Establishing evidence-based thresholds and laboratory practices to reduce inappropriate treatment of pseudohyperkalemia. Clin Biochem. 2017;50:663-669. [PMID: 28288853 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.03.007]

Pseudonormokalemia case report - What does it mean to have normal blood potassium?

This case report describes a case of pseudonormokalemia, true hypokalemia. Often, only laboratory values outside the normal range gain attention and false normal results are at risk of not being noticed. However, a disease state may be masked by another pathological process. Here, a 50-year old male was admitted to the Department of Internal Medicine due to sepsis from a dental infection. Initially, serum potassium measurement revealed a normal value of 4 mmol/L (reference interval 3.8-5.1 mmol/L). Thrombocyte number was above 500x109/L. Due to our policy to recommend a repeated measurement of potassium in whole blood or heparin plasma if a patient has thrombocytosis, pseudonormokalemia was identified because the heparin plasma potassium value was only 2.9 mmol/L (reference interval 3.5-4.8 mmol/L). The physiological difference between serum and plasma concentration is no more than 0.3 mmol/L. In this case, potassium concentration were falsely elevated in the serum sample, probably caused by the high number of platelets releasing potassium during clotting. Interpretative comments in patients with thrombocytosis over 500x109/L recommending plasma potassium measurement are helpful. The best way to eliminate pseudohyperkalemia and pseudonormokalemia phenomena caused by thrombocytosis is to completely change towards heparin plasma as the standard material.

A rare case of essential thrombocythemia with pseudo-hyperkalemia

Essential thrombocythemia (ET) is a rare clonal stem cell disorder that affects the production of platelets in the bone marrow. This condition causes an overproduction of platelets, which can lead to blood clots and other complications. Potassium, on the other hand, is an essential mineral that plays a vital role in various bodily functions, including nerve impulses and muscle contractions. Here, in this case report, we investigated a case of pseudo-hyperkalemia caused by essential thrombocythemia in a 77-year-old woman with very high platelet counts. Moreover, this case report, which has no similar examples in the literature review, is important for clinicians.

The stability of blood gases and CO-oximetry under slushed ice and room temperature conditions

OBJECTIVES

Human blood gas stability data is limited to small sample sizes and questionable statistical techniques. We sought to determine the stability of blood gases under room temperature and slushed iced conditions in patients using survival analyses.

METHODS

Whole blood samples from ∼200 patients were stored in plastic syringes and kept at room temperature (22-24 °C) or in slushed ice (0.1-0.2 °C) before analysis. Arterial and venous pO2 (15-150 mmHg), pCO2 (16-72 mmHg), pH (6.73-7.52), and the CO-oximetry panel [total hemoglobin (5.4-19.3 g/dL), percentages of oxyhemoglobin (O2Hb%, 20-99%), carboxyhemoglobin (COHb, 0.1-5.4%) and methemoglobin (MetHb, 0.2-4.6%)], were measured over 5-time points. The Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia's (RCPA's) criteria determined analyte instability. Survival analyses identified storage times at which 5% of the samples for various analytes became unstable.

RESULTS

COHb and MetHb were stable up to 3 h in slushed ice and at room temperature; pCO2, pH was stable at room temperature for about 60 min and 3 h in slushed ice. Slushed ice shortened the storage time before pO2 became unstable (from 40 to 20 min), and the instability increased when baseline pO2 was ≥60 mmHg. The storage time for pO2, pCO2, pH, and CO-oximetry, when measured together, were limited by the pO2.

CONCLUSIONS

When assessing pO2 in plastic syringes, samples kept in slushed ice harm their stability. For simplicity's sake, the data support storage times for blood gas and CO-oximetry panels of up to 40 min at room temperature if following RCPA guidelines.

Erroneous potassium results: preanalytical causes, detection, and corrective actions

Potassium is one of the most requested laboratory tests. Its level is carefully monitored and maintained in a narrow physiological range. Even slightly altered potassium values may severely impact the patient's health, which is why an accurate and reliable result is of such importance. Even if high-quality analytics are available, there are still numerous ways in which potassium measurements may be biased, all of which occur in the preanalytical phase of the total laboratory testing process. As these results do not reflect the patient's in-vivo status, such results are referred to as pseudo-hyper/hypokalemia or indeed pseudo-normokalemia, depending on the true potassium result. Our goal in this review is to present an in-depth analysis of preanalytical errors that may result in inaccurate potassium results. After reviewing existing evidence on this topic, we classified preanalytical errors impacting potassium results into 4 categories: 1) patient factors like high platelet, leukocytes, or erythrocyte counts; 2) the sample type 3) the blood collection procedure, including inappropriate equipment, patient preparation, sample contamination and others and 4) the tube processing. The latter two include sample transport and storage conditions of whole blood, plasma, or serum as well as sample separation and subsequent preanalytical processes. In particular, we discuss the contribution of hemolysis, as one of the most frequent preanalytical errors, to pseudo-hyperkalemia. We provide a practical flow chart and a tabular overview of all the discussed preanalytical errors including possible underlying mechanisms, indicators for detection, suggestions for corrective actions, and references to the according evidence. We thereby hope that this manuscript will serve as a resource in the prevention and investigation of potentially biased potassium results.

