High-dose thiamine supplementation in older patients with heart failure: a pilot randomized controlled crossover trial (THIAMINE-HF)

Role of Thiamine Supplementation in the Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Chronic heart failure (CHF) has always posed a significant threat to human survival and health. The efficacy of thiamine supplementation in CHF patients remains uncertain.

HYPOTHESIS

Receiving supplementary thiamine may not confer benefits to patients with CHF.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted across the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Web of Science databases up until May 2023 to identify articles investigating the effects of thiamine supplementation in CHF patients. Predefined criteria were utilized for selecting data on study characteristics and results.

RESULTS

Seven randomized, double-blind, controlled trials (five parallel trials and two crossover trials) involving a total of 274 patients were enrolled. The results of the meta-analysis pooling these studies did not reveal any significant effect of thiamine treatment compared with placebo on left ventricular ejection fraction (WMD = 1.653%, 95% CI:  -1.098 to 4.405, p = 0.239, I2 = 61.8%), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (WMD = -6.831 mL, 95% CI:  -26.367 to 12.704, p = 0.493, I2 = 0.0%), 6-min walking test (WMD = 16.526 m, 95% CI:  -36.582 to 69.634, p = 0.542, I2 = 66.3%), N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (WMD = 258.150 pg/mL, 95% CI:  -236.406 to 752.707, p = 0.306, I2 = 21.6%), or New York Heart Association class (WMD = -0.223, 95% CI:  -0.781 to 0.335, p = 0.434, I2 = 87.1%). However, it effectively improved the status of thiamine deficiency (TD).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis indicates that thiamine supplementation does not have a direct therapeutic effect on CHF, except for correcting TD.

Long-Term Maintenance of Normal Serum Vitamin B1 Levels Is Associated with Better Outcomes in Patients with Heart Failure

Deficiency of vitamin B1 (VB1), an essential micronutrient, causes heart failure (HF). A recent randomized controlled trial failed to show any improvement in HF prognosis after short-term VB1 supplementation. In the current study, we investigated the efficacy of long-term maintenance of normal blood VB1 levels in preventing adverse outcomes in patients with HF.This study included 88 consecutive patients with HF who received guideline-directed medical therapy at Arida Municipal Hospital. The patients were divided into 3 groups: a control group with normal VB1 levels and no VB1 supplementation (normal group, n = 25), and those presenting with VB1 deficiency, who either required short-term VB1 supplementation (short-term supplementation group, n = 25), or long-term maintenance of normal blood VB1 levels (long-term maintenance group, n = 38). The time to the first appearance of composite outcomes, including cardiovascular death and hospitalization for HF, was compared between the 3 groups.VB1 deficiency was observed in 63 (72%) patients. The Kaplan-Meier curve showed that the long-term maintenance group had better outcomes than the other 2 groups. In the multivariate analysis, long-term maintenance of normal blood VB1 levels and age were independent predictors of composite outcomes.VB1 deficiency is frequently observed, and the long-term maintenance of normal blood VB1 levels may result in better outcomes in patients with HF. Our results suggest that the detection of VB1 deficiency and long-term restoration of VB1 levels may be part of the overall therapeutic strategy for HF.

Does thiamine supplementation affect heart failure? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials

BACKGROUND

Heart failure is a pathophysiological condition where decreased cardiac output is observed subsequent to any structural deformity or cessation of normal function. Thiamine deficiency is one of the risk factors responsible for causing HF; other risk factors include hypertension, smoking, and obesity.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis of RCTs to scrutinize whether the heart failure patients would benefit from thiamine supplementation or not when compared to placebo.

METHODS

We selected only those double-arm randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which included participants presenting with symptomatic heart failure. We excluded all the articles published in languages other than English Language. Furthermore, all the studies other than RCTs were also omitted. Articles yielded from the electronic search were exported to EndNote Reference Library software to remove any duplicates. Analyses were done using the Review manager 5.4 tool. Mean values and standard deviations were retrieved for the continuous outcomes given as raw data.

RESULTS

The 6 RCTs selected for the statistical analysis consisted of 298 participants (158 in the intervention group, 140 in the placebo group). The outcomes resulted to be non-significant with LVEF p-value= 0.08, NT-pro BNP p-value= 0.94, LVEDV p-value= 0.53, 6MWT p-value=0.59, mortality p-value= 0.61, hospitalization p-value= 0.53 and dyspnea p-value= 0.77. Heart rate is the only significant outcome with a p-value=0.04.

CONCLUSION

To conclude, except for heart rate, thiamine supplementation had no effect on the outcomes of heart failure patients.

The effects of thiamine supplementation on patients with heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Micronutrients can benefit patients with heart failure (HF). Thiamine is a critical vitamin, while the impact of thiamine supplementation on patients with HF remains unclear. Systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the effects of thiamine supplementation on clinical outcomes in patients with HF.

METHODS

Databases including Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and CNKI were searched from inception to June 29th 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing thiamine supplementation with placebo were included. Meta-analysis was conducted with the software Review Manager 5.4. The quality assessment was performed according to Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0.

RESULTS

Eight studies including 384 patients were included in this review. The results of overall systematic review showed no benefit of thiamine supplementation in HF patients. Compared with the control group, the experimental group had no statistically significant improvements in LVEF (Mean Difference, - 0.19; 95 % CI, - 2.78 to 0.96; I² = 49 %; P = 0.10) in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Other outcomes including NYHA class, BNP or NT-proBNP, thiamine status, symptom changes, and quality of life were not improved by thiamine supplementation in CHF patients. Similarly, no improvements in clinical outcomes were found in patients with acute heart failure (AHF) in the studies included.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis found no evidence to support the effects of thiamine supplementation in patients with HF, though thiamine supplementation is promising in improving cardiac functions, thiamine status and relieving HF-related symptoms. More well-designed RCTs with large sample sizes are required.