A comparison of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and spike antibody detection using three commercially available automated immunoassays

Safety and antibody response of the BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in children aged 5-11 years with underlying diseases: A prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Data on the safety and antibody response of the BNT162b2 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA vaccine in children aged 5-11 years with underlying diseases are limited. Thus, our study aimed to address this gap.

METHODS

This prospective observational study investigated the antibody titers for SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor-binding domain (S-IgG) and nucleocapsid protein (N-IgG) in patients aged 5-11 years with chronic underlying diseases following two doses of BNT162b2. Additionally, a questionnaire was used to assess adverse events (AEs) arising within 7 days after each dose. Data on severe AEs arising within 28 days after each dose were extracted from the patients' electronic medical records.

RESULTS

Among 122 patients, 24.6% (30/122) were immunocompromised. Furthermore, 79 patients experienced at least one AE following vaccination, but all recovered without sequelae, including one severe case after the first dose. The seropositivity rate after the second dose was 99.1% (116/117). Excluding 19 N-IgG-positive patients, the geometric mean antibody titer (GMT) was significantly higher in immunocompetent patients than in immunocompromised patients (1496 U/mL [95% confidence interval 1199-1862] vs. 472 U/mL [200-1119], p = 0.035). Additionally, the GMT of S-IgG was higher in N-IgG-positive patients than in N-IgG-negative patients (8203 [5847-11482] U/mL vs. 1127 [855-1486] U/mL, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

BNT162b2 is acceptably safe and immunogenic for children aged 5-11 years with underlying diseases. Although seroconversion was satisfactory in immunocompromised patients, the titers were lower than in immunocompetent patients.

Advances in nanobiosensors during the COVID-19 pandemic and future perspectives for the post-COVID era

The unprecedented threat of the highly contagious virus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which causes exponentially increased infections of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), highlights the weak spots of the current diagnostic toolbox. In the midst of catastrophe, nanobiosensors offer a new opportunity as an alternative tool to fill a gap among molecular tests, rapid antigen tests, and serological tests. Nanobiosensors surpass the potential of antigen tests because of their enhanced sensitivity, thus enabling us to see antigens as stable and easy-to-access targets. During the first three years of the COVID-19 pandemic, a substantial number of studies have reported nanobiosensors for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigens. The number of articles on nanobiosensors and SARS-CoV-2 exceeds the amount of nanobiosensor research on detecting previous infectious diseases, from influenza to SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. This unprecedented publishing pace also implies the significance of SARS-CoV-2 and the present pandemic. In this review, 158 studies reporting nanobiosensors for detecting SARS-CoV-2 antigens are collected to discuss the current challenges of nanobiosensors using the criteria of point-of-care (POC) diagnostics along with COVID-specific issues. These advances and lessons during the pandemic pave the way for preparing for the post-COVID era and potential upcoming infectious diseases.

Ruxolitinib treatment in myelofibrosis and polycythemia vera causes suboptimal humoral immune response following standard and booster vaccination with BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine

Patients affected by myelofibrosis (MF) or polycythemia vera (PV) and treated with ruxolitinib are at high risk for severe coronavirus disease 2019. Now a vaccine against the virus SARS-CoV-2, which is responsible for this disease, is available. However, sensitivity to vaccines is usually lower in these patients. Moreover, fragile patients were not included in large trials investigating the efficacy of vaccines. Thus, little is known about the efficacy of this approach in this group of patients. In this prospective single-center study, we evaluated 43 patients (30 MF patients and 13 with PV) receiving ruxolitinib as a treatment for their myeloproliferative disease. We measured anti-spike and anti-nucleocapsid IgG against SARS-CoV2 15-30 days after the second and the third BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine booster dose. Patients receiving ruxolitinib showed an impaired antibody response to complete vaccination (2 doses), as 32.5% of patients did not develop any response. After the third booster dose with Comirnaty, results slightly improved, as 80% of these patients produced antibodies above the threshold positivity. However, the quantity of produced antibodies was well below that reached than those reported for healthy individuals. PV patients elicited a better response than patients affected by MF. Thus, different strategies should be considered for this high-risk group of patients.

Assessment of Immunogenic and Antigenic Properties of Recombinant Nucleocapsid Proteins of Five SARS-CoV-2 Variants in a Mouse Model

COVID-19 cases caused by new variants of highly mutable SARS-CoV-2 continue to be identified worldwide. Effective control of the spread of new variants can be achieved through targeting of conserved viral epitopes. In this regard, the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N) protein, which is much more conserved than the evolutionarily influenced spike protein (S), is a suitable antigen. The recombinant N protein can be considered not only as a screening antigen but also as a basis for the development of next-generation COVID-19 vaccines, but little is known about induction of antibodies against the N protein via different SARS-CoV-2 variants. In addition, it is important to understand how antibodies produced against the antigen of one variant can react with the N proteins of other variants. Here, we used recombinant N proteins from five SARS-CoV-2 strains to investigate their immunogenicity and antigenicity in a mouse model and to obtain and characterize a panel of hybridoma-derived monoclonal anti-N antibodies. We also analyzed the variable epitopes of the N protein that are potentially involved in differential recognition of antiviral antibodies. These results will further deepen our knowledge of the cross-reactivity of the humoral immune response in COVID-19.

Sensitivity of the Elecsys Nucleocapsid Assay for the Detection of Preceding SARS-CoV-2 Infections

Nucleocapsid serological assay sensitivity to identify severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections among vaccinees and for Omicron cases is unclear. In this prospective study, the Elecsys nucleocapsid assay was 89% sensitive in identifying SARS-CoV-2 infections 14-607 days pre-blood collection. Sensitivity was similar when comparing by vaccination status, and in Omicron (vs pre-Omicron) cases.

