Efficient identification and evaluation of effective Helicobacter pylori therapies

An Update on Eradication of Helicobacter Pylori in Iran: A Review

Background

Helicobacter pylori, the most prevalent infection in the world, has great importance due to being related to peptic ulcer disease, gastric metaplasia, dysplasia, and even gastric adenocarcinoma or mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma. The standard H. pylori eradication regimen is based on antibiotic susceptibility testing. If susceptibility testing is not available, a standard treatment regimen will be recommended based on records of H. pylori resistance rates to antibiotics in a region or locally proven highly effective regimens (equal to or higher than 90% eradication rate). The aim of this review was to define suitable recommendations for local treatment in different cities of Iran.

Methods

This review article consists of randomized controlled trials related to H. pylori eradication in Iran. Data including the kind of therapy, number of patients and per-protocol H. pylori eradication rates were recorded in data gathering forms. Data search was conducted in PubMed and Google Scholar databases from 2018 to December 2023.

Results

According to our review of Iranian articles regarding first-line H. pylori eradication regimens, these treatment protocols could be recommended: Bismuth-clarithromycin quadruple therapy in Ardabil, bismuth-clarithromycin quadruple therapy with probiotics in Birjand, standard triple therapy in Ilam, bismuth quadruple therapy or bismuth triple therapy or concomitant regimen in Sari, sequential therapy in Tehran and bismuth quadruple therapy in Yazd. These regimes can be extended to other regions that have a similar situation. According to the reports of Iranian researchers, a quinolone-containing regimen (levofloxacin preferred) is recommended for second-line eradication therapy.

Conclusion

Various H. pylori eradication regimens can be used as first-line therapy; however, choices for second-line therapy are limited. We recommend the quinolone-containing regimens as the preferred second-line therapy.

Efficacy and tolerability of Helicobacter pylori eradication regimes in South Kivu, Eastern of the Democratic Republic of Congo: A single center observational study

Background and Aims

Treating Helicobacter pylori infections has become a major challenge due to increased antibiotic resistance. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of the main standard regimens recommended for H. pylori eradication in Bukavu, Eastern of the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Methods

The study enrolled patients with evidence of H. pylori infection in histological examination or serology testing combined with a positive fecal antigen test. As first-line treatment, patients were randomized to either a 10-days (OAC-10) or a 14-days (OAC-14) regimen, employing a combination of omeprazole 20 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, and clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily. In case of failure, a second line regimen was evaluated and included two others protocols: OAC-10 regimen + levofloxacin 500 mg (OAC-10+) and the bismuth-based therapy (pantoprazole + bismuth salt + metronidazole + tetracycline) during 10 days. Our primary endpoint was H. pylori eradication and secondarily, the compliance and adverse effects were also evaluated.

Results

A total of 179 patients were enrolled. The eradication rate was 79.2% and 80.5% with the OAC-10 and OAC-14 regimen, respectively (p = 0.796). Adverse effects were significant higher in the OAC-14 group than in the OAC-10 group (36.5% vs. 57.8%; p < 0.001). On the other hand, the compliance rate was slightly higher in the OAC-10 group (97.9% vs. 91.6%, p = 0.052) while clinical improvement was almost similar in both groups. Regarding the second line regimen, the bismuth-based therapy (n = 18) seemed to show a better response with 100% of eradication rate and 100% of clinical improvement.

Conclusion

The classic 10-days triple therapy seems to be as effective as the 14-days regimen while having in addition a good tolerance. Apart from cost issues, the bismuth-based therapy seems to be a very good alternative in case of first-line treatment failure.

Efficacy and Safety of Vonoprazan-Based Quadruple Therapy for the Eradication of Helicobacter pylori in Patients with Peptic Ulcers: A Pooled Analysis of Two Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Phase 3 Trials

Helicobacter pylori eradication is crucial in the treatment of peptic ulcers caused by H. pylori infection, a disease highly prevalent in Asia. We present a pooled analysis of two randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3 studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan-based bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for H. pylori eradication. Patients aged ≥18 years with endoscopically confirmed duodenal or gastric ulcers were randomized 1 : 1 to receive vonoprazan 20 mg or lansoprazole 30 mg once daily for up to 6 (duodenal ulcers) or 8 weeks (gastric ulcers). H. pylori-positive patients received vonoprazan- or lansoprazole-based bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for the first 2 weeks. H. pylori eradication was determined using the carbon-13 urea breath test at a follow-up visit 4 weeks post-treatment. The H. pylori eradication rate was 90.6% with vonoprazan vs. 85.2% with lansoprazole (difference: 5.4%; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.1, 10.8). H. pylori eradication rates were 7.1% (95% CI: 1.4, 12.8) and 12.6% (95% CI: 3.9, 22.0) higher in patients aged <65 years and current smokers, respectively, with vonoprazan vs. lansoprazole. In the Chinese subpopulation, the H. pylori eradication rate was 92.0% with vonoprazan vs. 86.0% with lansoprazole (difference: 6.1%; 95% CI: 0.5, 11.7). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 72.7 vs. 62.6% of H. pylori-positive patients at baseline in the vonoprazan vs. lansoprazole arm. H. pylori eradication with vonoprazan-based quadruple therapy was noninferior to lansoprazole-based quadruple therapy and exceeded 90%, a clinically relevant threshold for determining the efficacy of H. pylori eradication regimens (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03050359; NCT03050307).

Pilot studies of vonoprazan-containing Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy suggest Thailand may be more similar to the US than Japan

BACKGROUND

Vonoprazan-containing Helicobacter pylori eradication is reliably effective in Japan. Its effectiveness in other countries remains unclear. Here, we examined vonoprazan-H. pylori therapies in Thailand.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was pilot study of four different vonoprazan containing therapies. Subjects were randomized to: 14-day dual therapy (500 mg amoxicillin q.i.d. plus 20 mg vonoprazan b.i.d.), 14-day triple therapy (amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d., slow release clarithromycin-MR, 1 g daily plus vonoprazan 20 mg b.i.d.), 7-day high-dose vonoprazan triple therapy (amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d., clarithromycin-MR 1 g daily and 60 mg vonoprazan once daily), and 14-day vonoprazan triple therapy plus bismuth (amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d., clarithromycin-MR 1 g daily, vonoprazan 20 mg b.i.d., and bismuth subsalicylate 1048 mg b.i.d.). Eradication was confirmed 4 weeks after therapy. Antimicrobial susceptibility and CYP3A4/5 genotyping were performed.

RESULTS

One hundred H. pylori-infected patients (mean age 54.3 ± 13 years, 51% men) were randomized. All were CYP3A4 extensive metabolizers. Cure rates with both 14-day vonoprazan dual therapy and 14-day triple therapy were low: 66.7%; 95% CI = 43-85% (14/21), and 59.3%; 95% CI = 39-78%) (16/27), respectively. In contrast, 7-day high-dose vonoprazan triple therapy and 14-day vonoprazan triple plus bismuth proved effective 92.3%; 95% CI = 75%-99% (24/26) and 96.2%; 95% CI = 80%-100% (25/26), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Both 14-day vonoprazan dual and triple therapy were ineffective for H. pylori eradication in Thailand. Higher dosage of vonoprazan, and/or the addition of bismuth may be required to achieve high H. pylori eradication rates. High-dose vonoprazan triple therapy and vonoprazan triple therapy adding bismuth might be used as first-line treatments in some regions with high efficacy irrespective of CYP3A4/5 genotype and clarithromycin resistance.

Synthesis, Docking Studies and Evaluation of Chalcones as Anti-Helicobacter pylori and antitumoral Agents

Helicobacter pylori colonizes the gastric epithelium of 50 % of world population and it is the main etiological agent of human chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer, and gastric cancer. In this study, we synthesized and characterized a series of 14 chalcones and evaluated their anti-H. pylori, NO inhibition (in vitro and in silico), and AGS cells cytotoxic effects. Compounds 3b and 3h showed MIC of 8 μg/mL. We observed structure-activity relationships, mainly related to the influence of methoxy substituent at C-2 (3b) and the nitro group at C-4 (3h) in chalcone scaffold. The fourteen chalcones inhibited the NO production in LPS-stimulated macrophages and showed potential for interaction on the active site of the iNOS enzyme. Finally, 3b and 3h showed the highest selectivity to the AGS cell lines. Thus, ours results suggest 3b and 3h as potential candidates for design of new and effective agents against H. pylori and related diseases.

