Associations of HBV Genotype B vs C Infection With Relapse After Cessation of Entecavir or Tenofovir Therapy

PegIFN alpha-2a reduces relapse in HBeAg-negative patients after nucleo(s)tide analogue cessation: A randomized-controlled trial

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Nucleo(s)tide analogue (NUC) cessation can lead to hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) clearance but also a high rate of virological relapse. However, the effect of pegylated interferon alpha-2a (PegIFN-α-2a) on virological relapse after NUC cessation is unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of switching from NUC to PegIFN-α-2a treatment for 48 weeks on virological relapse up to week 96.

METHODS

In this multicenter randomized-controlled clinical trial, 180 non-cirrhotic patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B on continuous NUC therapy for ≥2.5 years, with HBV DNA levels <60 IU/ml, were randomized to discontinue NUC therapy (n = 90) or receive 48 weeks of PegIFN-α-2a treatment (n = 90). Patients were followed up for up to 96 weeks. The primary endpoint was the virological relapse rate up to week 96.

RESULTS

Intention-to-treat analysis revealed patients in the interferon monotherapy group had significantly lower cumulative virological relapse rates than the NUC cessation group until week 96 (20.8% vs. 53.6%, p <0.0001). Consistently, a significantly lower proportion of patients in the interferon monotherapy group had virological relapse than those in the NUC cessation group at 48 weeks off treatment (17.8% vs. 36.7%, p = 0.007). The virological relapse rate positively correlated with HBsAg levels in the NUC cessation group. The interferon monotherapy group had a lower cumulative clinical relapse rate (7.8% vs. 20.9%, p = 0.008) and a higher HBsAg loss rate (21.5% vs. 9.0%, p = 0.03) than the NUC cessation group.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching from NUC to PegIFN-α-2a treatment for 48 weeks significantly reduces virological relapse rates and leads to higher HBsAg loss rates than NUC treatment cessation alone in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

Nucleo(s)tide analogue (NUC) cessation can lead to HBsAg clearance but also a high rate of virological relapse, but an optimized scheme to reduce the virological relapse rate after NUC withdrawal is yet to be reported. This randomized-controlled trial investigated the effect of switching from NUC to PegIFN-α-2a treatment for 48 weeks on virological relapse up to week 96 in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. The interferon monotherapy group had a significantly lower cumulative virological relapse rate (20.8% vs. 53.6%, p <0.0001) and higher HBsAg loss rate (21.5% vs. 9.0%, p = 0.03) than the NUC cessation group up to week 96. This provides an optimized strategy for NUC cessation in HBeAg-negative patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02594293.

Higher Relapse Rate in HBeAg-Negative Patients After Cessation of Tenofovir Alafenamide Compared With Entecavir or Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate

INTRODUCTION

There is limited information comparing the off-therapy relapse rates of patients discontinued tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) to those stopping entecavir or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF).

METHODS

A total of 805 hepatitis B e antigen-negative patients without cirrhosis receiving entecavir (n = 406), TDF (n = 260), or TAF (n = 139) were enrolled. Propensity score matching method was applied to eliminate the significant differences in clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidences of virological relapse, clinical relapse, and retreatment at 96 weeks were higher in the off-TAF group (89.6%, 70.3%, and 59.2%, respectively) than that in the off-entecavir group (65.9%, 42.8%, and 28.8%, respectively) or the off-TDF group (73.7%, 49.8%, and 35.7%, respectively). The median time to clinical relapse was much earlier for off-TAF patients than for off-entecavir or off-TDF (median 14, 57, and 26 weeks, respectively), and these findings persisted even after propensity score matching. Multivariate analysis indicated that TAF therapy was an independent risk factor of virological relapse, clinical relapse, and retreatment when compared with entecavir or TDF. Hepatitis B surface antigen levels at end of treatment were predictive of virological, but not clinical, relapse in the off-TAF group, although this group had a lower rate of severe hepatitis on clinical relapse than the off-TDF group. Finally, there was no significant difference in the hepatic decompensation rate among the entecavir, TDF, and TAF groups.

DISCUSSION

There is an earlier and higher hepatitis B virus relapse rate in patients who discontinue TAF therapy than in comparable patients discontinuing entecavir or TDF therapy. Close monitoring is necessary after TAF withdrawal, particularly in the first 3 months.

ELISA genotyping of hepatitis B virus in China with antibodies specific for genotypes B and C

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) causes hepatitis B (HB) and distinct HBV genotypes can lead to different prognoses. However, HBV genotyping is rarely done in clinics, because the traditional method by PCR-based DNA sequencing is impractical for clinical diagnosis with tedious process and low success rate. Herein, we have established an ELISA-based genotyping method to quickly determine the HBV genotypes of HB patients in China. First, two commercial antibodies, 16D12 and 6H3 specific for HBV genotypes B and C respectively, are chosen as capture antibodies, since these two genotypes dominate in China. Then two home-made genotype-specific antibodies, B19 and C04, are used as the detection antibodies for genotypes B and C in sandwiched ELISA. The ELISA kit shows high sensitivity (> 95%) and specificity (> 95%) in detecting genotypes B and C of Chinese HB patients. Moreover, the ELISA kit has demonstrated higher success rate (98.7%) than PCR-based DNA sequencing (93.5%) and a commercial PCR-based genotyping kit (92.2%) for sera with HBV DNA ≥ 1000 IU/mL and HBsAg ≥ 250 IU/mL. Such an advantage is more obvious for the sera with HBV DNA < 1000 IU/mL. The kappa analysis between the ELISA and PCR-based DNA sequencing results exhibits a kappa of 0.836, indicating a good correlation.

