1
|
Abstract
Current lung cancer screening protocols use low-dose computed tomography scans in selected high-risk individuals. Unfortunately, utilization is low, and the rate of false-positive screens is high. Peripheral biomarkers carry meaningful promise in diagnosing and monitoring cancer with added potential advantages reducing invasive procedures and improving turnaround time. Herein, the use of such blood-based assays is considered as an adjunct to further utilization and accuracy of lung cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathaniel Deboever
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Edwin J Ostrin
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Pulmonary Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Mara B Antonoff
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Paez R, Kammer MN, Tanner NT, Shojaee S, Heideman BE, Peikert T, Balbach ML, Iams WT, Ning B, Lenburg ME, Mallow C, Yarmus L, Fong KM, Deppen S, Grogan EL, Maldonado F. Update on Biomarkers for the Stratification of Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules. Chest 2023; 164:1028-1041. [PMID: 37244587 PMCID: PMC10645597 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.05.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Revised: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Early detection and diagnosis are critical, as survival decreases with advanced stages. Approximately 1.6 million nodules are incidentally detected every year on chest CT scan images in the United States. This number of nodules identified is likely much larger after accounting for screening-detected nodules. Most of these nodules, whether incidentally or screening detected, are benign. Despite this, many patients undergo unnecessary invasive procedures to rule out cancer because our current stratification approaches are suboptimal, particularly for intermediate probability nodules. Thus, noninvasive strategies are urgently needed. Biomarkers have been developed to assist through the continuum of lung cancer care and include blood protein-based biomarkers, liquid biopsies, quantitative imaging analysis (radiomics), exhaled volatile organic compounds, and bronchial or nasal epithelium genomic classifiers, among others. Although many biomarkers have been developed, few have been integrated into clinical practice as they lack clinical utility studies showing improved patient-centered outcomes. Rapid technologic advances and large network collaborative efforts will continue to drive the discovery and validation of many novel biomarkers. Ultimately, however, randomized clinical utility studies showing improved patient outcomes will be required to bring biomarkers into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Paez
- Department of Medicine, Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Michael N Kammer
- Department of Medicine, Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Nicole T Tanner
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy and Sleep Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Samira Shojaee
- Department of Medicine, Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Brent E Heideman
- Department of Medicine, Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Tobias Peikert
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Meridith L Balbach
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Wade T Iams
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Boting Ning
- Department of Medicine, Section of Computational Biomedicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Marc E Lenburg
- Department of Medicine, Section of Computational Biomedicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Christopher Mallow
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL
| | - Lonny Yarmus
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Kwun M Fong
- University of Queensland Thoracic Research Centre, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Stephen Deppen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN
| | - Eric L Grogan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN
| | - Fabien Maldonado
- Department of Medicine, Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pritchett MA, Sigal B, Bowling MR, Kurman JS, Pitcher T, Springmeyer SC. Assessing a biomarker's ability to reduce invasive procedures in patients with benign lung nodules: Results from the ORACLE study. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0287409. [PMID: 37432960 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Abstract
