1
|
Steinbrück I, Ebigbo A, Kuellmer A, Schmidt A, Kouladouros K, Brand M, Koenen T, Rempel V, Wannhoff A, Faiss S, Pech O, Möschler O, Dumoulin FL, Kirstein MM, von Hahn T, Allescher HD, Gölder SK, Götz M, Hollerbach S, Lewerenz B, Meining A, Messmann H, Rösch T, Allgaier HP. Cold Versus Hot Snare Endoscopic Resection of Large Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps: Randomized Controlled German CHRONICLE Trial. Gastroenterology 2024; 167:764-777. [PMID: 38795735 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Revised: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 05/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is standard therapy for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps ≥20 mm. It has been suggested recently that polyp resection without current (cold resection) may be superior to the standard technique using cutting/coagulation current (hot resection) by reducing adverse events (AEs), but evidence from a randomized trial is missing. METHODS In this randomized controlled multicentric trial involving 19 centers, nonpedunculated colorectal polyps ≥20 mm were randomly assigned to cold or hot EMR. The primary outcome was major AE (eg, perforation or postendoscopic bleeding). Among secondary outcomes, major AE subcategories, postpolypectomy syndrome, and residual adenoma were most relevant. RESULTS Between 2021 and 2023, there were 396 polyps in 363 patients (48.2% were female) enrolled for the intention-to-treat analysis. Major AEs occurred in 1.0% of the cold group and in 7.9% of the hot group (P = .001; odds ratio [OR], 0.12; 95% CI, 0.03-0.54). Rates for perforation and postendoscopic bleeding were significantly lower in the cold group, with 0% vs 3.9% (P = .007) and 1.0% vs 4.4% (P = .040). Postpolypectomy syndrome occurred with similar frequency (3.1% vs 4.4%; P = .490). After cold resection, residual adenoma was found more frequently, with 23.7% vs 13.8% (P = .020; OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.12-3.38). In multivariable analysis, lesion diameter of ≥4 cm was an independent predictor both for major AEs (OR, 3.37) and residual adenoma (OR, 2.47) and high-grade dysplasia/cancer for residual adenoma (OR, 2.92). CONCLUSIONS Cold resection of large, nonpedunculated colorectal polyps appears to be considerably safer than hot EMR; however, at the cost of a higher residual adenoma rate. Further studies have to confirm to what extent polyp size and histology can determine an individualized approach. German Clinical Trials Registry (Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien), Number DRKS00025170.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingo Steinbrück
- Department of Medicine and Gastroenterology, Evangelisches Diakoniekrankenhaus Freiburg, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Alanna Ebigbo
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Armin Kuellmer
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Arthur Schmidt
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany; Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Tübingen, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Konstantinos Kouladouros
- Central Interdisciplinary Endoscopy Department, Mannheim University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Markus Brand
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Teresa Koenen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rhein-Maas-Klinikum Würselen, Academic Teaching Hospital Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Würselen, Germany
| | - Viktor Rempel
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Anna Hospital Herne, Academic Teaching Hospital Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Andreas Wannhoff
- Department of Gastroenterology, Regionale Kliniken Holding und Services GmbH (RKH) Klinikum Ludwigsburg, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigsburg, Germany
| | - Siegbert Faiss
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sana Klinikum Lichtenberg, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Oliver Pech
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Regensburg and Technical University of Munich, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Oliver Möschler
- Department of Endoscopy and Ultrasound, Marienhospital Osnabrück, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Hannover, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Franz Ludwig Dumoulin
- Department of Medicine and Gastroenterology, Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Bonn, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Martha M Kirstein
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Lübeck, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Thomas von Hahn
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, Academic Teaching Hospital University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hans-Dieter Allescher
- Department of Gastroenterology, Klinikum Garmisch-Patenkirchen, Academic Teaching Hospital, University Munich, Garmisch-Patenkirchen, Germany
| | - Stefan K Gölder
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Ostalb-Klinikum Aalen, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Ulm, Aalen, Germany
| | - Martin Götz
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kliniken Böblingen, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Tübingen, Böblingen, Germany
| | - Stephan Hollerbach
- Department of Gastroenterology, Allgemeines Krankenhaus Celle, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Hannover, Celle, Germany
| | - Björn Lewerenz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Klinikum Traunstein, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Munich, Traunstein, Germany
| | - Alexander Meining
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Helmut Messmann
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Rösch
- Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Allgaier
- Department of Medicine and Gastroenterology, Evangelisches Diakoniekrankenhaus Freiburg, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Niu C, Zhang J, Joshi U, Elkhapery A, Boppana HK, Okolo PI. Efficacy and Safety of Cold Versus Hot Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection in Colorectal Polyp Removal: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2024:00004836-990000000-00338. [PMID: 39145841 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000002059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection (C-EMR) is hypothesized to offer a safety advantage over hot snare endoscopic mucosal resection (H-EMR). The primary objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of C-EMR versus H-EMR for the management of colorectal lesions. METHODS A meta-analysis was performed to determine pooled odds ratios (ORs) for comparing outcomes between the C-EMR and H-EMR groups. RESULTS The pooled OR for complete resection rates were estimated at 0.70 (95% CI: 0.36-1.36, P =0.29) and en bloc rates were 0.24 (95% CI: 0.05-1.08, P=0.06) between C-EMR group and H-EMR group. The overall complete resection rate for C-EMR was 84%, and the en bloc resection rate was 57. Notably, C-EMR was associated with a significantly lower incidence of delayed bleeding. The recurrence rate of polyps was very low (2%) when treating sessile serrated polyp (SSP) lesions, but higher (23%) for non-SSP lesions. Subgroup analysis revealed minimal recurrence of polyps after using C-EMR for lesions between 10 to 20 mm and ≥20 mm. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis suggests that C-EMR could be a safer and equally effective alternative to H-EMR for resecting colorectal lesions. We recommend C-EMR as the preferred method for excising large colorectal lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chengu Niu
- Internal Medicine Residency Program, Rochester General Hospital
| | - Jing Zhang
- Rainier Springs Behavioral Health Hospital, Vancouver, WA
| | - Utsav Joshi
- Internal Medicine Residency Program, Rochester General Hospital
| | - Ahmed Elkhapery
- Internal Medicine Residency Program, Rochester General Hospital
| | | | - Patrick I Okolo
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, NY
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ramai D, Clement B, Maida M, Previtera M, Brooks OW, Wang Y, Chandan S, Dhindsa B, Deliwala S, Facciorusso A, Khashab M, Ofosu A. Cold Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (c-EMR) of Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps ≥20 mm: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2024; 58:661-667. [PMID: 38227846 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is increasing evidence that cold endoscopic mucosal resection (c-EMR) can effectively treat large colorectal polyps. We aim to appraise the current literature and evaluate outcomes following c-EMR for nonpedunculated colonic polyps ≥20 mm. METHODS Major databases were searched. Primary outcomes included recurrence rate and adverse events. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. RESULTS Nine articles were included in the final analysis, which included 817 patients and 1077 colorectal polyps. Average polyp size was 28.8 (±5.1) mm. The pooled recurrence rate of polyps of any histology at 4 to 6 months was 21.0% (95% CI: 9.0%-32.0%, P <0.001, I2 =97.3, P <0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that recurrence was 10% for proximal lesions (95% CI: 0.0%-20.0%, P =0.054, I2 =93.7%, P =0.054) and 9% for distal lesions (95% CI: 2.0%-21.0%, P =0.114, I2 =95.8%, P =0.114). Furthermore, subgroup analysis showed that recurrence was 12% for adenoma (95% CI: 4.0%-19.0%, P =0.003, I2 =98.0%, P =0.003), and 3% for sessile serrated polyps (95% CI: 1.0%-5.0%, P =0.002, I2 =34.4%, P =0.002). Post-polypectomy bleeding occurred in 1% (n=8/817) of patients, whereas abdominal pain occurred in 0.2% (n=2/817) of patients. CONCLUSIONS C-EMR for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps ≥20 mm shows an excellent safety profile with a very low rate of delayed bleeding as well as significantly less recurrence for sessile serrated polyps than adenomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daryl Ramai
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, S. Elia Hospital, Caltanissetta, Italy
| | | | - Marcello Maida
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, S. Elia-Raimondi Hospital, Caltanissetta
| | - Melissa Previtera
- University of Cincinnati Libraries, Donald C. Harrison Health Sciences Library, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Olivia W Brooks
- Internal Medicine Residency, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT
| | - Yichen Wang
- Mercy Internal Medicine Service, Trinity Health of New England, Springfield, MA
| | - Saurabh Chandan
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, CHI Health Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Banreet Dhindsa
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Smit Deliwala
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Mouen Khashab
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Andrew Ofosu
- Faculty of Medicine, "Kore" University of Enna, Enna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
O’Sullivan T, Bourke MJ. Endoscopic Resection of Neoplasia in the Lower GI Tract: A Clinical Algorithm. Visc Med 2024; 40:217-227. [PMID: 39157731 PMCID: PMC11326768 DOI: 10.1159/000539219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 08/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer is a highly prevalent malignancy and a significant driver of cancer mortality and health-related expenditure worldwide. Polyp removal reduces the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer. In 2024, endoscopists have an array of resection modalities at their disposal. Each technique requires a unique skillset and has individual advantages and limitations. Consequently, resection in the colorectum requires an evidence-based algorithm approach that considers these factors. Summary A literature review of endoscopic resection for colonic neoplasia was conducted. Best supporting scientific evidence was summarized for the endoscopic resection of diminutive polyps, large ≥20 mm lesions and polyps containing invasive cancer. Factors including resection modality, complications and lesion selection were explored to inform an algorithm approach to colorectal resection. Key Messages Endoscopic resection in the colorectum is not a one-size-fits-all approach. Detailed understanding of polyp size, location, morphology and predicted histology are critical factors that inform appropriate endoscopic resection practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy O’Sullivan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- University of Sydney, Westmead Clinical School, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael J. Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- University of Sydney, Westmead Clinical School, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
O'Sullivan T, Cronin O, van Hattem WA, Mandarino FV, Gauci JL, Kerrison C, Whitfield A, Gupta S, Lee E, Williams SJ, Burgess N, Bourke MJ. Cold versus hot snare endoscopic mucosal resection for large (≥15 mm) flat non-pedunculated colorectal polyps: a randomised controlled trial. Gut 2024:gutjnl-2024-332807. [PMID: 38964854 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2024-332807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2024] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Conventional hot snare endoscopic mucosal resection (H-EMR) is effective for the management of large (≥20 mm) non-pedunculated colon polyps (LNPCPs) however, electrocautery-related complications may incur significant morbidity. With a superior safety profile, cold snare EMR (C-EMR) of LNPCPs is an attractive alternative however evidence is lacking. We conducted a randomised trial to compare the efficacy and safety of C-EMR to H-EMR. METHODS Flat, 15-50 mm adenomatous LNPCPs were prospectively enrolled and randomly assigned to C-EMR or H-EMR with margin thermal ablation at a single tertiary centre. The primary outcome was endoscopically visible and/or histologically confirmed recurrence at 6 months surveillance colonoscopy. Secondary outcomes were clinically significant post-EMR bleeding (CSPEB), delayed perforation and technical success. RESULTS 177 LNPCPs in 177 patients were randomised to C-EMR arm (n=87) or H-EMR (n=90). Treatment groups were equivalent for technical success 86/87 (98.9%) C-EMR versus H-EMR 90/90 (100%); p=0.31. Recurrence was significantly greater in C-EMR (16/87, 18.4% vs 1/90, 1.1%; relative risk (RR) 16.6, 95% CI 2.24 to 122; p<0.001).Delayed perforation (1/90 (1.1%) vs 0; p=0.32) only occurred in the H-EMR group. CSPEB was significantly greater in the H-EMR arm (7/90 (7.8%) vs 1/87 (1.1%); RR 6.77, 95% CI 0.85 to 53.9; p=0.034). CONCLUSION Compared with H-EMR, C-EMR for flat, adenomatous LNPCPs, demonstrates superior safety with equivalent technical success. However, endoscopic recurrence is significantly greater for cold snare resection and is currently a limitation of the technique. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04138030.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy O'Sullivan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Oliver Cronin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - W Arnout van Hattem
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Vito Mandarino
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Julia L Gauci
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Clarence Kerrison
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anthony Whitfield
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sunil Gupta
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Eric Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stephen J Williams
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicholas Burgess
