Analytical evaluation of the novel soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 and placental growth factor assays for the diagnosis of preeclampsia

The Management of Preeclampsia: A Comprehensive Review of Current Practices and Future Directions

Preeclampsia (PE) is a disease in pregnancy that is characterized by new-onset hypertension end-organ dysfunction, often occurring after 20 weeks of gestation. Risk factors include a prior history of PE, diabetes, kidney disease, obesity, and high maternal age at pregnancy. Current treatment and management guidelines focus on the management of high blood pressure and any potential complications. The only known curative treatment is termination of pregnancy (either induction of delivery or cesarean section). However, the current guidelines and recommendations lack adequate prediction markers and are unable to prevent maternal and fetal mortality. There also exists a need for multidisciplinary collaborative action in view of the quality of life and psycho-educational counseling.

Advances in preeclampsia testing

Preeclampsia is a multisystem hypertensive disorder and one of the leading causes of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. The clinical hallmarks such as hypertension and proteinuria, and additional laboratory tests currently available including liver enzyme testing, are neither specific nor sufficiently sensitive. Therefore, biomarkers for timely and accurate identification of patients at risk of developing preeclampsia are extremely valuable to improve patient outcomes and safety. In this chapter, we will first discuss the clinical characteristics of preeclampsia and current evidence of the role of angiogenic factors, such as placental growth factor (PlGF) and soluble FMS like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1) in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Second, we will review the clinical practice guidelines for preeclampsia diagnostic criteria and their recommendations on laboratory testing. Third, we will review the currently available PlGF and sFlt-1 assays in terms of their methodologies, analytical performance, and clinical diagnostic values. Finally, we will discuss the future research needs from both an analytical and clinical perspective.

Analytical Performance and Quality Indicators of Fully Automated Immunoassays for sFlt-1 and PlGF

BACKGROUND

The ratio of the antiangiogenic factor, soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1), to the proangiogenic factor, placental growth factor (PlGF), is associated with increased risk of preeclampsia. Here, we describe an analytical evaluation of the Elecsys sFlt-1 and PlGF assays at the first North American site in which they were clinically implemented.

METHODS

The analytical evaluation included short- and long-term imprecision, method comparison, accuracy, linearity, sample stability, limit of quantification verification, and measurement uncertainty. Quality indicators were also evaluated, including turnaround time and repeat test frequency.

RESULTS

Short-term (13-day) and long-term (12-month) imprecision for sFlt-1 and PlGF were <4% CV. Method comparison (n = 40) between Roche cobas e602 and e411 exhibited r > 0.99 and bias <10%. sFlt-1/PlGF ratio rule-out cutoffs (≤33 and ≤38) and rule-in cutoffs (>38, >85, and >110) exhibited negative percent agreement and positive percent agreement of 100%, respectively (n = 40). During the first 12 months, 257 orders were placed, repeat test frequency was 17.5%, mean time between repeat orders was 23 days, and 72.0% of results were reported within 2 h from sample receipt when quality control was run continuously.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe analytical performance parameters and quality indicators of the Elecsys sFlt-1 and PlGF assays, which was the first North American clinical laboratory site to implement these assays in support of the institution's high-risk obstetrical unit.

Decision Threshold for Kryptor sFlt-1/PlGF Ratio in Women With Suspected Preeclampsia: Retrospective Study in a Routine Clinical Setting

Background The objective was to evaluate predictive performance and optimal decision threshold of the Kryptor soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1)/placental growth factor (PlGF) ratio when implemented for routine management of women presenting with symptoms of preeclampsia. Methods and Results Observational retrospective study of a cohort of 501 women with suspected preeclampsia after 20 weeks of gestation. Women referred to maternity ward for observation of preeclampsia had an sFlt-1/PlGF ratio test included in routine diagnostic workup. Maternal and offspring characteristic data included maternal risk factors, outcomes, delivery mode, and indication for suspected preeclampsia. Biochemical measurements to determine sFlt-1/PlGF ratio were performed using the BRAHMS/Kryptor sFlt-1/PlGF ratio immunoassays. Results were analyzed by area under receiver-operating characteristic curve. Preeclampsia occurred in 150 of 501 (30%) of symptomatic women with an sFlt-1/PlGF ratio determined before the time of diagnosis. Area under receiver-operating characteristic curve for diagnosis of early-onset preeclampsia within 1 and 4 weeks was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.96-1.00) and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.98), respectively. For late-onset preeclampsia, predictive performance within 1 and 4 weeks was lower: 0.90 (95% CI, 0.85-0.94) and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.80-0.90), respectively. The optimal single sFlt-1/PlGF ratio threshold for all preeclampsia and late-onset preeclampsia within 1 and 4 weeks was 66. The negative and positive predictive values for ruling out and ruling in developing preeclampsia within 1 week were 96% and 70%, respectively. Conclusions The Kryptor sFlt-1/PlGF ratio is a useful clinical tool ruling out and in preeclampsia within 1 week. Prediction within 4 weeks is superior for early-onset preeclampsia. A single decision threshold of 66 is indicated for use in clinical routine.