A blood-based integrated classifier (IC) has been clinically validated to improve accuracy in assessing probability of cancer risk (pCA) for pulmonary nodules (PN). This study evaluated the clinical utility of this biomarker for its ability to reduce invasive procedures in patients with pre-test pCA ≤ 50%. This was a propensity score matching (PSM) cohort study comparing patients in the ORACLE prospective, multicenter, observational registry to control patients treated with usual care. This study enrolled patients meeting the intended use criteria for IC testing: pCA ≤ 50%, age ≥40 years, nodule diameter 8-30 mm, and no history of lung cancer and/or active cancer (except for non-melanomatous skin cancer) within 5 years. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate invasive procedure use on benign PNs of registry patients as compared to control patients. A total of 280 IC tested, and 278 control patients met eligibility and analysis criteria and 197 were in each group after PSM (IC and control groups). Patients in the IC group were 74% less likely to undergo an invasive procedure as compared to the control group (absolute difference 14%, p <0.001) indicating that for every 7 patients tested, one unnecessary invasive procedure was avoided. Invasive procedure reduction corresponded to a reduction in risk classification, with 71 patients (36%) in the IC group classified as low risk (pCA < 5%). The proportion of IC group patients with malignant PNs sent to surveillance were not statistically different than the control group, 7.5% vs 3.5% for the IC vs. control groups, respectively (absolute difference 3.91%, p 0.075). The IC for patients with a newly discovered PN has demonstrated valuable clinical utility in a real-world setting. Use of this biomarker can change physicians' practice and reduce invasive procedures in patients with benign pulmonary nodules. Trial registration: Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03766958.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Pritchett
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, FirstHealth of the Carolinas & Pinehurst Medical Clinic, Pinehurst, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Barry Sigal
- Southeastern Research Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Mark R Bowling
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Brody School of Medicine, Eastern Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Jonathan S Kurman
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Interventional Pulmonology, Pulmonary Disease, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Trevor Pitcher
- Medical Affairs, Biodesix, Inc., Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yu DH, Shafiq M, Batra H, Johnson M, Griscom B, Chamberlin J, Lofaro LR, Huang J, Bulman WA, Kennedy GC, Yarmus LB, Lee HJ, Feller-Kopman D. Comparing modalities for risk assessment in patients with pulmonary lesions and nondiagnostic bronchoscopy for suspected lung cancer. BMC Pulm Med 2022; 22:442. [PMID: 36434574 PMCID: PMC9700899 DOI: 10.1186/s12890-022-02181-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bronchoscopy is commonly utilized for non-surgical sampling of indeterminant pulmonary lesions, but nondiagnostic procedures are common. Accurate assessment of the risk of malignancy is essential for decision making in these patients, yet we lack tools that perform well across this heterogeneous group of patients. We sought to evaluate the accuracy of three previously validated risk models and physician-assessed risk (PAR) in patients with a newly identified lung lesion undergoing bronchoscopy for suspected lung cancer where the result is nondiagnostic. METHODS We performed an analysis of prospective data collected for the Percepta Bronchial Genomic Classifier Multicenter Registry. PAR and three previously validated risk models (Mayo Clinic, Veteran's Affairs, and Brock) were used to determine the probability of lung cancer (low, intermediate, or high) in 375 patients with pulmonary lesions who underwent bronchoscopy for possible lung cancer with nondiagnostic pathology. Results were compared to the actual adjudicated prevalence of malignancy in each pre-test risk group, determined with a minimum of 12 months follow up after bronchoscopy. RESULTS PAR and the risk models performed poorly overall in the assessment of risk in this patient population. PAR most closely matched the observed prevalence of malignancy in patients at 12 months after bronchoscopy, but all modalities had a low area under the curve, and in all clinical models more than half of all the lesions labeled as high risk were truly or likely benign. The studied risk model calculators overestimate the risk of malignancy compared to PAR, particularly in the subset in older patients, irregularly bordered nodules, and masses > 3 cm. Overall, the risk models perform only slightly better when confined to lung nodules < 3 cm in this population. CONCLUSION The currently available tools for the assessment of risk of malignancy perform suboptimally in patients with nondiagnostic findings following a bronchoscopic evaluation for lung cancer. More accurate and objective tools for risk assessment are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION not applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana H. Yu
- grid.266102.10000 0001 2297 6811Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, USA CA ,grid.413077.60000 0004 0434 9023UCSF Medical Center, 505 Parnassus Ave, 9414 San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Majid Shafiq
- grid.62560.370000 0004 0378 8294Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Boston, MA USA
| | - Hitesh Batra
