Prognostic Value of Delirium in Patients With Acute Heart Failure in the Intensive Care Unit

Association of Delirium with Long-Term Mortality in Critically Ill Patients with COPD Who Survived to Discharge: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Critically ill patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) face significant mortality after hospital discharge. Delirium is common in patients with COPD, but its impact on long-term mortality in critically ill COPD patients who survive to discharge remains uncertain.

METHODS

Critically ill patients with COPD who survived to discharge were selected from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database. Delirium was assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Unit. The primary outcome was 365- and 180-day mortality after discharge. The secondary outcomes included 90- and 30-day mortality following discharge, length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays, and nursing care needs after hospital discharge.

RESULTS

Of the 2621 survivors of critically ill COPD patients, 982 had suffered delirium during their ICU stay and 709 died within 365 days after hospital discharge. Delirium was significantly associated with 365-day mortality after hospital discharge (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.47). The results were consistent for 180-, 90-, and 30-day post-discharge mortality (adjusted HR [95% CI]: 1.35 [1.09-1.66], 1.48 [1.16-1.89], and 1.68 [1.21-2.32], respectively). Additionally, patients with delirium had longer ICU and hospital stay (adjusted β 2.75; 95% CI 2.35-3.16 and 4.25; 95% CI 3.51-4.98, respectively) and increased nursing care needs after hospital discharge (adjusted odds ratio, 1.56; 95% CI 1.13-2.14).

CONCLUSION

ICU delirium was an independent risk factor for both long-term and short-term mortality in critically ill patients with COPD who survived to discharge.

Prolonged delirium during hospitalization is associated with worse long-term and short-term outcomes in patients with acute heart failure

BACKGROUND

The association between prolonged delirium during hospitalization and long-term prognosis in patients with acute heart failure (AHF) admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) has not been fully elucidated.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective registry study of patients with AHF admitted to the CICU at 2 hospitals from 2013 to 2021. We divided study patients into 3 groups according to the presence or absence of delirium and prolonged delirium as follows: no delirium, resolved delirium, or prolonged delirium. Main outcomes were in-hospital mortality and 3-year mortality after discharge.

RESULTS

A total of 1555 patients with AHF (median age, 80 years) were included in the analysis. Of these, 406 patients (26.1%) developed delirium. We divided patients with delirium into 2 groups: the resolved delirium group (n = 201) or the prolonged delirium group (n = 205). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models for long-term prognosis demonstrated that the prolonged delirium group had a higher incidence of all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR], 1.52; 95% CI, 1.08 to 2.14) and non-cardiovascular death (HR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.21 to 2.78) than the resolved delirium group. Regarding in-hospital outcomes, multivariate logistic regression modeling showed that prolonged delirium is associated with all-cause death (odds ratio [OR], 9.55; 95% confidential interval [CI], 2.99 to 30.53) and cardiovascular death (OR, 13.02; 95% CI, 2.86 to 59.27) compared with resolved delirium.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged delirium is associated with worse long-term and short-term outcomes than resolved delirium in patients with AHF.

Developing Multidisciplinary Management of Heart Failure in the Super-Aging Society of Japan

The Japanese population is rapidly aging because of its long life expectancy and low birth rate; additionally, the number of patients with heart failure (HF) is increasing to the extent that HF is now considered a pandemic. According to a recent HF registry study, Japanese patients with HF have both medical and care-related problems. Although hospitalization is used to provide medical services, and institutionalization is used to provide care for frail older adults, it can be difficult to distinguish between them. In this context, multidisciplinary management of HF has become increasingly important in preventing hospital readmissions and maintaining a patient's quality of life. Academia has promoted an increase in the number of certified HF nurses and educators. Researchers have issued numerous guidelines or statements on topics such as cardiac rehabilitation, nutrition, and palliative care, in addition to the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic HF. Moreover, the Japanese government has created incentives through various medical and long-term care systems adjustments to increase collaboration between these two fields. This review summarizes current epidemiological registries that focus not only on medical but also care-related problems and the 10 years of multidisciplinary management experience in Japanese medical and long-term care systems.

Prognostic significance of delirium in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Delirium is a common symptom of heart failure (HF) and is associated with increased mortality, prolonged hospital stays, and heightened medical costs. The impact of delirium on the prognosis of HF patients is currently controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic significance of delirium in HF.

Methods

Relevant articles were systematically searched in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase based on the PRISMA guidelines. Studies that reported mortality and hospitalization-related outcomes in HF patients with or without delirium using raw or adjusted hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratio (OD) were included. Meta-analysis was then performed to evaluate the effect of delirium in HF patients. Outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality and events of the hospitalization.

Results

Of the 1,501 studies identified, 7 eligible studies involving 12,830,390 HF patients (6,322,846 males and 6,507,544 females) were included in the meta-analysis. There were 91,640 patients with delirium (0.71%) and 12,738,750 patients without delirium (99.28%). HF patients with delirium had higher OR for in-hospital mortality (1.95, 95% CI = 1.30-2.91, P = 0.135), higher pooled HR for 90-day mortality (2.64, 95% CI = 1.06-1.56, P = 0.215), higher pooled HR for 1-year mortality (2.08, 95% CI = 1.34-3.22, P = 0.004), and higher pooled HR for 30-day readmission rate (4.15, 95% CI = 2.85-6.04, P = 0.831) than those without delirium.

Conclusion

Current evidence suggests that combined delirium increases the risk of HF-related mortality and hospitalization-related outcomes in patients with HF. However, more research is needed to assess the impact of delirium on the prognosis of HF patients.

Association between delirium and statin use in patients with congestive heart failure: a retrospective propensity score-weighted analysis

Background

The relationship between statin use and delirium remains controversial; therefore, we aimed to study the association between statin exposure and delirium and in-hospital mortality in patients with congestive heart failure.

