1
|
Galli M, Vescovo GM, Andreotti F, D'Amario D, Leone AM, Benenati S, Vergallo R, Niccoli G, Trani C, Porto I. Impact of coronary stenting on top of medical therapy and of inclusion of periprocedural infarctions on hard composite endpoints in patients with chronic coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Minerva Cardiol Angiol 2023; 71:221-229. [PMID: 33944534 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-5683.21.05645-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Composite endpoints are pivotal when assessing rare outcomes over relatively short follow-ups. Most randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation to optimal medical therapy (OMT) in chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) patients included both hard and soft outcomes in their primary endpoint, with periprocedural myocardial infarctions (MIs) systematically allocated to the PCI arm. We meta-analyzed the above RCTs for composite hard endpoints, with and without periprocedural MIs. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION This study is registered in PROSPERO CRD42020166754 and follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Cochrane Collaboration reporting. Patients had inducible ischemia, no left main disease nor severe left ventricular dysfunction. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Six RCTs involving 10,751 patients followed for a mean of 4.4 years were included. PCI+OMT versus OMT alone was associated with no difference in the two co-primary composite endpoints of all-cause death/MI/stroke and cardiovascular death/MI including all-MIs (IRR 0.99; 95% CI 0.90-1.08 and IRR 0.95; 95% CI 0.83-1.08 respectively). After inclusion of spontaneous rather than all-MIs (i.e., excluding periprocedural MIs), the odds showed benefit of PCI+OMT for both co-primary endpoints (IRR 0.88; 95% CI 0.80-0.97, P<0.01 and IRR 0.81; 95% CI 0.69-0.95, P=0.01 respectively) with numbers needed to treat of 42 in both cases. CONCLUSIONS Among CCS patients with inducible myocardial ischemia without severely reduced ejection fraction or left main disease, adding PCI to OMT reduces hard composite outcomes only after exclusion of periprocedural MIs. Continued efforts to define periprocedural MIs reproducibly, to assess their prognostic relevance and to prevent them are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mattia Galli
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, IRCCS A. Gemelli University Polyclinic Foundation, Rome, Italy
- Sacred Heart Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni M Vescovo
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Felicita Andreotti
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, IRCCS A. Gemelli University Polyclinic Foundation, Rome, Italy
- Sacred Heart Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Domenico D'Amario
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, IRCCS A. Gemelli University Polyclinic Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Stefano Benenati
- IRCCS San Martino University Hospital, Italian Cardiovascular Network, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Rocco Vergallo
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, IRCCS A. Gemelli University Polyclinic Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Niccoli
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, IRCCS A. Gemelli University Polyclinic Foundation, Rome, Italy
- Sacred Heart Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Trani
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, IRCCS A. Gemelli University Polyclinic Foundation, Rome, Italy
- Sacred Heart Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Italo Porto
- IRCCS San Martino University Hospital, Italian Cardiovascular Network, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy -
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shah R, Nayyar M, Le FK, Labroo A, Nasr A, Rashid A, Davis DA, Weintraub WS, Boden WE. A meta-analysis of optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Coron Artery Dis 2022; 33:91-97. [PMID: 33878073 DOI: 10.1097/mca.0000000000001041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves clinical outcomes in patients with chronic angina and stable coronary artery disease (CAD) has been a continuing area of investigation for more than two decades. The recently reported results of the International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches, the largest prospective trial of optimal medical therapy (OMT) with or without myocardial revascularization, provides a unique opportunity to determine whether there is an incremental benefit of revascularization in stable CAD patients. METHODS Scientific databases and websites were searched to find randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Pooled risk ratios were calculated using the random-effects model. RESULTS Data from 10 RCTs comprising 12 125 patients showed that PCI, when added to OMT, were not associated with lower all-cause mortality (risk ratios, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.87-1.08), cardiovascular mortality (risk ratios, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.79-1.05) or myocardial infarction (MI) (risk ratios, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.78-1.04) as compared with OMT alone. However, OMT+PCI was associated with improved anginal symptoms and a lower risk for revascularization (risk ratios, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.37-0.75). CONCLUSIONS In patient with chronic stable CAD (without left main disease or reduced ejection fraction), PCI in addition to OMT did not improve mortality or MI compared to OMT alone. However, this strategy is associated with a lower rate of revascularization and improved anginal symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahman Shah
- Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee, Memphis, Tennessee
- Department of Cardiology, Gulf Coast Medical center, Alabama University of Osteopathic Medicine, Panama City, Florida
| | - Mannu Nayyar
- Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Francis K Le
- Department of Cardiology, Gulf Coast Medical center, Alabama University of Osteopathic Medicine, Panama City, Florida
| | - Ajay Labroo
- Department of Cardiology, Gulf Coast Medical center, Alabama University of Osteopathic Medicine, Panama City, Florida
| | - Abrar Nasr
- Department of Biology, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Abdul Rashid
- Department of Cardiology, University of Tennessee, Jackson, Tennessee
| | - Donnie A Davis
- Department of Cardiology, Gulf Coast Medical center, Alabama University of Osteopathic Medicine, Panama City, Florida
| | | | - William E Boden
- Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs (VA) New England Healthcare System, Boston University
- Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hochstadt A, Itach T, Merdler I, Ghantous E, Ziv-Baran T, Leshno M, Banai S, Konigstein M. The Effectiveness of CS Reducer for the treatment of Refractory Angina - a Meta-Analysis. Can J Cardiol 2021; 38:376-383. [PMID: 34968714 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2021.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Revised: 11/25/2021] [Accepted: 12/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Refractory angina is a debilitating condition that affects quality of life of patients worldwide, that after exhausting standard available therapies are regarded as "no option" patients. Recently, coronary sinus (CS) Reducer implantation became available and is gaining popularity in the treatment of refractory angina. The effectiveness of this therapy was demonstrated in one randomized sham-control trial and numerous uncontrolled prospective studies entailing altogether several hundred patients. We performed a meta-analysis to incorporate the data and elucidate its efficacy and safety. METHODS A meta-analysis of prospective studies assessing the effects of CS narrowing published in English until June 2021 was performed. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients improving ≥1 class in the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CSS) angina score. Other endpoints included proportion of patients improving ≥2 CCS classes, procedural success, periprocedural complications, changes in Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) scores, and six-minute walk test (6MWT). RESULTS Data from 9 studies, including 846 patients was included. An improvement of ≥1 CSS class occurred in 76% [95% CI 73%- 80%] of patients. Improvement of ≥2 CSS classes was observed in 40% of patients (95% CI of 35-46%). Procedure success was 98%, with no major and 3% of non-major periprocedural complications. Post procedural SAQ scores and 6MWT distance were significantly improved. CONCLUSIONS In patients suffering from angina refractory to medical and interventional therapies, CS narrowing implantation improves symptoms and quality of life, with a low complication rate. These results are consistent in one randomized trial and in multiple prospective, uncontrolled studies.
