Immunogenicity of rituximab in patients with severe pemphigus

Rituximab in the Management of Autoimmune Bullous Diseases: A Treatment-Resistant Case Series from a Single Central European Referral Center

Background and Objectives: Rituximab (RTX) has been the predominant treatment for autoimmune bullous diseases (AIBDs). The objective of this research was to assess the advantages and safety characteristics of RTX treatment in individuals with AIBD. This assessment focused on clinical remission and a reduction in glucocorticosteroid usage, its effect on the titers of autoantibodies targeting desmoglein-1 (DSG-1) and desmoglein-3 (DSG-3), and adverse occurrences during a 12-month follow-up period in a dermatology department within a Central European university context. Materials and Methods: Our case series involved eleven patients, including eight patients with pemphigus vulgaris, two with pemphigus foliaceus, and one with epidermolysis bullosa acquisita. They received a 1 g dose of rituximab, repeated over a two-week interval. Results: The reduction in a prednisone-equivalent dosage after 2, 6, and 12 months following the second RTX infusion was 65.05%, 73.99%, and 76.93%, in that order. The titers of antibodies against DSG-1 exhibited reductions of 43.29%, 75.86%, and 54.02% at 2, 6, and 12 months, respectively. By contrast, the antibody concentrations targeting DSG-3 displayed a decrease of 27.88%, 14.48%, and 5.09% at the corresponding time points. Over the course of the 12-month monitoring period, 18.18% of patients experienced disease relapse, while the remaining individuals achieved either complete or partial remission with minimal or no therapy. Adverse effects were noted in 36.36% of the patient population; they were mild, and no serious adverse effects were reported. Conclusions: RTX represents an efficacious and well-tolerated therapeutic option for the management of AIBD and merits consideration in cases of refractory AIBD. However, further research is imperative to delineate the most optimal dosage, dosing frequency, and total quantity of maintenance infusions required. Additionally, there is a compelling need for studies that explore the impact of RTX on individuals with AIBD who do not exhibit a significant reduction in anti-desmoglein autoantibody levels.

Development and validation of an automated assay for anti-drug-antibodies in rat serum

The potential immunogenicity of therapeutic human and humanized monoclonal antibodies (mAb) is a significant concern, and so preclinical testing of therapeutic mAbs routinely includes assessment of anti-drug antibody (ADA) induction. Here, we report the development of automated screening and confirmatory bridging ELISAs for the detection of rat antibodies against DH1042, an engineered human mAb for the SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain. The assays were evaluated for specificity, sensitivity, selectivity, absence of a prozone effect, linearity, intra- and inter- assay precision, and robustness, and found to be suitable for purpose. The assays were then used to evaluate anti-DH1042 antibodies in the sera of rats dosed with lipid-nanoparticle (LNP)-encapsulated mRNA encoding DH1042. Rats received two doses of 0.1, 0.4 or 0.6 mg/kg/dose LNP-mRNA 8 days apart. Twenty-one days after the second dose, 50-100% of rats had developed confirmed anti-DH1042 ADA depending on dose level. No animals in the control group developed anti-DH1042 ADA. These assays reflect new applications for a non-specialized laboratory automation platform, and the methodologies and approaches reported here provide a template that can be adapted for the automated detection and confirmation of ADA in preclinical testing of other biologics.

Anti-rituximab antibodies in patients with refractory autoimmune nodopathy with anti-neurofascin-155 antibody

Background

Recent studies have reported that similar to other IgG4 autoimmune diseases, such as muscle-specific kinase antibody-associated myasthenia gravis, most anti-neurofascin-155 (anti-NF155) nodopathies respond well to rituximab treatment, regardless of the dosage. However, there are still a few patients for which rituximab is ineffective for unknown reasons. Currently, there are no studies on the mechanism of ineffective treatment with rituximab.

Methods

A 33-year-old Chinese man presenting with numbness, tremor, and muscle weakness for 4 years was recruited for this study. Anti-NF155 antibodies were identified by cell-based assay and confirmed by immunofluorescence assay on teased fibers. The anti-NF155 immunoglobulin (IgG) subclasses were also detected by immunofluorescence assay. Anti-rituximab antibodies (ARAs) were quantitatively analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and peripheral B cell counts were determined by flow cytometry.

Results

The patient exhibited anti-NF155 IgG4-antibody positivity. After the first round of rituximab infusion, the patient showed stratified outcomes with improvements in numbness, muscle weakness and ambulation. However, after three rounds of rituximab infusion, the patient’s symptoms deteriorated, and the numbness, tremor and muscle weakness returned. No obvious improvement was found after plasma exchange and another round of rituximab treatment. 14 days after the last treatment with rituximab, ARAs were detected. And the titers gradually decreased on day 28 and 60 but remained higher than normal. Peripheral CD19+ B cell counts were less than 1% within the 2-month period following the final rituximab administration.

Conclusions

In this study, ARAs presented in a patient with anti-NF155 nodopathy undergoing rituximab treatment and showed an unfavorable impact on rituximab efficacy. This is the first case to report the occurrence of ARAs in patients with anti-NF155 antibodies. We suggest that ARAs should be tested early during the initial intervention, especially in patients who respond poorly to rituximab treatment. In addition, we believe it is necessary to investigate the association between ARAs and B cell counts, their effect on clinical efficacy, and their potential adverse reactions in a larger cohort of patients with anti-NF155 nodopathy.

Affinity Capture Elution (ACE) ELISA Method Development and Validation for Novel RPH-104 Drug Immunogenicity Evaluation

As the number of therapeutic protein products is growing rapidly, there is a strong need for the development of bioanalytical methods that are easy to perform, specific, sensitive, robust, and affordable. Methods for immunogenicity evaluation of therapeutic proteins take an important place in this field of bioanalytics. The aim of the study was to develop a method for immunogenicity testing of the novel RPH-104 drug using the Affinity Capture Elution (ACE) ELISA technique. RPH-104 is a promising Interleukin-1 (IL-1) inhibitor that is currently undergoing a series of clinical studies, including those on socially significant and orphan diseases. The developed method was validated for assay cut-point, sensitivity, selectivity, drug tolerance, hook effect, specificity, precision, and stability. Method sensitivity was established at 114.9 ng/mL, while low and high positive controls were equal to anti-RPH-104 antibody concentrations of 155 ng/mL and 2500 ng/mL, respectively. Method specificity was confirmed in the presence of the interfering compounds, namely IL-1α, IL-1β, and IL1-Ra. The developed and validated ELISA method was successfully applied to subject samples.

