The Impact of the Social Determinants of Health on Disparities in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

White Paper: American Gastroenterological Association Position Statement: The Future of IBD Care in the United States-Removing Barriers and Embracing Opportunities

Despite incredible growth in systems of care and rapidly expanding therapeutic options for people with inflammatory bowel disease, there are significant barriers that prevent patients from benefiting from these advances. These barriers include restrictions in the form of prior authorization, step therapy, and prescription drug coverage. Furthermore, inadequate use of multidisciplinary care and inflammatory bowel disease specialists limits patient access to high-quality care, particularly for medically vulnerable populations. However, there are opportunities to improve access to high-quality, patient-centered care. This position statement outlines the policy and advocacy goals that the American Gastroenterological Association will prioritize for collaborative efforts with patients, providers, and payors.

Is it "all in the bag?" Multidisciplinary perspectives on ostomy surgery in pediatric IBD across the ImproveCareNow network

Objectives

Pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic illness with various treatments, including ostomy surgery. Ostomy-related medical decision-making (MDM) is complex for multidisciplinary healthcare professionals (HCPs). This study sought to understand national multidisciplinary HCPs' perceptions about pediatric IBD ostomy surgery in the United States.

Methods

This cross-sectional REDCap survey recruited HCPs in pediatric IBD HCP roles from the ImproveCareNow (ICN) Learning Health System. The survey gathered data on, (1) demographics, (2) participants' perspectives on patients/families' ostomy perceptions, (3) participants' own perspectives on ostomies, and (4) participants' perspectives on multidisciplinary collaboration in ostomy surgery.

Results

Participants (n = 69, across n = 30 American ICN sites) were 84% White, 62% female, and 54% gastroenterologists. In reflecting on patients/families' perceptions, participants endorsed most (86%) view ostomies as a "failure," various psychosocial concerns (e.g., 97% endorsed body image concerns), and most (81%) have moderate to significant stigma about ostomies. In reflecting on their own perceptions, nearly half (44%) endorsed some to moderate stigma about ostomies and felt ostomy discussions were difficult when families had negative perceptions (88%). Over half (54%) endorsed currently having multidisciplinary care for pediatric IBD surgery. Most (70%) endorsed variability in the amount and/or quality of multidisciplinary collaboration.

Conclusion

MDM related to pediatric IBD ostomy surgery presents nuanced clinical complexities for HCPs. This work underscores interest in multidisciplinary care, notable ostomy-related psychosocial needs, and ostomy-related stigma. Future work should develop systematic approaches to multidisciplinary pediatric IBD ostomy care, bolster psychosocial support, and evaluate how systematic care may impact psychosocial, and healthcare utilization outcomes.

Common Instances of Low-value Care in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Value-based care focuses on improving the quality, effectiveness, and efficiency of health care while controlling costs. Low-value care implies services or interventions that provide little or no benefit to patients, have the potential to cause harm, incur unnecessary cost to patients, or waste limited health care resources. In this review, we discuss common instances of low-value care along the spectrum of management in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). These include low value care in: (1) diagnosis and monitoring of IBD: utilization of serological markers to screen and diagnose IBD, over-reliance on symptoms for monitoring disease, failure to employ treat-to-target strategies in symptomatic patients with IBD, and annual surveillance colonoscopies in patients at low risk of developing dysplasia; (2) treatment of IBD: use of 5-aminosalicylates in Crohn's disease, continuation of 5-aminosalicylates after escalation to immunosuppressive therapy, chronic corticosteroid use without steroid-sparing strategies, step therapy for Crohn's disease, failure to optimize tumor necrosis factor antagonists in patients with active disease and subsequently de-intensification of therapies in those who have achieved stable remission; and (3) management of hospitalized patients with IBD: routine cross-sectional imaging for patients with IBD presenting to the emergency department, withholding pharmacological prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in patients hospitalized with IBD flare, and prolonged use of high-dose intravenous corticosteroids in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis. This review is meant to bring attention to value-based care in IBD and provide guidance to treating practitioners. Future studies on systematic evaluation of high- and low-value care in patients with IBD are warranted.