Antibiotic Resistance, Susceptibility Testing and Stewardship in Helicobacter pylori Infection

Despite the declining trend of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) prevalence around the globe, ongoing efforts are still needed to optimize current and future regimens in view of the increasing antibiotic resistance. The resistance of H. pylori to different antibiotics is caused by different molecular mechanisms, and advancements in sequencing technology have come a far way in broadening our understanding and in facilitating the testing of antibiotic susceptibility to H. pylori. In this literature review, we give an overview of the molecular mechanisms behind resistance, as well as discuss and compare different antibiotic susceptibility tests based on the latest research. We also discuss the principles of antibiotic stewardship and compare the performance of empirical therapies based on up-to-date resistance patterns and susceptibility-guided therapies in providing effective H. pylori treatment. Studies and clinical guidelines should ensure that the treatment being tested or recommended can reliably achieve a pre-agreed acceptable level of eradication rate and take into account the variations in antibiotic resistance across populations. Local, regional and international organizations must work together to establish routine antibiotic susceptibility surveillance programs and enforce antibiotic stewardship in the treatment of H. pylori, so that it can be managed in a sustainable and efficient manner.

Is hybrid therapy more efficient in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection? A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Hybrid therapy (HT) is a non-bismuth quadruple therapy created to surpass Helicobacter pylori's (H. pylori) resistance rates to antibiotics. HT has excellent eradication rates, as well as a very good compliance and safety profile. We aim to compare HT with sequential therapy (ST) and concomitant therapy (CT) for the eradication of H. pylori.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted following the principles of the PRISMA guidelines. Literature was electronically searched on the CENTRAL library, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, LILACS, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Only randomized controlled trials were included. The primary outcome evaluated was eradication rate of H. pylori. The secondary outcomes evaluated were adverse events and compliance rates. Meta-analyses were performed with Cochrane Review Manager 5.4. The Mantel-Haenszel method was used to estimate the pooled relative risk and 95% confidence interval of the eradication rates between HT and other regimens, as well as the secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

10 studies were included, comprising 2993 patients. The mean eradication rates achieved by HT with intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses were, respectively, 86% (range: 79.2-90.8%) and 91.7% (range: 82.6-96.1%). No statistically significant difference was found in ITT eradication rate between HT and CT (relative risk: 1; 95% CI: 0.96- 1.03) and between HT and ST (relative risk: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.92-1.14). PP analysis revealed similar results. HT was associated with higher compliance rates than CT and slightly lower than ST. As far as adverse events are concerned, this meta-analysis demonstrated a higher occurrence of adverse events on the group of patients treated with CT when compared with HT. HT and ST showed similar results.

CONCLUSION

HT has similar eradication, compliance and adverse event rates when compared to ST, but a better safety profile than the CT.

The prevalence and treatment outcomes of Helicobacter pylori infection in a tertiary hospital in Thailand, 2018-2021

Background and Aim

Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection remains a significant global public health problem. This study aimed to study the prevalence of HP infection and treatment outcomes in Thailand.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the results of the urea breath test (UBT) performed at the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital between 2018 and 2021. The prevalence of HP infection was evaluated in dyspeptic patients undergoing UBT screening. In patients with known HP infection, the treatment regimen and the success rate in each patient were recorded.

Results

One-thousand nine-hundred and two patients were included in this study. The prevalence of HP infection in dyspeptic patients was 20.77% (UBT was positive in 65 out of 313 patients). Of the 1589 patients who received the first treatment regimen, 1352 (85.08%) had a negative UBT result. Patients who failed in each treatment regimen were treated with subsequent regimens. The overall success rates for the second, third, and fourth regimens were 69.87% (109 of 156 patients), 53.85% (14 of 26 patients), and 50% (3 of 6 patients), respectively. Univariate logistic regression analysis found that using lansoprazole was associated with failure of treatment with OR = 2.11 (95% CI: 1.14-3.92, P = 0.018).

Conclusion

Current primary HP treatment regimens have an eradication rate of >80%. Even though the previous regimens failed, without available antibiotic sensitivity results, the subsequent regimens were successful by at least 50%. In cases of multiple-treatment failure and where antibiotic sensitivity tests were unavailable, continuing to change regimens could provide satisfactory results.

A Bioluminescence-Based Drug Screen Identifies Activities of Fexinidazole and Its Metabolites against Helicobacter pylori

Helicobacter pylori is responsible for a wide range of gastric diseases, including gastric cancer and gastritis. With half of the world’s population infected by H. pylori and the current standard of care associated with suboptimal outcomes, a search for more effective drugs is critical. To facilitate drug screening for H. pylori, we developed a microtiter plate-based compound screening method that is faster and can screen multiple compounds. We identified activities of fexinidazole and its sulfoxide and sulfone metabolites against H. pylori. Both fexinidazole and its metabolites exhibited equipotency against SS1, 60190, and G27 strains, which were about 3–6-fold more potent than the currently used metronidazole. We also determined the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of metronidazole, fexinidazole, and its metabolites against these strains by a traditional agar plate-based method. While MIC values of fexinidazole and metronidazole were similar against all the strains, both sulfoxide and sulfone showed lower MIC values than metronidazole against SS1 and 60190. Given the recent FDA approval of fexinidazole, our data on the in vitro antibacterial activities of fexinidazole and its metabolites support further evaluation of this drug with the goal of producing an alternative nitro-based antimicrobial with good safety profiles for the treatment of H. pylori infection.

Rabeprazole plus amoxicillin dual therapy is equally effective to bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication in central China: A single-center, prospective, open-label, randomized-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic resistance emerges as a major issue for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) treatment. High-dose dual therapy has recently shown encouraging results in H. pylori eradication, but it has yet to be validated in this H. pylori highly infected area; it is also not known if this concept can be extended to antibiotics other than amoxicillin, and factors that affect the eradication. We investigate if rabeprazole plus amoxicillin or furazolidone regimens could be a first-line therapy for H. pylori eradication, and factors that affect the curing rate.

METHODS

This is a single-center, prospective, open-label, randomized-controlled trial. Naive patients (n=292) were randomly treated with bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (BQT), rabeprazole plus amoxicillin (RADT), or furazolidone (RFDT) groups. RADT and FADT use three times daily regimens. H. pylori diagnosis and eradication were determined and confirmed by ¹³ C-urea breath test.

RESULTS

In per-protocol (PP) analysis, H. pylori eradication rate was 91.2% in BQT group, 89.6% in RADT, and 51.0% in RFDT group. In intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, infection was eradicated in 86.7% of patients in BQT group, 85.8% in RADT, and 48.1% in RFDT groups, respectively. Noninferiority was confirmed between BQT and RADT groups. The incidence of side effects in BQT group was significantly higher than that in RADT group. Successful eradication was associated with lower body surface area (BSA) and low body mass index (BMI) in BQT group. Smoking and high BSA index reduced H. pylori eradication rate in RADT group.

CONCLUSIONS

Rabeprazole-amoxicillin dual therapy is equally effective to the bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for H. pylori eradication with fewer side effects and saves use of one antibiotic per each treatment. Successful eradication is also associated with low BSA and non-smoking condition, which deserves future stratified analysis for refinement and optimization.

