Traceability of immunosuppressant's mass concentration results obtained using different commercial calibrators

Establishing metrological traceability for small molecule measurands in laboratory medicine

For molecules that can be well described metrologically in the sense of the definition of measurands, and which can also be recorded analytically as individual substances, reference measurement service traceability to a metrologically sound foundation is a necessity. The establishment of traceability chains must be initiated by National Metrology Institutes (NMIs) according to applicable standards; they are at the top and leading position in this concept. If NMIs are not in the position to take up this task, alternative approaches must be sought. Traceability initiatives established by in vitro device industry or academia must meet the quality standards of NMIs. Adherence to International Organization for Standardization (ISO) procedure 15193 must be a matter of course for the establishment of reference measurement procedures (RMPs). Certified reference material (CRM) characterization must be thorough, e.g., by the application of quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance measurements and by adherence to ISO 15194. Both for RMPs and CRMs Joint Committee for Traceability in Laboratory Medicine (JCTLM) listing must be the ultimate goal. Results must be shared in a transparent manner to allow other stakeholders including NMIs to reproduce and disseminate the reference measurement procedures.

Immunosuppressant Monitoring-Performance of the First Mass Spectrometry-Based Automated Clinical Analyzer Cascadion

BACKGROUND

Automatic analyzers simplify processes and may help improve standardization. The first automated analyzer based on mass spectrometry is available and offers a panel for monitoring cyclosporin A, tacrolimus, sirolimus, and everolimus. Method comparisons and evaluation tests are presented to verify the capability of the Cascadion system for use in a clinical laboratory.

METHODS

Sample preparation and measurements were performed using the Cascadion clinical analyzer. More than 1000 measurement values of patient samples were compared with an in vitro diagnostic-certified assay run on a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry instrument. Precision and accuracy were determined using commercial quality control and external quality assessment (EQA) samples.

RESULTS

A good correlation between the 2 instruments was observed (Pearson correlation r = 0.956-0.996). Deming regression revealed 95% confidence intervals of slopes and intercepts covering the values 1 and 0, for sirolimus and everolimus, respectively, indicating equivalence of both measuring systems. However, for cyclosporin A, a bias was observed and confirmed using a Bland-Altman plot (-9.1%). Measurement repeatability and intermediate measurement precision were appropriate showing coefficients of variation of 0.9%-6.1% and 2.0%-5.3%, respectively. Accuracy according to internal quality controls was 85%-111% and 81%-100% in the EQA samples of Reference Institute of Bioanalytics and Laboratory of the Government Chemist, respectively. High robustness was found with regard to the linearity of the calibration lines (linear regression coefficient r2 > 0.99). Carryover was negligible (0.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

The Cascadion automatic analyzer produced convincing results in the measurement of patient, control, and EQA samples. The throughput was sufficient for routine use. Overall, it can be used as an alternative to open liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry instruments for immunosuppressant monitoring, simplifying processes without the need for specially trained personnel.

After another decade: LC-MS/MS became routine in clinical diagnostics

Tandem mass spectrometry - especially in combination with liquid chromatography (LC-MS/MS) - is applied in a multitude of important diagnostic niches of laboratory medicine. It is unquestioned in its routine use and is often unreplaceable by alternative technologies. This overview illustrates the development in the past decade (2009-2019) and intends to provide insight into the current standing and future directions of the field. The instrumentation matured significantly, the applications are well understood, and the in vitro diagnostics (IVD) industry is shaping the market by providing assay kits, certified instruments, and the first laboratory automated LC-MS/MS instruments as an analytical core. In many settings the application of LC-MS/MS is still burdensome with locally lab developed test (LDT) designs relying on highly specialized staff. The current routine applications cover a wide range of analytes in therapeutic drug monitoring, endocrinology including newborn screening, and toxicology. The tasks that remain to be mastered are, for example, the quantification of proteins by means of LC-MS/MS and the transition from targeted to untargeted omics approaches relying on pattern recognition/pattern discrimination as a key technology for the establishment of diagnostic decisions.

An isotope dilution LC-MS/MS based candidate reference method for the quantification of cyclosporine A, tacrolimus, sirolimus and everolimus in human whole blood

An isotope dilution LC-MS/MS based candidate reference measurement procedure for the quantification of cyclosporine A, tacrolimus, sirolimus and everolimus in human whole blood is presented to be used for evaluation and standardization of routine assays applied for therapeutic drug monitoring. The assay allows baseline separation of the four immunosuppressive drugs within a total runtime of 9 minutes using a C4 reversed phase column. Sample preparation is based on protein precipitation with zinc sulphate followed by purification with solid phase extraction. Reference materials used in this reference measurement procedure were characterized by qNMR and an absolute content of analytes calculated to guarantee traceability to SI units. As internal standards the corresponding deuterated and ¹³C-labelled analytes were used. The method allows the measurement of cyclosporine A in the range of 5 ng/mL to 2100 ng/mL; tacrolimus, sirolimus and everolimus were analysed in the range of 0.25 ng/mL to 50 ng/mL. Imprecision for inter-day measurements were found to be ≤3.5% for cyclosporine A and ≤4.4% for tacrolimus, sirolimus and everolimus. Accuracy was found to be within 101% and 108% for cyclosporine A and between 95% and 104% for the macrolide compounds. The uncertainty was evaluated according to the GUM. Expanded measurement uncertainties were found to be ≤7.2% for cyclosporine A, ≤6.8% for tacrolimus, ≤9.0% for sirolimus and ≤8.9% for everolimus (k = 2).