Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation: What Is the Issue, and How Should It Be Managed?

Hepatitis B virus reactivation in patients treated with monoclonal antibodies

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation poses a significant clinical challenge, especially in patients undergoing immunosuppressive therapies, including monoclonal antibody treatments. This manuscript briefly explores the complex relationship between monoclonal antibody therapy and HBV reactivation, drawing upon current literature and clinical case studies. It delves into the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon, highlighting the importance of risk assessment, monitoring, and prophylactic measures for patients at risk. The manuscript aims to enhance the understanding of HBV reactivation in the context of monoclonal antibody therapy, ultimately facilitating informed clinical decision-making and improved patient care. This paper will also briefly review the definition of HBV activation, assess the risks of reactivation, especially in patients treated with monoclonal antibodies, and consider management for patients with regard to screening, prophylaxis, and treatment. A better understanding of patients at risk can help clinicians provide optimum management to ensure successful patient outcomes and prevent morbidity.

Entecavir: A Review and Considerations for Its Application in Oncology

Entecavir (ETV) is a drug used as a first-line treatment for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) virus infection because it is a guanosine nucleoside analogue with activity against the hepatitis B virus polymerase. The ETV dosage can range from 0.5 mg to 1 mg once a day and the most common side effects include headache, insomnia, fatigue, dizziness, somnolence, vomiting, diarrhea, nausea, dyspepsia, and increased liver enzyme levels. In addition to its conventional use, ETV acts as an inhibitor of lysine-specific demethylase 5B (KDM5B), an enzyme that is overexpressed in breast, lung, skin, liver, and prostate tumors and is involved in the hormonal response, stem cell regeneration, genomic stability, cell proliferation, and differentiation. The KDM5B enzyme acts as a transcriptional repressor in tumor suppressor genes, silencing them, and its overexpression leads to drug resistance in certain tumor types. Furthermore, the literature suggests that KDM5B activates the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway, while reducing KDM5B expression decreases AKT signaling, resulting in decreased tumor cell proliferation. In silico studies have demonstrated that ETV can inhibit tumor cell proliferation and induce apoptosis by reducing KDM5B expression. ETV also appears to inhibit PARP-1, has a high genetic barrier, reducing the chance of resistance development, and can also prevent the reactivation of the hepatitis B virus in cancer patients, which have proven to be significant advantages regarding its use as a repurposed drug in oncology. Therefore, ETV holds promise beyond its original therapeutic indication.

Role of hepatitis B surface antibody in seroreversion of hepatitis B surface antigen in patients achieving hepatitis B surface antigen loss with pegylated interferon-based therapy

It is unclear whether hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) confers clinical benefits after HBsAg seroclearance, especially in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroreversion and maintenance of HBsAb. We evaluated this in patients (n = 222) with HBsAg loss following treatment with pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN)-based therapy who completed a 48-week follow-up period. Serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) markers and biochemical indicators were evaluated every 3 months. The primary endpoint was HBsAg seroreversion. Factors associated with HBsAg seroreversion were also investigated. HBsAb ≥100 mIU/ml resulted in a lower HBsAg seroreversion rate than an HBsAb-negative status (5.5% vs. 29.5%, p < .001); however, the seroreversion rate was not significantly different between patients with HBsAb 10-100 mIU/ml and those in the HBsAb-negative group. Patients with HBsAb ≥100 mIU/ml had a lower HBsAb loss rate than those with HBsAb 10-100 mIU/ml (7.3% vs. 21.7%, p = .005). The final HBsAg seroreversion and HBV DNA relapse rates were 13.5% and 1.8%, respectively. HBsAb ≥100 mIU/ml at the off-treatment time (odds ratio [OR] 0.110, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.034-0.353, p < .001) and treatment time to attain HBsAg loss >28 weeks (OR 2.508, 95% CI: 1.068-5.890, p = .035) were predictors of HBsAg seroreversion. Consolidation therapy for 12-24 weeks resulted in higher HBsAb titres than consolidation therapy for ≤12 weeks in HBsAb-negative patients at the off-treatment time (p < .001). HBsAg seroconversion with HBsAb ≥100 mIU/ml decreases HBsAg seroreversion and provides an efficient maintenance rate of HBsAb. HBsAg seroconversion with high HBsAb titres may be clinically beneficial for chronic hepatitis B treated with PEG-IFN-based therapy.

The Prognostic Value of Serum HBV-RNA during Hepatitis B Virus Infection is Related to Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure

BACKGROUND

Serum HBV-RNA levels can predict antiviral response in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients; however, its role in HBV-related ACLF (HBV-ACLF) remains unclear. Here, we determined its implications for HBV-ACLF.