Assessment of hepatitis B virus relapse in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy with prophylactic nucleos(t)ide analogues: Implications for overall mortality

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

We aimed to explore the risk factors associated with virological and clinical relapse, as well as their impact on overall mortality, in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected patients receiving nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUCs) therapy prior to chemotherapy initiation.

METHODS

From 2010 to 2020, we conducted a prospective cohort study involving patients with HBV infection undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy. We utilized the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard regression models to assess risk factors.

RESULTS

We observed that TDF or TAF (HR: 2.16, 95% CI 1.06-4.41; p = .034), anthracycline (HR: 1.73, 95% CI 1.10-2.73; p = .018), baseline HBV DNA (HR: 1.55, 95% CI 1.33-1.81; p < .001) and end-of-treatment HBsAg titre >100 IU/mL (HR: 7.81, 95% CI 1.94-31.51; p = .004) were associated with increased risk of virological relapse. Additionally, TDF or TAF (HR: 4.91, 95% CI 1.45-16.64; p = .011), baseline HBV DNA (HR: 1.48, 95% CI 1.10-1.99; p = .009) and end-of-treatment HBsAg titre >100 IU/mL (HR: 6.09, 95% CI .95-38.87; p = .056) were associated with increased risk of clinical relapse. Furthermore, we found that virological relapse (HR: 3.32, 95% CI 1.33-8.32; p = .010) and clinical relapse (HR: 3.59, 95% CI 1.47-8.80; p = .005) significantly correlated with all-cause mortality in HBV patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy with prophylactic NUCs therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of virological and clinical relapse was linked to baseline HBV DNA, end-of-treatment HBsAg levels and TDF or TAF for prophylaxis; additionally, experiencing relapse heightens the risk of all-cause mortality. Further research is warranted to explore potential strategies for preventing virological and clinical relapse in high-risk patients.

Discontinuation of Nucleos(t)ide Analogues in HBeAg Negative Chronic Hepatitis B Patients: Risks and Benefits

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) remains a major threat to global public health, affecting 296 million people worldwide. Although there is no curative treatment for CHB today, the virus can be effectively controlled with current antiviral treatment strategies. Since HBsAg loss can rarely (1%) be achieved with current nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) options, lifelong treatment is usually required in HBeAg-negative patients. In recent years, guidelines have stated that long-term NA treatments can be discontinued for HBeAg-negative patients without achieving HBsAg loss. There is no general consensus on how discontinuation of NA can be included in the treatment approach. This review aimed to evaluate the current literature regarding the discontinuation of NA treatment in HBeAg-negative patients. Patients with HBeAg-negative CHB who have a higher chance of response after discontinuation of NA therapy can be defined as non-cirrhotic patients who have low HBsAg, HBcrAg, and HBV RNA levels at the discontinuation of treatment and accept close follow-up. The management of relapses that develop after NA discontinuation in patients is also unclear. The agent used in NA treatment itself may also affect the pattern of relapse development. Relapse after NA treatment occurs significantly slower and less frequently with entecavir compared to other regimens, including tenofovir dipivoxil. Prospective studies are needed in order to maintain the chance of HBsAg clearance in case of exacerbation and to treat acute exacerbations that can be fatal in a timely manner. Algorithms to be developed for use after discontinuation of NA treatment will help the clinician manage the patient safely.

Hepatitis B relapse after entecavir or tenofovir alafenamide cessation under anti-viral prophylaxis for cancer chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

No study has comparing hepatitis B virus (HBV) relapse rates among patients with both cancer and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who completed anti-viral prophylaxis for chemotherapy and then stopped taking entecavir or tenofovir alafenamide (TAF).

METHODS

A total of 227 HBeAg-negative cancer patients without cirrhosis who previously took entecavir (n = 144) or TAF (n = 83) for antiviral prophylaxis were enrolled.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of virological and clinical relapse at 2 years was 37% and 10.4%, respectively, in the entecavir group, and 46.7% and 19.5%, respectively, in the TAF group. The multivariate analysis revealed that the use of hematologic malignancy, TAF use, and high-viremia group at baseline were independent risk factors for virological relapse, and use of rituximab, TAF use, higher FIB-4 index and high-viremia group at baseline were independent risk factors for clinical relapse. After propensity score-matching, the patients who discontinued TAF therapy still exhibited higher virological (P = 0.031) and clinical relapse rates (P = 0.012) than did those who discontinued entecavir therapy. The patients were allocated to high- (> 2000 IU/mL), moderate- (between 20 and 2000 IU/mL) and low- (< 20 IU/mL) viremia groups. In the high-viremia group, those who had taken TAF for antiviral prophylaxis had higher rates of virological and clinical relapse than did those who had taken entecavir; in the moderate- and low-viremia groups, no significant difference in virological and clinical relapse rates was detected between the entecavir and TAF groups. Three patients experienced hepatic decompensation upon clinical relapse. All three patients were lymphoma and underwent rituximab therapy. One patient developed acute on chronic liver failure and died even though timely retreatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with both cancer and CHB who underwent antiviral prophylaxis, TAF use was associated with a higher chance of HBV relapse than entecavir use after nucleos(t)ide analogue cessation, particularly in the high-viremia group. Patients who are hematologic malignancy and undergo a rituximab-containing cytotoxic therapy should be monitored closely after withdrawal from prophylactic NA treatment.

