Characterization and use of hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography type stationary phases in supercritical fluid chromatography

Selectivity comparison of acetonitrile-methanol-water ternary mobile phases on an octadecylsiloxane-bonded silica stationary phase

The solvation parameter model was used in this study to investigate various intermolecular interactions that influence retention on the standard C18 stationary phase for the solvent system acetonitrile:methanol (ACN:MeOH, 1:1). In comparison to the organic mobile phase modifiers acetonitrile, acetone, methanol, 2-propanol, and tetrahydrofuran, the solvent strength for the ACN:MeOH (1:1) solvent system was evaluated. To facilitate the interpretation of various intermolecular interactions that contribute to retention on a standard C18 stationary phase for the solvent system ACN:MeOH (1:1), system maps were constructed and compared with those of acetone, tetrahydrofuran, acetonitrile, 2-propanol, and methanol. The solvation parameter models were constructed for the ternary solvent system ACN:MeOH (1:1)-water, and in the models constructed, the coefficient of determination values were from 0.998 to 0.999, the Fisher statistic values for the models were from 1687 to 4015, and the standard error of the estimate values ranged from 0.022 to 0.029. The solvent system ACN:MeOH (1:1) has retention properties more similar to methanol than acetonitrile, indicating methanol's influence is more dominant.

An attempt to apply a subtraction model for characterization of non-polar stationary phase in supercritical fluid chromatography

This study verified the feasibility of using a subtraction model to characterize the non-polar stationary phases (including C4, C8, and phenyl-type) in supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC). The model with 6 terms was expressed as log α = η'H + θ'P + β'A + α'B + κ'C + σ'S, where a term θ'P indicating dipole or induced dipole interaction was intentionally supplemented. Ethylbenzene and SunFire C8 were respectively defined as the reference solute and column. A 7-step modeling procedure was proposed: in the first 6 steps, except σ'S, by the use of a bidirectional fitting method, other parameters were calculated based on the equation: log α = log (k_i/k_ref) ≈ η'H + θ'P + β'A + α'B + κ'C; and in the 7th step, residual analysis was employed to describe the σ'S term according to the equation: σ'S = log α_exp. - log α_pre. Furthermore, six columns that were not involved in modeling process and 12 compounds with unknown retention were used for methodology validation. It showed good predictions of log k, as demonstrated by adjusted determination coefficient (R²_adj) from 0.9927 to 0.9998 (column) and from 0.9940 to 0.9999 (compound), respectively. The subtraction model emphasized the contribution of dipole or induced dipole interaction to the retention in SFC, and it obtained the σ'S term through residual analysis. Moreover, it made reasonable physical-chemical sense as the linear solvation energy relationship (LSER) model did, with the distinct advantages of better fitting and more accurate prediction. This study provided some new insights into the characterization of non-polar stationary phases in SFC.

Unique selectivity of tetrahydrofuran-2-propanol-water ternary mobile phases on a superficially porous particle column in reversed-phase liquid chromatography

Three mixed mobile phase organic modifiers, tetrahydrofuran: 2-propanol 1:1 (v/v), tetrahydrofuran: 2-propanol: 1:3 (v/v), and tetrahydrofuran: 2-propanol: 3:1 (v/v) were studied at 20-70% (v/v) total organic solvent compositions. The solvent strength parameters for the three mixed organic modifiers and system properties were compared to those of more established binary solvent systems, acetonitrile-water and methanol-water. To interpret intermolecular interactions responsible for retention for the three mixed mobile phase organic modifiers, system maps were constructed and compared with acetonitrile and methanol. Three mixed organic mobile phase modifiers on one stationary phase chemistry (Kinetex C18) provide different selectivity than the more established acetonitrile and methanol mobile phase modifiers on the same stationary phase (Kinetex C18) as well as different stationary phase chemistries (Kinetex Biphenyl, Kinetex Phenyl-Hexyl, Kinetex F5, Kinetex XB-C18, and Kinetex EVO C18). The solvation parameter models for all three mixed mobile phase systems the coefficient of determination ranged from 0.991 to 0.999, the Fisher statistic from 338 to 1850, and the standard error of the estimate ranged from 0.024 to 0.097.

