the control group. The opposite effects were observed after ADAR1 overexpression in the cells. Further, we demonstrated that ADAR1-controlled miR-335-5p targeted Sp1 transcription factor of GPX4, a known ferroptosis molecular marker, leading to inhibition of ferroptosis by ADAR1 in breast cancer cells. Moreover, RNA editing activity of ADAR1 is not essential for inducing ferroptosis. Collectively, loss of ADAR1 induces ferroptosis in breast cancer cells by regulating miR-335-5p/Sp1/GPX4 pathway. The findings may provide insights into the mechanism by which ADAR1 promotes breast cancer progression via inhibiting ferroptosis.

Hepatocyte-macrophage crosstalk via the PGRN-EGFR axis modulates ADAR1-mediated immunity in the liver

ADAR1-mediated RNA editing establishes immune tolerance to endogenous double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) by preventing its sensing, primarily by MDA5. Although deleting Ifih1 (encoding MDA5) rescues embryonic lethality in ADAR1-deficient mice, they still experience early postnatal death, and removing other MDA5 signaling proteins does not yield the same rescue. Here, we show that ablation of MDA5 in a liver-specific Adar knockout (KO) murine model fails to rescue hepatic abnormalities caused by ADAR1 loss. Ifih1;Adar double KO (dKO) hepatocytes accumulate endogenous dsRNAs, leading to aberrant transition to a highly inflammatory state and recruitment of macrophages into dKO livers. Mechanistically, progranulin (PGRN) appears to mediate ADAR1 deficiency-induced liver pathology, promoting interferon signaling and attracting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)+ macrophages into dKO liver, exacerbating hepatic inflammation. Notably, the PGRN-EGFR crosstalk communication and consequent immune responses are significantly repressed in ADAR1high tumors, revealing that pre-neoplastic or neoplastic cells can exploit ADAR1-dependent immune tolerance to facilitate immune evasion.

CanCellVar: A database for single-cell variants map in human cancer

Numerous variants, including both single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) in DNA and A>G RNA edits in mRNA as essential drivers of cellular proliferation and tumorigenesis, are commonly associated with cancer progression and growth. Thus, mining and summarizing single-cell variants will provide a refined and higher-resolution view of cancer and further contribute to precision medicine. Here, we established a database, CanCellVar, which aims to provide and visualize the comprehensive atlas of single-cell variants in tumor microenvironment. The current CanCellVar identified ∼3 million variants (∼1.4 million SNVs and ∼1.4 million A>G RNA edits) involved in 2,754,531 cells of 5 major cell types across 37 cancer types. CanCellVar provides the basic annotation information as well as cellular and molecular function properties of variants. In addition, the clinical relevance of variants can be obtained including tumor grade, treatment, metastasis, and others. Several flexible tools were also developed to aid retrieval and to analyze cell-cell interactions, gene expression, cell-development trajectories, regulation, and molecular structure affected by variants. Collectively, CanCellVar will serve as a valuable resource for investigating the functions and characteristics of single-cell variations and their roles in human tumor evolution and treatment.

A-to-I RNA co-editing predicts clinical outcomes and is associated with immune cells infiltration in hepatocellular carcinoma

Aberrant RNA editing has emerged as a pivotal factor in the pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the impact of RNA co-editing within HCC remains underexplored. We used a multi-step algorithm to construct an RNA co-editing network in HCC, and found that HCC-related RNA editings are predominantly centralized within the network. Furthermore, five pairs of risk RNA co-editing events were significantly correlated with the overall survival in HCC. Based on presence of risk RNA co-editings resulted in the categorization of HCC patients into high-risk and low-risk groups. Disparities in immune cell infiltrations were observed between the two groups, with the high-risk group exhibiting a greater abundance of exhausted T cells. Additionally, seven genes associated with risk RNA co-editing pairs were identified, whose expression effectively differentiates HCC tumor samples from normal ones. Our research offers an innovative perspective on the etiology and potential therapeutics for HCC.

ADAR-Mediated A>I(G) RNA Editing in the Genotoxic Drug Response of Breast Cancer

Epitranscriptomics is a field that delves into post-transcriptional changes. Among these modifications, the conversion of adenosine to inosine, traduced as guanosine (A>I(G)), is one of the known RNA-editing mechanisms, catalyzed by ADARs. This type of RNA editing is the most common type of editing in mammals and contributes to biological diversity. Disruption in the A>I(G) RNA-editing balance has been linked to diseases, including several types of cancer. Drug resistance in patients with cancer represents a significant public health concern, contributing to increased mortality rates resulting from therapy non-responsiveness and disease progression, representing the greatest challenge for researchers in this field. The A>I(G) RNA editing is involved in several mechanisms over the immunotherapy and genotoxic drug response and drug resistance. This review investigates the relationship between ADAR1 and specific A>I(G) RNA-edited sites, focusing particularly on breast cancer, and the impact of these sites on DNA damage repair and the immune response over anti-cancer therapy. We address the underlying mechanisms, bioinformatics, and in vitro strategies for the identification and validation of A>I(G) RNA-edited sites. We gathered databases related to A>I(G) RNA editing and cancer and discussed the potential clinical and research implications of understanding A>I(G) RNA-editing patterns. Understanding the intricate role of ADAR1-mediated A>I(G) RNA editing in breast cancer holds significant promise for the development of personalized treatment approaches tailored to individual patients' A>I(G) RNA-editing profiles.

A-to-I Editing Is Subtype-Specific in Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas

Cancer is a complex and heterogeneous disease, in which a number of genetic and epigenetic changes occur in tumor onset and progression. Recent studies indicate that changes at the RNA level are also involved in tumorigenesis, such as adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing. Here, we systematically investigate transcriptome-wide A-to-I editing events in a large number of samples from Non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs). Using a computational pipeline that determines significant differences in editing level between NHL and normal samples at known A-to-I editing sites, we identify a number of differentially edited editing sites between NHL subtypes and normal samples. Most of the differentially edited sites are located in non-coding regions, and many such sites show a strong correlation between gene expression level and editing efficiency, indicating that RNA editing might have direct consequences for the cancer cell's aberrant gene regulation status in these cases. Moreover, we establish a strong link between RNA editing and NHL by demonstrating that NHL and normal samples and even NHL subtypes can be distinguished based on genome-wide RNA editing profiles alone. Our study establishes a strong link between RNA editing, cancer and aberrant gene regulation in NHL.

Navigating the landscape of epitranscriptomics and host immunity

RNA modifications, also termed epitranscriptomic marks, encompass chemical alterations to individual nucleotides, including processes such as methylation and editing. These marks contribute to a wide range of biological processes, many of which are related to host immune system defense. The functions of immune-related RNA modifications can be categorized into three main groups: regulation of immunogenic RNAs, control of genes involved in innate immune response, and facilitation of adaptive immunity. Here, we provide an overview of recent research findings that elucidate the contributions of RNA modifications to each of these processes. We also discuss relevant methods for genome-wide identification of RNA modifications and their immunogenic substrates. Finally, we highlight recent advances in cancer immunotherapies that aim to reduce cancer cell viability by targeting the enzymes responsible for RNA modifications. Our presentation of these dynamic research avenues sets the stage for future investigations in this field.

Induction of Viral Mimicry Upon Loss of DHX9 and ADAR1 in Breast Cancer Cells

Detection of viral double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) is an important component of innate immunity. However, many endogenous RNAs containing double-stranded regions can be misrecognized and activate innate immunity. The IFN-inducible ADAR1-p150 suppresses dsRNA sensing, an essential function for adenosine deaminase acting on RNA 1 (ADAR1) in many cancers, including breast. Although ADAR1-p150 has been well established in this role, the functions of the constitutively expressed ADAR1-p110 isoform are less understood. We used proximity labeling to identify putative ADAR1-p110-interacting proteins in breast cancer cell lines. Of the proteins identified, the RNA helicase DHX9 was of particular interest. Knockdown of DHX9 in ADAR1-dependent cell lines caused cell death and activation of the dsRNA sensor PKR. In ADAR1-independent cell lines, combined knockdown of DHX9 and ADAR1, but neither alone, caused activation of multiple dsRNA sensing pathways leading to a viral mimicry phenotype. Together, these results reveal an important role for DHX9 in suppressing dsRNA sensing by multiple pathways.