Racial and ethnic differences in diagnosis age and blood biomarkers in a pediatric inflammatory bowel disease cohort

OBJECTIVE

Prompt diagnosis of pediatric-onset inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is crucial for preventing a complicated disease course; however, it is not well understood how social determinants of health might affect pediatric IBD diagnosis. This study examined differences in diagnosis age, biomarkers of disease severity, and anthropometrics with sociodemographic factors in a pediatric IBD cohort.

METHODS

Pediatric IBD patients (n = 114) and their parents/caregivers were enrolled from the Children's of Alabama Pediatric IBD Clinic in Birmingham, Alabama. Primary analyses examined associations of child race and ethnicity, parental income, parental education, single-parent household status, insurance type, and distance to a tertiary pediatric gastroenterology referral center with diagnosis age. Secondary analyses examined differences in biomarker levels, height, and body mass index at the time of diagnosis.

RESULTS

Racial and ethnic minority children were diagnosed at an older age compared to Non-Hispanic White children (14.4 ± 0.40 vs. 11.7 ± 0.38 years; p < 0.001), and this trend was robust to adjustment with other sociodemographic variables. Parental attainment of a college education attenuated the link between minority race and ethnicity and the likelihood of older age at diagnosis, while other sociodemographic variables had no moderating effect. Racial and ethnic minority children were 5.7 times more likely to have clinically elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate at diagnosis compared to Non-Hispanic White children (p = .024).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that child race and ethnicity may exert a primary effect on the age at diagnosis with pediatric-onset IBD. This study highlights the need for further research on racial and ethnic disparities to promote health equity in pediatric-onset IBD.

Health Care Disparities, Social Determinants of Health, and Emotional Impacts in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: Results from a Global Ulcerative Colitis Narrative Patient Survey

BACKGROUND

The Ulcerative Colitis (UC) Narrative global survey assessed aspects of living with UC. This analysis aimed to identify health care disparities, social determinants of health, and emotional impacts related to UC disease management, patient experience, and quality of life.

METHODS

The survey was conducted by The Harris Poll from August 2017 to February 2018 among adults with UC. Responses from 1000 patients in the United States, Canada, Japan, France, and Finland were analyzed based on patient income, employment status, educational level, age, sex, and psychological comorbidities. Odds ratios (ORs) with significant P values (P < .05) from multivariate logistic regression models are reported.

RESULTS

Low-income vs high-income patients were less likely to have participated in a peer mentoring (OR, 0.30) or UC education program (OR, 0.51). Patients not employed were less likely to report being in "good/excellent" health (OR, 0.58) than patients employed full time. Patients with low vs high educational levels were less likely to have reached out to patient associations/organizations (OR, 0.59). Patients aged younger than 50 years vs those aged 50 years and older were less likely to have visited an office within an inflammatory bowel disease center/clinic in the past 12 months (OR, 0.53). Males were less likely to be currently seeing their gastroenterologist than females (OR, 0.66). Patients with vs without depression were less likely to agree that UC had made them more resilient (OR, 0.51).

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial differences in disease management and health care experience were identified, based on categories pertaining to patient demographics and psychological comorbidities, which may help health care providers better understand and advance health equity to improve patient care.

Are Depression and Anxiety Underdiagnosed in Socially Vulnerable Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease?

INTRODUCTION

Depression and anxiety are highly prevalent among individuals with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); however, little is understood about how social determinants of health (SDOH) may impact mental health diagnoses in this population. The social vulnerability index (SVI) is a publicly available tool that can be used to study SDOH in IBD patients.

METHODS

Home addresses from a retrospective cohort of IBD patients at a single center were used to geocode patients to their individual census tract and corresponding SVI. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine the relationship between SVI and comorbid mental health diagnoses in patients with IBD. Secondarily, data from standardized health questionnaires were then used to determine if patients were adequately screened for depression and anxiety.