Hepatitis Flares or Hepatic Decompensation after Discontinuation of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Entecavir in Non-Cirrhotic Hepatitis B e Antigen-Negative Patients

Hepatic events can occur after discontinuing antiviral therapy. We investigated factors associated with hepatitis flares and hepatic decompensation after discontinuing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and entecavir (ETV). Hepatitis flares within 6 months and hepatic decompensation were compared between non-cirrhotic hepatitis B e antigen-negative patients after discontinuing TDF or ETV by using the Cox proportional hazard model. The cumulative rates of hepatitis flare at 6 months after discontinuing ETV and TDF were 2% and 19%, respectively (p < 0.001). The respective rates of hepatic decompensation at 6 months were 0% and 7% (p = 0.009). Higher alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (AASLD criteria) at the end of treatment (EOT) (HR = 4.93; p = 0.001), an off-therapy dynamic change in HBV DNA (rapid rebound of HBV DNA from the nadir, ≥1 log10 IU/mL per month) (HR = 10.7; p < 0.001), and the discontinuation of TDF (HR = 6.44; p = 0.006) were independently associated with hepatitis flares within 6 months. Older age (HR = 1.06; p < 0.001) and an off-therapy dynamic change in HBV DNA (HR = 3.26; p = 0.028) were independently associated with hepatic decompensation after the discontinuation of antiviral therapy. In summary, we demonstrated several factors associated with hepatitis flares and hepatic decompensation after discontinuing antiviral therapy in non-cirrhotic hepatitis B e antigen-negative patients.

Safety considerations for withdrawal of nucleos(t)ide analogues in patients with chronic hepatitis B: First, do no harm

Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) are widely used to treat hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, but they cannot eradicate the virus and treatment duration can be lifelong if the endpoint is set at seroclearance of the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). As an alternative strategy, finite NA therapy without the prerequisite of HBsAg seroclearance has been proposed to allow treatment cessation in patients with sustained undetectable HBV viremia for two to three years. However, reactivation of viral replication almost always follows NA withdrawal. Whereas HBV reactivation might facilitate HBsAg seroclearance in some, it could lead to serious acute flare-ups in a certain proportion of patients. Occurrence and consequences of NA withdrawal flares are complicated with various factors involving the virus, host, and treatment. Accurate risk prediction for severe flares following NA cessation is essential to ensure patient safety. The risks of life-threatening flares in patients who discontinued NA according to the stopping rules of current guidelines or local reimbursement policies have recently been quantitatively estimated in large-scale studies, which also provided empirical evidence to help identify vulnerable patients at risk of devastating outcomes. Moreover, risk predictors were further explored and validated to hopefully aid in patient selection and management. In this narrative review with a focus on patient safety, we summarize and discuss current literature on the incidence of severe flares following NA cessation, risk stratification for candidate selection, rules of posttreatment monitoring, and indications for treatment resumption. We also share our thoughts on the limitations of existing knowledge and suggestions for future research.

Lifetime risk of liver-related outcomes and determinants in male inactive carriers of chronic hepatitis B

The full spectrum of risks for the life course of inactive hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers remains unclear. In this study, 995 untreated HBV carriers (median age: 42.8 years; median follow-up: 30.2 years) were included. Their data were sourced from a population-based cohort study of male civil servants recruited in 1989-1992. Outcomes were identified by active follow-up examinations and linkage with national health insurance research database. At baseline, 483 subjects were inactive carriers, 385 with indeterminate phase, and 127 with other phases. The joint lifetime risk for incident cirrhosis, decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver-related deaths was lower for inactive carriers compared to subjects in other phases (p < 0.0001). There was a trend of increase in incidence among inactive carriers; the 5-, 10-, and 20-year cumulative incidences were 1.86%, 6.03%, and 10.07%, respectively. Of the inactive carriers, 37.7% cleared HBsAg and 36.6% had biochemical relapse during the study. Biochemical relapse, obesity, and advanced age were predictors for disease progression in inactive carriers. Virological relapse was the predominant cause of biochemical relapse. Higher HBV-DNA levels (≥1000 copies/mL or 200 IU/mL) and HBV genotype B (vs. C) were associated with higher virological relapse rate. After 30 years, we found that one-time measure of inactive carrier state continued to have the lowest risk compared with other infection phases. Despite a more favorable prognosis, inactive carriers had a non-negligible risk. Our findings of lifetime risk may provide important clues for the management of such patients and consideration of therapeutic strategies aiming to achieve functional cure.

Tenofovir versus entecavir on the prognosis of hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma after surgical resection: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Nucleot(s)ide analog treatment (entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir (TDF)) is reported to be associated with decreased tumor recurrence and death in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, yet further work is needed to evaluate the different efficacies of these two agents on the prognosis of early-stage HBV-related HCC patients after curative liver resection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From July 2017 to January 2019, 148 patients with HBV-related HCC who underwent curative liver resection were randomized to receive TDF ( n =74) or ETV ( n =74) therapy. The primary end point was tumor recurrence in the intention-to-treat population. Overall survival and tumor recurrence of patients were compared by multivariable-adjusted Cox regression and competing risk analyses.

