Early Dynamics of MELD Scores Predict Corticosteroid Responsiveness to Severe Acute-Onset Autoimmune Hepatitis

Acute presentation of autoimmune hepatitis -from acute hepatitis to ALF and ACLF

Acute presentation of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) occurs in 22-43% of all AIH cases, and is not a rare condition. Rather than constituting a single disease entity, it represents a clinical spectrum characterized by considerable variability in severity and the presence of preexisting chronic AIH. This spectrum ranges from acute AIH and acute severe AIH to AIH presenting as acute liver failure (ALF) or as acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), contingent upon factors such as coagulopathy, hepatic encephalopathy, and underlying liver disease. Diagnosing acute presentation of AIH can be particularly challenging due to the frequent absence of classical serologic signatures such as autoantibodies and elevated IgG levels. Histopathological examination remains essential for diagnosis, typically necessitating percutaneous or transjugular liver biopsy. Corticosteroids (CS) are recommended for the management of acute AIH and acute severe AIH with coagulopathy. However, the therapeutic response to CS should be meticulously monitored. If a poor response is anticipated, liver transplantation (LT) should be promptly considered. For AIH presenting as ALF with encephalopathy or ACLF with advanced underlying liver disease, LT is generally advised. Nonetheless, there is potential for a trial of CS therapy in cases of ALF with low MELD scores or ACLF without encephalopathy. This review provides an overview of the latest findings concerning the definition, diagnosis, and management of acute presentation of AIH.

Outcomes of patients with acute severe autoimmune hepatitis: Predictors of non-response to corticosteroids and need for liver transplantation

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Acute severe autoimmune hepatitis (AS-AIH) is an evolving concept and the outcomes and optimal treatment have been less studied. In this study, we aimed to investigate the outcomes of patients with AS-AIH and predictors of non-response to corticosteroid therapy and need for liver transplantation.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort, we included patients with AS-AIH admitted to our liver center. We defined AS-AIH based on the international autoimmune hepatitis group score as acute presentation of AIH with an international normalized ratio (INR) ≥ 1.5 and without liver cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy. All patients received high dose corticosteroid therapy. Treatment response was defined as liver transplant free survival at 4 months after presentation. Factors associated with response to corticosteroids and survival of patients were studied.

RESULTS

In total, 61 patients with AS-AIH were included. Forty-seven patients responded to corticosteroid therapy. In the multivariate regression model, baseline INR (odds ratio [OR]: 0.184; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.048-0.699; p = 0.013) and delayed versus early initiation of corticosteroid (after vs. before 5 days of presentation) (OR: 0.189; 95% CI: 0.039-0.919; p = 0.039) were independent predictors of clinical non-response to corticosteroid therapy. In the multivariable Cox regression model, baseline INR level (OR: 2.542; 95% CI: 1.188-5.440; p = 0.016) and delayed initiation of corticosteroids (OR: 3.578; 95% CI: 1.084-11.812; p = 0.036) were independent predictors of liver transplant free survival at 6 months after diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Delayed initiation of corticosteroid therapy might be predictive of clinical non-response to medical therapy and need for liver transplantation in patients with AS-AIH.

Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver clinical practice guidelines on liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is a highly complex and challenging field of clinical practice. Although it was originally developed in western countries, it has been further advanced in Asian countries through the use of living donor liver transplantation. This method of transplantation is the only available option in many countries in the Asia-Pacific region due to the lack of deceased organ donation. As a result of this clinical situation, there is a growing need for guidelines that are specific to the Asia-Pacific region. These guidelines provide comprehensive recommendations for evidence-based management throughout the entire process of liver transplantation, covering both deceased and living donor liver transplantation. In addition, the development of these guidelines has been a collaborative effort between medical professionals from various countries in the region. This has allowed for the inclusion of diverse perspectives and experiences, leading to a more comprehensive and effective set of guidelines.

Identifying the early predictors of non-response to steroids in patients with flare of autoimmune hepatitis causing acute-on-chronic liver failure

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Early identification of non-response to steroids is critical in patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) causing acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). We assessed if this non-response can be accurately identified within first few days of treatment.

METHODS

Patients with AIH-ACLF without baseline infection/hepatic encephalopathy were identified from APASL ACLF research consortium (AARC) database. Diagnosis of AIH-ACLF was based mainly on histology. Those treated with steroids were assessed for non-response (defined as death or liver transplant at 90 days for present study). Laboratory parameters, AARC, and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores were assessed at baseline and day 3 to identify early non-response. Utility of dynamic SURFASA score [- 6.80 + 1.92*(D0-INR) + 1.94*(∆%3-INR) + 1.64*(∆%3-bilirubin)] was also evaluated. The performance of early predictors was compared with changes in MELD score at 2 weeks.

RESULTS

Fifty-five out of one hundred and sixty-five patients (age-38.2 ± 15.0 years, 67.2% females) with AIH-ACLF [median MELD 24 (IQR: 22-27); median AARC score 7 (6-9)] given oral prednisolone 40 (20-40) mg per day were analyzed. The 90 day transplant-free survival in this cohort was 45.7% with worse outcomes in those with incident infections (56% vs 28.0%, p = 0.03). The AUROC of pre-therapy AARC score [0.842 (95% CI 0.754-0.93)], MELD [0.837 (95% CI 0.733-0.94)] score and SURFASA score [0.795 (95% CI 0.678-0.911)] were as accurate as ∆MELD at 2 weeks [0.770 (95% CI 0.687-0.845), p = 0.526] and better than ∆MELD at 3 days [0.541 (95% CI 0.395, 0.687), p < 0.001] to predict non-response. Combination of AARC score > 6, MELD score > 24 with SURFASA score ≥ - 1.2, could identify non-responders at day 3 (concomitant- 75% vs either - 42%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Baseline AARC score, MELD score, and the dynamic SURFASA score on day 3 can accurately identify early non-response to steroids in AIH-ACLF.