Applying the concept of uncertainty to the sFlt-1/PlGF cut-offs for diagnosis and prognosis of preeclampsia

OBJECTIVES

Placental growth factor (PlGF) and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) assays and the corresponding ratios (sFlt-1/PlGF) have been proposed to aid in the diagnosis by exclusion and/or prognosis of preeclampsia (PE). A method for evaluating ratio uncertainties (RUs), based on the theory of error propagation, was applied to the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio.

METHODS

RUs were calculated using data derived from sFlt-1 and PlGF Internal Quality Control (IQC) results collected from four centers using Elecsys (Roche) or Kryptor (Thermo Fisher) sFlt-1 and PlGF assays. The corresponding ratio uncertainties were defined for each ratio value.

RESULTS

The RUs increased linearly with the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio values. The Elecsys RUs were lower than the Kryptor RUs. Although RUs cannot eliminate differences in ratio values observed among various immunoassays, it can affect interpretation of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio, especially when results are within the range of predefined PE diagnosis or prognosis cut-offs.

CONCLUSIONS

Since RUs are only a function of PlGF and sFlt-1 precision, they can be calculated for each assay from each laboratory to adjust the interpretation of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio results in the context of PE.

Correlation of Kryptor and Elecsys® immunoassay sFlt-1/PlGF ratio on early diagnosis of preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction: A case-control study

OBJECTIVES

The measurement of the soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 to placental growth factor (sFlt-1/PlGF) ratio on automated platforms has improved the detection of preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction (PE/FGR). The cut-off points of >38 and ≥85 has been defined for "rule in" and "aid in diagnosis", respectively, using the Elecsys® platform. We aimed to compare the performance of these cut-offs between the Elecsys® and Kryptor platforms at 24-28 weeks.

STUDY DESIGN

Observational case-control study of singleton pregnancies at high risk for PE/FGR and sFlt-1/PlGF measurement at 24-28 weeks' gestation: 21 cases (9 early PE/FGR with delivery <32 weeks) were 1:1 matched for body mass index and parity with 21 controls. Correlations of the sFlt-1, PlGF and sFlt-1/PlGF values and diagnostic accuracy of the >38 and ≥85 cutoffs for early and late PE/FGR using Elecsys® and Kryptor assays were evaluated.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

PE/FGR cases showed significantly higher median (IQR) sFlt-1/PlGF values at 24-28 weeks vs. controls, using both Elecsys® and Kryptor platforms: 55 (13-254) and 97 (13-530) vs. 4.1 (2.0-6.5) and 3.9 (1.8-7.7), respectively. The sFlt-1/PlGF correlation between both methods was excellent (r² = 0.95) although lower PlGF and higher sFlt-1/PlGF values were observed with Kryptor. The higher diagnostic accuracy was obtained for early PE/FGR with the ≥85 cutoff (95.2%; 95%CI: 83.8-99.4%) in both platforms.

CONCLUSION

sFlt-1/PlGF measurements correlates well between Elecsys® and Kryptor platforms, and the cutoffs of >38 and ≥85 exhibit high diagnostic accuracy for assessing early PE/FGR at 24-28 weeks with both methods.

