Timeliness of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III adenocarcinoma of the colon: a measure of quality of care

Measurement that matters: A systematic review and modified Delphi of multidisciplinary colorectal cancer quality indicators

AIM

To develop a priority set of quality indicators (QIs) for use by colorectal cancer (CRC) multidisciplinary teams (MDTs).

METHODS

The review search strategy was executed in four databases from 2009-August 2019. Two reviewers screened abstracts/manuscripts. Candidate QIs and characteristics were extracted using a tailored abstraction tool and assessed for scientific soundness. To prioritize candidate indicators, a modified Delphi consensus process was conducted. Consensus was sought over two rounds; (1) multidisciplinary expert workshops to identify relevance to Australian CRC MDTs, and (2) an online survey to prioritize QIs by clinical importance.

RESULTS

A total of 93 unique QIs were extracted from 118 studies and categorized into domains of care within the CRC patient pathway. Approximately half the QIs involved more than one discipline (52.7%). One-third of QIs related to surgery of primary CRC (31.2%). QIs on supportive care (6%) and neoadjuvant therapy (6%) were limited. In the Delphi Round 1, workshop participants (n = 12) assessed 93 QIs and produced consensus on retaining 49 QIs including six new QIs. In Round 2, survey participants (n = 44) rated QIs and prioritized a final 26 QIs across all domains of care and disciplines with a concordance level > 80%. Participants represented all MDT disciplines, predominantly surgical (32%), radiation (23%) and medical (20%) oncology, and nursing (18%), across six Australian states, with an even spread of experience level.

CONCLUSION

This study identified a large number of existing CRC QIs and prioritized the most clinically relevant QIs for use by Australian MDTs to measure and monitor their performance.

The optimal time of starting adjuvant chemotherapy after curative surgery in patients with colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is now well-accepted as standard for high-risk stage II and stage III colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, however the optimal time to initiate AC remains elusive.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed using the PubMed and Embase databases. The Hazard ratio (HR) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was used as an effect measure to evaluate primary endpoints. All analyses were conducted using Stata software version 12.0 with the Random-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 30 studies were included in our study. Upon comparison on overall survival (OS), we identified that delaying the initiation of AC for > 8 weeks after operation was significantly associated with poor OS (HR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.27-1.48; P < 0.01). The poor prognostic value of AC delay for > 8 weeks was not undermined by subgroup analysis based on region, tumor site, sample size and study quality. No obvious differences were observed in survival between AC within 5-8 weeks and ≤ 4 weeks (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.96 -1.10; P = 0.46). Moreover, two studies both highlighted that the survival benefit of AC was still statistically significant when AC was applied 5-6 months after surgery compared with the non-chemotherapy group.

CONCLUSIONS

Delaying the initiation of AC for > 8 weeks after surgery was significantly associated with poor OS. AC started within 8 weeks after surgery brought more benefits to CRC patients. There were no obvious differences in survival benefits between AC within 5-8 weeks and ≤ 4 weeks. Compared to patients not receiving AC after surgery, a delay of approximately 5-6 months was still useful to improve prognosis.

The impact of early adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer

PURPOSES

Although adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) has been established as a standard of treatment for advanced rectal cancer, there is no guideline regarding the timing of AC initiation. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the oncologic outcome of early AC initiation and clarify the ideal time to AC among rectal cancer patients receiving preoperative chemo-radiotherapy (preCRT).

METHODS

The medical records of 719 patients who underwent curative resection followed by AC for rectal cancer were analyzed retrospectively. Data distributions were compared according to the calculated cut-off for AC initiation, survival results, and chemotherapy-induced toxicity. Additionally, patients were divided into two groups according to preCRT status and compared with respect to differences in the optimal time to AC.

