Stem Cell Therapy for the Treatment of Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Single cell and lineage tracing studies reveal the impact of CD34+ cells on myocardial fibrosis during heart failure

BACKGROUND

CD34⁺ cells have been used to treat the patients with heart failure, but the outcome is variable. It is of great significance to scrutinize the fate and the mechanism of CD34⁺ cell differentiation in vivo during heart failure and explore its intervention strategy.

METHODS

We performed single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) of the total non-cardiomyocytes and enriched Cd34-tdTomato⁺ lineage cells in the murine (male Cd34-CreERT2; Rosa26-tdTomato mice) pressure overload model (transverse aortic constriction, TAC), and total non-cardiomyocytes from human adult hearts. Then, in order to determine the origin of CD34⁺ cell that plays a role in myocardial fibrosis, bone marrow transplantation model was performed. Furthermore, to further clarify the role of CD34 + cells in myocardial remodeling in response to TAC injury, we generated Cd34-CreERT2; Rosa26-eGFP-DTA (Cre/DTA) mice.

RESULTS

By analyzing the transcriptomes of 59,505 single cells from the mouse heart and 22,537 single cells from the human heart, we illustrated the dynamics of cell landscape during the progression of heart hypertrophy, including CD34⁺ cells, fibroblasts, endothelial and immune cells. By combining genetic lineage tracing and bone marrow transplantation models, we demonstrated that non-bone-marrow-derived CD34⁺ cells give rise to fibroblasts and endothelial cells, while bone-marrow-derived CD34⁺ cell turned into immune cells only in response to pressure overload. Interestingly, partial depletion of CD34⁺ cells alleviated the severity of myocardial fibrosis with a significant improvement of cardiac function in Cd34-CreERT2; Rosa26-eGFP-DTA model. Similar changes of non-cardiomyocyte composition and cellular heterogeneity of heart failure were also observed in human patient with heart failure. Furthermore, immunostaining showed a double labeling of CD34 and fibroblast markers in human heart tissue. Mechanistically, our single-cell pseudotime analysis of scRNA-seq data and in vitro cell culture study revealed that Wnt-β-catenin and TGFβ1/Smad pathways are critical in regulating CD34⁺ cell differentiation toward fibroblasts.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides a cellular landscape of CD34⁺ cell-derived cells in the hypertrophy heart of human and animal models, indicating that non-bone-marrow-derived CD34⁺ cells differentiating into fibroblasts largely account for cardiac fibrosis. These findings may provide novel insights for the pathogenesis of cardiac fibrosis and have further potential therapeutic implications for the heart failure.

Cell therapy for nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Cell therapy involves transplantation of human cells to promote repair of diseased or injured tissues and/or cells. Only a limited number of mostly small-scale trials have studied cell therapy in nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). We performed a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to assess the safety and efficacy of cell therapy in NICM. Electronic databases were searched for relevant RCTs from inception until August 2020. Outcomes assessed were left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter or volume (LVEDD), quality of life (QoL) indices, and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). Weighted mean differences (MDs) and standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated using random-effects methods. Eleven RCTs with 574 participants were included in the analysis. There was a significant increase in mean LVEF (MD, 4.17%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.66-6.69) and modest decrease in LVEDD (SMD, -0.50; 95% CI = -0.95 to -0.06) in patients treated with cell therapy compared with controls. Cell therapy was also associated with improvement in functional capacity, as assessed by the 6-minute walking distance (MD, 72.49 m; 95% CI = 3.44-141.53). No significant differences were seen in MACEs and QoL indices between treated and control groups. This meta-analysis suggests that cell therapy may improve LV systolic function and may be associated with improvement in LVEDD and functional capacity compared with maximal medical therapy. Cell therapy was safe, with no significant difference in MACEs between treatment and control groups. However, given the limitations of current studies, larger well-designed RCTs are needed to evaluate the efficacy of cell therapy in patients with NICM.