Evaluation of Clinical Relevance and Biological Effects of Antirituximab Antibodies in Patients With Pemphigus

Importance

The clinical relevance of antirituximab antibodies (ARAs) in patients with pemphigus who are treated with rituximab (RTX) is currently unknown.

Objective

To determine the prevalence of ARAs in patients with pemphigus who are treated with RTX and their association with complete remission (CR) and relapse.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This post hoc analysis of the Ritux3 trial was conducted from January 2010 to December 2015 in 25 dermatology departments in France and included 42 patients with moderate-to-severe pemphigus who were randomized to receive treatment with RTX. Five additional patients were recruited for an ancillary study. The proportions of patients who achieved CR or relapsed after an initial treatment cycle of RTX were compared depending on whether patients had ARAs.

Exposures

Patients were treated with 1000 mg of RTX on days 1 and 15 and 2 maintenance infusions of 500 mg at months 12 and 18.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Rates of relapse and sustained CR at month 36. Levels of ARAs, antidesmoglein 1/3 antibodies, RTX serum concentrations, and peripheral blood CD19+ B-cell frequency were measured.

Results

Of 42 participants with vs without ARAs, the mean (SD) age was 55 (17) years and 56 (17) years, respectively; 25 (59.5%) were women. Antirituximab antibodies were detected in the serum samples of 13 of 42 patients (31%) during the first year. Nine patients who experienced relapse before month 12 were excluded because they received additional infusions and could not be further analyzed. Among the 33 remaining patients, 2 patients (6.1%) experienced relapse after month 12, and 31 (95.9%) maintained a sustained CR until month 36. The rate of sustained CR was not different whether patients had ARAs (11 of 13 [85%]) or not (20 of 20 [100%]) (P = .15). Both groups (ARA+ vs ARA-) also had similar CD19+ B-cell depletion and RTX levels, but patients with ARAs had higher anti-desmoglein 3 antibody (DSG3 Abs) levels compared with those without ARAs (mean [SD], 30.1 [50.9] AU/mL vs 4.0 [4.3] AU/mL; P = .03). The 2 patients with ARAs who experienced relapse after month 12 had an undetectable RTX level, incomplete B-cell depletion, and higher anti-DSG3 Abs level than the 11 patients who maintained a sustained CR with ARAs (RTX mean [SD] concentration, 0 ug/mL vs 12.5 [2.2] ug/mL; P = .03; incomplete B-cell depletion, 2 of 2 vs 4 of 11; P = .19; mean [SD] anti-DSG3 Abs levels, 103.5 [61.5] AU/mL vs 19.5 [11.0] AU/mL; P = .001) or patients without ARAs (mean [SD] RTX concentration, 0 ug/mL vs 13.5 [1.8] ug/mL; P = .02; incomplete B-cell depletion, 2 of 2 vs 5 of 20; P = .09; mean [SD] anti-DSG3 Abs level, 103.5 [61.5] AU/mL vs 4.0 [1.0] AU/mL; P < .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

The results of this cohort study suggest that ARAs are frequently detected in patients with pemphigus who are treated with RTX and generally are not associated with patient outcomes. Only a few patients with the combination of ARAs, low RTX concentration, incomplete B-cell depletion, and persistent serum anti-DSG3 Abs seem at high risk of relapse.

Long-term experience with rituximab therapy for treatment-resistant moderate-to-severe pemphigus

BACKGROUND

Rituximab appears to be effective for treating pemphigus, although there are limited long-term data.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center study evaluated patients with conventional treatment-resistant pemphigus who received rituximab during September 2010-December 2019. The first rituximab cycle was based on the rheumatoid arthritis protocol in all patients except one patient, and additional single doses (500 mg or 1000 mg) were administered after clinical and/or serological relapse. The consensus definitions were used for complete remission off therapy, complete remission on minimal therapy, and clinical relapse. Serological relapse was defined as a progressive ≥2-fold increase in anti-desmoglein titers (vs. previous the measurement).

RESULTS

The study included 52 patients with pemphigus vulgaris and 1 patient with pemphigus foliaceus. The mean number of infusions was 5 and the average follow-up after the first infusion was 56 months. The average time to clinical and/or serological relapse was 12 months. Complete remission was achieved in 84.9% of patients, including after the first rituximab cycle in 25 patients (47.1%). Two patients died during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

Additional rituximab cycles may help achieve and prolong remission in patients with moderate-to-severe pemphigus resistant to conventional therapies. However, prospective trials are needed to identify the optimal dosing protocol.

Immunogenicity to biological drugs in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis

Monoclonal antibodies or fusion proteins, defined as biological drugs, have modified the natural history of numerous immune-mediated disorders, allowing the development of therapies aimed at blocking the pathophysiological pathways of the disease, providing greater efficacy and safety than conventional treatment strategies. Virtually all therapeutic proteins elicit an immune response, producing anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) against hypervariable regions of immunoglobulins. Immunogenicity against biological drugs can alter their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, thereby reducing the efficacy of these drugs. In more severe cases, ADAs can neutralize the therapeutic effects of the drug or cause serious adverse effects, mainly hypersensitivity reactions. The prevalence of ADAs varies widely depending on the type of test used, occurrence of false-negative results, and non-specific binding to the drug, making it difficult to accurately assess their clinical impact. Concomitant use of immunosuppressors efficiently reduces the immunogenicity in a dose-dependent manner, either by decreasing the frequency of detectable ADAs or by delaying their appearance, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of biological therapies. Among the new therapeutic strategies for the management of psoriasis, biological agents have gained increasing importance in recent years as they interrupt key inflammation pathways involved in the physiopathology of the disease. Reports regarding ADA in new biologics are still scarce, but the most recent evidence tends to show little impact on the clinical response to the drug, even with prolonged treatment. It is therefore essential to standardize laboratory tests to determine the presence and titles of ADAs to establish their administration and management guidelines that allow the determination of the real clinical impact of these drugs.