RESULTS

Overall, a cut-off time point of 20 days after surgery for AC initiation was identified as the optimal interval; this yielded a significant difference in disease-free survival but no significant difference in AC toxicity. In the cut-off analysis of patients treated without preCRT, 19 days was identified as the optimal time to AC. However, for patients treated with preCRT, no significant value affected the survival outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Earlier initiation of AC (within approximately 3 weeks) was associated with better oncological outcomes among patients with rectal cancer. Additionally, the optimal timing of AC was unclear among patients who received preCRT; this might be attributable to an undetermined role of AC after preCRT or the effects of complications such as anastomotic leakage.

Impact of timing of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival in stage III colon cancer: a population-based study

Background

There is no consensus regarding the optimal time to initiate adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery for stage III colon cancer, and the relevant postoperative complications that cause delays in adjuvant chemotherapy are unknown.

Methods

Eligible patients aged ≥66 years who were diagnosed with stage III colon cancer from 1992 to 2008 were identified using the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database. Kaplan-Meier analysis and a Cox proportional hazards model were utilized to evaluate the impact of the timing of adjuvant chemotherapy on overall survival (OS).

Results

A total of 18,491 patients were included. Delayed adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with worse OS (9–12 weeks: hazard ratio [HR] = 1.222, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.063–1.405; 13–16 weeks: HR = 1.252, 95% CI = 1.041–1.505; ≥ 17 weeks: HR = 1.969, 95% CI = 1.663–2.331). The efficacies of adjuvant chemotherapy within 5–8 weeks and ≤4 weeks were similar (HR = 1.045, 95% CI = 0.921–1.185). Compared with the non-chemotherapy group, chemotherapy initiated at ≥21 weeks did not significantly improve OS (HR = 0.882, 95% CI = 0.763–1.018). Patients with postoperative complications, particularly cardiac arrest, ostomy infection, shock, and septicemia, had a significantly higher risk of a 4- to 11-week delay in adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Adjuvant chemotherapy initiated within 8 weeks was acceptable for patients with stage III colon cancer. Delayed adjuvant chemotherapy after 8 weeks was significantly associated with worse OS. However, adjuvant chemotherapy might still be useful even with a delay of approximately 5 months. Moreover, postoperative complications were significantly associated with delayed adjuvant chemotherapy.

Delay in Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Survival Advantage in Stage III Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy after resection is the standard of care for stage III colon cancer, yet many patients omit chemotherapy. We aimed to describe the impact of delayed chemotherapy on overall survival across multiple time points.

STUDY DESIGN

The 2006 to 2014 National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried for patients with single primary stage III adenocarcinoma of the colon. Patients were grouped by receipt and timing of chemotherapy from resection date: chemotherapy omitted, <6 weeks, 6 to 8 weeks, 8 to 12 weeks, 12 to 24 weeks, and >24 weeks. Subgroup analyses were performed for those with comorbidities and those who had postoperative complications. Overall survival was compared using Cox proportional hazard modeling, adjusting for patient, tumor, and facility characteristics.

RESULTS

In total, 72,057 patients were included; 20,807 omitted chemotherapy, 22,705 received it at <6 weeks, 15,412 between 6 and 8 weeks, 9,049 between 8 and 12 weeks, 3,595 between 12 and 24 weeks, and 489 at >24 weeks after resection. Compared with patients who omitted chemotherapy, patients who received chemotherapy at <6 weeks (hazard ratio [HR] 0.44), 6 to 8 weeks (HR 0.45), 8 to 12 weeks (HR 0.52), 12 to 24 weeks (HR 0.61), and >24 weeks (HR 0.68) had superior overall survival (p < 0.001). This survival benefit was preserved across subgroups (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

After resection of stage III colon cancer, patients should receive adjuvant chemotherapy within 6 to 8 weeks for maximal benefit. However, chemotherapy should be offered to patients who are outside the optimal window, who have significant comorbidities, or who have had a complication more than 24 weeks from resection to improve the overall survival compared with omitting chemotherapy.

