1
|
Wang XJ, Thakur E, Shapiro J. Non-pharmaceutical treatments for irritable bowel syndrome. BMJ 2024; 387:e075777. [PMID: 39681399 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2023-075777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2024]
Abstract
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic disorder of gut-brain interaction that impacts a significant portion of the population and is associated with substantial morbidity, reduced quality of life, and economic impact globally. The pathophysiology of IBS is complex and incompletely understood, and the heterogeneity of IBS is reflected in the variety of pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical therapies utilized for the management of IBS. Given limitations with pharmaceutical treatments, many patients with IBS seek non-pharmaceutical options. Several non-pharmaceutical treatments such as the low FODMAP diet and brain-gut behavior interventions such as gut directed hypnosis and cognitive behavioral therapy are now considered standard of care and are part of all major guidelines for the treatment of IBS. However, challenges with access to and optimal implementation of these therapies remain. This review focuses on the current evidence for common non-pharmaceutical treatments for IBS, including the latest advances in dietary and brain-gut behavioral care, in addition other complementary and integrative health practices and emerging therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elyse Thakur
- Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Burton-Murray H, Sella AC, Gydus JE, Atkins M, Palmer LP, Kuhnle MC, Becker KR, Breithaupt LE, Brigham KS, Aulinas A, Staller K, Eddy KT, Misra M, Micali N, Thomas JJ, Lawson EA. Medical Comorbidities, Nutritional Markers, and Cardiovascular Risk Markers in Youth With ARFID. Int J Eat Disord 2024; 57:2167-2175. [PMID: 38940228 DOI: 10.1002/eat.24243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2024] [Revised: 06/03/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is common among populations with nutrition-related medical conditions. Less is known about the medical comorbidity/complication frequencies in youth with ARFID. We evaluated the medical comorbidities and metabolic/nutritional markers among female and male youth with full/subthreshold ARFID across the weight spectrum compared with healthy controls (HC). METHOD In youth with full/subthreshold ARFID (n = 100; 49% female) and HC (n = 58; 78% female), we assessed self-reported medical comorbidities via clinician interview and explored abnormalities in metabolic (lipid panel and high-sensitive C-reactive protein [hs-CRP]) and nutritional (25[OH] vitamin D, vitamin B12, and folate) markers. RESULTS Youth with ARFID, compared with HC, were over 10 times as likely to have self-reported gastrointestinal conditions (37% vs. 3%; OR = 21.2; 95% CI = 6.2-112.1) and over two times as likely to have self-reported immune-mediated conditions (42% vs. 24%; OR = 2.3; 95% CI = 1.1-4.9). ARFID, compared with HC, had a four to five times higher frequency of elevated triglycerides (28% vs. 12%; OR = 4.0; 95% CI = 1.7-10.5) and hs-CRP (17% vs. 4%; OR = 5.0; 95% CI = 1.4-27.0) levels. DISCUSSION Self-reported gastrointestinal and certain immune comorbidities were common in ARFID, suggestive of possible bidirectional risk/maintenance factors. Elevated cardiovascular risk markers in ARFID may be a consequence of limited dietary variety marked by high carbohydrate and sugar intake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Burton-Murray
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Neurointestinal Health, Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Mass General Brigham Eating Disorders Research Collaborative, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Aluma Chovel Sella
- The Jesse Z. and Sara Lea Shafer Institute of Endocrinology and Diabetes, National Center for Childhood Diabetes, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Petah Tikva, Israel
- Neuroendocrine Unit, Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Julia E Gydus
- Neuroendocrine Unit, Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Eating Disorders Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Micaela Atkins
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Neurointestinal Health, Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lilian P Palmer
- Eating Disorders Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Megan C Kuhnle
- Neuroendocrine Unit, Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Eating Disorders Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kendra R Becker
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Mass General Brigham Eating Disorders Research Collaborative, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Eating Disorders Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lauren E Breithaupt
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Mass General Brigham Eating Disorders Research Collaborative, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Eating Disorders Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kathryn S Brigham
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Mass General Brigham Eating Disorders Research Collaborative, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Anna Aulinas
- Department of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, IR-SANTPAU, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER Unidad 747), ISCIII, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Medicine, University of Vic - Central University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Kyle Staller
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Neurointestinal Health, Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kamryn T Eddy
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Mass General Brigham Eating Disorders Research Collaborative, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Eating Disorders Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Madhusmita Misra
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Mass General Brigham Eating Disorders Research Collaborative, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nadia Micali