Clinical and biological activity of rituximab in the treatment of pemphigus

B-cells are major effector cells in autoimmunity since they differentiate into plasmocytes that produce pathogenic auto-antibody such as anti-desmoglein antibodies in pemphigus patients. Major advances were obtained using whole B-cell depleting therapies including anti-CD20 antibodies in refractory pemphigus patients that lead to rituximab approval in pemphigus patients in EU and USA. This review summarizes the data supporting the efficacy of rituximab in pemphigus and provides an overview of the reported immunological changes underlying its therapeutic action. Short and long-term remission in pemphigus is explained by the removal of autoreactive B-cells involved in the production of pathogenic IgG auto-antibodies and by enhancement of the appearance of regulatory B-cells that could maintain long term immune tolerance.

Novel Therapies for Pemphigus Vulgaris

Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is a severe chronic autoimmune blistering disease that affects the skin and mucous membranes. It is characterized by suprabasal acantholysis due to disruption of desmosomal connections between keratinocytes. Autoantibodies against desmosomal cadherins, desmoglein 3 and 1, have been shown to induce disease. Certain human leukocyte antigen (HLA) types and non-HLA foci confer genetic susceptibility. Until the discovery of corticosteroids in the 1950s, PV was 75% fatal. Since then, multiple PV treatments, such as systemic corticosteroids and adjunctive therapy with immunosuppressive medications (mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, methotrexate, gold, and others) have been introduced; however, none have led to long-term remissions and many have undesired adverse effects. Our growing understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms in PV is leading to development of new targeted therapies, such as intravenous immunoglobulin, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, inhibitors of Bruton tyrosine kinase and neonatal Fc receptors, and adoptive cellular transfer, that may result in lasting control of this life-threatening disease.

B-cell targeted therapies in pemphigus

Pemphigus is a rare autoimmune disease of the skin, characterized by autoantibodies targeting adhesion proteins of the epidermis, in particular desmoglein 3 and desmoglein 1, that cause the loss of cell-cell adhesion and the formation of intraepidermal blisters. Given that these autoantibodies are both necessary and sufficient for pemphigus to occur, the goal of pemphigus therapy is the elimination of autoreactive B-cells responsible for autoantibody production. Rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, was the first targeted B-cell therapy approved for use in pemphigus and is now considered the frontline therapy for new onset disease. One limitation of this treatment is that it targets both autoreactive and non -autoreactive B-cells, which accounts for the increased risk of serious infections in treated patients. In addition, most rituximab-treated patients experience disease relapse, highlighting the need of new therapeutic options. This review provides a concise overview of rituximab use in pemphigus and discusses new B-cell and antibody-directed therapies undergoing investigation in clinical studies.

The Molecular Mechanisms That Underlie the Immune Biology of Anti-drug Antibody Formation Following Treatment With Monoclonal Antibodies

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are a crucial asset for human health and modern medicine, however, the repeated administration of mAbs can be highly immunogenic. Drug immunogenicity manifests in the generation of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), and some mAbs show immunogenicity in up to 70% of patients. ADAs can alter a drug's pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, reducing drug efficacy. In more severe cases, ADAs can neutralize the drug's therapeutic effects or cause severe adverse events to the patient. While some contributing factors to ADA formation are known, the molecular mechanisms of how therapeutic mAbs elicit ADAs are not completely clear. Accurate ADA detection is necessary to provide clinicians with sufficient information for patient monitoring and clinical intervention. However, ADA assays present unique challenges because both the analyte and antigen are antibodies, so most assays are cumbersome, costly, time consuming, and lack standardization. This review will discuss aspects related to ADA formation following mAb drug administration. First, we will provide an overview of the prevalence of ADA formation and the available diagnostic tools for their detection. Next, we will review studies that support possible molecular mechanisms causing the formation of ADA. Finally, we will summarize recent approaches used to decrease the propensity of mAbs to induce ADAs.

Immunization to rituximab is more frequent in systemic autoimmune diseases than in rheumatoid arthritis: ofatumumab as alternative therapy

OBJECTIVES

The frequency and consequences of anti-drug antibodies to rituximab (RTX-ADA) are not well known in RA and even less in other systemic auto-immune diseases (sAID). We aimed to evaluate the frequency, consequences and predictive factors of RTX-ADA in RA and sAID.

METHODS

All patients presenting with RA or other sAID treated with RTX from 2012 to 2017 in our tertiary reference centre for sAID were retrospectively studied. Patients who were tested for RTX-ADA were identified.

RESULTS

One hundred and ninety-nine patients were treated with RTX (RA: 124, other sAID: 75). Among 62/199 (31.1%) tested for RTX-ADA, 14 were positive: 3/35 RA (8.6%) and 11/27 (40.7%) other sAID, (P = 0.0047). Among the whole RTX-treated populations, the frequency of RTX-ADA was 2.4% and 14.7% (P = 0.0026) in RA and sAID, respectively. Most of the immunized patients had infusion reactions to second or subsequent RTX cycles (11/14) and loss of efficacy (2/14). Predictive factors of immunization were sAID vs RA (78.6% vs 21.4%, P = 0.026, adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 5.35[1.43-54.75]) and African ethnicity (57.1% vs 4.2%, P < 0.001, adjusted OR = 9.25 [5.08-302.12]). Associated immunosuppressive therapy did not protect against immunization. Three patients with pSS immunized against RTX were treated with ofatumumab with complete remission of their disease.

CONCLUSION

Immunization against RTX is more frequent in other sAID than in RA. Testing for RTX-ADA must be performed in patients with infusion reactions or loss of efficacy especially if they are of African origin. Immunized patients might be treated efficiently and safely with ofatumumab. This alternative should be further evaluated for sAID.

