A sixteen year survey of Canadian contact lens prescribing

Profile of contact lens prescribing in GCC countries

PURPOSE

This study aimed to report the pattern of contact lens prescribing from the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries.

METHODS

Optometrists in the GCC region were contacted to participate in a web-based survey hosted on Qualtrics XM (Provo, Utah, USA). The survey methodology was adapted from the International Contact Lens Prescribing Consortium, and participants were asked to report their last five lens fits. It collected information on practitioner demographics (age, gender, nationality, qualification, country of practice, and number of years of experience), CL user demographics (age and gender) and on lens specific details such as lens type, lens design, lens material, replacement plan, and modality of lens wear. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse and report the data.

RESULTS

This study reports 739 contact lens fits by 174 practitioners from six GCC countries. The average age of the patients was 29.72 ± 9.07 (Mean ± SD) years and 64 % of them were females. The majority (80.2 %) were fitted with soft contact lenses, with 59 % preferring silicone hydrogels, 20 % wearing them for cosmetic purposes and nearly half of them disposed of their lenses daily (55 %). Among the RGP lenses, 41 % were scleral lenses. This survey demonstrated a greater proportion of new lens fits (55 % vs. 37 %), disposable hydrogel lens use (21 % vs. 13 %), and a preference for cosmetic contact lenses (20 % vs. 4 %) compared to the international data.

CONCLUSION

The pattern of CL prescriptions in the GCC region closely resembled the global trend. The survey observed a higher preference towards frequent replacement soft lenses, a greater proportion of silicone hydrogel lenses, a higher percentage of rigid lens fits, a greater affinity for cosmetic contact lenses, and a higher percentage of new fits. These trends suggest that contact lens prescription habits in the region are likely to continue evolving in the future.

Current status of contact lenses usage in Korea: A population-based cohort study 2021

PURPOSE

To investigate trends in contact lens usage in a nationally representative sample of the Korean population in 2021.

METHODS

For this retrospective study, we analyzed data of 3,601 Korean participants aged 10-59 years, from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES 2021 version), who underwent eye examination, of whom 1,136 individuals (274 men and 862 women) were contact lens users. The demographic trend among Korean contact lens wearers was examined using statistical analyses to investigate the changes in their contact lens-wearing experience, duration of lens use, type of lens used, location of purchase, presence of an Eye Care Practitioner(ECP)'s prescription, lens-related ophthalmic complications, and type of lenses worn at the time of complications, according to sex. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine the association of each variable with the rate of complications and use of soft lenses.

RESULTS

The average age of the contact lens users was 33.42±0.33 years, with 70.36% (weighted percentage) of users being women who used contact lenses for significantly longer periods than men (p<0.001). Additionally, only wearing of cosmetic lenses was significantly correlated with the occurrence of complications (p = 0.006), and 6.76% of users purchased lenses without a prescription. Multivariate analysis among the contact lens users revealed a significant relationship between the complication rate and female sex (p = 0.002), pre-existing eye disease diagnosed by ECPs (p = 0.0288), and duration of contact lens use (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

We identified sex differences in contact lens usage trends in Korea. The main changes observed were an increase in middle-aged lens users and a decrease in female users compared to that in the early 2000s. In addition, contact lens complications were significantly associated with sex and pre-existing eye disease. Therefore, those wearing contact lenses for extended periods should exercise caution and consult eye care specialists in the presence of any symptoms.

Polyhexanide based contact lens storage fluids frequently exhibit insufficient antifungal activity against Fusarium species

PURPOSE

Fusarium keratitis is a severe infection of the anterior eye, frequently leading to keratoplasty or surgical removal of the affected eye. A major risk factor for infection is the use of contact lenses. Inadequate hygiene precautions and mold-growth permissive storage fluids are important risk factors for fungal keratitis. The aim of this study was to comparatively analyze contact lens storage fluids disinfection efficacy against Fusarium species.

METHODS

Eleven commercially available storage fluids were tested. The storage fluids were classified according to their active ingredients myristamidopropyldimethylamine (Aldox), polyhexanide and hydrogen peroxide. Efficacy was tested against isolates belonging to the Fusarium solani and Fusarium oxysporum species complexes as the most common agents of mould keratitis. Tests were carried out based on DIN EN ISO 14729.