Helicobacter pylori Biofilm-Related Drug Resistance and New Developments in Its Anti-Biofilm Agents

Helicobacter pylori is one of the most common pathogenic bacterium worldwide, infecting about 50% of the world’s population. It is a major cause of several upper gastrointestinal diseases, including peptic ulcers and gastric cancer. The emergence of H. pylori resistance to antibiotics has been a major clinical challenge in the field of gastroenterology. In the course of H. pylori infection, some bacteria invade the gastric epithelium and are encapsulated into a self-produced matrix to form biofilms that protect the bacteria from external threats. Bacteria with biofilm structures can be up to 1000 times more resistant to antibiotics than planktonic bacteria. This implies that targeting biofilms might be an effective strategy to alleviate H. pylori drug resistance. Therefore, it is important to develop drugs that can eliminate or disperse biofilms. In recent years, anti-biofilm agents have been investigated as alternative or complementary therapies to antibiotics to reduce the rate of drug resistance. This article discusses the formation of H. pylori biofilms, the relationship between biofilms and drug resistance in H. pylori, and the recent developments in the research of anti-biofilm agents targeting H. pylori drug resistance.

Errors in the diagnosis and treatment of <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> infection: in anticipation of new conciliation documents

The high prevalence of H. pylori and diseases caused by this infection determine the relevance of discussing the problems of its diagnosis and treatment on the eve of the emergence of new international and domestic agreements. Studies published in recent years, including articles on the materials of the European Registry on the management of Helicobacter pylori infection (Hp-EuReg), provide a rich background for the analysis of errors in diagnosis and treatment of this infection, and the development of approaches to optimize clinical practice.

Errors in the diagnosis and treatment of <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> infection: in anticipation of new conciliation documents

The high prevalence of H. pylori and diseases caused by this infection determine the relevance of discussing the problems of its diagnosis and treatment on the eve of the emergence of new international and domestic agreements. Studies published in recent years, including articles on the materials of the European Registry on the management of Helicobacter pylori infection (Hp-EuReg), provide a rich background for the analysis of errors in diagnosis and treatment of this infection, and the development of approaches to optimize clinical practice.

Transitioning of Helicobacter pylori Therapy from Trial and Error to Antimicrobial Stewardship

Helicobacter pylori is the only major infection for which antimicrobial therapy is not designed using the principles of antimicrobial stewardship. Traditionally, antimicrobial therapy is a susceptibility-based therapy, achieves high cure rates, and includes surveillance programs to regularly provide updated data regarding resistance, outcomes, and treatment guidelines. Current H. pylori therapies identified by trial-and-error, and treatment recommendations and guidelines are based on comparisons among regimens that rarely take into account the prevalence or effect of resistance. The majority of patients currently treated achieve suboptimal results. A paradigm shift is required to abandon current approaches and embrace antimicrobial stewardship, and therefore reliably achieve high cure rates; develop, propagate, and update best practice guidelines; and provide surveillance of local or regional susceptibility/resistance patterns. These also require timely updates to clinicians regarding the current status of resistance, antimicrobial effectiveness, and ways to prevent antimicrobial misuse to extend the useful life of currently available antibiotics. Here, we discuss the differences among current approaches to H. pylori therapy and antimicrobial stewardship and identify what is required to achieve the transition. Conceptually, the differences are significant, and the transition will likely need to be both abrupt and complete. Recommendations for therapy during the transition period are given.

Impact of previous metronidazole exposure on metronidazole-based second-line quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The negative effects on the eradication success of Helicobacter pylori infection after previous exposure to macrolides, including clarithromycin on clarithromycin-based first-line therapy have been demonstrated. However, whether this is true for metronidazole-based second-line quadruple therapy remains unclear. We investigated the relationship between past administration of metronidazole and the failure of metronidazole-based second-line quadruple therapy in patients with H. pylori infection.

METHODS

Patients over 20 years of age who were diagnosed with H. pylori infection between January 1998 and March 2016 were enrolled in this study. The relationship between the clinical parameters and the results of a C13-urea breath test after metronidazole-based second-line quadruple therapy was analyzed in patients for whom clarithromycin-based triple therapy failed to eradicate H. pylori.

RESULTS

The H. pylori eradication failure rate was significantly higher in patients with a history of metronidazole use than in patients without a history of metronidazole use (p = 0.011). Multivariable analysis showed that the odds ratio of previous metronidazole use for eradication failure was 3.468 (95% confidence interval, 1.391 to 8.649; p = 0.008). In the subgroup analysis of patients with a history of metronidazole use, the duration of metronidazole use and interval between its use and eradication therapy did not significantly affect H. pylori eradication failure.

CONCLUSION

Previous exposure to metronidazole was a significant risk factor for treatment failure of metronidazole-based second-line quadruple therapy; therefore, this should be considered when establishing a treatment strategy for patients with H. pylori infection.

Bovine lactoferrin enhances the efficacy of levofloxacin-based triple therapy as first-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: an in vitro and in vivo study

Objectives

To evaluate the in vitro antimicrobial/antivirulence action of bovine lactoferrin and its ability to synergize with levofloxacin against resistant Helicobacter pylori strains and to analyse the effect of levofloxacin, amoxicillin and esomeprazole with and without bovine lactoferrin as the first-line treatment for H. pylori infection.

Methods

The bovine lactoferrin antimicrobial/antivirulence effect was analysed in vitro by MIC/MBC determination and twitching motility against six clinical H. pylori strains and a reference strain. The synergism was evaluated using the chequerboard assay. The prospective therapeutic trial was carried out on two separate patient groups, one treated with esomeprazole/amoxicillin/levofloxacin and the other with esomeprazole/amoxicillin/levofloxacin/bovine lactoferrin. Treatment outcome was determined with the [¹³C]urea breath test.

Results

In vitro, bovine lactoferrin inhibited the growth of 50% of strains at 10 mg/mL and expressed 50% bactericidal effect at 40 mg/mL. The combination of levofloxacin and bovine lactoferrin displayed a synergistic effect for all strains, with the best MIC reduction of 16- and 32-fold for levofloxacin and bovine lactoferrin, respectively. Bovine lactoferrin at one-fourth MIC reduced microbial motility significantly for all strains studied. In the in vivo study, 6 of 24 patients recruited had treatment failure recorded with esomeprazole/amoxicillin/levofloxacin (75% success, 95% CI 57.68%–92.32%), and in the group with esomeprazole/amoxicillin/levofloxacin/bovine lactoferrin, 2 out of 53 patients recruited had failure recorded (96.07% success, 95% CI 90.62%–101.38%).

Conclusions

Bovine lactoferrin can be considered a novel potentiator for restoring susceptibility in resistant H. pylori strains. Bovine lactoferrin added to a triple therapy in first-line treatment potentiates the therapeutic effect.

Twice-a-day PPI, tetracycline, metronidazole quadruple therapy with Pylera® or Lactobacillus reuteri for treatment naïve or for retreatment of Helicobacter pylori. Two randomized pilot studies

BACKGROUND

Bismuth is no longer available in Europe except as part of combination therapy. Lactobacillus reuteri has also been used as an adjuvant for Helicobacter pylori therapy. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of a b.i.d. quadruple therapy containing Pylera® or L reuteri for H pylori infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed two open-label randomized pilot studies. Adult patients positive for H pylori were randomly assigned to b.i.d therapy with quadruple therapy containing bismuth (2 capsules of Pylera® plus 250 mg each of tetracycline and metronidazole for a total of 500 mg of each), or the same dose of antibiotics plus 2 × 10⁸  CFU L reuteri DSM 17 938 plus 2 × 10⁸  CFU L reuteri ATCC PTA 6475 (Gastrus®) once daily and pantoprazole 20 mg b.i.d. Regimens were given with meals for 10 days. Cure was defined by negative 13C-UBT or stool antigen test.

RESULTS

A total of 99 subjects (29% men) were enrolled; 92 completed the study. In the Pylera® group, H pylori infection was cured in 95.7%; 95% CI = 85%-99% (44/46) PP and 88%; 95% CI = 75%-95% (44/50) ITT vs. 84.8%; 95% CI = 71%-95% (39/46) PP and 79.6%; 95% CI = 65%-89% (39/49) ITT in the Gastrus® group, respectively. Cure rates in naїve patients were 100%; 95% CI = 85%-100% (25/25) PP with Pylera®, and 89.7%; 95% CI = 72%-97% (26/29) with Gastrus®. Compliance was excellent and side effects mild with both regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

B.i.d. bismuth quadruple therapy was highly effective for H pylori eradication in treatment of naïve patients in Sardinia. Replacement of bismuth with Gastrus® might be considered when bismuth is contraindicated or unavailable.