Multimodal Prehabilitation Programs as a Bundle of Care in Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Prehabilitation reflects a proactive process of preoperative optimization undertaken between cancer diagnosis and definitive surgical treatment, with the intent of improving physiological capacity to withstand the major insult of surgery. Prehabilitation before GI cancer surgery is currently not widely adopted, and most research has focused on unimodal interventions such as exercise therapy, nutritional supplementation, and hematinic optimization. A review of the existing literature was undertaken to investigate the impact of multimodal prehabilitation programs as a "bundle of care."

DATA SOURCE

A systematic literature search was performed utilizing Medline, PubMed, Embase, Cinahl, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases.

STUDY SELECTION

The quality of studies was assessed by using the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias (randomized trials) and the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment scale (cohort studies).

INTERVENTION

Studies were chosen that involved pre-operative optimization of patients before GI cancer surgery.

MAIN OUTCOMES

The primary outcome measured was the impact of prehabilitation programs on preoperative fitness and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 544 studies identified, 20 were included in the qualitative analysis. Two trials investigated the impact of multimodal prehabilitation (exercise, nutritional supplementation, anxiety management). Trials exploring prehabilitation with unimodal interventions included impact of exercise therapy (7 trials), impact of preoperative iron replacement (5 trials), nutritional optimization (5 trials), and impact of preoperative smoking cessation (2 trials). Compliance within the identified studies was variable (range: 16%-100%).

LIMITATIONS

There is a lack of adequately powered trials that utilize objective risk stratification and uniform end points. As such, a meta-analysis was not performed because of the heterogeneity in study design.

CONCLUSION

Although small studies are supportive of multimodal interventions, there are insufficient data to make a conclusion about the integration of prehabilitation in GI cancer surgery as a bundle of care. Larger, prospective trials, utilizing uniform objective risk stratification and structured interventions, with predefined clinical and health economic end points, are required before definitive value can be assigned to prehabilitation programs.

Survival and time interval from surgery to the start of chemotherapy for patients with stage II and III colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Usually adjuvant chemotherapy is started within 12 weeks of surgery, but the evidence on the commencing time is lacking. Our aim was to investigate the association of initiating post-surgery treatment within six weeks vs. six to ten weeks vs. more than ten weeks with survival.

METHODS

We analysed the association of treatment and its timing with survival among patients who were diagnosed and underwent surgery for stage II or III colon cancer from 2012 to 2013 at the National Cancer Institute, Lithuania.

RESULTS

Of the 86 patients, 78% were still alive on December 31, 2013. Patients who received chemotherapy within six weeks after surgery were more likely to survive. However, those who received chemotherapy 6-10 weeks after surgery had better survival (p - 0.014, hazard ratio 0.80, 95% CI 0.60-0.99) than those who began chemotherapy treatment more than ten weeks after surgery (p - 0.173 hazard ratio 0.55, 95% CI 0.12-0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

The results from this study show that optimal timing of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with resected colon cancer within six weeks and associated with better survival.

Delivery of adjuvant chemotherapy among stage III colon cancer patients at a public versus private hospital in New York City

PURPOSE

Prior studies of timeliness of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) initiation in stage III colon cancer have suggested longer time to AC at public compared with private hospitals. Few studies have explored differences in AC completion. We investigated whether timely initiation and completion of AC differed between a public and private hospital, affiliated with the same academic institution in a large, urban setting.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of stage III colon cancer patients who had surgery and AC at the same medical center between 2008 and 2015, either at its affiliated public hospital (n = 43) or private hospital (n = 79). We defined timely initiation as receiving AC within 60 days postoperatively, and completion as receiving ≥ 75% of planned AC. Univariate and stepwise multivariable logistic regressions were used to identify factors associated with AC delivery.

