Social Deprivation and Peripheral Artery Disease

Geographic Variation in First Lower Extremity Amputations Related to Diabetes and/or Peripheral Arterial Disease

BACKGROUND

To assess trends of first cases of lower extremity amputation (LEA) related to diabetes and/or peripheral arterial disease (PAD), according to areas of residency and neighbourhood material and social deprivation quintiles, in the province of Quebec, Canada.

METHODS

Using the Quebec Integrated Chronic Disease Surveillance System, we calculated crude and age-standardized annual incidence rates of first LEA (total, minor, and major) among adults 40 years of age and older with diabetes and/or PAD in fiscal years 2006 and 2019. Area of residency was compiled in 3 categories: (1) Montreal and other census metropolitan areas; (2) midsize agglomerations (10,000-100,000 inhabitants); and (3) small towns and rural areas (< 10,000 inhabitants). We also stratified according to neighbourhood material and social deprivation quintiles. One-year and 5-year all-cause mortality after first LEA were compared according to area of residency.

RESULTS

Among the 10,275 individuals who had a first LEA, age-standardized LEA rates remained stable between 2006 and 2019, whereas major LEA rates declined in all geographical areas and minor LEA rates increased (31.6%) in small towns and rural areas. In 2019, age-standardized LEA rates were higher in midsize agglomerations and small towns and rural areas compared with census metropolitan areas. Age-standardized LEA rates in 2019 were higher among the most deprived quintile compared with the most privileged quintile for material and social deprivation. No difference was observed in mortality after first LEA according to area of residency.

CONCLUSIONS

There are health disparities in the burden of diabetes and PAD related to first LEA in the province of Quebec. To improve preventive care and reduce the burden of LEA, targeted actions should be taken among the most deprived groups and rural settings.

Using Separate Single-Outcome Risk Presentations Instead of Integrated Multioutcome Formats Improves Comprehension in Discrete Choice Experiments

INTRODUCTION

Despite decades of research on risk-communication approaches, questions remain about the optimal methods for conveying risks for different outcomes across multiple time points, which can be necessary in applications such as discrete choice experiments (DCEs). We sought to compare the effects of 3 design factors: 1) separated versus integrated presentations of the risks for different outcomes, 2) use or omission of icon arrays, and 3) vertical versus horizontal orientation of the time dimension.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized study among a demographically diverse sample of 2,242 US adults recruited from an online panel (mean age 59.8 y, s = 10.4 y; 21.9% African American) that compared risk-communication approaches that varied in the 3 factors noted above. The primary outcome was the number of correct responses to 12 multiple-choice questions asking survey respondents to identify specific numbers, contrast options to recognize dominance (larger v. smaller risks), and compute differences. We used linear regression to test the effects of the 3 design factors, controlling for health literacy, graph literacy, and numeracy. We also measured choice consistency in a subsequent DCE choice module.

RESULTS

Mean comprehension varied significantly across versions (P < 0.001), with higher comprehension in the 3 versions that provided separated risk information for each risk. In the multivariable regression, separated risk presentation was associated with 0.58 more correct responses (P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval: 0.39, 0.77) compared with integrated risk information. Neither providing icon arrays nor using vertical versus horizontal time formats affected comprehension rates, although participant understanding did correlate with DCE choice consistency.

CONCLUSIONS

In presentations of multiple risks over multiple time points, presenting risk information separately for each health outcome appears to increase understanding.

HIGHLIGHTS

When conveying information about risks of different outcomes at multiple time points, separate presentations of single-outcome risks resulted in higher comprehension than presentations that combined risk information for different outcomes.We also observed benefits of presenting single-outcome risks separately among respondents with lower numeracy and graph literacy.Study participants who scored higher on risk understanding were more internally consistent in their responses to a discrete choice experiment.

Increasing Awareness for Peripheral Artery Disease through the Identification of Novel Biomarkers

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a chronic atherosclerotic disorder that involves the lower extremity arteries, manifesting in claudication, rest pain, and tissue loss [...].

The importance of socio-economic determinants of health in the care of patients with peripheral artery disease: A narrative review from VAS

Socio-economic determinants of health (SDoH) include various nonmedical factors in the socio-economic sphere with a potentially significant impact on health outcomes. Their effects manifest through several mediators/moderators (behavioral characteristics, physical environment, psychosocial circumstances, access to care, and biological factors). Various critical covariates (age, gender/sex, race/ethnicity, culture/acculturation, and disability status) also interact. Analyzing the effects of these factors is challenging due to their enormous complexity. Although the significance of SDoH for cardiovascular diseases is well documented, research regarding their impact on peripheral artery disease (PAD) occurrence and care is less well documented. This narrative review explores to what extent SDoH are multifaceted in PAD and how they are associated with its occurrence and care. Additionally, methodological issues that may hamper this effort are addressed. Finally, the most important question, whether this association may contribute to reasonable interventions aimed at SDoH, is analyzed. This endeavor requires attention to the social context, a whole systems approach, multilevel-thinking, and a broader alliance that reaches out to more stakeholders outside the medical sphere. More research is needed to justify the power in this concept to improve PAD-related outcomes like lower extremity amputations. At the present time, some evidence, reasonable consideration, and intuitive reasoning support the implementation of various interventions in SDoH in this field.

Circulating proteins and peripheral artery disease risk: observational and Mendelian randomization analyses

Aims

We conducted observational and Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses to explore the associations between blood proteins and risk of peripheral artery disease (PAD).

Methods and results

The observational cohort analyses included data on 257 proteins estimated in fasting blood samples from 12 136 Swedish adults aged 55-94 years who were followed up for incident PAD via the Swedish Patient Register. Mendelian randomization analyses were undertaken using cis-genetic variants strongly associated with the proteins as instrumental variables and genetic association summary statistic data for PAD from the FinnGen study (11 924 cases and 288 638 controls) and the Million Veteran Program (31 307 cases and 211 753 controls). The observational analysis, including 86 individuals diagnosed with incident PAD during a median follow-up of 6.6-year, identified 13 proteins [trefoil factor two, matrix metalloproteinase-12 (MMP-12), growth differentiation factor 15, V-set and immunoglobulin domain-containing protein two, N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide, renin, natriuretic peptides B, phosphoprotein associated with glycosphingolipid-enriched microdomains one, C-C motif chemokine 15, P-selectin, urokinase plasminogen activator surface receptor, angiopoietin-2, and C-type lectin domain family five member A] associated with the risk of PAD after multiple testing correction. Mendelian randomization analysis found associations of T-cell surface glycoprotein CD4, MMP-12, secretoglobin family 3A member 2, and ADM with PAD risk. The observational and MR associations for T-cell surface glycoprotein CD4 and MMP-12 were in opposite directions.

Conclusion

This study identified many circulating proteins in relation to the development of incident PAD. Future studies are needed to verify our findings and assess the predictive and therapeutic values of these proteins in PAD.