METHODS

Baseline serum HBV-RNA levels were retrospectively detected in HBV-ACLF and CHB patients. The association of serum HBV-RNA level with clinical outcomes was evaluated by performing multiple logistic regression. A nomogram was developed to formulate an algorithm incorporating serum HBV-RNA for predicting the survival of HBV-ACLF patients. After being discharged from the hospital, the HBV-ACLF patients were followed up for 36 weeks.

RESULTS

In this study, 82 HBV-ACLF patients and 33 CHB patients were included. Serum HBV-RNA levels were significantly higher in CHB patients than in HBV-ACLF patients (4.15 ± 2.63 log10 copies/mL VS 5.37 ± 2.02 log10 copies/mL) (P < 0.05). Among the HBV-ACLF cases, patients with poor outcomes had lower serum HBV-RNA levels, but the difference was not significant. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the serum HBV-RNA inclusive model was 0.745, superior to 0.66 from MELD scores (P < 0.05). During the follow-up for four weeks, the serum HBV-RNA levels, especially in the survival group, were found to be lower than the baseline levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum HBV-RNA levels were associated with disease severity and might predict the long-term clinical outcome of HBV-ACLF patients.

Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation Associated With Therapeutic Interventions

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation associated with various therapeutic interventions is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with current or resolved HBV infection. Because no curative treatment for HBV infection is yet available, there are many individuals at risk for HBV reactivation in the general population. Populations at risk for HBV reactivation include patients who are currently infected with HBV or who have been exposed to HBV in the past. HBV reactivation and its potential consequences is a concern when these populations are exposed to anti-cancer chemotherapy, immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory therapies for the management of various malignancies, rheumatologic diseases, inflammatory bowel disease, or solid-organ or hematologic stem cell transplantation. Accordingly, it has become important to understand the basics of HBV reactivation and the mechanisms by which certain therapies are more susceptible to HBV reactivation. This review aims to raise the awareness of HBV reactivation and to understand the mechanisms and the risks of HBV reactivation in various clinical settings.

Update on the applications and limitations of alpha-fetoprotein for hepatocellular carcinoma

Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is an oncofetal glycoprotein that has been used as a tumor marker for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in combination with ultrasound and other imaging modalities. Its utility is limited because of both low sensitivity and specificity, and discrepancies among the different methods of measurements. Moreover, its accuracy varies according to patient characteristics and the AFP cut-off values used. Combination of AFP with novel biomarkers such as AFP-L3, Golgi specific membrane protein (GP73) and des-gamma-carboxyprothrombin significantly improved its accuracy in detecting HCC. Increased AFP level could also signify severity of hepatic destruction and subsequent regeneration and is commonly observed in patients with acute and chronic liver conditions and cirrhosis. Hereditary and other non-hepatic disorders can also cause AFP elevation.

Gastrointestinal and Liver Manifestations in COVID-19 Population

The coronavirus was first identified as the cause of pneumonia in Wuhan, a town in the Hubei Province of China, in December 2019. It usually has respiratory symptoms such as myalgia, headache, cough, and dyspnea. In the medical literature, digestive symptoms and liver disease have been reported in Coronavirus disease in 2019 (COVID-19) patients. In this review article, we summarized the recent studies of gastrointestinal and hepatic manifestations and management of COVID-19. The most common gastrointestinal symptoms were poor appetite/anorexia, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, and abdominal pain. Elevated aminotransferase has been reported in patients with COVID-19. COVID-19 gastrointestinal and hepatic management is usually symptomatic except for high-risk populations such as patients with inflammatory bowel disease or autoimmune hepatitis, which require special attention.

Prevention of hepatitis B reactivation in patients requiring chemotherapy and immunosuppressive therapy

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation can lead to severe acute hepatic failure and death in patients with HBV infection. HBV reactivation (HBVr) most commonly develops in patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy, especially B cell-depleting agent therapy such as rituximab and ofatumumab for hematological or solid organ malignancies and that receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation without antiviral prophylaxis. In addition, the potential consequences of HBVr is particularly a concern when patients are exposed to either immunosuppressive or biologic therapies for the management of rheumatologic diseases, inflammatory bowel disease and dermatologic diseases. Thus, screening with HBV serological markers and prophylactic or pre-emptive antiviral treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogues should be considered in these patients to diminish the risk of HBVr. This review discusses the clinical manifestation, prognosis and management of HBVr, risk stratifications of cancer chemotherapy and immunosuppressive therapy and international guideline recommendations for the prevention of HBVr in patients with HBV infection and resolved hepatitis B.