RESULTS

Median number of days to AC was significantly greater among patients at the public (53, range 31-231) compared with the private hospital (43, range 25-105; p = 0.002). However, the percentage of patients with timely AC initiation did not differ substantially by hospital (74 vs 81%, p = 0.40). In multivariable analysis, age (OR 0.95/year, 95% CI 0.91-0.99) and laparoscopic versus open surgery (OR 5.65, 95% CI 1.92-16.62) were significant factors associated with timely AC initiation. Moreover, AC completion did not differ significantly between public (83.7%) and private (89.9%) hospital patients (p = 0.32).

CONCLUSIONS

The proportions of patients with timely initiation and completion of AC were similar at a public and private hospital affiliated with a large, urban medical center. Future research should investigate how specific system-level factors help alleviate this expected difference in timely care delivery.

Trends in colorectal cancer mortality in hispanics: a SEER analysis

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality among Hispanics is lower than Non-Hispanic Whites (NHW). If Hispanics receive equitable care and achieve the same degree of health benefit, their trend of better survival should be maintained. This study assesses mortality trends among Hispanics overtime to compare their survival improvement with NHW.

Methods

We used the Incidence-Based Mortality database of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) to assess the mortality gap, which is defined as the difference in stage-specific mortality between NHWs and Hispanics, and currently has an advantage for Hispanics.

Results

There is a statistically significant disparity in stage-specific mortality of CRC by race, with a higher proportion of deaths from metastatic disease among Hispanics than NHW (48% vs. 44% respectively). Comparing the time intervals of 2000-2005 and 2006-2011, mortality was reduced by 15.1% for NHWs and 5.9% for Hispanics, resulting in a narrowing of the mortality gap. The mortality gap between Hispanics and NHW is tapering overtime for every stage of the disease, reflecting that Hispanics have a disparity in CRC mortality.

Conclusion

The mortality gap between Hispanics and NHWs is narrowing, supporting a significantly lower rate of mortality improvement in Hispanics. If the current trend continues, mortality rates in Hispanics will outpace that of NHWs.

The impact of delayed commencement of adjuvant chemotherapy (eight or more weeks) on survival in stage II and III colon cancer: a national population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

To examine the impact of chemotherapy delay on survival in patients with stage II or III colon cancer and the factors associated with the delay (≥8 weeks) of adjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients undergoing curative resection and adjuvant chemotherapy in a national population-based cohort were included.

RESULTS

Among 5355 patients, 154 (2.9%) received chemotherapy more than 8 weeks after surgery. Based on a multivariate analysis, the risk factors associated with chemotherapy delay ≥8 weeks were older age [65 to 74 years (hazard ratio [HR]=1.48) and ≥75 years (HR=1.69), p=0.0354], medical aid status in the health security system (HR=1.76, p=0.0345), and emergency surgery (HR=2.43, p=0.0002). Using an 8-week cutoff, the 3-year overall survival rate was 89.62% and 80.98% in the <8 weeks and ≥8 weeks groups, respectively (p=0.008). Independent prognostic factors for inferior overall survival included chemotherapy delay ≥8 weeks (HR=1.49, p=0.0365), older age [65 to 74 years (HR=1.94) and ≥75 years (HR=3.41), p<0.0001], TNM stage III (HR=2.46, p<0.0001), emergency surgery (HR=1.89, p<0.0001), American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 3 or higher (HR=1.50, p<0.0001), and higher transfusion amounts (HR=1.09, p=0.0392).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that delayed commencement of adjuvant chemotherapy, defined as ≥ 8 weeks, is associated with inferior overall survival in colon cancer patients with stage II or III disease. The delay to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy is influenced by several multidimensional factors, including patient factors (older age), insurance status (medical aid), and treatment-related factors (emergency surgery).

Phase II study on early start of chemotherapy after excising primary colorectal cancer with distant metastases (Pearl Star 02)

Initiating chemotherapy usually requires a delay of more than 4 weeks after surgically resecting colorectal cancer. However, there is little evidence regarding the required delay interval. We have previously reported a pilot study to determine the safety and feasibility of early initiation of chemotherapy after resecting primary colorectal cancer with distant metastases. We aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of early initiation of chemotherapy after resecting colorectal cancer with distant metastases.