Pseudohyperkalemia in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Prevalence, impact, and management challenges

The term pseudohyperkalemia refers to a false elevation in serum potassium levels due to potassium release from cells in vitro. Falsely elevated potassium levels have been reported in patients with thrombocytosis, leukocytosis, and hematologic malignancies. This phenomenon has been particularly described in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Leukocyte fragility, extremely high leukocyte counts, mechanical stress, higher cell membrane permeability related to an interaction with lithium heparin in plasma blood samples, and metabolite depletion due to a high leukocyte burden have been reported to contribute to pseudohyperkalemia in CLL. The prevalence of pseudohyperkalemia is up to 40%, particularly in the presence of a high leukocyte count (>50 × 109/L). The diagnosis of pseudohyperkalemia is often overlooked, which may result in unnecessary and potentially harmful treatment. The use of whole blood testing and point-of-care blood gas analysis, along with thorough clinical evaluation, may help differentiate between true and pseudohyperkalemic episodes.

A randomized study to compare oral potassium binders in the treatment of acute hyperkalemia

BACKGROUND

The KBindER (K⁺ Binders in Emergency Room and hospitalized patients) clinical trial is the first head-to-head evaluation of oral potassium binders (cation-exchange resins) for acute hyperkalemia therapy.

METHODS

Emergency room and hospitalized patients with a blood potassium level ≥ 5.5 mEq/L are randomized to one of four study groups: potassium binder drug (sodium polystyrene sulfonate, patiromer, or sodium zirconium cyclosilicate) or nonspecific laxative (polyethylene glycol). Exclusion criteria include recent bowel surgery, ileus, diabetic ketoacidosis, or anticipated dialysis treatment within 4 h of treatment drug. Primary endpoints include change in potassium level at 2 and 4 h after treatment drug. Length of hospital stay, next-morning potassium level, gastrointestinal side effects and palatability will also be analyzed. We are aiming for a final cohort of 80 patients with complete data endpoints (20 per group) for comparative statistics including multivariate adjustment for kidney function, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, metabolic acidosis, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor prescription, and treatment with other agents to lower potassium (insulin, albuterol, loop diuretics).

DISCUSSION

The findings from our study will inform decision-making guidelines on the role of oral potassium binders in the treatment of acute hyperkalemia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04585542 . Registered 14 October 2020.

Pseudohyperkalemia associated with essential thrombocytosis; a hint for better clinical practice

A 75-year-old man was admitted with a diagnosis of diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperkalemia. During the treatment, he developed refractory hyperkalemia. Following our review, diagnosis of pseudohyperkalaemia secondary to thrombocytosis was made. We report this case to remind the importance of clinical suspicion of this phenomenon to prevent its serious consequences.

Impact of Time Delay in the Analysis of Serum Ionized Calcium, Sodium, and Potassium

Introduction Delay in the analysis of serum electrolytes along with clot contact time can lead to difference in results significant enough to affect clinical decisions. This study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of time lag between centrifugation and analysis on levels of serum sodium, potassium, and ionized calcium in a tertiary level health care set up.

Materials and Methods In this cross-sectional study, 70 serum samples were analyzed for ionized calcium, sodium, and potassium under different conditions with respect to time lag and clot contact time. The analysis of ionized calcium was done on Eschweiler Combiline 2, a direct ion-selective electrode (ISE) analyzer. Serum sodium and potassium were analyzed on fully automated chemistry analyzer, which is an indirect ISE analyzer. The statistical analysis was done in IBM SPSS software version 21.

Results The results for intergroup comparison with different time lag and clot contact time between all the four groups for sodium, potassium, and ionized calcium were statistically significant, as obtained by application of Kruskal–Wallis test. There was consistent decrease in the concentration of sodium and ionized calcium, and an increase in serum potassium with increased delay in analysis and clot contact time.

