Albuterol-Budesonide Pressurized Metered Dose Inhaler in Patients With Mild-to-Moderate Asthma: Results of the DENALI Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

The Use of Albuterol/Budesonide as Reliever Therapy to Reduce Asthma Exacerbations

Prevention of asthma exacerbations and reduction of systemic corticosteroid burden remain unmet needs in asthma. US asthma guidelines recommend concomitant short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) and inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) as an alternative reliever at step 2. The Food and Drug Administration approved a pressurized metered-dose inhaler containing albuterol and budesonide for as-needed treatment or prevention of bronchoconstriction and for reducing exacerbation risk in patients with asthma aged ≥18 years. This combination is approved for use as a reliever with or without maintenance therapy, but it is not indicated for maintenance therapy (or for single maintenance and reliever therapy). Intervening with as-needed SABA-ICS during the window of opportunity to reduce inflammation during loss of asthma control can reduce exacerbation risk, by exerting both genomic and nongenomic anti-inflammatory effects. We propose that the use of albuterol-budesonide rather than albuterol as a reliever to manage episodic symptoms driven by acute bronchoconstriction and airway inflammation can improve outcomes. This combination approach, shown to decrease asthma exacerbations and oral corticosteroid burden in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma, represents a paradigm shift for asthma treatment in the United States. Further safety and efficacy studies should provide evidence that this type of reliever should be standard of care.

Budesonide/Formoterol or Budesonide/Albuterol as Anti-Inflammatory Reliever Therapy for Asthma

Overuse of reliever as short-acting beta-agonist and associated underuse of controller as inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) administered via separate inhalers results in worse asthma outcomes. Such discordance can be obviated by combining both controller and reliever in the same inhaler. So-called anti-inflammatory reliever (AIR) therapy comprises the use of a single inhaler containing an ICS such as budesonide (BUD) in conjunction with a reliever as either albuterol (ALB) or formoterol (FORM), to be used on demand, with variable dosing driven by asthma symptoms in a flexible patient-centered regimen. Global guidelines now support the use of BUD-ALB as AIR therapy to reduce exacerbations, either on its own in mild asthma or in conjunction with fixed-dose maintenance ICS-long-acting beta-agonist in moderate to severe asthma. Using BUD-FORM on its own allows patients to seamlessly move in an intuitive flexible fashion between AIR and maintenance and reliever therapy, by stepping up and down the dosing escalator across a spectrum of asthma severities. Head-to-head clinical studies are indicated to compare BUD-FORM versus BUD-ALB as AIR in mild asthma, and also BUD-FORM as maintenance and reliever therapy versus BUD-ALB as AIR plus maintenance ICS-long-acting beta-agonist in moderate to severe asthma. Patients should be encouraged to make an informed decision in conjunction with their health care professional regarding the best therapeutic option tailored to their individual needs, which in turn is likely to result in long-term compliance and associated optimal asthma control.

The Role of ICS-Containing Rescue Therapy Versus SABA Alone in Asthma Management Today

The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) recommends that short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) monotherapy should no longer be prescribed, and that as-needed combination inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)-formoterol is the preferred reliever therapy in adults and adolescents with mild asthma. These recommendations are based on the risks of SABA monotherapy, the evidence that ICS-formoterol reliever therapy markedly decreases the occurrence of severe asthma exacerbations compared with SABA reliever therapy alone, and because ICS-formoterol reliever therapy has a favorable risk/benefit profile compared with maintenance ICS plus SABA reliever therapy. Data supporting the use of combination ICS-albuterol reliever therapy in mild asthma are more limited, but there are studies that inform its use in this population. In this review, we compare, using a pros and cons format, the (1) long-term safety and efficacy of ICS-formoterol reliever therapy versus SABA reliever therapy alone, (2) long-term safety and efficacy of ICS-albuterol reliever therapy versus SABA reliever therapy alone, (3) immediate bronchodilator effects of ICS-formoterol versus SABA alone, and (4) clinical and regulatory factors that may inform reliever therapy prescription decisions. By presenting the evidence of these reliever inhaler options, we hope to inform the reader while also calling for necessary future effectiveness and implementation research.

Preparation of Budesonide-Loaded Liposomal Nanoparticles for Pulmonary Delivery and Their Therapeutic Effect in OVA-Induced Asthma in Mice

Purpose

Inhaled corticosteroids, including budesonide (BUD), are widely employed for the treatment of asthma. However, the frequent use of corticosteroids is associated with numerous adverse effects and poses challenges to ongoing drug therapy and patient adherence. Budesonide liposomal nanoparticles (BUD-LNPs) were developed to improve the bioavailability of the drug and thereby improve the effectiveness of asthma treatment.

Methods

BUD-LNPs were prepared via thin-film hydration, and the characterizations, stability, and in vitro release of BUD-LNPs were studied. In vitro cellular uptake was observed by laser-scanning confocal microscope (LSCM) and flow cytometry. And the in vitro anti-inflammatory activity of BUD-LNPs was evaluated by measuring the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in activated macrophages. Besides, the accumulation time in the lung of drugs delivered via liposomal carriers and free drugs was compared in vivo. And the in vivo therapeutic efficacy of BUD-LNPs was assessed in OVA-induced asthmatic mice. Finally, in vivo biosafety assessment was performed.

Results

The particle size, PDI, and zeta potential of BUD-LNPs were 127.63±1.33 nm, 0.27±0.02, and 3.33±0.13 mV, respectively. BUD-LNPs exhibited excellent biosafety and anti-inflammatory activity in vitro. Furthermore, compared with the free drugs, the utilization of liposomal nano-vehicles for drugs delivery could effectively extend the duration of drugs accumulation in the pulmonary system. Additionally, treatment with BUD-LNPs alleviated airway hyperresponsiveness, reduced airway mucus secretion, and mitigated pulmonary inflammation in OVA-induced asthmatic mice. And the BUD-LNPs demonstrated superior therapeutic efficacy compared to free BUD.

Conclusion

BUD-LNPs was successfully prepared with excellent stability and sustained release for 24 h in vitro. The data of anti-inflammatory activity, asthma therapeutic effects and safety studies indicated that drug delivery mediated by liposomal nano-vehicles was a feasible and desirable strategy for medical strategy and showed great promise in the clinical therapy of asthma.