RESULTS

During the follow-up with continued antiviral therapy, 37 (25.0%) patients developed tumor recurrence, and 16 (10.8%) patients died ( N =15) or received liver transplantation ( N =1). In the intention-to-treat cohort, the recurrence-free survival for the TDF group was significantly better than that for the ETV group ( P =0.026). In the multivariate analysis, the relative risks of recurrence and death/liver transplantation for ETV therapy were 3.056 (95% CI: 1.015-9.196; P =0.047) and 2.566 (95% CI: 1.264-5.228; P =0.009), respectively. Subgroup analysis of the PP population indicated a better overall survival and RFS of patients receiving TDF therapy ( P =0.048; hazard ratio (HR) =0.362; 95% CI: 0.132-0.993 and P =0.014; HR =0.458; 95% CI: 0.245-0.856). Additionally, TDF therapy was an independent protective factor against late tumor recurrence ( P =0.046; (HR)=0.432; 95% CI: 0.189-0.985) but not against early tumor recurrence ( P =0.109; HR =1.964; 95% CI: 0.858-4.494).

CONCLUSION

HBV-related HCC patients treated with consistent TDF therapy had a significantly lower risk of tumor recurrence than those treated with ETV after curative treatment.

Higher rate of HBsAg loss after discontinuation of tenofovir than entecavir in patients with chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To compare the rates of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss after discontinuation of entecavir versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) without cirrhosis.

METHODS

A total of 891 patients who received entecavir (n = 556) or TDF (n = 335) followed up post-treatment for at least 12 months were retrospectively assessed. A total of 677 patients who had continued entecavir or TDF therapy for at least 4 years were enrolled as the continued group.

RESULTS

Patients who discontinued TDF had higher rates of virological and clinical relapse and retreatment than patients who discontinued entecavir in both the HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative subgroups. In the entire discontinued cohort, the cumulative rates of HBsAg loss at 7 years were 22.6% and 35.4% in the entecavir and TDF groups respectively. Patients who discontinued TDF had significantly higher rates of HBsAg loss than patients who discontinued entecavir therapy in all (p = 0.019) and propensity score-matched (p = 0.015) patients, especially among the subgroups who achieved a sustained response (p < 0.001). Cox regression analysis revealed that TDF, longer treatment duration and lower HBsAg levels at end of treatment were independently associated with HBsAg loss in the entire discontinued group. The incidence of HBsAg loss was significantly higher in the discontinued group than in the continued group after propensity score matching (p < 0.001), including HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who discontinued TDF had significantly higher rates of HBsAg loss than patients who discontinued entecavir, especially among the subgroups without HBV relapse after cessation of therapy.

A review of epidemiology and clinical relevance of Hepatitis B virus genotypes and subgenotypes

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a global public health burden, affecting nearly 300 million people around the world. Due to HBV population is considered to be represented as a viral quasispecies with genetic diversity, some reports showed that different genotypes of HBV have different viral effects, though the emergence of antiviral drugs that effectively inhibit viral replication, however, HBV infection has still not been eradicated and further research is needed.

SUMMARY

HBV has been classified into at least ten genotypes (A-J)  and more than 40 subgenotypes based on an intergroup or intragroup nucleotide difference across the whole genome, respectively. Inter genotypic recombinants were also observed during the HBV evolution. HBV genotypes and subgenotypes have distinct ethno-geographical distributions, as well as evident differences in their biological characteristics. HBV genotypes and subgenotypes also have close association with disease severity, long-term clinical outcomes, and response to antiviral therapy.

KEYMESSAGES

In this review, we up-dated the epidemiological characteristics, clinical features and prognosis of HBV infection with dissimilar genotype/subgenotypes, to better understanding and developing individualized prevention and treatment strategies.

Lower pretreatment HBV DNA levels are associated with better off-treatment outcomes after nucleo(s)tide analogue withdrawal in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B: A multicentre cohort study

Background & Aims

Pretreatment predictors of finite nucleo(s)tide analogue (NUC) therapy remain elusive. We studied the association between pretreatment HBV DNA levels and outcomes after therapy cessation.

Methods

Patients with chronic hepatitis B who were HBeAg negative at the start of NUC treatment were enrolled from sites in Asia and Europe. We studied the association between pretreatment HBV DNA levels and (1) clinical relapse (defined as HBV DNA >2,000 IU/ml + alanine aminotransferase >2 × the upper limit of normal or retreatment) and (2) HBsAg loss after NUC withdrawal.

Results

We enrolled 757 patients, 88% Asian, 57% treated with entecavir, with a median duration of treatment of 159 (IQR 156-262) weeks. Mean pretreatment HBV DNA levels were 5.70 (SD 1.5) log IU/ml and were low (<20,000 IU/ml) in 150 (20%) and high (>20,000 IU/ml) in 607 (80%). The cumulative risk of clinical relapse at 144 weeks after therapy cessation was 22% among patients with pretreatment HBV DNA levels <20,000 IU/ml vs. 60% among patients with pretreatment HBV DNA levels >20,000 IU/ml, whereas the cumulative probabilities of HBsAg loss were 17.5% vs. 5% (p <0.001). In multivariable analysis, pretreatment HBV DNA levels <20,000 IU/ml were independently associated with a reduced likelihood of clinical relapse (adjusted hazard ratio 0.379, p <0.001) and with an increased chance of HBsAg loss (adjusted hazard ratio 2.872, p <0.001).

