Management of drug-resistant chronic hepatitis B

Clinical Manifestations and Laboratory Tests of AECHB and Severe Hepatitis (Liver Failure)

This chapter describes the clinical symptoms and signs of AECHB and HBV ACLF, classification, grading of HBV ACLF and their features, diagnostic principles and standards in liver pathology, biochemistry, and virology of HBV ACLF.

Liver failure is defined as serious damage to the liver cause by a variety of etiologies, leading to liver function disorder or even decompensation, and clinical syndromes with coagulopathy, jaundice, hepatic encephalopathy, and ascites.

Severe hepatitis B can be indicated pathologically by apparent hepatocellular necrosis, including extensive multifocal, confluent, bridging, sub-massive or massive necrosis.

Laboratory tests during the course of severe exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B can reflect pathological changes and liver function in a timely manner, providing objective and informative reference data for evaluation of disease severity and treatment efficacy. Among the most important laboratory tests are those for prothrombin activity, international normalized ratio, and increases in total bilirubin concentration.

Severe hepatitis B is associated with interactions between the virus and host factors. Detection of HBV DNA, HBV genotype, quasispecies and HBV mutation can provide important theoretical bases for the prevention, control or mitigation of the progress of severe hepatitis B.

Noninvasive imaging modalities can be used to visualize the entire liver and parts of it. Measuring liver volume to evaluate liver size and liver reserve capacity is regarded as important in diagnosis, surgical approach and prognostic evaluation of patients with severe exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B and liver failure.

Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) is the first quantitative method developed to assess whether a patient with liver failure requires a liver transplant. The predictive value of the MELD model has been improved by the MELD-Na, iMELD, and MESO models. Several other valuable prognostic models have been developed. For example, for patients with HBV-ACLF, the established TPPM scoring system was found to be more predictive than MELD score.

Management of chronic hepatitis B

Chronic hepatitis B continues to be a major global health burden. It accounts for a substantial impact on health care resources and finances in many parts of the world including Europe. Natural history and disease spectrum are varied, depending on when and how the infection is acquired. The chronic infective state increases patients' risk of progression to liver cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. Several treatment options are currently available, but their use depends on the stage of the patient's infection, which is influenced by both host and viral factors. The ultimate goals in hepatitis B treatment are to prevent disease progression, hepatic decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma, and death. Patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis should be referred to specialized transplant centers in a timely manner.

Comparison of multiplex restriction fragment mass polymorphism and sequencing analyses for detecting entecavir resistance in chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

Drug resistance is a major limitation to the long-term efficacy of controlling chronic hepatitis B (CHB). There is a growing need to analyse multiple mutations associated with drug resistance because sequential or combinational use of antivirals is increasingly being used in treatment. In this study, we introduced a multiplex restriction fragment mass polymorphism (RFMP) assay for detecting mutations conferring entecavir and lamivudine resistance, and compared its performance with direct or clonal sequencing assays.

METHODS

Multiplex PCR was performed with mixed primers designed to interrogate rt184, rt202, rt204 and rt250. The PCR products were digested with restriction enzymes and the resulting fragments were analysed by mass spectrometry. A total of 251 serum samples, taken serially from 45 patients who received entecavir treatment after confirmed diagnosis of lamivudine resistance and inadequate adefovir dipivoxil response, were analysed by the multiplex RFMP assay.

RESULTS

The multiplex RFMP assay correctly identified known viral sequences with sufficient analytical sensitivity to detect as few as 100 IU/ml of HBV and with superior ability to determine haplotypes composed of neighbouring variations. Complex mutational patterns and relative abundances determined by multiplex RFMP assay were in good concordance with results obtained by direct or clonal sequencing analyses. Defined mixtures were successfully and consistently identified at 2% relative concentration of mutant versus wild-type virus by the assay.

CONCLUSIONS

The multiplex RFMP assay is an accurate and sensitive means to detect entecavir and lamivudine resistance mutations, simultaneously. The method is expected to enable early and efficient diagnosis of multiple drug resistance mutations for optimal management of CHB.

Antiviral drug resistance: mechanisms and clinical implications

Antiviral drug resistance is an increasing concern in immunocompromised patient populations, where ongoing viral replication and prolonged drug exposure lead to the selection of resistant strains. Rapid diagnosis of resistance can be made by associating characteristic viral mutations with resistance to various drugs as determined by phenotypic assays. Management of drug resistance includes optimization of host factors and drug delivery, selection of alternative therapies based on knowledge of mechanisms of resistance, and the development of new antivirals. This article discusses drug resistance in herpesviruses and hepatitis B.