Collapse
|
4
|
Duarte A, Llewellyn A, Walker R, Schmitt L, Wright K, Walker S, Rothery C, Simmonds M. Non-invasive imaging software to assess the functional significance of coronary stenoses: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2021; 25:1-230. [PMID: 34588097 DOI: 10.3310/hta25560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND QAngio® XA 3D/QFR® (three-dimensional/quantitative flow ratio) imaging software (Medis Medical Imaging Systems BV, Leiden, the Netherlands) and CAAS® vFFR® (vessel fractional flow reserve) imaging software (Pie Medical Imaging BV, Maastricht, the Netherlands) are non-invasive technologies to assess the functional significance of coronary stenoses, which can be alternatives to invasive fractional flow reserve assessment. OBJECTIVES The objectives were to determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of QAngio XA 3D/QFR and CAAS vFFR. METHODS We performed a systematic review of all evidence on QAngio XA 3D/QFR and CAAS vFFR, including diagnostic accuracy, clinical effectiveness, implementation and economic analyses. We searched MEDLINE and other databases to January 2020 for studies where either technology was used and compared with fractional flow reserve in patients with intermediate stenosis. The risk of bias was assessed with quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy were performed. Clinical and implementation outcomes were synthesised narratively. A simulation study investigated the clinical impact of using QAngio XA 3D/QFR. We developed a de novo decision-analytic model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of QAngio XA 3D/QFR and CAAS vFFR relative to invasive fractional flow reserve or invasive coronary angiography alone. Scenario analyses were undertaken to explore the robustness of the results to variation in the sources of data used to populate the model and alternative assumptions. RESULTS Thirty-nine studies (5440 patients) of QAngio XA 3D/QFR and three studies (500 patients) of CAAS vFFR were included. QAngio XA 3D/QFR had good diagnostic accuracy to predict functionally significant fractional flow reserve (≤ 0.80 cut-off point); contrast-flow quantitative flow ratio had a sensitivity of 85% (95% confidence interval 78% to 90%) and a specificity of 91% (95% confidence interval 85% to 95%). A total of 95% of quantitative flow ratio measurements were within 0.14 of the fractional flow reserve. Data on the diagnostic accuracy of CAAS vFFR were limited and a full meta-analysis was not feasible. There were very few data on clinical and implementation outcomes. The simulation found that quantitative flow ratio slightly increased the revascularisation rate when compared with fractional flow reserve, from 40.2% to 42.0%. Quantitative flow ratio and fractional flow reserve resulted in similar numbers of subsequent coronary events. The base-case cost-effectiveness results showed that the test strategy with the highest net benefit was invasive coronary angiography with confirmatory fractional flow reserve. The next best strategies were QAngio XA 3D/QFR and CAAS vFFR (without fractional flow reserve). However, the difference in net benefit between this best strategy and the next best was small, ranging from 0.007 to 0.012 quality-adjusted life-years (or equivalently £140-240) per patient diagnosed at a cost-effectiveness threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year. LIMITATIONS Diagnostic accuracy evidence on CAAS vFFR, and evidence on the clinical impact of QAngio XA 3D/QFR, were limited. CONCLUSIONS Quantitative flow ratio as measured by QAngio XA 3D/QFR has good agreement and diagnostic accuracy compared with fractional flow reserve and is preferable to standard invasive coronary angiography alone. It appears to have very similar cost-effectiveness to fractional flow reserve and, therefore, pending further evidence on general clinical benefits and specific subgroups, could be a reasonable alternative. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of CAAS vFFR are uncertain. Randomised controlled trial evidence evaluating the effect of quantitative flow ratio on clinical and patient-centred outcomes is needed. FUTURE WORK Studies are required to assess the diagnostic accuracy and clinical feasibility of CAAS vFFR. Large ongoing randomised trials will hopefully inform the clinical value of QAngio XA 3D/QFR. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42019154575. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Evidence Synthesis programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 56. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Duarte
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Alexis Llewellyn
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| | - Ruth Walker
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Kath Wright
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| | - Simon Walker
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Claire Rothery
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Mark Simmonds
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Akil S, Hedeer F, Oddstig J, Olsson T, Jögi J, Erlinge D, Carlsson M, Arheden H, Hindorf C, Engblom H. Appropriate coronary revascularization can be accomplished if myocardial perfusion is quantified by positron emission tomography prior to treatment decision. J Nucl Cardiol 2021; 28:1664-1672. [PMID: 31705424 PMCID: PMC8421314 DOI: 10.1007/s12350-019-01938-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2019] [Revised: 10/14/2019] [Accepted: 10/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many patients undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) without the use of non-invasive stress testing prior to treatment. The aim of this study was to determine the potential added value of guiding revascularization by quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion prior to intervention. METHODS AND RESULTS Thirty-three patients (10 females) with suspected or established CAD who had been referred for a clinical coronary angiography (CA) with possibility for PCI were included. Adenosine stress and rest 13N-NH3 PET, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), and cardiopulmonary exercise test were performed 4 ± 3 weeks before and 5 ± 1 months after CA. The angiographer was blinded to the PET and CMR results. Myocardial flow reserve (MFR) < 2.0 by PET was considered abnormal. A PCI was performed in 19/33 patients. In 41% (11/27) of the revascularized vessel territories, a normal regional MFR was found prior to the PCI and no improvement in MFR was found at follow-up (P = 0.9). However, vessel territories with regional MFR < 2.0 at baseline improved significantly after PCI (P = 0.003). Of the 14 patients not undergoing PCI, four had MFR < 2.0 in one or more coronary territories. CONCLUSION Assessment of quantitative myocardial perfusion prior to revascularization could lead to more appropriate use of CA when managing patients with stable CAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahnaz Akil
- Department of Radiological Sciences, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Clinical Physiology, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
| | - Fredrik Hedeer
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Clinical Physiology, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Jenny Oddstig
- Radiation Physics, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Thomas Olsson
- Radiation Physics, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Jonas Jögi
