T-cell responses in osteosarcoma patients vaccinated with an anti-idiotypic antibody, 105AD7, mimicking CD55

Managing the immune microenvironment of osteosarcoma: the outlook for osteosarcoma treatment

Osteosarcoma, with poor survival after metastasis, is considered the most common primary bone cancer in adolescents. Notwithstanding the efforts of researchers, its five-year survival rate has only shown limited improvement, suggesting that existing therapeutic strategies are insufficient to meet clinical needs. Notably, immunotherapy has shown certain advantages over traditional tumor treatments in inhibiting metastasis. Therefore, managing the immune microenvironment in osteosarcoma can provide novel and valuable insight into the multifaceted mechanisms underlying the heterogeneity and progression of the disease. Additionally, given the advances in nanomedicine, there exist many advanced nanoplatforms for enhanced osteosarcoma immunotherapy with satisfactory physiochemical characteristics. Here, we review the classification, characteristics, and functions of the key components of the immune microenvironment in osteosarcoma. This review also emphasizes the application, progress, and prospects of osteosarcoma immunotherapy and discusses several nanomedicine-based options to enhance the efficiency of osteosarcoma treatment. Furthermore, we examine the disadvantages of standard treatments and present future perspectives for osteosarcoma immunotherapy.

A novel immune cell signature for predicting osteosarcoma prognosis and guiding therapy

Dysregulation of immune cell infiltration in the tumor microenvironment contributes to the progression of osteosarcoma (OS). In the present study, we explored genes related to immune cell infiltration and constructed a risk model to predict the prognosis of and guide therapeutic strategies for OS. The gene expression profile of OS was obtained from TARGET and Gene Expression Omnibus, which were set as the discovery and verification cohorts. CIBERSORT and Kaplan survival analyses were used to analyze the effects of immune cells on the overall survival rates of OS in the discovery cohort. Differentially expressed gene (DEG) analysis and protein–protein interaction (PPI) networks were used to analyze genes associated with immune cell infiltration. Cox regression analysis was used to select key genes to construct a risk model that classified OS tissues into high- and low-risk groups. The prognostic value of the risk model for survival and metastasis was analyzed by Kaplan–Meier survival analyses, receiver operating characteristic curves, and immunohistochemical experiments. Immunological characteristics and response effects of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy in OS tissues were analyzed using the ESTIMATE and Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion algorithms, while sensitivity for both targeted and chemotherapy drugs was analyzed using the OncoPredict algorithm. It was demonstrated that the high infiltration of resting dendritic cells in OS tissues was associated with poor prognosis. A total of 225 DEGs were found between the high- and low-infiltration groups of OS tissues, while 94 genes interacted with others. Through COX analyses, among these 94 genes, four genes (including AOC3, CDK6, COL22A1, and RNASE6) were used to construct a risk model. This risk model showed a remarkable prognostic value for survival rates and metastasis in both the discovery and verification cohorts. Even though a high microsatellite instability score was observed in the high-risk group, the ICB response in the high-risk group was poor. Furthermore, using OncoPredict, we found that the high-risk group OS tissues were resistant to seven drugs and sensitive to 25 drugs. Therefore, our study indicates that the resting dendritic cell signature constructed by AOC3, CDK6, COL22A1, and RNASE6 may contribute to predicting osteosarcoma prognosis and thus therapy guidance.

GD2 or HER2 targeting T cell engaging bispecific antibodies to treat osteosarcoma

BACKGROUND

The cure rate for metastatic osteosarcoma has not substantially improved over the past decades. Clinical trials of anti-HER2 trastuzumab or anti-GD2 dinutuximab for metastatic or refractory osteosarcoma were not successful, and neither was immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

METHODS

We tested various target antigen expressions on osteosarcoma cell lines using flow cytometry and analyzed in vitro T cell engaging BsAb (T-BsAb)-dependent T cell-mediated cytotoxicity using 4-h ⁵¹Cr release assay. We tested in vivo anti-tumor activities of T-BsAb targeting GD2 or HER2 in established osteosarcoma cell line or patient-derived xenograft (PDX) mouse models carried out in BALB-Rag2^-/-IL-2R-γc-KO (BRG) mice. We also generated ex vivo BsAb-armed T cells (EATs) and studied their tumor-suppressive effect against osteosarcoma xenografts. In order to improve the anti-tumor response, ICIs, anti-human PD-1 (pembrolizumab) or anti-human PD-L1 (atezolizumab) antibodies were tested their synergy with GD2- or HER2-BsAb against osteosarcoma.