Conclusion The accurate measurement of electrolytes is of paramount importance for the treatment and better prognosis of critically ill patients. This can be accomplished by better management of the preanalytical phase of analysis by maintaining a standard protocol in the laboratory and sample transportation.

Effects of Short-Term Potassium Chloride Supplementation in Patients with CKD

BACKGROUND

Observational studies suggest that adequate dietary potassium intake (90-120 mmol/day) may be renoprotective, but the effects of increasing dietary potassium and the risk of hyperkalemia are unknown.

METHODS

This is a prespecified analysis of the run-in phase of a clinical trial in which 191 patients (age 68±11 years, 74% males, 86% European ancestry, eGFR 31±9 ml/min per 1.73 m2, 83% renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, 38% diabetes) were treated with 40 mmol potassium chloride (KCl) per day for 2 weeks.

RESULTS

KCl supplementation significantly increased urinary potassium excretion (72±24 to 107±29 mmol/day), plasma potassium (4.3±0.5 to 4.7±0.6 mmol/L), and plasma aldosterone (281 [198-431] to 351 [241-494] ng/L), but had no significant effect on urinary sodium excretion, plasma renin, BP, eGFR, or albuminuria. Furthermore, KCl supplementation increased plasma chloride (104±3 to 105±4 mmol/L) and reduced plasma bicarbonate (24.5±3.4 to 23.7±3.5 mmol/L) and urine pH (all P<0.001), but did not change urinary ammonium excretion. In total, 21 participants (11%) developed hyperkalemia (plasma potassium 5.9±0.4 mmol/L). They were older and had higher baseline plasma potassium.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CKD stage G3b-4, increasing dietary potassium intake to recommended levels with potassium chloride supplementation raises plasma potassium by 0.4 mmol/L. This may result in hyperkalemia in older patients or those with higher baseline plasma potassium. Longer-term studies should address whether cardiorenal protection outweighs the risk of hyperkalemia.Clinical trial number: NCT03253172.

Evaluation and management of leukolysis-mediated pseudohyperkalemia in paediatric leukemic samples

Introduction

Leukolysis-related pseudohyperkalemia due to preanalytical procedures may lead to erroneous (or absence of) treatment based on an invalid lab test result. We aimed to obtain a leukocyte threshold above which leukolysis-related pseudohyperkalemia becomes clinical relevant. Secondly, temporal dynamics of treatment-induced leukocyte decrease were studied to allow tailored implementation of laboratory information system (LIS) decision rules based on the leukocyte threshold to avoid leukolysis-related pseudohyperkalemia.

Materials and methods

Potassium results of AU5811 routine chemistry (Beckman Coulter, Brea, California, USA) and iStat point of care (POC) (Abbott Diagnostics, Chicago, Illinois, USA) analysers were compared, the latter method being insensitive to leukolysis caused by pre-analytical procedures. Potassium results were combined with leukocyte counts obtained using a Cell-Dyn Sapphire haematology analyser (Abbott Diagnostics, Santa Clara, California, USA), resulting in 132 unique data triplets. Regression analysis was performed to establish a leukocyte threshold. The Reference Change Value (√2 x Z x √(CV_a² + CV_i²)) was used to calculate maximum allowable difference between routine analyser and POC potassium results (delta_max + 0.58 mmol/L). Temporal analysis on the treatment-induced leukocyte decrease was performed by plotting leukocyte counts in time for all patients above the threshold leukocyte count (N = 41).

Results

Established leukocyte threshold was 63 x10⁹/L. Temporal analysis showed leukocyte counts below the threshold within 8 days of treatment for all patients.

Conclusions

Based on performed analyses we were able to implement LIS decision rules to reduce pseudohyperkalemia due to preanalytical procedures. This implementation can contribute to a reduction in erroneous (or absence of) treatments in the clinic.

Hyperleukocytosis and Pseudohyperkalemia in a Patient With Severe SARS-COVID 19 Unmasks Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused significant morbidity and mortality in a vast majority of the patient population, especially those with malignancies. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common leukemia in adults and is often an indolent disease. High white blood cell counts greater than 120 k/cumm in chronic lymphocytic leukemia may be implicated in cases of COVID-19. Hyperleukocytosis leads to falsely elevated potassium levels due to cell fragility. Pseudohyperkalemia occurs when elevated potassium is present due to potassium movement out of cells during or after a blood sample is drawn. Pseudohyperkalemia may be suspected when elevated potassium is present in asymptomatic patients with no corresponding electrocardiogram findings. The authors present a case of hyperleukocytosis and pseudohyperkalemia in a patient whose COVID-19 infection unmasked CLL.

