1
|
De Deo D, Dal Buono A, Gabbiadini R, Spaggiari P, Busacca A, Masoni B, Ferretti S, Bezzio C, Armuzzi A. Management of proctitis in ulcerative colitis and the place of biological therapies. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2024; 24:443-453. [PMID: 38874980 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2024.2369189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Approximately 20-30% of the patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) may present with isolated proctitis. Ulcerative proctitis (UP) is a challenging condition to manage due to its significant burden in terms of disabling symptoms. AREAS COVERED PubMed was searched up to March 2024 to identify relevant studies on UP. A comprehensive summary and critical appraisal of the available data on UP are provided, highlighting emerging treatments and areas for future research. EXPERT OPINION Patients with UP are often undertreated, and the disease burden is often underestimated in clinical practice. Treat-to-target management algorithms can be applied to UP, aiming for clinical remission in the short term, and endoscopic remission and maintenance of remission in the long term. During their disease, approximately one-third of UP patients require advanced therapies. Escalation to biologic therapy is required for refractory or steroid dependent UP. For optimal patient care and management of UP, it is necessary to include these patients in future randomized clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diletta De Deo
- IBD Center, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Arianna Dal Buono
- IBD Center, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Paola Spaggiari
- Department of Pathology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano Milan, Italy
| | - Anita Busacca
- IBD Center, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Benedetta Masoni
- IBD Center, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Ferretti
- IBD Center, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristina Bezzio
- IBD Center, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Armuzzi
- IBD Center, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Uzzan M, Nachury M, Nuzzo A, Amiot A, Caron B, Benezech A, Buisson A, Bouguen G, Le Berre C, Reenaers C, Le Cosquer G, Savoye G, Charkaoui M, Vidon M, Guillo L, Fumery M, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Kirchgesner J, Bouhnik Y. Tofacitinib for Patients with Anti-TNF Refractory Ulcerative Proctitis: A Multicentre Cohort Study from the GETAID. J Crohns Colitis 2024; 18:424-430. [PMID: 37796025 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 09/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although ulcerative proctitis [UP] can dramatically impair quality of life, treatment efficacy has been poorly investigated in UP as it was historically excluded from phase 2/3 randomised controlled trials in ulcerative colitis. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib for the treatment of UP. METHODS We conducted a retrospective, multicentre study in 17 GETAID centres, including consecutive patients with UP treated with tofacitinib. The primary endpoint was steroid-free remission between Week 8 and Week 14, defined as a partial Mayo score of 2 [and no individual subscore above 1]. Secondary outcomes included clinical response and steroid-free remission after induction and at 1 year. RESULTS All the 35 enrolled patients previously received anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] therapy and 88.6% were exposed to at least two lines of biologics. At baseline, the median partial Mayo score was 7 (intequartile range [IQR] [5.5-7]). After induction [W8-W14], 42.9% and 60.0% of patients achieved steroid-free remission and clinical response, respectively. At 1 year, the steroid-free clinical remission and clinical response rates were 39.4% and 45.5%, respectively, and 51.2% [17/33] were still receiving tofacitinib treatment. Survival without tofacitinib withdrawal was estimated at 50.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] [35.5-71.6]) at 1 year. Only a lower partial Mayo at baseline was independently associated with remission at induction (0dds ratio [OR] = 0.56 for an increase of 1, (95% CI [0.33-0.95], p = 0.03). Five [14.3%] adverse events were reported, with one leading to treatment withdrawal [septic shock secondary to cholecystitis]. CONCLUSION Tofacitinib may offer a therapeutic option for patients with refractory UP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieu Uzzan
- University of Lille, CHU Lille, Institute for Translational Research in Inflammation, Lille, France
| | - Maria Nachury
- University of Lille, CHU Lille, Institute for Translational Research in Inflammation, Lille, France
| | - Alexandre Nuzzo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hopital Beaujon, Universite de Paris, France
| | - Aurélien Amiot
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hopitaux Universitaires Bicêtre, Universite Paris Est Creteil and Universite Paris Saclay, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | - Bénédicte Caron
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nancy University Hospital, and INSERM, NGERE, University of Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Alban Benezech
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier Avignon, Avignon, France
| | - Anthony Buisson
- Université Clermont Auvergne, Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | | | - Catherine Le Berre
- Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie et Assistance Nutritionnelle,Nantes Université, Nantes, France
| | - Catherine Reenaers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CHU Liège, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Guillaume Le Cosquer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Pancreatology, Hôpital Rangueil, Université Toulouse Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Guillaume Savoye
- Department of Gastroenterology Rouen University Hospital, UMR 1073 University of Rouen Normandy, Rouen, France
| | - Maeva Charkaoui
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France
| | - Mathias Vidon
- Department of Gastroenterology. Hopital Intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil, France
| | - Lucas Guillo
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Marseille Nord, University of Aix-Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - Mathurin Fumery
- Department of Gastroenterology, Amiens University Hospital, and UMR I01, PERITOX, Jules Verne University of Picardy, Amiens, France
| | - Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nancy University Hospital, and INSERM, NGERE, University of Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Julien Kirchgesner
- Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Sorbonne Université, Department of Gastroenterology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France
| | - Yoram Bouhnik
- Paris IBD Center, Groupe Hospitalier Privé Ambroise Paré - Hartmann, Neuilly sur Seine, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lemmens P, Louis E, Van Moerkercke W, Pouillon L, Somers M, Peeters H, Vanden Branden S, Busschaert J, Baert F, Cremer A, Potvin P, Dewit S, Colard A, Swinnen J, Lambrecht G, Claessens C, Willandt B, Dewint P, Van Dyck E, Sabino J, Vermeire S, Ferrante M. Outcome of Biological Therapies and Small Molecules in Ulcerative Proctitis: A Belgian Multicenter Cohort Study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 22:154-163.e3. [PMID: 37442318 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.06.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 06/17/2023] [Accepted: 06/25/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Several advanced therapies (biologic therapies and small molecules) have been approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. The registration trials for these agents typically excluded patients with isolated proctitis, leaving an evidence gap. We evaluated efficacy and safety of advanced therapies in patients with ulcerative proctitis (UP). METHODS This multicenter retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients with active UP (Mayo endoscopy subscore of ≥2, rectal inflammation up to 15 cm) initiating advanced therapy, after failing conventional therapy. The primary end point was short-term steroid-free clinical remission (total Mayo score ≤2 with no individual subscore >1). In addition, drug persistence and relapse-free and colectomy-free survival were assessed. Both binary logistic and Cox regression analyses were performed. RESULTS In total, 167 consecutive patients (52.0% female; median age 41.0 years; 82.0% bionaive) underwent 223 courses of therapy for UP (38 adalimumab, 14 golimumab, 54 infliximab, 9 ustekinumab, 99 vedolizumab, 9 tofacitinib). The primary end point was achieved with 36.3% of the treatment courses, and based on multivariate analysis, more commonly attained in bionaive patients (P = .001), patients treated with vedolizumab (P = .001), patients with moderate endoscopic disease activity (P = .002), and a body mass index <25 kg/m2 (P = .018). Drug persistence was significantly higher in patients treated with vedolizumab (P < .001) and patients with a shorter disease duration (P = .006). No new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSIONS Advanced therapies are also efficacious and safe in patients with ulcerative colitis limited to the rectum. Therefore, the inclusion of patients with UP in future randomized-controlled trials should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pauline Lemmens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Edouard Louis
- Department of Gastroenterology, CHU Liege and Liege University, Liege, Belgium
| | | | - Lieven Pouillon
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium
| | - Michael Somers
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Harald Peeters
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Gent, Gent, Belgium
| | | | | | - Filip Baert
- Department of Gastroenterology, AZ Delta, Roeselare, Belgium
| | - Anneline Cremer
- Department of Gastroenterology, Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Philippe Potvin
- Department of Gastroenterology, AZ Rivierenland, Bornem, Belgium
| | - Sophie Dewit
- Department of Gastroenterology, Noorderhart Maria Hospital, Pelt, Belgium
| | - Arnaud Colard
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier Chrétien - Clinique St Joseph, Liege, Belgium
| | - Jo Swinnen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sint Franciscus Hospital, Heusden-Zolder, Belgium
| | - Guy Lambrecht
- Department of Gastroenterology, AZ Damiaan, Oostende, Belgium
| | | | | | - Pieter Dewint
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of Gastroenterology, AZ Maria Middelares, Gent, Belgium
| | - Evi Van Dyck
- Department of Gastroenterology, AZ Klina, Brasschaat, Belgium
| | - Joao Sabino
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism (CHROMETA), Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Séverine Vermeire
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism (CHROMETA), Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marc Ferrante
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism (CHROMETA), Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tal N, Tzivinikos C, Gasparetto M, Serban DE, Zifman E, Hojsak I, Ledder O, Yerushalmy Feler A, Rolandsdotter H, Aloi M, Bramuzzo M, Buderus S, Lionetti P, Norsa L, Norden C, Urlep D, Romano C, Shaoul R, Martinez-Vinson C, Karoliny A, De Greef E, Kang B, VIčková E, Alvisi P, Kori M, Tavares M, Weiss B, Hussey S, Qamhawi ME, Palomino Pérez LM, Henderson P, Parmar R, Miele E, Rinawi F, Lozano-Ruf A, Zamvar V, Kolho KL, Shouval DS. Clinical Features and Natural History of Paediatric Patients with Ulcerative Proctitis: A Multicentre Study from the Paediatric IBD Porto Group of ESPGHAN. J Crohns Colitis 2023; 17:1939-1948. [PMID: 37392064 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Ulcerative proctitis [UP] is an uncommon presentation in paediatric patients with ulcerative colitis. We aimed to characterize the clinical features and natural history of UP in children, and to identify predictors of poor outcomes. METHODS This was a retrospective study involving 37 sites affiliated with the IBD Porto Group of ESPGHAN. Data were collected from patients aged <18 years diagnosed with UP between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2020. RESULTS We identified 196 patients with UP (median age at diagnosis 14.6 years [interquartile range, IQR 12.5-16.0]), with a median follow-up of 2.7 years [IQR 1.7-3.8]. The most common presenting symptoms were bloody stools [95%], abdominal pain [61%] and diarrhoea [47%]. At diagnosis, the median paediatric ulcerative colitis activity index [PUCAI] score was 25 [IQR 20-35], but most patients exhibited moderate-severe endoscopic inflammation. By the end of induction, 5-aminosalicylic acid administration orally, topically or both resulted in clinical remission rates of 48%, 48%, and 73%, respectively. The rates of treatment escalation to biologics at 1, 3, and 5 years were 10%, 22%, and 43%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the PUCAI score at diagnosis was significantly associated with initiation of systemic steroids, or biologics, and subsequent acute severe colitis events and inflammatory bowel disease-associated admission, with a score ≥35 providing an increased risk for poor outcomes. By the end of follow-up, 3.1% of patients underwent colectomy. Patients with UP that experienced proximal disease progression during follow-up [48%] had significantly higher rates of a caecal patch at diagnosis and higher PUCAI score by the end of induction, compared to those without progression. CONCLUSION Paediatric patients with UP exhibit high rates of treatment escalation and proximal disease extension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noa Tal