Management of hepatitis B virus infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease under immunosuppressive treatment

Hepatitis B remains a significant global clinical problem, despite the implementation of safe and effective vaccination programs. The prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) largely follows the regional epidemiologic status. Serological screening with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), and antibodies to hepatitis B surface (anti-HBs) and core (anti-HBc) proteins is a key element in the management of IBD patients and, ideally, should be performed at IBD diagnosis. Stratification of individual cases should be done according to the serologic profile and the IBD-specific treatment, with particular emphasis in patients receiving immunosuppressive regimens. In patients who have not contracted HBV, vaccination is indicated to accomplish protective immunity. Vaccination in immunosuppressed patients, however, is a challenging issue and several strategies for primary and revaccination have been proposed. The risk of HBV reactivation in patients with IBD should be considered in both HBsAg-positive and HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc-positive patients, when immunosuppressive therapies are administered. HBV reactivation is preventable via the administration of prophylactic nucleot(s)ide analogues and should be the standard approach in HBsAg-positive patients. HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc-positive patients represent a non-homogeneous group and bear a significantly lower risk of HBV reactivation. Biochemical, serological and molecular monitoring is currently the recommended approach for anti-HBc patients. Acute HBV infection is rarely reported in IBD patients. In the present review, we outline the problems associated with HBV infection in patients with IBD and present updated evidence for their management.

Gastroenterology and liver disease during COVID-19 and in anticipation of post-COVID-19 era: Current practice and future directions

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has emerged as a major threat to global public health. The virus causes the clinical syndrome known as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), in which multiple organs can get affected. Apart from manifestations of the respiratory system, which predominate, its clinical presentation is frequently accompanied by symptoms of the gastro-intestinal (GI) tract and liver abnormalities. The correlation of symptoms and abnormalities with disease severity is discussed, leading to ambiguous results from international literature. Moreover, the disease infects patients with co-existing liver and GI disorders affecting both their health status and the availability of healthcare services provided to them. The risk of transmission of the disease during aerosol-generating procedures has changed the diagnostic approach and follow-up algorithms for liver and GI diseases. For the safety of both doctors and patients, telemedicine and distant evaluation have become everyday practice, whereas several routines and emergency visits at outpatient and emergency departments have been postponed or delayed. Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is underway, providing hope to humanity and the expectation that the post-COVID-19 era is near. This review aims to update knowledge about the manifestations of COVID-19 related to liver and GI diseases and the effect of the pandemic on the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for these diseases with a special focus on how current practices have changed and what changes will possibly remain in the future.

Intensive care management of acute-on-chronic liver failure

The syndrome of acute-on-chronic liver failure combines deterioration of liver function in a patient with chronic liver disease, with the development of extrahepatic organ failure and high short-term mortality. Its successful management demands a rapid and coherent response to the development of dysfunction and failure of multiple organ systems in an intensive care unit setting. This response recognises the features that distinguish it from other critical illness and addresses the complex interplay between the precipitating insult, the many organ systems involved and the disordered physiology of underlying chronic liver disease. An evidence base is building to support the approaches currently adopted and outcomes for patients with this condition are improving, but mortality remains unacceptably high. Herein, we review practical considerations in critical care management, as well as discussing key knowledge gaps and areas of controversy that require further focussed research.

Management of Hepatitis-B Virus Infection in Immunocompromised Children: A Single Center Experience

OBJECTIVES

The aims of the study was to expand the pediatric experience on hepatitis-B virus (HBV) reactivation, a known complication in patients with hematologic malignancies or on immunosuppression.

METHODS

Retrospective appraisal of HBV therapy/prophylaxis in immunocompromised children, studied from April 2006 to March 2020.

RESULTS

Eighteen HBV-positive patients, 5 girls, median age 11.1 (4.1--17.9) years were included. Seventeen of 18 were immunosuppressed at HBV-infection diagnosis. Seventeen were at high risk of reactivation, 1 at moderate risk. Five of 18 had acute hepatitis B as first infection or reactivation, 6 had HBeAg-positive infection, 1 an HBeAg-negative infection and 6 HBsAg-negative infection. Median follow-up was 2.7 (0.7--12.5) years. No HBV-related mortality was observed. Prophylaxis had to be repeated in 1. Lamivudine was used in 6/12 viremic patients and HBV-DNA negativization obtained in 2/6 (33%). Tenofovir-DF was used in 2/12 and entecavir in 4/12: 100% attained HBV-DNA negativization. Therapy had to be switched from tenofovir-DF to entecavir in 1 patient because of renal impairment. Virological breakthroughs were observed in 1 lamivudine-treated patient, leading to a hepatitis flare; 1 patient on entecavir had a hepatitis flare at immunoreconstitution. Mortality was 33% in the HBsAg-positive group. Seven prophylactic treatments were administered to 6 patients with HBsAg-negative infection: tenofovir-DF in 2 HBV-DNA-positive, lamivudine in 5 HBV-DNA-negative, without reverse HBsAg seroconversion, morbidity or mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a residual risk of acute hepatitis B in immunocompromised children, mortality rate was substantial, potentially related to the delays in commencing chemotherapy caused by liver dysfunction. Tenofovir-DF or entecavir are the drugs of choice for HBV treatment in immunocompromised children.