- grid.265892.20000000106344187Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Birmingham, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
| | - Marla Johnson
- grid.503590.a0000 0004 5345 9448Veracyte, Inc., South San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Bailey Griscom
- grid.503590.a0000 0004 5345 9448Veracyte, Inc., South San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Janna Chamberlin
- grid.503590.a0000 0004 5345 9448Veracyte, Inc., South San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Lori R. Lofaro
- grid.503590.a0000 0004 5345 9448Veracyte, Inc., South San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Jing Huang
- grid.503590.a0000 0004 5345 9448Veracyte, Inc., South San Francisco, CA USA
| | - William A. Bulman
- grid.503590.a0000 0004 5345 9448Veracyte, Inc., South San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Giulia C. Kennedy
- grid.503590.a0000 0004 5345 9448Veracyte, Inc., South San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Lonny B. Yarmus
- grid.21107.350000 0001 2171 9311Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Section of Interventional Pulmonology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA
| | - Hans J. Lee
- grid.21107.350000 0001 2171 9311Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Section of Interventional Pulmonology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA
| | - David Feller-Kopman
- grid.254880.30000 0001 2179 2404Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Raval AA, Benn BS, Benzaquen S, Maouelainin N, Johnson M, Huang J, Lofaro LR, Ansari A, Geurink C, Kennedy GC, Bulman WA, Kurman JS. Reclassification of risk of malignancy with Percepta Genomic Sequencing Classifier following nondiagnostic bronchoscopy. Respir Med 2022; 204:106990. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2022.106990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Revised: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/11/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
|
6
|
Rampariag R, Chernyavskiy I, Al-Ajam M, Tsay JCJ. Controversies and challenges in lung cancer screening. Semin Oncol 2022; 49:S0093-7754(22)00056-2. [PMID: 35907666 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2022.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Revised: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Two large randomized controlled trials have shown mortality benefit from lung cancer screening (LCS) in high-risk groups. Updated guidelines by the United State Preventative Service Task Force in 2020 will allow for inclusion of more patients who are at high risk of developing lung cancer and benefit from screening. As medical clinics and lung cancer screening programs around the country continue to work on perfecting the LCS workflow, it is important to understand some controversial issues surrounding LCS that should be addressed. In this article, we identify some of these issues, including false positive rates of low-dose CT, over-diagnosis, cost expenditure, LCS disparities in minorities, and utility of biomarkers. We hope to provide clarity, potential solutions, and future directions on how to address these controversies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ravindra Rampariag
- Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Medical Service, Veterans Administration (VA) New York Harbor Healthcare System, NY, USA
| | - Igor Chernyavskiy
- Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Medical Service, Veterans Administration (VA) New York Harbor Healthcare System, NY, USA; Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Medical Service, Veterans Administration (VA) Northport Healthcare System, NY, USA
| | - Mohammad Al-Ajam
- Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Medical Service, Veterans Administration (VA) New York Harbor Healthcare System, NY, USA; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep, Department of Medicine, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, NY, USA
| | - Jun-Chieh J Tsay
- Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Medical Service, Veterans Administration (VA) New York Harbor Healthcare System, NY, USA; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep, Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Pulmonary nodules are identified in approximately 1.6 million patients per year in the US and are detected on approximately 30% of computed tomographic (CT) images of the chest. Optimal treatment of an individual with a pulmonary nodule can lead to early detection of cancer while minimizing testing for a benign nodule. OBSERVATIONS At least 95% of all pulmonary nodules identified are benign, most often granulomas or intrapulmonary lymph nodes. Smaller nodules are more likely to be benign. Pulmonary nodules are categorized as small solid (<8 mm), larger solid (≥8 mm), and subsolid. Subsolid nodules are divided into ground-glass nodules (no solid component) and part-solid (both ground-glass and solid components). The probability of malignancy is less than 1% for all nodules smaller than 6 mm and 1% to 2% for nodules 6 mm to 8 mm. Nodules that are 6 mm to 8 mm can