Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer in Patients under 50 Years of Age: Demographics, Disease Characteristics, and Survival

Prognosis of early-onset versus late-onset sporadic colorectal cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In the last years, a dramatic increase in colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnoses in early-onset (EO) patients has been observed. The prognosis of EO-CRC compared to late-onset (LO) patients is still unclear. This meta-analysis aims to clarify whether there is any difference in the prognosis between the two groups.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted on EMBASE-Medline, Pubmed and Cochrane Library in March 2024 to identify studies comparing overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrence (LR) and distant recurrence (DR) risk outcomes between EO-CRC (<50 years old) and LO-CRC (>50 years old) with at least 50 patients per group and one year of follow-up. The risk of bias was assessed with the ROBINS-E tool. Data from stage prevalence and survival were extracted and meta-analysed. Meta-regression was used to identify impacting effect modifiers. The PROSPERO registration number was CRD42024573264.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies were identified; 1,062,037 patients (13.4% EO-CRC and 86.6% LO-CRC) were included in the stage prevalence and 567,689 in the prognostic meta-analysis. Overall, 60% of the EO-CRC and 49% of the LO-CRC were diagnosed with an advanced stage (III-IV) of disease (RR 1.26, 95%CI 1.19-1.35, I2=87%). EO-CRC had a better OS than LO-CRC (HR 0.89, 95%CI 0.81-0.99, I2=89%) but equal CSS (HR 0.94, 95%CI 0.83-1.06, I2=82%), DFS (HR 1.05 95%CI 0.94-1.16, I2=76%), LR (HR 1.41, 95%CI 0.62-3.18, I2=49%) and DR (HR 1.51, 95%CI 0.79-2.89) risk. Meta-regression analysis identified a worse DFS in the EO-CRC rectal cancer subgroup (HR 1.14, 95%CI 1.00-1.30, I2=0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the high heterogeneity of existing studies, EO-CRC patients are diagnosed with significantly more advanced stages than LO-CRC, although this is not reflected in any difference in cancer-related survival. There is an urgent need for increased vigilance in the early detection of CRC in young patients.

Treatment patterns in metastatic early-onset rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Early onset rectal cancer (EORC) is increasing internationally. While EORC cancer presents with some distinct clinical features, there is currently insufficient evidence that age of onset should alter treatment. This study examines treatment patterns for EO versus late-onset (LO) metastatic rectal cancer in Canterbury, New Zealand, to better understand appropriate treatment strategies and there effect on patient outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective study on all patients diagnosed with stage 4 rectal adenocarcinoma in Canterbury from 2010 to 2021 was undertaken. Patients under 50 were compared to a control group aged 60-74, analysing treatment patterns, hospital stays, and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Between 2010 and 2021, there were 949 rectal cancer diagnoses in Canterbury, of which 23 were EO and 64 were LO with stage 4 cancer. Survival analysis revealed a significant difference in median survival times between EORC (47.9 months) and LORC patients (26.5 months; P = 0.03). There was no significant difference in the surgical or oncological management between age groups (P > 0.05). Mean admissions per 100 days of life was 0.45 in LORC and 0.44 in EORC (P = 0.9119). There was no significant difference in the median proportion of time spent in hospital between EO and LO groups (2.5 vs. 2.2 days for every 100 days of life, P = 0.88).

CONCLUSION

Surgical and oncological treatments were similar for both EORC and LORC groups. The EO group exhibited better survival, with hospitalization burdens comparable for both. These findings underline the importance of maintaining an approach to metastatic RC balancing survival and quality of life.

Global burden and cross-country health inequalities of early-onset colorectal cancer and its risk factors from 1990 to 2021 and its projection until 2036

PURPOSE

To explore the worldwide, regional, and country-specific burden of early-onset colorectal cancer (EO-CRC) and identify its associated risk factors between 1990 and 2021, and to project its incidence and mortality rates for 2036.

METHODS

We acquired data on EO-CRC categorized by gender, socio-demographic index (SDI), and risk factors based on the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Study 2021. Joinpoint regression analysis was utilized to explore the variation in disease burden. The autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model was performed to forecast the disease burden up to 2036.