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
- Center for Eating and Feeding Disorders Research, Psychiatric Centre Ballerup, Mental Health Services in the Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Institute of Biological Psychiatry, Mental Health Center Sct. Hans, Mental Health Services Copenhagen, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Jennifer J Thomas
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Mass General Brigham Eating Disorders Research Collaborative, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Eating Disorders Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Lawson
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Mass General Brigham Eating Disorders Research Collaborative, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Neuroendocrine Unit, Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Burton-Murray H, Kiser K, Gurung J, Williams K, Thomas JJ, Khalili H. Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Symptoms Are Not as Frequent as Other Eating Disorder Symptoms When Ulcerative Colitis Is in Remission. J Crohns Colitis 2024; 18:1510-1513. [PMID: 38635299 PMCID: PMC11369070 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Recent studies have shown that up to 53% of patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] screen positive for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder [ARFID]. There is however concern that ARFID screening rates are over-inflated in patients with active disease. We aimed to evaluate the frequency and characteristics of ARFID symptoms using the Nine Item ARFID Screen [NIAS], and to use another eating disorder measure, the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire 8 [EDE-Q8], to rule-out/characterise other eating disorder cognitive and behavioural symptoms. METHODS Participants included adults with UC who are enrolled in an ongoing cohort study with quiescent UC (Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index [SCCAI] ≤2 or faecal calprotectin <150 µg/g with corticosteroid-free clinical remission for ≥3 months) at baseline. We used self-reported data on demographics, gastrointestinal medications, medical comorbidities, NIAS scores, and EDE-Q-8 scores. RESULTS We included 101 participants who completed the NIAS at their baseline cohort assessment [age 49.9 ± 16.5 years; 55% female]. Eleven participants [11%] screened positively for ARFID on at least one NIAS subscale [n = 8 male]. Up to 30 participants [30%] screened positive for other eating disorder symptoms [EDE-Q-8 Global ≥2.3]. Overall score distributions on the EDE-Q-8 showed that participants scored highest on the Weight Concern and Shape Concern subscales. CONCLUSIONS Among adults with UC in remission, we found a low rate of ARFID symptoms by the NIAS but a high rate of positive screens for other eating disorder symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Burton-Murray
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Katheryn Kiser
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jenny Gurung
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Katherine Williams
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jennifer J Thomas
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Eating Disorders Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hamed Khalili
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hussein H, Van Remoortel S, Boeckxstaens GE. Irritable bowel syndrome: When food is a pain in the gut. Immunol Rev 2024; 326:102-116. [PMID: 39037230 DOI: 10.1111/imr.13374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/23/2024]
Abstract
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic gastrointestinal condition associated with altered bowel habits and recurrent abdominal pain, often triggered by food intake. Current treatments focus on improving stool pattern, but effective treatments for pain in IBS are still lacking due to our limited understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms. Visceral hypersensitivity (VHS), or abnormal visceral pain perception, underlies abdominal pain development in IBS, and mast cell activation has been shown to play an important role in the development of VHS. Our work recently revealed that abdominal pain in response to food intake is induced by the sensitization of colonic pain-sensing neurons by histamine produced by activated mast cells following a local IgE response to food. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on abdominal pain and VHS pathophysiology in IBS, we outline the work leading to the discovery of the role of histamine in abdominal pain, and we introduce antihistamines as a novel treatment option to manage chronic abdominal pain in patients with IBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hind Hussein
- Center for Intestinal Neuro-Immune Interactions, Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism, and Ageing (CHROMETA), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Samuel Van Remoortel
- Center for Intestinal Neuro-Immune Interactions, Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism, and Ageing (CHROMETA), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Guy E Boeckxstaens
- Center for Intestinal Neuro-Immune Interactions, Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism, and Ageing (CHROMETA), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Weeks I, Abber SR, Thomas JJ, Calabrese S, Kuo B, Staller K, Murray HB. The Intersection of Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction With Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder. J Clin Gastroenterol 2023; 57:651-662. [PMID: 37079861 PMCID: PMC10623385 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
