Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Large Primary Renal Cell Carcinoma

Evaluation of Volumetric Response Assessment From SABR for Renal Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE

SABR is increasingly used to treat renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, the optimal method to assess treatment response is unclear. We aimed to quantify changes in both volume and maximum linear size of tumors after SABR and evaluate the utility of the 2 approaches in treatment response assessment.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively studied patients with RCC treated with SABR at our institution between 2013 and 2020. All available follow-up computed tomography scans were aligned, and tumors were contoured on all scans. Volume and maximum linear size were measured at each follow-up, relative to these measurements at the time of computed tomography simulation.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients with 25 tumors were included. Median follow-up was 32 months (range, 16-67). Nineteen tumors (76%) had 30% volumetric response at a median time of 7 months after SABR, and 12 tumors (48%) had 30% decrease in maximum linear size at a median time of 16 months. Eighteen tumors (72%) decreased in volume on first follow-up scan and continued to shrink, and 5 tumors (20%) displayed transient growth after SABR (average 24% increase in volume). Compared with T1a tumors, T1b or larger tumors were more likely to have transient growth (8% vs 33%; P = .16) and had higher average relative volume 24 months after SABR (0.47 vs 0.8; P = .022).

CONCLUSIONS

Volume measurement results in more pronounced and earlier change compared with linear size measurement when assessing response to SABR. These findings may provide guidance when assessing treatment response for patients with RCC treated with SABR.

Dose-response of localized renal cell carcinoma after stereotactic body radiation therapy: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SBRT) is an emerging treatment option for primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC), particularly in patients who are unsuitable for surgery. The aim of this review is to assess the effect of increasing the biologically equivalent dose (BED) via various radiation fractionation regimens on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for studies published up to October 2023. Studies reporting on patients with localized RCC receiving SBRT were included to determine its effectiveness on local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival. A random effects model was used to meta-regress clinical outcomes relative to the BED for each study and heterogeneity was assessed by I2.

RESULTS

A total of 724 patients with RCC from 22 studies were included, with a mean age of 72.7 years (range: 44.0-81.0). Local control was excellent with an estimate of 99 % (95 %CI: 97-100 %, I2 = 19 %), 98 % (95 %CI: 96-99 %, I2 = 8 %), and 94 % (95 %CI: 90-97 %, I2 = 11 %) at one year, two years, and five years respectively. No definitive association between increasing BED and local control, progression-free survival and overall survival was observed. No publication bias was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant dose response relationship between oncological outcomes and was not identified, and excellent local control outcomes were observed at the full range of doses. Until new evidence points otherwise, we support current recommendations against routine dose escalation beyond 25-26 Gy in one fraction or 42-48 Gy in three fractions, and to consider de-escalation or compromising target coverage if required to achieve safe organ at risk doses.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for inoperable patients with renal carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to analyze the dose-dependent safety profiles of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with inoperable small renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

MATERIAL

This is a retrospective study from a single institution including patients with RCC treated between 2011 and 2020 with SBRT on the primary tumor or on a local recurrence after surgery. All patients had been declared inoperable or refused surgery. The patients were divided into two dose level groups: group 1 (BED10<60Gy) and group 2 (BED10≥60Gy). Acute and late toxicities, renal function and local control (LC) were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 24 patients were analyzed with an average follow-up of 25.1 months. Nine patients (37%) and three patients (14%) reported grade 1-2 acute and late toxicities, respectively. No grade≥3 acute and late toxicities were observed. There was no significant difference in acute and late toxicities between the two groups (P=0.21 and P=0.27, respectively). There was no significant difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate in the 15 patients, eligible for renal toxicity analysis between the pre-radiation and the 12-month follow-up (P=0.1) and the last follow-up (P=0.06). LC at the last follow-up was noted in 19 out of 23 patients (83%) and was based on imaging acquisition. LC was 77.8% for group 1 and 85.7% for group 2 (P=1.95).