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Clinical Physiology, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - David Erlinge
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Cardiology, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Marcus Carlsson
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Clinical Physiology, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Håkan Arheden
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Clinical Physiology, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Henrik Engblom
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Clinical Physiology, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Saeidifard F, Wang Y, Medina-Inojosa JR, Squires RW, Huang HH, Thomas RJ. Multicomponent Cardiac Rehabilitation and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Stable Angina: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes 2021; 5:727-741. [PMID: 34355130 PMCID: PMC8325103 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2021.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To carry out a systematic review of the effect of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and its components on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with stable angina. Methods We searched the databases including Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and EBSCO CINAHL from their inception up to November 1, 2017. The search was not restricted to time or publication status but was limited to the English language. Two independent investigators screened the identified studies and extracted the data in duplicate. We reviewed the included studies and, where possible, pooled their results and conducted meta-analyses. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Collaboration tools. Results The search identified 7508 studies. Ten randomized trials including 4005 participants with the mean (SD) age of 59.6 (5.7) years were considered eligible for inclusion in our analyses. The results of meta-analyses of exercise-based CR for patients with stable angina revealed that CR improved exercise capacity (the difference between baseline and follow-up was 0.76 watt [0.49 to 1.02] higher in the CR group vs the non-CR group) and decreased angina frequency (standard mean difference, -0.27 [CI, -0.43 to 0.11]). No significant differences were noted in other outcomes, including quality of life. Mortality could not be adequately assessed because it was analyzed in only 1 exercise-based CR study. Conclusion Our systematic review, involving a relatively small number of studies with low to moderate risk of bias and with considerable heterogeneity, found a significant decrease in angina frequency and increase in exercise capacity in patients with stable angina who participated in an exercise-based CR program. Studies involving the impact of components of CR are limited and generally report beneficial outcomes. Additional studies are needed to clarify the possible role of CR in the management of patients with stable angina.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farzane Saeidifard
- Division of Preventive Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.,Department of Internal Medicine, Lenox Hill Hospital-Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, NY
| | - Yanhui Wang
- Cardiac Rehabilitation Center, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beijing First Hospital of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Jose R Medina-Inojosa
- Division of Preventive Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Ray W Squires
- Division of Preventive Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Hsu-Hang Huang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Huang Chiu-Yung Chinese Medical Clinic, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Randal J Thomas
- Division of Preventive Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Boden WE, Stone PH. To stent or not to stent? Treating angina after ISCHEMIA-why a conservative approach with optimal medical therapy is the preferred initial management strategy for chronic coronary syndromes: insights from the ISCHEMIA trial. Eur Heart J 2021; 42:1394-1400. [PMID: 33827137 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab069.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- William E Boden
- VA New England Healthcare System, Boston University School of Medicine, VA Boston Campus, 150 S. Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02130, USA
| | - Peter H Stone
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Filatova AY, Osokina AK, Potekhina AV, Romasov IV, Kotkina TI, Shchinova AM, Noeva EA, Arefieva TI, Barabanova EA, Merkulov EV, Samko AN, Provatorov SI. [Analysis of the causes of repeat stenosis of the coronary arteries after elective stenting in patients with stable angina pectoris]. TERAPEVT ARKH 2021; 93:59-65. [PMID: 33720627 DOI: 10.26442/00403660.2021.01.200594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
AIM Coronary stenting is the evidence-based treatment approach of stable angina. The objective was to determine the incidence of restenosis or atherosclerosis progression which led to the need for coronary angiography according to a single center registry data. MATERIALS AND METHODS The procedure and clinical data of 3732 (2897 males) consecutive stable coronary artery disease patients undergoing coronary stenting, over five years between March 2010 and September 2014, were subject of this study. Over the next 4 years, 1487 (1173 males) patients were re-evaluated due to angina reoccurrence. 699 patients demonstrated the indications for coronary angiography. RESULTS The restenosis of the previously stented segment was detected in 84 (12%) cases, the progression of coronary atherosclerosis in 306 (44%), the combination of restenosis and atherosclerosis progression in 63 (9%), and the absence of these complications in 245 (35%) cases. The progression of coronary atherosclerosis was the leading indication for the repeat angiography and revascularization (44 and 58%, respectively); p0.05. The basal level of hsCRP2 mg/l had a prognostic significance for the development of combined event (the restenosis and atherosclerosis progression): AUC 0.65 (0.500.75), OR 3.0 (1.17.9), p0.05. CONCLUSION The progression of coronary atherosclerosis was the leading indication for the repeat angiography and repeat revascularization during 2 years after coronary stenting. The hsCRP level 2 mg/l at baseline had a prognostic significance for the development of restenosis in previously stented segment and coronary atherosclerosis progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - A K Osokina
- National Medical Research Center of Cardiology
| | | | - I V Romasov
- National Medical Research Center of Cardiology
| | - T I Kotkina
- National Medical Research Center of Cardiology
| | | | - E A Noeva
- National Medical Research Center of Cardiology
| | | | - E A Barabanova
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
| | | | - A N Samko
- National Medical Research Center of Cardiology
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Boden WE, Bhatt DL. Translating the findings of ISCHEMIA into clinical practice: a challenging START. EUROINTERVENTION 2020; 16:e953-e956. [DOI: 10.4244/eijv16i12a174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
10
|
