Gestational thyroid reference intervals in antibody-negative Chinese women

Free thyroxine measurement in clinical practice: how to optimize indications, analytical procedures, and interpretation criteria while waiting for global standardization

Thyroid dysfunctions are among the most common endocrine disorders and accurate biochemical testing is needed to confirm or rule out a diagnosis. Notably, true hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism in the setting of a normal thyroid-stimulating hormone level are highly unlikely, making the assessment of free thyroxine (FT4) inappropriate in most new cases. However, FT4 measurement is integral in both the diagnosis and management of relevant central dysfunctions (central hypothyroidism and central hyperthyroidism) as well as for monitoring therapy in hyperthyroid patients treated with anti-thyroid drugs or radioiodine. In such settings, accurate FT4 quantification is required. Global standardization will improve the comparability of the results across laboratories and allow the development of common clinical decision limits in evidence-based guidelines. The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Committee for Standardization of Thyroid Function Tests has undertaken FT4 immunoassay method comparison and recalibration studies and developed a reference measurement procedure that is currently being validated. However, technical and implementation challenges, including the establishment of different clinical decision limits for distinct patient groups, still remain. Accordingly, different assays and reference values cannot be interchanged. Two-way communication between the laboratory and clinical specialists is pivotal to properly select a reliable FT4 assay, establish reference intervals, investigate discordant results, and monitor the analytical and clinical performance of the method over time.

Outcomes of Early-Pregnancy Antithyroid Drug Withdrawal in Graves' Disease: A Preliminary Prospective Follow-Up Study

Objective: The use of antithyroid drugs (ATDs) carries potential risk for teratogenic effects. For women with well-controlled hyperthyroidism on a low dose of ATDs, drug withdrawal upon pregnancy is recommended by international medical guidelines. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the characteristics of patients suitable for ATD withdrawal, subsequent changes in thyroid function after ATD discontinuation, and its impact on pregnancy and offspring outcomes. Methods: This prospective study recruited 63 pregnant women with well-controlled Graves' hyperthyroidism who had stopped ATDs during early pregnancy. Patients were followed up until the end of pregnancy and data on pregnancy outcomes were collected. Results: Overall, 20 patients (31.7%) had rebound of hyperthyroidism. Patients with either subnormal thyrotropin (TSH) levels (TSH <0.35 mIU/L, odds ratio [OR] = 5.12, confidence interval [CI = 1.29-20.34], p = 0.03) or positive thyrotropin receptor antibody (TRAb) (TRAb >1.75 IU/L, OR = 3.79, [CI = 1.17-12.30], p = 0.02) at the time of ATDs withdrawal presented a higher risk of rebound than those with either normal TSH levels or negative TRAb. Patients with both subnormal TSH and positive TRAb at the time of ATD withdrawal were more likely to experience rebound (83.3%, 5/6) than those with both normal TSH and negative TRAb (13%, 3/23, OR = 33.33, [CI = 2.83-392.60], p = 0.003). The prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes was significantly higher in patients who experienced rebound compared with those who did not (55.0% vs. 9.3%, OR = 11.92, [CI = 3.08-46.18], p = 0.0002). Conclusions: Subnormal TSH levels and TRAb positivity at the time of ATD withdrawal in early pregnancy may be associated with rebound of Graves' hyperthyroidism. Rebound of hyperthyroidism during pregnancy may increase the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Physiological and metabolic adaptations in pregnancy: importance of trimester-specific reference intervals to investigate maternal health and complications

Diagnosis, prognostication, and monitoring of maternal health throughout pregnancy relies on laboratory testing, including but not limited to key markers of thyroid, hepatic, cardiac, hematology, and renal function. Dynamic physiological processes during gestation significantly influence the maternal biochemistry that supports both the mother and fetus. Resultant changes in blood biochemistry alter the expected values of common laboratory tests. However, the importance of pregnancy-specific reference intervals for laboratory test result interpretation and appropriate monitoring of maternal health and complications is underappreciated. Most clinical laboratories continue to use non-pregnant adult reference intervals for laboratory test interpretation in pregnancy. The current review summarizes and critically evaluates the available literature regarding physiological and metabolic adaptations in pregnancy and their influence on common biomarkers of health and disease. The main laboratory parameters discussed include thyroid, hepatic, metabolic, renal, hematology, inflammatory, and cardiac markers. Considering the available data, further studies are urgently needed to establish trimester-specific reference intervals in healthy pregnant women on updated analytical platforms. Without such data, the standard of clinical laboratory service in pregnancy remains compromised and affects the quality of maternal-fetal healthcare.

