Low Rates of Linkage and Retention Into Care Among Patients With Chronic HBV Infection

Enhancing linkage to care for hepatitis B, D, and C patients: A retrospective-prospective study

BACKGROUND

The WHO has set a goal to decrease viral hepatitis-related fatalities by 65% by 2030.

AIMS

To locate and retrieve to care all individuals diagnosed with hepatitis B, D or C, and investigate why they were not linked to appropriate medical management.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective-prospective search for patients with hepatitis B, D or C virus (HBV, HDV and HCV) infection in the central laboratory database of the Barcelona northern health area (catchment population, 450,000). We reviewed records and contacted candidates for retrieval who were offered a specialist medical visit.

RESULTS

We reviewed records of 3731 patients with viral hepatitis (January 2019-December 2022): 1763 HBsAg+, 69 anti-HDV+ and 1899 HCV-RNA+. Among these, 644 (37%) HBV, 20 (29%) HDV and 1116 (56%) HCV patients were not currently linked to care. The proportion of patients receiving appropriate care was higher in HBV and HDV (p < 0.0001), and a higher percentage of unlinked hepatitis C patients had low life expectancy/comorbidities (39%; p < 0.0001). After implementing the linkage strategy, 254 HBV, 16 HDV and 54 HCV patients were successfully reintegrated into care. Among 1780 patients requiring linkage, 638 (35.8%) had moved to another health area or were missing essential contact data.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with viral hepatitis who required appropriate specialist care and were eligible for contact, 64% with HBV, 100% with HDV and 27% with HCV were successfully reintegrated into care. Overall, 324 (47.2%) eligible patients were linked to care, indicating the success of this strategy.

Characterization of Individuals With Hepatitis B Virus-Related Cirrhosis in a Large Integrated Health Care Organization, 2008-2019

CONTEXT

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB), caused by hepatitis B virus (HBV), is a risk factor for cirrhosis. The management of HBV-related cirrhosis is challenging, with guidelines recommending treatment initiation and regular monitoring for those affected.

OBJECTIVE

Our study characterized Kaiser Permanente Southern California patients with HBV-related cirrhosis and assessed whether they received recommended laboratory testing and imaging monitoring.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

We identified KPSC members aged ≥18 years with CHB (defined by 2, consecutive positive hepatitis B surface antigens ≥6 months apart) from 2008 to 2019. Of these patients, we further identified patients with potential HBV-related cirrhosis through ICD-10 code diagnosis, adjudicated via chart review.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Age, race/ethnicity, laboratory tests (eg, alanine aminotransferase [ALT]), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening (based on standard screening recommendations via imaging) were described in those with HBV-related cirrhosis versus those without.

RESULTS

Among patients with CHB, we identified 65 patients with HBV-related cirrhosis over ~8 years. Diabetes was the most common comorbidity and was approximately 3 times more prevalent among patients with cirrhosis compared to patients without cirrhosis (21.5% vs. 7.1%). Of the 65 patients with cirrhosis, 72.3% (N = 47) received treatment. Generally, we observed that liver function tests (eg, ALT) were completed frequently in this population, with patients completing a median of 10 (6, 16) tests/year. All patients with cirrhosis had ≥1 ALT completed over the study period, and almost all cirrhotic patients (N = 64; 98.5%) had ≥1 HBV DNA test. However, the proportion of yearly imaging visits completed varied across the study years, between 64.0% in 2012 and 87.5% in 2009; overall, 35% (N = 23) completed annual imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that among patients with HBV-related cirrhosis, at the patient-level, completed imaging orders for HCC screening were sub-optimal. However, we observed adequate disease management practices through frequent liver function tests, linkage to specialty care, image ordering, and shared EHR between KPSC providers.

Association of Baseline Hepatitis B Virus DNA and On-Treatment Risk of Cirrhosis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background

Recent studies suggest an inverse relationship between baseline levels of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA and on-treatment risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). However, data are limited to Asian cohorts, and it is unclear if similar associations hold true for non-Asians with CHB. We aimed to evaluate association of baseline HBV DNA with long-term risks of cirrhosis and HCC among a predominantly non-Asian cohort of CHB patients in the USA.