RESULTS

In all, 9644 patients were included; 18% had a diagnosis of depression, 21% anxiety, and 32% had a composite of "any mental health diagnosis." Depression (odds ratio [OR], 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.56) but not anxiety (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.71-1.06) nor "any mental health diagnosis" (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.92-1.30) was associated with higher levels of social vulnerability. However, overall rates of screening for depression and anxiety were low (15% and 8%, respectively), with the lowest screening rates among the most socially vulnerable (depression 8.2%, anxiety 6.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Disparities in the diagnoses of depression and anxiety for socially vulnerable patients with IBD exist. Awareness of these inequities is the first step toward developing interventions to improve mental health screening, eliminate barriers and bias, and promote referrals for appropriate mental health management.

Barriers to optimizing inflammatory bowel disease care in the United States

Significant progress in the management and modification of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been made; however, significant barriers to the optimization of IBD care in the United States still exist. The majority of these barriers are constructed by insurance carriers and the integration of market pressures into healthcare decision-making. In this review, we highlight the barriers to IBD care optimization within the context of the US insurance system and review current and proposed solutions.

Systematic review: Individual-level factors and social determinants of health impacting sleep health in individuals with inflammatory bowel disease

AIM

To examine the individual-level factors and social determinants of health (SDOH) linked to sleep health among individuals with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

DESIGN

Systematic review without meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL and PsycINFO) were searched in February 2022.

REVIEW METHODS

Databases were searched with keywords related to IBD and sleep. The review was conducted per the PRISMA protocol. The checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies published by the Joanna Briggs Institute was used for quality appraisal. Factors were organized by individual, social and societal levels according to the social-ecological model of sleep health.

RESULTS

In the review, 45 studies were identified and synthesized. All studies examined individual-level factors with sleep, with age being the most common factor studied. Only nine studies considered a social determinant of health which included marital status, number of children, education level, annual income, employment status, work tenure, type of employment, area of residence, minority status/ethnicity and COVID-19. However, the source of information for the social determinant of health was not clearly defined for more than half of these studies.

CONCLUSION

Although IBD sleep research has explored individual-level factors (i.e. age) that impact sleep health, there is a lack of information on the SDOH that can contribute to sleep health.

IMPACT

This review provides insight into the different factors that have been examined in IBD sleep research. By determining the SDOH that impact sleep, nursing research can inform sustainable and tailored interventions that focus on changing behaviour and improving sleep of individuals of varying backgrounds and life experiences. There is a continued need for nurses in practice and research to explore the SDOH that influence health outcomes and the daily lives of those with IBD.

Health Care Use and Barriers to Care for Chronic Inflammatory Diseases (CID) among First and Second Generation South Asian Immigrant Children and Parents in Ontario Canada

Although immigrants are disproportionately impacted by growing chronic inflammatory disease (CIDs) rates, yet suffer barriers to access health care, little attention has been given to their primary healthcare or specialist healthcare access as it relates to complex, chronic diseases in Canada, a country with universal health care. This study aims to investigate CID health care use and barriers to care among first- and second-generation immigrant South Asian children and parents in the Greater Toronto Area, Ontario. Drawing on analysis of 24 in depth interviews with children and parents (14 children, 10 parents), the results reveal that although CIDs disproportionately affects South Asian immigrants, they encounter health system, geographic, interpersonal, and knowledge barriers to access requisite care. These barriers exist despite participants having a GP, and are compounded further by limited familial systems, culturally insensitive care, and structural inequities that in some instances make parents choose between health access or other basic needs. Although all participants recognized the importance of specialized care, only 11 participants regularly accessed specialized care, creating new schisms in CID management. The findings suggest that a multisectoral approach that address individual and structural level socio-structural drivers of health inequities are needed to create more equitable healthcare access.