- Institute of Gastroenterology, Nutrition and Liver Disease, Schneider Children's Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Christos Tzivinikos
- Paediatric Gastroenterology Department, Al Jalila Children's Specialty Hospital, Mohammed Bin Rashid University, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Marco Gasparetto
- Barts Health NHS Trust, The Royal London Children's Hospital, Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Queen Mary University of London, Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, London, UK
| | - Daniela E Serban
- 2nd Clinic of Pediatrics, 'Iuliu Hatieganu' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Emergency Clinical Hospital for Children, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Eyal Zifman
- Pediatric Gastroenterology Unit, Meir Medical Center, Kfar-Saba, Israel
| | - Iva Hojsak
- Referral Center for Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Children's Hospital Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Oren Ledder
- The Juliet Keidan Institute of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Anat Yerushalmy Feler
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Pediatric Gastroenterology Institute, 'Dana-Dwek' Children's Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Helena Rolandsdotter
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Sachs' Children and Youth Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marina Aloi
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Institute, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Matteo Bramuzzo
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS 'Burlo Garofolo', Trieste, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Lionetti
- Department NEUROFARBA, University of Florence, Meyer Children's Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Norsa
- Pediatric Hepatology, Gastroenterology and Transplantation Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Christoph Norden
- Department of Pediatrics, Hvidovre University Hospital, Copenhagen, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Darja Urlep
- Pediatric Gastroenterology and Liver Unit, University Children's Hospital of the University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Claudio Romano
- Pediatric Gastroenterology and Cystic Fibrosis Unit, Department of Human Pathology in Adulthood and Childhood 'G. Barresi', University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Ron Shaoul
- Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition Institute, Ruth Children's Hospital of Haifa, Rambam Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel
| | - Christine Martinez-Vinson
- Service de Gastroentérologie et Nutrition Pédiatriques, Hôpital Universitaire Robert-Debré, Paris, France
| | - Anna Karoliny
- Heim Pál National Pediatric Institute, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Elisabeth De Greef
- Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Kidz Health Castle UZ Brussels, Free University Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ben Kang
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
| | - Eva VIčková
- Department of Pediatrics, 2nd Medical Faculty, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Patrizia Alvisi
- Pediatric Gastroenterology Unit, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Michal Kori
- Pdiatric Gastroenterology, Kaplan Medical Centre, Rehovot and the Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Marta Tavares
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Centro Materno Infantil do Norte, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Batia Weiss
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Edmond and Lily Safra Children's Hospital, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Seamus Hussey
- Children's Health Ireland, UCD and RCSI, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Maria E Qamhawi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital, StockholmSweden
| | - Laura M Palomino Pérez
- Gastroenterology and Nutrition Department, Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, Madrid, Spain
| | - Paul Henderson
- Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Royal Hospital for Children and Young People, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Raj Parmar
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle, UK
| | - Erasmo Miele
- Department of Translational Medical Science, Section of Pediatrics, University of Naples 'Federico II', Naples, Italy
| | - Firas Rinawi
- Pediatric Gastroenterology Unit, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
- The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Ana Lozano-Ruf
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Veena Zamvar
- Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Leeds Children's Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Kaija-Leena Kolho
- Children's Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Dror S Shouval
- Institute of Gastroenterology, Nutrition and Liver Disease, Schneider Children's Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Aruljothy A, Singh S, Narula N, Moran GW, Vuyyuru SK, Hogan M, Zayadi A, MacDonald JK, Caron B, Danese S, Biroulet LP, Ma C, Jairath V. Systematic review with meta-analysis: Medical therapies for treatment of ulcerative proctitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2023; 58:740-762. [PMID: 37589498 PMCID: PMC11162959 DOI: 10.1111/apt.17666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 05/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ulcerative proctitis (UP) is a common highly symptomatic form of ulcerative colitis that can be difficult to treat. AIM To assess the efficacy of medical treatments for UP. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL on 23 November 2022 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of medical therapy for adults with UP. Primary outcomes included induction and maintenance of clinical remission. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each outcome. RESULTS We included 53 RCTs (n = 4096) including 46 induction studies (n = 3731) and seven maintenance studies (n = 365). First-line therapies included topical 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), conventional corticosteroids, budesonide, and oral 5-ASA. Therapy for refractory UP included topical tacrolimus and small molecules. Topical 5-ASA was superior to placebo for induction (RR 2.72, 95% CI 1.94-3.82) and maintenance of remission (RR 2.09, 95% CI 1.26-3.46). Topical corticosteroids were superior to placebo for induction of remission (RR 2.83, 95% CI 1.62-4.92). Topical budesonide was superior to placebo for induction of remission (RR 2.34, 95% CI 1.44-3.81). Combination therapy with topical 5-ASA and topical corticosteroids was superior to topical monotherapy with either agent. Topical tacrolimus was superior to placebo. Etrasimod was superior to placebo for induction (RR 4.71, 95% CI 1.2-18.49) and maintenance of remission (RR 2.08, 95% CI 1.31-3.32). CONCLUSIONS Topical 5-ASA and corticosteroids are effective for active UP. Topical 5-ASA may be effective for maintenance of remission. Tacrolimus may be effective for induction of remission. Etrasimod may be effective for induction and for maintenance of remission. Trials should include UP to expand the evidence base for this under-represented population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Achuthan Aruljothy
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Siddharth Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Neeraj Narula
- Division of Gastroenterology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gordon W. Moran
- National Institute of Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham and Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sudheer K. Vuyyuru
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Alimentiv, Inc., London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Benedicte Caron
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy, Nancy, France
- University of Lorraine, Inserm, NGERE, Nancy, France
| | - Silvio Danese
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Laurent Peyrin Biroulet
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy, Nancy, France
- University of Lorraine, Inserm, NGERE, Nancy, France
| | - Christopher Ma
- Alimentiv, Inc., London, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Vipul Jairath
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Alimentiv, Inc., London, Ontario, Canada
- Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lee WS, Arai K, Alex G, Treepongkaruna S, Kim KM, Choong CL, Mercado KS, Darma A, Srivastava A, Aw MM, Huang J, Ni YH, Malik R, Tanpowpong P, Tran HN, Ukarapol N. Medical Management of Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease (PIBD) in the Asia Pacific Region: A Position Paper by the Asian Pan-Pacific Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (APPSPGHAN) PIBD Working Group. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 38:523-538. [PMID: 36574956 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2022] [Revised: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (PIBD) is rising rapidly in many industrialised and affluent areas in the Asia Pacific region. Current available guidelines, mainly from Europe and North America, may not be completely applicable to clinicians caring for children with PIBD in this region due to differences in disease characteristics and regional resources constraints. This position paper is an initiative from the Asian Pan-Pacific Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (APPSPGHAN) with the aim of providing an up-to-date, evidence-based approach to PIBD in the Asia Pacific region, taking into consideration the unique disease characteristics and financial resources available in this region. A group of pediatric gastroenterologists with special interest in PIBD performed an extensive literature search covering epidemiology, disease characteristics and natural history, management and monitoring. Gastrointestinal infections, including tuberculosis, need to be excluded before diagnosing IBD. In some populations in Asia, the Nudix Hydrolase 15 (NUD15) gene is a better predictor of leukopenia induced by azathioprine than thiopurine-S-methyltransferase (TPMT). The main considerations in the use of biologics in the Asia Pacific region are high cost, ease of access, and potential infectious risk, especially tuberculosis. Conclusion: This position paper provides a useful guide to clinicians in the medical management of children with PIBD in the Asia Pacific region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Way Seah Lee
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Katsuhiro Arai
- Center for Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - George Alex
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Suporn Treepongkaruna
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Kyung Mo Kim
- Department of Pediatrics, Asan Medical Center Children's Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chee Liang Choong
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Karen Sc Mercado
- Makati Medical Center and The Medical City, Philippine Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Manila, Philippines
| | - Andy Darma
- Department of Child Health, Dr. Soetomo General Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
| | - Anshu Srivastava
- Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Marion M Aw
- Department of Paediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - James Huang
- Division of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Nutrition, Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Department of Paediatrics, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Yen Hsuan Ni
- National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taiwan
| | - Rohan Malik
- Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India
| | - Pornthep Tanpowpong
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Hong Ngoc Tran
- Department of Gastroenterology, Children's Hospital # 1, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Nuthapong Ukarapol