Once-daily rabeprazole, levofloxacin, clarithromycin-MR, and bismuth for Helicobacter pylori eradication: A randomized study of 7 or 14 days (ONCE study)

OBJECTIVE

Most therapies for Helicobacter pylori eradication utilize multiple drugs given 2-4 times daily. Patient adherence has been an impediment to reliably achieving high success. This study evaluated a once-daily dosing H pylori eradication regimen.

METHODS

A prospective randomized pilot study of H pylori eradication compared once-daily treatment regimen containing levofloxacin (750 mg), clarithromycin-MR (1 g), rabeprazole (60 mg), and bismuth subsalicylate (1,048 mg) for a 7 or 14 days. CYP2C19 genotype and antibiotic susceptibility tests were performed. Successful eradication was defined as negative 13C-urea breath test at least 4 weeks after completion of treatment.

RESULTS

100 subjects were randomized (40 men, 60 women with mean age =54 years). The eradication rates were as follows: 94% (47/50; 95%CI 0.87-1.01) and 84% (42/50; 95%CI 0.73-0.95) with 14-day and 7-day therapy (OR 0.34; 95%CI 0.08-1.35, P = 0.06), respectively. Resistance rates were as follows: 13.0% for clarithromycin, 26.0% for fluoroquinolone, 2.9% for dual clarithromycin-fluoroquinolone resistance, and 62.8% for metronidazole. The 14-day regimen provided 100% eradication in patients with levofloxacin susceptible strain irrespective of the presence of clarithromycin resistance. CYP2C19 genotypes had no effect on cure rates.

CONCLUSIONS

The once-daily 14-day rabeprazole-, levofloxacin-, clarithromycin-MR-, and bismuth-containing therapy provided high eradication rate suggested that triple therapies with a PPI, bismuth, and clarithromycin-MR or levofloxacin would be highly effective for once-a-day tailored therapy or as empiric therapy for first-line regimen.

Pylera® plus ranitidine vs Pylera® plus esomeprazole in first-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: Two pilot studies

BACKGROUND

Several studies have shown that Pylera^® (three-in-one capsules containing 140 mg bismuth potassium subcitrate, 125 metronidazole, and tetracycline 125 mg) in association with omeprazole or esomeprazole is a good option in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. In particular, the adjunction of a PPI to Pylera^® may be useful to overcome metronidazole resistance. However, omeprazole and its derivatives can promote greater bismuth absorption and enhance its toxicity. The H2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) ranitidine seems to induce less bismuth absorption and as a consequence less systemic toxicity.

AIM

To evaluate whether Pylera^® in combination with esomeprazole or with ranitidine is equally effective in the treatment of H. pylori infection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two separate groups of patients were treated simultaneously. One group was treated with Pylera^® three capsules qid plus esomeprazole 40 mg bid for 10 days (group A), and the other group was treated with Pylera^® three capsules qid plus ranitidine 300 mg bid for 10 days (group B). H. pylori eradication was defined as a negative result in ¹³ C urea breath test performed at least 8 weeks after the end of treatment with a delta-over-baseline value less than 5.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were recruited for group A and thirty-three patients in group B. Eradication rates were 93.7% (30/32) and 90.9% (30/33), respectively, at intention-to-treat analysis, and 96.6% (29/30) and 93.3% (28/30), respectively, at per-protocol analysis. Adverse events occurred in 26 patients and led to the suspension of treatment in one patient in group A and in one patient in group B.

CONCLUSION

The results showed that Pylera® plus a PPI or ranitidine were equally effective in the population studied. The high cure rates of bismuth triple therapy (without an antisecretory drug) and the lack of susceptibility testing make it impossible to exclude the possibility that the results would have been similar if neither the PPI nor the ranitidine were given.

Protocol of the European Registry on the management of Helicobacter pylori infection (Hp-EuReg)

INTRODUCTION

Helicobacter pylori selectively infects the human stomach, being the most prevalent chronic infection in the world. H pylori presence causes chronic gastritis in 100% of infected patients and is the major cause of relevant diseases such as atrophic gastritis, peptic ulcer disease, and gastric cancer; it is for this reason that from a public health standpoint, it is considered a high-impact pathogen, responsible of a significant morbidity and mortality. Nowadays, there are consensus and clinical guidelines regarding the infection management at a European level and in most of European countries, but no data have shown the level of implementation of these recommendations. The high costs that this infection carries both socially and to the health system require the continuous and systematic assessment of the diagnostic and treatment strategies, as well as the accessibility to diagnostic methods and most efficient drugs.

AIM

To register the diagnosis, management strategies, and treatment of H pylori-infected adult patients in the Digestive Services outpatient clinics throughout Europe.

METHODS

Noninterventionist prospective multicentre international Registry promoted by the European Helicobacter and Microbiota Study Group. National Coordinators will select recruiting gastroenterologists in their country that will register the H pylori-related routine clinical practice consultations they receive in an electronic case report form (e-CRF) provided by AEG-REDCap. Variables retrieved will include clinical, diagnostic, treatment, eradication confirmation, and outcome data. The database will allow researchers to perform specific subanalyses after approval by the Scientific Committee of the study.

Susceptibility-guided therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection treatment failures

BACKGROUND

Empirical therapy of Helicobacter pylori frequently results in treatment failure due to unrecognized antimicrobial resistance. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of susceptibility-guided therapy for rescue treatment of H. pylori infection in China.

METHODS

This was a prospective study of consecutive 200 patients infected with H. pylori with one or more treatment failures. The therapy chosen was susceptibility based using the most effective, best-tolerated regimens first and a locally proven, reliably effective regimen for multidrug-resistant infections. All patients received 14-day triple therapy, i.e. esomeprazole 20 mg and amoxicillin 1 g twice a day plus clarithromycin 500 mg twice a day, metronidazole 400 mg twice a day, or levofloxacin 500 mg daily, or, for multidrug-resistant infections, amoxicillin-containing bismuth quadruple therapy with esomeprazole 20 mg twice a day, bismuth 220 mg twice a day, amoxicillin 1 g three times a day, and metronidazole 400 mg four times a day. Antibiotic resistance was determined by agar dilution.

RESULTS

The eradication rate of susceptibility-guided therapy overall was 94.5% (189/200, 95% confidence interval: 90.4-97.2%). Around 28% (56/200) of patients carried strains susceptible to one of the tested antibiotics and were prescribed the triple therapy. A total of 144 multidrug-resistant patients received bismuth quadruple therapy. The eradication rates were all greater than 90%, i.e. 91.7% (11/12), 92.3% (12/13), and 93.5% (29/31) in those who received clarithromycin, metronidazole, and levofloxacin-containing triple therapy and 95.1% (137/144) for the bismuth quadruple therapy. There were no differences in eradication rates between the subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although susceptibility-guided therapy proved high efficacious despite the high proportion of multidrug-resistant strains, the strategy suggested the best approach for this population would be empirical amoxicillin-containing bismuth quadruple therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03413020.

Role of Probiotics in Helicobacter pylori Eradication: Lessons from a Study of Lactobacillus reuteri Strains DSM 17938 and ATCC PTA 6475 (Gastrus®) and a Proton-Pump Inhibitor

Background

Meta-analyses involving >4000 subjects with probiotics added to antimicrobial Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy have reported a mean increase in the eradication rate of 12 to 14%. It is unclear how to translate that result into clinical practice.

Aim

To evaluate whether administration of Lactobacillus reuteri plus a PPI without antibiotics would eradicate H. pylori infections.

Methods

This was a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized 2-site study of L. reuteri (Gastrus®) at a dose of 2 × 10⁸ CFU, 7 times per day, or matching placebo plus 20 mg pantoprazole b.i.d. for 4 weeks. Cure was defined by negative ¹³C-UBT, 4 weeks after therapy. Sample size required ≥50% cure rates for using probiotics as a clinically useful monotherapy.