Stem cell therapy for dilated cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Stem cell therapy (SCT) has been proposed as an alternative treatment for dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), nonetheless its effectiveness remains debatable.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of SCT in adults with non-ischaemic DCM.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Embase for relevant trials in November 2020. We also searched two clinical trials registers in May 2020.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing stem/progenitor cells with no cells in adults with non-ischaemic DCM. We included co-interventions such as the administration of stem cell mobilizing agents. Studies were classified and analysed into three categories according to the comparison intervention, which consisted of no intervention/placebo, cell mobilization with cytokines, or a different mode of SCT. The first two comparisons (no cells in the control group) served to assess the efficacy of SCT while the third (different mode of SCT) served to complement the review with information about safety and other information of potential utility for a better understanding of the effects of SCT.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened all references for eligibility, assessed trial quality, and extracted data. We undertook a quantitative evaluation of data using random-effects meta-analyses. We evaluated heterogeneity using the I² statistic. We could not explore potential effect modifiers through subgroup analyses as they were deemed uninformative due to the scarce number of trials available. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. We created summary of findings tables using GRADEpro GDT. We focused our summary of findings on all-cause mortality, safety, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), performance status, and major adverse cardiovascular events.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 13 RCTs involving 762 participants (452 cell therapy and 310 controls). Only one study was at low risk of bias in all domains. There were many shortcomings in the publications that did not allow a precise assessment of the risk of bias in many domains. Due to the nature of the intervention, the main source of potential bias was lack of blinding of participants (performance bias). Frequently, the format of the continuous data available was not ideal for use in the meta-analysis and forced us to seek strategies for transforming data in a usable format. We are uncertain whether SCT reduces all-cause mortality in people with DCM compared to no intervention/placebo (mean follow-up 12 months) (risk ratio (RR) 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54 to 1.31; I² = 0%; studies = 7, participants = 361; very low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether SCT increases the risk of procedural complications associated with cells injection in people with DCM (data could not be pooled; studies = 7; participants = 361; very low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether SCT improves HRQoL (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.62, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.23; I² = 72%; studies = 5, participants = 272; very low-certainty evidence) and functional capacity (6-minute walk test) (mean difference (MD) 70.12 m, 95% CI -5.28 to 145.51; I² = 87%; studies = 5, participants = 230; very low-certainty evidence). SCT may result in a slight functional class (New York Heart Association) improvement (data could not be pooled; studies = 6, participants = 398; low-certainty evidence). None of the included studies reported major adverse cardiovascular events as defined in our protocol. SCT may not increase the risk of ventricular arrhythmia (data could not be pooled; studies = 8, participants = 504; low-certainty evidence). When comparing SCT to cell mobilization with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), we are uncertain whether SCT reduces all-cause mortality (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.31; I² = 39%; studies = 3, participants = 195; very low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether SCT increases the risk of procedural complications associated with cells injection (studies = 1, participants = 60; very low-certainty evidence). SCT may not improve HRQoL (MD 4.61 points, 95% CI -5.62 to 14.83; studies = 1, participants = 22; low-certainty evidence). SCT may improve functional capacity (6-minute walk test) (MD 140.14 m, 95% CI 119.51 to 160.77; I² = 0%; studies = 2, participants = 155; low-certainty evidence). None of the included studies reported MACE as defined in our protocol or ventricular arrhythmia. The most commonly reported outcomes across studies were based on physiological measures of cardiac function where there were some beneficial effects suggesting potential benefits of SCT in people with non-ischaemic DCM. However, it is unclear if this intermediate effects translates into clinical benefits for these patients. With regard to specific aspects related to the modality of cell therapy and its delivery, uncertainties remain as subgroup analyses could not be performed as planned, making it necessary to wait for the publication of several studies that are currently in progress before any firm conclusion can be reached.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We are uncertain whether SCT in people with DCM reduces the risk of all-cause mortality and procedural complications, improves HRQoL, and performance status (exercise capacity). SCT may improve functional class (NYHA), compared to usual care (no cells). Similarly, when compared to G-CSF, we are also uncertain whether SCT in people with DCM reduces the risk of all-cause mortality although some studies within this comparison observed a favourable effect that should be interpreted with caution. SCT may not improve HRQoL but may improve to some extent performance status (exercise capacity). Very low-quality evidence reflects uncertainty regarding procedural complications. These suggested beneficial effects of SCT, although uncertain due to the very low certainty of the evidence, are accompanied by favourable effects on some physiological measures of cardiac function. Presently, the most effective mode of administration of SCT and the population that could benefit the most is unclear. Therefore, it seems reasonable that use of SCT in people with DCM is limited to clinical research settings. Results of ongoing studies are likely to modify these conclusions.