High rates of overlap exist between disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) and eating disorders, for which common interventions conceptually conflict. There is particularly increasing recognition of eating disorders not centered on shape/weight concerns, specifically avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) in gastroenterology treatment settings. The significant comorbidity between DGBI and ARFID highlights its importance, with 13% to 40% of DGBI patients meeting full criteria for or having clinically significant symptoms of ARFID. Notably, exclusion diets may put some patients at risk for developing ARFID and continued food avoidance may perpetuate preexisting ARFID symptoms. In this review, we introduce the provider and researcher to ARFID and describe the possible risk and maintenance pathways between ARFID and DGBI. As DGBI treatment recommendations may put some patients at risk for developing ARFID, we offer recommendations for practical treatment management including evidence-based diet treatments, treatment risk counseling, and routine diet monitoring. When implemented thoughtfully, DGBI and ARFID treatments can be complementary rather than conflicting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imani Weeks
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Sophie R. Abber
- Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL
| | - Jennifer J. Thomas
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Eating Disorders Clinical and Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Samantha Calabrese
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Center for Neurointestinal Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Braden Kuo
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Center for Neurointestinal Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Kyle Staller
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Center for Neurointestinal Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Helen Burton Murray
- Center for Neurointestinal Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Eating Disorders Clinical and Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Burton Murray H, Weeks I, Becker KR, Ljótsson B, Madva EN, Eddy KT, Staller K, Kuo B, Thomas JJ. Development of a brief cognitive-behavioral treatment for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in the context of disorders of gut-brain interaction: Initial feasibility, acceptability, and clinical outcomes. Int J Eat Disord 2023; 56:616-627. [PMID: 36550697 PMCID: PMC9992156 DOI: 10.1002/eat.23874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) symptoms are common (up to 40%) among adults with disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI), but treatments for this population (DGBI + ARFID) have yet to be evaluated. We aimed to identify initial feasibility, acceptability, and clinical effects of an exposure-based cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT) for adults with DGBI + ARFID. METHODS Patients (N = 14) received CBT as part of routine care in an outpatient gastroenterology clinic. A two-part investigation of the CBT included a retrospective evaluation of patients who were offered a flexible (8-10) session length and an observational prospective study of patients who were offered eight sessions. Feasibility benchmarks were ≥75% completion of sessions, quantitative measures (for treatment completers), and qualitative interviews. Acceptability was assessed with a benchmark of ≥70% patients reporting a posttreatment satisfaction scores ≥3 on 1-4 scale and with posttreatment qualitative interviews. Mixed model analysis explored signals of improvement in clinical outcomes. RESULTS All feasibility and acceptability benchmarks were achieved (and qualitative feedback revealed high satisfaction with the treatment and outcomes). There were improvements in clinical outcomes across treatment (all p's < .0001) with large effects for ARFID fear (-52%; Hedge's g = 1.5; 95% CI = 0.6, 2.5) and gastrointestinal-specific anxiety (-42%; Hedge's g = 1.0; 95% CI = 0.5, 16). Among those who needed to gain weight (n = 10), 94%-103% of expected weight gain goals were achieved. DISCUSSION Initial development and testing of a brief 8-session CBT protocol for DGBI + ARFID showed high feasibility, acceptability, and promising clinical improvements. Findings will inform an NIH Stage 1B randomized control trial. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE While cognitive-behavioral treatments (CBTs) for ARFID have been created in outpatient feeding and eating disorder clinics, they have yet to be developed and refined for other clinic settings or populations. In line with the recommendations for behavioral treatment development, we conducted a two-part investigation of an exposure-based CBT for a patient population with high rates of ARFID-adults with disorders of gut-brain interaction (also known as functional gastrointestinal disorders). We found patients had high satisfaction with treatment and there were promising improvements for both gastrointestinal and ARFID outcomes. The refined treatment includes eight sessions delivered by a behavioral health care provider and the findings reported in this article will be studied next in an NIH Stage 1B randomized controlled trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Burton Murray
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, 401 Park Drive, Boston, MA 02215
- Center for Neurointestinal Health, Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Wang 5, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Imani Weeks
- Center for Neurointestinal Health, Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Wang 5, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Kendra R. Becker
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, 401 Park Drive, Boston, MA 02215
- Eating Disorders Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, 2 Longfellow Place, Suite 200, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Brjánn Ljótsson
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Psychology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Elizabeth N Madva
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, 401 Park Drive, Boston, MA 02215
- Center for Neurointestinal Health, Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Wang 5, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Kamryn T Eddy
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, 401 Park Drive, Boston, MA 02215