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhang QQ, Wu JD, Li XY, Fang FF, Li GP, Bai T, Song J. Clinical and endoscopic characteristics of colorectal sessile serrated lesions with or without dysplasia/carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dig Dis 2024; 25:424-435. [PMID: 39104049 DOI: 10.1111/1751-2980.13302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2024] [Revised: 06/05/2024] [Accepted: 06/29/2024] [Indexed: 08/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to compare the clinical and endoscopic characteristics of sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) with dysplasia/carcinoma (SSLD/Cs) and SSLs without dysplasia in this systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched for relevant studies published up to August 28, 2023. The primary outcome was lesion size in SSLD/Cs and SSLs without dysplasia. The secondary outcomes included risk of dysplasia/carcinoma, morphology (classified based on the Paris classification), and lesion features such as mucus cap and nodules/protrusions in the two groups. RESULTS Thirteen studies with 14 381 patients were included. The proportion of SSLD/Cs ≥10 mm was significantly higher than that of SSLs without dysplasia (odds ratio [OR] 3.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21-12.02, p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in the risk of dysplasia/carcinoma between the proximal (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.57-1.14) and distal colon (OR 1.25, 95% CI 0.88-1.77, p = 0.21). The 0-Ip (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.50-4.09) and 0-IIa + Is (OR 10.38, 95% CI 3.08-34.98) morphologies were more prevalent among SSLD/Cs, whereas the 0-IIa morphology (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.22-0.65) was more prevalent among SSLs without dysplasia (all p < 0.001). Furthermore, mucus cap (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.42-0.89, p = 0.01) was more common among SSLs without dysplasia, whereas nodules/protrusions (OR 7.80, 95% CI 3.07-19.85, p < 0.001) were more common in SSLD/Cs. CONCLUSION SSLs >10 mm, 0-Ip or 0-IIa + Is morphologies, and those with nodules/protrusions are significantly associated with dysplasia/carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qing Qing Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
| | - Jian Di Wu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
| | - Xue Yan Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
| | - Fei Fei Fang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
| | - Gang Ping Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
| | - Tao Bai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
| | - Jun Song
- Department of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ferlitsch M, Hassan C, Bisschops R, Bhandari P, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Risio M, Paspatis GA, Moss A, Libânio D, Lorenzo-Zúñiga V, Voiosu AM, Rutter MD, Pellisé M, Moons LMG, Probst A, Awadie H, Amato A, Takeuchi Y, Repici A, Rahmi G, Koecklin HU, Albéniz E, Rockenbauer LM, Waldmann E, Messmann H, Triantafyllou K, Jover R, Gralnek IM, Dekker E, Bourke MJ. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2024. Endoscopy 2024; 56:516-545. [PMID: 38670139 DOI: 10.1055/a-2304-3219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
1: ESGE recommends cold snare polypectomy (CSP), to include a clear margin of normal tissue (1-2 mm) surrounding the polyp, for the removal of diminutive polyps (≤ 5 mm).Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 2: ESGE recommends against the use of cold biopsy forceps excision because of its high rate of incomplete resection.Strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence. 3: ESGE recommends CSP, to include a clear margin of normal tissue (1-2 mm) surrounding the polyp, for the removal of small polyps (6-9 mm).Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 4: ESGE recommends hot snare polypectomy for the removal of nonpedunculated adenomatous polyps of 10-19 mm in size.Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 5: ESGE recommends conventional (diathermy-based) endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for large (≥ 20 mm) nonpedunculated adenomatous polyps (LNPCPs).Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 6: ESGE suggests that underwater EMR can be considered an alternative to conventional hot EMR for the treatment of adenomatous LNPCPs.Weak recommendation, moderate quality of evidence. 7: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) may also be suggested as an alternative for removal of LNPCPs of ≥ 20 mm in selected cases and in high-volume centers.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 8: ESGE recommends that, after piecemeal EMR of LNPCPs by hot snare, the resection margins should be treated by thermal ablation using snare-tip soft coagulation to prevent adenoma recurrence.Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 9: ESGE recommends (piecemeal) cold snare polypectomy or cold EMR for SSLs of all sizes without suspected dysplasia.Strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence. 10: ESGE recommends prophylactic endoscopic clip closure of the mucosal defect after EMR of LNPCPs in the right colon to reduce to reduce the risk of delayed bleeding.Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 11: ESGE recommends that en bloc resection techniques, such as en bloc EMR, ESD, endoscopic intermuscular dissection, endoscopic full-thickness resection, or surgery should be the techniques of choice in cases with suspected superficial invasive carcinoma, which otherwise cannot be removed en bloc by standard polypectomy or EMR.Strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Ferlitsch
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Gastroenterology, Evangelical Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Raf Bisschops
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, TARGID, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pradeep Bhandari
- Endoscopy Department, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Mário Dinis-Ribeiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- MEDCIDS/Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center (Porto.CCC) and RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Porto, Portugal
| | - Mauro Risio
- Department of Pathology, Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | - Gregorios A Paspatis
- Gastroenterology Department, Venizeleio General Hospital, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - Alan Moss
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western Health, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Western Health, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Diogo Libânio
- Department of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- MEDCIDS/Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center (Porto.CCC) and RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Porto, Portugal
| | - Vincente Lorenzo-Zúñiga
- Endoscopy Unit, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital / IISLaFe, Valencia, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Catholic University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Andrei M Voiosu
- Gastroenterology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
- Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Matthew D Rutter
- Department of Gastroenterology, North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust, Stockton-on-Tees, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Maria Pellisé
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Leon M G Moons
- III Medizinische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Probst
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Halim Awadie
- Ellen and Pinchas Mamber Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
| | - Arnaldo Amato
- Digestive Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Department, Ospedale A. Manzoni, Lecco, Italy
| | - Yoji Takeuchi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Gabriel Rahmi
- Hepatogastroenterology and Endoscopy Department, Hôpital européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
- Laboratoire de Recherches Biochirurgicales, APHP-Centre Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Hugo U Koecklin
- Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
- Teknon Medical Center, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eduardo Albéniz
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN); Navarrabiomed, Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA), IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Lisa-Maria Rockenbauer
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Elisabeth Waldmann
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Helmut Messmann
- III Medizinische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodastrian University of Athens, Attikon University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Rodrigo Jover
- Servicio de Medicina Digestiva, Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria ISABIAL, Departamento de Medicina Clínica, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain
| | - Ian M Gralnek
- Ellen and Pinchas Mamber Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
- Rappaport Faculty of Medicine Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Muñoz Taboada G, Dahis D, Dosta P, Edelman E, Artzi N. Sprayable Hydrogel Sealant for Gastrointestinal Wound Shielding. ADVANCED MATERIALS (DEERFIELD BEACH, FLA.) 2024; 36:e2311798. [PMID: 38421085 DOI: 10.1002/adma.202311798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
Naturally occurring internal bleeding, such as in stomach ulcers, and complications following interventions, such as polyp resection post-colonoscopy, may result in delayed (5-7 days) post-operative adverse events-such as bleeding, intestinal wall perforation, and leakage. Current solutions for controlling intra- and post-procedural complications are limited in effectiveness. Hemostatic powders only provide a temporary solution due to their short-term adhesion to GI mucosal tissues (less than 48 h). In this study, a sprayable adhesive hydrogel for facile application and sustained adhesion to GI lesions is developed using clinically available endoscopes. Upon spraying, the biomaterial (based on polyethyleneimine-modified Pluronic micelles precursor and oxidized dextran) instantly gels upon contact with the tissue, forming an adhesive shield. In vitro and in vivo studies in guinea pigs, rabbits, and pig models confirm the safety and efficacy of this biomaterial in colonic and acidic stomach lesions. The authors' findings highlight that this family of hydrogels ensures prolonged tissue protection (3-7 days), facilitates wound healing, and minimizes the risk of delayed complications. Overall, this technology offers a readily adoptable approach for gastrointestinal wound management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gonzalo Muñoz Taboada
- BioDevek, Boston, MA, 02134, USA
- Institut Químic de Sarrià, Univeritat Ramon Llull, Barcelona, 08017, Spain
| | | | - Pere Dosta
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
- Wyss Institute for Biologically-Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Elazer Edelman
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
| | - Natalie Artzi
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
- Wyss Institute for Biologically-Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ali S, Khetpal N, Fatima M, Hussain S, Ali A, Khan MA, Childs C, Hasan MK. The Safety of Cold Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy in Polyps 10-20 mm: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus 2024; 16:e58462. [PMID: 38765346 PMCID: PMC11100549 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Colonoscopy remains the primary method for preventing colorectal cancer. Traditionally, hot snare polypectomy (HSP) was the method of choice for removing polyps larger than 5 mm. Yet, for polyps smaller than 10 mm, cold snare polypectomy (CSP) has become the favored approach. Lately, the use of CSP has expanded to include the removal of sessile polyps that are between 10 and 20 mm in size. Our systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) compared to hot snare polypectomy (HSP) for resecting polyps measuring 10-20 mm. We searched the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Embase, and Cochrane databases up to April 2020 to find studies that directly compared CSP to HSP for polyps larger than 10 mm. Our main focus was on assessing the risk of delayed bleeding after polypectomy; a secondary focus was the incidence of any adverse events that required medical intervention post procedure. Our search yielded three comparative studies, two observational studies, and one randomized controlled trial (RCT), together encompassing 1,193 polypectomy procedures. Of these, 485 were performed using CSP and 708 with HSP. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB) was 0.36 (95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.02, 7.13), with a Cochran Q test P-value of 0.11 and an I2 of 53%. For the risk of any adverse events necessitating medical care, the pooled OR was 0.15 (95% CI: 0.01, 2.29), with a Cochran Q test P-value of 0.21 and an I2 of 35%. The quality of the two observational studies was deemed moderate, and the RCT was only available in abstract form, preventing quality assessment. Our analysis suggests that there is no significant difference in the incidence of delayed post-polypectomy bleeding or other adverse events requiring medical attention between CSP and HSP for polyps measuring 10-20 mm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saeed Ali
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, USA
| | - Neelam Khetpal
- Department of Hospital Medicine, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, USA
| | - Munazza Fatima
- Department of Anesthesiology, State University of New York (SUNY) Upstate Medical University Hospital, Syracuse, USA
| | - Sana Hussain
- Department of Medicine, Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar, PAK
| | - Asad Ali
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, State University of New York (SUNY) Upstate Medical University Hospital, Syracuse, USA
| | - Muhammad Ali Khan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Christopher Childs
- Hardin Library for the Health Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA
| | - Muhammad K Hasan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ding C, Yang JF, Wang X, Zhou YF, Khizar H, Jin Z, Zhang XF. Cold EMR vs. Hot EMR for the removal of sessile serrated polyps larger than 10 mm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Surg 2024; 24:93. [PMID: 38509508 PMCID: PMC10953062 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-024-02325-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) appears to be a promising technique for the removal of sessile serrated polyps (SSPs) ≥ 10 mm. To assess the effectiveness and safety of EMR for removing SSPs ≥ 10 mm, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS We conducted a thorough search of Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases for relevant studies reporting on EMR of SSPs ≥ 10 mm, up until December 2023. Our primary endpoints of interest were rates of technical success, residual SSPs, and adverse events (AE). RESULTS Our search identified 426 articles, of which 14 studies with 2262 SSPs were included for analysis. The rates of technical success, AEs, and residual SSPs were 100%, 2.0%, and 3.1%, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that the technical success rates were the same for polyps 10-19 and 20 mm, and en-bloc and piecemeal resection. Residual SSPs rates were similar in en-bloc and piecemeal resection, but much lower in cold EMR (1.0% vs. 4.2%, P = 0.034). AEs rates were reduced in cold EMR compared to hot EMR (0% vs. 2.9%, P = 0.168), in polyps 10-19 mm compared to 20 mm (0% vs. 4.1%, P = 0.255), and in piecemeal resection compared to en-bloc (0% vs. 0.7%, P = 0.169). CONCLUSIONS EMR is an effective and safe technique for removing SSPs ≥ 10 mm. The therapeutic effect of cold EMR is superior to that of hot EMR, with a lower incidence of adverse effects. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42023388959.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cong Ding
- Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
- Key Laboratory of Clinical Cancer Pharmacology and Toxicology Research of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Jian-Feng Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
- Key Laboratory of Clinical Cancer Pharmacology and Toxicology Research of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Xia Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
- Key Laboratory of Clinical Cancer Pharmacology and Toxicology Research of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Yi-Feng Zhou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
- Key Laboratory of Clinical Cancer Pharmacology and Toxicology Research of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Hayat Khizar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
- Key Laboratory of Clinical Cancer Pharmacology and Toxicology Research of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Zheng Jin
- Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
- Key Laboratory of Clinical Cancer Pharmacology and Toxicology Research of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Xiao-Feng Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
- Key Laboratory of Clinical Cancer Pharmacology and Toxicology Research of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Alali AA, Almadi MA, Barkun AN. Review article: Advances in the management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2024; 59:632-644. [PMID: 38158721 DOI: 10.1111/apt.17859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 10/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) is a common emergency with substantial associated morbidity and mortality. Elective colonoscopy plays an essential role in management, with an even more important role for radiology in the acute setting. Recent advances in the management of patients with LGIB warrant review as the management has recently evolved. AIMS To provide a comprehensive and updated overview of advances in the approach to patients with LGIB METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature search to examine the current data for this narrative review supplemented by expert opinion. RESULTS The incidence of LGIB is increasing worldwide, partly related to an ageing population and the increasing use of antithrombotics. Diverticulosis continues to be the most common aetiology of LGIB. Pre-endoscopic risk stratification tools, especially the Oakland score, can aid appropriate patient triage. Adequate resuscitation continues to form the basis of management, while appropriate management of antithrombotics is crucial to balance the risk of worsening bleeding against increased cardiovascular risk. Radiological imaging plays an essential role in the diagnosis and treatment of acute LGIB, especially among unstable patients. Colonoscopy remains the gold-standard test for the elective management of stable patients. CONCLUSIONS The management of LGIB has evolved significantly in recent years, with a shift towards radiological interventions for unstable patients while reserving elective colonoscopy for stable patients. A multidisciplinary approach is essential to optimise the outcomes of patients with LGIB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali A Alali
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Jabriya, Kuwait
| | - Majid A Almadi
- Division of Gastroenterology, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Division of Gastroenterology, The McGill University Health Center, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Alan N Barkun
- Division of Gastroenterology, The McGill University Health Center, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, The McGill University Health Center, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cronin O, Kirszenblat D, Forbes N, Gupta S, Whitfield A, O'Sullivan T, Gauci J, Abuarisha M, Wang H, Burgess NG, Lee EYT, Williams SJ, Bourke MJ. Geometry of cold snare polypectomy and risk of incomplete resection. Endoscopy 2024; 56:214-219. [PMID: 37774737 DOI: 10.1055/a-2184-1609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is safer than and equally efficacious as hot snare polypectomy (HSP) for the removal of small (<10mm) colorectal polyps. The maximum polyp size that can be effectively managed by piecemeal CSP (p-CSP) without an excessive burden of recurrence is unknown. METHODS Resection error risks (RERs), defined as the estimated likelihood of incomplete removal of adenomatous tissue for a single snare resection pass, for CSP and HSP were calculated, based on an incomplete resection rate. Polyp area, snare size, estimated number of resections, and optimal resection defect area were modeled. Overall risk of incomplete resection (RIR) was defined as RIR=1 - (1 - p)n, where p is the RER and n the number of resections. RESULTS A 40-mm polyp has a four times greater area than a 20-mm polyp (314.16mm2 vs. 1256.64mm2), and requires three times more resections (11 vs. 33, respectively, assuming 8-mm piecemeal resection pieces for p-CSP). RIRs for a 40-mm polyp by HSP and p-CSP were 15.1%-23% and 40.74%-60.60% respectively. CONCLUSION RER is more important with p-CSP than with HSP. The number of resections, n, and consequently RIR increases with increasing polyp size. Given the overwhelming safety of CSP, specific techniques to minimize the RER should be studied and developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Cronin
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Medicine, University of Sydney Westmead Clinical School, Sydney, Australia
| | - David Kirszenblat
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | | | - Sunil Gupta
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Medicine, University of Sydney Westmead Clinical School, Sydney, Australia
| | - Anthony Whitfield
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Medicine, University of Sydney Westmead Clinical School, Sydney, Australia
| | - Timothy O'Sullivan
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Medicine, University of Sydney Westmead Clinical School, Sydney, Australia
| | - Julia Gauci
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Medicine, University of Sydney Westmead Clinical School, Sydney, Australia
| | - Muhammad Abuarisha
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Medicine, University of Sydney Westmead Clinical School, Sydney, Australia
| | - Hunter Wang
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Medicine, University of Sydney Westmead Clinical School, Sydney, Australia
| | - Nicholas G Burgess
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Medicine, University of Sydney Westmead Clinical School, Sydney, Australia
| | - Eric Y T Lee
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Medicine, University of Sydney Westmead Clinical School, Sydney, Australia
| | - Stephen J Williams
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Medicine, University of Sydney Westmead Clinical School, Sydney, Australia
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Medicine, University of Sydney Westmead Clinical School, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Albouys J, Montori Pina S, Boukechiche S, Albéniz E, Vidal G, Legros R, Dahan M, Lepetit H, Pioche M, Schaefer M, Geyl S, Carrier P, Loustaud-Ratti V, Valgueblasse V, Brule C, Rodrigues R, Enguita German M, Jacques J. Risk of delayed bleeding after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: the Limoges Bleeding Score. Endoscopy 2024; 56:110-118. [PMID: 37816392 DOI: 10.1055/a-2189-0807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinically significant delayed bleeding (CSDB) is a frequent, and sometimes severe, adverse event after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We evaluated risk factors of CSDB after colorectal ESD. METHODS We analyzed a prospective registry of 940 colorectal ESDs performed from 2013 to 2022. The incidence of bleeding was evaluated up to 30 days. Risk factors for delayed bleeding were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression. A Korean scoring model was tested, and a new risk-scoring model was developed and internally validated. RESULTS CSDB occurred in 75 patients (8.0%). The Korean score performed poorly in our cohort, with a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.567. In the multivariate analysis, risk factors were age ≥75 years (odds ratio [OR] 1.63; 95%CI 0.97-2.73; 1 point), use of antithrombotics (OR 1.72; 95%CI 1.01-2.94; 1 point), rectal location (OR 1.51; 95%CI 0.92-2.48; 1 point), size >50 mm (OR 3.67; 95%CI 2.02-7.14; 3 points), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of III or IV (OR 2.26; 95%CI 1.32-3.92; 2 points). The model showed fair calibration and good discrimination, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.751 (95%CI 0.690-0.812). The score was used to define two groups of patients, those with low-medium risk (0 to 4 points) and high risk (5 to 8 points) for CSDB (respective bleeding rates 4.1% and 17.5%). CONCLUSION A score based on five simple and meaningful variables was predictive of CSDB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jérémie Albouys
- Hépato-gastro-entérology, Hopital Dupuytren, Limoges, France
| | - Sheyla Montori Pina
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Research Unit, Navarrabiomed, Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN), Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA), Pamplona, Spain
- IdiSNA, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | - Eduardo Albéniz
- IdiSNA, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN), Navarrabiomed, Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Guillaume Vidal
- Hépato-gastro-entérologie, Hospital Dupuytren, Limoges, France
| | - Romain Legros
- Hépato-gastro-entérologie, Hospital Dupuytren, Limoges, France
| | - Martin Dahan
- Hépato-gastro-entérologie, Hospital Dupuytren, Limoges, France
| | - Hugo Lepetit
- Hépato-gastro-entérologie, Hospital Dupuytren, Limoges, France
| | | | - Marion Schaefer
- Hépato-gastro-entérology, Nancy University Hospital, Nancy, France
| | - Sophie Geyl
- Hépato-gastro-entérologie, Hospital Dupuytren, Limoges, France
| | - Paul Carrier
- Hépato-gastro-entérologie, Hospital Dupuytren, Limoges, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Monica Enguita German
- Methodology Unit, Navarrabiomed, Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN), Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Jérémie Jacques
- Hépato-gastro-entérologie, Hospital Dupuytren, Limoges, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mohammed A, Gonzaga ER, Hasan MK, Saeed A, Friedland S, Bilal M, Sharma N, Jawaid S, Othman M, Khalaf MA, Hwang JH, Viana A, Singh S, Hayat M, Cosgrove ND, Jain D, Arain MA, Kadkhodayan KS, Yang D. Low delayed bleeding and high complete closure rate of mucosal defects with the novel through-the-scope dual-action tissue clip after endoscopic resection of large nonpedunculated colorectal lesions (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 99:83-90.e1. [PMID: 37481003 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.07.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Complete closure after endoscopic resection of large nonpedunculated colorectal lesions (LNPCLs) can reduce delayed bleeding but is challenging with conventional through-the-scope (TTS) clips alone. The novel dual-action tissue (DAT) clip has clip arms that open and close independently of each other, facilitating tissue approximation. We aimed to evaluate the rate of complete closure and delayed bleeding with the DAT clip after endoscopic resection of LNPCLs. METHODS This was a multicenter prospective cohort study of all patients who underwent defect closure with the DAT clip after EMR or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of LNPCLs ≥20 mm from July 2022 to May 2023. Delayed bleeding was defined as a bleeding event requiring hospitalization, blood transfusion, or any intervention within 30 days after the procedure. Complete closure was defined as apposition of mucosal defect margins without visible submucosal areas <3 mm along the closure line. RESULTS One hundred seven patients (median age, 64 years; 42.5% women) underwent EMR (n = 63) or ESD (n = 44) of LNPCLs (median size, 40 mm; 74.8% right-sided colon) followed by defect closure. Complete closure was achieved in 96.3% (n = 103) with a mean of 1.4 ± .6 DAT clips and 2.9 ± 1.8 TTS clips. Delayed bleeding occurred in 1 patient (.9%) without requiring additional interventions. CONCLUSIONS The use of the DAT clip in conjunction with TTS clips achieved high complete defect closure after endoscopic resection of large LNPCLs and was associated with a .9% delayed bleeding rate. Future comparative trials and formal cost-analyses are needed to validate these findings. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT05852457.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdul Mohammed
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, AdventHealth, Orlando, Florida, USA
| | | | - Muhammad K Hasan
- Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth, Orlando, Florida, USA
| | - Ahmed Saeed
- Kansas City Gastroenterology and Hepatology Physicians Group, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | - Shai Friedland
- Department of Gastroenterology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA; VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Mohammad Bilal
- The University of Minnesota/Minneapolis VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Neil Sharma
- Division of Interventional Oncology and Surgical Endoscopy (IOSE), Parkview Cancer Institute, Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA
| | - Salmaan Jawaid
- Division of Gastroenterology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mohamed Othman
- Division of Gastroenterology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mai Ahmed Khalaf
- Division of Gastroenterology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Joo Ha Hwang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Artur Viana
- Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth, Orlando, Florida, USA
| | - Sanmeet Singh
- Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth, Orlando, Florida, USA
| | - Maham Hayat
- Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth, Orlando, Florida, USA
| | - Natalie D Cosgrove
- Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth, Orlando, Florida, USA
| | - Deepanshu Jain
- Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth, Orlando, Florida, USA
| | - Mustafa A Arain
- Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth, Orlando, Florida, USA
| | | | - Dennis Yang
- Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth, Orlando, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