Results

Recruitment was halted after 56 subjects because of the low cure rate; there were 8 dropouts; 48 subjects completed therapy (71% women, average age 49 years). The cure rates per protocol were 3/24 (12.5%; 95% CI 2.6-32%) with L. reuteri vs. 1/24 (4.1%) with placebo. Side effects (most often diarrhea) occurred infrequently (in 5/28 vs. 3/28; active vs. placebo therapy) (P=0.53).

Conclusion

L. reuteri plus a PPI therapy was unable to provide a clinically important rate of H. pylori eradication. The cure rate albeit low (12.5%) was essentially identical to that achieved when probiotics were added to antibiotic therapy. The incremental improvement was additive and independent of antimicrobial resistance or antibiotics use. Probiotics can reliably increase the cure rate to ≥90% only in regimens achieving cure rates of ∼80%. This trial is registered with NCT03404440.

Pistacia vera L. oleoresin and levofloxacin is a synergistic combination against resistant Helicobacter pylori strains

The increasing multidrug resistance in Helicobacter pylori, also correlated to its biofilm-forming ability, underlines the need to search novel strategies to improve the eradication rate. Natural compounds are proposed as antibiotic-resistant-breakers capable to restore the efficacy of conventional drugs. Aim of this work was to evaluate the capability of Pistacia vera L. oleoresin (ORS) to synergize with levofloxacin (LVX) against resistant H. pylori strains. The antimicrobial activity of P. vera L. ORS and LVX and their combinations was determined by MIC/MBC (in neutral and acidic environments) and checkerboard tests. The anti-biofilm effect was determined by biomass quantification. In vivo Galleria mellonella model was used to confirm in vitro data. Pistacia vera L. ORS and LVX MICs ranged respectively from 780 to 3120 mg/l and from 0.12 to 2.00 mg/l, at pH 7.0 and 5.5. MBCs were similar to MICs. Pistacia vera L. ORS was able to synergize with LVX, restoring its effectiveness in LVX resistant strains. Pistacia vera L. ORS, LVX and their synergistic combinations displayed significant biofilm reduction. Pistacia vera L. ORS and LVX, showed protective effect against H. pylori infection on G. mellonella (62% and 63% of survival, respectively). Pistacia vera L. ORS can be considered a promising potentiator to restore the effectiveness of LVX tackling the H. pylori antibiotic resistance phenomenon.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Two Quadruple Regimens: Bismuth, Omeprazole, Metronidazole with Amoxicillin or Tetracycline as First-Line Treatment for Eradication of Helicobacter Pylori in Patients with Duodenal Ulcer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of tetracycline vs. high-dose amoxicillin in bismuth-based quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori(H. pylori) eradication.

METHODS

This randomized, open-label clinical trial included 228 patients with H.pylori infection and duodenal ulcer without a history of H.pylori treatment. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. The amoxicillin group received metronidazole 500mg, bismuth subcitrate 240mg, and amoxicillin 1000mg, all three times a day, plus omeprazole 20 mg twice a day, for 14 days. The tetracycline group received metronidazole 500mg three times a day; bismuth subcitrate240mg and tetracycline HCl 500mg, both four times a day; and omeprazole 20 mg twice a day, for 14 days. Evaluation for compliance and drug-relatedadverse effects were evaluated at the end of two weeks. Eight weeks after the end of treatment, the rate of H.pylori eradication was assessed by the C13urease breath test.

RESULTS

There were no significant demographic differences between the two groups. Eradication rate was higher with the amoxicillin-containing regimen than the tetracycline-containing regimen: 105/110 (95.51%; 95% confidence interval, 91.5%-99.3%) vs. 88/105 (83.8%; 95%CI, 76.7%-90.8%) by per-protocol analysis (p = 0.005) and 92.9% (95%CI, 88.1%-97.6%) vs. 76.5% (95%CI, 68.7%-84.2%) by intention-to-treat analysis (ITT, p = 0.001). Adverse effects were significant higher in the tetracycline groupthan in the amoxicillin group (65.2% vs. 43.4%; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Bismuth-based quadruple therapy including high-dose amoxicillin and metronidazole achieved an acceptable rate of H.pylori infection eradication with good tolerance in patients with duodenal ulcer. This regimen can overcome treatment resistance in areas with high prevalence of metronidazole and clarithromycin resistance.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The Thai Clinical Trial Registry (TCTR) 20170623004.

Prevalence and Pattern of Antibiotic Resistant Strains of Helicobacter Pylori Infection in ASEAN

Objective: Antibiotic resistance has significantly impact on eradication rates for H. pylori infection and remains important cause of treatment failure worldwide including ASEAN countries. The aim of this study was to survey the prevalence and antibiotic resistant pattern of H. pylori infection in ASEAN. Methods: This study was a survey among 26 experts from 9 ASEAN countries including Thailand, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore and Vietnam whom attended a meeting to develop the ASEAN consensus on H. pylori management in Bangkok in November 2015. A questionnaire was sent to each member of the consensus meeting. The detail of the questionnaire included information about prevalence of H. pylori infection, facilities to perform H. pylori culture, molecular testing for antibiotic resistance and antibiotic resistance rate in their countries. Results: H. pylori infection remain common in ASEAN ranging from 20% in Malaysia, 21-54% in Thailand and 69% in Myanmar. Most of ASEAN countries can perform H. pylori cultures and antibiotic susceptibility tests except Laos and Cambodia. In ASEAN countries, metronidazole resistant H pylori is quite common whereas amoxicillin resistance remain rare. Clarithromycin resistance results in a significant decrease in H. pylori eradication rate with clarithromycin-containing regimens. The prevalence of clarithromycin resistance varies in ASEAN countries being high in Vietnam (30%) and Cambodia (43%), moderate to high in Singapore (17%) and low in Malaysia (6.8%), Philippine (2%) and Myanmar (0%). In Thailand, clarithromycin resistance tends to higher in large cities (14%) than in rural areas (~3.7%). Conclusion: ASEAN countries should develop a standard protocol for regular susceptibility testing of H. pylori so that clinicians would be better able to choose reliably effective empiric therapies. The wide range of antibiotic resistance in ASEAN countries suggests that the preferred first line regimen should be depend on the local antibiotic resistance other than single recommendation.

Helicobacter pylori management in ASEAN: The Bangkok consensus report

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection remains to be the major cause of important upper gastrointestinal diseases such as chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer, gastric adenocarcinoma, and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. H. pylori management in ASEAN: the Bangkok consensus report gathered key opinion leaders for the region to review and evaluate clinical aspects of H. pylori infection and to develop consensus statements, rationales, and grades of recommendation for the management of H. pylori infection in clinical practice in ASEAN countries. This ASEAN Consensus consisted of 34 international experts from 10 ASEAN countries, Japan, Taiwan, and the United States. The meeting mainly focused on four issues: (i) epidemiology and disease association; (ii) diagnostic tests; (iii) management; and (iv) follow-up after eradication. The final results of each workshop were presented for consensus voting by all participants. Statements, rationale, and recommendations were developed from the available current evidence to help clinicians in the diagnosis and treatment of H. pylori and its clinical diseases.

Comparison of Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens in patients with end stage renal disease

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare the Helicobacter pylori (HP) eradication regimens in patients with end stage renal disease.

BACKGROUND

In patients undergoing hemodialysis, the pathologic changes seen in the stomach may be the result of high serum levels of gastrin, delayed gastric emptying or HP infection.

