1
|
Narasimha S, Chauhan S, Nehaul R, Cummings J, Wright S, Patterson A, Mullins R, Messina W, Zilka B, Kraus A. Improving Fecal Immunochemical Test Collection for Colorectal Cancer Screening During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Fed Pract 2024; 41:S29-S37. [PMID: 38813253 PMCID: PMC11132107 DOI: 10.12788/fp.0455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
Background Colonoscopy is a first-line method for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. However, cost-effective noninvasive tests, such as high-sensitivity guaiac-based fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) and fecal immunochemical test (FIT), are also used. The COVID-19 pandemic had a substantial negative impact on CRC screening rates. The James A. Haley Veterans Affairs Hospital (JAHVAH) continued socially distant CRC screening using FITs, but encountered inefficiencies due to high rates of incorrectly collected FIT samples. A quality improvement (QI) project was conducted to increase correctly collected and testable FIT kits upon initial laboratory submission. Observations The ambulatory QI project sought out root causes for incorrectly returned FITs and proposed Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles based on a series of approved action plans. A multidisciplinary team of laboratory, nursing, administrative, and primary care staff worked together to discover 6 major root causes. Our multipronged PDSA cycle attempted to set up redundant patient reminders, centralize the FIT dispersal process, and make the patient-FIT interface more user-friendly. All PDSA solutions were implemented over 4 months. Lack of collection date was the most common reason for incorrectly returned FIT kits and the focus of PDSA improvements. The rate of FITs with missing collection dates dropped from 24% prior to PDSA to 14% in April 2021. The rate of correctly returned FIT kits rose from 38% before the project to 72% afterwards, surpassing the 20% improvement goal. Conclusions FIT is a useful method for CRC screening that can be particularly helpful when in-person visits are limited, as seen during the COVID-19 pandemic. The increase in demand for FITs during the pandemic revealed process deficiencies and gave JAHVAH an opportunity to improve workflow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sukhjinder Chauhan
- HCA Sunrise Health Graduate Medical Education Consortium, Las Vegas, Nevada
| | - Roger Nehaul
- James A. Haley Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Tampa, Florida
| | | | - Susan Wright
- James A. Haley Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Tampa, Florida
| | | | - Raymond Mullins
- James A. Haley Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - William Messina
- James A. Haley Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Brian Zilka
- James A. Haley Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Ana Kraus
- James A. Haley Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Tampa, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kimura A, Bell-Brown A, Akinsoto N, Wood J, Peck A, Fang V, Issaka RB. Implementing an Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Lessons Learned From an Academic-Community Practice. AJPM FOCUS 2024; 3:100188. [PMID: 38357554 PMCID: PMC10864856 DOI: 10.1016/j.focus.2024.100188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
Introduction The effectiveness of mailed fecal immunochemical test outreach might be enhanced through an organized colorectal cancer screening program, yet published real-world experiences are limited. We synthesized the process of implementing a colorectal cancer screening program that used mailed fecal immunochemical test outreach in a large integrated academic-community practice. Methods Data from a pilot mailed fecal immunochemical test program were shared with healthcare system leadership, which inspired the creation of a cross-institutional organized colorectal cancer screening program. In partnership with a centralized population health team and primary care, we defined (1) the institutional approach to colorectal cancer screening, (2) the target population and method for screening, (3) the team responsible for implementation, (4) the healthcare team responsible for decisions and care, (5) a quality assurance structure, and (6) a method for identifying cancer occurrence. Results The Fred Hutch/UW Medicine Population Health Colorectal Cancer Screening Program began in September 2021. The workflow for mailed fecal immunochemical test outreach included a mailed postcard, a MyChart message from the patient's primary care provider, a fecal immunochemical test kit with a letter signed by the primary care provider and program director, and up to 3 biweekly reminders. Patients without a colonoscopy 3 months after an abnormal fecal immunochemical test result received navigation through the program. In the first program year, we identified 9,719 patients eligible for outreach, and in an intention-to-treat analysis, 32% of patients completed colorectal cancer screening by fecal immunochemical test or colonoscopy. Conclusions Real-world experiences detailing how to implement organized colorectal cancer screening programs might increase adoption. In our experience, broadly disseminating pilot data, early institutional support, robust data management, and strong cross-departmental relationships were critical to successfully implementing a colorectal cancer screening program that benefits all patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Kimura
- Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Ari Bell-Brown
- Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Nkem Akinsoto
- UW Medicine Primary Care and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Jerry Wood
- UW Medicine Primary Care and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Amy Peck