RESULTS

All Aldox and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) based fluids were effective against Fusarium spp., while the majority of polyhexanide based storage fluids showed only limited or no antifungal effects. Efficacy of polyhexanide could be restored by the addition of the pH-regulating agent tromethamine - an additive component in one commercially available product.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, the use of Aldox- or hydrogen peroxide-based storage fluids may reduce the risk of Fusarium keratitis, while polyhexanide-based agents largely lack efficacy against Fusarium.

Multifocal versus modified monovision corrections: A non-dispensing comparison of visual assessment in presbyopic neophytes

Purpose

To compare the visual performance of two simultaneous-vision soft multifocal contact lenses and to compare multifocal contact lens and its modified monovision counterpart in presbyopic neophytes.

Methods

A double-masked, prospective, comparative study was conducted on 19 participants fitted with soft PureVision2 multifocal (PVMF) and clariti multifocal (CMF) lenses in random order. High- and low-contrast distance visual acuity, near visual acuity, stereopsis, contrast sensitivity, and glare acuity were measured. The measurements were conducted using multifocal and modified monovision design with one brand and then repeated with another brand of lens.

Results

High-contrast distance visual acuity showed a significant difference between CMF (0.00 [-0.10-0.04]) and PureVision2 modified monovision (PVMMV; -0.10 [-0.14-0.00]) correction (P = 0.003) and also between CMF and clariti modified monovision (CMMV; -0.10 [-0.20-0.00]) correction (P = 0.002). Both modified monovision lenses outperformed CMF. The current study did not show any statistically significant difference between contact lens corrections for low-contrast visual acuity, near visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity (P > 0.01). Stereopsis at near distance was significantly lower with both modified monovision (PVMMV: 70 [50-85]; P = 0.007, CMMV: 70 [70-100]; P = 0.006) and with CMF (50 [40-70]; P = 0.005) when compared to spectacles (50 [30-70]). Glare acuity was significantly lower with multifocal (PVMF: 0.46 [0.40-0.50]; P = 0.001, CMF: 0.40 [0.40-0.46]; P = 0.007) compared with spectacles (0.40 [0.30-0.40]), but no significant difference was noted between the multifocal contact lenses (P = 0.033).

Conclusion

Modified monovision provided superior high-contrast vision compared to multifocal correction. Multifocal corrections performed better for stereopsis when compared to modified monovision. In parameters like low-contrast visual acuity, near acuity, and contrast sensitivity, both the corrections performed similarly. Both multifocal designs showed comparable visual performances.

Opportunities and threats to contact lens practice in Spain

OBJECTIVE

An international survey evaluated the opportunities and threats related to contact lens practice reported by eye care professionals worldwide. This study reports on the results specifically found in Spain and how these compare with those from other regions of the world.

METHODS

A questionnaire was distributed to eye care practitioners around the world through professional associations. The questionnaire consisted of 9, 5 and 12 questions about opportunities, interventions, and potential threats related to contact lens practice, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 2,408 responses were obtained from practitioners worldwide, of which 436 responses were obtained from Spanish practitioners. Spain was found among the regions with the highest perception of opportunities (median: 6.5/10) along with Australasia, North America, Europe, and South America. Spanish (median: 7.3/10), along with South American practitioners, also reported the highest perception of threats. Continuously updating of knowledge/skills, recommending contact lens wearing options to potential patients, creating an efficient recall system for follow-up examinations and being competent in managing contact lens-related complications were reported as important interventions for contact lens practice growth by Spanish eye care practitioners.

CONCLUSIONS

Spain is one of the regions in the world with the highest perception of both opportunities and threats regarding future contact lens practice. As such, Spanish practitioners consider it important to continuously update knowledge/skills and to recommend and educate patients on the benefits of contact lens wear. Online sales were found to be one of the most important concerns reported by both Spanish and eye care practitioners worldwide.

Wearer Experience and Eye Care Professional Acceptance with a 1 Day Multifocal Contact Lens

Purpose

A large observational survey was undertaken to determine eye care professional (ECP) and patient experience of stenfilcon A multifocal soft contact lens (MyDay multifocal) when prescribed in a real-world setting.

Methods

A total of 196 ECPs from eleven countries fit up to ten presbyopes with stenfilcon A multifocal. Data were collected on fit success at the initial visit, patient satisfaction with comfort, vision at distance, intermediate, and near, overall vision, overall satisfaction, and handling at the initial and follow-up visits after 1-2 weeks of wear. ECPs completed questionnaires on multifocal fitting experience and expectations before and after the fitting period.