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Park J, Cheon JH. Updates on conventional therapies for inflammatory bowel diseases: 5-aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, immunomodulators, and anti-TNF-α. Korean J Intern Med 2022; 37:895-905. [PMID: 35882566 PMCID: PMC9449200 DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2022.132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are rapidly increasing worldwide. IBDs are considered an emerging problem not only in Western countries but also in developing counties. The relapses and complications of active IBD mandate various medications. Nevertheless, hospitalization, emergency room visits, or surgery may be required, resulting in a socioeconomic burden. Great advances have been made in the development of new therapeutic options for IBD to achieve induction and maintenance remission. Nevertheless, conventional therapy is still the mainstay in the treatment of IBD. This review article provides an update on recent advances in conventional therapies, including 5-aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, immunomodulators, and anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents to treat IBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jihye Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Jae Hee Cheon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
- Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
A review of the rationale for the testing of the calcineurin inhibitor tacrolimus for post-ERCP pancreatitis prevention. Pancreatology 2022; 22:678-682. [PMID: 35872075 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2022.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Revised: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is commonly performed for the management of pancreaticobiliary disorders. The most troublesome ERCP-associated adverse event is post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), which occurs in up to 15% of all patients undergoing ERCP. A substantial body of preclinical data support a mechanistic rationale for calcineurin inhibitors in preventing PEP. The findings are coupled with recent clinical data suggesting lower rates of PEP in patients who concurrently use the calcineurin inhibitor tacrolimus (e.g., solid organ transplant recipients). In this review, we will firstly summarize data in support of testing the use of tacrolimus for PEP prophylaxis, either in combination with rectal indomethacin or by itself. Secondly, we propose that administering tacrolimus through the rectal route could be favorable for PEP prophylaxis over other routes of administration.
Collapse
|
9
|
Caron B, Sandborn WJ, Panaccione R, Schreiber S, Hart A, Solitano V, Danese S, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Efficacy of Pharmacological Agents for Ulcerative Proctitis: A Systematic Literature Review. J Crohns Colitis 2022; 16:922-930. [PMID: 34850857 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ulcerative proctitis is a common and often highly symptomatic form of inflammatory bowel disease. We performed a systematic review to assess the efficacy of different therapies in the management of patients with ulcerative proctitis. METHODS We identified randomized controlled trials in adults with ulcerative proctitis treated with oral or topical therapies for induction of response or remission, or prevention of relapse. RESULTS A total of 32 randomized controlled trials were included [27 induction/2839 participants, five maintenance/334 participants]. Follow-up varied from 3 to 8 weeks for induction, and from 6 to 24 months for maintenance of remission. 5-Aminosalicylic acid [5-ASA] suppository was the most frequently evaluated treatment [14/32, 43.7%], followed by steroid enema [7/32, 21.9%]. Topical 5-ASA demonstrated effectiveness for induction of clinical response or remission and prevention of relapse in several studies. Combined topical steroids and 5-ASA was more effective than topical 5-ASA or topical steroids alone to induce response [100% of patients for combination vs 70% for beclomethasone alone and 76% for 5-ASA alone]. One observational study suggested azathioprine may be effective in patients with ulcerative proctitis. Only two cohort studies evaluated the efficacy of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in ulcerative proctitis. Small molecules, anti-integrins and anti-interleukin therapies have not been evaluated in isolated ulcerative proctitis. CONCLUSION The role of topical 5-ASA as a treatment for ulcerative proctitis has been confirmed in this systematic literature review, for induction and maintenance of remission. Future trials are needed to investigate the efficacy of more recent and upcoming drug classes in patients with ulcerative proctitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bénédicte Caron
- Department of Gastroenterology and Inserm NGERE U1256, Nancy University Hospital, University of Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - William J Sandborn
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Remo Panaccione
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Stefan Schreiber
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Ailsa Hart
- Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Unit, St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK
| | - Virginia Solitano
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvio Danese
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milano, Italy
| | - Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
- Department of Gastroenterology and Inserm NGERE U1256, Nancy University Hospital, University of Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Nearly one-third of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) do not achieve remission despite our best therapies. When this happens, it is critical to understand the reason for treatment failure. Once nonresponse is confirmed, these patients should be referred to an IBD centre for multidisciplinary care. This review will discuss the remaining treatment options, including escalation of biologics to unlicensed doses, combination biologics, nonvalidated therapies and surgical options. It will additionally provide updates in the management of acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). RECENT FINDINGS There is an increasing interest in combination biologics to treat refractory IBD, although data supporting its safety and effectiveness are limited. The use of hyperbaric oxygen, mesenchymal stem cell therapy and dietary interventions also show early promise in this area. Studies have additionally focused on personalized therapy to identify aggressive phenotypes and predict treatment response in these challenging patients. In ASUC, infliximab and cyclosporine remain mainstays of treatment, and tofacitinib shows promise as a salvage therapy. SUMMARY Refractory IBD is common, yet large knowledge gaps remain. Recent and ongoing studies have focused on medical, surgical and dietary approaches with mixed success. Larger prospective studies are desperately needed to address this complex issue.