O'Sullivan T, Sidhu M, Gupta S, Byth K, Elhindi J, Tate D, Cronin O, Whitfield A, Wang H, Lee E, Williams S, Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. A novel tool for case selection in endoscopic mucosal resection training. Endoscopy 2023; 55:1095-1102. [PMID: 37391184 DOI: 10.1055/a-2121-1148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large (≥ 20 mm) adenomatous nonpedunculated colonic polyps (LNPCPs) becomes widely practiced outside expert centers, appropriate training is necessary to avoid failed resection and inappropriate surgical referral. No EMR-specific tool guides case selection for endoscopists learning EMR. This study aimed to develop an EMR case selection score (EMR-CSS) to identify potentially challenging lesions for "EMR-naïve" endoscopists developing competency. METHODS Consecutive EMRs were recruited from a single center over 130 months. Lesion characteristics, intraprocedural data, and adverse events were recorded. Challenging lesions with intraprocedural bleeding (IPB), intraprocedural perforation (IPP), or unsuccessful resection were identified and predictive variables identified. Significant variables were used to form a numerical score and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to generate cutoff values. RESULTS Of 1993 LNPCPs, 286 (14.4 %) were in challenging locations (anorectal junction, ileocecal valve, or appendiceal orifice), 368 (18.5 %) procedures were complicated by IPB and 77 (3.9 %) by IPP; 110 (5.5 %) procedures were unsuccessful. The composite end point of IPB, IPP, or unsuccessful EMR was present in 526 cases (26.4 %). Lesion size, challenging location, and sessile morphology were predictive of the composite outcome. A six-point score was generated with a cutoff value of 2 demonstrating 81 % sensitivity across the training and validation cohorts. CONCLUSIONS The EMR-CSS is a novel case selection tool for conventional EMR training, which identifies a subset of adenomatous LNPCPs that can be successfully and safely attempted in early EMR training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy O'Sullivan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mayenaaz Sidhu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sunil Gupta
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Karen Byth
- Research and Education Network, Western Sydney Local Health District, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - James Elhindi
- Research and Education Network, Western Sydney Local Health District, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Reproduction and Perinatal Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David Tate
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Oliver Cronin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anthony Whitfield
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hunter Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Eric Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stephen Williams
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicholas G Burgess
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gupta S, Vosko S, Shahidi N, O'Sullivan T, Cronin O, Whitfield A, Kurup R, Sidhu M, Lee EYT, Williams SJ, Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. Endoscopic resection-related colorectal strictures: risk factors, management, and long-term outcomes. Endoscopy 2023; 55:1010-1018. [PMID: 37279786 DOI: 10.1055/a-2106-6494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colorectal strictures related to endoscopic resection (ER) of large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) may be problematic. Data on prevalence, risk factors, and management are limited. We report a prospective study of colorectal strictures following ER and describe our approach to management. METHODS We analyzed prospectively collected data over 150 months, until June 2021, for patients who underwent ER for LNPCPs ≥ 40 mm. The ER defect size was graded as < 60 %, 60 %-89 %, or ≥ 90 % of the luminal circumference. Strictures were considered "severe" if patients experienced obstructive symptoms, "moderate" if an adult colonoscope could not pass the stenosis, or "mild" if there was resistance on successful passage. Primary outcomes included stricture prevalence, risk factors, and management. RESULTS 916 LNPCPs ≥ 40 mm in 916 patients were included (median age 69 years, interquartile range 61-76 years, male sex 484 [52.8 %]). The primary resection modality was endoscopic mucosal resection in 859 (93.8 %). Risk of stricture formation with an ER defect ≥ 90 %, 60 %-89 %, and < 60 % was 74.2 % (23/31), 25.0 % (22/88), and 0.8 % (6 /797), respectively. Severe strictures only occurred with ER defects ≥ 90 % (22.6 %, 7/31). Defects < 60 % conferred low risk of only mild strictures (0.8 %, 6/797). Severe strictures required earlier (median 0.9 vs. 4.9 months; P = 0.01) and more frequent (median 3 vs. 2; P = 0.02) balloon dilations than moderate strictures. CONCLUSION Most patients with ER defects ≥ 90 % of luminal circumference developed strictures, many of which were severe and required early balloon dilation. There was minimal risk with ER defects < 60 %.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunil Gupta
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- University of Sydney, Westmead Clinical School, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sergei Vosko
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Neal Shahidi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Timothy O'Sullivan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- University of Sydney, Westmead Clinical School, Sydney, Australia
| | - Oliver Cronin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- University of Sydney, Westmead Clinical School, Sydney, Australia
| | - Anthony Whitfield
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- University of Sydney, Westmead Clinical School, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rajiv Kurup
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Mayenaaz Sidhu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- University of Sydney, Westmead Clinical School, Sydney, Australia
| | - Eric Y T Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- University of Sydney, Westmead Clinical School, Sydney, Australia
| | - Stephen J Williams
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Nicholas G Burgess
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- University of Sydney, Westmead Clinical School, Sydney, Australia
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- University of Sydney, Westmead Clinical School, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Stojic V, Zdravkovic N, Nikolic-Turnic T, Zdravkovic N, Dimitrijevic J, Misic A, Jovanovic K, Milojevic S, Zivic J. Using of endoscopic polypectomy in patients with diagnosed malignant colorectal polyp - The cross-sectional clinical study. Open Med (Wars) 2023; 18:20230811. [PMID: 37873541 PMCID: PMC10590616 DOI: 10.1515/med-2023-0811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2023] [Revised: 09/02/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic polypectomy as a therapeutic treatment for malignant alteration of colorectal polyps. In a 5-year research, 89 patients were included, who were tested and treated at the University Clinical Center Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia, with the confirmed presence of malignant alteration polyps of the colon by colonoscopy, which were removed using the method of endoscopic polypectomy and confirmed by the histopathological examination of the entire polyp. After that, the same group of patients was monitored endoscopically within a certain period, controlling polypectomy locations and the occurrence of a possible remnant of the polyp, in the period of up to 2 years of polypectomy. We observed that, with an increasing size of polyps, there is also an increase in the percentage of the complexity of endoscopic resection and the appearance of remnant with histological characteristics of the invasive cancer. The highest percentage of incomplete endoscopic resection and the appearance of remnant with histological characteristics of the invasive cancer were shown at malignant altered polyps in the field of tubulovillous adenoma. Eighteen patients in total underwent the surgical intervention. In conclusion, our data support the high efficacy of endoscopic polypectomy for the removal of the altered malignant polyp.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vladislava Stojic
- Department of Medical Statistics and Informatics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
| | - Natasa Zdravkovic
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
| | - Tamara Nikolic-Turnic
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
| | - Nebojsa Zdravkovic
- Department of Medical Statistics and Informatics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
| | - Jelena Dimitrijevic
- Department of Medical Statistics and Informatics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
| | - Aleksandra Misic
- Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
| | - Kristijan Jovanovic
- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
| | - Stefan Milojevic
- Faculty of Business Economics, EDUCONS University, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
| | - Jelena Zivic
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Xiao Q, Eckardt M, Mohamed A, Ernst H, Behrens A, Homann N, Hielscher T, Kähler G, Ebert M, Belle S, Zhan T. Onset Time and Characteristics of Postprocedural Bleeding after Endoscopic Resection of Colorectal Lesions: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. Dig Dis 2023; 42:78-86. [PMID: 37812925 DOI: 10.1159/000534109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Postprocedural bleeding is a major adverse event after endoscopic resection of colorectal lesions, but the optimal surveillance time after endoscopy is unclear. In this study, we determined onset time and characteristics of postprocedural bleeding events. METHODS We retrospectively screened patients who underwent endoscopic resection of colorectal lesions at three German hospitals between 2010 and 2019 for postprocedural bleeding events using billing codes. Only patients who required re-endoscopy were included for analysis. For identified patients, we collected demographic data, clinical courses, characteristics of colorectal lesions, and procedure-related variables. Factors associated with late-onset bleeding were determined by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS From a total of 6,820 patients with eligible billing codes, we identified 113 cases with postprocedural bleeding after endoscopic mucosal (61.9%) or snare resection (38.1%) that required re-endoscopy. The median size of the culprit lesion was 20 mm (interquartile range 14-30 mm). The median onset time of postprocedural bleeding was day 3 (interquartile range: 1-6.5 days), with 48.7% of events occurring within 48 h. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrates that a continued intake of antiplatelet drugs (OR: 3.98, 95% CI: 0.89-10.12, p = 0.025) and a flat morphology of the colorectal lesion (OR: 2.98, 95% CI: 1.08-8.01, p = 0.031) were associated with an increased risk for late postprocedural bleeding (>48 h), whereas intraprocedural bleeding was associated with a decreased risk (OR: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.04-0.50, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION Significant postprocedural bleeding can occur up to 18 days after endoscopic resection of colorectal lesions, but was predominantly observed within 48 h. Continued intake of antiplatelet drugs and a flat polyp morphology are associated with risk for late postprocedural bleeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiyun Xiao
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Maximilian Eckardt
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Awsan Mohamed
- Department of Medicine IV, Carl-Thiem-Hospital Cottbus, Cottbus, Germany
| | - Helmut Ernst
- Department of Medicine IV, Carl-Thiem-Hospital Cottbus, Cottbus, Germany
| | - Alexander Behrens
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Academic Teaching Hospital Wolfsburg, Wolfsburg, Germany
| | - Nils Homann
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Academic Teaching Hospital Wolfsburg, Wolfsburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Hielscher
- Department of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Georg Kähler
- Central Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Matthias Ebert
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
- Mannheim Cancer Center, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Sebastian Belle
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
- Central Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Tianzuo Zhan
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
- Mannheim Cancer Center, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Blasberg T, Hochberger J, Meiborg M, Jung C, Weber M, Brunk T, Leifeld L, Seif Amir Hosseini A, Wedi E. Prophylactic clipping using the over-the-scope clip (OTSC) system after complex ESD and EMR of large colon polyps. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:7520-7529. [PMID: 37418148 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10235-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Delayed bleeding is the most frequent complication after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large colon polyps. Today, prophylactic clipping with through-the-scope clips (TTSCs) is commonly used to reduce the risk of bleeding. However, the over-the-scope clip (OTSC) system might be superior to TTSCs in achieving hemostasis. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prophylactic clipping using the OTSC system after ESD or EMR of large colon polyps. METHODS This is a retrospective analysis of a prospective collected database from 2009 until 2021 of three endoscopic centers. Patients with large (≥ 20 mm) colon polyps were enrolled. All polyps were removed by either ESD or EMR. After the resection, OTSCs were prophylactically applied on parts of the mucosal defect with a high risk of delayed bleeding or/and perforation. The main outcome measurement was delayed bleeding. RESULTS A total of 75 patients underwent ESD (67%, 50/75) or EMR (33%, 25/75) in the colorectum. The mean resected specimen diameter was 57 mm ± 24.1 (range 22-98 mm). The mean number of OTSCs placed on the mucosal defect was 2 (range 1-5). None of the mucosal defects were completely closed. Intraprocedural bleeding occurred in 5.3% (ESD 2.0% vs. EMR 12.0%; P = 0.105), and intraprocedural perforation occurred in 6.7% (ESD 8% vs. EMR 4%; P = 0.659) of the patients. Hemostasis was achieved in 100% of cases of intraprocedural bleeding, whereas two patients required surgical conversion due to intraprocedural perforation. Among the remaining 73 patients who received prosphylactic clipping, delayed bleeding occurred in 1.4% (ESD 0% vs. EMR 4.2%; P = 0.329), and delayed perforation occurred in 0%. CONCLUSIONS The prophylactic partial closure of large post-ESD/EMR mucosal defects using OTSCs could serve as an effective strategy to reduce the risk of delayed bleeding and perforation. The prophylactic partial closure of large complex post-ESD/EMR mucosal defects using OTSCs could serve as an effective strategy to reduce the risk of delayed bleeding and perforation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Blasberg
- Division of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Interventional Endoscopy, Sana Clinic Offenbach, Starkenburgring 66, 63069, Offenbach, Germany
| | - J Hochberger
- Department of Gastroenterology, Vivantes Hospital Friedrichshain Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - M Meiborg
- Division of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Interventional Endoscopy, Sana Clinic Offenbach, Starkenburgring 66, 63069, Offenbach, Germany
| | - C Jung
- Clinic for Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Endocrinology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - M Weber
- Division of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Interventional Endoscopy, Sana Clinic Offenbach, Starkenburgring 66, 63069, Offenbach, Germany
| | - T Brunk
- Department of Gastroenterology, Vivantes Hospital Friedrichshain Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - L Leifeld
- Department of Internal Medicine III, St. Bernward Hospital, Hildesheim, Germany
| | - A Seif Amir Hosseini
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - E Wedi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Interventional Endoscopy, Sana Clinic Offenbach, Starkenburgring 66, 63069, Offenbach, Germany.