Stem cells for treatment of cardiovascular diseases: An umbrella review of randomized controlled trials

AIMS

Stem cells are a promising therapy for various medical conditions. The literature regarding their adoption for the clinical care of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) is still conflicting. Therefore, our aim is to assess the strength and credibility of the evidence on clinical outcomes and application of stem cells derived from systematic reviews and meta-analyses of intervention studies in CVD.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Umbrella review of systematic reviews with meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using placebo/no intervention as control group. For meta-analyses of RCTs, outcomes with a random-effect p-value <0.05, the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) assessment was used, classifying the evidence from very low to high. From 184 abstracts initially identified, 11 meta-analyses (for a total of 34 outcomes) were included. Half of the outcomes were statistically significant (p < 0.05), indicating that stem cells are more useful than placebo. High certainty of evidence supports the associations of the use of stem cells with a better left ventricular end systolic volume and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in acute myocardial infarction; improved exercise time in refractory angina; a significant lower risk of amputation rate in critical limb ischemia; a higher successful rate in complete healing in case of lower extremities ulcer; and better values of LVEF in systolic heart failure, as compared to placebo.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

The adoption of stem cells in clinical practice is supported by a high certainty of strength in different CVD, with the highest strength in acute myocardial infarction and refractory angina.

The efficacy of bone marrow mononuclear stem cell transplantation in patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy-a meta analysis