This phase II study (trial number UMIN000006310) was a prospective, single-arm trial. A total of 20 patients (men, 15 and women, 5) were enrolled. They underwent XELOX therapy (130 mg/m² oxaliplatin on day 1+1000 mg/m² capecitabine twice daily on days 1-4) on postoperative day 7 and XELOX+bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg bevacizumab on day 1) after the second chemotherapy cycle.

Baseline characteristics included a median age of 64 (range, 43-72) years. Surgical procedures included right hemicolectomy in six patients, sigmoidectomy in three, anterior resection in five, and Hartmann procedure in six. All patients started chemotherapy on postoperative day 7. Median progression-free survival was 14.9 months; overall response rate was 80%. Disease control rate was 100%. Grade 3 or higher hemotoxicity and grade 3 or higher non-hematological toxicity was noted in 5.0% and 25.0% of patients, respectively. Postoperative complications were observed in two patients (superficial incisional surgical site infection and ileus).

Early initiation of chemotherapy after surgery is feasible. These findings suggest future changes of the start time of chemotherapy after surgery.

Impact on Survival on Interval between Surgery and Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Completely Resected Stage IB-IIIA Lung Cancer

Background and Objectives

Complete surgical resection is recommended for early stage lung cancer, and adjuvant chemotherapy is given for stage IB to IIIA disease. No studies have examined the best timing to administer chemotherapy after surgery in lung cancer. This study was to investigate the optimal timing of adjuvant chemotherapy after surgical resection.

Methods

Data collected from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database between January, 2004 and December, 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with stage IB to IIIA lung cancer underwent complete surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy were included. A total of 1522 patients were included. The patients were divided into 4 groups according to the interval between surgery and chemotherapy: group 1, < 30 days; group 2, 30–45 days; group 3, 46–60 days; group 4 > 60 days. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to identify prognostic factors for overall survival.

Results

The numbers of patients in groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 153, 161, 290, and 818, respectively. The 5-year survival rate was 41% in group 1, 48% in group 2, 50% in group 3, and 35% in group 4 (p<0.001). The median survival time was 44.50 months in group 1, 59.53 months in group 2, 67.33 months in group 3 and 36.33 months in group 4 (p<0.001) Survival rate is the poorest when chemotherapy is delayed beyond 60 days after surgical resection Multivariate analysis also indicated the interval between surgery and first course of chemotherapy more than 60 days after surgery was an independent risk factor for survival.

Conclusions

Timing of chemotherapy after surgery is associated with poorer survival in lung cancer patients.

Timing of adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer

AIM

Delay in commencing adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer seems to impair survival in some retrospective studies. This study was planned to evaluate its impact on survival.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study enrolling patients registered from 2000 to 2012 in two large cancer-dedicated institutions in Brazil. The primary outcome was overall survival according to early vs late chemotherapy initiation. The interval between the primary surgery and the start of adjuvant chemotherapy was calculated. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the impact of multiple prognostic factors on survival by Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

By the end of 2012, a total of 1963 Stage II and III colorectal patients were identified and 1318 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, with 22% and 46% of those starting adjuvant chemotherapy within 6 weeks and 8 weeks of surgery. The median period of follow-up was 41 months. Patients starting chemotherapy within 6-8 weeks of surgery had longer overall survival compared with those who started after (6 weeks vs later, hazard ratio 0.76, 95% CI 0.57-0.99, P = 0.046; 8 weeks vs later, hazard ratio 0.74, 95% CI 0.59-0.93, P = 0.011). In the multivariate analysis, age, stage, histological grade, angiolymphatic invasion, emergency surgery and preoperative therapy were independent prognostic factors, but the interval between surgery and start of adjuvant therapy was not.