CONCLUSION

Dose escalation was not associated with an increase in acute and late grade≥2 toxicities. There appears to be a trend towards increased LC at higher doses.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for primary renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and practice guideline from the International Society of Stereotactic Radiosurgery (ISRS)

Surgery is the standard of care for patients with primary renal cell carcinoma. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a novel alternative for patients who are medically inoperable, technically high risk, or who decline surgery. Evidence for using SBRT in the primary renal cell carcinoma setting is growing, including several rigorously conducted prospective clinical trials. This systematic review was performed to assess the safety and efficacy of SBRT for primary renal cell carcinoma. Review results then formed the basis for the practice guidelines described, on behalf of the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society. 3972 publications were screened and 36 studies (822 patients) were included in the analysis. Median local control rate was 94·1% (range 70·0-100), 5-year progression-free survival was 80·5% (95% CI 72-92), and 5-year overall survival was 77·2% (95% CI 65-89). These practice guidelines addressed four key clinical questions. First, the optimal dose fractionation was 25-26 Gy in one fraction, or 42-48 Gy in three fractions for larger tumours. Second, routine post-treatment biopsy is not recommended as it is not predictive of patient outcome. Third, SBRT for primary renal cell carcinoma in a solitary kidney is safe and effective. Finally, guidelines for post-treatment follow-up are described, which include cross-axial imaging of the abdomen including both kidneys, adrenals, and surveillance of the chest initially every 6 months. This systematic review and practice guideline support the practice of SBRT for primary renal cell carcinoma as a safe and effective standard treatment option. Randomised trials with surgery and invasive ablative therapies are needed to further define best practice.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy to the kidney for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A narrative review of an emerging concept

This narrative review provides a historical overview of cytoreductive nephrectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and examines the safety and therapeutic potential of cytoreductive stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for mRCC in the modern immunotherapy era. In the last five years, the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of mRCC has improved outcomes for patients. This has brought forth new exploration of the role of CN in combination with immunotherapy. Early retrospective evidence suggests that there may be a benefit of deferred CN after immunotherapy (IOT) for de novo mRCC patients. However, there has also been concern regarding the feasibility of surgery after IOT due to inflammation. SBRT may be an appropriate alternative in these circumstances. Since 1999, cytoreductive SBRT has been used for inoperable primary RCC. Several prospective and retrospective studies treating the kidney tumor for localized RCC have shown that this technique is safe and produces favorable and durable local control. SBRT has also exhibited similar effectiveness to CN, while providing additional benefits including noninvasiveness and the ability to treat tumors that can't be treated with nephrectomy or ablation due to size or location. Furthermore, SBRT confers immunostimulatory effects, which are hypothesized to work synergistically with immunotherapy. Clinicians should consider SBRT a safe and reliable alternative to CN for RCC patients. Ongoing studies are exploring the utility of SBRT for treatment of the primary tumor in mRCC patients receiving standard of care immunotherapy.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Localized Kidney Cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is increasingly utilized in the management of localized kidney cancers, particularly for patients who are not surgical candidates. Herein, we provide a narrative review of SBRT in the management of localized kidney cancers.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent prospective studies and multi-institutional retrospective studies highlight the safety and efficacy of SBRT in the management of renal tumors, a disease previously thought to be radioresistant. Studies have shown that local control is greater than 90% with rare grade 3 or 4 toxicity and no grade 5 toxicity. SBRT can be utilized successfully in the treatment of large kidney tumors (> 5 cm). New techniques such as MRI-guided radiation therapy may further improve the therapeutic ratio. However, randomized clinical trials are necessary to confirm the optimal dosing schedule and compare outcomes with nephrectomy, which remains the standard of care in suitable patients. Advances in SBRT have made this modality a safe and effective treatment option in the management of localized kidney cancers.

Imaging considerations for thermal and radiotherapy ablation of primary and metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Ablative (percutaneous and stereotactic) thermal and radiotherapy procedures for management of both primary and metastatic renal cell carcinoma are increasing in popularity in clinical practice. Data suggest comparable efficacy with lower cost and morbidity compared to nephrectomy. Ablative therapies may be used alone or in conjunction with surgery or chemotherapy for treatment of primary tumor and metastatic disease. Imaging plays a crucial role in pre-treatment selection and planning of ablation, intra-procedural guidance, evaluation for complications, short- and long-term post-procedural surveillance of disease, and treatment response. Treatment response and disease recurrence may differ considerably after ablation, particularly for stereotactic radiotherapy, when compared to conventional surgical and chemotherapies. This article reviews the current and emerging role of imaging for ablative therapy of renal cell carcinoma.

