1
|
Matson M, Tien T, Yardy G, Allchorne P, Green JSA. The Use of Hospital Services by Patients With Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer in the Last Year of Life: Identifying the Areas to Improve Care. Cureus 2023; 15:e49175. [PMID: 38130562 PMCID: PMC10734556 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.49175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is associated with significant morbidity. However, patients' specific health needs have not been well defined. This study analyses the utilisation of hospital resources by MIBC patients in the 12 months before death, informing healthcare modelling and enabling service redesign to improve their quality of life. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients who died after being diagnosed with MIBC at a single hospital in the United Kingdom within four years were included. Patients' electronic health records were reviewed to collect data on all interactions with hospital services in their last year of life. RESULTS A total of 41 patients were included, with survival times ranging from one to 88 months (with a median of nine months). In the last year of life, a patient from this cohort had an average of 5.2 outpatient appointments and 2.3 emergency admissions leading to 17.1 days of inpatient stay and 1.3 operations/procedures. The most common reasons for emergency admission were for the management of haematuria (23%), urinary tract infection (23%), or chest infection (12%). CONCLUSION Patients with MIBC demonstrate significant utilisation of healthcare resources in their last year of life. An awareness of this should inform honest discussions with patients, earlier provision of palliative care, and proactive management of haematuria and urinary tract infections to improve care in this important stage of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monty Matson
- Department of Urology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, GBR
| | - Tony Tien
- Department of Urology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, GBR
| | - George Yardy
- Department of Urology, East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Colchester, GBR
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abuhasanein S, Jahnson S, Aljabery F, Gårdmark T, Jerlström T, Liedberg F, Sherif A, Ströck V, Kjölhede H. Standardized care pathways for patients with suspected urinary bladder cancer: the Swedish experience. Scand J Urol 2022; 56:227-232. [PMID: 35389306 DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2022.2058605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare time intervals to diagnosis and treatment, tumor characteristics, and management in patients with primary urinary bladder cancer, diagnosed before and after the implementation of a standardized care pathway (SCP) in Sweden. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data from the Swedish National Register of Urinary Bladder Cancer was studied before (2011-2015) and after (2016-2019) SCP. Data about time from referral to transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT), patients and tumor characteristics, and management were analyzed. Subgroup analyses were performed for cT1 and cT2-4 tumors. RESULTS Out of 26,795 patients, median time to TURBT decreased from 37 to 27 days after the implementation of SCP. While the proportion of cT2-T4 tumors decreased slightly (22-21%, p < 0.001), this change was not stable over time and the proportions cN + and cM1 remained unchanged. In the subgroups with cT1 and cT2-4 tumors, the median time to TURBT decreased and the proportions of patients discussed at a multidisciplinary team conference (MDTC) increased after SCP. In neither of these subgroups was a change in the proportions of cN + and cM1 observed, while treatment according to guidelines increased after SCP in the cT1 group. CONCLUSION After the implementation of SCP, time from referral to TURBT decreased and the proportion of patients discussed at MDTC increased, although not at the levels recommended by guidelines. Thus, our findings point to the need for measures to increase adherence to SCP recommendations and to guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suleiman Abuhasanein
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Urology Section, NU Hospital Group, Trollhättan, Sweden
| | - Staffan Jahnson
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Urology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Firas Aljabery
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Urology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Truls Gårdmark
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tomas Jerlström
- Department of Urology, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Fredrik Liedberg
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.,Institution of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Amir Sherif
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Viveka Ströck
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.,Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Göteborg, Sweden
| | - Henrik Kjölhede
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.,Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Göteborg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sui W, Hall ME, Barocas DA, Chang SS, Luckenbaugh AN, Moses KA, Penson DF, Wallis CJD, Laviana AA. Association Between Surgical Volume and Survival Among Patients With Variant Histologies of Bladder Cancer. Urology 2021; 159:100-106. [PMID: 34606878 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Revised: 08/14/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the relationship between hospital volume and the management of bladder cancer variant histology. Variant histologies of bladder cancer are rare which limits the ability for providers to develop expertise however there is a clear hospital and/or surgeon-volume relationship for management of rare or complex surgical and/or medical diseases. METHODS We queried the National Cancer Database from 2004-2016 for all cases of bladder cancer, identifying cases of variant histology. Our primary outcome was overall survival while secondary outcomes included identifying treatment patterns. Hospitals were stratified into those that managed ≤2, >2-4, >4-6, and ≥6 cases per year of variant histology. RESULTS We identified 23,284 patients with bladder cancer of variant histology who were treated at 1301 hospitals. Few institutions had high volume experience with this disease: 18.5% (n = 241) treated >2 patients annually and 5.7% (n = 76) treated >4 cases annually. Hospital volume positively correlated with utilization of early radical cystectomy (RC) in non-muscle invasive disease and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in muscle-invasive disease. On multivariable analysis, increased hospital volume was associated with improved survival. After stratifying by sub-type, hospital volume continued to be associated with improved survival for squamous, small cell, and sarcomatoid cancers. CONCLUSION Management of variant histology urothelial carcinoma at high-volume centers is associated with improved overall survival. The mechanisms of this are multifactorial, and future research should focus on improvement opportunities for low-volume hospitals, centralization of care, and/or increased access to care at high-volume centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wilson Sui