Collapse
|
11
|
Gordon M, Sinopoulou V, Akobeng AK, Pana M, Gasiea R, Moran GW. Tacrolimus (FK506) for induction of remission in corticosteroid-refractory ulcerative colitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 4:CD007216. [PMID: 35388476 PMCID: PMC8987360 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd007216.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are a limited number of treatment options for people with corticosteroid-refractory ulcerative colitis. Animal models of inflammatory bowel disease and uncontrolled studies in humans suggest that tacrolimus may be an effective treatment for ulcerative colitis. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus for induction of remission in people with corticosteroid-refractory ulcerative colitis. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Gut group specialised register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Clinicaltrials.gov and WHO ICTRP from inception to October 2021 to identify relevant randomised controlled trials (RCT). SELECTION CRITERIA Two review authors independently selected potentially relevant studies to determine eligibility based on the prespecified criteria. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently extracted data and analysed them using Review Manager Web. The primary outcomes were induction of remission and clinical improvement, as defined by the studies and expressed as a percentage of the participants randomised (intention-to-treat analysis). MAIN RESULTS This review included five RCTs with 347 participants who had active ulcerative colitis or ulcerative proctitis. The duration of intervention varied between two weeks and eight weeks. Tacrolimus versus placebo Tacrolimus (oral and rectal) may be superior in achieving clinical remission compared to placebo (oral and rectal) (14/87 participants with tacrolimus versus 1/61 participants with placebo; risk ratio (RR) 3.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03 to 13.73; 3 studies). These results are of low certainty due to imprecision and risk of bias. Tacrolimus (oral and rectal) may be superior for clinical improvement compared to placebo (oral and rectal) (45/87 participants with tacrolimus versus 7/61 participants with placebo; RR 4.47, 95% CI 2.15 to 9.29; 3 studies). These results are of low certainty due to imprecision and risk of bias. The evidence is very uncertain about the effects of tacrolimus (oral and rectal) on serious adverse events compared to placebo (oral and rectal) (2/87 participants with tacrolimus versus 0/61 participants with placebo; RR 2.44, 95% CI 0.12 to 48.77; 3 studies). These results are of very low certainty due to high imprecision and risk of bias. Tacrolimus versus ciclosporin One study compared oral tacrolimus to intravenous ciclosporin, with an intervention lasting two weeks and 113 randomised participants. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of tacrolimus on achievement of clinical remission compared to ciclosporin (15/33 participants with tacrolimus versus 24/80 participants with ciclosporin; RR 1.52, 95% CI 0.92 to 2.50). The results are of very low certainty due to risk of bias and high imprecision. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of tacrolimus on clinical improvement compared to intravenous ciclosporin (23/33 participants with tacrolimus versus 62/80 participants with ciclosporin; RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.16). The results are of very low certainty due to risk of bias and imprecision. Tacrolimus versus beclometasone One study compared tacrolimus suppositories with beclometasone suppositories in an intervention lasting four weeks with 88 randomised participants. There may be little to no difference in achievement of clinical remission (16/44 participants with tacrolimus versus 15/44 participants with beclometasone; RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.88). The results are of low certainty due to high imprecision. There may be little to no difference in clinical improvement when comparing tacrolimus suppositories to beclometasone suppositories (22/44 participants with tacrolimus versus 22/44 with beclometasone; RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.52). The results are of low certainty due to high imprecision. There may be little to no difference in serious adverse events when comparing tacrolimus suppositories to beclometasone suppositories (1/44 participants with tacrolimus versus 0/44 with beclometasone; RR 3.00, 95% CI 0.13 to 71.70). These results are of low certainty due to high imprecision. There may be little to no difference in total adverse events when comparing tacrolimus suppositories to beclometasone suppositories (21/44 participants with tacrolimus versus 14/44 participants with beclometasone; RR 1.50, 95% CI 0.88 to 2.55). These results are of low certainty due to high imprecision. No secondary outcomes were reported for people requiring rescue medication or to undergo surgery. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is low-certainty evidence that tacrolimus may be superior to placebo for achievement of clinical remission and clinical improvement in corticosteroid-refractory colitis or corticosteroid-refractory proctitis. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of tacrolimus compared to ciclosporin for achievement of clinical remission or clinical improvement. There may be no difference between tacrolimus and beclometasone for inducing clinical remission or clinical improvement. The cohorts studied to date were small, with missing data sets, offered short follow-up and the clinical endpoints used were not in line with those suggested by regulatory bodies. Therefore, no clinical practice conclusions can be made. This review highlights the need for further research that targets the relevant clinical questions, uses appropriate trial methodology and reports key findings in a systematic manner that facilitates future integration of findings with current evidence to better inform clinicians and patients. Future studies need to be adequately powered and of pertinent duration so as to capture the efficacy and effectiveness of tacrolimus in the medium to long term. Well-structured efficacy studies need to be followed up by long-term phase 4 extensions to provide key outputs and inform in a real-world setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morris Gordon