Pseudohyperkalemia and the Need for Imperative Caution With the Newly Introduced Potent Potassium Binders: Two Cases

Pseudohyperkalemia was first reported in 1955 by Hartmann and Mellinkoff, as a marked elevation of serum potassium in the absence of clinical evidence of electrolyte imbalance - simultaneous serum potassium exceeds plasma potassium by >0.4 mmol/L. We describe two patients with pseudohyperkalemia who inadvertently received inappropriate potassium binder therapy for weeks to months before the diagnosis of pseudohyperkalemia was entertained and subsequently confirmed. Potassium binders ultimately were promptly discontinued once the diagnosis of pseudohyperkalemia was confirmed. Physicians’ attention must be drawn to the availability of the new potent oral potassium binders, patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate. We strongly advocate for imperative caution with these new binders. Iatrogenic life-threatening hypokalemia remains a real concern and must be avoided. Our patients highlighted the importance of caution in the use of the newer potent potassium binders to mitigate against the causation of iatrogenic hypokalemia. Also as important is the observation that in the same patient, with changing clinical scenarios, a patient might exhibit true hyperkalemia that alternated with pseudohyperkalemia, the first of such a report.

Stability of Whole Blood Electrolyte Specimens at Room Temperature vs. Slushed Ice Conditions

BACKGROUND

Data on the stability of whole blood electrolytes is limited to small sample sizes. We sought to determine the stability of whole blood electrolytes under room temperature and slushed iced conditions in human patients at a major hospital center.

METHODS

Whole blood samples were obtained from 203 patients hospitalized for various pathophysiological conditions. Electrolyte concentrations of sodium, potassium [K+], ionized calcium, and chloride were measured at 5 different timepoints spanning 3 h. Samples were stored at room temperature (22-24 °C) or under slushed ice conditions (0.1-0.2 °C) before analysis.

RESULTS

Under both conditions, sodium, ionized calcium, and chloride did not show a measurable change up to 109 min compared to baseline; however, the mean increase in [K+] over 138 min of storage in slushed ice was 0.0032 (0.0021 [5th percentile] to 0.0047 [95th percentile]) mmol/L/min (adjusted R2 = 0.62, P < 0.001). Five percent of the specimens demonstrated a ≥0.3 mmol/L change in [K+] from baseline after 67 min of storage in slushed ice. In contrast, 1% of the specimens stored at room temperature showed the same change at the same timepoint.

CONCLUSIONS

Whole blood sodium, [K+], ionized calcium, and chloride concentrations remain stable for at least 109 min at room temperature. However, whole blood specimens stored in slushed ice for not more than 67 min exhibit a 5% probability that the [K+] concentration will increase by at least 0.3 mmol/L compared to baseline. The other analytes do not destabilize for up to 178 min of slushed ice storage.

Incidence, risk factors, and recognition of pseudohyperkalemia in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Pseudohyperkalemia, a false elevation of potassium level in vitro, can be observed in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients due to fragility of leukocytes along with a high leukocyte count. This retrospective, observational study included all patients diagnosed with CLL at our hospital who had at least one leukocyte count ≥ 50.0 × 10⁹/L during the years 2008-2018. All hyperkalemic episodes (including when leukocyte count was below 50.0 × 10⁹/L) during this period were assessed. Pseudohyperkalemia was defined as when a normal potassium level was measured in a repeated blood test or when known risk factors and ECG changes typical of hyperkalemia were absent. Of the 119 episodes of hyperkalemia observed, 41.2% were considered as pseudohyperkalemia. Pseudohyperkalemia episodes were characterized by significantly higher leukocyte counts as well as higher potassium and LDH levels compared to true hyperkalemia. Pseudohyperkalemia was documented in medical charts only in a minority of cases (n = 4, 8.1%). Treatment was administered in 17 of 49 (34.7%) cases and caused significant hypokalemia in 6 of those cases. The incidence of pseudohyperkalemia in this study was rather high, suggesting that physicians should be more aware of this phenomenon in patients with CLL.