Methods

Using longitudinal data from the national Veterans Affairs database, we evaluated the risk of cirrhosis or HCC among adults with non-cirrhotic CHB who are on continuous antiviral therapy, stratified by moderate levels of baseline HBV DNA (4.00 - 6.99 log10 IU/mL) vs. high levels of baseline HBV DNA (7.00 log10 IU/mL or higher). Propensity score weighting was applied, and competing risks cumulative incidence functions and Cox proportional hazards models were utilized.

Results

Among 1,129 non-cirrhotic CHB patients (41% non-Hispanic White, 36% African American, mean age 57.0 years, 62.2% hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positive), 585 had moderate levels of baseline HBV DNA and 544 had high HBV DNA. After propensity score weighting, no significant difference in risk of cirrhosis was observed between moderate vs. high baseline HBV DNA (4.55 vs. 5.22 per 100 person-years, hazard ratio (HR): 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.69 - 1.09, P = 0.22), but risk of HCC was significantly higher in patients with moderate vs. high baseline HBV DNA (0.84 vs. 0.69 per 100 person-years, HR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.09 - 1.62, P < 0.01).

Conclusions

Among a national cohort of predominantly non-Asian US veterans with non-cirrhotic CHB on antiviral therapy, moderate levels of baseline HBV DNA was associated with higher risk of HCC than high HBV DNA.

Assessing the rate of non-linkage to care and identifying barriers in individuals living with hepatitis B. Results of the LINK-B study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Hepatitis B infection is the most frequent cause of chronic hepatitis and liver cancer worldwide. Active searching for individuals with chronic hepatitis B has been proposed as a strategy to achieve the elimination of this virus. The primary aim of this study was to link to specialists HBsAg-positive individuals detected in a laboratory database and to characterize individuals who were not linked to care.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective-prospective evaluation of all HBsAg-positive serum samples identified in the central laboratory of the Northern Barcelona area between January 2018 and June 2022. After reviewing the patients' clinical charts, all those not linked to care were given an appointment with a specialist.

RESULTS

Medical records of 2765 different HBsAg-positive serum samples were reviewed and 2590 individuals were identified: 844 (32.6%) were not linked to a specialist, 653 were candidates for linkage, and 344 attended the specialist visit. The two main reasons why they were not under specialist care were administrative issues, such as living in another region (12.1%) and lacking contact details (4.1%), and low life expectancy (2.8%). Individuals who did not attend their scheduled visit were mainly young [38.1 ± 12.9 vs. 44.0 ± 14.0 (p < .001)], non-White European [75.3% vs. 58.1% (p < .001)] and men [70.7% vs. 56.4% (p < .001)].

CONCLUSIONS

One in every three HBsAg-positive individuals in our setting was not currently under specialist care. Of particular note, half of them had never attended a specialist consultation, an essential step for evaluating the disease and starting therapy in some countries.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) screening, linkage and retention-in-care in inclusion health populations: Evaluation of an outreach screening programme in London

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated a hepatitis B virus (HBV) screening programme, delivered by a specialist pan-London multidisciplinary outreach team, to understand population characteristics and care cascade among people who experience extreme social exclusion (Inclusion Health (IH) groups).

METHODS

Point-of-care HBV screening was performed in temporary accommodation for people experiencing homelessness (PEH) and people seeking asylum (initial accommodation centres, IACs) via a mobile unit staffed by peers with lived experience, nurses, and doctors. We analysed demographics and HBV characteristics of adults screened between May 2020 and January 2022. We ascertained linkage-to-care (LTC), retention-in-care (RIC) and loss-to-follow-up (LTFU). People LTFU were contacted by peers to re-engage in care.

RESULTS

2473 people were screened: 809 in IACs, 1664 in other temporary accommodation. Overall hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) prevalence was 1.7% (43/2473), highest in IACs (3.5%, 28/809). LTC within 3 months was 56% (24/43) and RIC, 87% (26/30). LTC was higher when referred to a local IH-specialist hepatitis service, compared to other services (77%, 17/22 vs 33%, 7/21; p = 0.006). LTFU was 30% (13/43), reduced to 21% (9/43) after intervention by peers.

CONCLUSION

Our findings support outreach screening among IH populations and peer-supported linkage to IH-specialist hepatitis services. We recommend increased HBV testing and HBV-specific IH specialist services.