Results

A total of 196 pre-fitting and 141 post-fitting ECP surveys were collected. A total of 1505 initial fits (mean age 53.4, range 38 to 81 years, 73% female, 27% neophytes) and 1440 follow-up visits were completed. The mean distance vision contact lens prescription was -1.32DS (range -12.00DS to +8.00DS) with Add powers: Low 56%, Medium 24%, and High 21%. At the follow-up visit 77% (n=1108) of trials were successful. Mean patient satisfaction ratings (1-10 scale, where 1 is not at all satisfied, and 10 extremely satisfied) at the initial visit were higher than eight out of ten for comfort, vision, and overall satisfaction, and were not significantly different after 1-2 weeks of wear. Stenfilcon A multifocal was preferred by 66% of patients over their habitual correction. In most cases mean satisfaction scores and the proportion of patients highly satisfied were not significantly different between myopes and hyperopes, across Add range, between new and habitual wearers, and wearers of frequently replaced and 1 day contact lenses.

Conclusion

ECPs in real-world clinical settings found stenfilcon A multifocal contact lenses easy to fit to a wide range of patients, with a high fit success rate and high levels of patient satisfaction for overall comfort, vision, satisfaction, and handling.

Addressing common myths and misconceptions in soft contact lens practice

Advances in contact lens technology over the past 50 years since the commercialisation of the first soft lenses in 1971 have been incredible, with significant changes in contact lens materials, frequency of replacement, care systems and lens designs occurring. However, despite the widespread availability of contact lenses, penetration rates for those who need vision correction remain in the low single digits and many practitioners seem to hold on to concepts around the potential value of contact lenses that appear based in the dim and distant past and are certainly no longer valid today. This review addresses 10 common 'myths and misconceptions' around soft contact lenses using an evidence-based approach that can hopefully dispel some of these incorrect assumptions.

Results From the German Fungal Keratitis Registry: Significant Differences Between Cases With and Without a History of Contact Lens Use

PURPOSE

Fungal keratitis (FK) is a serious ophthalmic disease with a potentially devastating outcome that seems to be increasing in recent years. The use of contact lenses (CLs) was evaluated as a risk factor for FK to determine possible differences in course and outcome.

METHODS

Data from 173 cases reported in the German FK registry until August 2019 were evaluated regarding CL behavior, other ophthalmological and general risk factors, age, sex, identified pathogens, conservative and surgical therapy, visual acuity, and findings at admission and follow-up.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-four eyes from 173 patients between 2000 and 2019 were included [64.4% women, median age 54 (39; 72) years]; 49.7% wore CL, of which 81.3% were soft CL, and 50.3% had no history of contact lens use (NCL). CL users were significantly more often women and otherwise healthy (CL: 80.2% vs. NCL: 48.9%; P < 0.0001). The spectrum of pathogens among CL users showed a significantly higher proportion of infections with filamentous pathogens, in particular Fusarium sp. (total filament: CL 69.8% vs. NCL 27.3%; P = 0.0001; Fusarium sp.: CL 50.0% vs. NCL 14.8%; P < 0.0001). Overall, 54.6% required keratoplasty and 8.6% enucleation.

CONCLUSIONS

CLS are the most important risk factor for FK in Germany. With CLs, typically, the infection is caused by molds, and patients are comparably younger and otherwise healthy. Often, extensive surgery is needed. To evaluate changes in the pathogen and resistance spectrum and to further monitor possible CL-related risk factors, a consistent collection of data remains paramount.