Alternating and Concurrent True Hyperkalemia and Pseudohyperkalemia in Adult Sickle Cell Disease

Sickle cell disease (SCD) predisposes the patient to recurrent episodes of acute painful hemolytic crisis. Sickle cell nephropathy (SCN) is not uncommon in adult patients, and renal manifestations of SCN include renal ischemia, microinfarcts, renal papillary necrosis, and renal tubular abnormalities with variable clinical presentations. Intravascular hemolysis and reduced glomerular filtration rate with renal tubular dysfunction predispose to true hyperkalemia. Hemolytic crisis can be complicated by sepsis, leading to significant degrees of thrombocytosis, and thrombocytosis is a well-defined cause of pseudohyperkalemia. We describe a 40-year-old African American male patient with sickle cell anemia who exhibited alternating episodes of true hyperkalemia and pseudohyperkalemia, during consecutive hospital admissions. Clearly, true hyperkalemia is a potentially lethal condition. At the same time, the institution of inappropriate and intensive treatment of pseudohyperkalemia leading to severe hypokalemia is also potentially lethal. The need for this caution is most imperative with the recent introduction of the safer and more potent potassium binders, patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate.

Clinical Management of Hyperkalemia

Hyperkalemia is an electrolyte abnormality with potentially life-threatening consequences. Despite various guidelines, no universally accepted consensus exists on best practices for hyperkalemia monitoring, with variations in precise potassium (K⁺) concentration thresholds or for the management of acute or chronic hyperkalemia. Based on the available evidence, this review identifies several critical issues and unmet needs with regard to the management of hyperkalemia. Real-world studies are needed for a better understanding of the prevalence of hyperkalemia outside the clinical trial setting. There is a need to improve effective management of hyperkalemia, including classification and K⁺ monitoring, when to reinitiate previously discontinued renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor (RAASi) therapy, and when to use oral K⁺-binding agents. Monitoring serum K⁺ should be individualized; however, increased frequency of monitoring should be considered for patients with chronic kidney disease, diabetes, heart failure, or a history of hyperkalemia and for those receiving RAASi therapy. Recent clinical studies suggest that the newer K⁺ binders (patiromer sorbitex calcium and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate) may facilitate optimization of RAASi therapy. Enhancing the knowledge of primary care physicians and internists with respect to the safety profiles of these newer K⁺ binders may increase confidence in managing patients with hyperkalemia. Lastly, the availability of newer K⁺-binding agents requires further study to establish whether stringent dietary K⁺ restrictions are needed in patients receiving K⁺-binder therapy. Individualized monitoring of serum K⁺ among patients with an increased risk of hyperkalemia and the use of newer K⁺-binding agents may allow for optimization of RAASi therapy and more effective management of hyperkalemia.

Pseudohyperkalemia caused by essential thrombocythemia in a patient with chronic renal failure: A case report

BACKGROUND

Hyperkalemia is one of the most common complications of chronic renal failure. Pseudohyperkalemia is caused by elevated levels of serum potassium in vitro and is usually accompanied by thrombocythemia. Although an elevated level of potassium is typically correlated with impaired renal function, pseudo-hyperkalemia has been rarely reported in patients with chronic renal failure. Here, we conducted a review of the literature to study the case of pseudo-hyperkalemia caused by the essential thrombocythemia in a patient with chronic renal failure.

CASE SUMMARY

A 73-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital with complaints of palpitation, dyspnea, and acratia for 2 d and a history of essential throm-bocythemia for 1 year. The routine blood test showed platelet count of 1460 × 10⁹/L, and biochemistry tests showed that the patient suffered from hyperkalemia (potassium: 7.50 mmol/L) and renal failure (estimated glomerular filtration rate: 8.88 mL/min). Initial treatment included medicines to lower her potassium-levels and hemodialysis. However, the therapy did not affect her serum potassium levels. Plasma potassium concentration measurements and a history of essential thrombocythemia established the diagnosis of pseudohyperkalemia. The treatments of the platelet disorder gradually normalized serum potassium levels; however, the treatments had to be discontinued later due to the severe leukopenia, and enhanced levels of serum potassium concentrations were observable in the patient. Since plasma sampling was not permitted, doctors had to use a diuretic just in case. Finally, the patient collapsed into unconsciousness and died due to multiple organ dysfunction and electrolyte disturbance.

CONCLUSION

We reviewed the literature and suggest that serum and plasma potassium values should both be measured for patients whose platelet counts exceed 500 × 10⁹/L to eliminate chances of pseudohyperkalemia, especially for those with chronic renal failure. An inappropriate treatment for pseudohyperkalemia can aggravate a patient's condition.

The potential role of the eGFR in differentiating between true and pseudohyperkalaemia

BACKGROUND

Differentiating between true and pseudohyperkalaemia is essential for patient management. The common causes of pseudohyperkalaemia include haemolysis, blood cell dyscrasias and EDTA contamination. One approach to differentiate between them is by checking the renal function, as it is believed that true hyperkalaemia is rare with normal function. This is logical, but there is limited published evidence to support it. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential role of the estimated glomerular filtration rate in differentiating true from pseudohyperkalaemia.