On-treatment risks of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma among a large cohort of predominantly non-Asian patients with non-cirrhotic chronic hepatitis B

Background & Aims

The vast majority of studies evaluating differences in on-treatment risks of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) have been conducted in Asia. Data on the course of CHB on antiviral therapy among predominantly non-Asian populations is less well described. We aimed to evaluate overall risks of cirrhosis and HCC and the influence of baseline factors on this risk among a predominantly non-Asian cohort of patients with CHB in the US.

Methods

Using longitudinal data from the national Veterans Affairs database, we evaluated the incidence of cirrhosis or HCC among adults with non-cirrhotic CHB on continuous antiviral therapy. Cumulative incidence functions and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models employed competing risks methods and evaluated overall risk and predictors of developing cirrhosis or HCC while on treatment.

Results

Among 2,496 patients with non-cirrhotic CHB (39.1% African American, 38.4% non-Hispanic White, 18.8% Asian, mean age 58.0 ± 13.4 years), the overall incidences of cirrhosis and HCC were 3.99 per 100 person-years (95% CI 3.66-4.35) and 0.43 per 100 person-years (95% CI 0.33-0.54), respectively. The highest incidences of cirrhosis and HCC were observed in non-Hispanic White patients (5.74 and 0.52 per 100 person-years, respectively), which were significantly higher than in Asian patients (1.93 and 0.17 per 100 person-years, respectively, p <0.0001). On multivariate regression, only baseline FIB-4 score was consistently associated with long-term risk of cirrhosis or HCC.

Conclusions

Using a longitudinal cohort of predominantly non-Asian Veterans with non-cirrhotic CHB on antiviral therapy (an understudied population), we provide important epidemiological data to describe long-term risks of cirrhosis and HCC.

Impact and implications

In one of the largest studies to date of a predominantly non-Asian cohort of patients with non-cirrhotic chronic hepatitis B, we provide important epidemiological data describing the long-term risks of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma among patients on antiviral therapies. Among this understudied population, the overall incidence of cirrhosis was 3.99 per 100-person-years (95% CI 3.66-4.35) and of HCC was 0.43 per 100-person-years (95% CI 0.33-0.54). These data also emphasize the importance of continued monitoring and HCC surveillance among CHB patients who are maintained on antiviral therapies.

A pilot sentinel surveillance system to monitor treatment and treatment outcomes of chronic hepatitis B and C infections in clinical centres in three European countries, 2019

BackgroundThe World Health Organization European Action Plan 2020 targets for the elimination of viral hepatitis are that > 75% of eligible individuals with chronic hepatitis B (HBV) or hepatitis C (HCV) are treated, of whom > 90% achieve viral suppression.AimTo report the results from a pilot sentinel surveillance to monitor chronic HBV and HCV treatment uptake and outcomes in 2019.MethodsWe undertook retrospective enhanced data collection on patients with a confirmed chronic HBV or HCV infection presenting at one of seven clinics in three countries (Croatia, Romania and Spain) for the first time between 1 January 2019 and 30 June 2019. Clinical records were reviewed from date of first attendance to 31 December 2019 and data on sociodemographics, clinical history, laboratory results, treatment and treatment outcomes were collected. Treatment eligibility, uptake and case outcome were assessed.ResultsOf 229 individuals with chronic HBV infection, treatment status was reported for 203 (89%). Of the 80 individuals reported as eligible for treatment, 51% (41/80) were treated of whom 89% (33/37) had achieved viral suppression. Of 240 individuals with chronic HCV infection, treatment status was reported for 231 (96%). Of 231 eligible individuals, 77% (179/231) were treated, the majority of whom had received direct acting antivirals (99%, 174/176) and had achieved sustained virological response (98%, 165/169).ConclusionTreatment targets for global elimination were missed for HBV but not for HCV. A wider European implementation of sentinel surveillance with a representative sample of sites could help monitor progress towards achieving hepatitis control targets.

Viral hepatitis and the cascade of care among people living with HIV in the Asia-Pacific

BACKGROUND

Although the prevalence and mortality of hepatitis is high in the Asia-Pacific region, few studies are available on the diagnosis, treatment, and cure rates for viral hepatitis among people living with HIV in this area. This study aims to report the cascade of care (CoC) for hepatitis B (HBV) and C (HCV) among people living with HIV receiving combined antiretroviral therapy (ART).