- School of Medicine, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | | | | | - Mirela Pana
- School of Medicine, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Rehab Gasiea
- School of Medicine, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Gordon William Moran
- National Institute of Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham and Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Michalopoulos G, Karmiris K. When disease extent is not always a key parameter: Management of refractory ulcerative proctitis. CURRENT RESEARCH IN PHARMACOLOGY AND DRUG DISCOVERY 2022; 3:100071. [PMID: 34988432 PMCID: PMC8695253 DOI: 10.1016/j.crphar.2021.100071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Revised: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with ulcerative proctitis represent a sub-group of ulcerative colitis patients with specific characteristics. Disease-related symptoms, endoscopic findings and patient's personality perspectives create a difficult-to-assess condition in certain cases. Objectives To summarize available evidence on the management of refractory ulcerative proctitis and provide insights in treatment options. Results /Conclusion: Topical therapy plays a central role due to the location of the disease. However, well-established treatment options may become exhausted in a considerable proportion of ulcerative proctitis patients, indicating the need to advance to more potent therapies in order to induce and maintain clinical response and remission in these refractory cases. Systemic corticosteroids, thiopurines, calcineurin inhibitors, biologic agents and small molecules have all been tested with variable success rates. Investigational interventions as well as surgical procedures are kept as the ultimate resort in multi-treatment resistant cases. Identifying early prognostic factors that herald a disabling disease progression will help in optimizing treatment and avoiding surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Michalopoulos
- Departments of Gastroenterology, Tzaneion General Hospital, Leoforos Afentouli, 18536, Piraeus, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Karmiris
- Departments of Gastroenterology, Venizeleio General Hospital, Knosos Avenue, P.O.Box 44, 71409, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Raine T, Verstockt B, Kopylov U, Karmiris K, Goldberg R, Atreya R, Burisch J, Burke J, Ellul P, Hedin C, Holubar SD, Katsanos K, Lobaton T, Schmidt C, Cullen G. ECCO Topical Review: Refractory Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J Crohns Colitis 2021; 15:1605-1620. [PMID: 34160593 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease is a chronic disease with variable degrees of extent, severity, and activity. A proportion of patients will have disease that is refractory to licensed therapies, resulting in significant impairment in quality of life. The treatment of these patients involves a systematic approach by the entire multidisciplinary team, with particular consideration given to medical options including unlicensed therapies, surgical interventions, and dietetic and psychological support. The purpose of this review is to guide clinicians through this process and provide an accurate summary of the available evidence for different strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Raine
- Department of Gastroenterology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Bram Verstockt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, TARGID - IBD, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Uri Kopylov
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | | | - Rimma Goldberg
- Department of Gastroenterology, Monash Health and School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Raja Atreya
- Department of Medicine 1, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Johan Burisch
- Gastrounit, Medical Division, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - John Burke
- Colorectal and General Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Pierre Ellul
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta
| | - Charlotte Hedin
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Medicine Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
- Karolinska University Hospital, Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Dermatovenereology and Rheumatology, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Stefan D Holubar
- Department of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Konstantinos Katsanos
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University and Medical School of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Triana Lobaton
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Carsten Schmidt
- Medical Faculty of the Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany
| | - Garret Cullen