Laukkanen JA, Kunutsor SK. Revascularization versus medical therapy for the treatment of stable coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of contemporary randomized controlled trials. Int J Cardiol 2020; 324:13-21. [PMID: 33068645 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Revised: 09/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of contemporary randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare clinical outcomes among stable coronary artery disease (CAD) patients treated with revascularization [percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) or both] plus medical therapy (MT) versus MT alone. METHODS Prospective RCTs were sought from MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science up to April 2020. Data was extracted on study characteristics, methods, and outcomes. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled for the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), revascularizations, rehospitalizations, or stroke; its individual components and other cardiovascular endpoints. RESULTS Twelve unique RCTs comprising of 15,774 patients were included. There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality risk (0.95, 95% CI: 0.86-1.06); however, revascularization plus MT reduced the risk of the composite outcome of all-cause mortality, MI, revascularizations, rehospitalizations, or stroke (0.69, 95% CI: 0.55-0.87); unplanned revascularization (0.53, 95% CI: 0.40-0.71); and fatal MI (0.65, 95% CI: 0.49-0.84). Revascularization plus MT reduced the risk of stroke at 1 year (0.44, 95% CI: 0.30-0.65) and unplanned revascularization and the composite outcome of all-cause mortality, MI, revascularizations, rehospitalizations, or stroke at 2-5 years. CONCLUSIONS Revascularization plus MT does not confer survival advantage beyond that of MT among patients with stable CAD. However, revascularization plus MT may reduce the overall risk of the combined outcome of mortality, MI, revascularizations, rehospitalizations, or stroke, which could be driven by a decrease in the risk of unplanned revascularizations or fatal MI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jari A Laukkanen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland; Central Finland Health Care District, Department of Medicine, Jyväskylä, Finland; Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
| | - Setor K Kunutsor
- National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Learning & Research Building (Level 1), Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, Byrne RA, Collet JP, Falk V, Head SJ, Jüni P, Kastrati A, Koller A, Kristensen SD, Niebauer J, Richter DJ, Seferovic PM, Sibbing D, Stefanini GG, Windecker S, Yadav R, Zembala MO. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 2020; 40:87-165. [PMID: 30165437 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4042] [Impact Index Per Article: 1010.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
|
12
|
R. Figulla H, Lauten A, S. Maier L, Sechtem U, Silber S, Thiele H. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Stable Coronary Heart Disease -Is Less More? DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2020; 117:137-144. [PMID: 32234189 PMCID: PMC7132080 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2019] [Revised: 08/07/2019] [Accepted: 12/30/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This review concerns the putative benefit of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) over optimal medical therapy (OMT) for symptomatic patients with stable angina pectoris, or for asymptomatic persons in whom screening tests have revealed coronary heart disease (CHD; this entity has been newly designated chronic coronary syndrome, or CCS). Moreover, it addresses the question whether the indications for which PCI is now performed in Germany on patients with CCS are consistent with current scientific knowledge. METHODS The pathophysiological concept of CHD and ischemia induction is discussed in the light of the scientific literature. This concept implies that PCI might be beneficial in the treatment of CCS. The benefit of PCI over OMT has now been evaluated in seven randomized trials (the so-called milestone trials). The current situation in Germany is presented here as well, on the basis of the available data. RESULTS The pathophysiological concept of CHD implies that the particular coronary artery stenoses that are likely to give rise to a myocardial infarction (the so-called vulnerable plaques) cannot be identified prospectively with current methods. Moreover, a coronary artery stenosis will not necessarily cause myocardial ischemia. All of the randomized trials carried out to date that have compared OMT to PCI-plus-OMT in patients with CCS have led to the conclusion that PCI, because it focuses on individual coronary artery stenoses, cannot prolong survival or lower the incidence of myocardial infarction over the long term. This remains the case even if a single coronary artery stenosis is known to be causing moderate or severe myocardial ischemia (a conclusion of the ISCHEMIA trial). A PCI performed only because the coronary stenosis or stenoses meet certain morphological criteria, without any demonstration of a resulting functional disturbance, is generally detrimental to the health of the patient, with rare exceptions, and is inconsistent with the recommendations of current guidelines. The number of PCIs being performed in Germany at present is high compared to other countries; this arouses concern that the indications for it may be dubious in many cases. CONCLUSION Current data imply that PCI for CCS does not improve outcomes in a large percentage of cases. A symptomatic benefit exists only in patients with frequent angina pectoris. The selection of CCS patients for PCI needs to be more strictly bound to the recommendations of current guidelines, particularly in Germany.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alexander Lauten
- Department of Cardiology (CBF), Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin
| | - Lars S. Maier
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Regensburg
| | | | - Sigmund Silber
- Cardiology practice, Munich and Stent Therapy at the Isar Heart Center, Munich
| | - Holger Thiele
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Leipzig Heart Center
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this review is to summarize landmark studies and recent evidence in support for and against benefits of routine percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD). RECENT FINDINGS Randomized controlled trials have raised uncertainty regarding the prognostic benefits of routine PCI in patients with SIHD. The benefits of PCI to improve symptoms and quality of life (QOL), thought to be more established, was brought into question recently by the ORBITA trial. Two hundred participants with single vessel SIHD optimized first on antianginal therapy were randomized to PCI or sham PCI procedure. At 6 weeks, there was no significant difference in the primary endpoint of exercise time increment (PCI minus sham PCI 16.6 s, 95% confidence interval -8.9 to 42.0 s, P = 0.20), or secondary endpoints of change in angina or QOL scores between the groups. SUMMARY Findings from this first placebo-controlled trial of PCI in patients with single vessel SIHD suggest that PCI need not necessarily be the first line or default strategy for symptomatic improvement. Results from the ongoing ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches) trial will provide further guidance regarding symptomatic and prognostic benefits of early angiography and revascularization for higher risk SIHD patients with moderate-severe ischemia.