RESULTS

Globally, the incidence rate, prevalence rate, mortality rate, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) rate of EO-CRC were estimated at 5.37 (95%UI: 4.91 to 5.86)/100,000, 34 (95%UI: 30.96 to 37.35)/100,000, 2.01 (95%UI: 1.84 to 2.19)/100,000, and 101.37 (95%: 92.85 to 110.18)/100,000 in 2021. The prevalence and incidence rates of EO-CRC showed an ascending trajectory, whilst the DALYs and mortality rates demonstrated a downward trajectory between 1990 to 2021. The high-middle SDI regions and East Asia exhibited the highest EO-CRC burden among the five SDI regions and 21 GBD regions respectively. A low-whole-grains diet was the chief risk factor contributing to EO-CRC. It was predicted that the age-standardized rate (ASR) of EO-CRC incidence would increase by 5.56%, while the ASR of mortality would decrease by 13.9% globally until 2036.

CONCLUSION

The current and future global burden of EO-CRC is heavy and varies significantly across different regions and countries.

Five-year overall survival of early- and late-onset colorectal cancer in Medellín, Colombia: a comparative study

PURPOSE

Early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC) (EOCRC, < 50 years) has distinct clinicopathological features from late-onset CRC (LOCRC, ≥ 50 years). However, evidence on survival outcomes is contradictory. We aimed to analyse the differences in 5-year overall survival (OS) between EOCRC and LOCRC.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted during 2018-2022. Individuals aged ≥ 18 years diagnosed with CRC at two hospitals in Medellín, Colombia were included. Clinicopathological and survival data were retrieved from the medical records and a public government database. Patients were categorized into EOCRC and LOCRC groups. Five-year OS rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and prognostic factors for OS were identified through Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Among 1022 patients, 52.5% were female, and 13.5% (n = 138) had EOCRC. Patients with EOCRC showed higher 5-year OS rates than LOCRC patients (54% vs. 32%). Univariable analyses indicated a 37% lower risk of death for EOCRC compared to LOCRC (HR: 0.633, 95%CI: 0.476-0.840, p = 0.002). After multivariable analyses, advanced staging and higher tumour grading were prognostic factors for worse OS (HR: 2.127, 95% CI:1.405-3.220, p = 0.0001; and HR: 12.896, 95%CI: 6.310-26.355, p = 0.000; respectively), and being in the EOCRC group remained as a prognostic factor for higher OS (HR: 0.482, 95% CI: 0.336-0.690, p = 0.000).

CONCLUSION

EOCRC is associated with significantly better 5-year OS rates and prognosis compared to LOCRC. Advanced stage and higher tumour grading are predictors of lower OS among all CRC patients. These findings highlight the importance of age-related risk stratification and personalized therapeutic approaches in CRC.

ESR Essentials: Imaging in colorectal cancer-practice recommendations by ESGAR

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant global health concern. Diagnostic imaging, using different modalities, has a pivotal role in CRC, from early detection (i.e., screening) to follow-up. The role of imaging in CRC screening depends on each country's approach: if an organized screening program is in place, the role of CT colonography (CTC) is limited to the study of either individuals with a positive stool test unwilling/unable to undergo colonoscopy (CC) or in patients with incomplete CC. Although CC is the most common modality to diagnose CRC, CRC can be also incidentally detected during a routine abdominal imaging examination or at the emergency room in patients presenting with intestinal occlusion/subocclusion or perforation. Staging is a crucial aspect of CRC management, guiding treatment decisions and providing valuable prognostic information. An accurate local staging is mandatory in both rectal and colon cancer to drive the appropriate therapeutic workflow. Important limitations of US, CT, and MR in N-staging can be partially solved by FDG PET/CT. Distant staging is usually managed by CT, with MR and FDG PET/CT which can be used as problem-solving techniques. Follow-up is performed according to the general recommendations of the oncological societies. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: It is essential to summarize each phase of colorectal cancer workup, differentiating the management for colon and rectal cancer supported by the main international guidelines and literature data, with the aim to inform the community on the best practice imaging in colorectal cancer. KEY POINTS: • Colorectal cancer is a prevalent disease that lends itself to imaging at each stage of detection and management. • Various imaging modalities can be used as adjuncts to, or in place of, direct visualization methods of screening and are necessary for evaluating metastatic disease. • Reevaluation of follow-up strategies should be considered depending on patients' individual risk of recurrence.

Changing colon cancer screening guidelines to age 45: Has it made a difference?