Presbyopia - A Review of Current Treatment Options and Emerging Therapies

Presbyopia is a common age-related vision disorder characterized by a progressive inability to focus on near objects. If uncorrected or under-corrected, presbyopia can significantly impact patients' quality of life. Presbyopia represents an area of considerable unmet need due to its rising prevalence worldwide as the population ages, the high proportion of under-treated individuals in some parts of the world, and the limitations of currently available corrective methods. Progressive or bifocal spectacles are associated with peripheral blur, a restricted visual field and impaired depth perception, which have been linked to an increased risk of falls in the elderly. Contact lens options can be difficult to maintain due to the development of age-related dry eye symptoms and reduced manual dexterity. Other corrective methods involve surgical interventions that modify the optics of the cornea, replace the crystalline lens, or attempt to restore active accommodation. While patients undergoing surgery report satisfactory outcomes post-operatively, many of them eventually require reading glasses. Non-invasive therapies with novel mechanisms of action are currently being investigated; these include miotic agents and UNR844, a lipoic acid choline ester. In this narrative review, available evidence on presbyopia prevalence, quality of life impact and risk factors are described, with a focus on observational studies in non-clinical settings. The diagnosis pathway and patient journey in presbyopia are outlined, and various treatment options are analyzed. The data reviewed herein reveals significant gaps in the provision of vision correction for this common condition, with a paucity of effective, non-invasive treatment options broadly accessible to presbyopic individuals.

Frequency of Contact Lens Complications Between Contact Lens Wearers Using Multipurpose Solutions Versus Hydrogen Peroxide in the United States and Canada

OBJECTIVES

To retrospectively compare frequency of contact lens (CL) complications in soft CL users of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and multipurpose solutions (MPS).

METHODS

This was a multicenter, retrospective chart review of CL records from each patient's three most recent eye examinations at academic and private practices. Patients must have used the same solution type for at least 3 years. Univariate analyses were conducted using t tests, and chi-square or Fisher's exact test for categorical measures.

RESULTS

There were 1,137 patients included, with 670 (59%) using MPS and 467 (41%) H2O2. In total, 706 (62%) experienced at least one complication; 409 used MPS and 297 used H2O2. There was no difference in the proportion of patients experiencing at least one complication between MPS (61%) and H2O2 (64%) (P=0.38). Multipurpose solutions users were more likely to report discomfort compared with H2O2 users (P=0.04). Presumed microbial keratitis was experienced by 16 MPS and nine H2O2 users (P=0.60).

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences were found in the frequency of CL complications between MPS and H2O2. H2O2 users were less likely to report discomfort and thus switching to a H2O2 system may be an alternative in CL users with discomfort.

Inflammatory status predicts contact lens discomfort under adverse environmental conditions

PURPOSE

To characterize and predict the clinical and tear molecular response of contact lens (CL) wearers exposed to a controlled adverse desiccating environment (CADE).

METHODS

Objective and subjective variables and tear cytokine levels were evaluated of monthly silicone hydrogel CL wearers pre- and post-90 min of CADE exposure. Unsupervised hierarchical agglomerative clustering based on relative change from baseline values was used to identify response profiles (clusters). A multiple logistic regression model was used to identify cluster membership predictors.

RESULTS

Forty-seven CL wearers were divided into 3 clusters having similar age (mean: 27.7 ± 7.7 years) and sex distribution. All of them showed a significant (p ≤ 0.05) increase in limbal hyperemia and staining after CADE exposure. Additionally, Cluster-1 (n = 22, 46.8%) membership was characterized by a significant (p ≤ 0.05) higher worsening of corneal and limbal staining, increased CL wear symptoms, and reduced epidermal-growth-factor and increased interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-6 tear levels. Cluster-2 (n = 22, 46.8%) showed no changes (p > 0.05) in symptoms after CADE; however, their IL-12p70, monocyte-chemoattractant-protein-1 and regulated-on-activation, normal-T-cell-expressed-and-secreted (RANTES) post-exposure tear levels significantly (p ≤ 0.05) increased. Finally, Cluster-3 (n = 3, 6.4%) mainly showed significant higher blink rate (78.1 ± 21.7) during CADE. Corneal staining and tear IL-12p70 levels were identified as Cluster-1 membership predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of silicone hydrogel CL wearers exposed to CADE showed a worsening of the ocular surface integrity and an upregulated tear inflammatory status. However, only half of them reported worsening of CL wear symptoms. These CL wearers were detected based on corneal integrity and tear inflammatory status. These findings can help reduce CL wear discontinuation and drop out.

Can Tinted Lenses Be Used to Manipulate Pupil Size and Visual Performance When Wearing Multifocal Contact Lenses?

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of wearing neutral density (ND) filters with different transmittance levels over multifocal contact lenses (MTF CLs) on pupil size, visual functions and the dynamic accommodative response under daylight conditions in early presbyopes.