- Clinic for Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Endocrinology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tokuhara M, Shimatani M, Tominaga K, Nakahira H, Ohtsu T, Kouda K, Naganuma M. Evaluation of a new method, "non-injection resection using bipolar soft coagulation mode (NIRBS)", for colonic adenomatous lesions. Clin Endosc 2023; 56:623-632. [PMID: 37524565 PMCID: PMC10565442 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2022.200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 08/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Endoscopic resection of all colorectal adenomatous lesions with a low complication rate, simplicity, and negative residuals is challenging. Hence, we developed a new method called "non-injection resection using bipolar soft coagulation mode (NIRBS)" method, adapted for colorectal lesions. In addition, we evaluated the effectiveness of this method. METHODS We performed NIRBS throughout a 12-month period for all colorectal lesions which snare resection was acceptable without cancerous lesions infiltrating deeper than the submucosal layer. RESULTS A total of 746 resected lesions were included in the study, with a 4.5 mm mean size (range, 1-35 mm). The major pathological breakdowns were as follows: 64.3% (480/746) were adenomas, and 5.0% (37/746) were intraepithelial adenocarcinomas (Tis lesions). No residuals were observed in any of the 37 Tis lesions (mean size, 15.3 mm). Adverse events included bleeding (0.4%) but no perforation. CONCLUSIONS NIRBS allowed the resection of multiple lesions with simplicity because of the non-injection and without perforating due to the minimal burn effect of the bipolar snare set in the soft coagulation mode. Therefore, NIRBS can be used to resect adenomatous lesions easily, including Tis lesions, from small to large lesions without leaving residuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitsuo Tokuhara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Japan Community Healthcare Organization Hoshigaoka Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kansai Medical University Hirakata Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masaaki Shimatani
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kansai Medical University Hirakata Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kazunari Tominaga
- Department of Gastroenterology, Japan Community Healthcare Organization Hoshigaoka Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hiroko Nakahira
- Department of Gastroenterology, Japan Community Healthcare Organization Hoshigaoka Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takuya Ohtsu
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kansai Medical University Hirakata Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Katsuyasu Kouda
- Department of Hygiene and Public Health, Kansai Medical University Hirakata Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Makoto Naganuma
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kansai Medical University Hirakata Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Cronin O, Bourke MJ. Endoscopic Management of Large Non-Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3805. [PMID: 37568621 PMCID: PMC10417738 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps ≥20 mm (LNPCPs) comprise approximately 1% of all colorectal polyps. LNPCPs more commonly contain high-grade dysplasia, covert and overt cancer. These lesions can be resected using several means, including conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), cold-snare EMR (C-EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). This review aimed to provide a comprehensive, critical and objective analysis of ER techniques. Evidence-based, selective resection algorithms should be used when choosing the most appropriate technique to ensure the safe and effective removal of LNPCPs. Due to its enhanced safety and comparable efficacy, there has been a paradigm shift towards cold-snare polypectomy (CSP) for the removal of small polyps (<10 mm). This technique is now being applied to the management of LNPCPs; however, further research is required to define the optimal LNPCP subtypes to target and the viable upper size limit. Adjuvant techniques, such as thermal ablation of the resection margin, significantly reduce recurrence risk. Bleeding risk can be mitigated using through-the-scope clips to close defects in the right colon. Endoscopic surveillance is important to detect recurrence and synchronous lesions. Recurrence can be readily managed using an endoscopic approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Cronin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - Michael J. Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Leifeld L, Denzer U, Frieling T, Jakobs R, Faiss S, Lenzen H, Lynen P, Mayerle J, Ockenga J, Tappe U, Terjung B, Wedemeyer H, Albert J. [Structural, procedural, and personnel requirements for cross-sectoral provision of endoscopic gastroenterological procedures]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2023; 61:799-809. [PMID: 37494075 DOI: 10.1055/a-2105-4995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
Gastroenterology has made crucial advances in diagnostic and interventional endoscopic procedures, opening up improvements in the treatment of many patients. Thus, organ-preserving treatments are increasingly being made possible, replacing more invasive organ resecting surgical procedures. At the same time, the degree of complexity and risks varies widely between different endoscopic procedures. In many cases, simpler endoscopic procedures are now offered on an outpatient basis. Further potential for cross-sectoral performance of endoscopic procedures exists in the case of complex endoscopic procedures, which, however, require special structural, procedural and personnel requirements in order to provide quality-assured treatment, enable post-interventional monitoring and, if necessary, take measures to ensure the success of the treatment. We summarize the essential prerequisites and limitations for cross-sector performance of endoscopic procedures in gastroenterology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ludger Leifeld
- Medizinische Klinik 3 - Allgemeine Innere Medizin und Gastroenterologie, St Bernward Krankenhaus, Hildesheim, Deutschland
| | - Ulrike Denzer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gastroenterologie, Endokrinologie, Stoffwechsel und klinische Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg - Standort Marburg, Marburg, Deutschland
| | - Thomas Frieling
- Medizinische Klinik II, Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Deutschland
| | - Ralf Jakobs
- Medizinische Klinik C mit Schwerpunkt Gastroenterologie, Klinikum Ludwigshafen, Deutschland
| | - Siegbert Faiss
- Gastroenterologie, Sana Klinikum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Henrike Lenzen
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Deutschland
| | - Petra Lynen
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS), Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Julia Mayerle
- Klinik für Innere Medizin II, LMU München, Deutschland
| | - Johann Ockenga
- Medizinische Klinik II, Gesundheit Nord, Klinikverbund Bremen, Deutschland
| | - Ulrich Tappe
- Gastropraxis an der St. Barbara Klinik, Hamm, Deutschland
| | - Birgit Terjung
- Klinik für Innere Medizin und Gastroenterologie, GFO Kliniken Bonn, Deutschland
| | - Heiner Wedemeyer
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Deutschland
| | - Jörg Albert
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, gastroenterologische Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Pneumologie, Klinikum der Landeshauptstadt Stuttgart gemeinnützige Kommunalanstalt öffentlichen Rechts (gKAöR), Stuttgart, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bi D, Zhang LY, Alqaisieh M, Shrigiriwar A, Farha J, Mahmoud T, Akiki K, Almario JA, Shah-Khan SM, Gordon SR, Adler JM, Radetic M, Draganov PV, David YN, Shinn B, Mohammed Z, Schlachterman A, Yuen S, Al-Taee A, Yunseok N, Trasolini R, Bejjani M, Ghandour B, Ramberan H, Canakis A, Ngamruengphong S, Storm AC, Singh S, Pohl H, Bucobo JC, Buscaglia JM, D'Souza LS, Qumseya B, Kumta NA, Kumar A, Haber GB, Aihara H, Sawhney M, Kim R, Berzin TM, Khashab MA. Novel through-the-scope suture closure of colonic EMR defects (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98:122-129. [PMID: 36889364 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.02.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Large colon polyps removed by EMR can be complicated by delayed bleeding. Prophylactic defect clip closure can reduce post-EMR bleeding. Larger defects can be challenging to close using through-the-scope clips (TTSCs), and proximal defects are difficult to reach using over-the-scope techniques. A novel, through-the-scope suturing (TTSS) device allows direct closure of mucosal defects without scope withdrawal. The goal of this study was to evaluate the rate of delayed bleeding after the closure of large colon polyp EMR sites with TTSS. METHODS A multicenter retrospective cohort study was performed involving 13 centers. All defect closure by TTSS after EMR of colon polyps ≥2 cm from January 2021 to February 2022 were included. The primary outcome was rate of delayed bleeding. RESULTS A total of 94 patients (52% female; mean age, 65 years) underwent EMR of predominantly right-sided (n = 62 [66%]) colon polyps (median size, 35 mm; interquartile range, 30-40 mm) followed by defect closure with TTSS during the study period. All defects were successfully closed with TTSS alone (n = 62 [66%]) or with TTSS and TTSCs (n = 32 [34%]), using a median of 1 (interquartile range, 1-1) TTSS system. Delayed bleeding occurred in 3 patients (3.2%), with 2 requiring repeated endoscopic evaluation/treatment (moderate). CONCLUSION TTSS alone or with TTSCs was effective in achieving complete closure of all post-EMR defects, despite a large lesion size. After TTSS closure with or without adjunctive devices, delayed bleeding was seen in 3.2% of cases. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings before wider adoption of TTSS for large polypectomy closure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danse Bi
- Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | | | - Jad Farha
- Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Tala Mahmoud
- Mayo Clinic Minnesota, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Karl Akiki
- Mayo Clinic Minnesota, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | | | - Stuart R Gordon
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Jeffrey M Adler
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Mark Radetic
- University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | | | | | - Brianna Shinn
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Zahraa Mohammed
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Sofia Yuen
- NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Heiko Pohl
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Anand Kumar
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | - Mandeep Sawhney
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Raymond Kim
- University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Tyler M Berzin
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Tate DJ, Argenziano ME, Anderson J, Bhandari P, Boškoski I, Bugajski M, Desomer L, Heitman SJ, Kashida H, Kriazhov V, Lee RRT, Lyutakov I, Pimentel-Nunes P, Rivero-Sánchez L, Thomas-Gibson S, Thorlacius H, Bourke MJ, Tham TC, Bisschops R. Curriculum for training in endoscopic mucosal resection in the colon: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2023. [PMID: 37285908 DOI: 10.1055/a-2077-0497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is the standard of care for the complete removal of large (≥ 10 mm) nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs). Increased detection of LNPCPs owing to screening colonoscopy, plus high observed rates of incomplete resection and need for surgery call for a standardized approach to training in EMR. 1 : Trainees in EMR should have achieved basic competence in diagnostic colonoscopy, < 10-mm polypectomy, pedunculated polypectomy, and common methods of gastrointestinal endoscopic hemostasis. The role of formal training courses is emphasized. Training may then commence in vivo under the direct supervision of a trainer. 2 : Endoscopy units training endoscopists in EMR should have specific processes in place to support and facilitate training. 3: A trained EMR practitioner should have mastered theoretical knowledge including how to assess an LNPCP for risk of submucosal invasion, how to interpret the potential difficulty of a particular EMR procedure, how to decide whether to remove a particular LNPCP en bloc or piecemeal, whether the risks of electrosurgical energy can be avoided for a particular LNPCP, the different devices required for EMR, management of adverse events, and interpretation of reports provided by histopathologists. 4: Trained EMR practitioners should be familiar with the patient consent process for EMR. 5: The development of endoscopic non-technical skills (ENTS) and team interaction are important for trainees in EMR. 6: Differences in recommended technique exist between EMR performed with and without electrosurgical energy. Common to both is a standardized technique based upon dynamic injection, controlled and precise snare placement, safety checks prior to the application of tissue transection (cold snare) or electrosurgical energy (hot snare), and interpretation of the post-EMR resection defect. 7: A trained EMR practitioner must be able to manage adverse events associated with EMR including intraprocedural bleeding and perforation, and post-procedural bleeding. Delayed perforation should be avoided by correct interpretation of the post-EMR defect and treatment of deep mural injury. 8: A trained EMR practitioner must be able to communicate EMR procedural findings to patients and provide them with a plan in case of adverse events after discharge and a follow-up plan. 9: A trained EMR practitioner must be able to detect and interrogate a post-endoscopic resection scar for residual or recurrent adenoma and apply treatment if necessary. 10: Prior to independent practice, a minimum of 30 EMR procedures should be performed, culminating in a trainer-guided assessment of competency using a validated assessment tool, taking account of procedural difficulty (e. g. using the SMSA polyp score). 11: Trained practitioners should log their key performance indicators (KPIs) of polypectomy during independent practice. A guide for target KPIs is provided in this document.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Tate
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Maria Eva Argenziano
- Clinic of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Emergency Digestive Endoscopy, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - John Anderson
- Cheltenham General Hospital, Gloucestershire Hospitals Foundation Trust, Cheltenham, UK
| | - Pradeep Bhandari
- Endoscopy Department, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Ivo Boškoski
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Marek Bugajski
- Department of Gastroenterology, Luxmed Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Lobke Desomer
- AZ Delta Roeselare, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Steven J Heitman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Hiroshi Kashida
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University, Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Vladimir Kriazhov
- Endoscopy Department, Nizhny Novgorod Regional Clinical Oncology Center, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia Federation
| | - Ralph R T Lee
- The Ottawa Hospital - Civic Campus, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Ivan Lyutakov
- University Hospital Tsaritsa Yoanna-ISUL, Medical University Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Pedro Pimentel-Nunes
- Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Center for Research in Health Technologies and Information Systems (CINTESIS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Surgery and Physiology Department, Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Liseth Rivero-Sánchez
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Enfermedades Hepaticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Tony C Tham
- Division of Gastroenterology, Ulster Hospital, Dundonald, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Raf Bisschops
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, TARGID, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Gopakumar H, Vohra I, Sharma NR, Puli SR. Efficacy of self-assembling peptide in mitigating delayed bleeding after advanced endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal lesions: A meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2023; 11:E553-E560. [PMID: 37251794 PMCID: PMC10219783 DOI: 10.1055/a-2057-4505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Advanced endoscopic resection techniques carry a risk of delayed bleeding (DB). A novel fully synthetic self-assembling peptide (SAP) has shown promising results in mitigating this risk. In this meta-analysis, we evaluated all available data and analyzed the effectiveness of SAP in reducing DB after advanced endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal luminal lesions. Patients and methods Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) from January 2010 through October 2022 were searched for publications addressing the use of SAP solution in patients undergoing advanced endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal lesions. Pooled proportions were calculated using fixed (inverse variance) and random-effects (DerSimonian-Laird) models. Results The initial search identified 277 studies, of which 63 relevant articles were reviewed. The final analysis included data from six studies comprising 307 patients that met inclusion criteria. The pooled rate of DB was 5.73 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] = 3.42-8.59). Mean patient age was 69.40 years ± 1.82. The weighted mean size of resected lesions was 36.20 mm (95 % CI = 33.37-39.02). Endoscopic submucosal dissection was used in 72.69 % (95 % CI = 67.62-77.48), while endoscopic mucosal resection was used in 26.42 % (95 % CI = 21.69-31.44) of the procedures. Among the 307 patients, 36 % were on antithrombotic medications. No adverse events (AEs) were attributable to using SAP, with a pooled rate of 0.00 % (95 % CI = 0.00-1.49). Conclusions SAP solution appears promising in reducing post-procedural DB after advanced endoscopic resection of high-risk gastrointestinal lesions with no reported AEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harishankar Gopakumar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, Illinois, United States
| | - Ishaan Vohra
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, Illinois, United States
| | - Neil R. Sharma
- Parkview Cancer Institute, Interventional Oncology & Surgical Endoscopy (IOSE) division, GI Oncology Tumor Site Team, Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States
| | - Srinivas R. Puli
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, Illinois, United States
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Zachou M, Varytimiadis K, Androutsakos T, Katsaras G, Zoumpouli C, Lalla E, Nifora M, Karantanos P, Nikiteas N, Sougioultzis S, Kalaitzakis E, Kykalos S. Protocol design for randomized clinical trial to compare underwater cold snare polypectomy to conventional cold snare polypectomy for non-pedunculated colon polyps of size 5-10 mm (COLDWATER study). Tech Coloproctol 2023; 27:325-333. [PMID: 36399201 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-022-02731-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer is internationally the third leading cause of death from a malignant disease. The aim of screening colonoscopy in adults > 45 years of age is early diagnosis and treatment of precancerous polyps. Endoscopic polyp removal (polypectomy) can be achieved with various techniques depending on the size, morphology, and location of the polyp. According to current guidelines, small non-pedunculated polyps should be removed with a cold snare after the colorectal lumen has been insufflated with air (conventional cold snare polypectomy).In recent years, several studies have described the benefits of water aided colonoscopy, as well as the safety and efficacy of underwater cold snare polypectomy for large colon polyps. However, there are insufficient data on conventional and underwater techniques for small polyps, the most commonly diagnosed colorectal polyps. METHODS We have designed a prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial to compare the safety and efficacy of conventional and underwater cold snare polypectomy for non-pedunculated polyps 5-10 mm in size. A total of 398 polyps will be randomized. Randomization will be carried out using the random numbers method of Microsoft Excel 2016. The primary endpoint is the muscularis mucosa resection rate. Secondary endpoints are the depth and percentage of R0 excisions, complications, and the recurrence rate at follow-up endoscopy 6-12 months after polypectomy. DISCUSSION We hypothesize underwater polypectomy will result in a higher muscularis mucosa resection rate. The results of our study will provide useful data for the development of guidelines in polypectomy techniques for non-pedunculated polyps 5-10 mm in size. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05273697.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Zachou