Role of sFlt-1 and PlGF in the screening of small-for-gestational age neonates during pregnancy: A systematic review

Background

Fetal growth restriction, i.e. the restriction of genetically predetermined growth potential due to placental dysfunction, is a major cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. The consequences of inadequate fetal growth can be life-long, but the risks can be reduced substantially if the condition is identified prenatally. Currently, screening strategies are based on ultrasound detection of a small-for-gestational age fetus and do not take into account the underlying vascular pathology in the placenta. Measurement of maternal circulating angiogenic biomarkers placental growth factor, sFlt-1 (soluble FMS-like tyrosine kinase-1) are increasingly used in studies on fetal growth restriction as they reflect the pathophysiological process in the placenta. However, interpretation of the role of angiogenic biomarkers in prediction of fetal growth restriction is hampered by the varying design, population, timing, assay technique and cut-off values used in these studies.

Methods

We conducted a systematic-review in PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE (Ovid) and Cochrane to explore the predictive performance of maternal concentrations of placental growth factor, sFlt-1 and their ratio for fetal growth restriction and small-for-gestational age, at different gestational ages, and describe the longitudinal changes in biomarker concentrations and optimal discriminatory cut-off values.

Results

We included 26 studies with 2514 cases with small-for-gestational age, 27 cases of fetal growth restriction, 582 cases mixed small-for-gestational age/fetal growth restriction and 29,374 reference. The largest mean differences for the two biomarkers and their ratio were found after 26 weeks of gestational age and not in the first trimester. The ROC-AUC varied between 0.60 and 0.89 with sensitivity and specificity matching the different cut-off values or a preset false-positive rate of 10%.

Conclusions

Most of the studies did not make a distinction between small-for-gestational age and fetal growth restriction, and therefore the small-for-gestational age group consists of fetuses with growth restriction and fetuses that are constitutionally normal. The biomarkers can be a valuable screening tool for small-for-gestational age pregnancies, but unfortunately, there is not yet a clear cut-off value to use for screening. More research is needed to see if these biomarkers are sufficiently able to differentiate growth restriction on their own and how these biomarkers in combination with other relevant clinical and ultrasound parameters can be used in clinical routine diagnostics.

Elecsys® and Kryptor immunoassays for the measurement of sFlt-1 and PlGF to aid preeclampsia diagnosis: are they comparable?

Background

For pregnant women with suspected preeclampsia, the soluble fms-like tyrosine-kinase 1 (sFlt-1)/placental growth factor (PlGF) ratio is a biomarker to aid diagnosis. We performed method comparisons between Elecsys® and Kryptor sFlt-1 and PlGF immunoassays and assessed the diagnostic performance for preeclampsia.

Methods

Serum samples from a case-control study involving 113 pregnant women with preeclampsia/elevated liver enzymes and low platelet count (HELLP) and 270 controls were analyzed. sFlt-1 and PlGF were measured using Roche Elecsys® and BRAHMS Kryptor sFlt-1/PlGF immunoassays. The sFlt-1/PlGF ratios were calculated, and Passing-Bablok regression/Bland-Altman plots were performed. Gestation-specific cut-offs, ≤33 and ≥85/≥110, were assessed.

Results

Mean (±2 standard deviation [SD]) differences between the Elecsys® and Kryptor values were: sFlt-1, 173.13 pg/mL (6237.66, −5891.40); PlGF, −102.71 pg/mL (186.06, −391.48); and sFlt-1/PlGF, 151.74 (1085.11, −781.63). The Elecsys® and Kryptor immunoassays showed high correlation: Pearson’s correlation coefficients were 0.913 (sFlt-1) and 0.945 (PlGF). Slopes were 1.06 (sFlt-1) and 0.79 (PlGF), resulting in ~20% lower values for Kryptor PlGF. Sensitivities and specificities using the sFlt-1/PlGF ≥85 cut-off for early-onset preeclampsia (20 + 0 to 33 + 6 weeks) were 88.1%/100.0% (Elecsys®) and 90.5%/96.2% (Kryptor), respectively, and using the ≥110 cut-off for late-onset preeclampsia (≥34 + 0 weeks) were 51.3%/96.5% (Elecsys®) and 78.9%/90.1% (Kryptor), respectively. Using Elecsys® and Kryptor sFlt-1/PlGF, 0% and 3.8% of women, respectively, were falsely ruled-in for early-onset, and 3.5% and 9.9%, respectively, for late-onset preeclampsia.

Conclusions

Despite high correlation between the Elecsys® and Kryptor immunoassays, we observed significant differences between sFlt-1/PlGF and PlGF results. Therefore, sFlt-1/PlGF cut-offs validated for Elecsys® immunoassays are not transferable to Kryptor immunoassays.