METHODS

GP serum potassium results >6.0 mmol/L from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2017, with a repeat within seven days, were included. Entries were retrospectively classified as true or pseudohyperkalaemia based on the potassium reference change value and reference interval. If the initial sample had a full blood count, it was classified as normal/abnormal to remove blood cell dyscrasias. Different estimated glomerular filtration rate cut-points were used to determine the potential in differentiating true from pseudohyperkalaemia.

RESULTS

A total of 272 patients were included with potassium results >6.0 mmol/L, with 145 classified as pseudohyperkalaemia. At an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 90 ml/min/1.73 m², the negative predictive value was 81% (95% CI: 67-90%); this increased to 86% (95% CI: 66-95%) by removing patients with abnormal full blood counts. When only patients with an initial potassium ≥6.5 mmol/L were included (regardless of full blood count), at an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 90 ml/min/1.73 m², the negative predictive value was 100%. Lower negative predictive values were seen with decreasing estimated glomerular filtration rate cut-points.

CONCLUSION

Normal renal function was not associated with true hyperkalaemia, making the estimated glomerular filtration rate a useful tool in predicting true from pseudohyperkalaemia, especially for potassium results ≥6.5 mmol/L.

A method comparison study of a point-of-care blood gas analyser with a laboratory auto-analyser for the determination of potassium concentrations during hyperkalaemia in patients with kidney disease

Introduction

Hyperkalaemia is a common electrolyte disorder that may cause life-threatening cardiac arrythmias. We aimed to determine the agreement of potassium concentrations between GEM premier 3500 point-of-care blood gas analyser (POC-BGA) and Roche Cobas 6000 c501 auto-analyser in patients with hyperkalaemia.

Methods

A prospective, cross-sectional study of all consecutive adult patients referred to the Renal Unit with a serum potassium concentration ≥ 5.5 mmol/L was performed. A total of 59 paired venous blood samples were included in the final statistical analysis. Passing-Bablok regression and Bland Altman analysis were used to compare the two methods.

Results

The median laboratory auto-analyser potassium concentration was 6.1 (5.9-7.1) mmol/L as compared to the POC-BGA potassium concentration of 5.7 (5.5-6.8) mmol/L with a mean difference of - 0.43 mmol/L and 95% upper and lower limits of agreement of 0.35 mmol/L and - 1.21 mmol/L, respectively. Regression analysis revealed proportional systematic error. Test for linearity did not indicate significant deviation (P = 0.297).

Conclusion

Although regression analysis indicated proportional systematic error, on Bland Altman analysis, the mean difference appeared to remain relatively constant across the potassium range that was evaluated. Therefore, in patients presenting to the emergency department with a clinical suspicion of hyperkalaemia, POC-BGA potassium concentrations may be considered a surrogate for laboratory auto-analyser measurements once clinicians have been cautioned about this difference.

A case of severe pseudohyperkalaemia due to muscle contraction

Introduction

Severe hyperkalaemia is a serious medical condition requiring immediate medical attention. Before medical treatment is started, pseudohyperkalaemia has to be ruled out.

Case description

A 10-month old infant presented to the emergency department with fever and coughing since 1 week. Routine venous blood testing revealed a severe hyperkalaemia of 6.9 mmol/L without any indication of haemolysis. Reanalysis of the plasma sample confirmed the hyperkalaemia (7.1 mmol/L). Based on these results, the clinical pathologist suggested to perform a venous blood gas analysis and electrocardiogram (ECG) which revealed a normal potassium of 3.7 mmol/L and normal ECG, ruling out a potentially life-treating hyperkalaemia. The child was diagnosed with pneumonia. The paediatrician had difficulty to perform the first venous blood collection due to excessive movement of the infant during venipuncture. The muscle contractions of the child in combination with venous stasis most probably led to a local increase of potassium in the sampled limbs. The second sample collected under optimal preanalytical circumstances had a normal potassium. Since muscle contraction typically does not cause severe hyperkalaemia, other causes of pseudohyperkalaemia were excluded. K₃-EDTA contamination and familial hyperkalaemia were ruled out and the patient did not have extreme leucocytosis or thrombocytosis. By exclusion a diagnosis of pseudohyperkalaemia due to intense muscle movement and venous stasis was made.