SIGNIFICANCE

These findings implicate DHX9 as a suppressor of dsRNA sensing. In some cell lines, loss of DHX9 alone is sufficient to cause activation of dsRNA sensing pathways, while in other cell lines DHX9 functions redundantly with ADAR1 to suppress pathway activation.

Epitranscriptomic orchestrations: Unveiling the regulatory paradigm of m6A, A-to-I editing, and m5C in breast cancer via long noncoding RNAs and microRNAs

Breast cancer (BC) poses a persistent global health challenge, particularly in countries with elevated human development indices linked to factors such as increased life expectancy, education, and wealth. Despite therapeutic progress, challenges persist, and the role of epitranscriptomic RNA modifications in BC remains inadequately understood. The epitranscriptome, comprising diverse posttranscriptional modifications on RNA molecules, holds the potential to intricately modulate RNA function and regulation, implicating dysregulation in various diseases, including BC. Noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs), acting as posttranscriptional regulators, influence physiological and pathological processes, including cancer. RNA modifications in long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) and microRNAs (miRNAs) add an extra layer to gene expression control. This review delves into recent insights into epitranscriptomic RNA modifications, such as N-6-methyladenosine (m6A), adenine-to-inosine (A-to-I) editing, and 5-methylcytosine (m5C), specifically in the context of lncRNA and miRNAs in BC, highlighting their potential implications in BC development and progression. Understanding this intricate regulatory landscape is vital for deciphering the molecular mechanisms underlying BC and identifying potential therapeutic targets.

Adenosine Deaminase Family Acting on RNA 1 (ADAR1) May Be a De Novo Target for Endometriosis Treatment

BACKGROUND/AIM

Adenosine deaminase family acting on RNA 1 (ADAR1) expression was examined to determine its correlation with endometriosis. The biological functions and inhibitory effects of ADAR1 knockdown were investigated in a human endometriotic cell line.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

ADAR1 was examined in patients with and without endometriosis using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and the apoptotic expression of ADAR1 small interfering RNA (siRNA) was confirmed using flow cytometry. The biological functions and inhibitory effects of ADAR1 knockdown were investigated using RT-PCR in a 12Z immortalized human endometriotic cell line.

RESULTS

ADAR1 expression was significantly higher in patients with endometriosis than in those without (p<0.001). ADAR1 siRNA increased early and late apoptosis, compared to the mock (24.83%) and control (19.96%) cells. ADAR1 knockdown led to apoptosis through MDA5, RIG-I, IRF3, IRF7, caspase 3, caspase 7, and caspase 8 expression in the cell lines.

CONCLUSION

ADAR1 is a potential novel therapeutic target in endometriosis.

In search of critical dsRNA targets of ADAR1

Recent studies have underscored the pivotal role of adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing, catalyzed by ADAR1, in suppressing innate immune interferon responses triggered by cellular double-stranded RNA (dsRNA). However, the specific ADAR1 editing targets crucial for this regulatory function remain elusive. We review analyses of transcriptome-wide ADAR1 editing patterns and their evolutionary dynamics, which offer valuable insights into this unresolved query. The growing appreciation of the significance of immunogenic dsRNAs and their editing in inflammatory and autoimmune diseases and cancer calls for a more comprehensive understanding of dsRNA immunogenicity, which may promote our understanding of these diseases and open doors to therapeutic avenues.

Vaccinia-related kinase 2 variants differentially affect breast cancer growth by regulating kinase activity

Genetic information is transcribed from genomic DNA to mRNA, which is then translated into three-dimensional proteins. mRNAs can undergo various post-transcriptional modifications, including RNA editing that alters mRNA sequences, ultimately affecting protein function. In this study, RNA editing was identified at the 499th base (c.499) of human vaccinia-related kinase 2 (VRK2). This RNA editing changes the amino acid in the catalytic domain of VRK2 from isoleucine (with adenine base) to valine (with guanine base). Isoleucine-containing VRK2 has higher kinase activity than the valine-containing VRK2, which leads to an increase in tumor cell proliferation. Earlier we reported that VRK2 directly interacts with dystrobrevin-binding protein (dysbindin) and results in reducing its stability. Herein, we demonstrate that isoleucine-containing VRK2 decreases the level of dysbindin than valine-containing VRK2. Dysbindin interacts with cyclin D and thereby regulates its expression and function. The reduction in the level of dysbindin by isoleucine-containing VRK2 further enhances the cyclin D expression, resulting in increased tumor growth and reduction in survival rates. It has also been observed that in patient samples, VRK2 level was elevated in breast cancer tissue compared to normal breast tissue. Additionally, the isoleucine form of VRK2 exhibited a greater increase in breast cancer tissue. Therefore, it is concluded that VRK2, especially dependent on the 167th variant amino acid, can be one of the indexes of tumor progression and proliferation.

RNA Editing in Cancer Progression

Coding and noncoding RNA molecules play their roles in ensuring cell function and tissue homeostasis in an ordered and systematic fashion. RNA chemical modifications can occur both at bases and ribose sugar, and, similarly to DNA and histone modifications, can be written, erased, and recognized by the corresponding enzymes, thus modulating RNA activities and fine-tuning gene expression programs. RNA editing is one of the most prevalent and abundant forms of post-transcriptional RNA modification in normal physiological processes. By altering the sequences of mRNAs, it makes them different from the corresponding genomic template. Hence, edited mRNAs can produce protein isoforms that are functionally different from the corresponding genome-encoded variants. Abnormalities in regulatory enzymes and changes in RNA-modification patterns are closely associated with the occurrence and development of various human diseases, including cancer. To date, the roles played by RNA modifications in cancer are gathering increasing interest. In this review, we focus on the role of RNA editing in cancer transformation and provide a new perspective on its impact on tumorigenesis, by regulating cell proliferation, differentiation, invasion, migration, stemness, metabolism, and drug resistance.

Loss of ADAR1 in macrophages in combination with interferon gamma suppresses tumor growth by remodeling the tumor microenvironment

BACKGROUND

ADAR1, the major enzyme for RNA editing, has emerged as a tumor-intrinsic key determinant for cancer immunotherapy efficacy through modulating interferon-mediated innate immunity. However, the role of ADAR1 in innate immune cells such as macrophages remains unknown.

METHODS

We first analyzed publicly accessible patient-derived single-cell RNA-sequencing and perturbed RNA sequencing data to elucidate the ADAR1 expression and function in macrophages. Subsequently, we evaluated the combined effects of ADAR1 conditional knockout in macrophages and interferon (IFN)-γ treatment on tumor growth in three distinct disease mouse models: LLC for lung cancer, B16-F10 for melanoma, and MC38 for colon cancer. To gain the mechanistic insights, we performed human cytokine arrays to identify differentially secreted cytokines in response to ADAR1 perturbations in THP-1 cells. Furthermore, we examined the effects of ADAR1 loss and IFN-γ treatment on vessel formation through immunohistochemical staining of mouse tumor sections and tube-forming experiments using HUVEC and SVEC4-10 cells. We also assessed the effects on CD8+ T cells using immunofluorescent and immunohistochemical staining and flow cytometry. To explore the translational potential, we examined the consequences of injecting ADAR1-deficient macrophages alongside IFN-γ treatment on tumor growth in LLC-tumor-bearing mice.