Method-dependent variation in TSH and FT4 reference intervals in pregnancy: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Gestational TSH and FT4 reference intervals may differ according to assay method, but the extent of variation is unclear and has not been systematically evaluated. We conducted a systematic review of published studies on TSH and FT4 reference intervals in pregnancy. Our aim was to quantify method-related differences in gestation reference intervals, across four commonly used assay methods, Abbott, Beckman, Roche and Siemens.

METHODS

We searched the literature for relevant studies, published between January 2000 and December 2020, in healthy pregnant women without thyroid antibodies or disease. For each study, we extracted trimester-specific reference intervals (2.5-97.5 percentiles) for TSH and FT4 as well as the manufacturer-provided reference interval for the corresponding non-pregnant population.

RESULTS

TSH reference intervals showed a wide range of study-to-study differences with upper limits ranging from 2.33 to 8.30 mU/L. FT4 lower limits ranged from 4.40 to 13.93 pmol/L, with consistently lower reference intervals observed with the Beckman method. Differences between non-pregnant and first trimester reference intervals were highly variable, and for most studies, the TSH upper limit in the first trimester could not be predicted or extrapolated from non-pregnant values.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms significant intra- and intermethod disparities in gestational thyroid hormone reference intervals. The relationship between pregnant and non-pregnant values is inconsistent and does not support the existing practice in many laboratories of extrapolating gestation references from non-pregnant values. Laboratories should invest in deriving method-specific gestation reference intervals for their population.

Thyroid Diseases During Pregnancy: Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Publications

BACKGROUND

Bibliometric analysis can analyze development trends and predict research hotspots. We used these analyses to better understand pregnancy-related implications of thyroid diseases.

METHODS

Publications on thyroid diseases during pregnancy from 1926 to hitherto were retrieved based on the Web of Science database. The publications and references, the institutions and countries, the journals, the keywords and citations, were analyzed by utilizing VOSviewer, CiteSpace and CitNetExplorer.

RESULTS

A total of 3310 publications were retrieved and were cited 87913 times. The United States took the dominant position in outputs and collaborations. Harvard University had the most articles 86, which also had the highest h-index 30. Thyroid ranked first with 201 publications and Journal of Clinical Endocrinology Metabolism had the highest h-index 67. Among the 49 burst keywords, "antibody" had the longest burst period from 1991 to 2012, "thyroxine" had the strongest burst strength 16.7026, "hypothyroxinemia" appeared most recently in 2018. The most frequent keyword was "pregnancy" occurred 1324 times. All the top 98 frequent keywords were clustered into 4 clusters. The citation network visualization was grouped into 8 groups.

CONCLUSION

The research focus of thyroid diseases in pregnancy ranged from clinical thyroid dysfunction to milder thyroid dysfunction. Guidelines published by the American Thyroid Association enacted a crucial purpose in the treatment and development of thyroid diseases during pregnancy. Some randomized controlled studies of unresolved problems and long-term follow-up of offspring may be the direction of future research. In the meantime, bibliometric methods can help scholars choose journals, track research hotspots, and identify the direction or focus of future research.