CONCLUSION

In this large retrospective study, the standard prognostic factors impacted on survival whereas the timing of adjuvant therapy did not. Patients with delayed adjuvant chemotherapy may have worse prognostic factors which could play a major role in their poor outcome.

Defining the value framework for prostate brachytherapy using patient-centered outcome metrics and time-driven activity-based costing

PURPOSE

Value, defined as outcomes over costs, has been proposed as a measure to evaluate prostate cancer (PCa) treatments. We analyzed standardized outcomes and time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) for prostate brachytherapy (PBT) to define a value framework.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with low-risk PCa treated with low-dose-rate PBT between 1998 and 2009 were included. Outcomes were recorded according to the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement standard set, which includes acute toxicity, patient-reported outcomes, and recurrence and survival outcomes. Patient-level costs to 1 year after PBT were collected using TDABC. Process mapping and radar chart analyses were conducted to visualize this value framework.

RESULTS

A total of 238 men were eligible for analysis. Median age was 64 (range, 46-81). Median followup was 5 years (0.5-12.1). There were no acute Grade 3-5 complications. Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite 50 scores were favorable, with no clinically significant changes from baseline to last followup at 48 months for urinary incontinence/bother, bowel bother, sexual function, and vitality. Ten-year outcomes were favorable, including biochemical failure-free survival of 84.1%, metastasis-free survival 99.6%, PCa-specific survival 100%, and overall survival 88.6%. TDABC analysis demonstrated low resource utilization for PBT, with 41% and 10% of costs occurring in the operating room and with the MRI scan, respectively. The radar chart allowed direct visualization of outcomes and costs.

CONCLUSIONS

We successfully created a visual framework to define the value of PBT using the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement standard set and TDABC costs. PBT is associated with excellent outcomes and low costs. Widespread adoption of this methodology will enable value comparisons across providers, institutions, and treatment modalities.

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Hispanics: Treatment Outcomes in a Treated Population

BACKGROUND

In United States Hispanics have disparities in the presentation and outcome of colorectal cancer (CRC) largely attributed to their late presentation and lower socioeconomic status. Impact of treatment, especially in the metastatic setting, in the observed outcome is an unexplored area. We explored the role of treatment in the outcome of metastatic CRC we performed a retrospective analysis to assess the contribution of demographics, tumor characteristics, and health care setting on survival differences.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of patients who were treated with metastatic CRC at Los Angeles County Hospital-University of Southern California (LAC-USC, a public hospital) and Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center (NCCC, private hospital) between 2002 and 2012. Both these institutions are staffed by the same providers and therefore treatment algorithms and access to drugs were similar. We identified metastatic CRC patients who received chemotherapy from administrative records. Demographics, tumor, and treatment related factors were collected. The primary end point was time to progression (TTP: time from the first day of chemotherapy to the date of progression). Overall survival (OS) was measured from the first day of chemotherapy to death or last follow-up. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the population and chi-square, Wilcoxon, and log-rank tests were used for comparison between the groups.

RESULTS

A total of 242 patients, 44% Hispanic, 26% non-Hispanic whites (NHWs), 21% Asian and 9% black were included. Median TTP was 9.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.6-11.6) in Hispanics, and 20.7 months (95% CI, 9.6-27.5; P < .05) in NHWs. Median OS in Hispanics was 16.3 months (95% CI, 13.3-18.5), and in NHWs was 33.5 months (95% CI, 22.1-63.6; P < .001). Hispanics who were treated at LAC-USC had longer TTP in comparison to Hispanics at NCCC (P = .04).

CONCLUSION

Hispanics with metastatic CRC have shorter TTP and OS on first line therapy when adjusted for health care setting, demographics, disease characteristics, and treatment factors.