METHODS

Our study was a randomized clinical trial in which 120 patients with ESRD (Patients who undergo hemodialysis) confirmed HP infection, were divided to four groups having 2-week eradication regimens; Group I: LCA (lansoprazole 30 mg-BD,clarithromycin 250 mg-BD, amoxicillin 500 mg-BD), Group II: LCM (lansoprazole 30 mg-BD,clarithromycin 250 mg-BD, metronidazole 500 mg-BD), Group III: LCAM (lansoprazole 30 mg-BD,clarithromycin 250 mg-BD,amoxicillin 500 mg-BD, metronidazole 500 mg-BD) and Group IV: Sequential (lansoprazole 30 mg-BDfor two weeks; first week: amoxicillin 500 mg-BD and second week: clarithromycin 250 mg-BD, metronidazole 500 mg-BD).6 weeks after treatment, Urea Breath Test (UBT) was performed for all patients.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 43.1±11.2 years. 55.8% of patients were male. The success rates of HP eradication in 4 groups were76.7%, 70%, 90% and 90%, respectively. HP eradication rates were not statistically different among the regimens (p=0.11). There were not significant differences among the groups regarding demographic and anthropometric variables.

CONCLUSION

The results showed there was no significant difference between the success rates of HP eradication regimens for ESRD patients. According to approved regimen for 90% eradication rate, with a lower number of medications and given the less risk of side effects and drug interactions, the sequential regimen is the best.

Effectiveness of 7-Day and 14-Day Moxifloxacin-Dexlansoprazole Based Triple Therapy and Probiotic Supplement for Helicobacter Pylori Eradication in Thai Patients with Non-Ulcer Dyspepsia: A Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study

Background: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is important cause of peptic ulcer and gastric cancer. Moxifloxacin is effective antibiotic for treatment for H. pylori. However, there were limited studies as first line therapy. Probiotics had been shown to decrease therapy-related side-effect and increase eradication rate. Aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of moxifloxacin-dexlansoprazole based triple therapy with probiotic for H. pylori treatment in Thailand. Methods: Patients with H. pylori infected gastritis were randomized to receive 7- or 14-day moxifloxacin-dexlansoprazole based triple therapy with probiotic or placebo. Regimen consisted of 60 mg dexlansoprazole twice daily, 400mg moxifloxacin once daily, 1g clarithromycin MR once daily. Probiotic used in this study was 282.5mg Saccharomyces boulardii (S. boulardii) in capsule prescribed twice daily. CYP2C19 genotyping, antibiotic susceptibility tests, and CagA genotyping were also done. Successful eradication was defined as a negative 13C-urea breath test at least 4 weeks after treatment. Results: Total of 108 subjects was enrolled (27 each to 7-and 14-day regimens with probiotic or placebo). Antibiotic susceptibility tests showed 29% fluoroquinolone, 19% metronidazole and 4% clarithromycin resistance. CYP2C19 genotyping demonstrated 43%, 47% and 11% were rapid, intermediate and poor metabolizers, respectively. CagA genes were positive in all patients. Eradication rates of 7-day and 14-day regimens with probiotic were 100%, and 93% respectively. There were no significant differences between eradication rate of 7-day and 14-day regimen with or without probiotics. Regarding side-effects, incidence of nausea, abdominal discomfort, bitter taste, and diarrhea were significantly lower in regimen with probiotic group compared with placebo(7.4%vs. 22.2%; p=0.028, 0.00%vs.14.8%; p=0.003, 35.2%vs.70.4%; p=0.0002, and 0.00%vs.9.3%; p=0.028, respectively). Conclusions: 7-day moxifloxacindexlansoprazole therapy plus S. boulardii provide an reliable cure rate of H. pylori in non-ulcer dyspeptic patients in Thailand, independent of CYP2C19 genotype. Probiotic adding also decreased side effects during the treatment.

Optimization strategies aimed to increase the efficacy of H. pylori eradication therapies

BACKGROUND

As with any other infectious disease, we should aim for treatments offering ≥90% Helicobacter pylori eradication rates in clinical practice.

AIM

To summarize optimization strategies aimed to increase the efficacy of H. pylori eradication therapies.

METHODS

A systematic bibliographic search (in PubMed up to August 2016) was designed to identify studies investigating optimization strategies aimed to increase the efficacy of H. pylori eradication therapies.

RESULTS

The most direct way to optimize a treatment is using higher doses of drugs unless it has been shown that lower doses are equally effective. Similarly, prescriptions should use 14-day duration unless a shorter scheme has been shown locally to be equally effective. Double-dose proton-pump inhibitor therapy is recommended for triple therapy and may probably increase the efficacy of nonbismuth concomitant regimen as well. The efficacy of triple therapies in the presence of resistance can be significantly improved by the addition of bismuth salts, which offer an additive effect in combination with antibiotics. Overall, probiotics seem to reduce antibiotic side effects, but the increase in eradication rates is not so evident; therefore, they cannot be generally recommended for clinical practice yet.

CONCLUSIONS

Using potent acid inhibition and/or higher antibiotic doses-especially by increasing the number of daily intakes-and lengthening treatments up to 14 days improves efficacy in most regimens and should be generally recommended. Triple therapies can be efficiently improved by the addition of bismuth salts, turning them into quadruple therapies. Finally, some treatments will require a combination of optimization strategies to significantly improve results.

Effect of IL-1 Polymorphisms, CYP2C19 Genotype and Antibiotic Resistance on Helicobacter pylori Eradication Comparing Between 10-day Sequential Therapy and 14-day Standard Triple Therapy with Four-Times-Daily-Dosing of Amoxicillin in Thailand: a Prospective Randomized Study

BACKGROUND

Studies of effects of IL-1 polymorphisms, CYP2C19 genotype together with antibiotic resistance for H. pylori eradication are rare worldwide. The present study was designed to evaluate efficacy of 10-day sequential therapy (SQT) and 14-day standard triple therapy (STT) with four- times-daily dosing of amoxicillin for H. pylori eradication related to these important host and bacterial factors in Thailand.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective randomized study was performed during March 2015 to January 2016. H. pylori infected gastritis patients were randomized to receive 10-day sequential therapy and 14-day standard triple therapy. CYP2C19 genotyping, IL1 polymorphism (IL-1B and IL-1RN genotypes) and antibiotic susceptibility tests were performed in all patients. 13C-UBT was conducted to confirm H. pylori eradication at least 4 weeks after treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients (33 males and 67 females, mean age=51.1 years) were enrolled. Eradication rate by PP analysis was 97.9% (47/48) with the 10-day SQT regimen and 87.8% (43/49) with 14-day STT regimen (97.9% vs 87.8%; p-value=0.053). Antibiotic susceptibility testing demonstrated 45% resistance to metronidazole, 14.8% to clarithromycin, and 24.1% to levofloxacin. CYP2C19 genotyping revealed 44.9% RM, 49% IM and 6.1% PM. IL-1B and IL-1RN genotypes were demonstrated as 21.4% for CC, 48.1% for TC, 36.8% for TT, 72.7% for 1/1, and 21.2% for 1/2 genotypes, respectively. The 10-day SQT regimen provided 100% eradication in patients with clarithromycin or dual clarithromycin and levofloxacin H. pylori resistant strains. Moreover, the 10-day SQT regimen resulted in a 100% eradication rate in all patients with CYP2C19 genotype RM and almost type of IL-1B (TC and TT) and IL1-RN genotypes ( 1/2 and other).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with 10-day sequential therapy is highly effective for H. pylori eradication regardless of the effects of clarithromycin resistance, dual clarithromycin and levofloxacin resistance, CYP2C19 genotype, IL-1B and IL1-RN genetic polymorphisms and can be used as effective first line therapy in Thailand.

Clinical importance of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug enteropathy: the relevance of tumor necrosis factor as a promising target

The pathogenesis of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) enteropathy is still unclear, and consequently, there is no approved therapeutic strategy for ameliorating such damage. On the other hand, molecular treatment strategies targeting tumor necrosis factor (TNF) exerts beneficial effects on NSAID-induced intestinal lesions in rodents and rheumatoid arthritis patients. Thus, TNF appears to be a potential therapeutic target for both the prevention and treatment of NSAID enteropathy. However, the causative relationship between TNF and NSAID enteropathy is largely unknown. Currently approved anti-TNF agents are highly expensive and exhibit numerous side effects. Hence, in this review, the pivotal role of TNF in NSAID enteropathy has been summarized and plant-derived polyphenols have been suggested as useful alternative anti-TNF agents because of their ability to suppress TNF activated inflammatory pathways both in vitro and in vivo.

