Shared Decision Making and the Cardiovascular Care of Athletes: Is It Time to Get Back in the Game?

2024 HRS expert consensus statement on arrhythmias in the athlete: Evaluation, treatment, and return to play

Youth and adult participation in sports continues to increase, and athletes may be diagnosed with potentially arrhythmogenic cardiac conditions. This international multidisciplinary document is intended to guide electrophysiologists, sports cardiologists, and associated health care team members in the diagnosis, treatment, and management of arrhythmic conditions in the athlete with the goal of facilitating return to sport and avoiding the harm caused by restriction. Expert, disease-specific risk assessment in the context of athlete symptoms and diagnoses is emphasized throughout the document. After appropriate risk assessment, management of arrhythmias geared toward return to play when possible is addressed. Other topics include shared decision-making and emergency action planning. The goal of this document is to provide evidence-based recommendations impacting all areas in the care of athletes with arrhythmic conditions. Areas in need of further study are also discussed.

New Insights and Recommendations for Athletes With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) has long been considered to be a high-risk cardiac condition for which exercise was thought to increase the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). This was founded in part by initial autopsy studies reporting HCM to be a leading medical cause of SCD among young athletes. Most forms of competitive sport and exercise were therefore thought to increase the risk of SCD to a prohibitive level. Resultant expert consensus guideline recommendations universally restricted athletes with HCM from participation in moderate- to vigourous-intensity sport and exercise in a binary "yes" or "no" clinical decision making process with the goal of reducing the risk of sports-related SCD. HCM is, however, a heterogeneous genetic condition with variable penetrance and risk. The degree to which sports and exercise increases the risk of SCD at an individual patient level continues to be an area of clinical uncertainty. Emerging data and clinical experience from the past several decades have provided important new insights into exercise-related risks and have brought into question the appropriateness of overly restrictive binary clinical decision making for exercise recommendations in HCM. This includes an improved understanding of the overall prevalence of HCM in the general population, improved observational estimates of the risk of SCD related to continued sport and exercise participation, and a general shift toward improved patient-centred approaches to care through shared decision making processes. The rules by which the game is played may be changing for athletes with HCM.

Shared decision-making with athletes: a survey study of healthcare professionals' perspectives

Objectives

Shared decision-making (SDM) is a trending topic in athlete health care; however, little is known about its use in a sports context. This study aimed to measure knowledge and self-perceived practice of SDM among healthcare professionals working with athletes. This study evaluates SDM attitudes and preferences and explores how healthcare professionals perceive the factors influencing SDM.

Methods

A web-based cross-sectional survey with open-ended and closed-ended questions.

Results

Our survey was completed by 131 healthcare professionals. The majority (63.6%) reported to prefer SDM and to be confident in their SDM skills (81.1%). Despite this inclination and confidence, only one in four clinicians reported consistent practice of SDM when feasible. Additionally, most clinicians lacked SDM knowledge. The barriers perceived by healthcare professionals included time constraints (17.6%), limited patient knowledge (17.6%), limited patient motivation (13.5%) and language barriers (16.2%). Importantly, two-thirds of the participants believed that SDM in athlete health care differs from SDM in non-athletes due to the high-pressure environment, the tension between performance and health, and the involvement of multiple stakeholders with potentially conflicting interests.

Conclusions

Although healthcare professionals preferred SDM, they did not fully understand nor routinely practice it. Most healthcare professionals perceive SDM in athlete health care to differ from SDM in the general population. Therefore, to inform the implementation of SDM in athlete health care, future research is crucial to understand better what makes practising SDM unique in this setting.

Shared Decision-Making in Athletes Diagnosed With a Cardiovascular Condition: A Scoping Review

This scoping review summarizes existing approaches, benefits, and barriers to shared decision-making (SDM) in the context of sports cardiology. Among 6,058 records screened, 37 articles were included in this review. Most included articles defined SDM as an open dialogue between the athlete, healthcare team, and other stakeholders. The benefits and risks of management strategies, treatment options, and return-to-play were the focus of this dialogue. Key components of SDM were described through various themes, such as emphasizing patient values, considering nonphysical factors, and informed consent. Benefits of SDM included enhancing patient understanding, implementing a personalized management plan, and considering a holistic approach to care. Barriers to SDM included pressure from institutions, consideration of multiple perspectives in decision-making, and the potential liability of healthcare providers. The use of SDM when discussing management, treatment, and lifestyle modification for athletes diagnosed with a cardiovascular condition is necessary to ensure patient autonomy and engagement.