Role of Imaging in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multidisciplinary Perspective

With the expansion in cross-sectional imaging over the past few decades, there has been an increase in the number of incidentally detected renal masses and an increase in the incidence of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs). The complete characterization of an indeterminate renal mass on CT or MR images is challenging, and the authors provide a critical review of the best imaging methods and essential, important, and optional reporting elements used to describe the indeterminate renal mass. While surgical staging remains the standard of care for RCC, the role of renal mass CT or MRI in staging RCC is reviewed, specifically with reference to areas that may be overlooked at imaging such as detection of invasion through the renal capsule or perirenal (Gerota) fascia. Treatment options for localized RCC are expanding, and a multidisciplinary group of experts presents an overview of the role of advanced medical imaging in surgery, percutaneous ablation, transarterial embolization, active surveillance, and stereotactic body radiation therapy. Finally, the arsenal of treatments for advanced renal cancer continues to grow to improve response to therapy while limiting treatment side effects. Imaging findings are important in deciding the best treatment options and to monitor response to therapy. However, evaluating response has increased in complexity. The unique imaging findings associated with antiangiogenic targeted therapy and immunotherapy are discussed. An invited commentary by Remer is available online. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2021.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Palliation of Hematuria Arising From Urothelial Carcinoma of the Kidney in Unfavorable Surgical Candidates

INTRODUCTION

Hematuria can be a distressing and debilitating complication of urothelial carcinoma (UC) of the kidney for patients who are not candidates for surgery or ureteroscopic ablation. We retrospectively assessed the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for controlling gross hematuria in this patient population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved review of the records, laboratory values, pathology, and imaging of 8 consecutive patients treated with SBRT over a 5-year period for uncontrolled gross hematuria caused by UC of the renal pelvis or calyces.

RESULTS

Therapy was delivered in 3 to 5 treatments over 1 to weeks. Individual treatments lasted an average of 17.2 minutes. No patient experienced treatment-related pain, vomiting, or diarrhea. All enjoyed cessation of bleeding within a week of completing therapy. Hematuria recurred in 2 patients in 4 and 22 months. Of the patients who have not re-bled, 3 expired of metastatic disease or co-morbidities, and 3 remain alive up to 6 years posttreatment. Of patients who have survived longer than a year, creatinine has changed by -0.05 to +0.35, and estimated glomerular filtration rate has fallen by an average of 22%. No patient has required dialysis.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT appears to be an effective and well-tolerated means of palliating gross hematuria secondary to UC of the renal pelvis or calyces in patients who are unfavorable candidates for nephrectomy or ureteroscopic ablation. Treatment was associated with a moderate decline in renal function.

Extending hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy to tumours larger than 70cc - effects and side effects

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for tumours ≥5 cm is poorly studied and its utility and feasibility is uncertain. We here report the Karolinska experience of SBRT in this setting.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All patients had a gross tumour volume (GTV) ≥70 cc, a prescribed physical dose of at least 40 Gy and received treatment between 1995-2012.

RESULTS

We included 164 patients with 175 tumours located in the thorax (n = 86), the liver (n = 27) and the abdomen (n = 62) and treated with a median prescribed dose (BED_α/β 10Gy) of 80 Gy (71.4-113). One- and 2- year local control rates were 82% and 61%. In multivariate analyses, minimum dose to the GTV and histological subtype were associated with local control. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) histology showed the most favourable local control - 94% at 2 years for all histologies. Thirty-seven patients experienced grade 3-5 toxicity most likely related to SBRT. Seven of the ten patients with grade 5 toxicity, had a centrally located tumour in the thorax.

CONCLUSION

SBRT of tumours >5 cm in diameter may be an option for peripherally located lung and abdominal tumours. Histological origin and tumour location should be considered before treatment.