RESULTS

Our analysis on public data suggests that ADAR1 loss in macrophages promotes antitumor immunity as in cancer cells. Indeed, ADAR1 loss in macrophages combined with IFN-γ treatment results in tumor regression in diverse disease mouse models. Mechanistically, the loss of ADAR1 in macrophages leads to the differential secretion of key cytokines: it inhibits the translation of CCL20, GDF15, IL-18BP, and TIM-3 by activating PKR/EIF2α signaling but increases the secretion of IFN-γ through transcriptional upregulation and interleukin (IL)-18 due to the 5'UTR uORF. Consequently, decreased CCL20 and GDF15 and increased IFN-γ suppress angiogenesis, while decreased IL-18BP and TIM-3 and increased IL-18 induce antitumor immunity by enhancing cytotoxicity of CD8+ T cells. We further demonstrate that combination therapy of injecting ADAR1-deficient macrophages and IFN-γ effectively suppresses tumors in vivo.

CONCLUSION

This study provides a comprehensive elucidation of how ADAR1 loss within macrophages contributes to the establishment of an antitumor microenvironment, suggesting the therapeutic potential of targeting ADAR1 beyond the scope of cancer cells.

Induction of viral mimicry upon loss of DHX9 and ADAR1 in breast cancer cells

Detection of viral double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) is an important component of innate immunity. However, many endogenous RNAs containing double-stranded regions can be misrecognized and activate innate immunity. The interferon inducible ADAR1-p150 suppresses dsRNA sensing, an essential function for ADAR1 in many cancers, including breast. Although ADAR1-p150 has been well established in this role, the functions of the constitutively expressed ADAR1-p110 isoform are less understood. We used proximity labeling to identify putative ADAR1-p110 interacting proteins in breast cancer cell lines. Of the proteins identified, the RNA helicase DHX9 was of particular interest. Knockdown of DHX9 in ADAR1-dependent cell lines caused cell death and activation of the dsRNA sensor PKR. In ADAR1-independent cell lines, combined knockdown of DHX9 and ADAR1, but neither alone, caused activation of multiple dsRNA sensing pathways leading to a viral mimicry phenotype. Together, these results reveal an important role for DHX9 in suppressing dsRNA sensing by multiple pathways.

A-to-I RNA editing by ADAR and its therapeutic applications: From viral infections to cancer immunotherapy

ADAR deaminases catalyze adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) editing on double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) substrates that regulate an umbrella of biological processes. One of the two catalytically active ADAR enzymes, ADAR1, plays a major role in innate immune responses by suppression of RNA sensing pathways which are orchestrated through the ADAR1-dsRNA-MDA5 axis. Unedited immunogenic dsRNA substrates are potent ligands for the cellular sensor MDA5. Upon activation, MDA5 leads to the induction of interferons and expression of hundreds of interferon-stimulated genes with potent antiviral activity. In this way, ADAR1 acts as a gatekeeper of the RNA sensing pathway by striking a fine balance between innate antiviral responses and prevention of autoimmunity. Reduced editing of immunogenic dsRNA by ADAR1 is strongly linked to the development of common autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. In viral infections, ADAR1 exhibits both antiviral and proviral effects. This is modulated by both editing-dependent and editing-independent functions, such as PKR antagonism. Several A-to-I RNA editing events have been identified in viruses, including in the insidious viral pathogen, SARS-CoV-2 which regulates viral fitness and infectivity, and could play a role in shaping viral evolution. Furthermore, ADAR1 is an attractive target for immuno-oncology therapy. Overexpression of ADAR1 and increased dsRNA editing have been observed in several human cancers. Silencing ADAR1, especially in cancers that are refractory to immune checkpoint inhibitors, is a promising therapeutic strategy for cancer immunotherapy in conjunction with epigenetic therapy. The mechanistic understanding of dsRNA editing by ADAR1 and dsRNA sensing by MDA5 and PKR holds great potential for therapeutic applications. This article is categorized under: RNA Processing > RNA Editing and Modification RNA in Disease and Development > RNA in Disease.

Lessons from discovery of true ADAR RNA editing sites in a human cell line

BACKGROUND

Conversion or editing of adenosine (A) into inosine (I) catalyzed by specialized cellular enzymes represents one of the most common post-transcriptional RNA modifications with emerging connection to disease. A-to-I conversions can happen at specific sites and lead to increase in proteome diversity and changes in RNA stability, splicing, and regulation. Such sites can be detected as adenine-to-guanine sequence changes by next-generation RNA sequencing which resulted in millions reported sites from multiple genome-wide surveys. Nonetheless, the lack of extensive independent validation in such endeavors, which is critical considering the relatively high error rate of next-generation sequencing, leads to lingering questions about the validity of the current compendiums of the editing sites and conclusions based on them.

RESULTS

Strikingly, we found that the current analytical methods suffer from very high false positive rates and that a significant fraction of sites in the public databases cannot be validated. In this work, we present potential solutions to these problems and provide a comprehensive and extensively validated list of A-to-I editing sites in a human cancer cell line. Our findings demonstrate that most of true A-to-I editing sites in a human cancer cell line are located in the non-coding transcripts, the so-called RNA 'dark matter'. On the other hand, many ADAR editing events occurring in exons of human protein-coding mRNAs, including those that can recode the transcriptome, represent false positives and need to be interpreted with caution. Nonetheless, yet undiscovered authentic ADAR sites that increase the diversity of human proteome exist and warrant further identification.

CONCLUSIONS

Accurate identification of human ADAR sites remains a challenging problem, particularly for the sites in exons of protein-coding mRNAs. As a result, genome-wide surveys of ADAR editome must still be accompanied by extensive Sanger validation efforts. However, given the vast number of unknown human ADAR sites, there is a need for further developments of the analytical techniques, potentially those that are based on deep learning solutions, in order to provide a quick and reliable identification of the editome in any sample.

A novel, effective machine learning-based RNA editing profile for predicting the prognosis of lower-grade gliomas

Patients with low-grade glioma (LGG) may survive for long time periods, but their tumors often progress to higher-grade lesions. Currently, no cure for LGG is available. A-to-I RNA editing accounts for nearly 90% of all RNA editing events in humans and plays a role in tumorigenesis in various cancers. However, little is known regarding its prognostic role in LGG. On the basis of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data, we used LASSO and univariate Cox regression to construct an RNA editing site signature. The results derived from the TCGA dataset were further validated with Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA) datasets. Five machine learning algorithms (Decision Trees C5.0, XGboost, GBDT, Lightgbm, and Catboost) were used to confirm the prognosis associated with the RNA editing site signature. Finally, we explored immune function, immunotherapy, and potential therapeutic agents in the high- and low-risk groups by using multiple biological prediction websites. A total of 22,739 RNA editing sites were identified, and a signature model consisting of four RNA editing sites (PRKCSH|chr19:11561032, DSEL|chr18:65174489, UGGT1|chr2:128952084, and SOD2|chr6:160101723) was established. Cox regression analysis indicated that the RNA editing signature was an independent prognostic factor, according to the ROC curve (AUC = 0.823), and the nomogram model had good predictive power (C-index = 0.824). In addition, the predictive ability of the RNA editing signature was confirmed with the machine learning model. The sensitivity of PCI-34051 and Elephantin was significantly higher in the high-risk group than the low-risk group, thus potentially providing a marker to predict the effects of lung cancer drug treatment. RNA editing may serve as a novel survival prediction tool, thus offering hope for developing editing-based therapeutic strategies to combat LGG progression. In addition, this tool may help optimize survival risk assessment and individualized care for patients with low-grade gliomas.

