The effect of lid hygiene on the tear film and ocular surface, and the prevalence of Demodex blepharitis in university students

Double-Blind Comparison of Eyelash Epilation Techniques for the Purpose of Demodex folliculorum Mite Retrieval

OBJECTIVE

Demodex folliculorum blepharitis is typically confirmed with lash epilation and microscopic identification of mites. However, mite counts may vary with the epilation technique. As there is no gold standard to epilating lashes for the purposes of mite counts, the aim of this study was to compare three epilation techniques.

METHOD

A prospective randomized double-blind study compared three epilation techniques on lashes with cylindrical dandruff. Techniques included (A) direct pulling of the lash; (B) rotating the lash before epilation; and (C) sliding the cylindrical dandruff away, lash rotation, and epilation. Mean mite counts were analyzed using a repeated-measures analysis of variance.

RESULTS

Forty (n=40) participants (20 M: 20 F, mean age of 62.3±17.1 years) revealed similar mite counts between right (1.43±1.74) and left (1.35±1.59) eyes ( P =0.63). A significant difference ( P =0.03) in mite count was noted (technique A: 1.05 ± 1.60; technique B 1.76 ± 1.80; and technique C 1.36 ± 1.54) with technique B yielding the highest mite count ( P =0.04).

CONCLUSION

Demodex mite count is a key parameter in establishing infestation or to determine treatment efficacy. This study revealed that rotating the lash before epilation yielded the highest mite count. Future studies should report the epilation technique used to allow for study comparisons.

Refining the Diagnostic Technique to Determine Prevalence of Demodex Mites in Eyelash Hair Follicles Within Standard Ophthalmic Practice: A Single-Center Outpatient Clinical Study

Purpose

A high density of Demodex infestation in human eyelids and eyelash follicles has been implicated in a variety of ocular surface conditions. However, Demodex infestation often goes undiagnosed and untreated, due to an overlap in signs and symptoms with other sources of ocular surface inflammation. We sought to refine the diagnostic technique for outpatient assessment for Demodex infestation and determine prevalence of Demodex mites in the hair follicles of eyelashes from patients in a standard ophthalmic practice.

Patients and Methods

Patients recruited from a single outpatient ophthalmology clinic were examined for the presence of Demodex mites following standard ophthalmic consultation. During anterior segment biomicroscopic examination, investigators searched for cylindrical dandruff and collarettes around the base of patient eyelashes. These were removed, and individual eyelashes manipulated with tweezers to reveal Demodex mites. Presence of Demodex, cylindrical dandruff and collarettes, time taken to identify the first Demodex mite, mean number of Demodex mites per hair shaft, and patient-reported symptoms of blepharitis were recorded and analyzed to determine potential correlations.

Results

A total of 173 patients were recruited, of whom 106 were included in Demodex prevalence analyses. Demodex infestation was identified in 100/106 (94%) patients, with a mean time of 2 minutes and 20 seconds taken to find the first Demodex mite and a mean number of 3 mites identified per hair shaft. Presence of Demodex significantly correlated with the presence of cylindrical dandruff (98/106 [92%] patients; p < 0.001), but not with the presence of collarettes (62/106 [58%] patients; p = 0.230) or symptoms of blepharitis (15/106 [14%] patients; p = 0.591).

Conclusion

These results highlight the pervasiveness of Demodex infestation, predicted by the presence of cylindrical dandruff, in the eyelashes of patients in a standard ophthalmic practice. They support the use of a non-invasive diagnostic technique to allow fast, simple identification of Demodex by ophthalmologists and optometrists in outpatient clinical practice.

Investigation of the Relationship Between Ocular Demodex Colonization and the Conjunctival Flora

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine whether ocular Demodex colonization leads to changes in the conjunctival flora in healthy middle-aged individuals.

METHODS

This study included 70 patients who applied to an ophthalmology clinic with a complaints of presbyopia. Two eyelash specimens from the lower eyelids of both eyes were obtained from each individual. In eyelash specimens were examined for Demodex spp. by direct wet smearing under microscopy. Conjunctival culture samples were cultivated on blood agar, eosin methylene blue and chocolate agar.

RESULTS

In the 38.5% of the individuals, Demodex spp. mites were found in the eyelashes, out of which 11.4% were Demodex brevis and 27.1% Demodex folliculorum. Bacterial growth was observed in 82.9% of the samples examined. The most frequently detected bacterium was Staphylococcus epidermidis (57%).

CONCLUSION

Although Demodex spp. infestation has been shown to be related to diseases on ocular surface of eyes such as pterygium, xerophthalmia and chalazion, we did not observe that it induces changes in ocular surface flora in healthy adults.

The Efficacy of Kohl (Surma) and Erythromycin in Treatment of Blepharitis: An Open-Label Clinical Trial

Introduction

Blepharitis is a common and chronic form of eyelid inflammation. Blepharitis treatment aims to decrease symptoms through antibacterial effects. One of the most common treatments of eyelid diseases in traditional medicine is using kohl. This clinical trial aimed to investigate its efficacy as a complementary treatment in staphylococcal blepharitis through an open-label clinical trial.

Materials and Methods

Thirty patients were randomized to receive kohl in one eye contralateral and erythromycin ointment in another eye for 90 days. At baseline and after 90 days of treatment, symptoms, clinical signs, and side effects of treatments were recorded. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS software, version 19.

Results

Despite randomization, there was a significant difference between the intervention and control eyes in the baseline mean clinical score (intervention eye: 9.86 (2.95) and control eye: 4.30 (2.81), P < 0.001). The degree of reduction of related signs and symptoms in the eyes treated with kohl was significantly higher than that in the control group: (5.2 vs. 2.20, P < 0.001) for symptoms and (7.40 vs. 2.46, P < 0.001) for clinical signs. Cohen's d statistic for mean difference of sign and symptom was 2.4 and 1.75, respectively, indicating a very strong effect.

Conclusion

The present study results demonstrated a significant improvement in blepharitis-related signs and symptoms. The degree of improvement in the eyes treated with kohl was much higher than that in the control eyes.