Conclusions

Lower pretreatment HBV DNA levels are associated with a lower risk of clinical relapse and a higher chance of HBsAg loss after cessation of NUC therapy, independent of end-of-treatment viral antigen levels. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings in non-Asian populations.

Impact and Implications

A subgroup of patients with chronic hepatitis B may not require retreatment after stopping antiviral therapy. In this study, comprising 757 patients with chronic hepatitis B from Europe and Asia, we found that higher viral load before initiation of treatment was a risk factor for relapse after stopping treatment. Patients with a low HBV DNA level before starting antiviral therapy had the lowest risk of relapse, and a high chance of HBsAg loss, after stopping treatment. These findings can help select patients for treatment withdrawal and guide intensity of off-treatment monitoring.

Combined baseline HBcrAg and end-of-treatment HBsAg predict HBV relapse after entecavir or tenofovir cessation

BACKGROUND

For patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), the optimal stopping criteria for entecavir or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate treatment remain unclear.

METHODS

This study recruited CHB patients with levels of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) <100 IU/mL at the end of treatment (EOT) from Kaohsiung (n = 190) and Linkou (n = 188) Chang Gung Memorial Hospitals for use as development and validation groups, respectively.

RESULTS

In the development group, 108 patients with HBsAg ≤40 IU/mL were used for analysis of predictors of HBV relapse and HBsAg loss. Multivariate analysis showed that age, nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA)-experienced status, baseline hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) and HBsAg at EOT were associated independently with virological and clinical relapse. An HBsAg level of 20 IU/mL at EOT was the best cut-off value for minimizing HBV relapse. Patients with EOT HBsAg ≤20 IU/mL had lower virological and clinical relapse rates and higher HBsAg loss rates than those with EOT HBsAg 21-40 IU/mL and HBsAg 41-100 IU/mL in the development and validation groups. The virological and clinical relapse rates were very low (5-year rates: 6.5% and 0%, respectively) and HBsAg loss rate was very high (5-year rate: 81.7%) in patients with a combination of baseline HBcrAg ≤4 log U/mL and EOT HBsAg ≤20 IU/mL in the development group.

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of baseline HBcrAg ≤4 log U/mL and EOT HBsAg level ≤20 IU/mL might reduce the risk of HBV relapse and increase HBsAg loss rate, and might be helpful for off-NA follow-up strategy.

HBV relapse rates in patients who discontinue tenofovir disoproxil fumarate with or without switching to tenofovir alafenamide

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The incidence and relapse pattern in patients stopping tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), a prodrug of tenofovir which is more concentrated in hepatocytes, is unknown.

METHODS

HBeAg-negative CHB patients stopping tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) (off-TDF) or who had switched to TAF more than 3 months before discontinuation (off-TAF) were recruited. The propensity score-matching method (PSM) was used, creating a ratio of 1:3 between the off-TAF versus the off-TDF groups to adjust for associated factors.

RESULTS

After PSM, 180 off-TDF and 60 off-TAF patients were analyzed. The cumulative rates of virological and clinical relapse at 52 weeks were 75.1% and 58.5% respectively in the off-TDF group and 91.1% and 61.6% in the off-TAF group. Patients in the off-TAF group had significantly higher rates of virological relapse than those in the off-TDF group (p = 0.021), but not clinical relapse (p = 0.785). Multivariate cox regression analysis showed that off-TAF group was an independent factor for virological relapse, but not clinical relapse. Severity of clinical relapse and hepatic decompensation rate were comparable between off-TDF and off-TAF groups CONCLUSIONS: The off-TAF group had a higher virological relapse rate than the off-TDF group. The difference in clinical relapse pattern and severity was not clinically important between the two groups.

Hepatitis B and Hepatitis D Viruses: A Comprehensive Update with an Immunological Focus

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis delta virus (HDV) are highly prevalent viruses estimated to infect approximately 300 million people and 12-72 million people worldwide, respectively. HDV requires the HBV envelope to establish a successful infection. Concurrent infection with HBV and HDV can result in more severe disease outcomes than infection with HBV alone. These viruses can cause significant hepatic disease, including cirrhosis, fulminant hepatitis, and hepatocellular carcinoma, and represent a significant cause of global mortality. Therefore, a thorough understanding of these viruses and the immune response they generate is essential to enhance disease management. This review includes an overview of the HBV and HDV viruses, including life cycle, structure, natural course of infection, and histopathology. A discussion of the interplay between HDV RNA and HBV DNA during chronic infection is also included. It then discusses characteristics of the immune response with a focus on reactions to the antigenic hepatitis B surface antigen, including small, middle, and large surface antigens. This paper also reviews characteristics of the immune response to the hepatitis D antigen (including small and large antigens), the only protein expressed by hepatitis D. Lastly, we conclude with a discussion of recent therapeutic advances pertaining to these viruses.

