Relationship Between the Subcostal and Right Lateral Ultrasound Views of Inferior Vena Cava Collapse: Implications for Clinical Use of Ultrasonography

Inferior vena cava distensibility during pressure support ventilation: a prospective study evaluating interchangeability of subcostal and trans‑hepatic views, with both M‑mode and automatic border tracing

The Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) is commonly utilized to evaluate fluid status in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU),with more recent emphasis on the study of venous congestion. It is predominantly measured via subcostal approach (SC) or trans-hepatic (TH) views, and automated border tracking (ABT) software has been introduced to facilitate its assessment. Prospective observational study on patients ventilated in pressure support ventilation (PSV) with 2 × 2 factorial design. Primary outcome was to evaluate interchangeability of measurements of the IVC and the distensibility index (DI) obtained using both M-mode and ABT, across both SC and TH. Statistical analyses comprised Bland-Altman assessments for mean bias, limits of agreement (LoA), and the Spearman correlation coefficients. IVC visualization was 100% successful via SC, while TH view was unattainable in 17.4% of cases. As compared to the M-mode, the IVC-DI obtained through ABT approach showed divergences in both SC (mean bias 5.9%, LoA -18.4% to 30.2%, ICC = 0.52) and TH window (mean bias 6.2%, LoA -8.0% to 20.4%, ICC = 0.67). When comparing the IVC-DI measures obtained in the two anatomical sites, accuracy improved with a mean bias of 1.9% (M-mode) and 1.1% (ABT), but LoA remained wide (M-mode: -13.7% to 17.5%; AI: -19.6% to 21.9%). Correlation was generally suboptimal (r = 0.43 to 0.60). In PSV ventilated patients, we found that IVC-DI calculated with M-mode is not interchangeable with ABT measurements. Moreover, the IVC-DI gathered from SC or TH view produces not comparable results, mainly in terms of precision.

Alternative Cardiac Point-of-Care Ultrasound Views

Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) and critical care echocardiography (CCE) is increasingly being used in intensive care units (ICUs). POCUS and CCE may be limited in some ICU patients because of inadequate information from standard echocardiographic windows. At the same time, data from POCUS and CCE in ICU may be critical to managing patients with cardiorespiratory failure. Alternative echocardiographic views done at the bedside by ICU practitioners may yield additional information or replace the missing data from the standard views. Information obtained from multiple echocardiographic views should be integrated and interpreted within the patient's other clinical information.

Point-of-Care Echocardiography in the Difficult-to-Image Patient in the ICU: A Narrative Review

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this narrative review was to address common obstacles encountered in the ICU to acquiring quality and interpretable images using point-of-care echocardiography.

DATA SOURCES

Detailed searches were performed using PubMed and Ovid Medline using medical subject headings and keywords on topics related to patient positioning, IV echo contrast, alternative subcostal views, right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) hemodynamics, and point-of-care transesophageal echocardiography. Articles known to the authors were also selected based on expert opinion.

STUDY SELECTION

Articles specific to patient positioning, IV echo contrast, alternative subcostal views, RVOT hemodynamics, and point-of-care transesophageal echocardiography were considered.

DATA EXTRACTION

One author screened titles and extracted relevant data while two separate authors independently reviewed selected articles.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Impediments to acquiring quality and interpretable images in critically ill patients are common. Notably, body habitus, intra-abdominal hypertension, dressings or drainage tubes, postoperative sternotomies, invasive mechanical ventilation, and the presence of subcutaneous emphysema or lung hyperinflation are commonly encountered obstacles in transthoracic image acquisition in the ICU. Despite these obstacles, the bedside clinician may use obstacle-specific maneuvers to enhance image acquisition. These may include altering patient positioning, respiratory cycle timing, expanding the subcostal window to include multilevel short-axis views for use in the assessment of RV systolic function and hemodynamics, coronal transhepatic view of the inferior vena cava, and finally point-of-care transesophageal echocardiography.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite common obstacles to point-of-care echocardiography in critically ill patients, the beside sonographer may take an obstacle-specific stepwise approach to enhance image acquisition in difficult-to-image patients.

Subcostal versus right lateral ultrasound measurements of inferior vena cava: Measurements obtained from these two views are not equivalent in non-ICU patients

Objective

The objective of this study is to assess concordance between the subcostal and right lateral view for ultrasonographic inferior vena cava measurements including the end-inspiratory diameter, end-expiratory diameter and respiratory variation represented by the caval index in spontaneously breathing healthy adults.