BACKGROUND

A concerning increase in early-onset colorectal cancer led to guideline changes in 2018 by the American Cancer Society to lower the age for initial colorectal cancer screening from 50 to 45 years of age. Although this would be expected to result in increased screening rates and subsequent earlier detection of colorectal cancer, the effect of this guideline change at a national level is not yet fully understood.

METHODS

Using the National Cancer Database, we identified patients newly targeted for screening (age 45-49 years) diagnosed with colon cancer in either 2017 (early cohort) or 2019 (late cohort). The relationship between time period and stage of disease at presentation was examined by univariate analysis and in a multivariable logistic regression model.

RESULTS

In total, 5,479 patients met inclusion criteria. The median age at diagnosis did not differ between patients in the late and early cohorts (47 years for both cohorts, P = .41). Patients in the late and early cohorts had equal odds of having stage III-IV disease (odds ratio for late cohort to early cohort, 1.05, 95% confidence interval, 0.94-1.17), and patients in the late cohort showed slightly increased odds of having higher T-stage (pT3 or pT4) disease (odds ratio, 1.20, 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.35).

CONCLUSION

Despite recommendations of earlier initial colorectal cancer screening, a clinically meaningful earlier shift in colon cancer stage was not observed in patients newly targeted for screening. Further studies will be needed to assess uptake of these recommendations by providers and patients and identify areas of improvement.

Antibiotic use during radical surgery in stage I-III colorectal cancer: correlation with outcomes?

AIMS

Accumulating evidence indicates that the use of antibiotics (ATBs) in cancer patients is potentially correlated with patient prognosis. Interestingly, the use of these agents is not uncommon in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients during surgery; however, their prognostic value in the clinic has never been addressed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data on ATB use during surgery, including the cumulative defined daily dose (cDDD) and the number of categories, were collected. Differences in the clinical data between the low and high cDDD subgroups and between subgroups with ≤ 4 and >4 categories. Additionally, the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) among these subgroups and the specific categories were compared. Finally, a Cox proportional hazard model was used to validate the risk factors for the outcome.

RESULTS

The number of categories, rather than the cDDD, was a significant predictor of both DFS (P = 0.043) and OS (P = 0.039). Patients with obstruction are more likely to have a high cDDD, whereas older patients are more likely to have multiple categories. There were no significant differences in the DFS (log rank = 1.36, P = 0.244) or OS (log rank = 0.40, P = 0.528) between patients in the low- and high-cDDD subgroups, whereas patients with ≤ 4 categories had superior DFS (log rank = 9.92, P = 0.002) and OS (log rank = 8.30, P = 0.004) compared with those with >4 categories. Specifically, the use of quinolones was harmful to survival (DFS: log rank = 3.67, P = 0.055; OS: log rank = 5.10, P = 0.024), whereas the use of macrolides was beneficial to survival (DFS: log rank = 12.26, P < 0.001; OS: log rank = 9.77, P = 0.002). Finally, the number of categories was identified as an independent risk factor for both DFS (HR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.35-3.11, P = 0.001) and OS (HR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.14-2.90, P = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

The cDDD of ATBs during surgery in stage I-III CRC patients did not correlate with outcome; however, patients in multiple categories or a specific category are likely to have inferior survival. These results suggest that particular caution should be taken when selecting ATBs for these patients in the clinic.

Obesity and early-onset colorectal cancer risk: emerging clinical evidence and biological mechanisms

Early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) is defined as diagnosed at younger than 50 years of age and indicates a health burden globally. Patients with EOCRC have distinct risk factors, clinical characteristics, and molecular pathogenesis compared with older patients with CRC. Further investigations have identified different roles of obesity between EOCRC and late-onset colorectal cancer (LOCRC). Most studies have focused on the clinical characteristics of obesity in EOCRC, therefore, the mechanism involved in the association between obesity and EOCRC remains inconclusive. This review further states that obesity affects the carcinogenesis of EOCRC as well as its development and progression, which may lead to obesity-related metabolic syndrome, intestinal dysbacteriosis, and intestinal inflammation.