Limited Correlation between SARS-CoV-2 Serologic Assays for Identification of High-Titer COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma Using FDA Thresholds

In August 2020, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) specified 12 authorized serologic assays and associated assay-specific cutoff values for the selection of high-titer CCP for use in hospitalized patients. The criteria used for establishing these cutoff values remains unclear. Here, we compare the overall agreement and concordance of five serologic assays included in the August 2020 FDA EUA at both the manufacturer-recommended qualitative cutoff thresholds and at the FDA-indicated thresholds for high-titer CCP, using serum samples collected as part of the CCP Expanded Access Program (EAP). The qualitative positive percent agreement (PPA) across assays ranged from 92.3% to 98.8%. However, the high-titer categorization across assays varied significantly, with the PPA ranging from 26.5% to 82.7%. The Roche anti-NC ECLIA provided the lowest agreement compared to all other assays. Efforts to optimize high-titer cutoffs could reduce, although not eliminate, the discordance across assays. The consequences of using nonstandardized assays are apparent in our study, and the high-titer cutoffs chosen for each assay are not directly comparable to each other. The generalized findings in our study will be relevant to any future use of convalescent plasma for either COVID-19 or future pandemics of newly emerged pathogens.

IMPORTANCE COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) was one of the first therapeutic options available for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infections and continues to be used selectively for immunosuppressed patients. Given the emergence of novel SARS-CoV-2 variants which are resistant to treatment with available monoclonal antibody (MAb) therapy, CCP remains an important therapeutic consideration. The FDA has released several emergency use authorizations (EUA) that have specified which serological assays can be used for qualification of CCP, as well as assay-specific cutoffs that must be used to identify high-titer CCP. In this study, a cohort of donor CCP was assessed across multiple serological assays which received FDA EUA for qualification of CCP. This study indicates a high degree of discordance across the assays used to qualify CCP for clinical use, which may have precluded the optimal use of CCP, including during clinical trials. This study highlights the need for assay standardization early in the development of serological assays for emerging pathogens.

Observational Study of Receptor Binding Domain Spike Antibody Responses to 3 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccinations in Noninfected Subjects: Parallel Neutralizing Antibody and Cardiac Troponin I and T Observations

Background

Our goals were to demonstrate receptor binding domain spike 1 (RBD S1) protein antibody (Ab) kinetic responses to multiple vaccines over approximately 180 days, neutralizing Ab effectiveness, and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) and T (hs-cTnT) responses in postvaccinated, non-SARS-CoV-2–infected subjects.

Methods

Blood specimens were collected pre- and postvaccinations from seronegative subjects. RDB S1 Abs were measured by the novel Qorvo Biotechnologies Omnia platform. Neutralizing Abs and hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT were measured on the ET Healthcare Pylon 3D.

Results

Two-dose vaccines (Pfizer, Moderna) had peak RBD S1 Ab concentrations about 45 to 55 days after both doses and showed declines over the next 50 to 70 days. The Janssen vaccine showed lower RBD S1 Ab peak concentrations, continued to increase over time, and plateaued after 60 days. There was strong neutralizing Ab response post vaccinations, with only 3 specimens, shortly before and shortly after vaccination, not showing a response. Specimens showed no hs-cTnI (all < 3 ng/L) and hs-cTnT (all < 6 ng/L) increases or changes over time.

Conclusions

We demonstrate in seronegative SARS-CoV-2 subjects that Pfizer and Moderna vaccinations provide strong, neutralizing RBD S1 Ab effectiveness, based on 2 different assays after 2 doses, with the Janssen single-dose vaccine showing a lower RBD S1 Ab response over 4 to 6 months. No myocardial injury was associated with the Pfizer postvaccination. The Qorvo Biotechnologies RBD S1 Ab assay measured on the Omnia platform has potential as a point-of-care platform.

Evaluation of Three Quantitative Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Immunoassays

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged in December 2019 and caused a dramatic pandemic. Serological assays are used to check for immunization and assess herd immunity. We evaluated commercially available assays designed to quantify antibodies directed to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S) antigen, either total (Wantaï SARS-CoV-2 Ab ELISA) or IgG (SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant on Alinity, Abbott, and Liaison SARS-CoV-2 TrimericS IgG, Diasorin). The specificities of the Wantaï, Alinity, and Liaison assays were evaluated using 100 prepandemic sera and were 98, 99, and 97%, respectively. The sensitivities of all three were around 100% when tested on 35 samples taken 15 to 35 days postinfection. They were less sensitive for 150 sera from late infections (>180 days). Using the first WHO international standard (NIBSC), we showed that the Wantai results were concordant with the NIBSC values, while Liaison and Alinity showed a proportional bias of 1.3 and 7, respectively. The results of the 3 immunoassays were significantly globally pairwise correlated and for late infection sera (P < 0.001). They were correlated for recent infection sera measured with Alinity and Liaison (P < 0.001). However, the Wantai results of recent infections were not correlated with those from Alinity or Liaison. All the immunoassay results were significantly correlated with the neutralizing antibody titers obtained using a live virus neutralization assay with the B1.160 SARS-CoV-2 strain. These assays will be useful once the protective anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titer has been determined.

IMPORTANCE Standardization and correlation with virus neutralization assays are critical points to compare the performance of serological assays designed to quantify anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in order to identify their optimal use. We have evaluated three serological immunoassays based on the virus spike antigen that detect anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies: a microplate assay and two chemiluminescent assays performed with Alinity (Abbott) and Liaison (Diasorin) analysers. We used an in-house live virus neutralization assay and the first WHO international standard to assess the comparison. This study could be useful to determine guidelines on the use of serological results to manage vaccination and treatment with convalescent plasma or monoclonal antibodies.