Cardiomyopathy refers to a wide spectrum of heart pathologies that interfere with normal heart function. Management options of patients with cardiomyopathy depended mainly on the severity of the condition. Lifestyle modifications and regular exercise together with a healthy diet is compatible for mild conditions. Severe conditions, however, rely on medications or surgery. Here, we aim to investigate the efficacy of bone marrow mononuclear stem cell transplantation in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL for relevant clinical trials and excluded observational studies. We performed the quality assessment of this study following GRADE guidelines. The assessment of the risk of bias was performed by the Cochrane's risk of bias tool. We present an analysis of the following outcomes: left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), and six minutes walking test. Data were pooled as mean differences (MD) and relative confidence intervals (CI). The analysis of 667 patients from 11 studies receiving autologous bone marrow cell therapy for non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy is presented. A total of 338 patients were allocated to the treatment group, and 329 participants entered the control group. The mean age of the patients in the treatment group is 52.4 ± 4.3 years, while that of the control is 53.7 ± 3.7 years. Seven studies (14.18-23) reported transplantation through the intracoronary route. Table 1 shows a summary of the baseline characteristics of the included studies and participants, the number of injected cells, and the type of injected cells in each trial. Table 2 summarizes and illustrates the previous treatment history of included patients in each trial, as well as the baseline values of different scores used as outcome measures in this analysis. We found that bone marrow mononuclear stem cell therapy leads to significantly increased LVEF (MD = 4.54%, 95% CI [3.52, 5.56], P < 0.0001). Patients in the transplant group experienced less left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (millimeter) than the control arm (MD = -1.86 mm, 95% CI [-4.01, 0.29], P = 0.09). Additionally, Patients in the transplant group could walk 28.53 m more than the controls (MD = 28.53 m, 95% CI [2.51, 54.55], P = 0.03). Transplantation of bone marrow stem cells yields acceptable results regarding left ventricular ejection fraction and lowers the left ventricular end-diastolic diameter. Additionally, the six minutes walking test is improved in the transplant group. Table 1 Demographic data about the included participants Study Year Sample size Age, years Males, n (%) Diabetics, n (%) Route of administration Number of injected cells Type of injected cells TTT Control TTT Control TTT Control TTT Control Bartolucci 2015 12 11 58 ± 14 57 ± 11 8 (66.7) 9 (81.8) 2 (16.7) 1 (9.1) Intracoronary 1.94 × 10^6 CD34 +  Bocchi 2010 8 15 51 ± 15 NR NR NR NR Intracoronary NR NR Frljak 2018 30 30 56 ± 9 54 ± 11 27 (90) 26 (87) 3 (10) 2 (6) Trans-endocardial NR CD34 +  Hamshere 2015 15 14 57.67 ± 12.32 56.79 ± 9.8 10 12 9(59.9%) 8(57.1%) Intracoronary 4.91 × 10^6 CD34 +  Hu 2011 31 29 56.61 ± 9.72 58.27 ± 8.86 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Matrino 2015 82 78 51 ± 11.1 49.6 ± 11.1 73.1 68.3 NR NR Intracoronary 10^8 TTT, CD45, CD105, and CD133 Sant'Anna 2014 20 10 48.3 ± 8.71 51.6 ± 7.79 13(65) 5 (50%) NR NR Intra-myocardial 1.06 × 108 CD3, CD4, CD14, CD34, CD38, and CD45 Seth 2010 41 40 45 ± 15 49 ± 9 33 35 NR NR NR 168 × 10^6 Bone marrow mononuclear cells Vrtovec 2011 28 27 52 ± 8 54 ± 7 26 (93) 23 (85) NR NR Intracoronary 123 × 10^6 CD34 +  Vrtovec 2013 55 55 53 ± 8 55 ± 7 45 (82) 44 (80) NR NR Intracoronary NR NR Xiao 2017 16 20 49.5 ± 11.6 54.4 ± 11.6 9 (56.3) 14 (70.0) 6 (37.5) 5 (29.4) Intracoronary infusion (4.9 ± 1.7) × 108 (CD29, CD34, CD44, CD45, and CD166) Data are reported as mean ± SD or n (%) unless proved otherwise TTT treatment group, NR not reported Table 2 Previous history of treatment and drug intake by the patients Study Year Medical therapy, n (%) Baseline scores, mean (SD) Beta blockers ACE inhibitors Digoxin Diuretics LVEF, % LVEDD, mm Six minutes-walk test^* TTT Control TTT Control TTT Control TTT Control TTT Control TTT Control TTT Control Bartolucci 2015 10 (83.3) 8 (72.7) NR NR 3 (25) 3 (27.3) 11 (91.6) 10 (90.9) 26.8 ± 4.9 30.3 ± 6.3 NR NR NR NR Bocchi 2010 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 21.8 ± 3.8 30.6 ± 7.3 79 (10) 78 (12) NR NR Frljak 2018 30 (100) 30 (100) 31 (100) 32 (100) 2 (7) 3 (10) 32 (100) 33 (100) 32.2 ± 9.3 31.1 ± 7.8 NR NR NR NR Hamshere 2015 13 14 15 13 6 2 9 8 32.93 ± 16.46 29.75 ± 9.2 NR NR NR NR Hu* 2011 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 466 (402, 495) 448 (383, 497) Matrino 2015 9 (11) 8 (10.2) 53 (64.1) 48 (61.1) 63 (77) 62 (79) 74 (89.7) 69 (88.9) 23.8 ± 7.2 24.7 ± 7.0 NR NR 347.3(146.7) 349.8(139.7) Sant'Anna 2014 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 358.5 (88.69) 353 (86.67) Seth 2010 29 (70) 29 (72) 41 (100) 40 (100) NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Vrtovec 2011 21 (75) 22 (81) NR NR 5 (18) 6 (22) 26 (93) 24 (88) 25.6 ± 5.1 26.7 ± 3.9 69 ± 10 70 ± 7 NR NR Vrtovec 2013 43 (79) 46 (84) 51 (93) 54 (98) 9 (16) 11 (20) 51 (93) 20 (91) 24.3 ± 6.5 25.7 ± 4.1 69 ± 10 70 ± 7 NR NR Xiao 2017 16 (100) 20 (100) 16 (100) 19 (95) 4 (25.0) 8 (40.0) 5 (31.3) 6 (30.0) 33.1 ± 3.9 33.7 ± 4.0 NR NR 355.0 ± 91.2 323.3 ± 89.4 Data are reported as mean ± SD or n (%) unless proved otherwise TTT treatment group, NR not reported ^*Data are reported as median (IQR).