be followed with a repeat chest CT in 6 to 12 months, depending on the presence of patient risk factors and imaging characteristics associated with lung malignancy, clinical judgment about the probability of malignancy, and patient preferences. The treatment of an individual with a solid pulmonary nodule 8 mm or larger is based on the estimated probability of malignancy; the presence of patient comorbidities, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and coronary artery disease; and patient preferences. Management options include surveillance imaging, defined as monitoring for nodule growth with chest CT imaging, positron emission tomography-CT imaging, nonsurgical biopsy with bronchoscopy or transthoracic needle biopsy, and surgical resection. Part-solid pulmonary nodules are managed according to the size of the solid component. Larger solid components are associated with a higher risk of malignancy. Ground-glass pulmonary nodules have a probability of malignancy of 10% to 50% when they persist beyond 3 months and are larger than 10 mm in diameter. A malignant nodule that is entirely ground glass in appearance is typically slow growing. Current bronchoscopy and transthoracic needle biopsy methods yield a sensitivity of 70% to 90% for a diagnosis of lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Pulmonary nodules are identified in approximately 1.6 million people per year in the US and approximately 30% of chest CT images. The treatment of an individual with a pulmonary nodule should be guided by the probability that the nodule is malignant, safety of testing, the likelihood that additional testing will be informative, and patient preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Louis Lam
- Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sethi S, Oh S, Chen A, Bellinger C, Lofaro L, Johnson M, Huang J, Bhorade SM, Bulman W, Kennedy GC. Percepta Genomic Sequencing Classifier and decision-making in patients with high-risk lung nodules: a decision impact study. BMC Pulm Med 2022; 22:26. [PMID: 34991528 PMCID: PMC8740045 DOI: 10.1186/s12890-021-01772-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Incidental and screening-identified lung nodules are common, and a bronchoscopic evaluation is frequently nondiagnostic. The Percepta Genomic Sequencing Classifier (GSC) is a genomic classifier developed in current and former smokers which can be used for further risk stratification in these patients. Percepta GSC has the capability of up-classifying patients with a pre-bronchoscopy risk that is high (> 60%) to "very high risk" with a positive predictive value of 91.5%. This prospective, randomized decision impact survey was designed to test the hypothesis that an up-classification of risk of malignancy from high to very high will increase the rate of referral for surgical or ablative therapy without additional intervening procedures while increasing physician confidence. METHODS Data were collected from 37 cases from the Percepta GSC validation cohort in which the pre-bronchoscopy risk of malignancy was high (> 60%), the bronchoscopy was nondiagnostic, and the patient was up-classified to very high risk by Percepta GSC. The cases were randomly presented to U.S pulmonologists in three formats: a pre-post cohort where each case is presented initially without and then with a GSG result, and two independent cohorts where each case is presented either with or without with a GSC result. Physicians were surveyed with respect to subsequent management steps and confidence in that decision. RESULTS One hundred and one survey takers provided a total of 1341 evaluations of the 37 patient cases across the three different cohorts. The rate of recommendation for surgical resection was significantly higher in the independent cohort with a GSC result compared to the independent cohort without a GSC result (45% vs. 17%, p < 0.001) In the pre-post cross-over cohort, the rate increased from 17 to 56% (p < 0.001) following the review of the GSC result. A GSC up-classification from high to very high risk of malignancy increased Pulmonologists' confidence in decision-making following a nondiagnostic bronchoscopy. CONCLUSIONS Use of the Percepta GSC classifier will allow more patients with early lung cancer to proceed more rapidly to potentially curative therapy while decreasing unnecessary intervening diagnostic procedures following a nondiagnostic bronchoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonali Sethi
- Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Mail Code A90, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
| | - Scott Oh
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alexander Chen
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Christina Bellinger
- Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy and Immunologic Disease, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Lori Lofaro
- Veracyte, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Jing Huang