A story of peptides, lipophilicity and chromatography - back and forth in time

Peptides, as part of the beyond the rule of 5 (bRo5) chemical space, represent a unique class of pharmaceutical compounds. Because of their exceptional position in the chemical space between traditional small molecules (molecular weight (MW) < 500 Da) and large therapeutic proteins (MW > 5000 Da), peptides became promising candidates for targeting challenging binding sites, including even targets traditionally considered as undruggable - e.g. intracellular protein-protein interactions. However, basic knowledge about physicochemical properties that are important for a drug to be membrane permeable is missing but would enhance the drug discovery process of bRo5 molecules. Consequently, there is a demand for quick and simple lipophilicity determination methods for peptides. In comparison to the traditional lipophilicity determination methods via shake flask and in silico prediction, chromatography-based methods could have multiple benefits such as the requirement of low analyte amount, insensitivity to impurities and high throughput. Herein we elucidate the role of peptide lipophilicity and different lipophilicity values. Further, we summarize peptide analysis via common chromatographic techniques, in specific reversed phase liquid chromatography, hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography and supercritical fluid chromatography and their role in drug discovery and development process.

Supercritical fluid extraction-supercritical fluid chromatography of saliva: Single-quadrupole mass spectrometry monitoring of caffeine for gastric emptying studies†

Saliva is an attractive sampling matrix for measuring various endogenous and exogeneous substances but requires sample treatment prior to chromatographic analysis. Exploiting supercritical CO₂ for both extraction and chromatography simplifies sample preparation, reduces organic solvent consumption, and minimizes exposure to potentially infectious samples, but has not yet been applied to oral fluid. Here, we demonstrate the feasibility and benefits of online supercritical fluid extraction coupled to supercritical fluid chromatography and single-quadrupole mass spectrometry for monitoring the model salivary tracer caffeine. A comparison of ¹³ C- and ³² S-labeled internal standards with external standard calibration confirmed the superiority of stable isotope-labeled caffeine over nonanalogous internal standards. As proof of concept, the validated method was applied to saliva from a magnetic resonance imaging study of gastric emptying. After administration of 35 mg caffeine via ice capsule, salivary levels correlated with magnetic resonance imaging data, corroborating caffeine's usefulness as tracer of gastric emptying (R²  = 0.945). In contrast to off-line methods, online quantification required only minute amounts of organic solvents and a single manual operation prior to online bioanalysis of saliva, thus demonstrating the usefulness of CO₂ -based extraction and separation techniques for potentially infective biomatrices.

Comparison of the steric selectivity on hydrophilic interaction chromatography columns modified with poly(acrylamide) possessing different morphology

Poly(acrylamide) (PAAm)-modified hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) columns were prepared via surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization (SI-ATRP) and free radical polymerization (FRP) to generate brush-like and mushroom-like polymer chains on silica particles, respectively. The maltose homologues (MHs) and cyclodextrins (CDs) were chosen as analytes to evaluate steric selectivity by the different polymer morphologies in the ATRP-PAAm and the FRP-PAAm columns. The ATRP-PAAm exhibited superior retention than the FRP-PAAm and three commercial HILIC columns. The house-made PAAm columns provided significant hydrophilicity that enabled to analysis the oligosaccharides even in 60:40 mixture of acetonitrile-aqueous buffer. In the case of three ATRP-PAAm columns characterized by different polymer lengths and the density on the silica particles, those are different thickness of the water-enriched layer, and phase ratio φ, based on hydrophilicity of them columns. The logarithm of the retention factor (ln k) displayed a non-linear dependence on the inverse of the temperature (1/T, T = 278-333 K). Notably, a similar correlation was observed to exist between the logarithm of the phase ratio (ln φ), and 1/T. A van't Hoff plot was used to determine the thermodynamic parameters of the partition process for each MH. The values of the Gibbs free energy (ΔG°) for the analytes partition on the ATRP-PAAm columns were smaller than their counterparts measured for the FRP-PAAm columns; by contrast, the opposite trend was observed for the ΔG° values measured for CDs. The standard entropy ΔS° for MHs and CDs were comparable for the two types PAAm columns, while, the standard enthalpy, ΔH° displays significant difference between the ATRP and the FRP PAAm columns. These findings indicate that the differences between PAAm morphology and polymer densities on the stationary phase surface affect analyte differentiation on the basis of molecular steric factors. The higher selectivity for MHs and CDs displayed by ATRP-PAAm columns with respect to their FRP-PAAm and commercial amide columns will be useful for the fine separation of oligosaccharides.

A review of retention mechanism studies for packed column supercritical fluid chromatography

The packed column supercritical fluid chromatography has risen as a promising alternative separation technique to the conventional liquid chromatography and gas chromatography. Although the packed column supercritical fluid chromatography has many advantages compared to other chromatographic techniques, its separation mechanism is not fully understood due to the complex combination effects of many chromatographic parameters on separation quality and the lacking of global strategies for studying separation mechanisms. This review aims to provide recent information regarding the chromatographic behaviors and the effects of the parameters on the separation, discuss the results, and point out the remaining bottlenecks in the packed column supercritical fluid chromatography retention mechanism studies.