High Dose Ilaprazole/Amoxicillin as First-Line Regimen for Helicobacter pylori Infection in Korea

Objective. The eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) following standard triple therapy has declined over the past few decades. This study has determined whether high dose dual therapy (PPI and amoxicillin) is adequate for eradicating H. pylori in Korea. Methods. This was an open-labeled study of H. pylori infected treatment-naive patients. Subjects received dual therapy for 14 days: ilaprazole 40 mg tablets given twice a day and amoxicillin 750 mg tablets given 4 times a day. At the end of the therapy, the subjects visited the clinic to confirm compliance and monitor for any side effects. Subjects visited again after 4–6 weeks to confirm H. pylori status through a urea breath test. Results. The cure rate of H. pylori was 79.3% (23 of 29) (95% confidence interval: 61.6–90.2) in the intention-to-treat analysis and 82.1% (23 of 28) in the per-protocol analysis. Compliance rates were high (96.6%) and side effects were minimal and tolerable. Conclusion. A high dose of ilaprazole + amoxicillin was ineffective as the first-line therapy for eradicating H. pylori in Korea. Future studies should focus on intragastric pH measurements and assess amoxicillin resistance.

Non-pharmacological treatment of Helicobacter pylori

Many food and plant extracts have shown in vitro anti-Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) activity, but are less effective in vivo. The anti-H. pylori effects of these extracts are mainly permeabilitization of the membrane, anti-adhesion, inhibition of bacterial enzymes and bacterial grown. We, herein, review treatment effects of cranberry, garlic, curcumin, ginger and pistacia gum against H. pylori in both in vitro, animal studies and in vivo studies.

Synonymous and nonsynonymous distances help untangle convergent evolution and recombination

When estimating a phylogeny from a multiple sequence alignment, researchers often assume the absence of recombination. However, if recombination is present, then tree estimation and all downstream analyses will be impacted, because different segments of the sequence alignment support different phylogenies. Similarly, convergent selective pressures at the molecular level can also lead to phylogenetic tree incongruence across the sequence alignment. Current methods for detection of phylogenetic incongruence are not equipped to distinguish between these two different mechanisms and assume that the incongruence is a result of recombination or other horizontal transfer of genetic information. We propose a new recombination detection method that can make this distinction, based on synonymous codon substitution distances. Although some power is lost by discarding the information contained in the nonsynonymous substitutions, our new method has lower false positive probabilities than the comparable recombination detection method when the phylogenetic incongruence signal is due to convergent evolution. We apply our method to three empirical examples, where we analyze: (1) sequences from a transmission network of the human immunodeficiency virus, (2) tlpB gene sequences from a geographically diverse set of 38 Helicobacter pylori strains, and (3) hepatitis C virus sequences sampled longitudinally from one patient.

Novel anti-Helicobacter pylori therapies

Helicobacter pylori is a ubiquitous gastropathogen infecting more than half of the world population. It is associated with dyspepsia, gastritis, gastroduodenal ulcers, mucus-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma and gastric carcinoma. Current recommended therapy does not eradicate infection in all treated cases and at least 20% post-treatment patients continue to suffer. Salvage therapy helps some of these nonresponders, but resistance to available antibiotics is mounting. Hence, its treatment still remains a daunting task for the practicing physician. Novel medications with improved efficacy and tolerability and with less chances of resistance are required. The present review attempts to discuss the newer patents in this field, which demonstrate a promising future role in the management of H. pylori infection and its consequent problems.

A Triple and Quadruple Therapy with Doxycycline and Bismuth for First-Line Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Tetracycline-containing triple therapy has been suggested as an alternative first-line therapy for H. pylori infection.

AIM

To evaluate the effect of two dosages of doxycycline (DOX) associated with amoxicillin and esomeprazole with and without bismuth subcitrate as first-line treatment of H. pylori infection.

METHODS

Helicobacter pylori-positive patients underwent a 10-day therapy randomized into four groups: Group A received esomeprazole, amoxicillin, and DOX-100 mg b.i.d. (EAD-100), Group B a quadruple therapy with esomeprazole, amoxicillin, DOX-100 mg b.i.d. and bismuth subcitrate (EADB-100), Group C a triple therapy with esomeprazole, amoxicillin, and DOX-200 mg b.i.d. (EAD-200) and Group D a quadruple therapy with esomeprazole, amoxicillin, DOX-200 mg b.i.d., and bismuth subcitrate (EADB-200). Success was accessed by (13)C urea breath test 2 months after the end of treatment. The number of patients to be recruited for each group had to be at least 50 subjects. Treatment success of 80% or less was considered unacceptable. Stopping rules therefore were anytime six failures had occurred.

RESULTS

In the EAD-100 group and in EAD-200 group, the recruitment was stopped at the 14th and 15th patient, respectively. Fifty-two patients entered in the EADB-100 group and 51 in the EADB-200 group. Intention to treat eradication was in EADB-100 group 46/52 (88.5%, 95% CI 76.6-95.6); in the EADB-200 group 47/51 (92.1%, 95% CI: 81.1-97.8) (n.s.). Side effects were absent.

CONCLUSION

The adjunction of bismuth subcitrate to a triple therapy that includes esomeprazole, amoxicillin, and DOX in patients who are treated for the first time for the H. pylori infection potentiates the therapeutic effect. This regimen, however, deserves to be optimized in terms of duration and dose of DOX.

How to Effectively Use Bismuth Quadruple Therapy: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

Bismuth triple therapy was the first effective Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy. The addition of a proton pump inhibitor helped overcome metronidazole resistance. Its primary indication is penicillin allergy or when clarithromycin and metronidazole resistance are both common. Resistance to the primary first-line therapy have centered on complexity and difficulties with compliance. Understanding regional differences in effectiveness remains unexplained because of the lack of studies including susceptibility testing and adherence data. We discuss regimen variations including substitutions of doxycycline, amoxicillin, and twice a day therapy and provide suggestions regarding what is needed to rationally and effectively use bismuth quadruple therapy.

Improved eradication rate of standard triple therapy by adding bismuth and probiotic supplement for Helicobacter pylori treatment in Thailand

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) remains an important cause of gastric cancer and peptic ulcer disease worldwide. Treatment of H. pylori infection is one of the effective ways to prevent gastric cancer. However, standard triple therapy for H. pylori eradication is no longer effective in many countries, including Thailand. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of adding bismuth and probiotic to standard triple therapy for H. pylori eradication.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective single center study, H. pylori infected gastritis patients were randomized to receive 7- or 14-day standard triple therapy plus bismuth with probiotic or placebo. Treatment regimen consisted of 30 mg lansoprazole twice daily, 1 g amoxicillin twice daily, 1 g clarithromycin MR once daily and 1,048 mg bismuth subsalicylate twice daily. Probiotic bacteria composed of Bifidobacterium lactis, Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus paracasei. Placebo was conventional drinking yogurt without probiotic. CYP2C19 genotyping and antibiotic susceptibility tests were also done. H pylori eradication was defined as a negative 13C-urea breath test at least 2 weeks after completion of treatment.

RESULTS

One hundred subjects were enrolled (25 each to 7- and 14-day regimens with probiotic or placebo). Antibiotic susceptibility tests showed 36.7% metronidazole and 1.1% clarithromycin resistance. CYP2C19 genotyping revealed 40.8%, 49% and 10.2% were rapid, intermediate and poor metabolizers, respectively. The eradication rates of 7- or 14 regimens with probiotics were 100%. Regarding adverse events, the incidence of bitter taste was significantly lower in the 7- day regimen with the probiotic group compared with 7- day regimen with placebo (40% vs. 64%; p=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The 7-day standard triple therapy plus bismuth and probiotic can provide an excellent cure rate of H. pylori (100%) in areas with low clarithromycin resistance such as Thailand, regardless of CYP2C19 genotype. Adding a probiotic also reduced treatment-related adverse events.

Beyond Maastricht IV: are standard empiric triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori still useful in a South-European country?

