Validation of the IMDC Prognostic Model in Patients With Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma Treated With First-Line Axitinib: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index as a Predictor of Prognosis in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Nivolumab

BACKGROUND

The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) has been reported as a screening tool to assess the nutrition-related risk with mortality in older patients and those with the various diseases. However, the prognostic value of GNRI in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients receiving nivolumab therapy remains unclear.

METHODS

Fifty-six consecutive patients with mRCC receiving nivolumab between September 2013 and August 2020 at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. The survival outcomes and prognostic factors associated with overall survival (OS) were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirteen and forty-three patients were classified with low (GNRI < 92) and high (GNRI ≥ 92) GNRI, respectively. Patients with low GNRI demonstrated significantly shorter OS (P = 0.0002) than those with high GNRI. In multivariate analysis, GNRI at the time of nivolumab (P = 0.008) was extracted as the predictor for OS in addition to Karnofsky performance status (KPS) (P = 0.016). Integration of the GNRI into the International Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer Database Consortium (IMDC) risk classification improved the c-index from 0.761 to 0.833 (combination of GNRI with IMDC risk classification) and to 0.778 (substitution of GNRI with KPS in IMDC risk classification).

CONCLUSIONS

GNRI was a significant prognostic biomarker in mRCC patients receiving nivolumab.

Clinical impact of early response to first-line VEGFR-TKI in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma on survival: A multi-institutional retrospective study

It remains unknown whether the early response to vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFR-TKI) management in malignancies links to long-term survival. The objective of this study was to investigate the survival rates and predictive factors of early response in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) managed by VEGFR-TKIs. From Jan. 2008 to Oct. 2018, 496 patients were treated with VEGFR-TKIs as first-line treatment at the eight Japanese hospitals (Michinoku RCC). Early cessation was defined as VEGFR-TKIs being given up within 3 months after their initiation. The number of patients in early cessation VEGFR-TKIs (Cohort I) was 173 (34.9%), and in long-term use (Cohort II) was 323 (65.1%). The cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were better in Cohort II. IMDC Poor-risk was at risk of early cessation of a first-line VEGFR-TKI. Axitinib was the most preferred drug for long-term treatment. On closer examination, both Cohort I and II were divided into two groups, the patients ceased VEGFR-TKI due to adverse events (Group A [67 from Cohort I] and Group C [51 from Cohort II]) and disease progression (Group B [106 from Cohort I] and Group D [272 from Cohort II]). Despite that the cessation was adverse events, CSS and OS in Group A were worse than both Group C and D. Axitinib was administered with the safer profile. IMDC Poor risk was the risk factor for the early disease progression. Managing early adverse events may contribute to a better prognosis in mRCC patients treated VEGFR-TKIs.

A Study of Pazopanib Safety and Efficacy in Patients With Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and ECOG Performance Status 2 (Pazo2): An Open label, Multicentre, Single Arm, Phase II Trial

AIM

Patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma and poor performance status (PS≥2) are often deemed unsuitable for treatment. The Pazo2 trial aimed to assess tolerability and efficacy of pazopanib as first-line treatment in renal cancer patients with ECOG PS2.

METHODS

Pazo2 was a prospective, single arm, open label, multicentre, phase II trial, conducted in 26 UK centres. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years, with advanced or metastatic renal cancer and a clear cell component (aRCC), measurable disease as per RECIST Criteria 1.1, and ECOG PS2. Co-primary outcomes, assessed at 6-months after patients entered the trial, were tolerability, defined as the proportion of patients who did not develop "intolerable" adverse events, and efficacy, defined as the proportion of all patients who were progression-free and alive.

RESULTS

Between February 21, 2013 and August 12, 2016, 75 patients were registered. Median age was 68.6 years (IQR 64.6-76.0), 100% ECOG PS2, 62.7% 'poor risk' (International Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium). Of the 65 evaluable patients, 70.8% (95% CI: 58.8, 80.4) did not develop "intolerable" adverse events and 56.9% (95% CI: 44.8, 68.2) were still alive and progression-free 6 months after starting pazopanib. Twenty-seven patients developed serious adverse events deemed to be related to pazopanib.

CONCLUSION

These data suggests that pazopanib is tolerated and effective in aRCC patients with PS2 and represents a treatment option for patients who cannot receive or tolerate immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Interactive Data Visualization Tool for Patient-Centered Decision Making in Kidney Cancer

PURPOSE

Patients and providers often lack clinical decision tools to enable effective shared decision making. This is especially true in the rapidly changing therapeutic landscape of metastatic kidney cancer. Using the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria, a validated risk prediction tool for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, we created and user-tested a novel interactive visualization for clinical use.

METHODS

An interactive visualization depicting IMDC criteria was created, with the final version including data for more than 4,500 patients. Usability testing was performed with nonmedical lay-users and medical oncology fellow physicians. Subjects used the tool to calculate median survival times based on IMDC criteria. User confidence was surveyed. An iterative user feedback implementation cycle was completed and informed revision of the tool.

RESULTS

The tool is available at CloViz-IMDC. Initially, 400 lay-users and 15 physicians completed clinical scenarios and surveys. Cumulative accuracy across scenarios was higher for physicians than lay-users (84% v 74%; P = .03). Eighty-three percent of lay-users and 87% of physicians thought the tool became intuitive with use. Sixty-eight percent of lay-users wanted to use the tool clinically compared with 87% of physicians. After revisions, the updated tool was user-tested with 100 lay-users and 15 physicians. Physicians, but not lay-users, showed significant improvement in accuracy in the updated version of the tool (90% v 67%; P = .008). Seventy-two percent of lay-users and 93% of physicians wanted to use the updated tool in a clinical setting.