- UW Medicine Primary Care and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Victoria Fang
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Rachel B. Issaka
- Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu PH, Nair RG, Skinner CS, Murphy CC, Kim EJ, Ortiz C, Wang L, Hu E, Lykken JM, Levin TR, Green BB, Hahn EE, Santini N, Halm EA. Unsatisfactory Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Prevalence, Reasons, and Subsequent Testing. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024; 33:215-223. [PMID: 37964449 PMCID: PMC10873102 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-23-0507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is an effective colorectal cancer screening modality. Little is known about prevalence, reasons, and testing after unsatisfactory FIT, or a FIT that cannot be processed by the laboratory due to inadequate stool specimen or incomplete labeling. METHODS Our retrospective cohort study examined unsatisfactory FIT among average-risk individuals aged 50-74 years in a large, integrated, safety-net health system who completed an index FIT from 2010 to 2019. We determined prevalence of unsatisfactory FIT and categorized reasons hierarchically. We used multivariable logistic regression models to identify factors associated with: (i) unsatisfactory FIT; and (ii) subsequent testing within 15 months of the unsatisfactory FIT. RESULTS Of 56,980 individuals completing an index FIT, 10.2% had an unsatisfactory FIT. Reasons included inadequate specimen (51%), incomplete labeling (27%), old specimen (13%), and broken/leaking container (8%). Unsatisfactory FIT was associated with being male [OR, 1.10; confidence interval (CI), 1.03-1.16], Black (OR, 1.46; CI, 1.33-1.61), Spanish speaking (OR, 1.12; CI, 1.01-1.24), on Medicaid (OR, 1.42; CI, 1.28-1.58), and received FIT by mail (OR, 2.66; CI, 2.35-3.01). Among those with an unsatisfactory FIT, fewer than half (41%) completed a subsequent test within 15 months (median, 4.4 months). Adults aged 50-54 years (OR, 1.16; CI, 1.01-1.39) and those who received FIT by mail (OR, 1.92; CI, 1.49-2.09) were more likely to complete a subsequent test. CONCLUSIONS One in ten returned a FIT that could not be processed, mostly due to patient-related reasons. Fewer than half completed a subsequent test after unsatisfactory FIT. IMPACT Screening programs should address these breakdowns such as specimen collection and labeling to improve real-world effectiveness. See related In the Spotlight, p. 183.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Po-Hong Liu
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Rasmi G Nair
- Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Celette Sugg Skinner
- Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Caitlin C Murphy
- School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Eric J Kim
- Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Cynthia Ortiz
- Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Lei Wang
- Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Ellen Hu
- Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Jacquelyn M Lykken
- Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Theodore R Levin
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California
| | - Beverly B Green
- Department of Health System Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, California
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | - Erin E Hahn
- Department of Health System Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, California
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California
| | - Noel Santini
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Parkland Health, Dallas, Texas
| | - Ethan A Halm
- Department of Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick New Jersey
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Toth JF, Trivedi M, Gupta S. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: The Role of Clinical Laboratories. Clin Chem 2024; 70:150-164. [PMID: 38175599 PMCID: PMC10952004 DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvad198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer incidence and mortality. Screening can result in reductions in incidence and mortality, but there are many challenges to uptake and follow-up. CONTENT Here, we will review the changing epidemiology of CRC, including increasing trends for early and later onset CRC; evidence to support current and emerging screening strategies, including noninvasive stool and blood-based tests; key challenges to ensuring uptake and high-quality screening; and the critical role that clinical laboratories can have in supporting health system and public health efforts to reduce the burden of CRC on the population. SUMMARY Clinical laboratories have the opportunity to play a seminal role in optimizing early detection and prevention of CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph F Toth
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Mehul Trivedi
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Samir Gupta
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, United States
- Department of Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, United States
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Patel S, Sewell JL, Bhuket T, Somsouk M. Delivering High-Quality, Efficient Gastroenterology Care to Vulnerable and Underserved Populations: Special Considerations and Possible Solutions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21:3213-3216.e1. [PMID: 37634855 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Shreya Patel
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Division of Gastroenterology, University of California, San Francisco, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California.