Background

Empiric triple treatments for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) are increasingly unsuccessful. We evaluated factors associated with failure of these treatments in the central region of Portugal.

Methods

This single-center, prospective study included 154 patients with positive ¹³C-urea breath test (UBT). Patients with no previous H. pylori treatments (Group A, n = 103) received pantoprazole 40 mg 2×/day, amoxicillin 1000 mg 12/12 h and clarithromycin (CLARI) 500 mg 12/12 h, for 14 days. Patients with previous failed treatments (Group B, n = 51) and no history of levofloxacin (LVX) consumption were prescribed pantoprazole 40 mg 2×/day, amoxicillin 1000 mg 12/12 h and LVX 250 mg 12/12 h, for 10 days. H. pylori eradication was assessed by UBT 6–10 weeks after treatment. Compliance and adverse events were assessed by verbal and written questionnaires. Risk factors for eradication failure were determined by multivariate analysis.

Results

Intention-to-treat and per-protocol eradication rates were Group A: 68.9% (95% CI: 59.4–77.1%) and 68.8% (95% CI: 58.9–77.2%); Group B: 52.9% (95% CI: 39.5–66%) and 55.1% (95% CI: 41.3–68.2%), with 43.7% of Group A and 31.4% of Group B reporting adverse events. Main risk factors for failure were H. pylori resistance to CLARI and LVX in Groups A and B, respectively. Another independent risk factor in Group A was history of frequent infections (OR = 4.24; 95% CI 1.04–17.24). For patients with no H. pylori resistance to CLARI, a history of frequent infections (OR = 4.76; 95% CI 1.24–18.27) and active tobacco consumption (OR = 5.25; 95% CI 1.22–22.69) were also associated with eradication failure.

Conclusions

Empiric first and second-line triple treatments have unacceptable eradication rates in the central region of Portugal and cannot be used, according to Maastricht recommendations. Even for cases with no H. pylori resistance to the used antibiotics, results were unacceptable and, at least for CLARI, are influenced by history of frequent infections and tobacco consumption.

Improved allele-specific PCR assays for detection of clarithromycin and fluoroquinolone resistant of Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsies: identification of N87I mutation in GyrA

Molecular testing can rapidly detect Helicobacter pylori susceptibility using gastric biopsies. Allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (ASP-PCR) was used to identify H. pylori 23S rRNA and gyrA mutation using gastric biopsies from Colombian patients and confirmed by PCR and sequencing of the 23S rRNA and gyrA genes. The sensitivity and specificity of ASP-PCR were compared with susceptibilities measured by agar dilution. Samples included gastric biopsies from 107 biopsies with H. pylori infections and 20 H. pylori negative. The sensitivity and specificity of ASP-PCR for the 23S rRNA gene were both 100%. The sensitivity and specificity of ASP-PCR for the gyrA gene, published in 2007 by Nishizawa et al., were 52% and 92.7%, respectively; the lower sensitivity was due to the presence of mutation N87I in our samples, which were not detected by the test. In this study, we designed new primers to detect the mutation N87I in GyrA. The ASP-PCR was performed with the original primers plus the new primers. The molecular test with the new primers improved the sensitivity to 100%. In conclusion, ASP-PCR provides a specific and rapid means of predicting resistance to clarithromycin and levofloxacin in gastric biopsies.

High-dose extended-release lansoprazole (dexlansoprazole) and amoxicillin dual therapy for Helicobacter pylori infections

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori infections have become increasingly difficult to treat.

AIM

To examine whether amoxicillin and high-dose dexlansoprazole would reliably achieve an H. pylori eradication rate of ≥90%.

METHODS

An open-label prospective pilot study of H. pylori eradication in treatment-naïve subjects with active H. pylori infection (positive by two tests).

THERAPY

amoxicillin 1 g and dexlansoprazole 120 mg each twice a day at approximately 12-hour intervals for 14 days. Success was accessed by urea breath test. An effective therapy was defined as a per-protocol treatment success of 90% or greater; treatment success of 80% or less was prespecified as an unacceptable result.

RESULTS

After 13 subjects were entered (12 men, one woman; average age of 54 years), the prespecified stopping rule of six treatment failures was achieved (i.e., the 95% confidence interval excluded achieving the required 90% success rate even if the proposed study of 50 completed patients were entered) and enrollment was stopped. Per-protocol and intention-to-treat treatment success were both 53.8%; (7/13); 95% CI = 25-80%. Compliance was 100%. Three patients (23%) reported side effects, all of which were mild and none interrupted therapy.

CONCLUSION

Theoretically, dual PPI plus amoxicillin should reliably eradicate H. pylori provided nearly neutral intragastric pH can be maintained. Clearly, dexlansoprazole, despite being administered at high dose and twice a day (i.e., total daily dose 240 mg), failed to achieve an intragastric milieu consistent with dual PPI plus amoxicillin therapy being an effective anti-H. pylori regimen.

Triple therapy with high-dose proton-pump inhibitor, amoxicillin, and doxycycline is useless for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a proof-of-concept study

INTRODUCTION

Helicobacter pylori resistance to antibiotics is steadily increasing and multidrug-resistant strains are common and difficult to eliminate, mainly in countries where bismuth, tetracycline, furazolidone, and rifabutin are unavailable.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a triple therapy with proton-pump inhibitor (PPI), amoxicillin, and doxycycline in patients with multidrug-resistant H. pylori.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective study involved 16 patients (13 females; mean age - 50 ± 11.3 years) infected by H. pylori with known resistance to clarithromycin, metronidazole, and levofloxacin, but susceptibility to amoxicillin and tetracycline. All patients were previously submitted to upper endoscopy with gastric biopsies for H. pylori culture and susceptibility testing by Etest. Mutations in 23S rRNA and gyrA genes were determined by real-time PCR. A 10-day eradication regimen with PPI (double-standard dose b.i.d.), amoxicillin (1000 mg b.i.d.), and doxycycline (100 mg b.i.d.) was prescribed after pretreatment with PPI during 3 days. Eradication success was assessed by (13) C-urea breath test 6-10 weeks after treatment. Compliance and adverse events were determined through phone contact immediately after treatment and specific written questionnaires.

RESULTS

Only one patient did not complete treatment due to adverse events. Another four patients experienced mild side effects not affecting compliance. The control (13) C-urea breath test was positive in all patients. Per-protocol and intention-to-treat eradication rates were 0%.

CONCLUSIONS

Although safe, a triple-therapy protocol with high-dose PPI, amoxicillin, and doxycycline is useless for multidrug-resistant H. pylori eradication.

Rational Helicobacter pylori therapy: evidence-based medicine rather than medicine-based evidence

Data are available such that choice of Helicobacter pylori therapy for an individual patient can be reliably predicted. Here, treatment success is defined as a cure rate of 90% or greater. Treatment outcome in a population or a patient can be calculated based on the effectiveness of a regimen for infections with susceptible and with resistant strains coupled with the knowledge of the prevalence of resistance (ie, based on formal measurement, clinical experience, or both). We provide the formula for predicting outcome and we illustrate the calculations. Because clarithromycin-containing triple therapy and 10-day sequential therapy are now only effective in special populations, they are considered obsolete; neither should continue to be used as empiric therapies (ie, 7- and 14-day triple therapies fail when clarithromycin resistance exceeds 5% and 15%, respectively, and 10-day sequential therapy fails when metronidazole resistance exceeds 20%). Therapy should be individualized based on prior history and whether the patient is in a high-risk group for resistance. The preferred choices for Western countries are 14-day concomitant therapy, 14-day bismuth quadruple therapy, and 14-day hybrid sequential-concomitant therapy. We also provide details regarding the successful use of fluoroquinolone-, rifabutin-, and furazolidone-containing therapies. Finally, we provide recommendations for the efficient development (ie, identification and optimization) of new regimens, as well as how to prevent or minimize failures. The trial-and-error approach for identifying and testing regimens frequently resulted in poor treatment success. The described approach allows outcome to be predicted and should simplify treatment and drug development.