The histological and molecular characteristics of early-onset colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC), defined as diagnosis before age 50, has increased in recent decades. Although more often diagnosed at advanced stage, associations with other histological and molecular markers that impact prognosis and treatment remain to be clarified. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis concerning the prevalence of prognostic and predictive tumor markers for early- vs. late-onset CRC, including oncogene mutations, microsatellite instability (MSI), and emerging markers including immune cells and the consensus molecular subtypes.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed for original research articles published between April 2013-January 2024. Included studies compared the prevalence of tumor markers in early- vs. late-onset CRC. A meta-analysis was completed and summary odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained from a random effects model via inverse variance weighting. A sensitivity analysis was completed to restrict the meta-analysis to studies that excluded individuals with Lynch syndrome, a hereditary condition that influences the distribution of tumor markers for early-onset CRC.

Results

In total, 149 articles were identified. Tumors from early-onset CRC are less likely to include mutations in KRAS (OR, 95% CI: 0.91, 0.85-0.98), BRAF (0.63, 0.51-0.78), APC (0.70, 0.58-0.84), and NRAS (0.88, 0.78-1.00) but more likely to include mutations in PTEN (1.68, 1.04-2.73) and TP53 (1.34, 1.24-1.45). After limiting to studies that excluded Lynch syndrome, the associations between early-onset CRC and BRAF (0.77, 0.64-0.92) and APC mutation (0.81, 0.67-0.97) were attenuated, while an inverse association with PIK3CA mutation was also observed (0.88, 0.78-0.99). Early-onset tumors are less likely to develop along the CpG Island Methylator Phenotype pathway (0.24, 0.10-0.57), but more likely to possess adverse histological features including high tumor grade (1.20, 1.15-1.25), and mucinous (1.22, 1.16-1.27) or signet ring histology (2.32, 2.08-2.57). A positive association with MSI status (1.31, 1.11-1.56) was also identified. Associations with immune markers and the consensus molecular subtypes are inconsistent.

Discussion

A lower prevalence of mutations in KRAS and BRAF is consistent with extended survival and superior response to targeted therapies for metastatic disease. Conversely, early-onset CRC is associated with aggressive histological subtypes and TP53 and PTEN mutations, which may serve as therapeutic targets.

Should we perform sigmoidoscopy for colorectal cancer screening in people under 45 years?

BACKGROUND

The strategy for preventing colorectal cancer is screening by colonoscopy, which offers a direct way for detection and removal of adenomatous polyps (APs). American College of Gastroenterology guidelines recommend that people aged ≥ 45 years should undergo colonoscopy; however, how to deal with people aged ≤ 45 years is still unknown.

AIM

To compare the prevalence of APs and high-grade neoplasia between the left and right colon in patients ≤ 45 years.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was conducted at a single tertiary III hospital in China. This study included patients aged 18-45 years with undergoing initial colonoscopy dissection and pathological diagnosis AP or high-grade neoplasia between February 2014 and January 2021. The number of APs in the entire colon while screening and post-polypectomy surveillance in following 1-3 years were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 3053 cases were included. The prevalence of APs in the left and right colon was 55.0% and 41.6%, respectively (OR 1.7, 95%CI 1.6-2.4; P < 0.05). For APs with high-grade neoplasia, the prevalence was 2.7% and 0.9%, respectively (OR 3.0, 95%CI 2.0-4.6; P < 0.05). Therefore, the prevalence of APs and high-grade neoplasia in the left colon was significantly higher than in the right colon in patients aged ≤ 45 years. There were 327 patients who voluntarily participated in post-polypectomy surveillance in following 1-3 years, and APs were found in 216 cases (66.1%); 170 cases had 1-3 polyps (52.0%) and 46 cases had > 3 polyps (14.1%; OR 0.3, 95%CI 0.1-0.6; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that flexible sigmoidoscopy would be an optimal approach for initial screening in people aged ≤ 45 years and would be a more cost-effective and safe strategy.

Increasing Annual Cancer Incidence in Patients Age 20-49 Years: A Real-Data Study

PURPOSE

Data from population-based studies have shown an increased incidence of certain types of neoplasms in patients younger than 50 years (early-onset cancer [EOC]); however, little information is derived from other real-world data sources. In a nonpopulation registry, we analyzed changes in the incidence of several neoplasms in successive generations.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included all patients with a cancer diagnosis registered in one university hospital in Málaga, Spain, between 1998 and 2021, and 18 neoplasms were analyzed. For each neoplasm, the proportion of patients younger than 50 years and age 50 years and older (late-onset cancer [LOC]) of the total number of patients diagnosed each year was determined. In addition, the age limit was lowered to 45-40 years. Changes in these proportions between each year and the following year were assessed by calculating the annual percentage change (APC), and a final assessment of these changes was performed by determining the average APC (AAPC).