Effects of stem cells on non-ischemic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND AIMS

To assess the impacts of stem cell therapy on clinical outcomes in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). The effect of stem cell therapy on prognosis is unclear and controversial.

METHODS

The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with NICM on a composite outcome of all-cause mortality and heart transplantation, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification, 6-minute walk test (6-MWT) distance and serum brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) level, considering studies published before March 19, 2020.

RESULTS

Twelve trials with 623 subjects met inclusion criteria. Compared with the control group, stem cell therapy improved LVEF (weighted mean difference [WMD], 4.08%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.93-6.23, P = 0.0002) and 6-MWT distance (WMD, 101.49 m, 95% CI, 45.62-157.35, P = 0.0004) and reduced BNP level (-294.94 pg/mL, 95% CI, -383.97 to -205.90, P < 0.00001) and NYHA classification (-0.70, 95% CI, -0.98 to -0.43, P < 0.00001). However, LVEDD showed no significant difference between the two groups (WMD, -0.09 cm, 95% CI, -0.23 to 0.06, P = 0.25). In 10 studies (535 subjects) employing the intracoronary route for cell delivery, mortality and heart transplantation were decreased (risk ratio [RR], 0.73, 95% CI, 0.52-1.00, P = 0.05). Furthermore, in four studies (248 subjects) with peripheral CD34+ cells, either all-cause mortality (RR, 0.44, 95% CI, 0.23-0.86, P = 0.02) or mortality and heart transplantation (RR, 0.45, 95% CI, 0.27-0.77, P = 0.003) improved in the treatment group compared with the control. The trial sequential analysis suggested the information size of LVEF, 6-WMT and BNP has been adequate for evidencing the benefits of stem cells on NICM. However, to determine the potential survival benefit, more clinical data are required to make the statistical significance in meta-analysis more conclusive.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrates that stem cell therapy may improve survival, exercise capacity and cardiac ejection fraction in NICM, which suggests that stem cells are a promising option for NICM treatment.

CD34+ Stem Cells: Promising Roles in Cardiac Repair and Regeneration

Cell therapy has received significant attention as a novel therapeutic approach to restore cardiac function after injury. CD34-positive (CD34⁺) stem cells have been investigated for their ability to promote angiogenesis and contribute to the prevention of remodelling after infarct. However, there are significant differences between murine and human CD34⁺ cells; understanding these differences might benefit the therapeutic use of these cells. Herein we discuss the function of the CD34 cell and highlight the similarities and differences between murine and human CD34 cell function, which might explain some of the differences between the animal and human evolutions. We also summarize the studies that report the application of murine and human CD34⁺ cells in preclinical studies and clinical trials and current limitations with the application of cell therapy for cardiac repair. Finally, to overcome these limitations we discuss the application of novel humanized rodent models that can bridge the gap between preclinical and clinical studies as well as rejuvenation strategies for improving the quality of old CD34⁺ cells for future clinical trials of autologous cell transplantation.