Hypersensitivity reactions to biologics (part I): allergy as an important differential diagnosis in complex immune-derived adverse events

Purpose

Biotechnological substances (BSs) are strongly relied upon to prevent rejection of transplanted organs, and to treat oncological, allergological, and other inflammatory diseases. Allergic reactions to partly foreign biologics can occur due to their potential immunogenicity. The severity of an immune response to a biological drug may range from no clinical significance to a severe, life-threatening anaphylactic reaction.

Methods

Detailed searches were performed on Pubmed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to include all available publications. In addition, the Food and Drug Administration, the European Medicines Agency, and British Columbia Cancer Agency Drug Manual databases were screened for hypersensitivity reaction (HSR), infusion reaction, injection site reaction, urticaria, and anaphylaxis for individual BSs.

Results

Treatment with BSs can cause various types of HSR. These are mentioned in the literature with definitions such as allergic reactions, anaphylactoid reactions, anaphylaxis, HSR, infusion reactions, injection site reactions, cytokine release syndrome, and urticaria. Due to the overlap in signs and symptoms in the reported descriptions, it is not always possible to differentiate these reactions properly according to their pathomechanism. Similarly, many data reported as anaphylaxis actually describe severe anaphylactic reactions (grades III or IV).

Conclusion

There is an urgent need for a simpler symptom- or system-based classification and scoring system to create an awareness for HSRs to BSs. A better understanding of the pathophysiology of HSRs and increased clinical experience in the treatment of side effects will provide timely control of unexpected reactions. As a result, immunotherapy with BSs will become safer in the future.

Neutralizing Anti-Rituximab Antibodies and Relapse in Membranous Nephropathy Treated With Rituximab

Membranous Nephropathy (MN) is an autoimmune disease associated with antibodies against podocyte proteins: M-type phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R1) or thrombospondin type-1 domain-containing 7A (THSD7A) in 70 and 3% of patients, respectively. Antibody titer is correlated with disease activity: rising during active disease and decreasing before remission. Therefore, decreasing PLA2R1-Antibodies titer has become an important goal of therapy. Rituximab a chimeric monoclonal antibody induces remission in 60-80% of primary MN patients. All monoclonal antibodies such as rituximab can elicit antidrug antibodies, which may interfere with therapeutic response. We aim to analyze the relevance of anti-rituximab antibodies on the outcome of MN after a first course of rituximab. Forty-four MN patients were included and treated with two 1 g infusions of rituximab at 2-weeks interval. Anti-rituximab antibodies, CD19 count, and clinical response were analyzed. Then, we (i) analyzed the association of anti-rituximab antibodies at month-6 with response to treatment: remission, relapse and the need for another rituximab course; (ii) confirmed if anti-rituximab antibodies could neutralize rituximab B-cells depletion; and (iii) tested whether anti-rituximab antibodies could cross-inhibit new humanized anti-CD20 therapies. Anti-rituximab antibodies were detected in 10 patients (23%). Seventeen patients received a second rituximab course after a median time of 12 months (7-12), following nine cases of resistance and eight relapses. Anti-rituximab antibodies were significantly associated with faster B-cell reconstitution at month-6 (75 [57-89] vs. 2 [0-41] cells/μl, p = 0.006), higher proteinuria 12 months after rituximab infusion (1.7 [0.7; 5.8] vs. 0.6 [0.2; 3.4], p = 0.03) and before treatment modification (3.5 [1.6; 7.1] vs. 1.7 [0.2; 1.7] p = 0.0004). Remission rate 6 months after rituximab was not different according to anti-rituximab status (p > 0.99) but the rate of relapse was significantly higher for patients with anti-rituximab antibodies (p < 0.001). These patients required more frequently a second course of rituximab infusions (7/10 vs. 10/34, p = 0.03). Anti-rituximab antibodies neutralized rituximab activity in 8/10 patients and cross-reacted with other humanized monoclonal antibodies in only two patients. Three patients with anti-rituximab antibodies were successfully treated with ofatumumab. Anti-rituximab antibodies could neutralize rituximab B cells cytotoxicity and impact clinical outcome of MN patients. Humanized anti-CD20 seems to be a satisfying therapeutic alternative for patients with anti-rituximab antibodies and resistant or relapsing MN.

Molecular Landscape of Anti-Drug Antibodies Reveals the Mechanism of the Immune Response Following Treatment With TNFα Antagonists

Drugs formulated from monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are clinically effective in various diseases. Repeated administration of mAbs, however, elicits an immune response in the form of anti-drug-antibodies (ADA), thereby reducing the drug's efficacy. Notwithstanding their importance, the molecular landscape of ADA and the mechanisms involved in their formation are not fully understood. Using a newly developed quantitative bio-immunoassay, we found that ADA concentrations specific to TNFα antagonists can exceed extreme concentrations of 1 mg/ml with a wide range of neutralization capacity. Our data further suggest a preferential use of the λ light chain in a subset of neutralizing ADA. Moreover, we show that administration of TNFα antagonists result in a vaccine-like response whereby ADA formation is governed by the extrafollicular T cell-independent immune response. Our bio-immunoassay coupled with insights on the nature of the immune response can be leveraged to improve mAb immunogenicity assessment and facilitate improvement in therapeutic intervention strategies.

Rituximab-induced serum sickness is more frequent in autoimmune diseases as compared to hematological malignancies: A French nationwide study

INTRODUCTION

Rituximab induced serum sickness (RISS) is a rare delayed hypersensitivity reaction. The aim of this study was to describe the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of the RISS cases reported in France.

METHOD

Serum sickness cases involving rituximab were identified from the French PharmacoVigilance Database from 1998 to 2016.

RESULTS

We analyzed 37 cases of RISS. Rituximab was prescribed for an autoimmune disease in 78% of cases. Serum sickness occurred mainly after the first injection (54%) with a median time to onset of 12 days. The most frequent manifestations were rheumatologic symptoms (92%), fever (87%), and skin lesions (78%). The incidence was significantly higher when rituximab was used for autoimmune diseases than for a hematological malignancies. Taking into account the existence of a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) as the indication of rituximab or as a comorbidity, the incidence of RISS in patients with SLE was even higher.