Methods

We recruited a convenience sample of 33 healthy adults. A phased array ultrasound probe was used to obtain inferior vena cava measurements from a subcostal view in the sagittal plane and from a right lateral view in the coronal plane with B-mode ultrasound. End-inspiratory diameter, end-expiratory diameter and caval index were obtained for each view. A two-tailed t-test was performed to compare the caval indices obtained by the two views. Bland-Altman analysis was used to obtain the limits of agreement for the inferior vena cava diameter and caval index across the two views.

Results

Subcostal and right lateral caval indices across all participants were significantly different according to a paired t-test (p < 0.0001). The Bland-Altman analysis showed wide limits of agreement in end-inspiratory diameter (-0.97 and 0.50 cm) and in end-expiratory diameter (-0.94 and 0.90 cm). The right lateral view underestimated the inferior vena cava caval index relative to the subcostal view.

Conclusions

The subcostal and right lateral views are not equivalent in obtaining inferior vena cava measurements in spontaneously breathing healthy adults. Current cut-off values for measurement-based applications of inferior vena cava ultrasound, including fluid responsiveness using caval indices, may not be accurate when values are obtained from the right lateral view in the coronal plane of the inferior vena cava in patients.

The effect of continuous positive airway pressure on inferior vena cava collapsibility as measured by bedside ultrasound

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of progressively increasing continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on measurements of the caval index (CI) using bedside ultrasound at the 3 common inferior vena cava (IVC) evaluation sites.

Methods

This was a prospective, observational trial that included 165 healthy adults over 18 years old enrolled between February 2015 and May 2018. Measurements of the IVC were obtained during normal tidal respirations from the subxiphoid area in the long and short axis and from the right mid-axillary line in the long axis. Measurements were obtained in each of these locations at atmospheric pressure and with CPAP at 5, 10, and 15 cmH2O. The CI was then calculated for each of the 3 selected locations at each level of pressure.

Results

As CPAP pressures increased from 0 to 15 cmH2O the CI measurements obtained at the lateral mid-axillary line did not show any statistically significant variation. There was a statistically significant difference (P < 0.001) when comparing measurements of the CI from the lateral mid-axillary line location to both anterior locations. As CPAP pressures increased, the CI calculated from the subxiphoid area in both the anterior short and anterior long axis orientations initially trended upwards at 5 cmH2O, then began to downtrend as the pressures increased to 10 and 15 cmH2O. Comparing the CI measurements from the anterior long and anterior short axis at 0, 5, 10, and 15 cmH2O, there was no statistically significant difference at any pressure (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

When evaluating the IVC in a spontaneously breathing patient, measurements from an anterior orientation are preferred as the lateral mid-axillary view can underestimate CI calculations.

Correlation of Ultrasound-Based Hydration Assessment Measures with CVP and Clinical Hydration Status among Children Admitted to the PICU: A Prospective Observational Study

Purpose This article assesses the correlation of respiratory variation in inferior vena cava (IVC) with central venous pressure (CVP) in children. Secondary objective was to evaluate IVC variability with clinical hydration status.

Methods IVC variability was assessed at the subcostal (SC) and right lateral (RL) region, and collapsibility index (CI) (spontaneously breathing) and distensibility index (DI) (positive pressure) and IVC/aortic ratio were calculated. Partial correlations were calculated between CI/DI with CVP adjusting for body mass index and age. Sensitivity of CI and DI to predict clinical dehydration was calculated using receiver operating characteristic curves.

Results A total of 145 ultrasounds were performed on 72 patients (41% positive pressure). Only RL CI in spontaneously breathing patients strongly correlated with CVP (r = –0.65, p < 0.001). A moderate correlation was observed between CI and DI from SC and RL regions (r's = 0.38 and 0.47). Among spontaneously breathing patients, a significant difference was observed in the SC CI based on hydration status. For patients on positive pressure, IVC/aortic ratio had a significant difference. SC CI had the highest area under the curve (0.82) to detect dehydration with 80% sensitivity/87% specificity for a cutoff of 40%.

Conclusion SC CI is the most reliable measure to assess the hydration status of spontaneously breathing children, while the IVC/aortic ratio performs well for patients under positive pressure. RL CI has strong negative correlation with CVP in spontaneously breathing patients.

Ultrasound assessment of the inferior vena cava in children: A comparison of sub-xiphoid and right lateral coronal views

OBJECTIVES

The inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVCCI) has been used to assess the respiratory variation of the inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter and hence intravascular volume. The sub-xiphoid view (SXV) is the standard view to evaluate the IVC. The right lateral transabdominal view (RLV) has been shown in adults to be an alternative view to evaluate the IVC when the SXV is not feasible. The aim of the study was to compare IVC dimensions from these two views and thus determine whether the RLV view can be used instead of the SXV in pediatric patients.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center prospective observational crossover study. Study subjects were ASA physical status 1-2 children, 1-12 years of age scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia. Anesthesia was maintained by mask with spontaneous ventilation with end-tidal sevoflurane at 2%-5% after the induction of anesthesia. IVCCI was measured using M-mode in both the SXV and RLV.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 50 children with a mean age of 5.1 years. The median value for the IVCCI-sx was 0.45 (IQR: 0.28-0.70) while the IVCCI-rl was 0.30 (0.19-0.5). The mean difference between the two groups was 0.12 (95% CI: 0.177-0.066, p < .001, two-tailed paired t-test). Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was 0.66. The univariate linear regression model was IVCCIsx = 0.21 + 0.77 × IVCCIrl.