METHODS

Patients enrolled in the TREAT Asia HIV Observational Database Low Intensity Transfer (TAHOD-LITE) cohort, on ART, and with follow-up data from 2010 to 2019 were included. Patients were determined as positive for HCV or HBV co-infection if they ever tested positive for HCV antibody (anti-HCV) or HBV surface antigen (HBsAg), respectively.

RESULTS

In total, 39% (8612/22 340) of the adult HIV cohort had undergone HBsAg testing, with 8% (672/8612) testing positive. HBV CoC demonstrated that 71% (474/672) of those with HBsAg positive results initiated treatment, 67% (318/474) of those on treatment had HBV DNA testing to evaluate treatment progression, and 18% (58/318) of those tested reached viral suppression. Of the cohort, 37% (8231/22 340) had anti-HCV testing, of whom 10% (779/8231) tested positive. The HCV CoC showed that 68% (526/779) of those with positive anti-HCV tests had HCV RNA tests, of whom 51% (267/526) had detectable HCV RNA. Among those with detectable HCV RNA, 65% (174/267) initiated HCV treatment. Of the 40% (69/174) who initiated HCV treatment, 90% (62/69) reached sustained virological response.

CONCLUSION

Our findings identified less frequent testing in the healthcare system and limited access to treatment as gaps in the CoC for viral hepatitis. More routine HCV RNA and HBV DNA testing is required for patients with positive screening tests to identify those in need of treatment.

HBV continuum of care using community- and hospital-based screening interventions in Senegal: Results from the PROLIFICA programme

Background & Aims

Strategies to implement HBV screening and treatment are critical to achieve HBV elimination but have been inadequately evaluated in sub-Saharan Africa (sSA).

Methods

We assessed the feasibility of screen-and-treat interventions in 3 real-world settings (community, workplace, and hospital) in Senegal. Adult participants were screened using a rapid HBsAg point-of-care test. The proportion linked to care, the proportion who had complete clinical staging (alanine transaminase [ALT], viral load, and FibroScan®), and the proportion eligible for treatment were compared among the 3 intervention groups.

Results

In 2013-2016, a total of 3,665 individuals were screened for HBsAg in the community (n = 2,153) and in workplaces (n = 1,512); 199/2,153 (9.2%) and 167/1,512 (11%) were HBsAg-positive in the community and workplaces, respectively. In the hospital setting (outpatient clinics), 638 HBsAg-positive participants were enrolled in the study. All infected participants were treatment naïve. Linkage to care was similar among community-based (69.9%), workplace-based (69.5%), and hospital-based interventions (72.6%, p = 0.617). Of HBV-infected participants successfully linked to care, full clinical staging was obtained in 47.5% (66/139), 59.5% (69/116), and 71.1% (329/463) from the community, workplaces, and hospitals, respectively (p <0.001). The proportion eligible for treatment (EASL criteria) differed among community- (9.1%), workplace- (30.4%), and hospital-based settings (17.6%, p = 0.007). Acceptability of antiviral therapy, adherence, and safety at 1 year were very good.

Conclusions

HBV screen-and-treat interventions are feasible in non-hospital and hospital settings in Senegal. However, the continuum of care is suboptimal owing to limited access to full clinical staging. Improvement in access to diagnostic services is urgently needed in sSA.

Lay summary

Hepatitis B infection is highly endemic in Senegal. Screening for infection can be done outside hospitals, in communities or workplaces. However, the hepatitis B continuum of care is suboptimal in Senegal and needs to be simplified to scale-up diagnosis and treatment coverage.

Cascade of care among hepatitis B patients in Maastricht, the Netherlands, 1996 to 2018

Background & aims

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Low Rates of Hepatitis B Virus Treatment Among Treatment-Eligible Patients in Safety-Net Health Systems

BACKGROUND

Timely initiation of antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis B virus (CHB) reduces risk of disease progression. We evaluate overall treatment rates and predictors of treatment among treatment-eligible safety-net CHB patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated adults with CHB from 2010 to 2018 across 4 large safety-net health systems in the United States. CHB was identified with ICD-9/10 diagnosis coding and confirmed with laboratory data. Treatment eligibility was determined using American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) guidelines. Comparison of CHB treatment rates among treatment-eligible patients were performed using χ2 testing, Kaplan Meier methods and log-rank testing. Adjusted multivariate Cox proportional hazards models evaluated independent predictors of receiving treatment among eligible patients.