RNA editing of AZIN1 coding sites is catalyzed by ADAR1 p150 after splicing

Adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing is catalyzed by nuclear adenosine deaminase acting on RNA 1 (ADAR1) p110 and ADAR2, and cytoplasmic ADAR1 p150 in mammals, all of which recognize dsRNAs as targets. RNA editing occurs in some coding regions, which alters protein functions by exchanging amino acid sequences, and is therefore physiologically significant. In general, such coding sites are edited by ADAR1 p110 and ADAR2 before splicing, given that the corresponding exon forms a dsRNA structure with an adjacent intron. We previously found that RNA editing at two coding sites of antizyme inhibitor 1 (AZIN1) is sustained in Adar1 p110/Aadr2 double KO mice. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying RNA editing of AZIN1 remain unknown. Here, we showed that Azin1 editing levels were increased upon type I interferon treatment, which activated Adar1 p150 transcription, in mouse Raw 264.7 cells. Azin1 RNA editing was observed in mature mRNA but not precursor mRNA. Furthermore, we revealed that the two coding sites were editable only by ADAR1 p150 in both mouse Raw 264.7 and human embryonic kidney 293T cells. This unique editing was achieved by forming a dsRNA structure with a downstream exon after splicing, and the intervening intron suppressed RNA editing. Therefore, deletion of a nuclear export signal from ADAR1 p150, shifting its localization to the nucleus, decreased Azin1 editing levels. Finally, we demonstrated that Azin1 RNA editing was completely absent in Adar1 p150 KO mice. Thus, these findings indicate that RNA editing of AZIN1 coding sites is exceptionally catalyzed by ADAR1 p150 after splicing.

Over-expression of ADAR1 in mice does not initiate or accelerate cancer formation in vivo

Adenosine to inosine editing (A-to-I) in regions of double stranded RNA (dsRNA) is mediated by adenosine deaminase acting on RNA 1 (ADAR1) or ADAR2. ADAR1 and A-to-I editing levels are increased in many human cancers. Inhibition of ADAR1 has emerged as a high priority oncology target, however, whether ADAR1 overexpression enables cancer initiation or progression has not been directly tested. We established a series of in vivo models to allow overexpression of full-length ADAR1, or its individual isoforms, to test if increased ADAR1 expression was oncogenic. Widespread over-expression of ADAR1 or the p110 or p150 isoforms individually as sole lesions was well tolerated and did not result in cancer initiation. Therefore, ADAR1 overexpression alone is not sufficient to initiate cancer. We demonstrate that endogenous ADAR1 and A-to-I editing increased upon immortalization in murine cells, consistent with the observations from human cancers. We tested if ADAR1 over-expression could co-operate with cancer initiated by loss of tumour suppressors using a model of osteosarcoma. We did not see a disease potentiating or modifying effect of overexpressing ADAR1 or its isoforms in the models assessed. We conclude that increased ADAR1 expression and A-to-I editing in cancers is most likely a consequence of tumor formation.

Identification of novel interacts partners of ADAR1 enzyme mediating the oncogenic process in aggressive breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype is characterized by aggressive clinical behavior and poor prognosis patient outcomes. Here, we show that ADAR1 is more abundantly expressed in infiltrating breast cancer (BC) tumors than in benign tumors. Further, ADAR1 protein expression is higher in aggressive BC cells (MDA-MB-231). Moreover, we identify a novel interacting partners proteins list with ADAR1 in MDA-MB-231, using immunoprecipitation assay and mass spectrometry. Using iLoop, a protein-protein interaction prediction server based on structural features, five proteins with high iloop scores were discovered: Histone H2A.V, Kynureninase (KYNU), 40S ribosomal protein SA, Complement C4-A, and Nebulin (ranged between 0.6 and 0.8). In silico analysis showed that invasive ductal carcinomas had the highest level of KYNU gene expression than the other classifications (p < 0.0001). Moreover, KYNU mRNA expression was shown to be considerably higher in TNBC patients (p < 0.0001) and associated with poor patient outcomes with a high-risk value. Importantly, we found an interaction between ADAR1 and KYNU in the more aggressive BC cells. Altogether, these results propose a new ADAR-KYNU interaction as potential therapeutic targeted therapy in aggressive BC.

COPA A-to-I RNA editing hijacks endoplasmic reticulum stress to promote metastasis in colorectal cancer

RNA editing is among the most common RNA level modifications for generating amino acid changes. We identified a COPA A-to-I RNA editing event in CRC metastasis. Our results showed that the COPA A-to-I RNA editing rate was significantly increased in metastatic CRC tissues and was closely associated with aggressive tumors in the T and N stages. The COPA I164V protein damaged the Golgi-ER reverse transport function, induced ER stress, promoted the translocation of the transcription factors ATF6, XBP1 and ATF4 into the nucleus, and activated the expression of MALAT1, MET, ZEB1, and lead to CRC cell invasion and metastasis. Moreover, the COPA A-to-I RNA editing rate was positively correlated with the immune infiltration score. Collectively, the COPA I164V protein hijacked ER stress to promote the metastasis of CRC, and the COPA A-to-I RNA editing rate may be a potential predictor for patient response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICIs) treatment.

Altered RNA Editing in Atopic Dermatitis Highlights the Role of Double-Stranded RNA for Immune Surveillance

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is associated with dysregulated type 1 IFN‒mediated responses, in parallel with the dominant type 2 inflammation. However, the pathophysiology of this dysregulation is largely unknown. Adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing plays a critical role in immune regulation by preventing double-stranded RNA recognition by MDA5 and IFN activation. We studied global adenosine-to-inosine editing in AD to elucidate the role played by altered editing in the pathophysiology of this disease. Analysis of three RNA-sequencing datasets of AD skin samples revealed reduced levels of adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing in AD. This reduction was seen globally throughout Alu repeats as well as in coding genes and in specific pre-mRNA loci expected to create long double-stranded RNA, the main substrate of MDA5 leading to type I IFN activation. Consistently, IFN signature genes were upregulated. In contrast, global editing was not altered in systemic lupus erythematosus and systemic sclerosis, despite IFN activation. Our results indicate that altered editing leading to impairment of the innate immune response may be involved in the pathogenesis of AD. Possibly, it may be relevant for additional autoimmune and inflammatory diseases.

The A-to-I editing of KPC1 promotes intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma by attenuating proteasomal processing of NF-κB1 p105 to p50

BACKGROUND

Aberrant RNA editing of adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) has been linked to multiple human cancers, but its role in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) remains unknown. We conducted an exome-wide investigation to search for dysregulated RNA editing that drive iCCA pathogenesis.

METHODS

An integrative whole-exome and transcriptome sequencing analysis was performed to elucidate the RNA editing landscape in iCCAs. Putative RNA editing sites were validated by Sanger sequencing. In vitro and in vivo experiments were used to assess the effects of an exemplary target gene Kip1 ubiquitination-promoting complex 1 (KPC1) and its editing on iCCA cells growth and metastasis. Crosstalk between KPC1 RNA editing and NF-κB signaling was analyzed by molecular methods.

RESULTS

Through integrative omics analyses, we revealed an adenosine deaminases acting on RNA 1A (ADAR1)-mediated over-editing pattern in iCCAs. ADAR1 is frequently amplified and overexpressed in iCCAs and plays oncogenic roles. Notably, we identified a novel ADAR1-mediated A-to-I editing of KPC1 transcript, which results in substitution of methionine with valine at residue 8 (p.M8V). KPC1 p.M8V editing confers loss-of-function phenotypes through blunting the tumor-suppressive role of wild-type KPC1. Mechanistically, KPC1 p.M8V weakens the affinity of KPC1 to its substrate NF-κB1 p105, thereby reducing the ubiquitinating and proteasomal processing of p105 to p50, which in turn enhances the activity of oncogenic NF-κB signaling.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings established that amplification-driven ADAR1 overexpression results in overediting of KPC1 p.M8V in iCCAs, leading to progression via activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway, and suggested ADAR1-KPC1-NF-κB axis as a potential therapeutic target for iCCA.