- Veracyte, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Johnson MK, Wu S, Pankratz DG, Fedorowicz G, Anderson J, Ding J, Wong M, Cao M, Babiarz J, Lofaro L, Walsh PS, Kennedy GC, Huang J. Analytical validation of the Percepta genomic sequencing classifier; an RNA next generation sequencing assay for the assessment of Lung Cancer risk of suspicious pulmonary nodules. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:400. [PMID: 33849470 PMCID: PMC8045183 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08130-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bronchoscopy is a common procedure used for evaluation of suspicious lung nodules, but the low diagnostic sensitivity of bronchoscopy often results in inconclusive results and delays in treatment. Percepta Genomic Sequencing Classifier (GSC) was developed to assist with patient management in cases where bronchoscopy is inconclusive. Studies have shown that exposure to tobacco smoke alters gene expression in airway epithelial cells in a way that indicates an increased risk of developing lung cancer. Percepta GSC leverages this idea of a molecular "field of injury" from smoking and was developed using RNA sequencing data generated from lung bronchial brushings of the upper airway. A Percepta GSC score is calculated from an ensemble of machine learning algorithms utilizing clinical and genomic features and is used to refine a patient's risk stratification. METHODS The objective of the analysis described and reported here is to validate the analytical performance of Percepta GSC. Analytical performance studies characterized the sensitivity of Percepta GSC test results to input RNA quantity, the potentially interfering agents of blood and genomic DNA, and the reproducibility of test results within and between processing runs and between laboratories. RESULTS Varying the amount of input RNA into the assay across a nominal range had no significant impact on Percepta GSC classifier results. Bronchial brushing RNA contaminated with up to 10% genomic DNA by nucleic acid mass also showed no significant difference on classifier results. The addition of blood RNA, a potential contaminant in the bronchial brushing sample, caused no change to classifier results at up to 11% contamination by RNA proportion. Percepta GSC scores were reproducible between runs, within runs, and between laboratories, varying within less than 4% of the total score range (standard deviation of 0.169 for scores on 4.57 scale). CONCLUSIONS The analytical sensitivity, analytical specificity, and reproducibility of Percepta GSC laboratory results were successfully demonstrated under conditions of expected day to day variation in testing. Percepta GSC test results are analytically robust and suitable for routine clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shuyang Wu
- Veracyte, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA
| | | | | | | | - Jie Ding
- Veracyte, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA
| | - Mei Wong
- Veracyte, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA
| | - Manqiu Cao
- Veracyte, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA
| | | | - Lori Lofaro
- Veracyte, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA
| | - P Sean Walsh
- Veracyte, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA
| | | | - Jing Huang
- Veracyte, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Alam A, Ansari MA, Badrealam KF, Pathak S. Molecular approaches to lung cancer prevention. Future Oncol 2021; 17:1793-1810. [PMID: 33653087 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2020-0789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Lung cancer is generally diagnosed at advanced stages when surgical resection is not possible. Late diagnosis, along with development of chemoresistance, results in high mortality. Preventive approaches, including smoking cessation, chemoprevention and early detection are needed to improve survival. Smoking cessation combined with low-dose computed tomography screening has modestly improved survival. Chemoprevention has also shown some promise. Despite these successes, most lung cancer cases remain undetected until advanced stages. Additional early detection strategies may further improve survival and treatment outcome. Molecular alterations taking place during lung carcinogenesis have the potential to be used in early detection via noninvasive methods and may also serve as biomarkers for success of chemopreventive approaches. This review focuses on the utilization of molecular biomarkers to increase the efficacy of various preventive approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asrar Alam
- Department of Preventive Oncology, Dr BR Ambedkar Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110029, India
| | - Mohammad A Ansari
- Department of Epidemic Disease Research, Institute of Research & Medical Consultation, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, 31441, Saudi Arabia
| | - Khan F Badrealam
- Cardiovascular & Mitochondrial Related Disease Research Center, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Hualien 970, Taiwan
| | - Sujata Pathak
- Department of Preventive Oncology, Dr BR Ambedkar Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110029, India
| |
Collapse
|