- Second Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, "Laikon" General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece. .,Department of Gastroenterology, Sismanogleio General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
| | - K Varytimiadis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sismanogleio General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - T Androutsakos
- Department of Pathophysiology, "Laikon" General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - G Katsaras
- Second Neonatal Department and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), Medical School, "Papageorgiou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.,Paediatric Department, General Hospital of Pella-Hospital Unit of Edessa, Edessa, Greece
| | - C Zoumpouli
- Department of Pathology, Sismanogleio General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - E Lalla
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sismanogleio General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - M Nifora
- Department of Pathology, Sismanogleio General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - P Karantanos
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sismanogleio General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - N Nikiteas
- Second Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, "Laikon" General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - S Sougioultzis
- Department of Pathophysiology, "Laikon" General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - E Kalaitzakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
| | - S Kykalos
- Second Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, "Laikon" General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Libânio D, Pimentel-Nunes P, Bastiaansen B, Bisschops R, Bourke MJ, Deprez PH, Esposito G, Lemmers A, Leclercq P, Maselli R, Messmann H, Pech O, Pioche M, Vieth M, Weusten BLAM, Fuccio L, Bhandari P, Dinis-Ribeiro M. Endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques and technology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Review. Endoscopy 2023; 55:361-389. [PMID: 36882090 DOI: 10.1055/a-2031-0874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
Abstract
ESGE suggests conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD; marking and mucosal incision followed by circumferential incision and stepwise submucosal dissection) for most esophageal and gastric lesions. ESGE suggests tunneling ESD for esophageal lesions involving more than two-thirds of the esophageal circumference. ESGE recommends the pocket-creation method for colorectal ESD, at least if traction devices are not used. The use of dedicated ESD knives with size adequate to the location/thickness of the gastrointestinal wall is recommended. It is suggested that isotonic saline or viscous solutions can be used for submucosal injection. ESGE recommends traction methods in esophageal and colorectal ESD and in selected gastric lesions. After gastric ESD, coagulation of visible vessels is recommended, and post-procedural high dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) (or vonoprazan). ESGE recommends against routine closure of the ESD defect, except in duodenal ESD. ESGE recommends corticosteroids after resection of > 50 % of the esophageal circumference. The use of carbon dioxide when performing ESD is recommended. ESGE recommends against the performance of second-look endoscopy after ESD. ESGE recommends endoscopy/colonoscopy in the case of significant bleeding (hemodynamic instability, drop in hemoglobin > 2 g/dL, severe ongoing bleeding) to perform endoscopic hemostasis with thermal methods or clipping; hemostatic powders represent rescue therapies. ESGE recommends closure of immediate perforations with clips (through-the-scope or cap-mounted, depending on the size and shape of the perforation), as soon as possible but ideally after securing a good plane for further dissection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diogo Libânio
- Department of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute - Porto, Portugal.,MEDCIDS, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center (Porto.CCC) & RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Porto, Portugal
| | - Pedro Pimentel-Nunes
- Department of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, FMUP, Porto, Portugal.,Gastroenterology, Unilabs, Portugal
| | - Barbara Bastiaansen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology & Metabolism, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Raf Bisschops
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, TARGID, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,Western Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Pierre H Deprez
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gianluca Esposito
- Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
| | - Arnaud Lemmers
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Philippe Leclercq
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, TARGID, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Roberta Maselli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy. Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Helmut Messmann
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Oliver Pech
- Department of Gastroenterology and Interventional Endoscopy, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brueder Regensburg, Germany
| | - Mathieu Pioche
- Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Michael Vieth
- Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Bas L A M Weusten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.,University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
| | - Lorenzo Fuccio
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Gastroenterology Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Pradeep Bhandari
- Department of Gastroenterology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Mario Dinis-Ribeiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute - Porto, Portugal.,MEDCIDS, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center (Porto.CCC) & RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abu Arisha M, Scapa E, Wishahi E, Korytny A, Gorelik Y, Mazzawi F, Khader M, Muaalem R, Bana S, Awadie H, Bourke MJ, Klein A. Impact of margin ablation after EMR of large nonpedunculated colonic polyps in routine clinical practice. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97:559-567. [PMID: 36328207 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.10.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Revised: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Owing to its simplicity, effectiveness, and safety, EMR is the preferred treatment for the majority of large (≥20 mm) nonpedunculated colonic polyps (LNPCPs); however, residual and recurrent adenomas (RRAs) encountered during surveillance constitute a major limitation. Thermal ablation of the post-EMR mucosal defect margin has been shown to be highly efficacious in reducing RRA in a randomized trial setting, but data on effectiveness in clinical practice are scarce. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of this technique for reducing RRAs in routine clinical practice. METHODS We analyzed data collected in 3 hospitals in Israel: Prospective data were available in 2 hospitals where margin thermal ablation with snare-tip soft coagulation (STSC) is routinely performed after EMR of LNPCP (TA-EMR). Only retrospective data were available from the third center, which exclusively did not perform STSC (standard EMR] [S-EMR]), during the study period. Surveillance was performed 4 to 6 months after resection. RRA was assessed endoscopically with high-definition white light and optical chromoendoscopy. The primary endpoint was RRA at first surveillance colonoscopy. RESULTS Data from 764 patients with 824 LNPCPs were analyzed. The patient and lesion characteristics were similar between the groups. Four hundred sixty-four LNPCPs were treated by TA-EMR and 360 LNPCPs by S-EMR. RRA at first surveillance colonoscopy was detected in 14 (3.6%) of lesions in the TA-EMR group compared with 96 (31.6%) in the S-EMR group (P < .001; RR = .14; 95% CI, .07-.29). Adverse events were comparable between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION TA-EMR leads to a significant reduction in post-EMR recurrence in routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Abu Arisha
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel; Department of Internal Medicine D, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Erez Scapa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Efad Wishahi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Alexander Korytny
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Yuri Gorelik
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Fares Mazzawi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel; Department of Internal Medicine D, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Majd Khader
- Department of Gastroenterology, Barzilai Medical Center, Ashkelon, Israel
| | - Rawia Muaalem
- Department of Gastroenterology, Holy Family Hospital, Nazareth, Israel
| | - Suzan Bana
- Department of Gastroenterology, Holy Family Hospital, Nazareth, Israel
| | - Halim Awadie
- Department of Gastroenterology, Holy Family Hospital, Nazareth, Israel
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, and Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Amir Klein
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bustamante-Balén M. How to avoid overtreatment of benign colorectal lesions: Rationale for an evidence-based management. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28:6619-6631. [PMID: 36620344 PMCID: PMC9813935 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i47.6619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Revised: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Implementing population-based screening programs for colorectal cancer has led to an increase in the detection of large but benign histological lesions. Currently, endoscopic mucosal resection can be considered the standard technique for the removal of benign lesions of the colon due to its excellent safety profile and good clinical results. However, several studies from different geographic areas agree that many benign colon lesions are still referred for surgery. Moreover, the referral rate to surgery is not decreasing over the years, despite the theoretical improvement of endoscopic resection techniques. This article will review the leading causes for benign colorectal lesions to be referred for surgery and the influence of the endoscopist experience on the referral rate. It will also describe how to categorize a polyp as complex for resection and consider an endoscopist as an expert in endoscopic resection. And finally, we will propose a framework for the accurate and evidence-based treatment of complex benign colorectal lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Bustamante-Balén
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Research Group, Hospital Universitari I Politècnic La Fe, Health Research Institute Hospital La Fe (IISLaFe), Valencia 46026, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Li DF, Van Overbeke L, Ohata K, Wang LS, Yao J. Efficacy and safety of cold snare polypectomy for sessile serrated polyps ≥ 10 mm: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Liver Dis 2022; 54:1486-1493. [PMID: 35168877 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2022.01.132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Revised: 01/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is a promising technique for the removal of sessile serrated polyps (SSPs) ≥ 10 mm. However, the efficacy and safety of this technique remain undetermined. AIMS We aimed to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of CSP for SSPs ≥ 10 mm. METHODS PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched up to January 2021. RESULTS A total of 10 studies consisting of 1727 SSPs (range, 10-40 mm) from 1021 patients were included. The overall rates of technical success, adverse events (AEs) and residual SSPs were 100%, 0.7% and 2.9%, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that the rates of technical success and AEs were comparable between CSP and cold endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) (99.9% vs. 100% and 1.3% vs. 0.5%, respectively), between the proximal and distal colon (100% vs. 99.9% and 0.3% vs. 0, respectively), and between polyps of 10-19 mm and ≥20 mm (99.8% vs. 100% and 0.9% vs. 0, respectively). However, subgroup analysis showed that the rate of residual SSPs was slightly lower in CSP compared with cold EMR (1.3% vs. 3.9%), as well as in polyps of 10-19 mm compared with those ≥20 mm (3.1% vs. 4.7%). CONCLUSION CSP was an effective and safe technique for removing SSPs ≥ 10 mm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- De-Feng Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), No.1017, Dongmen North Road, Luohu District, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518020, China
| | | | - Ken Ohata
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 141-8625, Japan
| | - Li-Sheng Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), No.1017, Dongmen North Road, Luohu District, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518020, China.
| | - Jun Yao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), No.1017, Dongmen North Road, Luohu District, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518020, China.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Forbes N, Gupta S, Frehlich L, Meng ZW, Ruan Y, Montori S, Chebaa BR, Dunbar KB, Heitman SJ, Feagins LA, Albéniz E, Pohl H, Bourke MJ. Clip closure to prevent adverse events after EMR of proximal large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 96:721-731.e2. [PMID: 35667388 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.05.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS After EMR, prophylactic clipping is often performed to prevent clinically significant post-EMR bleeding (CSPEB) and other adverse events (AEs). Prior evidence syntheses have lacked sufficient power to assess clipping in relevant subgroups or in nonbleeding AEs. We performed a meta-analysis of individual patient data (IPD) from randomized trials assessing the efficacy of clipping to prevent AEs after EMR of proximal large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) ≥20 mm. METHODS We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, and PubMed from inception to May 19, 2021. Two reviewers screened citations in duplicate. Corresponding authors of eligible studies were invited to contribute IPD. A random-effects 1-stage model was specified for estimating pooled effects, adjusting for patient sex and age and for lesion location and size, whereas a fixed-effects model was used for traditional meta-analyses. RESULTS From 3145 citations, 4 trials were included, representing 1248 patients with proximal LNPCPs. The overall rate of CSPEB was 3.5% and 9.0% in clipped and unclipped patients, respectively. IPD were available for 1150 patients, in which prophylactic clipping prevented CSPEB with an odds ratio (OR) of .31 (95% confidence interval [CI], .17-.54). Clipping was not associated with perforation or abdominal pain, with ORs of .78 (95% CI, .17-3.54) and .67 (95% CI, .20-2.22), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Prophylactic clipping is efficacious in preventing CSPEB after EMR of proximal LNPCPs. Therefore, clip closure should be considered a standard component of EMR of LNPCPs in the proximal colon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nauzer Forbes
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sunil Gupta
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Levi Frehlich
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Zhao Wu Meng
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Yibing Ruan
- Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Cancer Control Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sheyla Montori
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Research Unit, Navarrabiomed Biomedical Research Center, UPNA, IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Benjamin R Chebaa
- Department of Medicine, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Kerry B Dunbar
- Department of Medicine, VA North Texas Healthcare System, Dallas, Texas, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Steven J Heitman
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Linda A Feagins
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Eduardo Albéniz
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Research Unit, Navarrabiomed Biomedical Research Center, UPNA, IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain; Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Heiko Pohl
- Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA; Department of Gastroenterology, VA Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont, USA; Department of Gastroenterology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Giri S, Jearth V, Darak H, Sundaram S. Outcomes of thin versus thick-wire snares for cold snare polypectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Endosc 2022; 55:742-750. [PMID: 36347525 PMCID: PMC9726435 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2022.141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is commonly used for the resection of colorectal polyps ≤10 mm. Data regarding the influence of snare type on CSP effectiveness are conflicting. Hence, this meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes and safety of thin- and thick-wire snares for CSP. METHODS A comprehensive search of the literature published between 2000 and 2021 was performed of various databases for comparative studies evaluating the outcomes of thin- versus thick-wire snares for CSP. RESULTS Five studies with data on 1,425 polyps were included in the analysis. The thick-wire snare was comparable to the thin-wire snare with respect to complete histological resection (risk ratio [RR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-1.09), overall bleeding (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.40-2.40), polyp retrieval (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.97-1.04), and involvement of submucosa in the resection specimen (RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.72-2.28). There was no publication bias and a small study effect, and the relative effects remained the same in the sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSION CSP using a thin-wire snare has no additional benefit over thick-wire snares in small colorectal polyps. Factors other than snare design may play a role in improving CSP outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vaneet Jearth
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Harish Darak
- Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Sridhar Sundaram
- Department of Digestive Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, TATA Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India,Correspondence: Sridhar Sundaram Department of Digestive Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, TATA Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Dr. E Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai 400012, India E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Lu Y, Zhou X, Chen H, Ding C, Si X. Establishment of a model for predicting delayed post-polypectomy bleeding: A real-world retrospective study. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:1035646. [PMID: 36341244 PMCID: PMC9626650 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1035646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Delayed post-polypectomy bleeding (DPPB) is the most common complication which occurs within 30 days after polypectomy, it has become rather common with the widespread of colorectal cancer screening. It is important to clarified predictors of DPPB and identify patients at high risk. Materials and methods This was a real-world retrospective study based on medical records from The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Cases of patients who underwent colonoscopic polypectomy between January 2016 and December 2020 were reviewed to identify risk factors of DPPB. We use the LASSO-Logistic regression analysis model to identify independent predictors and create a predictive model. The model finally got visualized by developing a nomogram. Results Colonoscopic polypectomy was done on 16,925 patients in our study. DPPB occurred in 125 (0.74%) of these instances. In multivariate analysis, age, sex, hypertension, polyp location, polyp size, and operative modality were found to be independent risk factors and were integrated for the construction of a nomogram. The model’s C-index is 0.801 (95%CI: 0.761–0.846). We also found polyps located at the right semicolon and polyp ≥ 1 cm associated with active bleeding under the therapeutic colonoscopy. Conclusion Young age, male, hypertension, polyp ≥ 1 cm, proximal colon location and operative modality were finally identified as significant predictors of DPPB. We developed and validated a nomogram which performs well in predicting the incidence of DPPB, the model we established can be used as a valuable screening tool to identify patients who are at high risk of bleeding.