Cancer Genomics

In the past decade, genomics has fundamentally changed our view of cancer biology, allowing comprehensive analyses of mutations, copy number alterations, structural variants, gene expression and DNA methylation profiles in large-scale studies across different cancer types. Efforts like The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) have fostered international collaborations for cancer genomic analyses and have generated public databases that give scientists around the world access to thoroughly curated data, which have been extensively used as a tool for further hypothesis driven research on several aspects of cancer biology. In parallel, some of these findings are being translated into specific clinical benefits for cancer patients. In this review, we provide a brief historical description of the evolution of international public cancer genome projects and related databases, as well as we discuss about their impact on general cancer research.

A-to-I nonsynonymous RNA editing was significantly enriched in the ubiquitination site and correlated with clinical features and immune response

RNA editing is a post-transcriptional process that alters RNA sequence in a site-specific manner. A-to-I editing is the most abundant as well as the most well-studied type of RNA editing. About 0.5% of A-to-I editing sites were located in the coding regions. Despite of thousands of identified A-to-I nonsynonymous editing sites, the function of nonsynonymous editing was poorly studied. Here, we found that the nonsynonymous editing was significantly enriched in the ubiquitination site, compared to the synonymous editing. This enrichment was also in a modification type dependent manner, since it was not significantly enriched in other modification types. This observation was consistent with previous study that the codons for lysine (AAG and AAA) were enriched in the preferred deamination site for RNA editing. The peptides from proteomic data in CPTAC supported that mRNAs harboring edited ubiquitination sites can be translated into protein in cells. We identified the editing sites on ubiquitination site were significantly differential edited between tumor and para-tumor samples as well as among different subtypes in TCGA datasets and also correlated with clinical outcome, especially for the nonsynonymous editing sites on GSTM5, WDR1, SSR4 and PSMC4. Finally, the enrichment analysis revealed that the function of these above genes was specifically enriched in the immune response pathway. Our study shed a light on understanding the functions of nonsynonymous editing in tumorigenesis and provided nonsynonymous editing targets for potential cancer diagnosis and therapy.

RNA Editing Enzyme ADAR1 Regulates METTL3 in an Editing Dependent Manner to Promote Breast Cancer Progression via METTL3/ARHGAP5/YTHDF1 Axis

A-to-I RNA editing and m⁶A modification are two of the most prevalent types of RNA modifications controlling gene expression in mammals and play very important roles in tumorigenesis and tumor progression. However, the functional roles and correlations of these two RNA modifications remain to be further investigated in cancer. Herein, we show that ADAR1, an A-to-I RNA-editing enzyme, interacts with METTL3 and increases its protein level to promote the proliferation, migration and invasion of breast cancer cells through a mechanism connecting ADAR1, METTL3 and YTHDF1. We show that both ADAR1 and METTL3 are upregulated in breast cancer samples, and ADAR1 positively correlates with METTL3; ADAR1 edits METTL3 mRNA and changes its binding site to miR532-5p, leading to increased METTL3 protein, which further targets ARHGAP5, recognized by YTHDF1. Additionally, we show that loss of ADAR1 significantly inhibits breast cancer growth in vivo. Collectively, our findings identify the ADAR1–METTL3 axis as a novel, important pathway that connects A-to-I editing and m⁶A RNA modifications during breast cancer progression.

Unifying Different Cancer Theories in a Unique Tumour Model: Chronic Inflammation and Deaminases as Meeting Points

The increase in cancer incidences shows that there is a need to better understand tumour heterogeneity to achieve efficient treatments. Interestingly, there are several common features among almost all types of cancers, with chronic inflammation induction and deaminase dysfunctions singled out. Deaminases are a family of enzymes with nucleotide-editing capacity, which are classified into two main groups: DNA-based and RNA-based. Remarkably, a close relationship between inflammation and the dysregulation of these molecules has been widely documented, which may explain the characteristic intratumor heterogeneity, both at DNA and transcriptional levels. Indeed, heterogeneity in cancer makes it difficult to establish a unique tumour progression model. Currently, there are three main cancer models—stochastic, hierarchic, and dynamic—although there is no consensus on which one better resembles cancer biology because they are usually overly simplified. Here, to accurately explain tumour progression, we propose interactions among chronic inflammation, deaminases dysregulation, intratumor genetic heterogeneity, cancer phenotypic plasticity, and even the previously proposed appearance of cancer stem-like cell populations in the edges of advanced solid tumour masses (instead of being the cells of origin of primary malignancies). The new tumour development model proposed in this study does not contradict previously accepted models and it may open up a window to interesting therapeutic approaches.

Emerging Roles of Long Noncoding RNAs in Breast Cancer Epigenetics and Epitranscriptomics

Breast carcinogenesis is a multistep process that involves both genetic and epigenetic changes. Epigenetics refers to reversible changes in gene expression that are not accompanied by changes in gene sequence. In breast cancer (BC), dysregulated epigenetic changes, such as DNA methylation and histone modifications, are accompanied by epitranscriptomic changes, in particular adenine to inosine modifications within RNA molecules. Factors that trigger these phenomena are largely unknown, but there is evidence for widespread participation of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) that already have been linked to virtually any aspect of BC biology, making them promising biomarkers and therapeutic targets in BC patients. Here, we provide a systematic review of known and possible roles of lncRNAs in epigenetic and epitranscriptomic processes, along with methods and tools to study them, followed by a brief overview of current challenges regarding the use of lncRNAs in medical applications.

ADAR1 and AZIN1 RNA editing function as an oncogene and contributes to immortalization in endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing is a recently described epigenetic modification, which is believed to constitute a key oncogenic mechanism in human cancers. However, its functional role and clinical significance in endometrial cancer (EC) remain unclear.

METHODS

Adenosine Deaminase family Acting on RNA1 (ADAR1) expression and Antizyme inhibitor 1 (AZIN1) RNA editing were examined to clarify the correlation with clinicopathological parameters and prognosis in EC patients. The biological functions and inhibitory effects of ADAR1 knockdown were investigated in JHUCS-1 and TU-ECS-1 EC cell lines.

RESULTS

ADAR1 showed significant association with worse histology (P = 0.006), and lymph vascular space involvement (P = 0.049) in EC. The level of AZIN1 RNA editing was also significantly associated with worse histology (P = 0.012). ADAR1 expression was significantly correlated with AZIN1 RNA editing level (R = 0.729, R² = 0.547, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that higher ADAR1 expression along with AZIN1 RNA editing is an independent predictor of prognosis in EC patients (P = 0.015). Knockdown of ADAR1 led to increased MDA-5, RIG-I, PKR, and IRF-7 expression, which in turn resulted in increased levels of Bak and apoptosis in EC cells.

CONCLUSIONS

High ADAR1 expression along with AZIN1 RNA editing could be a predictor of worse prognosis in EC. ADAR1 could be a potential therapeutic target in EC patients.

Spatial epitranscriptomics reveals A-to-I editome specific to cancer stem cell microniches

Epitranscriptomic features, such as single-base RNA editing, are sources of transcript diversity in cancer, but little is understood in terms of their spatial context in the tumour microenvironment. Here, we introduce spatial-histopathological examination-linked epitranscriptomics converged to transcriptomics with sequencing (Select-seq), which isolates regions of interest from immunofluorescence-stained tissue and obtains transcriptomic and epitranscriptomic data. With Select-seq, we analyse the cancer stem cell-like microniches in relation to the tumour microenvironment of triple-negative breast cancer patients. We identify alternative splice variants, perform complementarity-determining region analysis of infiltrating T cells and B cells, and assess adenosine-to-inosine base editing in tumour tissue sections. Especially, in triple-negative breast cancer microniches, adenosine-to-inosine editome specific to different microniche groups is identified.