Management of thyrotoxicosis during pregnancy

Thyrotoxicosis during pregnancy should be adequately managed and controlled to prevent maternal and fetal complications. The evaluation of thyroid function in pregnant women is challenged by the physiological adaptations associated with pregnancy, and the treatment with antithyroid drugs (ATD) raises concerns for the pregnant woman and the fetus. Thyrotoxicosis in pregnant women is mainly of autoimmune origin, and the measurement of thyroid stimulating hormone-receptor antibodies (TRAb) plays a key role. TRAb helps to distinguish the hyperthyroidism of Graves' disease from gestational hyperthyroidism in early pregnancy, and to evaluate the risk of fetal and neonatal hyperthyroidism in late pregnancy. Furthermore, the measurement of TRAb in early pregnancy is recommended to evaluate the need for ATD during the teratogenic period of pregnancy. Observational studies have raised concern about the risk of birth defects associated with the use of ATD in early pregnancy and challenged the clinical management and choice of treatment.

Thyroid function reference ranges during pregnancy in a large Chinese population and comparison with current guidelines

Background:

A correct thyroid function reference range is important for the accurate diagnosis of thyroid disease during pregnancy. However, there is no consensus on whether thyroid function reference ranges in Chinese population should follow the America Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines. This study aimed to establish a thyroid function reference range more suited to the Chinese population by evaluating the current thyroid function reference range in pregnant Chinese women and comparing it to the ATA guidelines.

Methods:

A total of 52,027 pregnant women were enrolled from January 2013 to December 2016. Thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine (FT4), and thyroid peroxidase antibody (TPOAb) levels were tested during the first and third trimesters of pregnancy. Reference ranges of TSH and FT4 were established from the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles of the TPOAb-negative population of women. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare thyroid hormones between the TPOAb-positive and TPOAb-negative groups.

Results:

We obtained that the TSH reference ranges were 0.03 to 3.52 mU/L and 0.39 to 3.67 mU/L, and the FT4 reference ranges were 11.7 to 19.7 pmol/L and 9.1 to 14.4 pmol/L, in the first and third trimester, respectively. If we used the 2011 ATA criteria about 7.0% and 4.0% pregnant women would be over diagnosed in first and third trimester, respectively, compared with local population thyroid hormone reference. When we compared our local criteria with the new 2017 ATA criteria, about 1.2% and 0.8% pregnant women would have a missed diagnosis in first and third trimester, respectively.

Conclusions:

Based on our data, which is in line with the current ATA guidelines, a population-based thyroid function reference range would be the first choice for diagnosis of thyroid disease during pregnancy in China. In case such population-based thyroid function reference ranges are unavailable in the east of China, our reference ranges can be adopted, if the same assay is used.

Trial Registration:

www.chictr.org.cn (No. ChiCTR1800014394).

Pregnancy Week-Specific Reference Ranges for Thyrotropin and Free Thyroxine in the North Denmark Region Pregnancy Cohort

BACKGROUND

Physiological changes in maternal thyroid function during pregnancy necessitate the use of pregnancy-specific reference ranges. Dynamic changes in thyrotropin (TSH) within the first trimester of pregnancy have been reported, but more evidence is needed to substantiate the findings. The objective of this study was to estimate pregnancy week-specific reference ranges for maternal TSH and free thyroxine (fT4) in early pregnancy.

METHODS

The study consecutively recruited serum residues from blood samples collected as part of the prenatal screening in the North Denmark Region, 2011-2015. TSH, fT4, thyroid peroxidase antibodies (TPOAb), and thyroglobulin antibodies (TgAb) were measured using an ADVIA Centaur XPT immunoassay. The reference cohort included 10,337 pregnant women who had no thyroid disease or other autoimmune diseases and were TPOAb- and TgAb negative. The main outcome measures were lower and upper reference limits (2.5th and 97.5th percentiles) for TSH and fT4 stratified by week of pregnancy.

RESULTS

Blood samples were drawn in pregnancy weeks 4-20 (median week 10), and 92% of the pregnancies ended with a live birth. TSH varied considerably in the first trimester of pregnancy, and the levels were highest in early pregnancy (weeks 4-6: 0.6-3.7 mIU/L) followed by a gradual decline to lower levels in weeks 9-11 (0.1-2.8 mIU/L) and 12-14 (0.03-2.8 mIU/L). Maternal fT4 showed less variation (weeks 4-6: 12-20 pmol/L; weeks 9-11: 13-21 pmol/L; weeks 12-14: 13-20 pmol/L).