RESULTS

GD2 and HER2 were chosen from a panel of surface markers on osteosarcoma cell lines and PDXs. Anti-GD2 BsAb or anti-HER2 BsAb exerted potent anti-tumor effect against osteosarcoma tumors in vitro and in vivo. T cells armed with anti-GD2-BsAb (GD2-EATs) or anti-HER2-BsAb (HER2-EATs) showed significant anti-tumor activities as well. Anti-PD-L1 combination treatment enhanced BsAb-armed T cell function in vivo and improved tumor control and survival of the mice, when given sequentially and continuously.

CONCLUSION

Anti-GD2 and anti-HER2 BsAbs were effective in controlling osteosarcoma. These data support the clinical investigation of GD2 and HER2 targeted T-BsAb treatment in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors, particularly anti-PD-L1, in patients with osteosarcoma to improve their treatment outcome.

Osteosarcoma: A comprehensive review of management and treatment strategies

Osteosarcoma, a bone cancer usually seen in children and young adults, is generally a high-grade malignancy presented by extreme metastases to the lungs. Osteosarcoma has a tendency for appearing in bones with rapid growth rate. The etiology of osteosarcoma is multifaceted and poorly understood. A molecular consideration of this disease will lead to a directed tumor treatment. The present treatment for osteosarcoma comprises of an arrangement of systemic chemotherapy and wide surgical resection. Survival rate is increased by the progress of destructive systemic chemotherapies. So, the development of new treatment approaches for metastatic osteosarcoma is essential. Immunomodulation has been used in clinical settings. Through targeting surface antigens expressed on tumor cells, particular antibodies and exploitation of cellular immunotherapy against sarcomas have been confirmed to be effective as cancer therapeutics. In this article, we have reviewed epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of osteosarcoma and we have focused on different methods of immunotherapy including vaccines, cell-based immunotherapy, cytokines, and monoclonal antibodies.

The future of immunotherapy for sarcoma

INTRODUCTION

The use of immunotherapeutic challenges for sarcoma has a long history. Despite the existence of objective responses, immunotherapy has been overshadowed by the results of chemotherapy, especially for osteosarcoma. However, the prognosis for non-responders to chemotherapy is still poor and immunotherapy is now focused on again.

AREAS COVERED

We reviewed the following types of clinical trials of immunotherapy for sarcoma: (i) vaccination with autologous tumor cells, (ii) vaccination with peptides derived from tumor-associated antigens, (iii) adoptive cell transfer using engineered T cells expressing T cell receptor directed at NY-ESO-1 and (iv) immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting CTLA-4 and PD1/PDL1.

EXPERT OPINION

The immunogenicity of sarcoma might be lower than that of melanoma. Patients with small lesions who have not received any chemotherapy are good candidates for peptide-based immunotherapy. Combining peptide vaccination and immune checkpoint inhibitors is an attractive option, and long-lived memory T cells are attracting attention. Memory T stem cells defined by CD95+ are long-lived and have the capacity for self-renewal and multidifferentiation. We also identified a novel memory T cell population, young memory T cells defined by CD73+CXCR3+. Regulation of such memory T stem cells will be useful for peptide vaccination and adoptive cell transfer.

The promise of the anti-idiotype concept

A basic tenet of antibody-based immunity is their specificity to antigenic determinates from foreign pathogen products to abnormal cellular components such as in cancer. However, an antibody has the potential to bind to more than one determinate, be it an antigen or another antibody. These observations led to the idiotype network theory (INT) to explain immune regulation, which has wax and waned in enthusiasm over the years. A truer measure of the impact of the INT is in terms of the ideas that now form the mainstay of immunological research and whose roots are spawned from the promise of the anti-idiotype concept. Among the applications of the INT is understanding the structural implications of the antibody-mediated network that has the potential for innovation in terms of rational design of reagents with biological, chemical, and pharmaceutical applications that underlies concepts of reverse immunology which is highlighted herein.