RESULTS

Of the 24,596 patients, 5,466 (22.2%) had EOC, and 19,130 (77.8%) had LOC. The incidence of all tumors increased throughout the study period in both age groups. The AAPC increase was higher in patients with EOC than in those with LOC for the following neoplasms: head and neck (6.1% v 4.6%), colon (11.0% v 8.2%), testicular (16.3% v -13.1%), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (8.4% v 5.9%), rectum (16.1% v 6.8%), kidney (27.8% v 20.1%), and sarcoma (43.4% v 28.6%). This increase was confirmed in patients younger than 45 years and 40 years.

CONCLUSION

Our results are consistent with the data published for most tumor sites analyzed. This global public health problem requires the utmost attention to decrease excess cancer in young patients.

Younger patients with colorectal cancer may have better long-term survival after surgery: a retrospective study based on propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

The relationship between postoperative long-term prognosis and age in colorectal cancer patients remains controversial. The purpose of this study based on a Chinese CRC cohort is to determine the disparity in long-term survival outcomes between younger and older colorectal cancer (CRC) patients after surgery using a propensity score matching (PSM).

METHODS

Data for this study was derived from the CRC cohort of the Database from Colorectal Cancer (DACCA) at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2007 to September 2022. The long‑term prognoses were compared between younger and older groups.

RESULTS

A total of 2374 CRC patients were evaluated in this study, including 1039 older patients and 1335 younger ones. After 1:1 ratio PSM, each group contained 784 CRC patients. There was no significant difference in baseline information after PSM (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that younger age was an independent predictor of better overall survival (OS) (p < 0.001, HR = 1.750, 95% CI = 1.407-2.177) and disease-specific survival (DSS) (p < 0.001, HR = 1.718, 95% CI = 1.369-2.157). In terms of different tumor pathological stages after PSM, in comparison to older group, younger group had better OS in stage II (p < 0.001), stage III (p = 0.0085), and stage IV (p = 0.0014) and better DSS in stage II (p = 0.0035), stage III (p = 0.0081), and stage IV (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Younger CRC patients have better prognosis than older CRC patients after surgery, especially, and have better OS and DSS in stages II, III, and IV CRC. Younger CRC patient may gain greater benefit from CRC resection and combined therapy. As for the cut-off age, it may be determined by a specific model suitable for local patients.

Clinical characteristics and prognosis of early-onset cholangiocarcinoma: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the disease of early-onset cholangiocarcinoma (EOC). The primary objective of this study was to compare EOC with later-onset cholangiocarcinoma (LOC) concerning clinical features and survival prognosis.

METHODS

19325 cholangiocarcinoma patients were extracted from 1975 to 2020 in the SEER database. Cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used for the evaluation of cause-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). To reduce confounding, we compared survival differences between the EOC and LOC groups using propensity score matching (PSM).

RESULTS

4037 cholangiocarcinoma patients were included in the study, of which 274 were EOC and 3763 were LOC. Early-onset patients were more likely to be non-white, and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. At diagnosis, patients had advanced AJCC stage, lymph node metastase and distant metastase. The EOC patients were more likely to receive surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy than later-onset patients. Multifactorial COX analysis indicated that EOC patients had lower mortality risk than later-onset patients, and similar results were obtained after PSM; Kaplan-Meier survival curves corroborated that early-onset patients exhibited better OS than later-onset patients, and this survival advantage persisted after PSM. Further subgroup analysis following matching demonstrated that early-onset patients had better OS than later-onset patients in the surgical subgroup, while there were no statistically significant differences in the radiotherapy and chemotherapy subgroups.

CONCLUSION

The EOC patients typically exhibit an intrahepatic presentation and generally experience a more favorable prognosis. Surgery emerged as a critical treatment modality significantly influencing the overall prognosis of EOC.

A competing risk nomogram to predict cancer-specific mortality of patients with late-onset colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics and survival differences between early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) patients and late-onset colorectal cancer (LOCRC) patients, identify the risk factors for cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in LOCRC patients and construct a mortality risk assessment nomogram.