| | - Justin L Sewell
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Division of Gastroenterology, University of California, San Francisco, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California
| | - Taft Bhuket
- Department of Medicine, Alameda Health System, Oakland, California; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Alameda Health System, Oakland, California
| | - Ma Somsouk
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Division of Gastroenterology, University of California, San Francisco, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California; Center for Vulnerable Populations, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Paskett ED, Kruse-Diehr AJ, Oliveri JM, Vanderpool RC, Gray DM, Pennell ML, Huang B, Young GS, Fickle D, Cromo M, Katz ML, Reiter PL, Rogers M, Gross DA, Fairchild V, Xu W, Carman A, Walunis JM, McAlearney AS, Huerta TR, Rahurkar S, Biederman E, Dignan M. Accelerating Colorectal Cancer Screening and Follow-up through Implementation Science (ACCSIS) in Appalachia: protocol for a group randomized, delayed intervention trial. Transl Behav Med 2023; 13:748-756. [PMID: 37202831 PMCID: PMC10538475 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibad017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Appalachian regions of Kentucky and Ohio are hotspots for colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality in the USA. Screening reduces CRC incidence and mortality; however, screening uptake is needed, especially in these underserved geographic areas. Implementation science offers strategies to address this challenge. The aim of the current study was to conduct multi-site, transdisciplinary research to evaluate and improve CRC screening processes using implementation science strategies. The study consists of two phases (Planning and Implementation). In the Planning Phase, a multilevel assessment of 12 health centers (HC) (one HC from each of the 12 Appalachian counties) was conducted by interviewing key informants, creating community profiles, identifying HC and community champions, and performing HC data inventories. Two designated pilot HCs chose CRC evidence-based interventions to adapt and implement at each level (i.e., patient, provider, HC, and community) with evaluation relative to two matched control HCs. During the Implementation Phase, study staff will repeat the rollout process in HC and community settings in a randomized, staggered fashion in the remaining eight counties/HCs. Evaluation will include analyses of electronic health record data and provider and county surveys. Rural HCs have been reluctant to participate in research because of concerns about capacity; however, this project should demonstrate that research does not need to be burdensome and can adapt to local needs and HC abilities. If effective, this approach could be disseminated to HC and community partners throughout Appalachia to encourage the uptake of effective interventions to reduce the burden of CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Electra D Paskett
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Aaron J Kruse-Diehr
- University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
- University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention and Control Research Program, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Jill M Oliveri
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Robin C Vanderpool
- University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Darrell M Gray
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Michael L Pennell
- The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Division of Biostatistics, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Bin Huang
- University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Division of Biostatistics, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource Facility, Lexington, KY, USA
| | | | - Darla Fickle
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Mark Cromo
- University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Mira L Katz
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Division of Health Behavior and Health Promotion, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Paul L Reiter
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Division of Health Behavior and Health Promotion, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Melinda Rogers
- University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Community Impact Office, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - David A Gross
- Northeast Kentucky Area Health Education Center, Morehead, KY, USA
| | - Vickie Fairchild
- Northeast Kentucky Area Health Education Center, Morehead, KY, USA
| | - Wendy Xu
- The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Division of Health Services Management and Policy, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Angela Carman
- University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention and Control Research Program, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Jean M Walunis
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Ann Scheck McAlearney
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Division of Health Services Management and Policy, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Timothy R Huerta
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Division of Health Services Management and Policy, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - Erika Biederman
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Mark Dignan
- University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Arena L, Soloe C, Schlueter D, Ferriola-Bruckenstein K, DeGroff A, Tangka F, Hoover S, Melillo S, Subramanian S. Modifications in Primary Care Clinics to Continue Colorectal Cancer Screening Promotion During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Community Health 2023; 48:113-126. [PMID: 36308666 PMCID: PMC9617236 DOI: 10.1007/s10900-022-01154-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
COVID-19 caused significant declines in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Health systems and clinics, faced with a new rapidly spreading infectious disease, adapted to maintain patient safety and address the effects of the pandemic on healthcare delivery. This study aimed to understand how CDC-funded Colorectal Cancer Control Program recipients and their partner health systems and clinics may have modified evidence-based intervention (EBI) implementation to promote CRC screening during the COVID-19 pandemic; to identify barriers and facilitators to implementing modifications; and to extract lessons that can be applied to support CRC screening, chronic disease management, and clinic resilience in the face of future public health crises. Nine recipients were selected to reflect the diversity inherent among all CRCCP recipients. Recipient and clinic partner staff answered unique sets of pre-interview questions to inform tailoring of interview guides that were developed using constructs from the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based Implementation Strategies (FRAME-IS) and Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). The study team then interviewed recipient, health system, and clinic partner staff incorporating pre-interview responses to focus each conversation. We employed a rapid qualitative analysis approach then conducted virtual focus groups with recipient representatives to validate emergent themes. Three modifications that emerged from thematic analysis include: (1) offering mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) kits for CRC screening with mail or drop off return; (2) increasing the use of patient education and engagement strategies; and (3) increasing the use of or improving automated patient messaging systems. With improved tracking and automated reminder systems, mailed FIT kits paired with tailored patient education and clear instructions for completing the test could help primary care clinics catch up on the backlog of missed screenings during COVID-19. Future research can assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of offering mailed FIT kits on maintaining or improving CRC screening, especially among people who are medically underserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Arena
- RTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Road, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA.