Intrauterine growth restriction, soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 to placental growth factor ratio increase and preeclampsia

BACKGROUND

Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and preeclampsia (PE) share common features such as ischemic placental disease but also differ in their clinical expression regarding maternal diseases. The reason why IUGRremains isolated in some cases yet is followed by clinical manifestations of PE in other cases remains unexplained.

CASE REPORT

A 40-year old woman, gravida two, para one, experienced early-onset IUGR with a significant increase in the ratio of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1) to placental growth factor (PlGF) but, surprisingly, without any maternal clinical manifestations of PE.

CONCLUSION

IUGR and a significant increase in sFlt-1/PlGF ratio without PE raise the issue of a missing factor enabling IUGR, a significant increase in sFlt-1/PlGF ratio, and PE to be linked. TEACHING POINTS: (1) Early-onset IUGR and a significant increase in sFlt-1/PlGF ratio do not necessarily mean the onset of PE. (2) Combining early-onset IUGR and a significant increase in sFlt-1/PlGF ratio without PE raises the question of an additional factor responsible for the onset of PE.

[Potential value of placental angiogenic factors as biomarkers in preeclampsia for clinical physicians]

The role of angiogenic factors in the onset of clinical manifestations of preeclampsia was demonstrated in 2003 by the implication of sFlt-1, PlGF and VEGF, and in 2006 by the implication of soluble endoglin. Placental ischemia and inflammation observed in preeclampsia alter both the production and progression of angiogenic factors during pregnancy. During the first trimester, the combination of PlGF with clinical, biophysical and biological factors results in a better test than the conventional one. However, the clinical value of this method remains to be confirmed. During the second and third trimesters, the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio may be used, with or without pre-existing renal disease, for short-term prediction, diagnosis, and prognosis, and to evaluate the effectiveness of preeclampsia treatment. While a sFlt-1/PlGF ratio<38 and≤33, respectively, rules out the short-term onset and diagnosis of preeclampsia, a sFlt-1/PlGF ratio≥85 between 20 and 34 weeks of pregnancy and≥110 beyond 34 weeks of pregnancy confirms a diagnosis of preeclampsia. Angiogenic and non-angiogenic preeclampsia are identified by a sFlt-1PlGF≥85 and<85, respectively, with the risk of maternal and fetal complications at two weeks differing between the two. Similarly, a sFlt-1/PlGF ratio>665 and>205, respectively, is a good short-term predictor of adverse outcomes of early and late-onset preeclampsia. These values could be incorporated into future guidelines for better clinical management of preeclampsia.

Predictive value of sFlt-1, PlGF, sFlt-1/PlGF ratio and PAPP-A for late-onset preeclampsia and IUGR between 32 and 37 weeks of pregnancy

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate, whether maternal serum levels of sFlt-1, PlGF and PAPP-A at third trimester of pregnancy are associated with late-onset PE and intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) after 34 weeks of pregnancy.

METHODS

This was a prospective study measuring the maternal serum levels of soluble tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1), placental growth factor (PlGF) and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) at 32-37 weeks of pregnancy: 730 patients were enrolled and 676 had neither intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) nor preeclampsia (PE) or pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH) throughout the pregnancy. 22 patients developed IUGR, 32 PE and 24 PIH.

RESULTS

Linear regression analyses after adjusting for maternal age, gestational age at the blood sampling and maternal BMI showed associations between PE and serum sFlt-1 levels (Exp(ß) = 3.29; 95% CI: 2.69-4.04), serum PlGF levels (Exp(ß) = 0.18; 95% CI: 0.13-0.24), sFlt-1/PlGF ratio (Exp(ß) = 15.59; 95% CI: 10.64-22.84) and serum PAPP-A (Exp(ß) = 1.48; 95% CI 1.15-1.89). sFlt-1, PlGF and sFlt-1/PlGF-Ratio showed comparable area under the curve (AUC) estimates with a predictive ability to discriminate pregnancies developing PE and IUGR from controls. The predictive ability of PAPP-A for PE was only slightly better than chance.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supported the ability of a single measurement of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio at third trimester to predict PE and IUGR occurring after 34 weeks of pregnancy. However, larger multicentre studies are needed to replicate our results.