CONCLUSIONS

The results corroborate dynamic week-specific changes in maternal TSH in early pregnancy. The use of uniform lower and upper reference limits for TSH in early pregnancy may be too simple.

Frequency and outcomes of maternal thyroid function abnormalities in early pregnancy

Thyroid function in pregnant women is of clinical importance considering the crucial role of thyroid hormones during fetal brain development, but the current level of evidence is insufficient to recommend for or against the routine testing of thyroid function in pregnant women. As part of this debate, it is important to evaluate the frequency of undiagnosed and untreated thyroid function abnormalities in pregnant women and to address challenges related to the biochemical assessment of maternal thyroid function in early pregnancy. A hypothesis of fetal programming by maternal thyroid disease has been proposed, but more evidence in humans is needed to extend the hypothesis and to evaluate child neurodevelopmental outcomes after in utero exposure to different abnormalities in maternal thyroid function. The nationwide registers in the Nordic countries provide unique opportunities within reproductive epidemiology to study the impact of various in utero exposures, and stored blood samples from pregnant women in nationwide birth cohorts provide a valuable source for the establishment of pregnancy specific reference ranges. This review addresses the frequency and outcomes of thyroid function abnormalities in pregnant women mainly focusing on observational studies that combine data from the Danish nationwide registers and biological specimens from the Danish National Birth Cohort. Dynamic changes in the reference range of maternal TSH and free T4 during the first trimester of pregnancy are described and discussed. A high frequency of unidentified maternal thyroid function abnormalities is illustrated, and outcomes of child neurodevelopment are evaluated according to subtypes and severity of maternal thyroid dysfunction.

Laboratory Testing in Thyroid Conditions - Pitfalls and Clinical Utility

Thyroid disorders are common, affecting more than 10% of people in the US, and laboratory tests are integral in the management of these conditions. The repertoire of thyroid tests includes blood tests for thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine, free triiodothyronine, thyroglobulin (Tg), thyroglobulin antibodies (Tg-Ab), thyroid peroxidase antibodies (TPO-Ab), TSH receptor antibodies (TRAb), and calcitonin. TSH and free thyroid hormone tests are frequently used to assess the functional status of the thyroid. TPO-Ab and TRAb tests are used to diagnose Hashimoto's thyroiditis and Graves' disease, respectively. Tg and calcitonin are important tumor markers used in the management of differentiated thyroid carcinoma and medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC), respectively. Procalcitonin may replace calcitonin as a biomarker for MTC. Apart from understanding normal thyroid physiology, it is important to be familiar with the possible pitfalls and caveats in the use of these tests so that they can be interpreted properly and accurately. When results are discordant, clinicians and laboratorians should be mindful of possible assay interferences and/or the effects of concurrent medications. In addition, thyroid function may appear abnormal in the absence of actual thyroid dysfunction during pregnancy and in critical illness. Hence, it is important to consider the clinical context when interpreting results. This review aims to describe the above-mentioned blood tests used in the diagnosis and management of thyroid disorders, as well as the pitfalls in their interpretation. With due knowledge and care, clinicians and laboratorians will be able to fully appreciate the clinical utility of these important laboratory tests.

The Reference Intervals of Thyroid Hormones for Pregnant Women in Zhejiang Province

Gestation-specific reference intervals for thyroid hormones are used to estimate thyroid function in pregnant women. This study was to establish the reference intervals for pregnant women in Zhejiang province, China. A total of 9038 cases were recruited. The values of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine, free triiodothyronine, total thyroxine, and total triiodothyronine were determined by Beckman Coulter DxI-800 analyzers. Our results indicated that the level of TSH declined in the first trimester and then rose as pregnancy progressed. Conversely, the level of free triiodothyronine rose in the first trimester and then declined. The ranges of free thyroxine kept the decreasing trend crossing the gestation period. For total triiodothyronine, the ranges increased as pregnancy progressed and declined in the third trimester. The variation trends of total triiodothyronine and total thyroxine were similar. Our data confirmed the importance of the reference intervals of thyroid hormones for pregnant women.