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Mary E Hall
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Daniel A Barocas
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Sam S Chang
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Amy N Luckenbaugh
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Kelvin A Moses
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - David F Penson
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | | | - Aaron A Laviana
- Department of Surgery & Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School at the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dellis A, Zakopoulou R, Kougioumtzopoulou A, Tzannis K, Koutsoukos K, Fragkoulis C, Kostouros E, Papatsoris A, Varkarakis I, Stravodimos K, Boutati E, Pagoni S, Seferlis M, Chrisofos M, Kouloulias V, Ntoumas K, Deliveliotis C, Constantinides C, Dimopoulos MA, Bamias A. Referral for "Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy" for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer to a Multidisciplinary Board: Patterns, Management and Outcomes. Cancer Manag Res 2021; 13:5941-5955. [PMID: 34354376 PMCID: PMC8331106 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s317500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of muscle invasive bladder cancer in everyday practice differs from that of clinical trials. We describe the patterns of referral for “neoadjuvant chemotherapy”, treatment and outcomes in a multidisciplinary tumor board. Methods This was an observational study. Patients referred for neoadjuvant chemotherapy received 4 cycles of dose-dense gemcitabine/cisplatin and were then assessed for definitive local therapy. Patients had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Primary objective was a 3-year disease-free survival rate. Results Forty-six patients (clinical stages II: 28, IIIA: 9, IIIB: 4, IVA: 3, missing: 2) were included. Following chemotherapy, 30 underwent radical cystectomy, 8 radiotherapy and 8 no further therapy. Pathological downstaging was observed in 14 (46.6%) of the 30 patients who underwent radical cystectomy; clinical TNM staging was correlated with disease-free survival in the whole population, while clinical and pathological stages, as well as pathological downstaging, were correlated with disease-free survival in patients undergoing radical cystectomy. Three-year disease-free survival rates for the whole cohort and for patients undergoing radical cystectomy were 67.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 51–79.2) and 65.2 (95% CI: 44.9–79.6), respectively. Conclusion Real-world muscle invasive bladder cancer patients who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy are characterized by more advanced diseases and less frequent radical surgery than those included in clinical trials. Nevertheless, outcomes were comparable and, therefore, offering patients with stage II–IVA muscle invasive bladder cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy after assessment by multidisciplinary tumor boards should be strongly encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athanasios Dellis
- 2nd Department of Surgery, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Aretaieion University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Roubini Zakopoulou
- Oncology Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Andromahi Kougioumtzopoulou
- Radiotherapy Unit, 2nd Department of Radiology, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Kimon Tzannis
- Oncology Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Koutsoukos
- Oncology Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Efthymios Kostouros
- 3rd Department of Internal Medicine, General Hospital of Athens "G. Gennimatas", Athens, Greece
| | - Athanasios Papatsoris
- 2nd Department of Urology, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanoglio Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Ioannis Varkarakis
- 2nd Department of Urology, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanoglio Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Stravodimos
- First Department of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Laiko" General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Eleni Boutati
- 2nd Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Stamata Pagoni
- 3rd Department of Internal Medicine, General Hospital of Athens "G. Gennimatas", Athens, Greece
| | | | - Michael Chrisofos
- 3rd Department of Urology, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Vasilios Kouloulias
- Radiotherapy Unit, 2nd Department of Radiology, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Ntoumas
- Department of Urology, General Hospital of Athens "G. Gennimatas", Athens, Greece
| | - Charalambos Deliveliotis
- 2nd Department of Urology, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanoglio Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Constantine Constantinides
- First Department of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Laiko" General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Meletios A Dimopoulos
- Oncology Unit, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Aristotelis Bamias
- 2nd Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shepherd C, Cookson M, Shore N. The Growth of Integrated Care Models in Urology. Urol Clin North Am 2021; 48:223-232. [PMID: 33795056 DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2020.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
With heightened awareness of health care outcomes and efficiencies and reimbursement-based metrics, it is ever more important that urologists consider the effects of integrated care models on physicians/staff/clinics fulfillment and patient outcomes, and whether and how to optimally implement these models within their unique practice settings. Despite growing evidence that integrating care improves outcomes, uncertainty persists regarding which approach is most efficient and achievable in terms of specialty considerations and financial resources. In this article, we discuss strategies for integrating urologic care and its impact on current and future health care delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin Shepherd
- University of Oklahoma, 920 Stanton L. Young Boulevard, WP 2140, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.