Implications of the COVID-19 pandemic on athletes, sports events, and mass gathering events: Review and recommendations

Since the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19), which caused several respiratory diseases, was formally declared a global pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) on March 11, 2020, it affected the lifestyle and health of athletes, both directly through cardiorespiratory and other health related effects, and indirectly as the pandemic has forced the suspension, postponement, or cancellation of most professional sporting events around the world. In this review, we explore the journey of athletes throughout the pandemic and during their return to their competitive routine. We also highlight potential pitfalls during the process and summarize the recommendations for the optimal return to sport participation. We further discuss the impact of the pandemic on the psychology of athletes, the variance between the team and individual athletes, and their ability to cope with the changes. Moreover, we specifically reviewed the pandemic impact on younger professional athletes in terms of mental and fitness health. Finally, we shaded light on the various impacts of mass gathering events and recommendations for managing upcoming events.

Management of the master endurance athlete with stable coronary artery disease

Master endurance athletes are individuals > 35 years of age who either train for or participate in competitions. Considering the potential burden of coronary artery disease in this population, clinicians should be aware of the inherent dangers of exercise. A tailored approach with shared decision-making, balancing risks and benefits of exercise, is recommended to ensure safe exercise in these individuals.

Exercise in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: restrict or rethink

The detailed physiological consequences of aerobic training, in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), are not well understood. In athletes and nonathletes with HCM, there are two hypothetical concerns with respect to exercise: exercise-related worsening of the phenotype (e.g., promoting hypertrophy and fibrosis) and/or triggering of arrhythmia. The former concern is unproven and animal studies suggest an opposite effect, where exercise has been shown to be protective. The main reason for exercise restriction in HCM is fear of exercise-induced arrhythmia. Although the safety of sports in HCM has been reviewed, even more recent data suggest a substantially lower risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD) in HCM than previously thought, and there is an ongoing debate about restrictions of exercise imposed on individuals with HCM. This review outlines the pathophysiology of HCM, the impact of acute and chronic exercise (and variations of exercise intensity, modality, and athletic phenotype) in HCM including changes in autonomic function, blood pressure, cardiac dimensions and function, and cardiac output, and the underlying mechanisms that may trigger exercise-induced lethal arrhythmias. It provides a critical evaluation of the evidence regarding risk of SCD in athletes and the potential benefits of targeted exercise prescription in adults with HCM. Finally, it provides considerations for personalized recommendations for sports participation based on the available data.

COVID-19-Myocarditis and Return to Play: Reflections and Recommendations From a Canadian Working Group

The COVID-19–related pandemic has resulted in profound health, financial, and societal impacts. Organized sporting events, from recreational to the Olympic level, have been cancelled to both mitigate the spread of COVID-19 and protect athletes and highly active individuals from potential acute and long-term infection-associated harms. COVID-19 infection has been associated with increased cardiac morbidity and mortality. Myocarditis and late gadolinium enhancement as a result of COVID-19 infection have been confirmed. Correspondingly, myocarditis has been implicated in sudden cardiac death of athletes. A pragmatic approach is required to guide those who care for athletes and highly active persons with COVID-19 infection. Members of the Community and Athletic Cardiovascular Health Network (CATCHNet) and the writing group for the Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Joint Position Statement on the Cardiovascular Screening of Competitive Athletes recommend that highly active persons with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection refrain from exercise for 7 days after resolution of viral symptoms before gradual return to exercise. We do not recommend routine troponin testing, resting 12-lead electrocardiography, echocardiography, or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging before return to play. However, medical assessment including history and physical examination with consideration of resting electrocardiography and troponin can be considered in the athlete manifesting new active cardiac symptoms or a marked reduction in fitness. If concerning abnormalities are encountered at the initial medical assessment, then referral to a cardiologist who cares for athletes is recommended.

Shock to the Heart: Psychosocial Implications and Applications of Sudden Cardiac Death in the Young

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although rare, sudden cardiac death (SCD) in the young is a tragic event, having a dramatic impact upon all involved. The psychosocial burden associated with SCD can leave friends, families, and entire communities bereft. With only limited evidence to describe the volatile emotional reactions associated with a young SCD, there is an urgent need for care providers to better understand the psychological complexities and impacts faced by both at-risk individuals and those directly affected by these tragic events.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current knowledge of the psychosocial implications associated with SCD in the young has recently generated interest in the cardiovascular community, with the goal of addressing prevention strategies (screening), family bereavement, and the psychological impact of at-risk or surviving individuals. With the emergence of novel strategies aimed at reducing the public health impact of SCD in the young, further discussion regarding the psychosocial impact of SCD, encompassing prevention, survivorship, and the downstream communal effects of a young death is required. Support systems and intervention could assist in the management of the associated psychosocial burden, yet there is a lack of clinical guidelines to direct this form of care. There is an important need for multidisciplinary collaboration across subspecialties to provide support to grieving individuals and manage patient well-being throughout the screening process for SCD. This collaborative approach requires the integration of cardiovascular and psychological expertise where relevant.