[Cell therapy in the multimodality treatment of a patient with dilated cardiomyopathy. A case report]

We present a 13-years follow-up results in patient with dilated cardiomyopathy. We performed intracoronary infusion of bone marrow mononuclear fraction in patient with 4th heart failure functional class in 2005. We observed an improvement in symptoms (patient had 1st functional class of heart failure) during 10-years follow-up. In 2015 due to clinical worsening we performed 2nd and 3rd bone marrow mononuclear cells infusion with 9-month interval. We observed a signifcant improvement in symptoms, EF and LV sizes. We continue the follow-up.

Regenerative Therapy for Cardiomyopathies

Despite substantial advances in the development of medical and interventional strategies in ischemic and non-ischemic heart diseases, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain the leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Stem cell therapy for heart disease has gained traction over the past two decades and is an emerging option for the treatment of myocardial dysfunction. In this review, we summarize the current literature on different types of stem cells and their potential usage in ischemic and non-ischemic heart diseases. We emphasize the clinical utility of stem cells to improve myocardial structural and function, promote microvascular angiogenesis, and diminish scar size and major adverse cardiovascular events. We also discuss the therapeutic potential of microvesicles, such as exosomes, in the treatment of CVDs, which may open novel avenues for further clinical studies.

Thioredoxin-1 (Trx1) engineered mesenchymal stem cell therapy increased pro-angiogenic factors, reduced fibrosis and improved heart function in the infarcted rat myocardium

INTRODUCTION

Engraftment of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has emerged as a powerful candidate for mediating myocardial repair. In this study, we genetically modified MSCs with an adenovector encoding thioredoxin-1 (Ad.Trx1). Trx1 has been described as a growth regulator, a transcription factor regulator, a cofactor, and a powerful antioxidant. We explored whether engineered MSCs, when transplanted, are capable of improving cardiac function and angiogenesis in a rat model of myocardial infarction (MI).

METHODS

Rat MSCs were cultured and divided into MSC, MSC+Ad.LacZ, and MSC+Ad.Trx1 groups. The cells were assayed for proliferation, and differentiation potential. In addition, rats were divided into control-sham (CS), control-MI (CMI), MSC+Ad.LacZ-MI (MLZMI), and MSC+Ad.Trx1-MI (MTrxMI) groups. MI was induced by left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) ligation, and MSCs preconditioned with either Ad.LacZ or Ad.Trx1 were immediately administered to four sites in the peri-infarct zone.

RESULTS

The MSC+Ad.Trx1 cells increased the proliferation capacity and maintained pluripotency, allowing them to divide into cardiomyocytes, smooth muscle, and endothelial cells. Western blot analysis, 4 days after treatment showed increased vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), and C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4). Also capillary density along with myocardial function as examined by echocardiography was found to be increased. Fibrosis was reduced in the MTrxMI group compared to MLZMI and CMI. Visualization of Connexin-43 by immunohistochemistry confirmed increased intercellular connections in the MTrxMI rats compared to MLZMI.

CONCLUSION

Engineering MSCs to express Trx1 may prove to be a strategic therapeutic modality in the treatment of cardiac failure.

A framework for meta-analysis of veterinary drug pharmacokinetic data using mixed effect modeling

Combining data from available studies is a useful approach to interpret the overwhelming amount of data generated in medical research from multiple studies. Paradoxically, in veterinary medicine, lack of data requires integrating available data to make meaningful population inferences. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling is a useful tool to apply meta-analysis to diverse pharmacokinetic (PK) studies of veterinary drugs. This review provides a summary of the characteristics of PK data of veterinary drugs and how integration of these data may differ from human PK studies. The limits of meta-analysis include the sophistication of data mining, and generation of misleading results caused by biased or poor quality data. The overriding strength of meta-analysis applied to this field is that robust statistical analysis of the diverse sparse data sets inherent to veterinary medicine applications can be accomplished, thereby allowing population inferences to be made.