CONCLUSION

A graphical method of interacting with a validated nomogram provides prognosis results that can be used by nonmedical lay-users and physicians, and has the potential for expanded use across many clinical conditions.

Outcomes of axitinib versus sunitinib as first-line therapy to patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the immune-oncology era

Although combination immune checkpoint inhibitor (immuno‐oncology [IO]) therapy is the first‐line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), it mostly causes resistance and tumor regrowth. Therefore, an optimal second‐line therapy is necessary. Such therapy typically comprises vascular endothelial growth factor receptor‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR‐TKIs). This study was aimed at comparing the efficacy of two TKIs—axitinib and sunitinib—in mRCC patients. From January 2008 to October 2018, we registered 703 mRCC patients from 8 Japanese institutes. Of these, 408 patients received axitinib or sunitinib as the first‐line treatment. Thereafter, efficacy and survival rate were compared between the axitinib and sunitinib groups. To reduce the effects of selection bias and potential confounders, propensity score matching analysis was performed. Axitinib and sunitinib were administered in 274 and 134 patients, respectively. More than 25% of the patients received nivolumab sequence therapy. To calculate the propensity scores for each patient, we performed multivariate logistic regression analysis. The objective response rate, progression‐free survival (PFS), cause‐specific survival, and overall survival (OS) were significantly better in the axitinib group than in the sunitinib group. Furthermore, the OS was better in the nivolumab‐treated patients in the axitinib group. Axitinib showed higher efficacy and afforded greater survival benefits than did sunitinib when administered as first‐line therapy in mRCC patients. Thus, from among VEGFR‐TKIs, axitinib might be a possible option for application in the middle of IO drug‐based treatment sequences.

Comparative effectiveness of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors according to IMDC risk groups in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis

Aim: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combinations have become the new standard of primary systemic treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients. We performed a meta-analysis aimed at evaluating ICIs plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) combinations across International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk groups. Materials & methods: All the relevant randomized clinical trials were retrieved through Cochrane library, PubMed/Med and EMBASE; three Phase III randomized clinical trials were included. Results: ICI-TKI combinations significantly decreased the risk of death in IMDC poor- and intermediate-risk patients. Conversely, a nonstatistically significant benefit was observed in favorable-risk patients. Conclusion: Our results suggest that IMDC poor-risk patients benefit most from ICI-TKI combinations, while a proportion of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients could respond to targeted agent monotherapy.

First-line axitinib therapy is less effective in metastatic renal cell carcinoma with spindle histology

Axitinib, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, will be used in combination first-line therapies against metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), but its effects as a first-line monotherapy are unclear. Thus, we aimed to elucidate pretreatment clinical factors that predict the prognosis of patients with mRCC receiving first-line axitinib therapy. We enrolled 63 patients with mRCC treated with axitinib as first-line therapy between Nov. 2003 and Jul. 2018. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using the Wald χ² statistic in Cox proportional hazards regression. Median patient age was 67 (range: 25-85) years. Seven (11.1%) patients were classified as being at favorable risk, 33 (52.4%) at intermediate risk, and 23 (36.5%) at poor risk according to the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk classification system. Median follow-up duration after axitinib initiation was 14 (range: 1-72) months. Median PFS and OS were 18 months and 65 months, respectively. Cox regression analyses of clinical predictors revealed that high C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were significantly correlated with shorter PFS [hazard ratio (HR), 1.63; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-4.0)], whereas spindle cells and poor IMDC risk scores were related to worse OS (HR, 2.87 and 2.88, respectively; 95% CI 1.4-11.0 and 1.1-8.5, respectively). Thus, patients with mRCC and spindle histology or poor IMDC risk scores had worse OS, and those with high CRP levels had shorter PFS in first-line axitinib treatment. Other therapies might be more suitable for initial management of such patients.

Efficacy and safety of nivolumab for renal cell carcinoma in patients over 75 years old from multiple Japanese institutes

PURPOSE

Despite nivolumab being increasingly used for treating metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), differing findings have been reported about its efficacy and safety in elderly patients. Thus, this study was aimed at evaluating nivolumab's efficacy and safety for treating mRCC in Japanese patients aged ≥ 75 years.

METHODS

From March 2013 to August 2019, 118 mRCC patients (89 men and 29 women) were treated with nivolumab. The objective response rates (ORRs) were compared between patients aged ≥ 75 and < 75 years. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were also compared between the two age-groups.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration after nivolumab initiation was 10 months. At the time of nivolumab initiation, 22 and 96 patients were aged ≥ 75 and < 75 years, respectively. Intergroup differences in patient characteristics except for age were not significant. Furthermore, intergroup differences in ORR (14 vs 23%; P = 0.367), PFS (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.37-1.51; P = 0.414), and median OS (HR 1.29, 95% CI 0.68-2.46; P = 0.433) were not significant. The incidence of nivolumab discontinuation due to AEs was significantly higher in the ≥ 75 years group (27% vs 7%; P = 0.028), although the intergroup difference in the AE incidence rate was not significant (55% vs 43.8%; P = 0.535).

CONCLUSIONS

Nivolumab's effectiveness was comparable between the two patient groups, except for early AE-related discontinuation in the ≥ 75 year group.