CONCLUSIONS

IVCCIrl was lower than IVCCIsx. IVCCI measured from the right lateral view tended to overestimate the patient's fluid-responsiveness and therefore these two values are not interchangeable.

Caudal vena cava collapsibility index as a tool to predict fluid responsiveness in dogs

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the use of the caudal vena cava collapsibility index (CVCCI) as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in hospitalized, critically ill dogs with hemodynamic or tissue perfusion abnormalities.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

SETTING

Private referral center.

ANIMALS

Twenty-seven critically ill, spontaneously breathing dogs with compromised hemodynamics or tissue hypoperfusion.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The electronic medical records were searched for dogs admitted for any cause, from August 2016 to December 2017. We included dogs with ultrasound measurements of: CVCCI, performed at baseline; and velocity time integral (VTI) of the subaortic blood flow, carried out before and after a fluid load. CVCCI was estimated as: (maximum diameter-minimum diameter/maximum diameter) × 100. Dogs in which VTI increased ≥15% were considered fluid responders. The CVCCI accurately predicted fluid responsiveness with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.96 (95% CI, 0.88 to 1.00). The optimal cut-off of CVCCI that better discriminated between fluid responders and nonresponders was 27%, with 100.0% sensitivity and 83.3% specificity. At baseline, fluid responders had lower VTI (5.48 [4.26 to 7.40] vs 10.61 [7.38 to 13.23] cm, P = 0.004) than nonresponders. The basal maximum diameter of the caudal vena cava adjusted to body weight was not different between responders and nonresponders (0.050 [0.030 to 0.100] vs 0.079 [0.067 to 0.140] cm/kg, P = 0.339). The increase in VTI was related to basal CVCCI (R = 0.60, P = 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis showed narrow 95% limits of agreement between measurements of CVCCI and VTI performed by different observers or by the same observer.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this small cohort study suggest that CVCCI can accurately predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill dogs with perfusion abnormalities. Further research is necessary to extrapolate these results to larger populations of hospitalized dogs.

Subcostal versus transhepatic view to assess the inferior vena cava in critically ill patients

BACKGROUND

Evaluation of the inferior vena cava (IVC) is not always possible through the subcostal (SC) window.

METHODS

Inferior vena cava diameters measured by transhepatic (TH) and SC views were compared by Bland and Altman analysis.

RESULTS

131 patients were enrolled, including 88 (67%) under mechanical ventilation. The echogenicity was statistically poorer through the TH view in comparison with the SC view (P = .002). The correlation between the SC and TH views was good and better for respiratory variation than for end-expiratory or end-inspiratory diameter measurements (r = 0.86). Despite low bias, the limits of agreement were wide (-7.5 and 7.7 mm for end-expiratory diameter, -8.7 and 8.5 mm for end-inspiratory diameter, and -5.3 and 5.8 mm for respiratory variation). Complementary analysis showed that the concordance between the SC and the TH views was better when the IVC was distended. However, the limits of agreement remained broad.

CONCLUSIONS

Although feasible in almost all patients, the TH view does not provide better echogenicity in comparison with the SC view. Despite a good correlation with the SC view and a low bias, the limits of agreement were wide, especially when the IVC has an ellipsoidal shape, suggesting caution in the interpretation of data obtained by the TH view.

The Value of the Inferior Vena Cava Area Distensibility Index and its Diameter Ratio for Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

INTRODUCTION

It is necessary to evaluate fluid responsiveness before fluid resuscitation. We evaluated the value of inferior vena cava (IVC) area respiratory variation and the IVC diameter ratio (IVC DR) for predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was performed in the intensive care unit between December 2017 and March 2018. Mechanically ventilated patients were enrolled and received ultrasound monitoring. IVC diameter distensibility index from the subxiphoid area (IVC-sx DDI), IVC diameter distensibility index from the right midaxillary line (IVC-rm DDI), IVC area distensibility index (IVC ADI), and IVC DR in cross-section were calculated by ultrasound monitoring IVC parameters. The enrolled patients were classified as nonresponders group and responders group according to whether the cardiac output increased by >10% after passive leg raising.