RESULTS

Among 5157 CHB patients (54.7% male, 34.6% African American, 22.3% Asian), 46.8% were treatment-eligible during the study period. CHB treatment rates were 48.4% overall and 37.3% among CHB patients without human immunodeficiency virus. Significantly lower odds of treatment were observed in females versus males (odds ratio: 0.40, 95% confidence interval: 0.33-0.49, P<0.001) and patients age 65 years or above versus age below 45 years (odds ratio: 0.68, 95% confidence interval: 0.51-0.92, P=0.012). Conversely, significantly greater odds of treatment were observed in African American and Asians versus non-Hispanic whites, CHB patients with indigent care versus commercially insured patients, and non-English speaking versus English speaking patients.

CONCLUSION

Among a large multicentered, safety-net cohort of CHB patients, 46.8% of treatment-eligible CHB patients overall and 37.3% of treatment-eligible CHB patients without human immunodeficiency virus received antiviral therapy. Improving CHB treatment rates among treatment-eligible patients represents "low hanging fruit," given the clear benefits of antiviral therapy in mitigating disease progression.

Antiviral Therapy Reduces Risk of Cirrhosis in Noncirrhotic HBV Patients Among 4 Urban Safety-Net Health Systems

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the impact of chronic hepatitis B virus infection (CHB) treatment on risk of cirrhosis, liver-related outcomes, and death among a diverse CHB cohort with a large proportion of African Americans.

METHODS

Adults with noncirrhotic CHB without human immunodeficiency virus from 2010 to 2018 were retrospectively evaluated across 4 US safety-net health systems. CHB was identified with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision/Tenth Revision diagnosis coding and confirmatory laboratory data. Propensity-score matching, Kaplan-Meier methods, and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate impact of CHB treatment on risk of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), death, and composite of cirrhosis, HCC, or death.

RESULTS

Among 4,064 CHB patients (51.9% female, 42.0% age <45 years, 31.6% African American, 26.6% Asian, 26.7% Hispanic), 23.2% received CHB antiviral therapy and 76.8% did not. Among the propensity score-matched cohort (428 treated and 428 untreated), CHB treatment was associated with lower risk of cirrhosis (hazards ratio 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.46-0.92, P = 0.015) and composite of cirrhosis, HCC, or death (hazards ratio 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.49-0.94, P = 0.023). Females vs males and African Americans vs non-Hispanic whites had significantly lower risk of cirrhosis. When treatment effects were stratified by age, sex, and ethnicity, the benefits of antiviral therapies in reducing risk of cirrhosis were seen primarily in CHB patients who were females, age <45 years, and of Asian ethnicity.

DISCUSSION

Our propensity score-matched cohort of noncirrhotic CHB patients demonstrated significant reductions in risk of cirrhosis due to CHB treatment.

Epidemiology and Prevention of Tuberculosis and Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection in the United States

Tuberculosis (TB) and chronic hepatitis B virus (CHB) infection can be prevented with treatment and vaccination, respectively. We reviewed epidemiology and guidelines for TB and CHB to inform strategies for reducing United States (U.S.) burden of both infections. Non-U.S.-born, compared to U.S.-born, persons have a 15-, 6-, and 8-fold higher TB incidence and latent TB infection (LTBI) and CHB prevalence, respectively; all infections disproportionately impact non-U.S.-born Asians. TB and CHB each are associated with ~ 10% mortality that results in 7- and 14-years per life lost, respectively. LTBI and CHB have significant gaps in their care cascade as 40% of LTBI and 20% of CHB patients are diagnosed, and 20% of LTBI and CHB diagnosed patients receive treatment. Reducing TB and CHB burden will require healthcare provider-, system-, and policy-level interventions, and increased funding and collaboration between public health departments and healthcare systems.Institutional Review Board Statement: Since this review article did not include primary data on patients and only focused on reviewing published data, approval by an institutional review board was not needed.