| | - Michael Cookson
- Department of Urology, University of Oklahoma, 920 Stanton L. Young Boulevard, WP 2140, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Neal Shore
- CPI, Carolina Research Center, 823 82nd Parkway, Myrtle Beach, SC 29572, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Collaboration Between Oncology Social Workers and Nurses: A Patient-Centered Interdisciplinary Model of Bladder Cancer Care. Semin Oncol Nurs 2021; 37:151114. [PMID: 33431236 DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2020.151114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We propose a bladder cancer patient-centered, interdisciplinary collaboration model of care adapted from an earlier model by Black, Dornan, and Allegrante (1986). The Bladder Patient-Centered Interdisciplinary Team (BPIT) model provides a conceptual foundation for assembling interdisciplinary teams and emphasizes the patient as an active participant in treatment and member of the care team, along with oncology nurses, wound ostomy and continence nurses, and oncology social workers. DATA SOURCES This model integrates scopes of practice and practice standards from nursing and social work professional organizations, findings from peer-reviewed articles, and expert clinical opinion in conceptualizing interdisciplinary bladder cancer care. CONCLUSION BPIT is not meant to be an exhaustive or proscriptive catalog of roles and responsibilities. Future research is needed in this area to further refine and delineate the oncology social worker and nursing scopes of practice and standards for collaborative teamwork. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE The unmet supportive care needs of patients with bladder cancer across all phases of the cancer continuum are well documented. Oncology and wound ostomy and continence nurses are of critical importance to holistically addressing these needs and enhancing the health-related quality of life. The BPIT model provides a broad overview of the discipline-specific and interdisciplinary team-specific roles and responsibilities for bladder cancer care.
Collapse
|
7
|
Aly A, Johnson C, Doleh Y, Shenolikar R, Botteman MF, Hussain A. Medical oncology referral and systemic therapy of patients with advanced stage urothelial carcinoma. J Comp Eff Res 2020; 9:945-957. [PMID: 32964721 DOI: 10.2217/cer-2020-0093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: To understand physician visit patterns among patients with stage IV (including nonmetastatic [M0] and metastatic [M1] disease) urothelial carcinoma (UC) and understand factors associated with a timely referral to a medical oncologist and systemic treatment. Patients & methods: Retrospective analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare data. Results: First physician encounter was with a urologist (M0: 69%; M1: 53%) or primary care physician ([PCP]; M0: 19%, M1: 25%) for the majority of patients around UC diagnosis. After the index urologist encounter, most patients had a subsequent medical oncologist visit at a median of 52 days (M0: 69.5 days, M1: 33 days). In an adjusted model, older age, index PCP visit, higher comorbidities and M0 disease were negatively associated with a medical oncologist referral. Among those referred to a medical oncologist, older age, Hispanic or non-Hispanic Black race and not being married were negatively associated with subsequent chemotherapy receipt (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Many patients with advanced UC encounter multiple specialists during their disease course. Older patients or those with a first UC-related encounter with a PCP are less likely to be referred to medical oncology. Once referred to medical oncology, social determinants, including race and marital status, are relevant predictors of receiving chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdalla Aly
- AstraZeneca, 200 Orchard Ridge Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20878, USA
| | - Courtney Johnson
- Pharmerit International, 4350 East-West Hwy, Suite 1110, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Yunes Doleh
- AstraZeneca, 200 Orchard Ridge Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20878, USA
| | - Rahul Shenolikar
- AstraZeneca, 200 Orchard Ridge Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20878, USA
| | - Marc F Botteman
- Pharmerit International, 4350 East-West Hwy, Suite 1110, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Arif Hussain
- Marlene & Stewart Greenbaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.,Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.,Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Marinaro J, Zeymo A, Egan J, Carvalho F, Krasnow R, Stamatakis L, Lynch J, Hwang J, Williams S, Kowalczyk K. Sex and Racial Disparities in the Treatment and Outcomes of Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer. Urology 2020; 151:154-162. [PMID: 32810481 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.06.087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2020] [Revised: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 06/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify racial and sex disparities in the treatment and outcomes of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) using a nationwide oncology outcomes database. METHODS Using the National Cancer Database, we identified patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer from 2004 to 2014. Treatments analyzed included no treatment, cystectomy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus cystectomy ("optimal treatment"), cystectomy plus adjuvant chemotherapy, and chemoradiation. Propensity matching compared mortality outcomes between sexes. Logistic models evaluated predictors of receiving optimal treatment, as well as mortality. RESULTS Forty seven thousand two hundred and twenty nine patients were identified. Most patients were male (73.4%) and underwent cystectomy alone (69.0%). Propensity score matching demonstrated increased 90-day mortality in women vs men (13.0% vs 11.6%, P = .009), despite adjusting for differences in treatments between sexes. Logistic regression models showed no difference in receipt of optimal treatment between sexes (odds ratio [OR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-1.22) although black patients were less likely to receive optimal treatment (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.05-0.48). Logistic regression models confirmed increased 90-day mortality in female (OR 1.17, CI 1.08-1.27, P < .001) and black (OR 1.29, CI 1.11-1.50, P = .001) patients. Females had a lower overall survival on Cox regression analysis (Hazard Ratio 0.92, 95% CI 0.87-0.97). CONCLUSION While there do not appear to be significant treatment disparities between sexes, women experience higher 90-day mortality and lower overall survival. Black patients are less likely to receive optimal treatment and have a higher risk of 90-day mortality. Additional research is needed to determine the variables leading to worse outcomes in females and identify impediments to black patients receiving optimal treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Marinaro
- MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Department of Urology, Washington, DC.
| | | | - Jillian Egan
- MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Department of Urology, Washington, DC
| | - Filipe Carvalho
- MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Department of Urology, Washington, DC
| | - Ross Krasnow
- MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Department of Urology, Washington, DC
| | - Lambros Stamatakis
- MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Department of Urology, Washington, DC
| | - John Lynch
- MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Department of Urology, Washington, DC
| | - Jonathan Hwang
- MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Department of Urology, Washington, DC
| | - Stephen Williams
- Division of Urology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX
| | - Keith Kowalczyk
- MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Department of Urology, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Leow JJ, Catto JWF, Efstathiou JA, Gore JL, Hussein AA, Shariat SF, Smith AB, Weizer AZ, Wirth M, Witjes JA, Trinh QD. Quality Indicators for Bladder Cancer Services: A Collaborative Review. Eur Urol 2020; 78:43-59. [PMID: 31563501 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2019] [Accepted: 09/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT There is a lack of accepted consensus on what should constitute appropriate quality-of-care indicators for bladder cancer. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the optimal management of bladder cancer and propose quality indicators (QIs). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic review was performed to identify literature on current optimal management and potential quality indicators for both non-muscle-invasive (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive (MIBC) bladder cancer. A panel of experts was convened to select a recommended list of QIs. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS For NMIBC, preoperative QIs include tobacco cessation counselling and appropriate imaging before initial transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT). Intraoperative QIs include administration of antibiotics, proper safe conduct of TURBT using a checklist, and performing restaging TURBT with biopsy of the prostatic urethra in appropriate cases. Postoperative QIs include appropriate receipt of perioperative adjuvant therapy, risk-stratified surveillance, and appropriate decision to change therapy when indicated (eg, bacillus Calmette-Guerin [BCG] unresponsive). For MIBC, preoperative QIs include multidisciplinary care, selection for candidates for continent urinary diversion, receipt of neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy, time to commencing radical treatment, consideration of trimodal therapy as a bladder-sparing alternative in select patients, preoperative counselling with stoma marking, surgical volume of radical cystectomy, and enhanced recovery after surgery protocols. Intraoperative QIs include adequacy of lymphadenectomy, blood loss, and operative time. Postoperative QIs include prospective standardised monitoring of morbidity and mortality, negative surgical margins for pT2 disease, appropriate surveillance after primary treatment, and adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in appropriate cases. Participation in clinical trials was highlighted as an important component indicating high quality of care. CONCLUSIONS We propose a set of QIs for both NMIBC and MIBC based on established clinical guidelines and the available literature. Although there is currently a lack of level 1 evidence for the benefit of implementing these QIs, we believe that the measurement of these QIs could aid in the improvement and benchmarking of optimal care for bladder cancer. PATIENT SUMMARY After a systematic review of existing guidelines and literature, a panel of experts has recommended a set of quality indicators that can help providers and patients measure and strive towards optimal outcomes for bladder cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey J Leow