Collapse
|
14
|
Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, Byrne RA, Collet JP, Falk V, Head SJ, Jüni P, Kastrati A, Koller A, Kristensen SD, Niebauer J, Richter DJ, Seferović PM, Sibbing D, Stefanini GG, Windecker S, Yadav R, Zembala MO. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. EUROINTERVENTION 2019; 14:1435-1534. [PMID: 30667361 DOI: 10.4244/eijy19m01_01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 332] [Impact Index Per Article: 66.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Franz-Josef Neumann
- Department of Cardiology & Angiology II, University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Bad Krozingen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Xiao S, Fan L, Dai H. Omaha System‐based discharge guidance improves knowledge and behavior in Mainland Chinese patients with angina who are not receiving interventional treatment: A randomized controlled trial. Jpn J Nurs Sci 2018; 16:355-363. [PMID: 30485665 DOI: 10.1111/jjns.12244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2017] [Revised: 08/27/2018] [Accepted: 10/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Shiqi Xiao
- Department of NursingShengjing Hospital of China Medical University Shenyang China
| | - Ling Fan
- Department of NursingShengjing Hospital of China Medical University Shenyang China
| | - Heng Dai
- Department of Cardiovascular MedicineShengjing Hospital of China Medical University Shenyang China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Khan SU, Singh M, Lone AN, Khan MS, Fatima U, Saad AB, Riaz H, Opoku-Asare I, Kaluski E. Meta-analysis of long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention versus medical therapy in stable coronary artery disease. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2018; 26:433-436. [PMID: 30226394 DOI: 10.1177/2047487318800511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Safi U Khan
- 1 Department of Medicine, West Virginia University, USA
| | - Maninder Singh
- 2 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Guthrie Health System/Robert Packer Hospital, USA
| | - Ahmad N Lone
- 1 Department of Medicine, West Virginia University, USA
| | | | - Urooj Fatima
- 4 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Howard University Hospital, USA
| | - Abu Bakar Saad
- 5 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nishtar Hospital, Pakistan
| | - Haris Riaz
- 6 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, USA
| | - Isaac Opoku-Asare
- 4 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Howard University Hospital, USA
| | - Edo Kaluski
- 2 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Guthrie Health System/Robert Packer Hospital, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sousa-Uva M, Neumann FJ, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, Byrne RA, Collet JP, Falk V, Head SJ, Jüni P, Kastrati A, Koller A, Kristensen SD, Niebauer J, Richter DJ, Seferovic PM, Sibbing D, Stefanini GG, Windecker S, Yadav R, Zembala MO. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2018; 55:4-90. [PMID: 30165632 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 347] [Impact Index Per Article: 57.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
|
18
|
Peeters G, Barker AL, Talevski J, Ackerman I, Ayton DR, Reid C, Evans SM, Stoelwinder JU, McNeil JJ. Do patients have a say? A narrative review of the development of patient-reported outcome measures used in elective procedures for coronary revascularisation. Qual Life Res 2018; 27:1369-1380. [PMID: 29380228 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-018-1795-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/22/2018] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) capture health information from the patient's perspective that can be used when weighing up benefits, risks and costs of treatment. This is important for elective procedures such as those for coronary revascularisation. Patients should be involved in the development of PROMs to accurately capture outcomes that are important for the patient. The aims of this review are to identify if patients were involved in the development of cardiovascular-specific PROMs used for assessing outcomes from elective coronary revascularisation, and to explore what methods were used to capture patient perspectives. METHODS PROMs for evaluating outcomes from elective coronary revascularisation were identified from a previous review and an updated systematic search. The studies describing the development of the PROMs were reviewed for information on patient input in their conceptual and/or item development. RESULTS 24 PROMs were identified from a previous review and three additional PROMs were identified from the updated search. Full texts were obtained for 26 of the 27 PROMs. The 26 studies (11 multidimensional, 15 unidimensional) were reviewed. Only nine studies reported developing PROMs using patient input. For eight PROMs, the inclusion of patient input could not be judged due to insufficient information in the full text. CONCLUSIONS Only nine of the 26 reviewed PROMs used in elective coronary revascularisation reported involving patients in their conceptual and/or item development, while patient input was unclear for eight PROMs. These findings suggest that the patient's perspective is often overlooked or poorly described in the development of PROMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geeske Peeters
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. .,Global Brain Health Institute, University of California, San Francisco
- Trinity College, Dublin, Trinity College, Lloyd Building, Dublin 2, Ireland.
| | - Anna L Barker
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jason Talevski
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Ilana Ackerman
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Darshini R Ayton
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Christopher Reid
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Sue M Evans
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Johannes U Stoelwinder
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - John J McNeil
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Xia J, Xu J, Hu S, Hao H, Yin C, Xu D. Impact of glycemic variability on the occurrence of periprocedural myocardial infarction and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after coronary intervention in patients with stable angina pectoris at 6months follow-up. Clin Chim Acta 2017. [PMID: 28624498 DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2017.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We explored the impact of glycemic variability on the occurrence of periprocedural myocardial infarction and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after coronary intervention in patients with stable angina pectoris (SAP) at 6months follow-up. METHODS From May 2015 to April 2016, a total of 746 patients with SAP were divided to high glycemic variability group (H group) (n=261) and low glycemic variability group (L group) (n=485). The primary end point was incidence of periprocedural myocardial infarction and MACE at 6months follow-up. RESULTS The occurrence of periprocedural myocardial infarction occurred in 18.8% of patients in H group and in 12.4% in L group (P=0.03). The incidence of MACE at 6months follow-up was 9.6% in H group and 4.5% in L group (P=0.01). Multivariable analysis suggested that high glycemic variability conferred a 53% risk increment of 6months follow-up MACE (odds ratio 2.13, 95% confidence interval 1.85-5.38; P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS The trial shows that higher blood glucose variability was correlated with higher incidence of periprocedural myocardial infarction and MACE at 6months follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinggang Xia
- Department of Cardiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China
| | - Ji Xu
- Department of Cardiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China
| | - Shaodong Hu
- Department of Cardiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China
| | - Hengjian Hao
- Department of Cardiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China
| | - Chunlin Yin
- Department of Cardiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China.