Conclusion

This case suggests that intense muscle contraction and venous stasis can cause severe pseudohyperkalemia without hemolysis. Once true hyperkalemia has been ruled out, a laboratory work-up can help identify the cause of pseudohyperkalaemia.

Reverse pseudohyperkalemia and pseudohyponatremia in a patient with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma

OBJECTIVES

Investigate concomitant and spurious high potassium and low sodium results in heparinized plasma.

METHODS

Potassium and sodium values were measured from heparinized plasma and serum in a patient with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma using both an automated chemistry analyzer (indirect ion selective electrode) and blood gas analyzer (direct ion selective electrode).

RESULTS

Potassium levels were significantly increased while sodium levels were significantly decreased in heparinized plasma compared to serum on several occasions.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, concomitant reverse pseudohyperkalemia and pseudohyponatremia has not been reported previously. We postulate the discrepancy between plasma and serum sodium (pseudohyponatremia in plasma) may be unique to cases of reverse pseudohyperkalemia with extreme potassium elevations.

Data-driven quality assurance to prevent erroneous test results

Increasing laboratory automation and efficiency requires quality assurance (QA) approaches to ensure that reported results are precise and accurate. Prerequisites for designing optimal QA strategies include an in-depth understanding of the laboratory processes, the expected results, and of the mechanisms that can cause erroneous results. Oftentimes, a laboratory's own data, extracted from the laboratory information system, electronic medical record, and/or clinical data warehouse are necessary to master the aforementioned requirements. Data-driven QA utilizes retrospective and/or prospective laboratory results to minimize errors in the clinical laboratory due to pre-analytical or analytical vulnerabilities. Additionally, exploitation of this data may improve result interpretation. The objective of this review is to illustrate specific examples of data-driven QA approaches for several areas of the clinical laboratory and for different phases of the testing cycle.

Managing hemolyzed samples in clinical laboratories

Hemolysis is conventionally defined as membrane disruption of red blood cells and other blood cells that is accompanied by subsequent release of intracellular components into the serum or plasma. It accounts for over 60% of blood sample rejections in the laboratory and is the most common preanalytical error in laboratory medicine. Hemolysis can occur both in vivo and in vitro. Intravascular hemolysis (in vivo) is always associated with an underlying pathological condition or disease, and thus careful steps should always be taken by the laboratory to exclude in vivo hemolysis with confidence. In vitro hemolysis, on the other hand, is highly preventable. It may occur at all stages of the preanalytical phase (i.e. sample collection, transport, handling and storage), and may lead to clinically relevant, yet spurious, changes in patient results by interfering with laboratory measurements. Hemolysis interference is exerted through several mechanisms: (1) spectrophotometric interference, (2) release of intracellular components, (3) sample dilution and (4) chemical interference. The degree of interference observed depends on the level of hemolysis and also on the assay methodology. Recent evidence shows that preanalytical practices related to detection and management of hemolyzed samples are highly heterogeneous and need to be standardized. The Working Group for Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE) of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) has published many recommendations for facilitating standardization and improvement of this important preanalytical issue. Some key EFLM WG-PRE publications related to hemolysis involve: (i) a call for more transparency and some practical recommendations for improving the harmonization of the automatic assessment of serum indices and their clinical usefulness, specifically the hemolysis index (H-index), (ii) recommendations on how to manage local quality assurance of serum or plasma hemolysis/icterus/lipemia-indices (HIL-indices) and (iii) recommendations on how to detect and manage hemolyzed samples in clinical chemistry testing. In this review we provide a comprehensive overview of hemolysis, including its causes and effects on clinical laboratory assays. Furthermore, we list and discuss the most recent recommendations aimed at managing hemolyzed samples in everyday practice. Given the high prevalence of hemolyzed blood samples, the associated costs, the great heterogeneity in how hemolysis is handled across healthcare settings, countries and continents, and increasing patient cross-border mobility, standardization and quality improvement processes aimed at combatting this important preanalytical problem are clearly warranted.

Sample management for clinical biochemistry assays: Are serum and plasma interchangeable specimens?