The Role of Daily Adaptive Stereotactic MR-Guided Radiotherapy for Renal Cell Cancer

Simple Summary

Standard treatment for localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is surgery. Stereotactic radiotherapy given in a few high dose fractions is a promising treatment for this indication and could be an alternative option for patients unsuitable for surgery. Stereotactic MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) is clinically implemented as a new technique for precise treatment delivery of abdominal tumors, like RCC. In this study, we evaluated the clinical impact of stereotactic MRgRT given in five fractions of 8 Gy and routine plan re-optimization for 36 patients with large primary RCCs. Our evaluation showed good oncological results with minimal side-effects. Even in this group with large tumors, daily plan re-optimization was only needed in a minority of patients who can be identified upfront. This is a favorable result since online MRgRT plan adaptation is a time-consuming procedure. In these patients, MRgRT delivery will be faster, and these patients could be candidates for even less fractions per treatment.

Abstract

Novel magnetic-resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) permits real-time soft-tissue visualization, respiratory-gated delivery with minimal safety margins, and time-consuming daily plan re-optimisation. We report on early clinical outcomes of MRgRT and routine plan re-optimization for large primary renal cell cancer (RCC). Thirty-six patients were treated with MRgRT in 40 Gy/5 fractions. Prior to each fraction, re-contouring of tumor and normal organs on a pretreatment MR-scan allowed daily plan re-optimization. Treatment-induced toxicity and radiological responses were scored, which was followed by an offline analysis to evaluate the need for such daily re-optimization in 180 fractions. Mean age and tumor diameter were 78.1 years and 5.6 cm, respectively. All patients completed MRgRT with an average fraction duration of 45 min. Local control (LC) and overall survival rates at one year were 95.2% and 91.2%. No grade ≥3 toxicity was reported. Plans without re-optimization met institutional radiotherapy constraints in 83.9% of 180 fractions. Thus, daily plan re-optimization was required for only a minority of patients, who can be identified upfront by a higher volume of normal organs receiving 25 Gy in baseline plans. In conclusion, stereotactic MRgRT for large primary RCC showed low toxicity and high LC, while daily plan re-optimization was required only in a minority of patients.

Radiation Therapy for Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

Stereotactic radiosurgery and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) have led to a resurgence of the use of radiotherapy in the management of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). These techniques provide excellent local control and palliation of metastatic sites of disease with minimal toxicity. Additionally, SBRT to the primary tumor may be efficacious and well tolerated in select patients that are not surgical candidates. Emerging data suggest that SBRT may potentiate the immune response, and current and future study will evaluate if SBRT can improve survival outcomes in patients with metastatic RCC.

Survey of current practices from an international task force for gynecological stereotactic ablative radiotherapy

Background

Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) is an effective treatment that improves local control for many tumours. However, the role of SABR in gynecological cancers (GYN) has not been well-established. We hypothesize that there exists considerable variation in GYN-SABR practice and technique. The goal of this study is to describe clinical and technical factors in utilization of GYN-SABR among 11 experienced radiation oncologists.

Materials and methods

A 63 question survey on GYN-SABR was sent to 11 radiation oncologists (5 countries) who have published original research, conducted trials or have an established program at their institutions. Responses were combined and analyzed at a central institution.

Results

Most respondents indicated that salvage therapy (non-irradiated or re-irradiated field) for nodal (81%) and primary recurrent disease (91%) could be considered standard options for SABR in the setting of inability to administer brachytherapy. All other indications should be considered on clinical trials. Most would not offer SABR as a boost in primary treatment off-trial without absolute contraindications to brachytherapy. Multi-modality imaging is often (91%) used for planning including PET, CT contrast and MRI. There is a wide variation for OAR tolerances however small bowel is considered the dose-limiting structure for most experts (91%). Fractionation schedules range from 3 to 6 fractions for nodal/primary definitive and boost SABR.

Conclusions

Although SABR has become increasingly standard in other oncology disease sites, there remains a wide variation in both clinical and technical factors when treating GYN cancers. Nodal and recurrent disease is considered a potential indication for SABR whereas other indications should be offered on clinical trials. This study summarizes SABR practices among GYN radiation oncologists while further studies are needed to establish consensus guidelines for GYN-SABR treatment.