METHODS

Seventeen individuals aged between 40 and 48 years (mean age 42.35±2.62 years) were recruited to participate in this study. This study involved a repeated-measures design with two within-subject factors: optical condition (which had five levels), and fixation distance (which had three levels). The five optical conditions were no correction (baseline), MTF CL wear, MTF CL wear + 0.3 ND filter (transmission [Tv]=48.38%), MTF CL wear + 0.6 ND filter (Tv=27.12%) and MTF CL wear + 0.9 ND filter (Tv=14.58%). The three fixation distances were 3 m, 40 cm and 20 cm. Outcome measures were pupil size, the measured accommodative response (optical aid + physiological accommodation), distance visual acuity (VA), near VA and contrast sensitivity (CS).

RESULTS

There was no effect of optical condition on the accommodative response; however, there was a significant effect of fixation distance. (Accommodative response was 0.44±0.29, 1.83±0.37 and 4.03±0.46 D for fixation distances of 3 m, 40 cm and 20 cm, respectively; p<0.05.) There was a significant effect of optical condition (p<0.05) and of fixation distance on pupil size variation (5.13±0.90 mm for 3 m, 4.71±0.92 mm for 40 cm and 4.11±1.04 mm for 20 cm; p<0.05). Optical condition had a significant effect on distance VA, near VA and CS (p<0.05). Compared to the reduction in distance VA, near VA was relatively small (two-letter reduction with 0.9 ND) and unlikely to be clinically significant.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that in a group of adults with early presbyopia, the use of ND filters enlarged pupil size. However, the combination of enlarged pupils and MTF CL did not improve distance vision, and if transmittance was reduced by 50% it resulted in decrements in vision and CS. MTF CL designs which incorporate tints, or tints that vary in darkness in response to ultraviolet exposure, should consider these findings.

The short-term physiological impact of switching reusable silicone hydrogel wearers into a hydrogel daily disposable multifocal

Purpose: To evaluate ocular physiological responses to etafilcon A multifocal (etMF) daily disposable (DD) lenses after 4 weeks of wear, when switching from habitual silicone hydrogel (SiHy) daily wear.

Method: A single-arm, open-label, bilateral dispensing study was conducted in 39 habitual spherical SiHy wearers (14 hyperopes; 25 myopes). Clinical visits occurred with habitual SiHy (control) at baseline and after 4 weeks of etMF DD open-eye lens wear at exit. Objective limbal/bulbar hyperemia using the Oculus K5M (0–4) and subjective grading of lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE) (0–4) were tested for non-inferiority (NI), using a margin of 1 grade. Corneal thickness along a 10 mm cord was measured using the Visante OCT and tested for NI using a 30 μm margin. Corneal staining area was graded (0–100%).

Results: The least-square mean differences (LSMD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) between etMF DD and habitual SiHy in central and peripheral corneal thickness (μm) were 3.64 (−2.0, 9.29) and 3.0 (−7.72, 13.72) in hyperopic, and 3.56 (−0.66, 7.78) and 6.40 (−1.62, 14.42) in myopic subjects. The LSMD (95% CI) for bulbar and limbal hyperemia were −0.08 (−0.19, 0.02) and −0.01 (−0.12, 0.09) in hyperopes, and 0.04 (−0.03, 0.12) and 0.04 (−0.04, 0.11) in myopes. The LSMD (95% CI) for LWE were 0.11 (−0.39, 0.60) and 0.30 (−0.07, 0.67) for hyperopes and myopes, respectively.

Conclusions: No clinically significant differences in a variety of physiological responses were found when habitual reusable SiHy daily wear subjects were refitted into hydrogel etMF, when the subjects were followed for 4 weeks.

Novel in vitro method to determine pre-lens tear break-up time of hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses

PURPOSE

To develop an in vitro model to determine pre-lens non-invasive break-up time (NIBUT) and to subsequently use this method to compare the NIBUT over contemporary daily disposable (DD) contact lenses (CL).

METHODS

Three silicone hydrogel (SH) and two conventional hydrogel (CH) DD CLs were incubated in an artificial tear solution (ATS). A model blink cell (MBC) was utilised to mimic intermittent air exposure. CLs were repeatedly submerged for 3 seconds (s) and exposed to air for 10 s over periods of 2, 6, 12, and 16 hours (h). NIBUTs (n = 4) were determined out of the blister pack (T₀) and at the end of each incubation period.