Determining the Optimal Timing for Initiation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Resection for Stage II and III Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND

Several reports suggest that the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival diminishes over time for colon cancer; however, precise timing of its loss of benefit has not been established.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the relationship between time to adjuvant chemotherapy and survival and to identify a threshold for increased risk of mortality.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective study. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard modeling with restricted cubic splines was used to evaluate the adjusted association between time to adjuvant chemotherapy and overall survival and to establish an optimal threshold for the initiation of therapy.

SETTINGS

Data were collected from the National Cancer Data Base.

PATIENTS

Adults who received adjuvant chemotherapy following resection of stage II to III colon cancers were selected.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measured was overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 7794 patients were included. After adjusting for clinical, tumor, and treatment characteristics, our model determined a critical threshold of chemotherapy initiation at 44 days from surgery, after which there was an increase in the overall mortality. At a median follow-up of 61 months, the risk of mortality was increased in those who received adjuvant chemotherapy after 44 days from surgery (adjusted HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.24; p = 0.002), but not in those who received chemotherapy before 44 days from surgery (p = 0.11). Each additional week of delay was associated with a 7% decrease in survival (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.04-1.10; p < 0.001).

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by selection bias and the inability to compare specific chemotherapy regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

This study objectively determines the optimal timing of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with resected colon cancer. Delay beyond 6 weeks is associated with compromised survival. These findings emphasize the importance of the timely initiation of therapy, and suggest that efforts to enhance recovery following surgery have the potential to improve survival by decreasing delay to adjuvant chemotherapy.

Timing of adjuvant chemotherapy and its relation to survival among patients with stage III colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Currently available data suggest that delaying the start of adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer patients has a detrimental effect on survival. We analysed which factors impact on the timing of adjuvant chemotherapy and evaluated the influence on overall survival (OS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Stage III colon cancer patients who underwent resection and received adjuvant chemotherapy between 2008 and 2013 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Timing of adjuvant chemotherapy was subdivided into: ⩽ 4, 5-6, 7-8, 9-10, 11-12 and 13-16 weeks post-surgery. Multivariable regressions were performed to assess the influence of several factors on the probability of starting treatment within 8 weeks post-surgery and to evaluate the association of timing of adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-year OS.

RESULTS

6620 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, 14% commenced after 8 weeks. Factors associated with starting treatment after 8 weeks were older age (Odds ratio (OR) 65-74 versus < 65 years 1.3 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.14-1.58); OR ⩾ 75 versus < 65 years 1.6 (1.25-1.94)), emergency resection (OR 1.8 (1.41-2.32)), anastomotic leakage (OR 8.1 (6.14-10.62)), referral to another hospital for adjuvant chemotherapy (OR 1.9 (1.36-2.57)) and prolonged postoperative hospital admission (OR 4.7 (3.30-6.68)). Starting 5-8 weeks post-surgery showed no decrease in OS compared to initiation within 4 weeks (Hazard ratio (HR) 5-6 weeks 0.9 (0.79-1.11); HR 7-8 weeks 1.1 (0.91-1.30)). However, commencing beyond 8 weeks was associated with decreased OS compared to initiation within 8 weeks (HR 9-10 weeks 1.4 (1.21-1.68); HR 11-12 weeks 1.3 (1.06-1.59); HR 13-16 weeks 1.7 (1.23-2.23)).

CONCLUSION

Our data support initiating adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer patients within 8 weeks post-surgery.

Improved survival with early adjuvant chemotherapy after colonic resection for stage III colonic cancer: A nationwide study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In stage III colonic cancer, time from surgery to start of adjuvant chemotherapy may influence survival. In this study, we evaluated the effect of timing of adjuvant therapy on survival.

METHODS

Database study from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group's national database. Data on patients with stage III colonic cancer operated between January 1, 2005 and August 31, 2012 were retrieved. Perioperative variables, surgical modality, and time to adjuvant therapy (<4, 4-8, or >8 weeks) were evaluated and Cox regression was performed to identify factors influencing survival.

