Less Satisfaction With Information in Patients With Prostate Cancer Treated With Surgery and Salvage Radiotherapy Compared With Patients Treated With Curative Radiotherapy Alone, Despite Similar Health-Related Quality of Life

Impact of patient information format on the experience of cancer patients treated with radiotherapy

Introduction

Radiotherapy (RT) stands as one of the main cancer treatments. The impact of RT and cancer treatment can have a physical and psychological impact on patients and their carers. To gain patient's trust, and ensure they feel valued, information should be provided before, during, and after RT. Patient and public involvement (PPI) has been lacking, and increased engagement with PPI groups could improve this. This rapid review aims to analyse the literature, and describe and report patient perception, experience, and satisfaction regarding the information received concerning their course of RT.

Methods

To allow the synthesis of results, a pragmatic decision was made to use a rapid review approach to analyse the literature, providing more timely information to inform future work. This rapid review utilised systematic review methods and was conducted according to a pre-defined protocol including clear inclusion criteria (PROSPERO registration: CRD42023415916).Electronic databases CINAHL, AMED, Pubmed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO were searched using a comprehensive search for published studies from January 2012 to November 2023. Two independent reviewers applied the eligibility criteria. Evidence from literature was extracted and transcribed into qualitative data and Braun and Clarke's six-step thematic analysis (TA) was employed to determine themes by one reviewer and checked by a second [26]. Due to the heterogeneity of the included literature, the analysis of this review is presented primarily through narrative synthesis.

Results

Sixty eight articles met the inclusion criteria for this review. Emerging themes included; a desire for information based on patient characteristics, information format, patient preparedness, timing e.g. timing of information and changing priorities over time, health care professional (HCP) involvement, barriers to information, and motivators for better information delivery.

Conclusions

Several factors can influence a patient's desire for information, from whom and when they receive it, to what format they would prefer to receive it. There is benefit to be gained in employing PPI and patient advocacy to inform future studies that aim to further understand the themes that emerged from this review. Such studies can therefore inform HCPs in providing patient-specific information and support by utilising multiple teaching strategies available to them.

Older patients' perceptions of the quality of acute cancer care: An integrative review-A mixed-method approach

AIM

This integrative review aimed to describe the perceptions of the quality of care of older patients (aged 65 and above) living with cancer in acute-care settings.

METHODS

We identified relevant research suitable for inclusion criteria through systematic searches of the PubMed®, EBSCOhost Academic Search Premier®, Scopus® and Web of Science® databases. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework and the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) guidelines were used to conduct the research and report the results. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the modified Critical Skills Appraisal Programme (CASP) checklist.

RESULTS

A total of 24 studies met the inclusion criteria. The data analysis revealed that care quality could be described through three distinct themes: individuality, a sense of security and respectful encounters.

CONCLUSION

The perceptions of older people living with cancer regarding the quality of acute care have not been extensively covered in the literature. Health- and age-related challenges, patients' overall life situation, clear, realistic information about care and the future and respect during encounters should be given attention.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Patient-centred and tailored care, considering the heterogeneity of the population and support for independence, is needed.

Information in radiotherapy for men with localised prostate cancer: An integrative review

INTRODUCTION

Men with prostate cancer may receive radiotherapy as part of their management. They encounter a range of information related to radiotherapy, and a crucial role for therapeutic radiographers and other healthcare practitioners is ensuring patients receive appropriate information related to their treatment. This integrative review aims to identify, synthesise and analyse literature reporting experiences of men with localised prostate cancer related to information in radiotherapy.

METHODS

A systematic literature search encompassing database and hand searches was carried out between February and March 2017 with date limits of 2000-2017 applied. Initially, 4,954 articles were identified. Systematic screening and detailed examination identified that 33 met the inclusion criteria. Data were synthesised and analysed thematically.

RESULTS

Few studies explicitly addressed the issue of information in radiotherapy for men with localised prostate cancer. Themes that emerged and were explored are information needs, information regarding adverse effects, information and time, information preferences, satisfaction with information related to radiotherapy and patient experience related to radiotherapy information.

CONCLUSION

This review suggests that although several aspects related to information for men with localised prostate cancer have been documented, few were explored in detail with respect to radiotherapy indicating that further research in this area is warranted.

Cancer patients' knowledge about their disease and treatment before, during and after treatment: a prospective, longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

Knowledge about disease and treatment is necessary before patients can consent to treatment. One of the few established instruments for evaluating whether sufficient information has been provided, is the EORTC QLQ-INFO25 questionnaire which was developed to measure how patients perceive information. The aim of this study was to investigate whether cancer patients' level of knowledge about their disease and treatment was associated with their perception of and satisfaction with the information.

METHODS

Breast cancer patients referred for adjuvant chemotherapy and prostate cancer patients referred for curative radiotherapy were included. Level of knowledge about their disease and treatment was measured using study-specific questionnaires. Patients' perception of and satisfaction with the received information was assessed using EORTC QLQ-INFO25. Assessments were done before the first consultation with an oncologist (T1), after the consultation (T2) and 8 weeks after start of treatment (T3).

RESULTS

Ninety eight patients were enrolled. Patients with higher education, daily Internet access and in paid employment had the highest baseline knowledge scores. The mean knowledge score increased significantly (T1: 16.4; T2: 20.8; T3: 21.3; p < 0.001.). During the same period, the patients reported on the INFO25 a significant, positive increase in how much information they had received, and that they were more satisfied with the information.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients' knowledge increased significantly during the study period, and they reported that they felt better informed and were more satisfied with the information, suggesting that EORTC QLQ-INFO25 might be used to evaluate cancer patients' level of knowledge about their disease and treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01699672 . Date of registration: September 21, 2012.