RESULTS

Overall, nesofilcon A showed the longest NIBUTs (p < 0.001). At T₀, CHs revealed significantly longer NIBUTs (p ≤ 0.001) than SHs. After 2 h, nesofilcon A showed the longest NIBUT, however, this was only statistically significant compared with delefilcon A (p ≤ 0.001). After 6 h, nesofilcon A NIBUT was significantly longer than all other CLs (p ≤ 0.001). Etafilcon A showed a significantly longer NIBUT (p ≤ 0.001) after 12 h and delefilcon A had the longest NIBUT (p ≤ 0.001) after 16 h. Statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05) changes of NIBUT within the lens materials varied between time points. After 16 h, all CLs showed significant reductions in NIBUTs (p ≤ 0.001) in comparison to T₀.

CONCLUSION

NIBUT values reduced gradually over time and varying levels of deposition impacted measured pre-lens NIBUTs. While NIBUT of CH materials are longer immediately out of the blister pack, after tear film exposure, the NIBUTs obtained using this methodology became very similar.

Development of Silicone Hydrogel Antimicrobial Contact Lenses with Mel4 Peptide Coating

SIGNIFICANCE

This study investigated the development of an antimicrobial coating on silicone hydrogel contact lenses that may have the capacity to reduce contact lens-related infection and inflammatory events.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to develop an effective antimicrobial coating for silicone hydrogel contact lenses by attachment of Mel4 peptide.

METHODS

Lotrafilcon A, comfilcon A, somofilcon A, senofilcon A, and lotrafilcon B silicone hydrogel contact lenses were plasma coated with acrylic acid followed by Mel4 antimicrobial peptide immobilization by covalent coupling. Peptide immobilization was quantified by x-ray electron spectroscopy. Contact lens diameter, base curve, center thickness, and lens surface wettability were measured by captive-bubble contact-angle technique. Antimicrobial activity of the lenses was determined against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus by viable plate count and also after soaking with artificial tears solution for 1 day. In vivo safety and biocompatibility were determined in an animal model for 1 week.

RESULTS

Mel4 peptide-coated silicone hydrogel contact lenses were associated with high antimicrobial inhibition (>2 log), except for lotrafilcon B and senofilcon A. Lotrafilcon B did not exhibit any activity, whereas senofilcon A showed 1.4- and 0.7-log inhibition against P. aeruginosa and S. aureus, respectively. X-ray electron spectroscopy revealed significant increases in the lens surface-bound amide nitrogen in all contact lenses except for lotrafilcon B. All contact lens parameters remained unchanged except for the base curve and center thickness for senofilcon A. Mel4 immobilization was associated with a decrease in contact angle. Mel4-coated contact lens wear was not associated with any signs or symptoms of ocular irritation in a rabbit model study. Reduced antimicrobial activity was observed with all the lenses after soaking with artificial tears solution or rabbit wear.

CONCLUSIONS

Mel4 antimicrobial coating may be an effective option for development of antimicrobial silicone hydrogel contact lenses.

Presbyopic and non-presbyopic contact lens opinions and vision correction preferences

PURPOSE

To compare vision correction preferences, refractive error, and gender of non-presbyopes and presbyopes.

METHODS

Adults who wear spectacles or contact lenses completed a survey about refractive correction opinions and refractive error was measured.

RESULTS

Of the 304 subjects, 38.2% were presbyopic (≥40 years) and 59.2% were female. Spectacles were the primary vision correction for 78.0% of subjects. Compared to contact lens wearers, the proportion of presbyopes was higher (p=0.006) in spectacle wearers. There was no difference in the proportion of presbyopes and non-presbyopes who have tried contact lenses (p=0.2) or who would prefer to wear contact lenses (p=0.2). In contact lens wearers, there was no difference in the proportion of presbyopes and non-presbyopes with a history of temporary discontinuation (p=0.9). Within the contact lens wearing group, there was no refractive error difference between presbyopes and non-presbyopes (spherical equivalent p=0.6; power vector J0 p=0.5; power vector J45 p=0.4; anisometropia p=0.2). Overall, contact lens wearers were more likely to be female (p=0.004). There was no difference in gender in presbyopic and non-presbyopic contact lens wearers (p=0.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Presbyopes and non-presbyopes have similar opinions about spectacles and contact lenses. Presbyopes of all refractive errors prefer contact lens correction when good vision and comfort can be achieved. Eye care providers should not assume that presbyopia, refractive error, or gender are factors that preclude a patient from being interested in contact lens wear.