METHODS

CRC patients diagnosed pathologically between 2010 and 2019 in the SEER database were included and divided into the early-onset group and the late-onset group, and the late-onset group was divided into the training and validation sets. The Fine-Gray competing risk model was applied to analyze the prognostic factors of LOCRC patients and establish a competing risk nomogram for CSM.

RESULTS

There are differences in the distribution of multiple clinical features between the early-onset group and the late-onset group. Age, tumor size, histological type, pathological grading, T stage, N stage, M stage, SEER stage, primary tumor surgery, metastatic lesion surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, neural invasion, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were independent influencing factors of the CSM rate in LOCRC patients. The C-index of the prognosis model outweighed 0.8, and the calibration curves fitted the reference line well.

CONCLUSION

The CSM competing risk nomogram for LOCRC patients in this study had acceptable predictive performance that could be applied to the clinic.

Comparison of the short- and long-term prognosis of early-onset colorectal cancer compared with later-onset colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and Aims

The annual incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) is increasing at an alarming rate. The prognosis of EOCRC remains controversial, and whether the early onset is a risk factor for colorectal cancer remains unclear.

Methods

We searched four electronic bibliographic databases from database inception to April 25, 2022 for studies that included both early- and later-onset patients and performed a prognostic analysis. Random-effects models were used to summarize the prognostic information extracted by the investigators, including overall survival (OS), cancer-special survival (CSS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Network meta-analysis (NMA) was used to compare patients' long-term prognoses in different age subgroups.

Results

After 694 reports were screened, 13 studies were included in the final analysis, with a total of 448,781 CRC cases. In the meta-analysis of the 5-year OS, EOCRC had a better prognosis compared to LOCRC (hazard ratio [HR] 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-0.99; relative risk [RR] 0.83, 95% CI, 0.78-0.89). No difference in prognosis was found between the two groups in terms of 5-year CSS (RR 0.99, 95% CI, 0.93-1.05), 5-year DFS (RR 0.90, 95% CI, 0.74-1.09), and short-term OS. In the NMA, patients aged <30 years had the worst outcome (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA], 15.8%) in 5-year OS; consistent results were observed in the analysis of 5-year CSS (<30 years, SUCRA 4.5%), but the difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusion

Although patients with early-onset CRC had better OS than those with later-onset CRC, there was no difference in the CSS. Meanwhile, the trend for survival was worse in younger patients, especially in those ages 18-29 years. Thus, more attention should be paid to early diagnosis and treatment of EOCRC.

Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis Registration

The systematic review and Meta-analysis protocol was registered with PROSPERO (registration number CRD42022334697).

Early-onset locally advanced rectal cancer characteristics, a practical nomogram and risk stratification system: a population-based study

Background

The purpose of this study is to construct a novel and practical nomogram and risk stratification system to accurately predict cancer-specific survival (CSS) of early-onset locally advanced rectal cancer (EO-LARC) patients.

Methods

A total of 2440 patients diagnosed with EO-LARC between 2010 and 2019 were screened from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The pool of potentially eligible patients was randomly divided into two groups: a training cohort (N=1708) and a validation cohort (N=732). The nomogram was developed and calibrated using various methods, including the coherence index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), calibration curves, and decision curves (DCA). A new risk classification system was established based on the nomogram. To compare the performance of this nomogram to that of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system, DCA, net reclassification index (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were employed.

Result

Seven variables were included in the model. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the training cohort was 0.766, 0.736, and 0.731 at 3, 6, and 9 years, respectively. Calibration plots displayed good consistency between actual observations and the nomogram's predictions. The DCA curve further demonstrated the validity of the nomination form in clinical practice. Based on the scores of the nomogram, all patients were divided into a low-risk group, a middle-risk group, and a high-risk group. NRI for the 3-, 6-, and 9-year CSS(training cohort: 0.48, 0.45, 0.52; validation cohort: 0.42, 0.37, 0.37), IDI for the 3-, 6-, and 9-year CSS (training cohort: 0.09, 0.10, 0.11; validation cohort: 0.07, 0.08, 0.08). The Kaplan-Meier curve revealed that the new risk classification system possesses a more extraordinary ability to identify patients in different risk groups than the AJCC staging.