| | - Dong Xu
- Department of Cardiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ferguson Jr TB. Physiology of in-situ arterial revascularization in coronary artery bypass grafting: Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative factors and influences. World J Cardiol 2016; 8:623-637. [PMID: 27957249 PMCID: PMC5124721 DOI: 10.4330/wjc.v8.i11.623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2016] [Revised: 06/29/2016] [Accepted: 09/22/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Surgical revascularization with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has become established as the most effective interventional therapy for patients with moderately severe and severe stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD). This recommendation is based on traditional 5-year outcomes of mortality and avoidance of myocardial infarction leading to reintervention and/or cardiac death. However, these results are confounded in that they challenge the traditional CABG surgical tenets of completeness of anatomic revascularization, the impact of arterial revascularization on late survival, and the lesser impact of secondary prevention following CABG on late outcomes. Moreover, the emergence of physiologic-based revascularization with percutaneous cardiovascular intervention as an alternative strategy for revascularization in SIHD raises the question of whether there are similar physiologic effects in CABG. Finally, the ongoing ISCHEMIA trial is specifically addressing the importance of the physiology of moderate or severe ischemia in optimizing therapeutic interventions in SIHD. So it is time to address the role that physiology plays in surgical revascularization. The long-standing anatomic framework for surgical revascularization is no longer sufficient to explain the mechanisms for short-term and long-term outcomes in CABG. Novel intraoperative imaging technologies have generated important new data on the physiologic blood flow and myocardial perfusion responses to revascularization on an individual graft and global basis. Long-standing assumptions about technical issues such as competitive flow are brought into question by real-time visualization of the physiology of revascularization. Our underestimation of the impact of Guideline Directed Medical Therapy, or Optimal Medical Therapy, on the physiology of preoperative SIHD, and the full impact of secondary prevention on post-intervention SIHD, must be better understood. In this review, these issues are addressed through the perspective of multi-arterial revascularization in CABG, which is emerging (after 30 years) as the “standard of care” for CABG. In fact, it is the physiology of these arterial grafts that is the mechanism for their impact on long-term outcomes in CABG. Moreover, a better understanding of all of these preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative components of the physiology of revascularization that will generate the next, more granular body of knowledge about CABG, and enable surgeons to design and execute a better surgical revascularization procedure for patients in the future.
Collapse
|
21
|
Godino C, Colombo A, Margonato A. Ivabradine in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease: A Rationale for Use in Addition to and Beyond Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Clin Drug Investig 2016; 37:105-120. [PMID: 27766510 DOI: 10.1007/s40261-016-0472-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Heart rate is an established prognostic marker for longevity and is an important contributor in the pathophysiology of various cardiovascular diseases, including ischemic heart disease and heart failure. Most ischemic episodes are triggered by an increase in heart rate, which causes an imbalance between myocardial oxygen delivery and consumption. In addition, increased heart rate is a modifiable risk factor for chronic heart failure. Ivabradine, an inhibitor of If ion channels, is an approved second-line anti-ischemic drug for the treatment of angina. Ivabradine has been shown to decrease the risk of hospitalization in patients with chronic heart failure who were previously treated with β-blockers, renin-angiotensin system blockers or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. This review describes the rationale for the pathophysiological and clinical use of ivabradine as an anti-ischemic agent in patients with stable coronary disease and highlights its benefits and drawbacks compared with other first- and second-line anti-anginal drugs. The review also highlights the role of ivabradine as a treatment for patients with high-risk coronary artery disease in whom first-line anti-anginal drugs are insufficient or inadequate and percutaneous coronary intervention is contraindicated or revascularization is incomplete or unsuitable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cosmo Godino
- Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Department, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
| | - Antonio Colombo
- Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Department, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.,EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Margonato
- Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Department, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Werdan K. [National disease management guidelines (NVL) for chronic CAD : What is new, what is particularly important?]. Herz 2016; 41:537-60. [PMID: 27586137 DOI: 10.1007/s00059-016-4474-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Coronary heart disease (CAD) is widespread and affects 1 in 10 of the population in the age group 40-79 years in Germany. The German national management guidelines on chronic CAD comprise evidence and expert-based recommendations for the diagnostics of chronic stable CAD as well as for interdisciplinary/multidisciplinary therapy and care of patients with stable CAD. The focus is on the diagnostics, prevention, medication therapy, revascularization, rehabilitation, general practitioner care and coordination of care. Recommendations for optimizing cooperation between all medical specialties involved as well as the definition of mandatory and appropriate measures are essential aims of the guidelines both to improve the quality of care and to strengthen the position of the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Werdan
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin III, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Non-acute percutaneous coronary intervention versus medical therapy in patients with ischaemic heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
|
24
|
Stone GW, Hochman JS, Williams DO, Boden WE, Ferguson TB, Harrington RA, Maron DJ. Medical Therapy With Versus Without Revascularization in Stable Patients With Moderate and Severe Ischemia: The Case for Community Equipoise. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016; 67:81-99. [PMID: 26616030 PMCID: PMC5545795 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2015] [Revised: 09/10/2015] [Accepted: 09/22/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
All patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) should be managed with guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), which reduces progression of atherosclerosis and prevents coronary thrombosis. Revascularization is also indicated in patients with SIHD and progressive or refractory symptoms, despite medical management. Whether a strategy of routine revascularization (with percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery as appropriate) plus GDMT reduces rates of death or myocardial infarction, or improves quality of life compared to an initial approach of GDMT alone in patients with substantial ischemia is uncertain. Opinions run strongly on both sides, and evidence may be used to support either approach. Careful review of the data demonstrates the limitations of our current knowledge, resulting in a state of community equipoise. The ongoing ISCHEMIA trial (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches) is being performed to determine the optimal approach to managing patients with SIHD, moderate-to-severe ischemia, and symptoms that can be controlled medically. (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches [ISCHEMIA]; NCT01471522).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregg W Stone
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York.