Advances in Immunotherapy for Hepatitis B

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a hepatotropic virus with the potential to cause chronic infection, and it is one of the common causes of liver disease worldwide. Chronic HBV infection leads to liver cirrhosis and, ultimately, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The persistence of covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) and the impaired immune response in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) has been studied over the past few decades. Despite advances in the etiology of HBV and the development of potent virus-suppressing regimens, a cure for HBV has not been found. Both the innate and adaptive branches of immunity contribute to viral eradication. However, immune exhaustion and evasion have been demonstrated during CHB infection, although our understanding of the mechanism is still evolving. Recently, the successful use of an antiviral drug for hepatitis C has greatly encouraged the search for a cure for hepatitis B, which likely requires an approach focused on improving the antiviral immune response. In this review, we discuss our current knowledge of the immunopathogenic mechanisms and immunobiology of HBV infection. In addition, we touch upon why the existing therapeutic approaches may not achieve the goal of a functional cure. We also propose how combinations of new drugs, and especially novel immunotherapies, contribute to HBV clearance.

On-therapy HBsAg kinetics can predict HBsAg loss after nucleos(t)ide analogues interruption in HBeAg-negative patients. The cup is half full and half empty

BACKGROUND

Nucleos(t)ide analogues withdrawal may improve HBsAg loss rates. However, conditions to select patients are not well established.

AIMS

to evaluate the impact of HBsAg kinetics before treatment interruption on post-treatment response.

METHODS

Longitudinal, ambispective study in non-cirrhotic chronic hepatitis B HBeAg-negative patients, analysing on-treatment and post-treatment HBsAg kinetics. On-treatment HBsAg kinetics diagnostic accuracy (AUROC) to identify HBsAg loss was evaluated.

RESULTS

52 HBeAg-negative patients stopped treatment after 8.2 years, and 6 (11.5%) achieved HBsAg loss one year after withdrawal. Multivariate analysis showed that on-treatment HBsAg kinetics was related to HBsAg loss (OR=0.10; 95%CI=0.016-0.632; p = 0.014) with a high diagnostic accuracy (AUROC=0.935). A significant HBsAg decline ≥1 log10 IU/mL showed a positive and negative predictive value of 50% and of 97.6%, respectively. After treatment interruption, HBsAg decline speed (log10 IU/mL/year) accelerated in patients treated >6 years (from -0.06 to -0.20, p<0.05) and remained stable in treated <6 years (from -0.12 to -0.12 p=ns).

CONCLUSIONS

On-treatment HBsAg kinetics can predict post-treatment HBsAg loss rate. Half of patients with a significant HBsAg decline can eliminate HBsAg the first year after withdrawal. Post-treatment HBsAg decline is faster not only in patients who lost the HBsAg but also in those who remain HBsAg-positive.

Differential Relapse Patterns After Discontinuation of Entecavir vs Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in Chronic Hepatitis B

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Whether entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) differentially affect relapse and outcomes following treatment discontinuation across different patient subpopulations remains unclear. We aimed to compare rates of off-therapy hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss, virological and clinical relapse, and retreatment between chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who discontinued TDF or ETV therapy.

METHODS

This study included 1402 virally suppressed CHB patients who stopped either ETV (n = 981) or TDF (n = 421) therapy between 2001 and 2020 from 13 participating centers across North America, Europe, and Asia. All patients were hepatitis B e antigen-negative at treatment discontinuation. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance the treatment groups. Outcomes were analyzed using survival methods.

RESULTS

During a median off-treatment follow-up of 18 months, HBsAg loss occurred in 96 (6.8%) patients overall. Compared with ETV, TDF was associated with a higher rate of HBsAg loss (P = .03); however, the association was no longer significant after statistical adjustment (P = .61). Virological relapse occurred earlier among TDF-treated patients (P < .01); nonetheless, rates became comparable after the first year off therapy (P = .49). TDF was significantly associated with a higher clinical relapse rate than ETV throughout follow-up (P < .01). The development of a virological or clinical relapse did not affect the rate of HBsAg loss. Retreatment rates were not significantly different between the treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

TDF and ETV have differential relapse patterns but are associated with similar rates of HBsAg loss and retreatment following discontinuation. Finite therapy can be considered for CHB patients on either TDF or ETV therapy.

Predictors of Virological Suppression After Clinical Relapse in Patients Who Discontinued Entecavir or Tenofovir

BACKGROUND

The predictors of persistent virological suppression after clinical relapse remain unclear.

AIMS

To investigate the predictors of retreatment or persistent virological suppression after clinical relapse in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who discontinued entecavir or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF).

METHODS

A total of 243 hepatitis B e antigen-negative CHB patients without cirrhosis who experienced clinical relapse after entecavir or TDF cessation were enrolled.

RESULTS

Of the 243 CHB patients, 192 received retreatment and 51 did not receive retreatment after clinical relapse. Of the 51 patients without retreatment, 23 achieved persistent virological suppression (persistent HBV DNA < 2000 IU/mL at least 2 years) and 10 experienced hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss. The Cox regression analysis showed that short consolidation duration, short duration of the first clinical relapse from the end of treatment (EOT), and high bilirubin and HBV DNA levels at the first clinical relapse were independent predictors of retreatment. Long duration of the first clinical relapse from the EOT and low HBsAg levels at the first clinical relapse were independent factors of patients with persistent virological suppression. The rates of persistent virological suppression at the first clinical relapse among patients with HBsAg < 100 and ≥ 100 IU/mL were 44.4% (12/27) and 5.1% (11/216) (P < 0.001), respectively. Baseline HBsAg levels and no retreatment requirement were independent factors associated with HBsAg loss.