Establishment of trimester-specific reference range for thyroid hormones during pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

Physiological gestational changes are associated with alterations in thyroid function which require different biochemical interpretation from that of non-pregnant women and necessitate established pregnancy-specific reference ranges. We aimed to identify the trimester-specific ranges of thyroid markers in a healthy population of pregnant Iranian women.

METHODS

In this self-sequential study, data were extracted from The Tehran Thyroid and Pregnancy Study; a total of 314 women were tested during the 1st, 2nd and 3rd trimesters for serum levels of thyrotropin (TSH), thyroxine (T4), free thyroxine index (FT4I) and thyroid peroxidase antibody (TPOAb). Trimester-specific reference intervals for TSH, T4 and FT4I and first trimester reference range for TPOAb were estimated. The normal and modulus exponential-normal models were fitted by maximum likelihood using STATA software. The 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles of thyroid parameters were determined and used as reference intervals.

RESULTS

Mean±SD age of participants was 26.8±5.2years. Estimated reference intervals for TSH, T4 and FT4I in the 1st, 2nd and 3rd trimesters corresponding to the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles were 0.14-6.14, 0.43-4.64, 0.63-3.9μIU/ml; 78.01-215.19, 93.23-243.87, 89.61-211.37nmol/L; and 1.73-4.53, 1.96-5.64, 1.72-4.30, respectively. Reference interval for TPOAb in the 1st trimester was 1.40-38.02IU/mL. Median of TSH was low in the 1st trimester, and gradually increased until 2nd trimester, followed by a slight decrease onward. A decreasing trend in TSH levels was observed in higher centiles with advancing gestational age.

CONCLUSION

This study provides trimester-specific reference ranges for some common thyroid markers among healthy Iranian women in an iodine sufficient area, to prevent biochemical misinterpretations during pregnancy.

Gestational age-specific reference intervals for serum thyroid hormone levels in a multi-ethnic population

BACKGROUND

Thyroid disorders are common during pregnancy. To date, a limited number of studies have reported differences in serum thyroid hormone concentrations between different ethnic groups. We sought to establish gestational age-specific reference intervals for serum levels of thyroid hormones in a multi-ethnic population and investigate whether separate reference intervals should be used for different ethnic groups.

METHODS

A total of 926 pregnant women from multiple ethnic groups attended four separate study visits spanning the three trimesters. Venous blood samples were taken at 9 to 14 weeks, 18 to 22 weeks, 28 to 32 weeks, and 34 to 39 weeks of gestation. Serum concentrations of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine (T4), free triiodothyronine (T3), total T4, total T3, thyroid peroxidase antibody and thyroglobulin antibody were measured using Abbott Architect immunoassays. A total of 562 women with singleton pregnancies were found to be negative for both thyroid autoantibodies at all four study visits and thus included in the reference sample group for the establishment of reference intervals (2.5th to 97.5th percentiles).

RESULTS

Reference intervals for serum thyroid hormones at 9-14 weeks of gestation derived from the combined group of pregnant women are as follows: TSH, 0.01-2.39 mIU/L; free T4, 11.4-19.5 pmol/L; free T3, 4.23-6.69 pmol/L; total T4, 77.8-182.4 nmol/L; total T3, 1.39-2.97 nmol/L. No differences in the five thyroid parameters' reference intervals are detectable among the ethnic groups except that at study visit 3 (28-32 weeks of gestation), the upper reference limit of total T3 in Malays (3.20 nmol/L; 90% CI, 2.99-3.76 nmol/L) is slightly higher than that in Chinese (2.86 nmol/L; 90% CI, 2.70-2.98 nmol/L).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings from this study on a multi-ethnic cohort highlight the importance of establishing locally derived and gestational age-specific reference intervals for the five thyroid hormone parameters.