DISCUSSION

We report on the largest series of RISS studied to date and confirm that this reaction preferentially occurs in patients with autoimmune disease, especially SLE. This may be due to B-cell lysis, leading to the release of intracellular antigens into the serum and subsequent antigen-antibody complex formation, especially in patients with elevated autoantibody production. This could also explain why RISS often occurred after a single injection.

CONCLUSION

Patients generally recovered from RISS rapidly without obvious benefit from corticosteroid therapy. The risk of recurrence should prompt clinicians to question the use of rituximab after an episode of RISS.

[Therapy of pemphigus]

BACKGROUND

Pemphigus diseases are a heterogeneous group of potentially life-threatening autoimmune bullous disorders. Therefore, rapidly acting and effective therapeutic approaches are essential.

OBJECTIVES

In this review, current therapeutic options in line with available guidelines are presented and new therapeutic approaches are discussed.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using PubMed.

RESULTS

Treatment of pemphigus is based on systemic glucocorticosteroids, frequently combined with potentially corticosteroid-sparing immunosuppressants such as azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenolic acid. Recently, the impressive efficacy of the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab has been shown in a prospective randomized trial. In severe or treatment-refractory cases, immunoadsorption or high-dose intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) are recommended. Adjuvant immunoadsorption also seems to be useful within the first 8-12 weeks of therapy in patients with very high autoantibody levels. A variety of new therapeutic approaches is currently evaluated in phase IIa studies.

CONCLUSION

Therapy of pemphigus has been greatly improved by the employment of rituximab. The use of glucocorticosteroids, associated with a high number of adverse events and elevated mortality, could be reduced by the additional use of rituximab. After approval of rituximab for the treatment of pemphigus by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2018, licensing in Europe is expected in 2019.

Effect of different rituximab regimens on B cell depletion and time to relapse in children with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Several studies have demonstrated that rituximab (RTX) improves relapse-free survival in patients with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS). However, these studies used various RTX regimens and there are few data comparing these regimens in children with SDNS. In this retrospective study, we assessed the effect of three different initial RTX regimens on both time to B cell reconstitution and to first relapse.

METHODS

Sixty-one SDNS patients receiving a first course of RTX were included. Group 1 received one injection of 100 mg/m², group 2 received one injection of 375 mg/m², and group 3 received two injections of 375 mg/m² at day 0 and day 7. Time to B cell reconstitution and time to first relapse and respective risk factors were studied.

RESULTS

Median time to B cell reconstitution was 2.5 [1.8-3.5], 5.0 [3.9-6.0], and 6.6 [4.6-7.8] months in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. RTX regimen was associated with time to B cell reconstitution (HRs group 2 vs. 3, 4.07 [1.96-8.48]; group 1 vs. 3, 11.13 [4.04-30.67]). One-year relapse-free survival was 50% [58-77], 59% [42-76], and 72% [46-87] in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. RTX regimen was associated with risk of relapse (HRs group 2 vs. 3, 1.55 [0.51-4.65]; group 1 vs. 3, 4.98 [1.15-21.60]).

CONCLUSIONS

The initial dose of rituximab impacts time to B cell reconstitution and the probability of relapse. Risk of relapse is also associated with patient characteristics, suggesting that RTX regimen could be modified for each patient to balance efficacy, cost, and side effects.

Anti-drug Antibodies Against a Novel Humanized Anti-CD20 Antibody Impair Its Therapeutic Effect on Primary Biliary Cholangitis in Human CD20- and FcγR-Expressing Mice

There is considerable interest in expanding B cell-targeted therapies in human autoimmune diseases. However, clinical trials in human primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) using a chimeric antibody against human CD20 (hCD20) have showed limited efficacy. Two potential explanations for these disappointing results are the appearance of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) and the high frequency of patients with moderate PBC or patients who had failed ursodeoxycholic acid treatment. Here, we studied a novel humanized IgG1 antibody against hCD20 and explored its efficacy in early stage PBC using a well-defined murine model. We developed a unique murine model consisting of dnTGF-βRII mice expressing hCD20 and human Fcγ receptors (hFcγRs). Beginning at 4–6 weeks of age, equivalent to stage I/II human PBC, female mice were given weekly injections of an anti-hCD20 antibody (TKM-011) or vehicle control, and monitored for liver histology as well as a broad panel of immunological readouts. After 16 weeks' treatment, we observed a significant reduction in portal inflammation, a decrease in liver-infiltrating mononuclear cells as well as a reduction in liver CD8⁺ T cells. Importantly, direct correlations between numbers of liver non-B cells and B cells (r = 0.7426, p = 0.0006) and between numbers of liver memory CD8⁺ T cells and B cells (r = 0.6423, p = 0.0054) were apparent. Accompanying these changes was a dramatic reduction in anti-mitochondrial antibodies (AMAs), interleukin (IL)-12p40 and IL-5, and elevated levels of the anti-inflammatory chemokine CXCL1/KC. In mice that developed ADAs, clinical improvements were less pronounced. Sustained treatment with B cell-targeted therapies may broadly inhibit effector pathways in PBC, but may need to be administered early in the natural history of PBC.

Immunogenicity of Therapeutic Antibodies: Monitoring Antidrug Antibodies in a Clinical Context

One of the factors that may impact drug levels of therapeutic antibodies in patients is immunogenicity, with potential loss of efficacy. Nowadays, many immunogenicity assays are available for testing antidrug antibodies (ADA). In this article, we discuss different types of immunogenicity assays and their clinical relevance in terms of drug tolerance, relation with pharmacokinetics (PK), neutralizing antibodies, potential adverse events associated with ADA, and prediction of ADA production. Drug-tolerant assays can provide insight into the process of immunogenicity, but for clinical management, these assays do not necessarily outperform drug-sensitive assays. The usefulness of any ADA assay for clinical decision making will be larger when drug concentrations are also measured, and this is true, in particular, for drug-tolerant assays.

Humanization of chimeric anti-CD20 antibody by logical and bioinformatics approach with retention of biological activity

AIM

To develop a fully bioactive humanized antibody from the chimeric rituximab for potential clinical applications using a relatively simpler and faster logical and bioinformatics approach.

