Non-targeted analysis of the particulate phase of heated tobacco product aerosol and cigarette mainstream tobacco smoke by thermal desorption comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with dual flame ionisation and mass spectrometric detection

A feasibility study of sample re-collection in the analysis of selected volatile compounds in breath samples using GC×GC-TOFMS

In this study, we aimed to assess the feasibility of re-collecting breath samples using the Centri® (Markes International, Bridgend, UK) followed by two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled with time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC×GC-TOFMS) analysis. The work was conducted in two main phases. In the first phase, we evaluated the re-collection performance by analyzing two sets of standards, including a Grob mix primary solution and a standard mixture of 20 selected volatile compounds (VCs) covering different classes of organic species commonly found in breath samples. The intra-day and inter-day precision (reported as relative standard deviation (RSD),%) for the re-collection of the Grob mix primary solution were in the range of 1 % to14 % and 3 % to12 %, respectively. The re-collection accuracy ranged from 78 % to 97 %. The intra-day RSD for the re-collection of the standard mixture of selected VCs was within 20 % for all compounds, except for acetone and nonane. The precision was within 25 % for all compounds, except for nonane, n-hexane, 1,4-dichlorobenzene, and decane, which exhibited less than 36 % RSD. The re-collection accuracy was in the range of 67 % to 129 %. In the second phase of the study, the re-collection performance in breath analysis was evaluated via five repetitive splitting and re-collection of six breath samples obtained from healthy adults, realizing a total of 30 breath analyses. Initially, we evaluated the re-collection performance by considering all features obtained from breath analysis and then focused on the 20 VCs commonly found in breath samples. The re-collection accuracy for total breath features ranged from 86 to 103 %, and the RSDs were in the range of 1.0 % to 10.4 %. For the selected VCs, the re-collection accuracy of all compounds, except for undecane and benzene, was in the range of 71 % to 132 %.

Assessment of toxicological validity using tobacco emission condensates: A comparative analysis of emissions and condensates from 3R4F reference cigarettes and heated tobacco products

The tobacco emission condensate, henceforth referred to as "tobacco condensate," plays a critical role in assessing the toxicity of tobacco products. This condensate, derived from tobacco emissions, provides an optimized liquid concentrate for storage and concentration control. Thus, the validation of its constituents is vital for toxicity assessments. This study used tobacco condensates from 3R4F cigarettes and three heated tobacco product (HTP) variants to quantify and contrast organic compounds (OCs) therein. The hazard index (HI) for tobacco emissions and condensates was determined to ascertain the assessment validity. The total particulate matter (TPM) for 3R4F registered at 17,667 μg cig-1, with its total OC (TOC) at 3777 μg cig-1. HTPs' TPM and TOC were 9342 ± 1918 μg cig-1 and 5258 ± 593 μg stick-1, respectively. 3R4F's heightened TPM likely arises from tar, while HTPs' OC concentrations are influenced by vegetable glycerin (2236-2688 μg stick-1) and propylene glycol (589-610 μg stick-1). During the condensation process, a substantial proportion of OCs in 3R4F smoke underwent significant concentration decreases, in contrast to HTPs, where fewer than half of the examined OCs exhibited notable concentration declines. The HI for tobacco emissions exhibited a marginally higher value compared to tobacco condensate, with variations ranging from 7.92% (HTPs) to 18.6% (3R4F), denoting a minimal differential. These observations emphasize the importance of accurate OC recovery techniques to maintain the validity and reliability of toxicity assessments based on tobacco condensates. This study not only deepens the comprehension of chemical behaviors in tobacco products but also establishes a novel benchmark for their toxicity evaluation, with profound implications for public health strategies and consumer protection.

Non-targeted analytical comparison of a heated tobacco product aerosol against mainstream cigarette smoke: does heating tobacco produce an inherently different set of aerosol constituents?