Evaluation of health-related quality of life and its main influencing factors in a Polish population of patients with bone metastases

PURPOSE

Regardless of cancer type, the skeleton is one of the most common sites for cancer spread. Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) can be considered a primary endpoint in clinical trials concerning cancer patients with palliative disease. The proper measurement of this endpoint requires valid and reliable instruments. The aim of this study was to evaluate HRQoL and its main influencing factors using validated EORTC tools - the QLQ-C30 and the QLQ-BM22 in Polish population of patients with skeletal metastases.

METHODS

Patients with bone metastases and histologically confirmed malignancy were qualified for the study. They filled out a personal questionnaire, the Polish version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and its supplementary module QLQ-BM22. The influence of numerous socio-clinical factors such as age, gender, working status, level of education, performance status, primary location, and previous treatment received was assessed.

RESULTS

One hundred and ten patients (65 women) were enrolled into this study (mean age ±SD; 57.8±13.8). The most significant HRQoL issues were fatigue (59.29/100); pain (56.97/100) and insomnia (56.36/100). Men coped worse with pain (p=0.013), fatigue (p=0.050), nausea and vomiting (p=0.024) and financial difficulties (p=0.016) than women.

CONCLUSIONS

The main factors influencing HRQoL in Polish patients with bone metastases are fatigue, pain and insomnia, and as such should be a primary focus of patient-centered care in this group.

Do men with prostate cancer and their partners receive the information they need for optimal illness self-management in the immediate post-diagnostic phase?

OBJECTIVE

To (a) determine whether the information provided to men with prostate cancer and their partners in the immediate postdiagnostic phase met their needs; and (b) examine patient and partner satisfaction with the information received.

METHODS

Pre-intervention survey data from a pilot randomized controlled trial of a self-directed coping skills intervention involving 42 patients with prostate cancer, and their partners were collected to examine their psychosocial concerns/needs.

RESULTS

The main concerns for patients and partners were psychosocial in nature such as managing emotions, concern about the future, and losing control. Overall, patients and partners received most information about tests and treatment options. Partners reported receiving significantly less information about support services (P = 0.03) and self-care strategies (P = 0.03) compared to patients. Partners also reported being significantly less satisfied with the information they received (P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Whereas medical information is routinely given, patients and partners may benefit from greater information about psychosocial issues arising from cancer. Despite increased recognition of partner's information needs these still remain unmet.

Association between information provision and decisional conflict in cancer patients

BACKGROUND

In this study, we aimed to identify demographic and clinical variables that correlate with perceived information provision among cancer patients and determine the association of information provision with decisional conflict (DC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We enrolled a total of 625 patients with cancer from two Korean hospitals in 2012. We used the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality-of-life questionnaire (QLQ-INFO26) to assess patients' perception of the information received from their doctors and the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) to assess DC. To identify predictive sociodemographic and clinical variables for adequate information provision, backward selective logistic regression analyses were conducted. In addition, adjusted multivariate logistic regression analyses were carried out to identify clinically meaningful differences of perceived level of information subscales associated with high DC.

RESULTS

More than half of patients with cancer showed insufficient satisfaction with medical information about disease (56%), treatment (73%), other services (83%), and global score (80%). In multiple logistic regression analyses, lower income and education, female, unmarried status, type of cancer with good prognosis, and early stage of treatment process were associated with patients' perception of inadequate information provision. In addition, Information about the medical tests with high DCS values clarity [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 0.54; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30-0.97] and support (aOR, 0.53; 95% CI 0.33-0.85) showed negative significance. For inadequate information perception about treatments and other services, all 5 DCS scales (uncertainty, informed, values clarity, support, and effective decision) were negatively related. Global score of inadequate information provision also showed negative association with high DCS effective decision (aOR, 0.43; 95% CI 0.26-0.71) and DCS uncertainty (aOR, 0.46; 95% CI 0.27-0.77).

CONCLUSION

This study found that inadequate levels of perceived information correlated with several demographic and clinical characteristics. In addition, sufficient perceived information levels may be related to low levels of DC.

Efectos del tipo de tratamiento y grupo de riesgo en la calidad de vida y la información en pacientes con cáncer de próstataEfectos del tipo de tratamiento y grupo de riesgo en la calidad de vida y la información en pacientes con cáncer de próstata

Objetivo: Comprobar las diferencias en la calidad de vida y la información de los pacientes con cáncer de próstata según el tratamiento y grupo de riesgo, y valorar su asociación con las variables sociodemográficas y clínicas. Metodo: entre 2015-2016, 176 hombres con cáncer de próstata seleccionados aleatoriamente, que habían recibido tratamientos locales, hormonales o combinados fueron evaluados mediante entrevista y los cuestionarios EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-PR25 y EORTC QLQ-INFO25. Resultados: La calidad de vida estaba más deteriorada en las escalas física, de rol, social y sexual en el grupo de riesgo avanzado y los tratados con hormonoterapia. La prostatectomía era la que producía más problemas urinarios, y los tratamientos combinados mayor sintomatología hormonal. Los tratados con radioterapia consideraban la información más útil y se sentían más informados sobre la enfermedad, pruebas médicas y tratamientos que los que recibían tratamiento hormonal y estaban más satisfechos que los intervenidos con prostatectomía. Los mayores o con estudios básicos recibieron menos información y la consideraron menos útil. Conclusiones: La calidad de vida es satisfactoria y la sintomatología baja. Los hombres en riesgo avanzado y/o los que reciben hormonoterapia presentan mayor déficit en la calidad de vida. La información es deficitaria, sobre todo en los hombres con problemas urinarios y con peor calidad de vida. Hay poca o ninguna información en las áreas “otros servicios”, “lugares de cuidado” y “pautas de autocuidado”. Es necesario evaluar y tratar a los hombres más vulnerables. Además de formar en información al personal sanitario.