The constrained economic context leads laboratories to centralize their routine analyses on high-throughput platforms, to which blood collection tubes are sent from peripheral sampling sites that are sometimes distantly located. Providing biochemistry results as quickly as possible implies to consolidate the maximum number of tests on a minimum number of blood collection tubes, mainly serum tubes and/or tubes with anticoagulants. However, depending on the parameters and their pre-analytical conditions, the type of matrix - serum or plasma - may have a significant impact on results, which is often unknown or underestimated in clinical practice. Importantly, the matrix-related effects may be a limit to the consolidation of analyses on a single tube, and thus must be known by laboratory professionals. The purpose of the present critical review is to put forward the main differences between using serum and plasma samples on clinical biochemistry analyses, in order to sensitize laboratory managers to the need for standardization. To enrich the debate, we also provide an additional comparison of serum and plasma concentrations for approximately 30 biochemistry parameters. Properties, advantages, and disadvantages of serum and plasma are discussed from a pre-analytical standpoint - before, during, and after centrifugation - with an emphasis on the importance of temperature, delay, and transport conditions. Then, differences in results between these matrices are addressed for many classes of biochemistry markers, particularly proteins, enzymes, electrolytes, lipids, circulating nucleic acids, metabolomics markers, and therapeutic drugs. Finally, important key-points are proposed to help others choose the best sample matrix and guarantee quality of clinical biochemistry assays. Moreover, awareness of the implications of using serum and plasma samples on various parameters assayed in the laboratory is an important requirement to ensure reliable results and improve patient care.

Evidence-Based Validation of Hemolysis Index Thresholds by Use of Retrospective Clinical Data

Background

Semiquantitative hemolysis indices (HIs) are used by chemistry analyzers to measure sample integrity, but there is little standardization in HI reporting or validation of analyte-specific HI flagging. Additional methods of HI threshold validation are needed.

Methods

We retrospectively queried serum and plasma potassium measurements, HIs, and contemporaneous whole blood potassium measurements. Serum and plasma values were compared to whole blood values drawn within 6 h (n = 6422 pairs), and discrepancies between values were compared across HIs. We also retrieved orders of potassium-lowering medications occurring shortly after release of potassium results from hemolyzed samples.

Results

While nonhemolyzed samples showed high agreement, a significant percentage of released hemolyzed samples (36.1% of the most hemolyzed group) were discrepant by 1 mEq/L or more. In total, 15.5% of patients with an order from the hyperkalemia order set had the order after a hemolyzed value; the majority of those patients (42 of 46; 91.3%) received a potassium-lowering medication, most of whom did not have a redraw before drug administration.

Conclusions

Retrospective review of discrepancies identified marked inconsistencies among higher HI samples and identified opportunities for improving the laboratory reporting policy, offering a clinical validation of the HI thresholds for potassium. Clinicians generally treated patients with hemolyzed samples, underscoring the importance of maintaining sample quality.

A decade of RNA virus metagenomics is (not) enough

It is hard to overemphasize the role that metagenomics has had on our recent understanding of RNA virus diversity. Metagenomics in the 21st century has brought with it an explosion in the number of RNA virus species, genera, and families far exceeding that following the discovery of the microscope in the 18th century for eukaryotic life or culture media in the 19th century for bacteriology or the 20th century for virology. When the definition of success in organism discovery is measured by sequence diversity and evolutionary distance, RNA viruses win. This review explores the history of RNA virus metagenomics, reasons for the successes so far in RNA virus metagenomics, and methodological concerns. In addition, the review briefly covers clinical metagenomics and environmental metagenomics and highlights some of the critical accomplishments that have defined the fast pace of RNA virus discoveries in recent years. Slightly more than a decade in, the field is exhausted from its discoveries but knows that there is yet even more out there to be found.

Pseudohyperkalemia - Potassium released from cells due to clotting and centrifugation - a case report

Hyperkalemia is a potentially lethal condition. Pseudohyperkalemia should be always excluded before implementing treatment to prevent inappropriate cause of hypokalemia – equally a potentially lethal condition. Here we present a case report of a 62 year female with chronic myeloproliferative disorder, i.e. essential thrombocythemia. The laboratory test results for potassium concentration were 6.3 mmol/L, for platelet count 1305 x10⁹/L and for leukocyte count 39.8 x10⁹/L. This was due to a temporary drug withdrawal after a surgical intervention for gastric bleeding. Potassium concentration in lithium heparin plasma collected in a vacuum tube without gel separator and in whole blood syringe were 4.6 mmol/L and 3.4 mmol/L, respectively. It means that mechanical stress such as centrifugation can contribute to spurious hyperkalemia.
Prior to reporting unexpected hyperkalemia result, pseudohyperkalemia should always be considered by the laboratory. Such potassium results require investigation in case it is pseudohyperkalemia, which may be due to thrombocytosis and leukocytosis. In cases where thrombocytosis or leukocytosis exists, an interpretative comment indicating these conditions inserted with the results of the potassium concentration can increase awareness for more accurate patient care decisions.