Comparison of the Reference Intervals Used for the Evaluation of Maternal Thyroid Function During Pregnancy Using Sequential and Nonsequential Methods

BACKGROUND

Maternal thyroid dysfunction is common during pregnancy, and physiological changes during pregnancy can lead to the overdiagnosis of hyperthyroidism and misdiagnosis of hypothyroidism with nongestation-specific reference intervals. Our aim was to compare sequential with nonsequential methods for the evaluation of thyroid function in pregnant women.

METHODS

We tested pregnant women who underwent their trimester prenatal screening at our hospital from February 2011 to September 2012 for serum thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) and free thyroxine (FT4) using the Abbott and Roche kits. There were 447 and 200 patients enrolled in the nonsequential and sequential groups, respectively. The central 95% range between the 2.5th and the 97.5th percentiles was used as the reference interval for the thyroid function parameter.

RESULTS

The nonsequential group exhibited a significantly larger degree of dispersion in the TSH reference interval during the 2nd and 3rd trimesters as measured using both the Abbott and Roche kits (all P < 0.05). The TSH reference intervals were significantly larger in the nonsequential group than in the sequential group during the 3rd trimester as measured with both the Abbott (4.95 vs. 3.77 mU/L, P < 0.001) and Roche kits (6.62 vs. 5.01 mU/L, P = 0.004). The nonsequential group had a significantly larger FT4 reference interval as measured with the Abbott kit during all trimesters (12.64 vs. 5.82 pmol/L; 7.96 vs. 4.77 pmol/L; 8.10 vs. 4.77 pmol/L, respectively, all P < 0.05), whereas a significantly larger FT4 reference interval was only observed during the 2nd trimester with the Roche kit (7.76 vs. 5.52 pmol/L, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

It was more reasonable to establish reference intervals for the evaluation of maternal thyroid function using the sequential method during each trimester of pregnancy. Moreover, the exclusion of pregnancy-related complications should be considered in the inclusion criteria for thyroid function tests.

Thyroid in pregnancy: From physiology to screening

Thyroid hormones are crucial for the growth and maturation of many target tissues, especially the brain and skeleton. During critical periods in the first trimester of pregnancy, maternal thyroxine is essential for fetal development as it supplies thyroid hormone-dependent tissues. The ontogeny of mature thyroid function involves organogenesis, and maturation of the hypothalamus, pituitary and the thyroid gland; and it is almost complete by the 12th-14th gestational week. In case of maternal hypothyroidism, substitution with levothyroxine must be started in early pregnancy. After the 14th gestational week, fetal brain development may already be irreversibly affected by lack of thyroid hormones. The prevalence of manifest hypothyroidism in pregnancy is about 0.3-0.5%. The prevalence of subclinical hypothyroidism varies between 4 and 17%, strongly depending on the definition of the upper TSH cutoff limit. Hyperthyroidism occurs in 0.1-1% of all pregnancies. Positivity for antibodies against thyroid peroxidase (TPOAb) is common in women of childbearing age with an incidence rate of 5.1-12.4%. TPOAb-positivity may be regarded as a manifestation of a general autoimmune state which may alter the fertilization and implantation processes or cause early missed abortions. Women positive for TPOAb are at a significant risk of developing hypothyroidism during pregnancy and postpartum. Laboratory diagnosis of thyroid dysfunction during pregnancy is based upon serum TSH concentration. TSH in pregnancy is physiologically lower than the non-pregnant population. Results of multiple international studies point toward creation of trimester-specific reference intervals for TSH in pregnancy. Screening for hypothyroidism in pregnancy is controversial and its implementation varies from country to country. Currently, the case-finding approach of screening high-risk women is preferred in most countries to universal screening. However, numerous studies have shown that one-third to one-half of women with thyroid disorders escape the case-finding approach. Moreover, the universal screening has been shown to be more cost-effective. Screening for thyroid disorders in pregnancy should include assessment of both TSH and TPOAb, regardless of the screening approach. This review summarizes the current knowledge on physiology of thyroid hormones in pregnancy, causes of maternal thyroid dysfunction and its effects on pregnancy course and fetal development. We discuss the question of case-finding versus universal screening strategies and we display an overview of the analytical methods and their reference intervals in the assessment of thyroid function and thyroid autoimmunity in pregnancy. Finally, we present our results supporting the implementation of universal screening.