METHODS

From bioinformatics data, mismatched mouse amino acids in variable light and heavy chain amphipathic regions were identified and substituted with those common to human antibody framework. Appropriate synthetic DNA sequences inserted into vectors were transfected into HEK293 cells to produce the humanized antibody.

RESULTS

Humanized antibodies showed specific binding to CD20 and greater cytotoxicity to cancer WIL2-NS cell proliferation than rituximab in vitro.

CONCLUSION

A humanized version of rituximab with potential to be developed into a biobetter for treatment of B-cell disorders has been successfully generated using a logical and bioinformatics approach.

Reporting, Visualization, and Modeling of Immunogenicity Data to Assess Its Impact on Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, and Safety of Monoclonal Antibodies

The rapidly increasing number of therapeutic biologics in development has led to a growing recognition of the need for improvements in immunogenicity assessment. Published data are often inadequate to assess the impact of an antidrug antibody (ADA) on pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy, and enable a fully informed decision about patient management in the event of ADA development. The recent introduction of detailed regulatory guidance for industry should help address many past inadequacies in immunogenicity assessment. Nonetheless, careful analysis of gathered data and clear reporting of results are critical to a full understanding of the clinical relevance of ADAs, but have not been widely considered in published literature to date. Here, we review visualization and modeling of immunogenicity data. We present several relatively simple visualization techniques that can provide preliminary information about the kinetics and magnitude of ADA responses, and their impact on pharmacokinetics and clinical endpoints for a given therapeutic protein. We focus on individual sample- and patient-level data, which can be used to build a picture of any trends, thereby guiding analysis of the overall study population. We also discuss methods for modeling ADA data to investigate the impact of immunogenicity on pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety.

Anti-Rituximab antibody in patients with NMOSDs treated with low dose Rituximab

BACKGROUND

Rituximab is a mouse-human chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and has been increasingly used for preventing relapses in NMOSDs. The clinical relevance of Anti-Rituximab antibodies (ARA) against Rituximab in NMOSDs is unknown.

METHODS

Nineteen NMOSDs patients receiving repeated 100mg Rituximab treatment were recruited. The ARA was quantitatively analyzed by enzyme linked immunoassay. Annualized relapse rate (ARR) and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) were analyzed concurrently.

RESULTS

ARR was reduced markedly since starting Rituximab therapy in the majority (78.9%) of NMOSDs patients. 36.9% (7/19) patients were ARA positive. There was no significant difference in the improvement of ARR and EDSS after treatment with Rituximab in either ARA positive or negative groups. The frequency of Rituximab reinfusion was higher in patients with ARA, suggesting that the presence of ARA led to an increased frequency of Rituximab reinfusion to maintain B cell depletion.

CONCLUSION

The majority of (78.9%) patients with NMOSDs were responsive to low dose Rituximab. The presence of ARA is associated with the requirement for increased frequency of Rituximab reinfusion to maintain treatment response in NMOSDs. In patients with ARA it might be necessary to detect ARA levels and monitor B cell depletion closely, or even attempt other treatments.

Rituximab in pemphigus

Pemphigus is a severe autoimmune blistering disease mediated by pathogenic anti-desmoglein antibodies leading to an inter keratinocyte disjunction. Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to the CD-20 antigen of B lymphocytes, which causes B-cell depletion and a subsequent reduction in pathogenic autoantibodies. Its therapeutic role in pemphigus has been progressively growing with increasing evidence of successful outcomes. Rituximab was initially off-labeled used as an alternative in patients with recalcitrant or relapsing pemphigus and in patients with contraindications to systemic corticosteroids. Recently, a large randomized clinical trial has shown that first-line use of rituximab combined with short-term prednisone regimen was both more effective and potentially safer than a standard regimen of high doses of corticosteroids in patients with moderate to severe pemphigus.

Quantitative analysis of the CD4+ T cell response to therapeutic antibodies in healthy donors using a novel T cell:PBMC assay

Many biopharmaceuticals (BPs) are known to be immunogenic in the clinic, which can result in modified pharmacokinetics, reduced efficacy, allergic reactions and anaphylaxis. During recent years, several technologies to predict immunogenicity have been introduced, but the predictive value is still considered low. Thus, there is an unmet medical need for optimization of such technologies. The generation of T cell dependent high affinity anti-drug antibodies plays a key role in clinical immunogenicity. This study aimed at developing and evaluating a novel in vitro T cell:PBMC assay for prediction of the immunogenicity potential of BPs. To this end, we assessed the ability of infliximab (anti-TNF-α), rituximab (anti-CD20), adalimumab (anti-TNF-α) and natalizumab (anti-α4-integrin), all showing immunogenicity in the clinic, to induce a CD4⁺ T cells response. Keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) and cytomegalovirus pp65 protein (CMV) were included as neo-antigen and recall antigen positive controls, respectively. By analyzing 26 healthy donors having HLA-DRB1 alleles matching the European population, we calculated the frequency of responding donors, the magnitude of the response, and the frequency of BP-specific T cells, as measured by ³[H]-thymidine incorporation and ELISpot IL-2 secretion. KLH and CMV demonstrated a strong T cell response in all the donors analyzed. The frequency of responding donors to the BPs was 4% for infliximab, 8% for adalimumab, 19% for rituximab and 27% for natalizumab, which is compared to and discussed with their respective observed clinical immunogenicity. This study further complements predictive immunogenicity testing by quantifying the in vitro CD4⁺ T cell responses to different BPs. Even though the data generated using this modified method does not directly translate to the clinical situation, a high sensitivity and immunogenic potential of most BPs is demonstrated.