Placental growth factor (alone or in combination with soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1) as an aid to the assessment of women with suspected pre-eclampsia: systematic review and economic analysis

BACKGROUND

Pre-eclampsia (PE) prediction based on blood pressure, presence of protein in the urine, symptoms and laboratory test abnormalities can result in false-positive diagnoses. This may lead to unnecessary antenatal admissions and preterm delivery. Blood tests that measure placental growth factor (PlGF) or the ratio of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1) to PlGF could aid prediction of PE if either were added to routine clinical assessment or used as a replacement for proteinuria testing.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of PlGF-based tests for patients referred to secondary care with suspected PE in weeks 20-37 of pregnancy.

DESIGN

Systematic reviews and an economic analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Bibliographic databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects were searched up to July 2015 for English-language references. Conferences, websites, systematic reviews and confidential company submissions were also accessed.

REVIEW METHODS

Systematic reviews of test accuracy and economic studies were conducted to inform an economic analysis. Test accuracy studies were required to include women with suspected PE and report quantitatively the accuracy of PlGF-based tests; their risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) criteria. The economic studies review had broad eligibility criteria to capture any types of economic analysis; critical appraisal employed standard checklists consistent with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence criteria. Study selection, critical appraisal and data extraction in both reviews were performed by two reviewers.

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

An independent economic analysis was conducted based on a decision tree model, using the best evidence available. The model evaluates costs (2014, GBP) from a NHS and Personal Social Services perspective. Given the short analysis time horizon, no discounting was undertaken.

RESULTS

Four studies were included in the systematic review of test accuracy: two on Alere's Triage^® PlGF test (Alere, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) for predicting PE requiring delivery within a specified time and two on Roche Diagnostics' Elecsys^® sFlt-1 to PlGF ratio test (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) for predicting PE within a specified time. Three studies were included in the systematic review of economic studies, and two confidential company economic analyses were assessed separately. Study heterogeneity precluded meta-analyses of test accuracy or cost-analysis outcomes, so narrative syntheses were conducted to inform the independent economic model. The model predicts that, when supplementing routine clinical assessment for rule-out and rule-in of PE, the two tests would be cost-saving in weeks 20-35 of gestation, and marginally cost-saving in weeks 35-37, but with minuscule impact on quality of life. Length of neonatal intensive care unit stay was the most influential parameter in sensitivity analyses. All other sensitivity analyses had negligible effects on results.

LIMITATIONS

No head-to-head comparisons of the tests were identified. No studies investigated accuracy of PlGF-based tests when used as a replacement for proteinuria testing. Test accuracy studies were found to be at high risk of clinical review bias.

CONCLUSIONS

The Triage and Elecsys tests would save money if added to routine clinical assessment for PE. The magnitude of savings is uncertain, but the tests remain cost-saving under worst-case assumptions. Further research is required to clarify how the test results would be interpreted and applied in clinical practice.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42015017670.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Dual-cutoff of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in the stratification of preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To systematically review the approach of using two independent sFlt-1/PlGF cutoffs that has better sensitivity (cutoff-sen) and specificity (cutoff-spe) separately for risk stratification in the detection of preeclampsia.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase databases and reference lists were searched up to June 2016. Inclusion criteria were blood samples for sFlt-1/PlGF with separate cutoffs (cutoff-sen and cutoff-spe) provided. Six relevant studies were identified. Pooling of results was done based on three studies and a systematic review was performed based on all six.

RESULTS

The strategy of using a cutoff of ≤33 and ≥85 for early onset preeclampsia, and ≤33 and ≥110 for the late onset preeclampsia was proposed and examined. The pooled sensitivity for cutoff-sen was: 95.3% (90.6-98.1%) and 88.6% (82.9-92.9%) for early and late onset preeclampsia, respectively. The pooled specificity for cutoff-spe was: 97.6% (95.2-98.9%) and 94.2% (91.4-96.3%) for early and late onset preeclampsia respectively. The pooled estimation of the early onset pre-eclamptic pregnancies and control normal pregnancies classified in the equivocal zone was 4.9% (2.0-8.8%) and 32.4% (25.7-39.5%), respectively, and 26.8% (10.3-47.6%) and 8.7% (3.0-17.6%) for late onset patients.

CONCLUSION

The new dual-cutoff diagnostic system optimizes the predictive performance of the single cutoff system. Further studies are required to assess the performance of this system and to define the approach and frequency at which subjects in the equivocal zone should be screened.