Collapse
|
34
|
Kandel P, Hussain M, Yadav D, Dhungana SK, Brahmbhatt B, Raimondo M, Lukens FJ, Bachuwa G, Wallace MB. Post-EMR for colorectal polyps, thermal ablation of defects reduces adenoma recurrence: A meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10:E1399-E1405. [PMID: 36262518 PMCID: PMC9576327 DOI: 10.1055/a-1922-7646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Adenoma recurrence is one of the key limitations of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), which occurs in 15 % to 30 % of cases during first surveillance colonoscopy. The main hypothesis behind adenoma recurrence is leftover micro-adenomas at the margins of post-EMR defects. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we evaluated the efficacy of snare tip soft coagulation (STSC) at the margins of mucosal defects to reduce adenoma recurrence and bleeding complications. Methods Electronic databases such as PubMed and the Cochrane library were used for systematic literature search. Studies with polyps only resected by piecemeal EMR and active treatment: with STSC, comparator: non-STSC were included. A random effects model was used to calculate the summary of risk ratio and 95 % confidence intervals. The main outcome of the study was to compare the effect of STSC versus non-STSC with respect to adenoma recurrence at first surveillance colonoscopy after thermal ablation of post-EMR defects. Results Five studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The total number patients who completed first surveillance colonoscopy (SC1) in the STSC group was 534 and in the non-STSC group was 514. The pooled adenoma recurrence rate was 6 % (37 of 534 cases) in the STSC arm and 22 % (115 of 514 cases) in the non-STSC arm, (odds ratio [OR] 0.26, 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.16-0.41, P = 0.001). The pooled delayed post-EMR bleeding rate 19 % (67 of 343) in the STSC arm and 22 % (78 of 341) in the non-STSC arm (OR 0.82, 95 %CI, 0.57-1.18). Conclusions Thermal ablation of post-EMR defects significantly reduces adenoma recurrence at first surveillance colonoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pujan Kandel
- Michigan State University/Hurley Medical Center, Flint, Michigan, United States
| | - Murtaza Hussain
- Michigan State University/Hurley Medical Center, Flint, Michigan, United States
| | - Deepesh Yadav
- Michigan State University/Hurley Medical Center, Flint, Michigan, United States
| | - Santosh K. Dhungana
- Michigan State University/Hurley Medical Center, Flint, Michigan, United States
| | | | - Massimo Raimondo
- Mayo Clinic's Campus in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
| | - Frank J. Lukens
- Mayo Clinic's Campus in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
| | - Ghassan Bachuwa
- Michigan State University/Hurley Medical Center, Flint, Michigan, United States
| | - Michael B. Wallace
- Mayo Clinic's Campus in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, United States,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Chandan S, Deliwala S, Khan SR, Ramai D, Mohan BP, Bilal M, Facciorusso A, Kassab LL, Kamal F, Dhindsa B, Perisetti A, Adler DG. Advanced Endoscopic Resection Techniques in Cirrhosis-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 67:4813-4826. [PMID: 34993682 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-021-07364-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS While safety and effectiveness of advanced endoscopic resection techniques such as endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been well established in general population, data regarding their utility in patients with cirrhosis is limited. METHODS We searched multiple databases from inception through July 2021 to identify studies that reported on outcomes of EMR and/or ESD in patients with cirrhosis. Meta-analysis was performed to determine pooled rates of immediate and delayed bleeding, perforation, death as well as rates of successful en bloc and R0 resection. Pooled relative risk (RR) was calculated for each outcome between patients with and without cirrhosis. RESULTS Ten studies with a total of 3244 patients were included in the final analysis. Pooled rates of immediate & delayed bleeding, perforation, and death during EMR and/or ESD in patients with cirrhosis were 9.5% (CI 4.0-21.1), 6.6% (CI 4.2-10.3), 2.1% (CI 1.1-3.9) and 0.6% (CI 0.2-1.7), respectively. Pooled rates of successful en bloc and R0 resection were 93% (CI 85.9-96.7) and 90.8% (CI 86.5-93.8), respectively. While incidence of immediate bleeding was higher in patients with cirrhosis, there was no statistically significant difference in any of the other outcomes between the patient groups. CONCLUSIONS Our study shows that performing EMR and ESD for gastrointestinal lesions in patients with cirrhosis is both safe and effective. The risks of procedural complications parallel those reported in general population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saurabh Chandan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CHI Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Smit Deliwala
- Internal Medicine, Hurley Medical Center, Flint, MI, USA
| | - Shahab R Khan
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Babu P Mohan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Mohammad Bilal
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Minnesota & Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | | | - Faisal Kamal
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Banreet Dhindsa
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | | | - Douglas G Adler
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
- Center for Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy (CATE), Centura Health, Porter Adventist Hospital, Denver, CO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Lau LHS, Guo CLT, Lee JKK, Chan CST, Mak JWY, Wong SH, Yip TCF, Wong GLH, Wong VWS, Chan FKL, Tang RSY. Effectiveness of prophylactic clipping in preventing postpolypectomy bleeding in oral anticoagulant users: a propensity-score analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 96:530-542.e1. [PMID: 35413329 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Evidence of prophylactic clipping is inconsistent except for proximal and large colonic lesions in the general population. Although warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are significant risk factors of postpolypectomy bleeding (PPB), dedicated studies to examine the benefit of prophylactic clipping in these high-risk patients remain limited. METHODS We performed a propensity score-weighted retrospective cohort study from 2012 to 2020. Patients who received an oral anticoagulant and underwent colonoscopic polypectomy were included. Data were collected on baseline demographics, medications (anticoagulant, antiplatelet, and heparin bridging), and endoscopies (polyp number, location, size, morphology, histopathology, resection method and prophylactic clipping). Propensity-score models with inverse probability of treatment weighting were developed between prophylactic clipping and no clipping groups. Unbalanced variables were included in a doubly robust model with multivariate analysis. The primary outcome was clinically significant delayed PPB, defined as a composite endpoint of hemoglobin drop ≥2 g/dL, blood transfusion, or repeat colonoscopy for hemostasis within 30 days. RESULTS Five hundred forty-seven patients with 1485 polyps were included. Prophylactic clipping was not associated with a reduced risk of PPB (odds ratio [OR], 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], .73-1.95; P = .497). The hot resection method was associated with a significantly higher risk of PPB (OR, 9.76; 95% CI, 3.94-32.60; P < .001) compared with cold biopsy or snare polypectomy. In a subgroup analysis, prophylactic clipping was associated with a lower PPB risk in patients on DOACs (OR, .36; 95% CI, .16-.82; P = .015). CONCLUSIONS Prophylactic clipping was not associated with an overall reduced risk of PPB in patients on oral anticoagulants. The use of cold snare polypectomy should be maximized in anticoagulated patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis H S Lau
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Institute of Digestive Diseases, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Cosmos L T Guo
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Joyce K K Lee
- Institute of Digestive Diseases, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Clive S T Chan
- Institute of Digestive Diseases, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Joyce W Y Mak
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Institute of Digestive Diseases, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Sunny H Wong
- Institute of Digestive Diseases, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Terry C F Yip
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Institute of Digestive Diseases, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Medical Data Analytic Centre (MDAC), Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Grace L H Wong
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Institute of Digestive Diseases, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Medical Data Analytic Centre (MDAC), Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Vincent W S Wong
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Institute of Digestive Diseases, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Medical Data Analytic Centre (MDAC), Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Francis K L Chan
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Institute of Digestive Diseases, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Raymond S Y Tang
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Institute of Digestive Diseases, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Clip Closure Does Not Reduce Risk of Bleeding After Resection of Large Serrated Polyps: Results From a Randomized Trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20:1757-1765.e4. [PMID: 34971811 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.12.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Revised: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Serrated polyps are important colorectal cancer precursors and are most commonly located in the proximal colon, where post-polypectomy bleeding rates are higher. There is limited clinical trial evidence to guide best practices for resection of large serrated polyps (LSPs). METHODS In a multicenter trial, patients with large (≥20 mm) non-pedunculated polyps undergoing endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) were randomized to clipping of the resection base or no clipping. This analysis is stratified by histologic subtype of study polyp(s), categorized as serrated [sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) or hyperplastic polyps (HPs)] or adenomatous, comparing clip vs control groups. The primary outcome was severe post-procedure bleeding within 30 days of colonoscopy. RESULTS A total of 179 participants with 199 LSPs (191 SSLs and 8 HPs) and 730 participants with 771 adenomatous polyps were included in the study. Overall, 5 patients with LSPs (2.8%) experienced post-procedure bleeding compared with 42 (5.8%) of those with adenomas. There was no difference in post-procedure bleeding rates between patients in the clip vs control group among those with LSPs (2.3% vs 3.3%, respectively, difference 1.0%; P = NS). However, among those with adenomatous polyps, clipping was associated with a lower risk of post-procedure bleeding (3.9% vs 7.6%, difference 3.7%; P = .03) and overall serious adverse events (5.5% vs 10.6%, difference 5.1%; P = .01). CONCLUSION The post-procedure bleeding risk for LSPs removed via EMR is low, and there is no discernable benefit of prophylactic clipping of the resection base in this group. This study indicates that the benefit of endoscopic clipping following EMR may be specific for >2 cm adenomatous polyps located in the proximal colon. CLINICALTRIALS gov, Number: NCT01936948.
Collapse
|
38
|
Anticoagulation Resumption After Colonic Polypectomy: Predicting Prime Post-procedural Timing. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 67:2708-2710. [PMID: 35048225 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-021-07349-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
|
39
|
Preventing Postendoscopic Mucosal Resection Bleeding of Large Nonpedunculated Colorectal Lesions. Am J Gastroenterol 2022; 117:1080-1088. [PMID: 35765907 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The most common major adverse event of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is clinically significant post-EMR bleeding (CSPEB), with an incidence of 6%-7% in large lesions. Repeat colonoscopy, blood transfusions, or other interventions are often needed. The associated direct costs are much higher than those of an uncomplicated EMR. In this review, we discuss the aspects related to CSPEB of large nonpedunculated polyps, such as risk factors, predictive models, and prophylactic measures, and we highlight evidence for preventive treatment options and explore new methods for bleeding prophylaxis. We also provide recommendations for steps that can be taken before, during, and after EMR to minimize bleeding risk. Finally, this review proposes future directions to reduce CSPEB incidence.