RESULTS

Data from 67 mechanically ventilated patients were analyzed. 55.2% of patients had positive fluid responsiveness. The area of receiver operating characteristic curves evaluating the ability of the IVC-sx DDI, IVC-rm DDI, IVC ADI, and IVC DR to predict the fluid responsiveness were 0.702, 0.686, 0.749, and 0.829, respectively. IVC DR level of 1.43 was predictive of positive fluid responsiveness with 90.0% specificity and 67.6% sensitivity. IVC ADI level of 10.2% was predictive of positive fluid responsiveness with 40.0% specificity and 97.3% sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

IVC ADI and its diameter ratio in cross-section had more value than IVC diameter distensibility index for predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients.

Intra-observer and Device-Dependent Inter-observer Reliability of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Muscle Perfusion Quantification

Muscle perfusion quantification by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) may facilitate treatment decisions in musculoskeletal disorders. Translation into clinical routine relies on high intra-observer and inter-observer reliability and transferability between ultrasound devices to enable validation and multicenter studies. This study evaluates these aspects for deltoid muscle perfusion quantification, including possible multicenter study setups. One hundred sixty-six CEUS quantifications were conducted on 42 shoulders. Intra-observer reliability revealed a high intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC, r = 0.91) and low coefficient of variation (CV, 10.28%). Inter-observer reliability revealed an ICC of .84 and a CV of 17.1%, but these values decreased when different ultrasound devices were used (ICC = .60, CV = 18.6%). Re-evaluating subgroups with high sectional plane concordance significantly increased reliability (intra-observer: ICC = .97, CV = 5.49%, inter-observer/same device: ICC = .98, CV = 5.83%, varying devices: ICC = .78, CV = 9.8%). CEUS perfusion quantification of the deltoid seems applicable for multicenter studies, yet pooling different ultrasound devices remains critical. Sectional plane concordance appears to be crucial for reliability and transferability of CEUS muscle perfusion quantifications.

Assessment of Volume Status During Prone Spine Surgery via a Novel Point-of-care Ultrasound Technique

Background Operations performed with the patient in the prone position can pose a significant challenge to the anesthesiologist. Hypotension is a commonly encountered complication. Intravascular volume depletion and decreased cardiac output secondary to decreased preload are thought to be the most likely cause of hypotension in the prone position. Measurement of inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter via point-of-care ultrasound examination (POC_US) has been used to provide an estimate of intravascular volume status. However, this measurement is most often obtained with the patient in the supine position. Materials and methods In this study, we describe a technique for evaluating IVC diameter via POC_US in the prone position. Right lateral long axis imaging of the IVC was used to assess the intravascular volume status of 10 patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery in the prone position. In addition, we used a non-invasive measure of cardiac output to correlate changes in IVC width with changes in cardiac output. Results Images of the IVC in the prone position were obtainable in all 10 patients. IVC diameter increased in six out of 10 patients on going from supine to prone position. The increase in IVC diameter corresponded to an increase in cardiac output, measured noninvasively in five out of the six patients. Conclusions Our findings indicate that POC_US examination of the IVC is possible in the prone position. Further study of a larger patient population could demonstrate the utility of this technique in assessing intravascular volume status in patients undergoing surgery in the prone position.

Size and shape of the inferior vena cava before and after a fluid challenge: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Recent meta-analyses failed to support the reliability of ultrasound assessment of the inferior vena cava (IVC) to predict fluid responsiveness. However, the techniques utilized were heterogeneous. We hypothesized that the variability of the elliptic section and caliber of the IVC along its course may influence ultrasound evaluation. Therefore, we investigated IVC size and shape at four levels, before and after a fluid challenge.

METHODS

Twenty mechanically-ventilated adult patients who received a fluid challenge after cardiac surgery were enrolled. They were regarded as responders if the cardiac index increased more than 15%. Before and after the fluid challenge, IVC anteroposterior (AP) and lateral (LA) diameters, the flat ratio, and the distensibility index were assessed by ultrasound just above the iliac veins, at the confluence of the renal veins, before the confluence of the hepatic veins (where blood flow velocity was also measured), and after it.

RESULTS

At all levels, IVC section was elliptical, so that IVC diameters varied between a minimum and a maximum according to the measurement angle. Such interval increased in correspondence of the renal veins, where IVC section was more eccentric. The distensibility index was higher when assessed on AP diameters. After the fluid challenge, non-responders showed a diffuse increase of AP diameters, whereas responders showed an increase of blood velocity before the confluence of the hepatic veins.

CONCLUSIONS

The elliptic section should be considered when assessing IVC size. AP diameters are shorter and more affected by the respiratory cycle. After a fluid challenge, an increase of blood velocity associated with unchanged AP diameters may suggest fluid responsiveness.