RESULTS

The final population included 1,827 patients scheduled for adjuvant chemotherapy. Adjuvant therapy started within 4 and 8 weeks improved survival when compared to start later than 8 weeks (HR [95%CI]: 1.7 [1.1-2.6]; P = 0.024 and 1.4 [1.07-1.8]; P = 0.013, respectively), whereas there was no significant difference in survival with start after 4 versus 8 weeks (1.2 [0.8-1.8]; P = 0.37).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival increased when adjuvant therapy was started within 8 weeks after surgery for stage III colonic cancer.

Factors Implicated for Delay of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Observational Studies

BACKGROUND

The survival benefit of administering adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in colorectal cancer is well established, as is the impact of its timing. Although various factors have been associated with treatment delay, their implications remain controversial. We determined clinicopathological factors associated with delay in transition to AC via systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

Studies assessing factors for delay in initiating AC were identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Databases. Studies were included only if relevant clinicopathological factors were adequately described and appropriate comparative groups were balanced. For each study, the odds ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) were estimated, regarding response to early versus delayed AC initiation.

RESULTS

We identified 15 eligible studies involving 67,537 patients. Twelve studies were multicentre studies and three were single-center cohort studies. Meta-analysis demonstrated age >75 years [4 studies, OR = 1.44 (95 % CI 1.32-1.58)], marital status-single [3 studies, OR = 1.32 (95 % CI 1.20-1.44)], low socioeconomic status (SES) [7 studies, OR = 1.67 (95 % CI 1.32-2.12)], worse comorbidity status [5 studies, OR = 1.47 (95 % CI 1.14-1.90)], low tumour grade [7 studies, OR = 1.06 (95 % CI 1.02-1.11)], prolonged length of stay [3 studies, OR 2.37 (95 % CI 2.10-2.68)], and readmission [3 studies, OR = 3.23 (95 % CI 1.66-6.26)] were significant predictors of delayed initiation of AC. Laparoscopy compared to an open surgical approach was a significant predictor of earlier AC initiation [5 studies, OR = 0.70 (95 % CI 0.51-0.97)].

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopy is associated with earlier initiation of AC, encouraging its increased adoption. Social isolation and low SES merit consideration of approaches that counter the lack of social support and deprivation to improve cancer outcomes.

Effect of delay in adjuvant oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Less than 8 weeks has been recommended as the optimal time to initiate AC based on 2 meta-analyses that suggested worse survival with delayed AC. However, neither study included patients treated with an oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. We aimed to investigate the effect of delay in initiating oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy on RFS and CSS for stage III colon cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Records of patients who initiated oxaliplatin-based AC for stage III colon cancer between 2006 and 2011 at the British Columbia Cancer Agency were retrospectively reviewed. Cox proportional models were used to analyze the effect of time to AC (TTAC) on RFS and CSS. TTAC was categorized into ≤ 8 weeks (G1) and > 8 weeks (G2).

RESULTS

Six hundred thirty-five patients were included (G1, n = 291; G2, n = 344). Median time from surgery to initiation of AC was 8.3 weeks. At a median follow-up of 57.9 months, 176 patients (27.7%) had disease recurrence and 118 (18.6%) had died. Five-year RFS was 70.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65.2-76.5) for G1 and 72.1% (95% CI, 67.2-77) for G2. Five-year CSS was 82% for G1 (95% CI, 87.09-76.91) and 82.8% for G2 (95% CI, 78.30-87.30). On multivariate analysis, delayed TTAC did not have prognostic significance on either RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.08; P = .609) or CSS (HR, 1.02; P = .893).

CONCLUSION

In our population-based study, TTAC after stage III colon cancer resection did not have an effect on RFS or CSS. Contrary to most of the existing data, which are primarily based on 5-fluorouracil-based AC, delay of oxaliplatin-based AC beyond 8 weeks did not appear to be associated with inferior outcomes.