Characterization of stationary phases in supercritical fluid chromatography including exploration of shape selectivity

Achiral packed column supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) has shown an important regain of interest in academic and industrial laboratories in the recent years. In relation to this increased concern, major instrument manufacturers have designed some stationary phases specifically for SFC use. SFC stationary phases have been widely examined over the last two decades, based on the use of linear solvation energy relationships (LSER), which relate analyte retention to its properties and to the interaction capabilities of the chromatographic system. The method provides some understanding on retention mechanisms (normal phase, reversed phase or mixed-mode) and the possibility to compare stationary phases on a rational basis, especially through a spider diagram providing a visual classification. The latter can be used as a primary tool to select complementary stationary phases to be screened for any separation at early stages of method development, before optimization steps. In this context, the characterization of the 14 columns from the Shim-pack UC series (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan), which are dedicated to SFC and more broadly to unified chromatography (UC), was performed, using the LSER methodology. As in previous works, seven descriptors, including five Abraham descriptors (E, S, A, B, V) and two descriptors describing positive and negative charges (D^- and D⁺) were first employed to describe interactions with neutral and charged analytes. Secondly, two more descriptors were introduced, which were previously employed solely for the characterization of enantioselective systems and expressing shape features of the analytes (flexibility F and globularity G). They brought additional insight into the retention mechanisms, showing how spatial insertion of the analytes in some stationary phases is contributing to shape separation capabilities and how folding possibilities in flexible molecules is unfavorable to retention in other stationary phases.

Supercritical fluid chromatography - Mass spectrometry in metabolomics: Past, present, and future perspectives

Metabolomics, which consists of the comprehensive analysis of metabolites within a biological system, has been playing a growing role in the implementation of personalized medicine in modern healthcare. A wide range of analytical approaches are used in metabolomics, notably mass spectrometry (MS) combined to liquid chromatography (LC), gas chromatography (GC), or capillary electrophoresis (CE). However, none of these methods enable a comprehensive analysis of the metabolome, due to its extreme complexity and the large differences in physico-chemical properties between metabolite classes. In this context, supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) represents a promising alternative approach to improve the metabolome coverage, while further increasing the analysis throughput. SFC, which uses supercritical CO₂ as mobile phase, leads to numerous advantages such as improved kinetic performance and lower environmental impact. This chromatographic technique has gained a significant interest since the introduction of advanced instrumentation, together with the introduction of dedicated interfaces for hyphenating SFC to MS. Moreover, new developments in SFC column chemistry (including sub-2 µm particles), as well as the use of large amounts of organic modifiers and additives in the CO₂-based mobile phase, significantly extended the application range of SFC, enabling the simultaneous analysis of a large diversity of metabolites. Over the last years, several applications have been reported in metabolomics using SFC-MS - from lipophilic compounds, such as steroids and other lipids, to highly polar compounds, such as carbohydrates, amino acids, or nucleosides. With all these advantages, SFC-MS is promised to a bright future in the field of metabolomics.

Chromatographic analysis of biomolecules with pressurized carbon dioxide mobile phases - A review

Biomolecules like proteins, peptides and nucleic acids widely emerge in pharmaceutical applications, either as synthetic active pharmaceutical ingredients, or from natural products as in traditional Chinese medicine. Liquid-phase chromatographic methods (LC) are widely employed for the analysis and/or purification of such molecules. On another hand, to answer the ever-increasing requests from scientists involved in biomolecules projects, other chromatographic methods emerge as useful complements to LC. In particular, there is a growing interest for chromatography with a mobile phase comprising pressurized carbon dioxide, which can be named either (i) supercritical (or subcritical) fluid chromatography (SFC) when CO₂ is the major constituent of the mobile phase, or (ii) enhanced fluidity liquid chromatography (EFLC) when hydro-organic or purely organic solvents are the major constituents of the mobile phase. Despite the low polarity of CO₂, supposedly inadequate to solubilize such biomolecules, SFC and EFLC were both employed in many occasions for this purpose. This paper specifically reviews the literature related to the SFC/EFLC analysis of free amino acids, peptides, proteins, nucleobases, nucleosides and nucleotides. The analytical conditions employed for specific molecular families are presented, with a focus on the nature of the stationary phase and the mobile phase composition. We also discuss the potential benefits of combining SFC/EFLC to LC in a single gradient elution, a method sometimes designated as unified chromatography (UC). Finally, detection issues are presented, and more particularly hyphenation to mass spectrometry.

Supercritical fluid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry for lipidomics

Supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) has experienced a particular revival in recent years thanks to the development of robust and efficient commercial systems. Because of its physico-chemical properties, supercritical carbon dioxide (CO₂ ) mixed with cosolvents and additives is particularly suitable for SFC to allow the elution of compounds of different polarities and more particularly complex lipids. Hyphenation with mass spectrometry (MS) is increasingly described in the literature but still requires many further developments in order to be as user-friendly as coupling with liquid chromatography. The basic concepts of SFC and MS hyphenation will be first considered. Then a representative example of method development in lipidomics will be introduced. In conclusion, the challenges and future needs in this field of research will be discussed.