Smoking-related diseases remain a significant public health concern, and heated tobacco products (HTPs) have emerged as a potential alternative to cigarettes. While several studies have confirmed that HTP aerosols contain lower levels of harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHCs) than cigarette smoke, less is known about constituents that are intrinsically higher in HTP aerosols. This study provides a comprehensive comparative assessment of an HTP aerosol produced with Tobacco Heating System 2.2 (THS) and comparator cigarette (CC) smoke aiming at identifying all unique or increased compounds in THS aerosol by applying a broad set of LC-MS and GC × GC-MS methods. To focus on differences due to heating versus burning tobacco, confounding factors were minimized by using the same tobacco in both test items and not adding flavorants. Of all analytical features, only 3.5%-corresponding to 31 distinctive compounds-were significantly more abundant in THS aerosol than in CC smoke. A notable subset of these compounds was identified as reaction products of glycerol. The only compound unique to THS aerosol was traced back to its presence in a non-tobacco material in the test item and not a direct product of heating tobacco. Our results demonstrate that heating a glycerol-containing tobacco substrate to the temperatures applied in THS does not introduce new compounds in the resulting aerosol compared to CC smoke which are detectable with the method portfolio applied in this study. Overall, this study contributes to a better understanding of the chemical composition of HTP aerosols and their potential impact on human health.

Novel chemical contaminants associated with thirdhand smoke in settled house dust

Thirdhand smoke (THS) is the persistent and toxic residue from tobacco smoke in indoor environments. A comprehensive understanding of the chemical constituents of THS is necessary to assess the risks of long-term exposure and to establish reliable THS tracers. The objective of this study was to investigate compounds associated with THS through nontargeted analysis (NTA) of settled house dust samples from smokers' and non-smokers' homes, using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled to time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC×GC/TOF-MS). Compounds that were either only present in dust from smokers' homes or that had significantly larger abundance than in non-smokers' homes were termed qualified compounds. We identified 140 qualified compounds, and of these, 42 compounds were tentatively identified by searching matching mass spectra in NIST electron impact (EI) mass spectral library including 20 compounds confirmed with their authentic standards. Among the 42 compounds, 26 compounds were statistically more abundant (p < 0.10) in dust from homes of smokers; seven were tobacco-specific compounds, two of which (nornicotyrine, 3-ethenylpyridine) have not been reported before in house dust. Two compounds, tris (2-chloroethyl) phosphate (a toxic compound used as a flame retardant and reported in tobacco) and propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, 1-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-2-methyl-1,3-propanediyl ester (highly abundant and reported in exhaled air of smokers), were found in dust from all smokers' homes and in zero non-smokers' homes, making these potential THS tracers, possibly associated with recent smoking. Benzyl methyl ketone was significantly higher in dust in smokers' homes, and was previously reported not as a product of tobacco but rather as a form of methamphetamine. This compound was recently reported in mainstream tobacco smoke condensate through NTA as well. These identified potential tracers and chemical components of THS in this study can be further investigated for use in developing THS contamination and exposure assessments.

Nontargeted Analysis in Tobacco Research: Challenges and Opportunities

Tobacco products are evolving at a pace that has outstripped tobacco control, leading to a high prevalence of tobacco use in the population. Researchers have been tirelessly developing suitable techniques to assess these products' emissions, toxicity, and public health impact. The nonclinical testing of tobacco products to assess the chemical profile of emissions is needed for evidence-based regulations. This testing has largely relied on targeted analytical methods that focus on constituent lists that may fall short in determining the toxicity of newly designed tobacco products. Nontargeted analysis (NTA), or the process of identifying and quantifying compounds within a complex matrix without prior knowledge of its chemical composition, is a promising technique for tobacco regulation, but it is not without challenges. The lack of standardized methods for sample generation, sample preparation, chromatographic separation, compound identification, and data analysis and reporting must be addressed so that the quality and reproducibility of the data generated by NTA can be benchmarked. This review discusses the challenges and highlights the opportunities of NTA in studying tobacco product constituents and emissions.