| | - Cindy Soloe
- RTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Road, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 USA
| | - Dara Schlueter
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA USA
| | | | - Amy DeGroff
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - Florence Tangka
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - Sonja Hoover
- RTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Road, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 USA
| | - Stephanie Melillo
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - Sujha Subramanian
- RTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Road, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Daly JM, Xu Y, Crockett SD, Schmidt ME, Kim P, Levy BT. Clock-Drawing Test as a Screening Tool for Cognitive Impairment Associated With Fecal Immunochemical Test Collection Errors. Ann Fam Med 2022; 20:452-459. [PMID: 36228064 PMCID: PMC9512558 DOI: 10.1370/afm.2855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Revised: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purposes of this study were to determine if (1) certain demographic characteristics (potential predictors) of participants, and (2) clock-drawing test results (as a screening test for cognitive impairment) were associated with fecal immunochemical test (FIT) sample collection errors. METHODS Patients scheduled for an upcoming colonoscopy were asked to collect stool samples using 5 different FITs. Patients completed a questionnaire that included the clock-drawing test. Errors included mistakes or omissions in recording the stool collection date and errors in stool collection. Each clock drawing was scored by 2 reviewers using 2 established methods. RESULTS Of the 1,448 participants with a clock drawing, 63% were female with a mean age of 63 years. In this population there were 83% White, 6% Black, and 24% Hispanic persons. Cognitive impairment was found in 292 patients by the Mendes-Santos method. Kappa coefficient for the 2 clock-drawing scores was 0.79 (P <.001). The multivariable generalized linear mixed model for FIT collection errors indicated being female (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.64; 95% CI, 1.09-2.48), having an 8th grade or less education (AOR, 3.40; 95% CI, 1.87-6.18), and having an abnormal Mendes-Santos method clock score (AOR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.08-2.54) were associated with significantly more errors. CONCLUSION Among the participants who do not have dementia, FIT collection errors were made not only by those who had abnormal clock drawing, but also, by those with normal clock drawings. Subjects being female, having 8th grade education or less, and having an abnormal clock drawing scored by Mendes-Santos's method were associated with FIT collection errors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanette M Daly
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Yinghui Xu
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Seth D Crockett
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Megan E Schmidt
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Peter Kim
- Genesis Family Medicine Residency Program, Davenport, Iowa
| | - Barcey T Levy
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.,Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.,Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hiatt RA, Sibley A, Venkatesh B, Cheng J, Dixit N, Fox R, Ling P, Nguyen T, Oh D, Palmer NR, Pasick RJ, Potter MB, Somsouk M, Vargas RA, Vijayaraghavan M, Ashworth A. From Cancer Epidemiology to Policy and Practice: the Role of a Comprehensive Cancer Center. CURR EPIDEMIOL REP 2022; 9:10-21. [PMID: 35342686 PMCID: PMC8935108 DOI: 10.1007/s40471-021-00280-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Purpose of Review Cancer incidence and mortality are decreasing, but inequities in outcomes persist. This paper describes the San Francisco Cancer Initiative (SF CAN) as a model for the systematic application of epidemiological evidence to reduce the cancer burden and associated inequities. Recent Findings SF CAN is a multi-institutional implementation of existing evidence on the prevention and early detection of five common cancers (i.e., breast, prostate, colorectal, liver, and lung/tobacco-related cancers) accounting for 50% of cancer deaths in San Francisco. Five Task Forces follow individual logic models designating inputs, outputs, and outcomes. We describe the progress made and the challenges faced by each Task Force after 5 years of activity. Summary SF CAN is a model for how the nation’s Comprehensive Cancer Centers are ideally positioned to leverage cancer epidemiology for evidence-based initiatives that, along with genuine community engagement and multiple stakeholders, can reduce the population burden of cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert A Hiatt