- Centre for Colorectal Disease, St Vincent's University Hospital and School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Gastroenterology, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Si Y, Shao L, Gao S, Wen H. Suppository treatment in ulcerative proctitis. EUR J INFLAMM 2021. [DOI: 10.1177/20587392211015108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Ulcerative proctitis (UP) is a common form of ulcerative colitis (UC), the number of patients with UP is increasing. Suppository treatment containing mesalamine is usually the first-line choice for mild to moderate UP, here, we review the publications on mesalamine suppository in UP, to better understand its dosage, duration of therapy and adverse events in both induction and maintenance phases. We also review articles on budesonide, beclomethasone, tacrolimus, herbal medicine and acetarsol suppositories in UP, to present therapeutic strategies for patients with UP refractory to mesalamine suppository.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yingjie Si
- Department of Gastroenterology, Longhua Hospital, Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - LanJun Shao
- Department of Internal Medicine, Qingpu District Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Shanqing Gao
- Department of Internal Medicine, Fengxian District Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Hongzhu Wen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Longhua Hospital, Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Salem G, Ding K, Sakuraba A, Cohen R. Role of topical tacrolimus in the management of proctitis, perianal manifestations in Crohn's disease, and chronic pouchitis: a systematic review. J Investig Med 2021; 69:jim-2020-001699. [PMID: 33622709 DOI: 10.1136/jim-2020-001699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Several published studies have evaluated the safety and effectiveness of oral and intravenous tacrolimus for the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, little is known about the effectiveness of topical tacrolimus in this patient population. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the current state of literature to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of rectal administration of topical tacrolimus, in the form of suppository, ointment, and/or enema in patients with ulcerative proctitis, perianal Crohn's disease (CD), and chronic refractory pouchitis. Electronic database searches were conducted in international databases since their inception until February 2020. Study subjects were categorized into three groups: topical tacrolimus for patients with proctitis, perianal CD, and chronic refractory pouchitis. The primary end point of this study was the remission rate. Secondary end points were response rate and the incidence of AEs. Eleven studies were included in the final assessment in this systematic review. This provided information from 188 patients. Tacrolimus was administered topically as suppositories, ointment, or enema. Clinical remission was achieved in 57.1%, 57.14%, and 70.0% in patients with proctitis, fistulizing perianal CD, and chronic pouchitis. The most commonly reported side effect was perianal itching and burning. Reversible nephrotoxicity occurred in a single patient. No clear correlation was found between blood levels and clinical outcomes. Topical tacrolimus is effective for a subset of patients with IBD. The adverse effects were minimal and tolerable. Well-designed randomized clinical trials are warranted to establish the appropriate dose and administration method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Salem
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Kai Ding
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kucharzik T, Koletzko S, Kannengiesser K, Dignass A. Ulcerative Colitis-Diagnostic and Therapeutic Algorithms. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2020; 117:564-574. [PMID: 33148393 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Revised: 03/05/2020] [Accepted: 07/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ulcerative colitis is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease with an estimated 150 000 patients in Germany alone. METHODS This review is based on publications about current diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for ulcerative colitis that were retrieved by a selective search in PubMed, and on current guidelines. RESULTS The primary goal of treatment is endoscopically confirmed healing of the mucosa. Mesalamine, in various forms of administration, remains the standard treatment for uncomplicated ulcerative colitis. Its superiority over placebo has been confirmed in meta-analyses of randomized, controlled trials. Glucocorticoids are highly effective in the acute treatment of ulcerative colitis, but they should only be used over the short term, because of their marked side effects. Further drugs are available to treat patients with a more complicated disease course of ulcerative colitis, including azathioprine, biological agents, JAK inhibitors (among them TNF antibodies, biosimilars, ustekinumab, vedolizumab, and tofacitinib), and calcineurin inhibitors. Proctocolectomy should be considered in refractory cases, or in the presence of high-grade epithelial dysplasia. Ulcerative colitis beginning in childhood or adolescence is often characterized by rapid progression and frequent comorbidities that make its treatment a special challenge. CONCLUSION A wide variety of drugs are now available for the treatment of ulcerative colitis, enabling the individualized choice of the best treatment for each patient. Regular surveillance colonoscopies to rule out colon carcinoma should be scheduled at intervals that depend on risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torsten Kucharzik
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, University Teaching Hospital Lüneburg; Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, LMU Klinikum, University of Munich; Department of Pediatrics, Gastroenterology and Nutrition, School of Medicine Collegium Medicum University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland; Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, LMU Klinikum, University of Munich; Medical Clinic I, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt/Main
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|