Assessing the Immunogenicity of Biopharmaceuticals

Biopharmaceuticals have the potential to raise an immunogenic response in treated individuals, which may impact the efficacy and safety profile of these drugs. As a result, it is essential to evaluate immunogenicity throughout the different phases of the clinical development of a biopharmaceutical, including post-marketing surveillance. Although rigorous evaluation of biopharmaceutical immunogenicity is required by regulatory authorities, there is a lack of uniform standards for the type, quantity, and quality of evidence, and for guidance on experimental design for immunogenicity assays or criteria to compare immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals. Moreover, substantial technological advances in methods to assess immune responses have yielded higher immunogenicity rates with modern assays, and limit comparison of immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals outside of head-to-head clinical trials. Accordingly, research programs, regulatory agencies, and clinicians need to keep pace with continuously evolving analyses of immunogenicity. Here, we review factors associated with immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals, potential clinical ramifications, and current regulatory guidance for evaluating immunogenicity, and discuss methods to assess immunogenicity in non-clinical and clinical studies. We also describe special considerations for evaluating the immunogenicity of biosimilar candidates.

Kinetic analysis of changes in T- and B-lymphocytes after anti-CD20 treatment in renal pathology

INTRODUCTION

The main objective of this study is to describe qualitatively and quantitatively the different immune lymphocyte phenotypes of patients with renal disease after treatment with anti-CD20.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two cohorts of transplanted and autoimmune kidney patients were compared: (1) Those who began treatment with Rituximab, matched (for sex, age and general clinical parameters) with (2) Non-treated control kidney patients. Different analyses were performed: (A) B-lymphocyte subpopulations; (B) T-cell subpopulations; (C) serum levels of BAFF, APRIL, Rituximab and anti-Rituximab; (D) rs396991 polymorphism of CD16a and at different time points for each type of analysis: (i) at baseline, (ii) day 15, (iii) at three and (iv) six months post-antiCD20.

RESULTS

(A) A depletion of all B cell subsets analysed was observed preferentially decreasing the CD40⁺memory B-cells, switched memory cells and plasmablasts. (B) A significant decreased percentage of CD4⁺T-lymphocytes was observed. A significant decrease of the percentage of memory T-cells and an increase in naïve T-cells was also observed. (C) A significant increase for APRIL was observed, as well as a positive correlation between the APRIL levels, and the differential of B-cells. (D) The presence of CD16a Valine-variant induced greater changes in the variations of total T-cell and T-naïve subpopulations.

CONCLUSION

Our results highlight that the treatment of renal disease with Rituximab affects T-cells, particularly naïve/memory balance, while APRIL could be also a secondary marker of this treatment. The sequential analysis of phenotypic alterations of B- and T-cells could help patient management, although further studies to identify periods of remission or clinical relapse are warranted.

[Pemphigus. Model disease for targeted therapy]

BACKGROUND

Pemphigus is a severe bullous autoimmune dermatosis that represents a clinical challenge despite high-dose immunosuppressive therapy due to the therapy-related comorbidities and the lack of long-term control of disease activity.

OBJECTIVES

Which targeted therapies are currently used in pemphigus and which innovative therapeutic strategies are in clinical development?

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A review of the literature in PubMed was performed under consideration of the current guideline for the treatment of pemphigus as well as of our own results. Discussion of basic findings and results of targeted therapies in autoantibody-mediated autoimmune disorders were taken into account.

RESULTS

Immunapheresis and high-dose intravenous immunoglobulins with the aim of reducing circulating autoantibodies have been successfully used in the treatment of pemphigus. Depletion of autoreactive B-lymphocytes provides the rationale for the use of the monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody rituximab which demonstrated long-term clinical remission of pemphigus in clinical trials. Current developments include the investigation of humanised B-cell depleting antibodies in other B-cell driven autoimmune disorders as well as the identification of new cellular and molecular target structures that are essential in the humoral autoimmune cascade and exert important immune regulatory functions, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The well-characterised basic pathogenesis of pemphigus results in targeted therapies. Currently, therapies aiming at rapid reduction of circulating autoantibodies and the depletion of autoreactive B-cells are in clinical use. More cellular and molecular target structures are being investigated in other autoantibody-driven autoimmune disorders and they provide promising candidates for innovative pathogenesis-related therapeutic strategies in pemphigus in the future.

Cross-reactive and pre-existing antibodies to therapeutic antibodies--Effects on treatment and immunogenicity

The potential for immunogenicity is an ever-present concern during the development of biopharmaceuticals. Therapeutic antibodies occasionally elicit an antibody response in patients, which can result in loss of response or adverse effects. However, antibodies that bind a drug are sometimes found in pre-treatment serum samples, with the amount depending on drug, assay, and patient population. This review summarizes published data on pre-existing antibodies to therapeutic antibodies, including rheumatoid factors, anti-allotype antibodies, anti-hinge antibodies, and anti-glycan antibodies. Unlike anti-idiotype antibodies elicited by the drug, pre-formed antibodies in general appear to have little consequences during treatment. In the few cases where (potential) clinical consequences were encountered, antibodies were characterized and found to bind a distinct, unusual epitope of the therapeutic. Immunogenicity testing strategies should therefore always include a proper level of antibody characterization, especially when pre-formed antibodies are present. This minimizes false-positives, particularly due to rheumatoid factors, and helps to judge the potential threat in case a genuine pre-dose antibody reactivity is identified.

Future therapies for pemphigus vulgaris: Rituximab and beyond

The conventional treatment for patients with pemphigus vulgaris (PV) centers on global immunosuppression, such as the use of steroids and other immunosuppressive drugs, to decrease titers of antidesmoglein autoantibodies responsible for the acantholytic blisters. Global immunosuppressants, however, cause serious side effects. The emergence of anti-CD20 biologic medications, such as rituximab, as an adjunct to conventional therapy has shifted the focus to targeted destruction of autoimmune B cells. Next-generation biologic medications with improved modes of delivery, pharmacology, and side effect profiles are constantly being developed, adding to the diversity of options for PV treatment. We review promising monoclonal antibodies, including veltuzumab, obinutuzumab (GA-101), ofatumumab, ocaratuzumab (AME-133v), PRO131921, and belimumab.