The spatial context of epitranscriptomic features in the tumour microenvironment remains poorly understood. Here, a method for transcriptomic and epitranscriptomic analysis of immunofluorescence-stained tissue, Select-seq, is applied to stem cell-like microniches in triple negative breast cancer.

Increase in ADAR1p110 activates the canonical Wnt signaling pathway associated with aggressive phenotype in triple negative breast cancer cells

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents a challenge in the search for new therapeutic targets. TNBCs are aggressive and generate resistance to chemotherapy. Tumors of TNBC patients with poor prognosis present a high level of adenosine deaminase acting on RNA1 (ADAR1). We explore the connection of ADAR1 with the canonical Wnt signaling pathway and the effect of modulation of its expression in TNBC. Expression data from cell line sequencing (DepMap) and TCGA samples were downloaded and analyzed. We lentivirally generated an MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell line that overexpress (OE) ADAR1p110 or an ADAR knockdown. Abundance of different proteins related to Wnt/β-catenin pathway and activity of nuclear β-catenin were analyzed by Western blot and luciferase TOP/FOP reporter assay, respectively. Cell invasion was analyzed by matrigel assay. In mice, we study the behavior of tumors generated from ADAR1p110 (OE) cells and tumor vascularization immunostaining were analyzed. ADAR1 connects to the canonical Wnt pathway in TNBC. ADAR1p110 overexpression decreased GSK-3β, while increasing active β-catenin. It also increased the activity of nuclear β-catenin and increased its target levels. ADAR1 knockdown has the opposite effect. MDA-MB-231 ADAR1 (OE) cells showed increased capacity of invasion. Subsequently, we observed that tumors derived from ADAR1p110 (OE) cells showed increased invasion towards the epithelium, and increased levels of Survivin and CD-31 expressed in vascular endothelial cells. These results indicate that ADAR1 overexpression alters the expression of some key components of the canonical Wnt pathway, favoring invasion and neovascularization, possibly through activation of the β-catenin, which suggests an unknown role of ADAR1p110 in aggressiveness of TNBC tumors.

ADAR1 and its implications in cancer development and treatment

The family of adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADARs) regulates global gene expression output by catalyzing adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) editing of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) and through interacting with RNA and other proteins. ADARs play important roles in development and disease, including an increasing connection to cancer progression. ADAR1 has demonstrated a largely pro-oncogenic role in a growing list of cancer types, and its function in cancer has been attributed to diverse mechanisms. Here, we review existing literature on ADAR1 biology and function, its roles in human disease including cancer, and summarize known cancer-associated phenotypes and mechanisms. Lastly, we discuss implications and outstanding questions in the field, including strategies for targeting ADAR1 in cancer.

RNA Editing in Glioma as a Sexually Dimorphic Prognostic Factor That Affects mRNA Abundance in Fatty Acid Metabolism and Inflammation Pathways

RNA editing alters the nucleotide sequence and has been associated with cancer progression. However, little is known about its prognostic and regulatory roles in glioma, one of the most common types of primary brain tumors. We characterized and analyzed RNA editomes of glioblastoma and isocitrate dehydrogenase mutated (IDH-MUT) gliomas from The Cancer Genome Atlas and the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA). We showed that editing change during glioma progression was another layer of molecular alterations and that editing profiles predicted the prognosis of glioblastoma and IDH-MUT gliomas in a sex-dependent manner. Hyper-editing was associated with poor survival in females but better survival in males. Moreover, noncoding editing events impacted mRNA abundance of the host genes. Genes associated with inflammatory response (e.g., EIF2AK2, a key mediator of innate immunity) and fatty acid oxidation (e.g., acyl-CoA oxidase 1, the rate-limiting enzyme in fatty acid β-oxidation) were editing-regulated and associated with glioma progression. The above findings were further validated in CGGA samples. Establishment of the prognostic and regulatory roles of RNA editing in glioma holds promise for developing editing-based therapeutic strategies against glioma progression. Furthermore, sexual dimorphism at the epitranscriptional level highlights the importance of developing sex-specific treatments for glioma.

Current Status of Epitranscriptomic Marks Affecting lncRNA Structures and Functions

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) belong to a class of non-protein-coding RNAs with their lengths longer than 200 nucleotides. Most of the mammalian genome is transcribed as RNA, yet only a small percent of the transcribed RNA corresponds to exons of protein-coding genes. Thus, the number of lncRNAs is predicted to be several times higher than that of protein-coding genes. Because of sheer number of lncRNAs, it is often difficult to elucidate the functions of all lncRNAs, especially those arising from their relationship to their binding partners, such as DNA, RNA, and proteins. Due to their binding to other macromolecules, it has become evident that the structures of lncRNAs influence their functions. In this regard, the recent development of epitranscriptomics (the field of study to investigate RNA modifications) has become important to further elucidate the structures and functions of lncRNAs. In this review, the current status of lncRNA structures and functions influenced by epitranscriptomic marks is discussed.

ADARs act as potent regulators of circular transcriptome in cancer

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are produced by head-to-tail back-splicing which is mainly facilitated by base-pairing of reverse complementary matches (RCMs) in circRNA flanking introns. Adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADARs) are known to bind double-stranded RNAs for adenosine to inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing. Here we characterize ADARs as potent regulators of circular transcriptome by identifying over a thousand of circRNAs regulated by ADARs in a bidirectional manner through and beyond their editing function. We find that editing can stabilize or destabilize secondary structures formed between RCMs via correcting A:C mismatches to I(G)-C pairs or creating I(G).U wobble pairs, respectively. We provide experimental evidence that editing also favors the binding of RNA-binding proteins such as PTBP1 to regulate back-splicing. These ADARs-regulated circRNAs which are ubiquitously expressed in multiple types of cancers, demonstrate high functional relevance to cancer. Our findings support a hitherto unappreciated bidirectional regulation of circular transcriptome by ADARs and highlight the complexity of cross-talk in RNA processing and its contributions to tumorigenesis.

RNA editing and circRNAs are involved in tumorigenesis. Here the authors report that ADARs regulate the circular transcriptome in a bidirectional manner through and beyond their editing function in multiple cancer cells.

RNA modification writers influence tumor microenvironment in gastric cancer and prospects of targeted drug therapy

Background: RNA adenosine modifications are crucial for regulating RNA levels. N6-methyladenosine (m6A), N1-methyladenosine (m1A), adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing, and alternative polyadenylation (APA) are four major RNA modification types. Methods: We evaluated the altered mRNA expression profiles of 27 RNA modification enzymes and compared the differences in tumor microenvironment (TME) and clinical prognosis between two RNA modification patterns using unsupervised clustering. Then, we constructed a scoring system, WM_score, and quantified the RNA modifications in patients of gastric cancer (GC), associating WM_score with TME, clinical outcomes, and effectiveness of targeted therapies. Results: RNA adenosine modifications strongly correlated with TME and could predict the degree of TME cell infiltration, genetic variation, and clinical prognosis. Two modification patterns were identified according to high and low WM_scores. Tumors in the WM_score-high subgroup were closely linked with survival advantage, CD4[Formula: see text] T-cell infiltration, high tumor mutation burden, and cell cycle signaling pathways, whereas those in the WM_score-low subgroup showed strong infiltration of inflammatory cells and poor survival. Regarding the immunotherapy response, a high WM_score showed a significant correlation with PD-L1 expression, predicting the effect of PD-L1 blockade therapy. Conclusion: The WM_scoring system could facilitate scoring and prediction of GC prognosis.