Idiotypes as immunogens: facing the challenge of inducing strong therapeutic immune responses against the variable region of immunoglobulins

Idiotype (Id)-based immunotherapy has been exploited as cancer treatment option. Conceived as therapy for malignancies bearing idiotypic antigens, it has been also extended to solid tumors because of the capacity of anti-idiotypic antibodies to mimic Id-unrelated antigens. In both these two settings, efforts are being made to overcome the poor immune responsiveness often experienced when using self immunoglobulins as immunogens. Despite bearing a unique gene combination, and thus particular epitopes, it is normally difficult to stimulate the immune response against antibody variable regions. Different strategies are currently used to strengthen Id immunogenicity, such as concomitant use of immune-stimulating molecules, design of Id-containing immunogenic recombinant proteins, specific targeting of relevant immune cells, and genetic immunization. This review focuses on the role of anti-Id vaccination in cancer management and on the current developments used to foster anti-idiotypic B and T cell responses.

Racotumomab: an anti-idiotype vaccine related to N-glycolyl-containing gangliosides - preclinical and clinical data

Neu-glycolyl (NeuGc)-containing gangliosides are attractive targets for immunotherapy with anti-idiotype mAbs, because these glycolipids are not normal components of the cytoplasmic membrane in humans, but their expression has been demonstrated in several human malignant tumors. Racotumomab is an anti-idiotype mAb specific to P3 mAb, an antibody which reacts to NeuGc-containing gangliosides, sulfatides, and other antigens expressed in tumors. Preparations containing racotumomab were able to induce a strong anti-metastatic effect in tumor-bearing mice. Different Phase I clinical trials have been conducted in patients with advanced melanoma, breast cancer, and lung cancer. The results of these clinical trials demonstrated the low toxicity and the high immunogenicity of this vaccine. The induced antibodies recognized and directly killed tumor cells expressing NeuGcGM3. A Phase II/III multicenter, controlled, randomized, double blind clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the effect of aluminum hydroxide-precipitated racotumomab vaccine in overall survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. The clinical results of this study showed a significant clinical benefit in the patients who were treated with the anti-idiotype vaccine.

Using monoclonal antibodies to stimulate antitumor cellular immunity

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have an established role in current cancer therapy with seven approved for the treatment of a wide variety of tumors. The approved mAbs directly target tumor cells; however, it is becoming increasingly clear that as well as their direct effects, these mAbs can present antigens to the immune system. This stimulates long-lasting T-cell immunity, which may correlate with long-term survival. A more direct approach is to use mAbs to target antigens directly to antigen-presenting cells. One approach, ImmunoBody, which has just entered the clinic, stimulates antitumor immunity using mAbs genetically engineered to express tumor-specific T-cell epitopes. T cells not only respond via their T-cell receptors recognizing T-cell epitopes presented on MHC but are also influenced by stimulation of a wide variety of costimulatory molecules. mAbs targeting these molecules can also influence antitumor immunity. The main protagonist in this class of mAbs is ipilimumab, which has recently been shown to improve survival at 2 years in 23% of advanced melanoma patients. Combinations of mAbs targeting tumor antigens to activated antigen-presenting cells and mAbs targeting costimulatory receptors may provide effective therapy for a broad range of tumors.

Immunotherapeutic Intervention against Sarcomas

Advances in systemic therapy for sarcoma have produced, over the last two decades, relatively short-term benefits for the majority of patient. Among the novel biologic therapeutics that will likely increase our ability to cure human cancer in the years to come, immunotherapy is one of the most promising approaches. While past attempts to use immunotherapy have failed to dramatically shift the paradigm of care for the treatment of patients with sarcoma, major advances in basic and translational research have resulted, in more recent years, in clinical trial activity that is now beginning to generate promising results. However, to move from “proof of principle” to large scale clinical applicability, we need well-designed, multi-institutional clinical trials, along with continuous laboratory research to explore further the immunological characteristics of individual sarcoma subtypes and the consequent tailoring of therapy.