Conclusion

A practical prognostic nomogram and novel risk classification system have been developed to efficiently predict the prognosis of EO-LARC. These tools can serve as a guide to individualize patient treatment and improve clinical decision-making.

Construction and validation of a nomogram of risk factors and cancer-specific survival prognosis for combined lymphatic metastases in patients with early-onset colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the risk and prognostic factors of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in early-onset colorectal cancer (EO-CRC) and to develop nomograms for quantitatively predicting LNM and the cancer-specific survival (CSS).

METHODS

A total of 22,405 EO-CRC patients were included in this study using the SEER database from 2010 to 2017. Logistic and Cox regression were used to identify risk and the potential prognostic factors, respectively, for EO-CRC with LNM. Subsequently, nomograms regarding the risk of LNM in EO-CRC patients and its corresponding CSS were constructed based on these factors. The discriminative ability, calibration and clinical usefulness of the nomograms were assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

T-stage and pathological grade were the most represented factors in the predicted LNM nomogram, while histological type and combined distant metastases were the most represented in the nomogram for CSS in EO-CRC patients with LNM (all P < 0.05). The nomogram constructed based on the prognostic factors screened by Cox regression had good performance with C-index of 0.807 and 0.802 for the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The calibration curve showed that the nomograms' predictions were in line with actual observations. Additionally, the ROC curves indicated good discrimination, and the DCA curves implied significant clinical utility of the nomograms.

CONCLUSION

The nomograms we constructed have significant performance in predicting the incidence and prognosis of LNM in EO-CRC patients, which may help clinicians to make better treatment decision making.

Young-onset colorectal cancer

In the past decades the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in people under the age of 50 years has increased, which is referred to as early-onset CRC or young-onset CRC (YO-CRC). YO-CRC is expected to account for 11% of colon cancers and 23% of rectal cancers by 2030. This trend is observed in different parts of the world and in both men and women. In 20% of patients with YO-CRC, a hereditary cancer syndrome is found as the underlying cause; however, in the majority of patients no genetic predisposition is present. Beginning in the 1950s, major changes in lifestyle such as antibiotic use, low physical activity and obesity have affected the gut microbiome and may be an important factor in YO-CRC development. Owing to a lack of screening, patients with YO-CRC are often diagnosed with advanced-stage disease. Long-term treatment-related complications should be taken into account in these younger patients, making the more traditional sequential approaches of drug therapy not always the most appropriate option. To better understand the underlying mechanism and define relationships between environmental factors and YO-CRC development, long-term prospective studies are needed with lifestyle data collected from childhood.

Early-onset pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: A distinct disease with improved survival compared with old individuals

Background

The incidence, clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival of early-onset pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (EOPanNENs) have not been well explored.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with PanNENs were identified from the SEER database between 2000 and 2018. EOPanNENs were defined as diagnosis in patients aged less than 50 years, while the remaining were defined as later-onset pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (LOPanNENs). Incidence, clinical features, management, and prognosis were analyzed in our study. Multivariable analyses were performed to identify factors associated with overall survival (OS) in EOPanNENs and LOPanNENs, respectively.

Results

A total of 5172 patients with PanNENs were included: 1267 (24.5%) in the EOPanNENs cohort and 3905 (75.5%) in the LOPanNENs cohort. The age-adjusted incidence rate significantly increased among later-onset cases, while it remained relatively stable in early-onset cases. EOPanNENs were more frequently to be female, unmarried, and with better tumor differentiation compared with LOPanNENs. Of note, early-onset patients presented with a higher rate of lymph node involvement, and they were more likely to receive surgical treatment. For local-regional disease at presentation, surgery alone was the most frequently used regimen over the last two decades. With regard to distant stage, a combination of surgery and chemotherapy was more often utilized. Risk factors for PanNENs survival were more correlated with LOPanNENs compared with EOPanNENs. The OS and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were significantly better in the EOPanNENs group. Further analyses showed that EOPanNENs ≤ 2cm were associated with more favorable survival outcomes than EOPanNENs&gt;2cm.

Conclusion

EOPanNENs are a clinically rare and distinct entity from LOPanNENs. The advantages in survival for the EOPanNENs cohort over time were largely driven by the indolent clinical courses including better tumor differentiation and intensified surgical treatment. Further investigations are warranted to better understand the characteristics of this disease subgroup.