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, UCSF, San Francisco, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCSF, San Francisco, USA.,Mission Hall UCSF, 550 16th Street, 2nd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA
| | - Amanda Sibley
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCSF, San Francisco, USA
| | - Brinda Venkatesh
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCSF, San Francisco, USA
| | - Joyce Cheng
- Chinese Community Health Resource Center, San Francisco, USA
| | - Niharika Dixit
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, UCSF at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, USA
| | - Rena Fox
- Department of Medicine, UCSF, San Francisco, USA
| | - Pamela Ling
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCSF, San Francisco, USA.,Department of Medicine, UCSF, San Francisco, USA.,Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UCSF, San Francisco, USA
| | - Tung Nguyen
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCSF, San Francisco, USA.,Department of Medicine, UCSF, San Francisco, USA
| | - Debora Oh
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, UCSF, San Francisco, USA
| | | | | | - Michael B Potter
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, UCSF, San Francisco, USA
| | - Ma Somsouk
- Division of Gastroenterology, UCSF, San Francisco, USA
| | - Roberto Ariel Vargas
- Center for Community Engagement, UCSF, San Francisco, USA.,Clinical and Translational Science Institute, UCSF, San Francisco, USA
| | | | - Alan Ashworth
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCSF, San Francisco, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Program Components and Results From an Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening Program Using Annual Fecal Immunochemical Testing. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20:145-152. [PMID: 33010408 PMCID: PMC7526597 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.09.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Programmatic colorectal cancer (CRC) screening increases uptake, but the design and resources utilized for such models are not well known. We characterized program components and participation at each step in a large program that used mailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) with opportunistic colonoscopy. METHODS Mixed-methods with site visits and retrospective cohort analysis of 51-75-year-old adults during 2017 in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California integrated health system. RESULTS Among 1,023,415 screening-eligible individuals, 405,963 (40%) were up to date with screening at baseline, and 507,401 of the 617,452 not up-to-date were mailed a FIT kit. Of the entire cohort (n = 1,023,415), 206,481 (20%) completed FIT within 28 days of mailing, another 61,644 (6%) after a robocall at week 4, and 40,438 others (4%) after a mailed reminder letter at week 6. There were over 800,000 medical record screening alerts generated and about 295,000 FIT kits distributed during patient office visits. About 100,000 FIT kits were ordered during direct-to-patient calls by medical assistants and 111,377 people (11%) completed FIT outside of the automated outreach period. Another 13,560 (1.3%) completed a colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, or fecal occult blood test unrelated to FIT. Cumulatively, 839,463 (82%) of those eligible were up to date with screening at the end of the year and 12,091 of 14,450 patients (83.7%) with positive FIT had diagnostic colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS The >82% screening participation achieved in this program resulted from a combination of prior endoscopy (40%), large initial response to mailed FIT kits (20%), followed by smaller responses to automated reminders (10%) and personal contact (12%).