| | - Judith S Hochman
- Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Clinical Research Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - David O Williams
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - William E Boden
- Department of Medicine, Samuel S. Stratton VA Medical Center, Albany Medical Center and Albany Medical College, Albany, New York
| | - T Bruce Ferguson
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, East Carolina Heart Institute, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina
| | - Robert A Harrington
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - David J Maron
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, Collet JP, Cremer J, Falk V, Filippatos G, Hamm C, Head SJ, Jüni P, Kappetein AP, Kastrati A, Knuuti J, Landmesser U, Laufer G, Neumann FJ, Richter DJ, Schauerte P, Sousa Uva M, Stefanini GG, Taggart DP, Torracca L, Valgimigli M, Wijns W, Witkowski A. 2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. EUROINTERVENTION 2015; 10:1024-94. [PMID: 25187201 DOI: 10.4244/eijy14m09_01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 211] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Windecker
- Cardiology, Bern University Hospital, Freiburgstrasse 4, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, Collet JP, Cremer J, Falk V, Filippatos G, Hamm C, Head SJ, Jüni P, Kappetein AP, Kastrati A, Knuuti J, Landmesser U, Laufer G, Neumann FJ, Richter DJ, Schauerte P, Sousa Uva M, Stefanini GG, Taggart DP, Torracca L, Valgimigli M, Wijns W, Witkowski A. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J 2014; 35:2541-619. [PMID: 25173339 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3326] [Impact Index Per Article: 332.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
|
27
|
Onuigbo MAC, Agbasi N. Too much coronary angioplasty in the USA?: less may be better - the conflicting roles of inexactness of medicine as a science, asymmetric information, technologic imperative, unnecessary care and ethicomedicinomics in US healthcare. Int J Clin Pract 2014; 68:1056-9. [PMID: 25196182 DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.12446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
US healthcare expenditure per capita far exceeds that of any other nation in the world. Indeed, over the last 15 years, the USA has distantly surpassed most countries in the developed world in total healthcare expenditures per capita with the USA now spending 17.4% of its gross domestic product (GDP) on healthcare ($7960 per capita), compared with only 8.5% of GDP in Japan ($2878 per capita), a distant second. Consequently, by current projections, the US healthcare bill will have ballooned from $2.5 trillion in 2009 to over $4.6 trillion by 2020. Such spending growth rates are unsustainable and the system would soon go broke if not corrected. The drivers of these spending growth rates in US healthcare are several and varied. Indeed, in September 2012, the Institute of Medicine reported that US healthcare squandered $750 billion in 2009 through unneeded care, Byzantine paperwork, fraud and other wasteful activities. Recently, the question was raised as to whether we have too much coronary angioplasty in the USA. In this analysis, we examine these and other various related aspects of US healthcare, make comparisons with other national healthcare delivery systems, and suggest several reengineering modalities to help fix these compellingly glaring glitches and maladies of US healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A C Onuigbo
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Nephrology, Mayo Clinic Health System, Eau Claire, WI, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Nadeau SE, Rose DK, Dobkin B, Wu SS, Dai YE, Schofield R, Duncan PW. Likelihood of myocardial infarction during stroke rehabilitation preceded by cardiovascular screening and an exercise tolerance test: the Locomotor Experience Applied Post-Stroke (LEAPS) trial. Int J Stroke 2014; 9:1097-104. [PMID: 25156340 DOI: 10.1111/ijs.12354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2014] [Accepted: 06/22/2014] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronary artery disease is highly prevalent in patients with stroke, but because revascularization does not improve major clinical outcomes in patients with stable coronary artery disease relative to intensive medical therapy, routine evaluation for this disease is not warranted in stroke patients. However, it might be warranted in patients destined to undergo vigorous physical therapy. The Locomotor Experience Applied Post-Stroke study, a randomized controlled trial of 408 participants that tested the relative efficacy of two rehabilitation techniques on functional walking level, provided the opportunity to address this question. AIM The study aims to test the efficacy of screening for cardiovascular disease and an exercise tolerance test in assuring safety among patients undergoing vigorous rehabilitation for gait impairment. METHODS All participants were screened for serious cardiovascular and pulmonary conditions. At six-weeks poststroke, they also completed a cardiovascular screening inventory and underwent an exercise tolerance test involving bicycle ergometry. Participants received 36, 90-min sessions of a prescribed physical therapy (three per week), initiated at either two-months or six-months poststroke. RESULTS Twenty-nine participants were excluded on the basis of the cardiac screening questionnaire, and 15 failed the exercise tolerance test for cardiovascular reasons. No participant experienced a cardiac event during a treatment session. Two participants experienced myocardial infarctions, but continued in the trial. In three additional participants, myocardial infarctions caused or contributed to death. CONCLUSIONS The combination of a negative cardiac screen and the absence of exercise tolerance test failure appeared to have a high negative predictive value for cardiac events during treatment, despite the likelihood of a high prevalence of coronary artery disease in our population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen E Nadeau