CONCLUSIONS

The HBsAg of 100 IU/mL at the first clinical relapse could predict persistent virological suppression after clinical relapse in patients who discontinued entecavir or TDF therapy.

Severe Acute Exacerbation After Cessation of Nucleos(t)ide Analog for Chronic Hepatitis B: A Real-World Study of Routine Practice

There is an ongoing debate as to whether patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) may discontinue nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) therapy before seroclearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg).1 Whereas treatment discontinuation may facilitate HBsAg seroclearance and avoid indefinite drug exposure,2 reactivation of viral replication almost always follows treatment cessation and frequently leads to clinical flares.3 In patients who encounter withdrawal flares, severe acute exacerbation (SAE) could occur with fatal consequences.4 Quantitative knowledge about the risk of SAE is imperative to inform the debate and also the practice.

Probability of HBsAg loss after nucleo(s)tide analogue withdrawal depends on HBV genotype and viral antigen levels

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Nucleo(s)tide analogue (NUC) withdrawal may result in HBsAg clearance in a subset of patients. However, predictors of HBsAg loss after NUC withdrawal remain ill-defined.

METHODS

We studied predictors of HBsAg loss in a global cohort of HBeAg-negative patients with undetectable HBV DNA who discontinued long-term NUC therapy. Patients requiring retreatment after treatment cessation were considered non-responders.

RESULTS

We enrolled 1,216 patients (991 with genotype data); 98 (8.1%) achieved HBsAg loss. The probability of HBsAg loss was higher in non-Asian patients (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 8.26, p <0.001), and in patients with lower HBsAg (aHR 0.243, p <0.001) and HBV core-related antigen (HBcrAg) (aHR 0.718, p = 0.001) levels. Combining HBsAg (<10, 10-100 or >100 IU/ml) and HBcrAg (<2log vs. ≥2 log) levels improved prediction of HBsAg loss, with extremely low rates observed in patients with HBsAg >100 IU/ml with detectable HBcrAg. HBsAg loss rates also varied with HBV genotype; the highest rates were observed for genotypes A and D, and none of the patients with HBV genotype E experienced HBsAg loss (p <0.001 for the overall comparison across genotypes; p <0.001 for genotypes A/D vs. genotypes B/C). HBV genotype C was independently associated with a higher probability of HBsAg loss when compared to genotype B among Asian patients (aHR 2.494; 95% CI 1.490-4.174, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The probability of HBsAg loss after NUC cessation varies according to patient ethnicity, HBV genotype and end-of-treatment viral antigen levels. Patients with low HBsAg (<100 IU/ml) and/or undetectable HBcrAg levels, particularly if non-Asian or infected with HBV genotype C, appear to be the best candidates for treatment withdrawal.

LAY SUMMARY

A subset of patients may achieve clearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) - so-called functional cure - after withdrawal of nucleo(s)tide analogue therapy. In this multicentre study of 1,216 patients who discontinued antiviral therapy, we identified non-Asian ethnicity, HBV genotype C, and low hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis B core-related antigen levels as factors associated with an increased chance of HBsAg loss.

Biomarkers for predicting nucleos(t)ide analogs discontinuation and hepatitis B virus recurrence after drug withdrawal in chronic hepatitis B patients

AIM

To summarize HBV-related biomarkers predicting nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) discontinuation and hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after drug withdrawal in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients, providing references for clinical medication, so as to manage CHB patients more scientifically.

METHODS

Related pieces of literature were retrieved in PubMed and the results were sorted out. We then analyzed and summarized these articles.

RESULTS

We found that HBV related biomarkers maybe could predict NAs withdrawal safely and the possibility of relapse after treatment cessation, including hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg), hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), HBV DNA, HBV RNA, pregenomic-RNA (pgRNA), hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg), hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc), and models containing several indicators for predicting the effectiveness of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

HBV DNA, HBV RNA, pgRNA, HBcrAg, anti-HBc, as well as the prediction models formed by several biomarkers could predict the safe discontinuation of NAs before HBsAg loss and recurrence.

Community-Based Screening for Hepatitis B and C Infectivity Using Two Quantitative Antigens to Identify Endemic Townships

Screening and linkage to care are essential to achieve viral hepatitis elimination before 2030. The accurate identification of endemic areas is important for controlling diseases with geographic aggregation. Viral activity drives prognosis of chronic hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus infection. This screening was conducted in Chiayi County from 2018–2019. All residents aged 30 years or older were invited to participate in quantitative HBsAg (qHBsAg) and HCV Ag screening. Among the 4010 participants (male:female = 1630:2380), the prevalence of qHBsAg and HCV Ag was 9.9% (396/4010) and 4.1% (163/4010), respectively. High-prevalence townships were identified, three for qHBsAg > 15% and two for HCV Ag > 10%. The age-specific prevalence of qHBsAg was distributed in an inverse U-shape with a peak (16.0%, 68/424) for subjects in their 40 s; for HCV, prevalence increased with age. Concentrations of qHBsAg < 200 IU/mL were found in 54% (214/396) of carriers. The rate of oral antiviral treatment for HCV was 75.5% (114/151), with subjects younger than 75 years tending to undergo treatment (85.6% vs. 57.4%, p < 0.001). QHBsAg and HCV Ag core antigens can reflect the concentration of the viral load, which serves as a feasible screening tool. Using quantitative antigen screening for hepatitis B and C in community-based screening, two hyperendemic townships were identified from an endemic county.