Collapse
|
11
|
Somsouk M, Rachocki C, Mannalithara A, Garcia D, Laleau V, Grimes B, Issaka RB, Chen E, Vittinghoff E, Shapiro JA, Ladabaum U. Effectiveness and Cost of Organized Outreach for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2020; 112:305-313. [PMID: 31187126 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djz110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2019] [Revised: 04/30/2019] [Accepted: 05/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening remains underused, especially in safety-net systems. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness, costs, and cost-effectiveness of organized outreach using fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) compared with usual care. METHODS Patients age 50-75 years eligible for CRC screening from eight participating primary care safety-net clinics were randomly assigned to outreach intervention with usual care vs usual care alone. The intervention included a mailed postcard and call, followed by a mailed FIT kit, and a reminder phone call if the FIT kit was not returned. The primary outcome was screening participation at 1 year and a microcosting analysis of the outreach activities with embedded long-term cost-effectiveness of outreach. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS A total of 5386 patients were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 5434 to usual care. FIT screening was statistically significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (57.9% vs 37.4%, P < .001; difference = 20.5%, 95% confidence interval = 18.6% to 22.4%). In the intervention group, FIT completion rate was higher in patients who had previously completed a FIT vs those who had not (71.9% vs 35.7%, P < .001). There was evidence of effect modification of the intervention by language, and clinic. Outreach cost approximately $23 per patient and $112 per additional patient screened. Projecting long-term outcomes, outreach was estimated to cost $9200 per quality-adjusted life-year gained vs usual care. CONCLUSION Population-based management with organized FIT outreach statistically significantly increased CRC screening and was cost-effective in a safety-net system. The sustainability of the program and any impact of economies of scale remain to be determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ma Somsouk
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.,Center for Vulnerable Populations, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Carly Rachocki
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Ajitha Mannalithara
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Dianne Garcia
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Victoria Laleau
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Barbara Grimes
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Rachel B Issaka
- Clinical Research and Public Health Sciences Divisions, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.,Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Ellen Chen
- Department of Public Health, San Francisco, CA
| | - Eric Vittinghoff
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Uri Ladabaum
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gupta S, Coronado GD, Argenbright K, Brenner AT, Castañeda SF, Dominitz JA, Green B, Issaka RB, Levin TR, Reuland DS, Richardson LC, Robertson DJ, Singal AG, Pignone M. Mailed fecal immunochemical test outreach for colorectal cancer screening: Summary of a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-sponsored Summit. CA Cancer J Clin 2020; 70:283-298. [PMID: 32583884 PMCID: PMC7523556 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Revised: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 05/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Uptake of colorectal cancer screening remains suboptimal. Mailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) offers promise for increasing screening rates, but optimal strategies for implementation have not been well synthesized. In June 2019, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention convened a meeting of subject matter experts and stakeholders to answer key questions regarding mailed FIT implementation in the United States. Points of agreement included: 1) primers, such as texts, telephone calls, and printed mailings before mailed FIT, appear to contribute to effectiveness; 2) invitation letters should be brief and easy to read, and the signatory should be tailored based on setting; 3) instructions for FIT completion should be simple and address challenges that may lead to failed laboratory processing, such as notation of collection date; 4) reminders delivered to initial noncompleters should be used to increase the FIT return rate; 5) data infrastructure should identify eligible patients and track each step in the outreach process, from primer delivery through abnormal FIT follow-up; 6) protocols and procedures such as navigation should be in place to promote colonoscopy after abnormal FIT; 7) a high-quality, 1-sample FIT should be used; 8) sustainability requires a program champion and organizational support for the work, including sufficient funding and external policies (such as quality reporting requirements) to drive commitment to program investment; and 9) the cost effectiveness of mailed FIT has been established. Participants concluded that mailed FIT is an effective and efficient strategy with great potential for increasing colorectal cancer screening in diverse health care settings if more widely implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samir Gupta
- Section of Gastroenterology, Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California
- Department of Medicine, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | | | - Keith Argenbright
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas
- Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Moncrief Cancer Institute, Fort Worth, Texas
| | - Alison T Brenner
- Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Lineberger Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Sheila F Castañeda
- Department of Psychology, School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, California
| | - Jason A Dominitz
- Gastroenterology Section, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Beverly Green
- Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, Washington
- Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Rachel B Issaka
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Theodore R Levin
- Gastroenterology Department, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Walnut Creek, California
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California
| | - Daniel S Reuland
- Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Lineberger Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Lisa C Richardson
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Douglas J Robertson
- Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | - Amit G Singal
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Michael Pignone
- Department of Internal Medicine and LiveStrong Cancer Institutes, Dell Medical School, University of Texas Austin, Austin, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lam AY, Lee JK. Low-Literacy Instructions Enable Successful Completion of Fecal Immunochemical Tests. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17:1729-1731. [PMID: 31055180 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.04.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2019] [Accepted: 04/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Y Lam
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Jeffrey K Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California
| |
Collapse
|