Comparison of Retention Behavior between Supercritical Fluid Chromatography and Normal-Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography with Various Stationary Phases

The retention behavior of a wide variety of stationary phases was compared in supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) and normal-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (NP-HPLC). We also attempted to elucidate the retention behavior in SFC by investigating the selectivity of the different stationary phases. SFC separation conditions with polar stationary phases, such as silica gel (SL) and diol (Diol) phases, operate via adsorptions that include hydrophilic and ionic interactions similar to those in NP-HPLC. Moreover, non-polar stationary phases, such as pentabromophenyl (PBr), pyrenylethyl (PYE), and octadecyl (C₁₈), could be used despite the non-polar mobile phase conditions, because the dispersion and π-π interactions were stronger in SFC than in HPLC. These results reflect the selectivity of the stationary phase and its retention factor, thus providing useful information for the selection of appropriate stationary phases for particular analytes.

Enhanced fluidity liquid chromatography: A guide to scaling up from analytical to preparative separations

The evolution of supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) instrumentation, improved detection capability, and expanded modifier range has led to extending the reach of SFC to the analysis of a broader spectrum of analytes beyond enantioselective separations. However, preparative SFC has yet to see the same technological revitalization, especially in regards to the purification of highly polar analytes. Enhanced fluidity liquid chromatography (EFLC) has been demonstrated as one of the ways to extend the applicable range of SFC instrumentation to highly polar analytes such as proteins, carbohydrates, and nucleotides. Despite recent applications of EFLC for challenging mixtures of hydrophilic metabolites and analogs, its viability in preparative purification, which is of great importance to the pharmaceutical industry, remains unknown. Herein, multiple chromatographic parameters that are critical to achieve feasible EFLC purification methods were investigated, including system pressure as a function of modifier composition (for several MeOH:H₂O ratios), effect of diluent injection conditions on peak shape, and optimization of mass load with diluent composition. The usage of 50% acetonitrile or methanol diluents provided the most volumetric loading capacity. In the case of sucrose, leveraging higher analyte solubility in water proved to be more favorable than the volumetric loading capacity of diluents with higher organic content. In fact, an 80 mg injection of sucrose was possible on a 2 cm preparative HILIC column with minimal peak shape degradation. The combined information led to the successful demonstration of EFLC for the preparative separation of sugars using readily available MS-directed SFC instrumentation.

Modern Assay Techniques for Cancer Drugs: Electroanalytical and Liquid Chromatography Methods

In the past decades, patients who have chemotherapy treatment have considerably increased number. At this point, the development of rapid precise, and reliable methods are very important to analyze cancer drugs from their dosage forms, animals or human biological samples. Among all the analytical methods, electrochemical methods hold an important position with their unique properties such as specificity in the biological recognition process, fast response, and their reliability and do not need a pretreatment process. Chromatographic methods are also used in a wide range of analytical applications for the analyses of anticancer drugs. The power of chromatography comes from its ability to separate a mixture of analytes and determination of their concentrations. Chromatographic techniques can mainly be divided into gas, liquid, and supercritical fluid chromatography. In the frame of this information, this review is aimed to provide basic principles of electroanalytical and high-performance liquid chromatography methods for the analysis of cancer drugs. In addition, some selected applications for electrochemistry-related techniques and high-performance liquid chromatography, for the determination of anti-cancer pharmaceuticals published in the last five years are also discussed.

Evaluation of an amide-based stationary phase for supercritical fluid chromatography

A relatively new stationary phase containing a polar group embedded in a hydrophobic backbone (i.e., ACE®C18-amide) was evaluated for use in supercritical fluid chromatography. The amide-based column was compared with columns packed with bare silica, C18 silica, and a terminal-amide silica phase. The system was held at supercritical pressure and temperature with a mobile phase composition of CO2 and methanol as cosolvent. The linear solvation energy relationship model was used to evaluate the behavior of these stationary phases, relating the retention factor of selected probes to specific chromatographic interactions. A five-component test mixture, consisting of a group of drug-like molecules was separated isocratically. The results show that the C18 -amide stationary phase provided a combination of interactions contributing to the retention of the probe compounds. The hydrophobic interactions are favorable; however, the electron donating ability of the embedded amide group shows a large positive interaction. Under the chromatographic conditions used, the C18 -amide column was able to provide baseline resolution of all the drug-like probe compounds in a text mixture, while the other columns tested did not.