The emerging role of rituximab in autoimmune blistering diseases

Rituximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to the CD20 molecule on B cells, resulting in their lysis. In autoimmune blistering diseases, the auto-antibody-producing B cells are destroyed and auto-antibody levels are reduced or eliminated. In the majority of patients, rituximab produces rapid clinical response and early resolution. In part, this accounts for the increased use of rituximab. Rituximab does not distinguish normal from pathologic B cells. Hence, shortly after its use, B-cell levels are zero and remain so for several months. In most patients, the use of systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents are continued after rituximab therapy, while their dosages are significantly decreased. In the majority of patients rituximab is used according to the protocol used in treating lymphoma patients or patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Approximately 50% of patients experience a relapse, requiring additional therapy. Serious adverse events and fatal outcomes have been reported, although their incidence is less than that observed with conventional therapy. Nonetheless, the causes, i.e. infections and septicemia, are similar. Several gaps exist in our understanding of how to optimally benefit from the use of this valuable biological agent. Future studies need to be targeted in designing and implanting protocols that maximize the benefit of rituximab and result in producing sustained prolonged remissions with minimal adverse events and a high quality of life.

Managing unwanted immunogenicity of biologicals

All protein drugs (biologicals) have an immunogenic potential and we are armed with multiple guidelines, regulatory documents and white papers to assist us in assessing the level of risk for unwanted immunogenicity of new biologicals. However, for certain biologicals, significant immunogenicity becomes only apparent after their use in patients. Causes of immunogenicity are multifactorial but not yet fully understood. Within the pharmaceutical industry there are only a few opportunities to openly discuss the causes and consequences of immunogenicity with regard to the development of new biologicals. The annual Open Scientific Symposium of the European Immunogenicity Platform (EIP) is one such meeting that brings together scientists and clinicians from academia and industry to build know-how and expertise in the field of immunogenicity. The critical topics discussed at the last EIP meeting (February 2014) will be reviewed here. The current opinion of this expert group is that the assessment of unwanted immunogenicity can be improved by using prediction tools, optimizing the performance of immunogenicity assays and learning from the clinical impact of other biologicals that have already been administered to patients. A multidisciplinary approach is warranted to better understand and minimize drug immunogenicity and its clinical consequences.

Systematic comparison of drug-tolerant assays for anti-drug antibodies in a cohort of adalimumab-treated rheumatoid arthritis patients

Drug interference complicates assessment of immunogenicity of biologicals and results in an underestimation of anti-drug antibody (ADA) formation. Drug-tolerant assays have the potential to overcome such limitations. However, to which extent drug-tolerant assays provide an unbiased picture of the antibody response to a biological is unknown. In this study, we compared the measurement of ADA to adalimumab in 94 consecutive adalimumab-treated rheumatoid arthritis patients using the traditional antigen binding test (ABT) and four different drug-tolerant assays, the Ph-shift anti-Idiotype Antigen binding test (PIA) and three newly developed assays for this study: an acid-dissociation radioimmunoassay (ARIA), a temperature-shift radioimmunoassay (TRIA) and an electrochemoluminescence-based assay (ECL). Our results indicate that drug-tolerant assays provide a fairly consistent view on the antibody formation: quantitatively, the results from all four assays correlate well (Spearman r > 0.9). However, the percentage of ADA-positive patients ranges from 51 to 66% between assays, with the ARIA identifying the highest number of patients as positive. These differences are largely due to patients making low amounts of ADA; if ADA levels were above ca. 100 AU/ml, a patient was identified as positive in all four assays. Adalimumab concentrations were significantly lower in ADA-positive samples. Taken together, the results indicate that these different drug-tolerant assays provide a similar and reasonably consistent view on ADA responses, which however, breaks down at the lower end of the detectable range, and highlight that ADA is best reported quantitatively. Furthermore, if an even more sensitive drug-tolerant assay could be developed, one would probably find additional positive samples that will predominantly contain very low levels of ADA.

Successful desensitization of a patient with rituximab hypersensitivity

Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody which targets CD20 in B cells that is used for the treatment of CD20 positive oncologic and hematologic malignancies. Rituximab causes hypersensitivity reactions during infusions. The delay of treatment or loss of a highly efficient drug can be prevented by rapid drug desensitization method in patients who are allergic to rituximab. We report a low grade B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma patient with rituximab hypersensitivity successfully treated with rapid drug desensitization. In experienced centers, drug desensitization is a novel modality to break through in case of hypersensitivity that should be considered.

Orofacial adverse effects of biological agents

Biological agents (BA) are increasingly used effectively in the treatment of a range of disorders, but to date, their application in diseases affecting the orofacial region has been fairly limited. Several orofacial adverse effects related to BA have been recently reported. However, the evidence for such adverse reactions is not always strong, and some of the adverse effects of BA have only been reported in case reports or case series. Most reactions to BA reported thus far have been in association with antitumor necrosis factor-α agents, which is not surprising, as these are the most widely-used BA. In the present study, the orofacial adverse effects are reported with various BA in order to sensitize clinicians to the possibilities. In addition, we briefly summarize the mode of action and indications of these BA. As the use and range of BA increases, the number and diversity of adverse effects might well increase. Despite the adverse effects of biological agents, these may often be less serious than the adverse effects of the more traditional immunosuppressive agents.

Genetic manipulation of B cells for the isolation of rare therapeutic antibodies from the human repertoire

Antibody based therapies are increasingly applied to prevent and treat human disease. While the majority of antibodies currently on the market are chimeric or humanized antibodies from rodents, the focus has now shifted to the isolation and development of fully human antibodies. By retroviral transduction of B cell lymphoma-6 (BCL-6), which prevents terminal differentiation of B cells and, the anti-apoptotic gene B-cell lymphoma-extra large (Bcl-xL) into primary human B cells we efficiently immortalize antibody-producing B cells allowing the isolation of therapeutic antibodies. Selection of antigen-specific B cell clones was greatly facilitated because the transduced B cells retain surface immunoglobulin expression and secrete immunoglobulin into the culture supernatant. Surface immunoglobulin expression can be utilized to stain and isolate antigen specific B cell clones with labeled antigen. Immunoglobulins secreted in culture supernatant can directly be tested in functional assays to identify unique B cell clones. Here we describe the key features of our Bcl-6/Bcl-xL culture platform (AIMSelect).