Immune-based therapies for sarcoma

Immunotherapy has shown promise in a number of tumor types, but its exact role in sarcoma remains to be defined. Advanced bone and soft tissue sarcomas are challenging diseases to treat with an unmet need for effective systemic therapy. Previous reports have suggested that immune-based treatments may be effective in sarcoma, but such approaches have not yet become part of standard clinical practice. A number of sarcoma subtypes express targets known as cancer testis antigens and hence may be excellent targets for immunotherapy. This paper will focus on the recent advances and understanding of cancer testis antigens in sarcoma and also clinical data of immunotherapeutic approaches in these diseases.

The ability of human bispecific anti-idiotype antibody to elicit humoral and cellular immune responses in mice

Our goal is to compare the immunogenicity and the extent of immunologic reactivity between bispecific and mono anti-idiotype vaccines. We previously obtained two human anti-Id antibody fragments fuse5-G22, fuse5-I50 by phage display technology which were mimics of the antigens from nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell line (HNE2). In this study, we developed and characterized a bispecific anti-Id antibody vaccine G22-I50 and its parent monovalent antibody vaccines G22 and I50. The efficacy of G22-I50, G22, and I50 as tumor vaccines was evaluated in Balb/c mice with three injections of these vaccines adjuvanted with Freund's adjuvant. Mice immunized with G22-I50 exhibited comparable levels of antibody titers and stronger binding inhibition capabilities. Spleen cells from G22-I50-immunized mice gave a significant proliferative response and higher expression level of IFN-gamma and IL-2.These results suggested that bispecific anti-Id antibody vaccine was able to induce more powerful humoral and cell-mediated immune responses, which might make it to be a potential vaccine candidate for the therapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Antibodies designed as effective cancer vaccines

Antigen/antibody complexes can efficiently target antigen presenting cells to allow stimulation of the cellular immune response. Due to the difficulty of manufacture and their inherent instability complexes have proved inefficient cancer vaccines. However, anti-idiotypic antibodies mimicking antigens have been shown to stimulate both antibody and T cell responses. The latter are due to T cell mimotopes expressed within the complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) of antibodies that are efficiently presented to dendritic cells in vivo. Based on this observation we have designed a DNA vaccine platform called ImmunoBody, where cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) and helper T cell epitopes replace CDR regions within the framework of a human IgG1 antibody. The ImmunoBody expression system has a number of design features which allow for rapid production of a wide range of vaccines. The CDR regions of the heavy and light chain have been engineered to contain unique restriction endonuclease sites, which can be easily opened, and oligonucleotides encoding the T cell epitopes inserted. The variable and constant regions of the ImmunoBody are also flanked by restriction sites, which permit easy exchange of other IgG subtypes. Here we show a range of T cell epitopes can be inserted into the ImmunoBody vector and upon immunization these T cell epitopes are efficiently processed and presented to stimulate high frequency helper and CTL responses capable of anti-tumor activity.

The multidisciplinary management of osteosarcoma

Patients with suspected or confirmed osteosarcoma should be evaluated and treated at a comprehensive cancer center within a multidisciplinary sarcoma program that includes pediatric, medical and radiation oncologists, orthopedic and surgical oncologists, musculoskeletal pathologists, and radiologists. Successful treatment involves proper diagnosis, neoadjuvant and adjuvant multi-agent chemotherapy, and aggressive surgery with an emphasis toward limb-preserving procedures. Treatment of osteosarcoma should be undertaken within the framework of large cooperative group clinical trials for children, adolescents, and adults. Patients treated with osteosarcoma should be followed closely both for recurrence of disease and for development of late effects of the treatment of their cancer. The treatment of metastatic, recurrent and/or refractory disease is more controversial. Despite advances in systemic treatment, surgical technique, and supportive care, the overall outcome is still poor.