- Department of Urology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore; Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - James W F Catto
- Academic Urology Unit, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Jason A Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ahmed A Hussein
- Department of Urology, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Departments of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Angela B Smith
- Department of Urology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, UNC-Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Alon Z Weizer
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Manfred Wirth
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - J Alfred Witjes
- Department of Urology, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Diamantopoulos LN, Winters BR, Grivas P, Ngo SD, Zeng J, Hsieh AC, Gore JL, Liao JJ, Yu EY, Schade GR, Psutka SP, Schweizer MT, Lee JH, Dighe M, Lin DW, Cheng HH, Daya J, Tretiakova MS, True LD, Russell KJ, Vakar-Lopez F, Montgomery RB, Wright JL. Bladder Cancer Multidisciplinary Clinic (BCMC) Model Influences Disease Assessment and Impacts Treatment Recommendations. Bladder Cancer 2019. [DOI: 10.3233/blc-190239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Leonidas N. Diamantopoulos
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Brian R. Winters
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Petros Grivas
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA, USA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Steven D. Ngo
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jing Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Andrew C. Hsieh
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA, USA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - John L. Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jay J. Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Evan Y. Yu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA, USA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - George R. Schade
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Sarah P. Psutka
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Michael T. Schweizer
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA, USA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jean H. Lee
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Manjiri Dighe
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Daniel W. Lin
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Heather H. Cheng
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA, USA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Joanna Daya
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Maria S. Tretiakova
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Lawrence D. True
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kenneth J. Russell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Funda Vakar-Lopez
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Robert B. Montgomery
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA, USA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jonathan L. Wright
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Aragon-Ching JB, Choudhury A, Margulis V, Yu EY. Formidable Scenarios in Urothelial and Variant Cancers of the Urinary Tract. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2019; 39:262-275. [PMID: 31099661 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_237451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in the field of bladder and upper tract cancers provide opportunities for multidisciplinary care. Urothelial cancers make up the majority of the histologic subtype of bladder and upper tract cancers. Although the existence of variant histology, nonurothelial cancers, and urethral cancers is rare, these cancers pose a challenging clinical dilemma given the lack of well-defined consensus treatment guidelines. This review focuses on key issues of treatment: cisplatin ineligibility with emphasis on the definition, nuances of chemotherapy and frontline immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, use of radiation in bladder-preservation strategies, upper tract urothelial cancer management, and highlights of urothelial variants and nonurothelial tumors and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- 2 The Christie National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- 3 The Univeristy of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Evan Y Yu
- 4 University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Safeguarding Autonomy of Patients With Bladder Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 103:81-83. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.07.2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2018] [Revised: 07/15/2018] [Accepted: 07/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
13
|
Chen YW, Ornstein MC, Wood LS, Allman KD, Martin A, Beach J, Gilligan T, Garcia JA, Rini BI. The association between facility case volume and overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the targeted therapy era. Urol Oncol 2018; 36:470.e19-470.e29. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2018] [Revised: 05/27/2018] [Accepted: 06/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|