Methods

In this retrospective study, patients with congestive heart failure were identified from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care database. The primary exposure variable was statin use 3 days after admission to the intensive care unit, and the primary outcome measure was the presence of delirium. The secondary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality. Since the cohort study was retrospective, we used inverse probability weighting derived from the propensity score to balance various variables.

Results

Of 8,396 patients, 5,446 (65%) were statin users. Before matching, the prevalence of delirium was 12.5% and that of in-hospital mortality was 11.8% in patients with congestive heart failure. Statin use was significantly negatively correlated with delirium, with an odds ratio of 0.76 (95% confidence interval: [0.66-0.87]; P < 0.001) in the inverse probability weighting cohort and in-hospital mortality of 0.66 (95% confidence interval: [0.58-0.75]; P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Statins administered in the intensive care unit can significantly reduce the incidence of delirium and in-hospital mortality in patients with congestive heart failure.

Association of dementia with in-hospital outcomes in primary heart failure and acute myocardial infarction hospitalizations

BACKGROUND

Dementia and cardiovascular diseases contribute to a significant disability and healthcare utilization in the elderly.

OBJECTIVE

The in-hospital treatment patterns and outcomes of heart failure (HF) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are not well-studied in this population.

METHODS

We used the National Inpatient Sample database to identify AMI and HF hospitalizations in adults ≥65 years between 2016 and 2018.

RESULTS

A total of 2,466,369 HF hospitalizations (277,900 with dementia [11.3%]) and 1,094,155 AMI hospitalizations (100,365 with dementia [9.2%]) were identified. Patients with dementia were older (mean age 83.8 vs 78.6 years for HF, and 83.0 vs 75.8 years for AMI) with female predominance (59.0% for HF and 56.0% for AMI) than those without dementia. In adjusted analysis, patients with dementia had higher in-hospital mortality (HF 4.7% vs 3.1%, aOR 1.33 [1.27-1.39] and AMI 9.9% vs 5.9%, aOR 1.23 [1.17-1.30]), p < 0.001) and lower mechanical circulatory support utilization. Patients with AMI and dementia were less likely to receive revascularization (including percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, and thrombolysis), vasopressors, and invasive mechanical ventilation. They had a longer mean length of stay (LOS) (5.5 vs 5.3 days for HF and 5.1 vs 4.8 days for AMI, p < 0.001 for both), a lower inflation-adjusted cost of care for AMI ($15,486 vs $23,215, p < 0.001), and higher rates of transfer to rehabilitation facilities.

CONCLUSION

Patients with dementia admitted for HF or AMI had higher in-hospital mortality, a longer LOS, and were less likely to receive aggressive revascularization interventions after AMI.

Construction and Application of a Model for Predicting the Risk of Delirium in Postoperative Patients With Type a Aortic Dissection

Background: Postoperative delirium (POD), an alteration in a patient's consciousness pattern, can affect the treatment and prognosis of a disease.

Objective: To construct a prediction model for delirium in patients with type A aortic dissection after surgery and to validate its effectiveness.

Methods: A retrospective cohort design was used to study 438 patients undergoing surgical treatment for type A aortic dissection from April 2019 to June 2020 in tertiary care hospitals. POD (n = 78) and non-delirium groups (n = 360) were compared and analyzed for each index in the perioperative period. A prediction model was established using multifactorial logistic regression, and 30 patients' perioperative data were collected for model validation.

Results: Eight predictors were included in this study: smoking, diabetes, previous cardiovascular surgery, ejection fraction (EF), time to aortic block, acute kidney injury, low cardiac output syndrome, and pulmonary complications. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the constructed prediction model was 0.98 ± 0.005, and the Youden index was 0.91. The validation results showed 97% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 93% accuracy. The expression of the model was Z = Smoking assignment^* – 2.807 – 6.009^*Diabetes assignment – 2.994^*Previous cardiovascular surgery assignment – 0.129^*Ejection fraction assignment + 0.071^*Brain perfusion time assignment – 2.583^*Acute kidney injury assignment – 2.916^*Low cardiac output syndrome assignment – 3.461^*Pulmonary related complications assignment + 20.576.

Conclusion: The construction of an effective prediction model for the risk of delirium in patients after type A aortic stratification can help identify patients at high risk of POD early. It also provides a reference for healthcare professionals in the prevention and care of these patients.

Evidence-Based Management of Acute Heart Failure

Acute heart failure (AHF) is a complex, heterogeneous, clinical syndrome with high morbidity and mortality, incurring significant health care costs. Patients transition from home to the emergency department, the hospital, and home again and require decisions surrounding diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis at each step of the way. The purpose of this review is to examine the epidemiology, etiology, and classifications of AHF and specifically focus on practical information relevant to the clinician. We examine the mechanisms of decompensation relevant to clinical presentations-including precipitating factors, neuroendocrine interactions, and inflammation-along with how consideration of these factors may help select therapies for an individual patient. The prevalence and significance of end-organ manifestations such as renal, gastrointestinal, respiratory, and neurologic manifestations are discussed. We also highlight how the development of renal dysfunction relates to the choice of a variety of diuretics that may be useful in specific circumstances and review guideline-directed medical therapy. We discuss the practical use (and pitfalls) of a variety of evidence-based clinical scoring criteria available to risk stratify patients with AHF. Finally, evidence-based management of AHF is discussed, including both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies, including the lack of evidence for using old and new vasodilators and the recent evidence regarding initiation of newer therapies in hospital. Overall, we suggest that clinicians consider implementing the newer data in AHF and subject existing practice patterns and treatments to the same rigour as new therapies.