Antiviral drug resistance: mechanisms and clinical implications

Antiviral drug resistance is an increasing concern in immunocompromised patient populations, where ongoing viral replication and prolonged drug exposure lead to the selection of resistant strains. Rapid diagnosis of resistance can be made by associating characteristic viral mutations with resistance to various drugs as determined by phenotypic assays. Management of drug resistance includes optimization of host factors and drug delivery, selection of alternative therapies based on knowledge of mechanisms of resistance, and the development of new antivirals. This article discusses drug resistance in herpesviruses and hepatitis B.

Naturally occurring amino-acid substitutions to nucleos(t)ide analogues in treatment naive Turkish patients with chronic hepatitis B

Naturally occurring amino-acid substitutions in the hepatitis B virus (HBV) polymerase gene may be responsible for resistance to nucleoside/nucleotide (NUCs) analogues. To date, only pre-existing lamivudine resistance has been extensively studied. The aim of the present study was to determine the naturally occurring or pre-existing amino-acid substitutions related to NUCs in treatment naive Turkish patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). The investigation involved a total of 88 patients (65 males and 23 females; mean age, 34 years; range, 15-61 years) who were diagnosed with CHB between April 2008 and January 2009. According to HBeAg status, 66 patients were HBeAg-negative and 22 patients were HBeAg positive. Naturally occurring substitutions in the HBV polymerase region were detected by DNA sequencing in 17 (19%) and 30 (34%) patients, based on manual and geno2pheno tool database interpretation, respectively. Each amino-acid substitution appeared alone and included rtA194T, rtV214A, rtQ215S, rtI233V and rtN236T. The median values for viral load, ALT and AST were 3.3 log(10) (2.0-6.0) IU/mL, 36 (12-515) U/L and 27 (13-284) U/L, respectively, but these did not correlate with the observed amino-acid substitutions in the polymerase region. By direct sequencing, genotype D of HBV was found to still be dominant among Turkish patients. In conclusion, every patient who is diagnosed with CHB should be monitored before the start of treatment for more effective management of patient treatment options.

Lamivudine and adefovir resistance in children and young adults with chronic hepatitis B

OBJECTIVE

Long-term lamivudine (LAM) and adefovir (ADV) treatment has been found to induce the emergence of drug-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV) in a significant number of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection. The aim of our study was to evaluate the LAM and ADV mutations detected in our patient group.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-four patients diagnosed with CHB were enrolled in this study. The patient group consisted of those who had received 6 months of treatment with interferon-alpha and who did not response to this therapy. Patients were evaluated based on virologic and serologic response to therapy, and were classified as responders or non-responders. The treatment of non-responders continued with LAM (3mg/kg/d, maximum 100mg/d). Due to a lack of response to treatment, ADV (10mg/g) was added to the treatment regimen of eight young adult patients. The mutations associated with HBV drug resistance were investigated using reverse hybridization methods and PCR.

RESULTS

The mutation studies indicated that 14 (58.4%) of the patients had resistance. Three patients developed ADV-associated mutations (A181T), one after 18 months of ADV; the other two had undergone 18 and 36 months of LAM therapy without ADV exposure. Although the average LAM treatment period of the patients with LAM resistance was longer than for those in whom no resistance was detected, no statistically significant difference was found.

CONCLUSIONS

HBV treatment with nucleoside analogues results in the development of mutant strains, leading to drug resistance. Therefore genotypic resistance testing is important in planning and monitoring HBV treatment.

Prevention and management of drug resistance for antihepatitis B treatment

Emergence of drug resistance in antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B negates treatment benefits. There is a lower chance for emergence of resistance for drugs with rapid and potent viral suppression and a high genetic barrier for resistant mutations. Measurement of viral load at 24 weeks' treatment to aid decision making is mandatory for patients receiving drugs that are associated with a higher resistance rate. Combination treatment with drugs that belong to different groups is associated with a lower chance of resistance. To ensure better control of viral replication in patients with drug resistance, the addition of another drug without an overlapping resistance profile should be given as early as possible, preferably at the time when genotypic resistance emerges. With such strategies, most patients can be maintained in clinical remission. However, because of the mechanism of viral persistence, research efforts should continue to anticipate and prevent the emergence of multidrug-resistant strains.