Landscape of adenosine-to-inosine RNA recoding across human tissues

RNA editing by adenosine deaminases changes the information encoded in the mRNA from its genomic blueprint. Editing of protein-coding sequences can introduce novel, functionally distinct, protein isoforms and diversify the proteome. The functional importance of a few recoding sites has been appreciated for decades. However, systematic methods to uncover these sites perform poorly, and the full repertoire of recoding in human and other mammals is unknown. Here we present a new detection approach, and analyze 9125 GTEx RNA-seq samples, to produce a highly-accurate atlas of 1517 editing sites within the coding region and their editing levels across human tissues. Single-cell RNA-seq data shows protein recoding contributes to the variability across cell subpopulations. Most highly edited sites are evolutionary conserved in non-primate mammals, attesting for adaptation. This comprehensive set can facilitate understanding of the role of recoding in human physiology and diseases.

Gabay et al. provide a highly-accurate atlas of recoding by A-to-I RNA editing in human, profiled across tissues and cell subpopulations. Most highly edited sites are evolutionary conserved in non-primate mammals, attesting for adaptation.

Transcriptome profiling of ADAR1 targets in triple-negative breast cancer cells reveals mechanisms for regulating growth and invasion

ADARs catalyze Adenosine-to-Inosine (A-to-I) editing of double-stranded RNA and regulate global gene expression output through interactions with RNA and other proteins. ADARs play important roles in development and disease, and previous work has shown that ADAR1 is oncogenic in a growing list of cancer types. Here we show that ADAR1 is a critical gene for triple-negative breast cancer cells, as ADAR1 loss results in reduced growth (viability and cell cycle progression), invasion, and mammosphere formation. Whole transcriptome sequencing analyses demonstrate that ADAR1 regulates both coding and non-coding targets by altering gene expression level, A-to-I editing, and splicing. We determine that a recoding edit in filamin B (FLNB chr3:58156064) reduces the tumor suppressive activities of the protein to promote growth and invasion. We also show that several tumor suppressor microRNAs are upregulated upon ADAR1 loss and suppress cell cycle progression and invasion. Implications: This work describes several novel mechanisms of ADAR1-mediated oncogenesis in triple-negative breast cancer, providing support to strategies targeting ADAR1 in this aggressive cancer type that has few treatment options.

Roles of Major RNA Adenosine Modifications in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the sixth most common cancer malignancy worldwide and is known to have poor prognosis. The pathogenesis behind the development of HNSCC is not fully understood. Modifications on RNA are involved in many pathophysiological processes, such as tumor development and inflammation. Adenosine-related RNA modifications have shown to be linked to cancer and may play a role in cancer occurrence and development. To date, there are at least 170 different chemical RNA modifications that modify coding and non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs). These modifications affect RNA stability and transcription efficiency. In this review, we focus on the current understanding of the four major RNA adenosine modifications (N⁶-Methyladenosine, N¹-Methyladenosine, Alternative Polyadenylation Modification and A-to-I RNA editing) and their potential molecular mechanisms related to HNSCC development and progression. We also touch on how these RNA modifications affect treatment of HNSCCs.

RNA modifications act as regulators of cell death

Currently, more than one hundred types of RNA modifications have been found, and many of these modifications are reversible and dynamically regulated. RNA modifications can regulate RNA stability and translation and are thus involved in multiple biological activities. Recently, RNA modifications have been shown to have important roles in the regulation of cell death. Cell death is a critical process that maintains tissue homoeostasis and is regulated by multiple pathways in response to specific stimuli. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of the roles of RNA modifications in cell death mediation and discuss the prospects of such research.Abbreviations: m6A, N6-Methyladenosine; m6Am, N6,2'-O-Dimethyladenosine; m1A, N1-Methyladenosine; m5C, 5-Methylcytosine; hm5C, 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine; Ψ, pseudouridine; A-to-I, adenosine-to- inosine; hnRNPs, heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins; MOMP, mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization; DD, death domain; DISC, death-inducing signalling complex; DED, death effector domain; FADD, FAS-associated protein with the death domain; TRADD, TNF receptor-associated protein with death domain; CMA, chaperone- mediated autophagy; PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; AD, alzheimer's disease; AML, acute myeloid leukaemia; miR, microRNA; 6-OHDA, 6-hydroxydopamine hydrochloride; R-2HG, R-2-hydroxyglutarate; IRES, internal ribosome entry site; BMSCs, bone-derived mesenchymal stem cells; NPCs, nucleus pulposus cells; HsCG, human chorionic gonadotropin; snoRNAs, small nucleolar RNAs; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; lncRNAs, long noncoding RNAs; TNM, tumour-node-metastasis.

8-azaadenosine and 8-chloroadenosine are not selective inhibitors of ADAR

The RNA editing enzyme ADAR, is an attractive therapeutic target for multiple cancers. Through its deaminase activity, ADAR edits adenosine to inosine in dsRNAs. Loss of ADAR in some cancer cell lines causes activation of the type I interferon pathway and the PKR translational repressor, leading to inhibition of proliferation and stimulation of cell death. As such, inhibition of ADAR function is a viable therapeutic strategy for many cancers. However, there are no FDA approved inhibitors of ADAR. Two small molecules have been previously shown to inhibit ADAR or reduce its expression: 8-azaadenosine and 8-chloroadenosine. Here we show that neither molecule is a selective inhibitor of ADAR. Both 8-azaadenosine and 8-chloroadenosine show similar toxicity to ADAR-dependent and independent cancer cell lines. Furthermore, the toxicity of both small molecules is comparable between cell lines with either knockdown or overexpression of ADAR, and cells with unperturbed ADAR expression. Treatment with neither molecule causes activation of PKR. Finally, treatment with either molecule has no effect on A-to-I editing of multiple ADAR substrates. Together these data show that 8-azaadenosine and 8-chloroadenosine are not suitable small molecules for therapies that require selective inhibition of ADAR, and neither should be used in preclinical studies as ADAR inhibitors.

ADAR1 restricts ZBP1-mediated immune response and PANoptosis to promote tumorigenesis

Cell death provides host defense and maintains homeostasis. Zα-containing molecules are essential for these processes. Z-DNA binding protein 1 (ZBP1) activates inflammatory cell death, PANoptosis, whereas adenosine deaminase acting on RNA 1 (ADAR1) serves as an RNA editor to maintain homeostasis. Here, we identify and characterize ADAR1's interaction with ZBP1, defining its role in cell death regulation and tumorigenesis. Combining interferons (IFNs) and nuclear export inhibitors (NEIs) activates ZBP1-dependent PANoptosis. ADAR1 suppresses this PANoptosis by interacting with the Zα2 domain of ZBP1 to limit ZBP1 and RIPK3 interactions. Adar1fl/flLysMcre mice are resistant to development of colorectal cancer and melanoma, but deletion of the ZBP1 Zα2 domain restores tumorigenesis in these mice. In addition, treating wild-type mice with IFN-γ and the NEI KPT-330 regresses melanoma in a ZBP1-dependent manner. Our findings suggest that ADAR1 suppresses ZBP1-mediated PANoptosis, promoting tumorigenesis. Defining the functions of ADAR1 and ZBP1 in cell death is fundamental to informing therapeutic strategies for cancer and other diseases.