- Research Service, Brain Rehabilitation Research Center, Malcom Randall VA Medical Center, Gainesville, FL, USA; Department of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Pandit A, Aryal MR, Aryal Pandit A, Hakim FA, Giri S, Mainali NR, Sharma P, Lee HR, Fortuin FD, Mookadam F. Preventive PCI versus culprit lesion stenting during primary PCI in acute STEMI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Heart 2014; 1:e000012. [PMID: 25332779 PMCID: PMC4189298 DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2013-000012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2013] [Revised: 01/22/2014] [Accepted: 01/25/2014] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim The benefit of preventive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been shown in randomised trials. However, all the randomised trials are underpowered to detect benefit in cardiac death. We aim to systematically review evidence on the cardiac mortality benefit of preventive PCI in patients presenting with acute STEMI in randomised patient populations. Methods PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane and clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched for studies published until 30 September 2013. The studies were limited to randomised clinical trials. Independent observers abstracted the data on outcomes, characteristics and qualities of studies included. Fixed effect model was employed for meta-analysis. Heterogeneity of studies included was analysed using I2 statistics. Results In three randomised clinical trials published, involving 748 patients with acute STEMI and multivessel disease, 416 patients were randomised to preventive PCI and 332 to culprit-only PCI. Patients undergoing preventive PCI had significant lower risk of cardiovascular deaths (pooled OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.83, p=0.01, I2=0%), repeat revascularisation (pooled OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.44, p=0.00001, I2=0%) and non-fatal myocardial infarction (pooled OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.75, p=0.005, I2=0%) compared with culprit-only revascularisation. Conclusions In patients presenting with acute STEMI and significant multivessel coronary artery disease, based on our data, preventive PCI is associated with lower risk of cardiovascular mortality compared with primary PCI of only the culprit artery. This finding needs to be confirmed in larger adequately powered randomised clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anil Pandit
- Division of Cardiovascular Diseases , Mayo Clinic , Scottsdale, Arizona , USA
| | - Madan Raj Aryal
- Department of Internal Medicine , Reading Hospital , West Reading, Pennsylvania , USA
| | | | - Fayaz Ahmad Hakim
- Division of Cardiovascular Diseases , Mayo Clinic , Scottsdale, Arizona , USA
| | - Smith Giri
- Department of Internal Medicine , University of Tennessee , Memphis, Tennessee , USA
| | - Naba Raj Mainali
- Department of Internal Medicine , Reading Hospital , West Reading, Pennsylvania , USA
| | - Prashant Sharma
- Department of Internal Medicine , Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota , USA
| | - Howard R Lee
- Division of Cardiovascular Diseases , Mayo Clinic , Scottsdale, Arizona , USA
| | - F David Fortuin
- Division of Cardiovascular Diseases , Mayo Clinic , Scottsdale, Arizona , USA
| | - Farouk Mookadam
- Division of Cardiovascular Diseases , Mayo Clinic , Scottsdale, Arizona , USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Arzt M, Floras JS. Preventing Cardiovascular Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Have We Been Asleep at the Switch? Can J Cardiol 2014; 30:8-11. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2013.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2013] [Revised: 09/05/2013] [Accepted: 09/08/2013] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
31
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Management of chronic angina has evolved dramatically in the last few decades with several options for pharmacotherapy outlined in various evidence-based guidelines. AREAS COVERED There is a growing list of drugs that are currently being investigated for treatment of chronic angina. These also include several herbal medications, which are now being scientifically evaluated as potential alternative or even adjunctive therapy for angina. Gene- and cell-based therapies have opened yet another avenue for management of chronic refractory angina in 'no-option' patients who are not candidates for either percutaneous or surgical revascularization and are on optimal medical therapy. An extensive review of literature using PUBMED, Cochrane database, clinical trial databases of the USA and European Union was done and summarized in this review. This review will attempt to discuss the traditional as well as novel therapeutic agents for angina. EXPERT OPINION Several pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapeutic options are now available for treatment and management of chronic refractory angina. Renewed interest in traditional therapies and cell- and gene-based modalities with targeted drug delivery systems will open the doors for personalized therapy for patients with chronic refractory angina.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashish K Gupta
- University of Florida, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine , 1600 SW Archer Road, P.O. Box 100277, Gainesville, FL 32610-0277 , USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Epstein SE, Waksman R, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Panza JA. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Medical Therapy in Stable Coronary Artery Disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 6:993-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2013] [Accepted: 07/21/2013] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
33
|
Waters DD. Papering over the cracks: meta-analysis to define the role of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with stable angina. Can J Cardiol 2012; 29:411-4. [PMID: 22985786 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2012.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2012] [Accepted: 07/10/2012] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
34
|
Marini I, Moschini R, Corso AD, Mura U. Alpha-crystallin: an ATP-independent complete molecular chaperone toward sorbitol dehydrogenase. Cell Mol Life Sci 2005; 62:599-605. [PMID: 15747064 PMCID: PMC11365903 DOI: 10.1007/s00018-005-4474-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
alpha-Crystallin, the major component of the vertebrate lens, is known to interact with proteins undergoing denaturation and to protect them from aggregation phenomena. Bovine lens sorbitol dehydrogenase (SDH) was previously shown to be completely protected by alpha-crystallin from thermally induced aggregation and inactivation. Here we report that alpha-crystallin, in the presence of the SDH pyridine cofactor NAD(H), can exert a remarkable chaperone action by favoring the recovery of the enzyme activity from chemically denaturated SDH up to 77%. Indeed, even in the absence of the cofactor, alpha-crystallin present at a ratio with SDH of 20:1 (w:w) allows a recovery of 35% of the enzyme activity. The effect of ATP in enhancing alpha-crystallin-promoted SDH renaturation appears to be both nonspecific and to not involve hydrolysis phenomena, thus confirming that the chaperone action of alpha-crystallin is not dependent on ATP as energy donor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I. Marini
- Dipartimento di Fisiologia e Biochimica, Sezione di Biochimica, Università di Pisa, Via S. Zeno, 51, 56100 Pisa, Italy
| | - R. Moschini
- Dipartimento di Fisiologia e Biochimica, Sezione di Biochimica, Università di Pisa, Via S. Zeno, 51, 56100 Pisa, Italy
| | - A. Del Corso
- Dipartimento di Fisiologia e Biochimica, Sezione di Biochimica, Università di Pisa, Via S. Zeno, 51, 56100 Pisa, Italy
| | - U. Mura
- Dipartimento di Fisiologia e Biochimica, Sezione di Biochimica, Università di Pisa, Via S. Zeno, 51, 56100 Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|