Earlier and higher rate of hepatitis B virus relapse after discontinuing tenofovir versus entecavir in HBeAg-positive patients

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the incidence and predictors of hepatitis B virus (HBV) relapse in patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who discontinued entecavir or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF).

METHODS

A total of 205 and 111 HBeAg-positive patients without cirrhosis who had stopped entecavir or TDF treatment, respectively, for at least 6 months were recruited.

RESULTS

In the entire cohort, patients with HBeAg seroconversion during treatment and propensity score (PS)-matched patients, patients who discontinued TDF had significantly higher rates of virological and clinical relapse than patients who discontinued entecavir therapy. Multivariate analysis identified TDF were independently associated with virological and clinical relapse in the entire cohort and subgroups analysis. Patients with HBeAg loss without anti-HBe antibody formation during treatment had significantly higher rates of off-therapy HBV relapse and HBeAg seroreversion than patients with HBeAg seroconversion during treatment. The HBcrAg level at end of treatment (EOT) was independently associated with HBV relapse and HBeAg seroreversion in all patients and patients with HBeAg seroconversion during treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

TDF therapy, HBeAg loss without seroconversion during treatment and higher HBcrAg levels at EOT are significant predictors of HBV relapse in HBeAg-positive patients who discontinued entecavir or TDF.

[CDK1, CCNB1 and NDC80 are associated with prognosis and progression of hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma: a bioinformatic analysis]

OBJECTIVE

To identify the key genes involved in the transformation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) into hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and explore the underlying molecular mechanisms.

METHODS

We analyzed the mRNA microarray data of 119 HBV-related HCC tissues and 252 HBV-related non-tumor tissues in GSE55092, GSE84044 and GSE121248 from the GEO database, and the "sva" R package was used to remove the batch effects. Integration analysis was performed to identify the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in HBV-related liver cancer and liver tissues with HBV infection. The significant DEGs were functionally annotated using GO and KEGG analyses, and the most important modules and hub genes were explored with STRING analysis. Kaplan-Meier and Oncomine databases were used to verify the HCC gene expression data in the TCGA database to explore the correlations of the hub genes with the occurrence, progression and prognosis of HCC. We also examined the expressions of the hub genes in 17 pairs of surgical specimens of HCC and adjacent tissues using RT-qPCR.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 121 DEGs and 3 genetic markers in HCC (P < 0.01). These DEGs included cyclin1 (CDK1), cyclin B1 (CCNB1), and nuclear division cycle 80 (NDC80), which participated in cell cycle, pyrimidine metabolism and DNA replication and were highly correlated (P < 0.05). Analysis of the UALCAN database confirmed high expressions of these 3 genes in HCC tissues, which were correlated with a low survival rate of the patients, as shown by Kaplan-Meier analysis of the prognostic data from the UALCAN database. CDK1, CCNB1 and NDC80 were all correlated with the clinical grading of HCC (P < 0.05). The results of RT-qPCR on the surgical specimens verified significantly higher expressions of CDK1, CCNB1 and NDC80 mRNA in HCC tissues than in the adjacent tissues.

CONCLUSION

CDK1, CCNB1 and NDC80 genes can be used as prognostic markers of HBV-related HCC and may serve as potential targets in preclinical studies and clinical treatment of HCC.

APASL guidance on stopping nucleos(t)ide analogues in chronic hepatitis B patients

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is currently incurable. Long-term treatment with potent and safe nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) can reduce hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cirrhosis-related complications through profound viral suppression. However, indefinite therapy raises several crucial issues with pros and cons. Because seroclearance of hepatitis B surface (HBsAg) as functional cure is not easily achievable, a finite therapy including sequential 48-week pegylated interferon therapy may provide an opportunity to facilitate HBsAg seroclearance by the rejuvenation of exhausted immune cells. However, the cost of stopping NA is the high incidence of virological relapse and surge of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, which may increase the risk of adverse outcomes (e.g., decompensation, fibrosis progression, HCC, or liver-related mortality). So far, the APASL criteria to stop NA treatment is undetectable HBV DNA levels with normalization of ALT; however, this criterion for cessation of treatment is associated with various incidence rates of virological/clinical relapse and more than 40% of NA-stoppers eventually receive retreatment. A very intensive follow-up strategy and identification of low-risk patients for virological/clinical relapse by different biomarkers are the keys to stop the NA treatment safely. Recent studies suggested that decreasing HBsAg level at the end-of-treatment to < 100-200 IU/mL seems to be a useful marker for deciding when to discontinue NAs therapy. In addition, several viral and host factors have been reviewed for their potential roles in predicting clinical relapse. Finally, the APASL guidance has proposed rules to stop NA and the subsequent follow-up strategy to achieve a better prognosis after stopping NA. In general, for both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients who have stopped treatment, these measurements should be done every 1-3 months at the minimum until 12 months.