Trimester-specific thyroid hormone reference ranges in Sudanese women

BACKGROUND

Trimester-specific reference ranges for T3, T4, and TSH need to be established in different communities. Neither Sudan nor other African countries have established trimester-specific reference ranges for TSH, free T3 (FT3), and free T4 (FT4) in healthy pregnant women. This study aimed to establish trimester-specific reference ranges for TSH, FT3, and FT4 in healthy pregnant Sudanese women.

RESULTS

We performed a longitudinal study, which included 63 women with singleton pregnancies who were followed since early pregnancy until the third trimester. The study was performed in Saad Abu-Alela Hospital, Khartoum, Sudan, during January to October 2014. An equal number of age- and parity-matched non-pregnant women were enrolled as a control group. Basic clinical and obstetrics data were gathered using questionnaires. TSH, FT3, and FT4 levels were measured. Median (5th-95th centile) values of TSH, FT3, and FT4 were 1.164 IU/ml (0.079-2.177 IU/ml), 4.639 nmol/l (3.843-6.562 nmol/l), and 16.86 pmol/l (13.02-31.48 pmol/l) in the first trimester. Median values of TSH, FT3, and FT4 were 1.364 IU/ml (0.540-2.521 IU/ml), 4.347 nmol/l (3.425-5.447 nmol/l), and 13.51 pmol/l (11.04-31.07 pmol/l) in the second trimester. These values were 1.445 IU/ml (0.588-2.460 IU/ml), 4.132 nmol/l (3.176-5.164 nmol/l), and 12.87 pmol/l (9.807-23.78 pmol/l) in the third trimester, respectively. TSH levels increased throughout the trimesters. FT3 and FT4 levels were significantly higher in the first trimester compared with the second and third trimesters. TSH, FT3, and FT4 levels were significantly lower in pregnant women compared with non-pregnant women (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study is the first to establish trimester-specific reference ranges of TSH, FT3, and FT4 in Sudanese women with normal pregnancies. Our results suggest that pregnancy is likely to suppress TSH, T3, and T4 levels in healthy women.

Trimester- and Assay-Specific Thyroid Reference Intervals for Pregnant Women in China

Objective. The guidelines of the American Thyroid Association (ATA) recommend an upper limit reference interval (RI) of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) of 2.5 mIU/L in the first trimester of pregnancy and 3.0 mIU/L in subsequent trimesters, but some reported ranges in China are significantly higher. Our study aimed to establish trimester- and assay-specific RIs for thyroid hormones in normal pregnant Chinese women. Methods. In this cross-sectional study, 2540 women with normal pregnancies (first trimester, n = 398; second trimester, n = 797; third trimester, n = 1345) and 237 healthy nonpregnant control subjects were recruited. Serum TSH, free thyroxin (FT4), thyroid peroxidase antibody (TPOAb), and thyroglobulin antibody (TgAb) levels were determined by automated chemiluminescence with an Immulite 2000 system (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). After outliers were excluded, the 2.5-97.5th percentiles were used to define the RIs. Results. The RIs of thyroid function in the first, second, and third trimesters of pregnancy and in nonpregnant controls were 0.07-3.96, 0.27-4.53, 0.48-5.40, and 0.69-5.78 mIU/L for TSH and 9.16-18.12, 8.67-16.21, 7.80-13.90, and 8.24-16.61 pmol/L for FT4, respectively. Conclusion. The trimester- and assay-specific RIs of thyroid function during pregnancy differed between trimesters, which suggests that it is advisable to detect and avoid misclassification of thyroid dysfunction during pregnancy for women in Henan, China.