RNA Modifications and Epigenetics in Modulation of Lung Cancer and Pulmonary Diseases

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, and its tumorigenesis involves the accumulation of genetic and epigenetic events in the respiratory epithelium. Epigenetic modifications, such as DNA methylation, RNA modification, and histone modifications, have been widely reported to play an important role in lung cancer development and in other pulmonary diseases. Whereas the functionality of DNA and chromatin modifications referred to as epigenetics is widely characterized, various modifications of RNA nucleotides have recently come into prominence as functionally important. N6-methyladosine (m6A) is the most prevalent internal modification in mRNAs, and its machinery of writers, erasers, and readers is well-characterized. However, several other nucleotide modifications of mRNAs and various noncoding RNAs have also been shown to play an important role in the regulation of biological processes and pathology. Such epitranscriptomic modifications play an important role in regulating various aspects of RNA metabolism, including transcription, translation, splicing, and stability. The dysregulation of epitranscriptomic machinery has been implicated in the pathological processes associated with carcinogenesis including uncontrolled cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. In recent years, with the advancement of RNA sequencing technology, high-resolution maps of different modifications in various tissues, organs, or disease models are being constantly reported at a dramatic speed. This facilitates further understanding of the relationship between disease development and epitranscriptomics, shedding light on new therapeutic possibilities. In this review, we summarize the basic information on RNA modifications, including m6A, m1A, m5C, m7G, pseudouridine, and A-to-I editing. We then demonstrate their relation to different kinds of lung diseases, especially lung cancer. By comparing the different roles RNA modifications play in the development processes of different diseases, this review may provide some new insights and offer a better understanding of RNA epigenetics and its involvement in pulmonary diseases.

Regulatory roles of RNA modifications in breast cancer

Collectively referred to as the epitranscriptome, RNA modifications play important roles in gene expression control regulating relevant cellular processes. In the last few decades, growing numbers of RNA modifications have been identified not only in abundant ribosomal (rRNA) and transfer RNA (tRNA) but also in messenger RNA (mRNA). In addition, many writers, erasers and readers that dynamically regulate the chemical marks have also been characterized. Correct deposition of RNA modifications is prerequisite for cellular homeostasis, and its alteration results in aberrant transcriptional programs that dictate human disease, including breast cancer, the most frequent female malignancy, and the leading cause of cancer-related death in women. In this review, we emphasize the major RNA modifications that are present in tRNA, rRNA and mRNA. We have categorized breast cancer-associated chemical marks and summarize their contribution to breast tumorigenesis. In addition, we describe less abundant tRNA modifications with related pathways implicated in breast cancer. Finally, we discuss current limitations and perspectives on epitranscriptomics for use in therapeutic strategies against breast and other cancers.

An ADAR1-dependent RNA editing event in the cyclin-dependent kinase CDK13 promotes thyroid cancer hallmarks

Background

Adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADARs) modify many cellular RNAs by catalyzing the conversion of adenosine to inosine (A-to-I), and their deregulation is associated with several cancers. We recently showed that A-to-I editing is elevated in thyroid tumors and that ADAR1 is functionally important for thyroid cancer cell progression. The downstream effectors regulated or edited by ADAR1 and the significance of ADAR1 deregulation in thyroid cancer remain, however, poorly defined.

Methods

We performed whole transcriptome sequencing to determine the consequences of ADAR1 deregulation for global gene expression, RNA splicing and editing. The effects of gene silencing or RNA editing were investigated by analyzing cell viability, proliferation, invasion and subnuclear localization, and by protein and gene expression analysis.

Results

We report an oncogenic function for CDK13 in thyroid cancer and identify a new ADAR1-dependent RNA editing event that occurs in the coding region of its transcript. CDK13 was significantly over-edited (c.308A > G) in tumor samples and functional analysis revealed that this editing event promoted cancer cell hallmarks. Finally, we show that CDK13 editing increases the nucleolar abundance of the protein, and that this event might explain, at least partly, the global change in splicing produced by ADAR1 deregulation.

Conclusions

Overall, our data support A-to-I editing as an important pathway in cancer progression and highlight novel mechanisms that might be used therapeutically in thyroid and other cancers.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12943-021-01401-y.

Decoupling expression and editing preferences of ADAR1 p150 and p110 isoforms

Human adenosine deaminase acting on RNA 1 (ADAR1) catalyzes adenosine-to-inosine deamination reactions on double-stranded RNA molecules to regulate cellular responses to endogenous and exogenous RNA. Defective ADAR1 editing leads to disorders such as Aicardi-Goutières syndrome, an autoinflammatory disease that manifests in the brain and skin, and dyschromatosis symmetrica hereditaria, a skin pigmentation disorder. Two ADAR1 protein isoforms, p150 (150 kDa) and p110 (110 kDa), are expressed and can edit RNA, but the contribution of each isoform to the editing landscape remains unclear, largely because of the challenges in expressing p150 without p110. In this study, we demonstrate that p110 is coexpressed with p150 from the canonical p150-encoding mRNA due to leaky ribosome scanning downstream of the p150 start codon. The presence of a strong Kozak consensus context surrounding the p110 start codon suggests the p150 mRNA is optimized to leak p110 alongside expression of p150. To reduce leaky scanning and translation initiation at the p110 start codon, we introduced synonymous mutations in the coding region between the p150 and p110 start codons. Cells expressing p150 constructs with these mutations produced significantly reduced levels of p110. Editing analysis of total RNA from ADAR1 knockout cells reconstituted separately with modified p150 and p110 revealed that more than half of the A-to-I edit sites are selectively edited by p150, and the other half are edited by either p150 or p110. This method of isoform-selective editing analysis, making use of the modified p150, has the potential to be adapted for other cellular contexts.

RNA editing enzyme adenosine deaminases acting on RNA 1 deficiency increases the sensitivity of non-small cell lung cancer cells to anlotinib by regulating CX3CR1-fractalkine expression

Adenosine deaminases acting on RNA 1 (ADAR1) has been identified to play key roles in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) progression, and can modulate the sensitivity of cancer cells to anticancer drugs. The current study aimed to investigate the effect of ADAR1 on the sensitivity of NSCLC cells to anlotinib. We established anlotinib-resistant NSCLC (NSCLC/AR) cells, including NCI-H1975/AR and A549/AR cells. Results showed that ADAR1 was significantly upregulated in NSCLC/AR cells. Genetic-knockdown of ADAR1 increased the sensitivity of NSCLC/AR cells to anlotinib by inducing cell proliferation suppression, cell cycle arrest, and apoptosis. Furthermore, knockdown of ADAR1 decreased the level of C-X3-C motif chemokine ligand 1 (CX3CL1) in NCI-H1975/AR and A549/AR cells after anlotinib treatment. Introduction of exogenous CX3CL1 significantly reversed the positive effect of ADAR1 deficiency on NSCLC/AR cell sensitivity, exhibited by the increase of cell viability and decrease of apoptosis. Further in-vivo study demonstrated that knockdown of ADAR1 inhibited NCI-H1975/AR cell tumorigenesis by reducing CX3CL1 expression. Collectively, ADAR1 deficiency increased the sensitivity of NSCLC/AR cells to anlotinib by downregulating CX3CL1, which might provide a potential strategy for NSCLC/AR therapy.

Direct Immunodetection of Global A-to-I RNA Editing Activity with a Chemiluminescent Bioassay

Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) editing is a conserved eukaryotic RNA modification that contributes to development, immune response, and overall cellular function. Here, we utilize Endonuclease V (EndoV), which binds specifically to inosine in RNA, to develop an EndoV-linked immunosorbency assay (EndoVLISA) as a rapid, plate-based chemiluminescent method for measuring global A-to-I editing signatures in cellular RNA. We first optimize and validate our assay with chemically synthesized oligonucleotides. We then demonstrate rapid detection of inosine content in treated cell lines, demonstrating equivalent performance against current standard RNA-seq approaches. Lastly, we deploy our EndoVLISA for profiling differential A-to-I RNA editing signatures in normal and diseased human tissue, illustrating the utility of our platform as a diagnostic bioassay. Together, the EndoVLISA method is cost-effective, straightforward, and utilizes common laboratory equipment, offering a highly accessible new approach for studying A-to-I editing. Moreover, the multi-well plate format makes this the first assay amenable for direct high-throughput quantification of A-to-I editing for applications in disease detection and drug development.