- Eating Disorders Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, 2 Longfellow Place, Suite 200, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Kyle Staller
- Center for Neurointestinal Health, Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Wang 5, Boston, MA 02114
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Braden Kuo
- Center for Neurointestinal Health, Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Wang 5, Boston, MA 02114
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Jennifer J. Thomas
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, 401 Park Drive, Boston, MA 02215
- Eating Disorders Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, 2 Longfellow Place, Suite 200, Boston, MA 02114
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Atkins M, Zar-Kessler C, Madva EN, Staller K, Eddy KT, Thomas JJ, Kuo B, Murray HB. History of trying exclusion diets and association with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in neurogastroenterology patients: A retrospective chart review. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2023; 35:e14513. [PMID: 36600490 PMCID: PMC11262773 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Revised: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Exclusion diets for gastrointestinal symptom management have been hypothesized to be a risk factor for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID; a non-body image-based eating disorder). In a retrospective study of pediatric and adult neurogastroenterology patients, we aimed to (1) identify the prevalence and characteristics of an exclusion diet history and (2) evaluate if an exclusion diet history was concurrently associated with the presence of ARFID symptoms. METHODS We conducted a chart review of 539 consecutive referrals (ages 6-90, 69% female) to adult (n = 410; January-December 2016) and pediatric (n = 129; January 2016-December 2018) neurogastroenterology clinics. Masked coders (n = 4) retrospectively applied DSM-5 criteria for ARFID and a separate coder assessed documentation of exclusion diet history. We excluded patients with no documentation of diet in the chart (n = 35) or who were not orally fed (n = 9). RESULTS Of 495 patients included, 194 (39%) had an exclusion diet history, and 118 (24%) had symptoms of ARFID. Of reported diets, dairy-free was the most frequent (45%), followed by gluten-free (36%). Where documented, exclusion diets were self-initiated by patients/parents in 66% of cases, and recommended by gastroenterology providers in 30%. Exclusion diet history was significantly associated with the presence of ARFID symptoms (OR = 3.12[95% CI 1.92-5.14], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS History of following an exclusion diet was common and was most often patient-initiated among pediatric and adult neurogastroenterology patients. As patients with self-reported exclusion diet history were over three times as likely to have ARFID symptoms, providers should be cognizant of this potential association when considering dietary interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Micaela Atkins
- Center for Neurointestinal Health, Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Wang 5, Boston, MA 02114
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Claire Zar-Kessler
- Center for Neurointestinal Health, Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Wang 5, Boston, MA 02114
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Elizabeth N. Madva
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, 401 Park Drive, Boston, MA 02215
- Center for Neurointestinal Health, Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Wang 5, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Kyle Staller
- Center for Neurointestinal Health, Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Wang 5, Boston, MA 02114
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Kamryn T. Eddy
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, 401 Park Drive, Boston, MA 02215
- Eating Disorders Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, 2 Longfellow Place, Suite 200, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Jennifer J. Thomas
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, 401 Park Drive, Boston, MA 02215
- Eating Disorders Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, 2 Longfellow Place, Suite 200, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Braden Kuo
- Center for Neurointestinal Health, Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Wang 5, Boston, MA 02114
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Helen Burton Murray
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, 401 Park Drive, Boston, MA 02215
- Center for Neurointestinal Health, Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Wang 5, Boston, MA 02114
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Staller K, Paz M, Rones R, Macklin EA, Garcia-Fischer I, Murray HB, Kuo B. Virtual Tai Chi program for patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation: Proof-of-concept feasibility trial. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2022; 34:e14429. [PMID: 35833716 PMCID: PMC11294908 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Revised: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 06/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Satisfaction with current treatment options for irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) is low, with many patients turning to complementary treatments. Tai Chi is a mind-body medicine practice with proven efficacy in other functional disorders. As a proof-of-concept, we tested the feasibility and preliminary clinical outcomes associated with a Tai Chi program designed for IBS-C. METHODS A total of 27 IBS-C patients participated in a single-arm trial of 8 sessions of Tai Chi delivered weekly over 7 weeks via live videoconferencing in group format. Clinical improvement was assessed via change in IBS Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS) from baseline to 4 weeks posttreatment (week 11) with secondary outcomes exploring symptom ratings, IBS-related quality of life (IBS-QOL), GI-specific anxiety, abdominal distention, and psychological factors. KEY RESULTS Despite substantial dropout (n = 7; 26%), the treatment protocol had moderate to excellent feasibility for other criteria. Treatment satisfaction was excellent. Exit interviews confirmed high satisfaction with the program among completers, but a high burden of data collection was noted. One participant experienced an adverse event (mild, exacerbation of sciatica). There was a significant improvement in intra-individual IBS-SSS between baseline and posttreatment (average change -66.5, 95% CI -118.6 to -14.3, p = 0.01). Secondary outcomes were notable for improvements in other IBS symptom scoring measures, IBS-QOL, measured abdominal diameter, and leg strength. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES Our data provide preliminary evidence of the feasibility of a Tai Chi intervention for IBS-C, show promise for improving outcomes, and identify more streamlined data collection as an area for further program improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle Staller
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Neurointestinal Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mary Paz
- Institute of Health Professions, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Ramel Rones
- Mind Body Consultant, Tufts Medical Center, Mass General Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Eric A. Macklin
- Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School Boston, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Isabelle Garcia-Fischer
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Neurointestinal Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Helen Burton Murray
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Neurointestinal Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Braden Kuo
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Neurointestinal Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Biesiekierski JR, Manning LP, Murray HB, Vlaeyen JWS, Ljótsson B, Van Oudenhove L. Review article: exclude or expose? The paradox of conceptually opposite treatments for irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2022; 56:592-605. [PMID: 35775328 PMCID: PMC11327802 DOI: 10.1111/apt.17111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2022] [Revised: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a heterogeneous disorder of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) maintained by interacting biological, psychological, and social processes. Interestingly, there are two contrasting yet evidence-based treatment approaches for reducing IBS symptoms: exclusion diets such as those low in fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAPs) and exposure-based cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT). Exclusion diets recommend patients avoid foods thought to be symptom-inducing, whereas exposure-based CBT encourages patients to expose themselves to foods. AIMS To address the paradox of conceptually opposite exclusion diets and exposure-based CBT for IBS. METHODS In this conceptual review, we describe the rationale, practical implementation, evidence base and strengths and weaknesses of each treatment. We conducted up-to-date literature search concerning the low FODMAP diet and CBT, and performed a secondary analysis of a previously conducted trial to illustrate a key point in our review. RESULTS The low FODMAP diet has demonstrated efficacy, but problems with adherence, nutritional compromise, and heightened gastrointestinal-specific anxiety raise caution. Exposure-based CBT has demonstrated efficacy with substantial evidence for gastrointestinal-specific anxiety as a key mechanism of action. Mediation analysis also showed that increased FODMAP intake mediated decreased symptom severity in exposure-based CBT. However, there is minimal evidence supporting which treatment "works best for whom" and how these approaches could be best integrated. CONCLUSIONS Even though exclusion diets and exposure-based CBT are conceptually opposite, they each have proven efficacy. Clinicians should familiarise themselves with both treatments. Further research is needed on predictors, mechanisms and moderators of treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica R Biesiekierski
- Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, Monash University, Notting Hill, Australia
- Department of Food, Nutrition and Dietetics, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Lauren P Manning
- Department of Food, Nutrition and Dietetics, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Helen Burton Murray
- Center for Neurointestinal Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Johan W S Vlaeyen
- Research Group Health Psychology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Research Group Experimental Health Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Brjánn Ljótsson
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Psychology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lukas Van Oudenhove
- Laboratory for Brain-Gut Axis Studies (LaBGAS), Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism (CHROMETA), University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience Lab, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Psychological Considerations in the Dietary Management of Patients With DGBI. Am J Gastroenterol 2022; 117:985-994. [PMID: 35404301 PMCID: PMC9169764 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
In this article, an expert team of 2 gastro-psychologists, a dietician, and an academic gastroenterologist provides insights into the psychological and social implications of evidence-based and "popular" dietary interventions in disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). We focus on practical approaches for evaluating a patient's appropriateness for a dietary intervention, considering the nutritional, psychological, behavioral, and social context in which a patient may find themselves managing their DGBI with dietary intervention. We also discuss how to identify risk factors for and symptoms of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder, a growing concern in the DGBI population.
Collapse
|