Collapse
|
40
|
Whitfield AM, Burgess NG, Bahin FF, Kabir S, Pellisé M, Sonson R, Subramanian V, Mahajan H, McLeod D, Byth K, Bourke MJ. Histopathological effects of electrosurgical interventions in an in vivo porcine model of colonic endoscopic mucosal resection. Gut 2022; 71:864-870. [PMID: 34172512 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-324140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) in the colon has been widely adopted, but there is limited data on the histopathological effects of the differing electrosurgical currents (ESCs) used. We used an in vivo porcine model to compare the tissue effects of ESCs for snare resection and adjuvant margin ablation techniques. DESIGN Standardised EMR was performed by a single endoscopist in 12 pigs. Two intersecting 15 mm snare resections were performed. Resections were randomised 1:1 using either a microprocessor-controlled current (MCC) or low-power coagulating current (LPCC). The lateral margins of each defect were treated with either argon plasma coagulation (APC) or snare tip soft coagulation (STSC). Colons were surgically removed at 72 hours. Two specialist pathologists blinded to the intervention assessed the specimens. RESULTS 88 defects were analysed (median 7 per pig, median defect size 29×17 mm). For snare ESC effects, 156 tissue sections were assessed. LPCC was comparable to MCC for deep involvement of the colon wall. For margin ablation, 172 tissue sections were assessed. APC was comparable to STSC for deep involvement of the colon wall. Islands of preserved mucosa at the coagulated margin were more likely with APC compared with STSC (16% vs 5%, p=0.010). CONCLUSION For snare resection, MCC and LPCC did not produce significantly different tissue effects. The submucosal injectate may protect the underlying tissue, and technique may more strongly dictate the depth and extent of final injury. For margin ablation, APC was less uniform and complete compared with STSC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony M Whitfield
- Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicholas G Burgess
- Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Farzan F Bahin
- Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sharir Kabir
- Department of General Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - María Pellisé
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rebecca Sonson
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Vishnu Subramanian
- Department of General Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hema Mahajan
- Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Duncan McLeod
- Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Karen Byth
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,WSLHD Research and Education Network, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia .,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Van der Voort VRH, Moons LMG, de Graaf W, Schrauwen RWM, Hazen WL, Seerden TCJ, Vleggaar FP, Didden P. Efficacy and safety of cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of nonlifting colorectal polyps. Endoscopy 2022; 54:509-514. [PMID: 34521120 DOI: 10.1055/a-1559-2391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND : Suboptimal lifting increases complexity of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for benign colorectal polyps. Cap-assisted EMR (EMR-C) may allow fibrotic polyp tissue to be captured in the snare. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of EMR-C for benign nonlifting colorectal polyps. METHODS : This was a multicenter study, which prospectively registered all EMR-C procedures (2016-2018) for presumed benign nonlifting colorectal polyps. RESULTS : 70 nonlifting polyps with a median size of 25 mm (interquartile range [IQR] 15-40) were treated with EMR-C. Complete polyp removal was achieved in 68 (97.1 %), including 47 (67.1 %) with EMR-C alone. Overall, 66 polyps showed benign histology, and endoscopic follow-up after a median of 6 months (IQR 6-10) showed recurrence in 19.7 %. First (n = 10) and second (n = 2) benign recurrences were all treated endoscopically. Deep mural injury type III-V occurred in 7.4 % and was treated successfully with clips. CONCLUSION : EMR-C may be an alternative therapeutic option for removal of benign nonlifting polyp tissue. Although recurrence still occurs, repeat endoscopic therapy usually leads to complete polyp clearance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Leon M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Wilmar de Graaf
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ruud W M Schrauwen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Bernhoven Hospital, Uden, Netherlands
| | - Wouter L Hazen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Elisabeth-Twee Steden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands
| | - Tom C J Seerden
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands
| | - Frank P Vleggaar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Paul Didden
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Risk of post-polypectomy bleeding after endoscopic mucosal resection in patients receiving antiplatelet medication: comparison between the continue and hold groups. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:6410-6418. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08987-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
43
|
Patient Selection, Risks, and Long-Term Outcomes Associated with Colorectal Polyp Resection. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2022; 32:351-370. [PMID: 35361340 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2021.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
The 2 most significant complications of colonoscopy with polypectomy are bleeding and perforation. Although the incidence rates are generally low (<1%), these can be avoided by recognizing pertinent risk factors, which can be patient, polyp, and technique/device related. Endoscopists should be equipped to manage bleeding and perforation. Currently available devices and techniques to achieve hemostasis and manage colon perforations are reviewed.
Collapse
|
44
|
Kwok K, Tran T, Lew D. Polypectomy for Large Polyps with Endoscopic Mucosal Resection. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2022; 32:259-276. [PMID: 35361335 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2021.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Beginning in 1955, when the saline injection was first described to prevent transmural injury during polyp fulguration, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) has grown exponentially, both in scope and in practice. Because EMR is an organ-preserving technique even for large polyps, this allows for comparable outcomes to surgery, but substantially improved cost savings and significantly reduced morbidity and mortality. To achieve this, however, one must master the 4 fundamental components that are critical to the success of EMR- time, team, tools, and technique. This article aims to provide a compendium of state of the art updates within the field of endoluminal resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karl Kwok
- Interventional Endoscopy, Division of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente, Los Angeles Medical Center, 1526 North Edgemont Street, 7th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90027, USA.
| | - Tri Tran
- Department of Medicine, Kaiser Permanente, Los Angeles Medical Center, 4867 W Sunset Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90027, USA
| | - Daniel Lew
- Division of Gastroenterology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Castillo-Regalado E, Uchima H. Endoscopic management of difficult laterally spreading tumors in colorectum. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 14:113-128. [PMID: 35432746 PMCID: PMC8984535 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i3.113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Due to the advent of the screening programs for colorectal cancer and the era of quality assurance colonoscopy the number the polyps that can be considered difficult, including large (> 20 mm) laterally spreading tumors (LSTs), has increased in the last decade. All LSTs should be assessed carefully, looking for suspicious areas of submucosal invasion (SMI), such as nodules or depressed areas, describing the morphology according to the Paris classification, the pit pattern, and vascular pattern. The simplest, most appropriate and safest endoscopic treatment with curative intent should be selected. For LST-granular homogeneous type, piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection should be the first option due to its biological low risk of SMI. LST-nongranular pseudodepressed type has an increased risk of SMI, and en bloc resection should be mandatory. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection is useful in situations where submucosal injection alters the operative field, e.g., for the resection of scar lesions, with no lifting, adjacent tattoo, incomplete resection attempts, lesions into a colonic diverticulum, in ileocecal valve and lesions with intra-appendicular involvement. Endoscopic full thickness resection is very useful for the treatment of difficult to resect lesions of less than 20 up to 25 mm. Among the indications, we highlight the treatment of polyps with suspected malignancy because the acquired tissue allows an exact histologic risk stratification to assign patients individually to the best treatment and avoid surgery for low-risk lesions. Endoscopic submucosal dissection is the only endoscopic procedure that allows completes en bloc resection regardless of the size of the lesion. It should therefore be indicated in the treatment of lesions with risk of SMI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edgar Castillo-Regalado
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona 08916, Spain
- Endoscopic Unit, Creu Groga Medical Center, Calella 08370, Spain
| | - Hugo Uchima
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona 08916, Spain
- Endoscopic Unit, Teknon Medical Center, Barcelona 08022, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Oh CK, Cho YW, Choi IH, Lee HH, Lim CH, Kim JS, Lee BI, Cho YS. Comparison of precutting endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for large (20-30 mm) flat colorectal lesions. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 37:568-575. [PMID: 34845766 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM The complete and safe removal of large (≥ 20 mm) colorectal lesions is an area of concern. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) effectively removes these lesions compared with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). However, ESD requires advanced techniques, longer procedure time, and high cost. Precutting EMR (EMR-P) is a modified EMR method that overcomes the limitations of EMR. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of EMR-P and ESD in large (20-30 mm) flat colorectal lesions. METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of cases in which 20- to 30-mm flat colorectal lesions were resected at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital from January 2014 to December 2019. Propensity score matching was performed to control for possible confounders. RESULTS Two hundred and ninety-nine patients were included in this study. After matching, 90 patients were assigned to each group. There were no significant difference in complete resection rates (92.2% vs 92.2%, P = 1.000), en bloc resection rates (95.6% vs 97.8%, P = 0.682), and mean size of lesions (22.9 ± 3.1 mm vs 23.0 ± 3.1 mm, P = 0.867) between EMR-P and ESD. Procedure time was significantly shorter with EMR-P (11.0 ± 6.5 min vs 37.0 ± 19.3 min, P < 0.001). The adverse events rate was not significantly different between both groups. No local recurrence occurred in both groups. CONCLUSIONS Precutting EMR was not significantly different to ESD in terms of complete resection rate and en bloc resection rate for 20- to 30-mm flat colorectal lesions without fibrosis. Furthermore, EMR-P has shorter procedure time than ESD. EMR-P could be considered one of standard treatments for large flat colorectal lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chang Kyo Oh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Young Wook Cho
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - In Hyoung Choi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Han Hee Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Chul-Hyun Lim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jin Su Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Bo-In Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Young-Seok Cho
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Rashid MU, Alomari M, Afraz S, Erim T. EMR and ESD: Indications, techniques and results. Surg Oncol 2022; 43:101742. [DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
48
|
Turan AS, Pohl H, Matsumoto M, Lee BS, Aizawa M, Desideri F, Albéniz E, Raju GS, Luba D, Barret M, Gurudu SR, Ramirez FC, Lin WR, Atsma F, Siersema PD, van Geenen EJM. The Role of Clips in Preventing Delayed Bleeding After Colorectal Polyp Resection: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20:362-371.e23. [PMID: 33991691 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Nonpedunculated colorectal polyps are normally endoscopically removed to prevent neoplastic progression. Delayed bleeding is the most common major adverse event. Clipping the resection defect has been suggested to reduce delayed bleedings. Our aim was to determine if prophylactic clipping reduces delayed bleedings and to analyze the contribution of polyp characteristics, extent of defect closure, and antithrombotic use. METHODS An individual patient data meta-analysis was performed. Studies on prophylactic clipping in nonpedunculated colorectal polyps were selected from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane database (last selection, April 2020). Authors were invited to share original study data. The primary outcome was delayed bleeding ≤30 days. Multivariable mixed models were used to determine the efficacy of prophylactic clipping in various subgroups adjusted for confounders. RESULTS Data of 5380 patients with 8948 resected polyps were included from 3 randomized controlled trials, 2 prospective, and 8 retrospective studies. Prophylactic clipping reduced delayed bleeding in proximal polyps ≥20 mm (odds ratio [OR], 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.88; number needed to treat = 32), especially with antithrombotics (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.35-0.99; number needed to treat = 23; subgroup of anticoagulants/double platelet inhibitors: n = 226; OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.16-1.01; number needed to treat = 12). Prophylactic clipping did not benefit distal polyps ≥20 mm with antithrombotics (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.79-2.52). CONCLUSIONS Prophylactic clipping reduces delayed bleeding after resection of nonpedunculated, proximal colorectal polyps ≥20 mm, especially in patients using antithrombotics. No benefit was found for distal polyps. Based on this study, patients can be identified who may benefit from prophylactic clipping. (PROSPERO registration number CRD42020104317.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayla S Turan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Heiko Pohl
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, VA White River Junction, White River Junction, Vermont
| | - Mio Matsumoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sapporo Medical Center NTT EC, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Brian S Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, California
| | - Masato Aizawa
- Department of Coloproctology, Aizu Medical Center Fukushima Medical University, Aizuwakamatsu, Japan
| | - Federico Desideri
- Digestive and Liver Disease Department, Endoscopy Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Gastroenterology Department, San Maurizio Hospital, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Eduardo Albéniz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Navarrabiomed Biomedical Research Center, UPNA, IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | - Daniel Luba
- Monterey Bay Gastroenterology Consultants, Monterey, California
| | - Maximilien Barret
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Wey-Ran Lin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Femke Atsma
- Department of IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Erwin J M van Geenen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Guan H, Zeng C, Chen Y. Letter to editor: piecemeal cold snare polypectomy versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large sessile serrated lesions. Gut 2022; 71:440. [PMID: 33827782 PMCID: PMC8762034 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-324531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Revised: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Haiying Guan
- Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Chunyan Zeng
- Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Youxiang Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Polypectomy, Endoscopic Mucosal Resection, and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in the Cirrhotic Population. Clin Liver Dis 2022; 26:13-19. [PMID: 34802659 DOI: 10.1016/j.cld.2021.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Endoscopic mucosal resection and dissection are advanced endoscopic procedures that have proven essential for resecting premalignant and early malignant lesions throughout the gastrointestinal tract. Over time, these procedures have proven to play a key role in avoiding more invasive surgical approaches and thus decrease overall mortality. However, the success of these procedures does come with a slightly increased risk of adverse events such as bleeding and perforation. In this article, we review the literature for reported adverse events, specifically in the cirrhotic population. This article also discusses experts' opinions on approaches taken to perform these procedures with acceptable risks.
Collapse
|