Preliminary toxicological assessment of heated tobacco products: A review of the literature and proposed strategy

Heated tobacco products (HTP) have become increasingly common in many countries worldwide. The principle of heating tobacco, without combustion, to produce a nicotine-containing aerosol with remarkably reduced levels of other known toxins, compared to combusted tobacco cigarettes, is now well established. As these products are intended as alternatives to traditional combusted products, during the early stages of their development, it is important for manufacturers to ensure that the design of the product does not lead to any unintentionally increased or new risk for the consumer, compared to the traditional products that consumers seek to replace. There is limited guidance from tobacco product regulations concerning the requirements for performing such preliminary toxicological assessments. Here, we review the published literature on studies performed on HTPs in the pursuit of such data, outline a proposed approach that is consistent with regulatory requirements, and provide a logical approach to the preliminary toxicological assessment of HTPs.

Non-Targeted Analysis Using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry for Evaluation of Chemical Composition of E-Vapor Products

The Premarket Tobacco Product Applications (PMTA) guidance issued by the Food and Drug Administration for electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDSs) recommends that in addition to reporting harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHCs), manufacturers should evaluate these products for other chemicals that could form during use and over time. Although e-vapor product aerosols are considerably less complex than mainstream smoke from cigarettes and heated tobacco product (HTP) aerosols, there are challenges with performing a comprehensive chemical characterization. Some of these challenges include the complexity of the e-liquid chemical compositions, the variety of flavors used, and the aerosol collection efficiency of volatile and semi-volatile compounds generated from aerosols. In this study, a non-targeted analysis method was developed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) that allows evaluation of volatile and semi-volatile compounds in e-liquids and aerosols of e-vapor products. The method employed an automated data analysis workflow using Agilent MassHunter Unknowns Analysis software for mass spectral deconvolution, peak detection, and library searching and reporting. The automated process ensured data integrity and consistency of compound identification with >99% of known compounds being identified using an in-house custom mass spectral library. The custom library was created to aid in compound identifications and includes over 1,100 unique mass spectral entries, of which 600 have been confirmed from reference standard comparisons. The method validation included accuracy, precision, repeatability, limit of detection (LOD), and selectivity. The validation also demonstrated that this semi-quantitative method provides estimated concentrations with an accuracy ranging between 0.5- and 2.0-fold as compared to the actual values. The LOD threshold of 0.7 ppm was established based on instrument sensitivity and accuracy of the compounds identified. To demonstrate the application of this method, we share results from the comprehensive chemical profile of e-liquids and aerosols collected from a marketed e-vapor product. Applying the data processing workflow developed here, 46 compounds were detected in the e-liquid formulation and 55 compounds in the aerosol sample. More than 50% of compounds reported have been confirmed with reference standards. The profiling approach described in this publication is applicable to evaluating volatile and semi-volatile compounds in e-vapor products.

Review of data on chemical content in an aerosol resulting from heating a tobacco or a solution used in e-cigarettes and in the smoke generated from the reference cigarettes

BACKGROUND

The article presents a review of the literature on the chemical composition of smoke generated from a standard cigarette and the aerosol generated after heating tobacco and chemical compounds formed in the aerosol of electronic cigarettes.

METHODS

The literature review was carried out on the PubMed online bibliographic database, Google search engine, Google Scholar based on science articles published in recent 20 years.

RESULTS

The bibliographic analysis shows that: replacing smoking in the traditional way by heating tobacco modifies significantly the content of chemical substances found in aerosol, the substances found in aerosols generated by e-cigarettes have proven toxic effects, e.g. pro-inflammatory effect on lung epithelial cells (e.g. crotonaldehyde) or a mutagenic effect (e.g. NNK), using e-cigarette aerosol does not rule out a health risk for people, which is not fully recognized at present.

CONCLUSIONS

Replacing smoking in the traditional way by heating tobacco modifies significantly the content of chemical substances found in aerosol. Using e-cigarette aerosol does not rule out a health risk for people, because the substances found in aerosols generated by e-cigarettes have proven toxic effects.