Resolving inconsistencies in defining the target orientation for the acetabular cup angles in total hip arthroplasty

Functional assessment of component positioning in patients with groin pain after total hip arthroplasty as a tool to guide management

BACKGROUND

Persisting groin pain post total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common and complex issue that can be difficult to diagnose and manage. Acetabular component positioning is often implicated.

AIMS AND METHODS

We used a previously well described and validated functional positioning protocol to determine if functional acetabular malpositioning was a factor in groin pain post THA and hence to determine if acetabular revision would be indicated. We compared patient-specific functional acetabular positioning to traditional CT evaluation of cup position and assessment of anterior cup overhang.

RESULTS

39 patients with groin pain post-THA were investigated. Functional acetabular malpositioning was diagnosed in 31% (12/39). Revision THA was performed in those 12 patients, resulting in resolution of functional malpositioning (100%), with an overall accuracy of 5.6° (range 1-12), and resolution of groin pain in 67% (8/12). 33% (4/12) of the revised implants had functional positioning located outside the traditional "40/20 zone". Comparison with CT indicated that 40% (4/10) of implants with anterior overhang were well positioned, however only 50% (6/12) of functionally malpositioned implants had CT evidence of anterior cup prominence. Of the 8/12 revision patients who had resolution of their groin pain, only 1 had cup prominence.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that the utilisation of a patient specific functional positioning algorithm in the analysis of persistent groin pain following THA can assist in identifying the underlying cause of pain and help to guide treatment. For a functionally malpositioned acetabulum, revision surgery offers a potential resolution of groin pain.

How the hip-spine relationship influences total hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Motion in the spine, pelvis and hips which make up the spinopelvic femoral complex (SPFC) implies mechanical relationships that help maintain trunk balance and optimize hip functionThe aim of this study was to understand the physiology of the SPFC and evaluate the dysfunctions of the SPFC and their implications for total hip arthroplasty considering the hip-spine relationship.

METHODS

A review of relevant and comprehensive studies on this subject is reported in order to highlight a pathophysiology that integrates the description of the evaluations of the spine-pelvic and hip parameters and recommendations for the kinematic planning of the THA procedure. The primary objective was to determine which type of hip-spine relationship has the highest risk for THA complications and to become proficient in selecting the priority surgical intervention when both the hip and spine are affected. Finally, this review attempted to assist hip surgeons with surgical technique, tools, implant selection, and goals of planning a THA that requires personalized kinematic alignment. Determine the influence of THA on these kinematics and the effect of stiffness of the lumbopelvic complex on the risk of THA failure.

RESULTS

When a person sits, the pelvis goes into retroversion and the acetabulum opens forward. This frees the femoral head and neck to allow hip flexion. The opposite - pelvic anteversion - occurs when a person stands. When pelvic mobility is limited, the hip must increase its range of motion to accommodate these posture changes. Disturbances in spinal and pelvic kinematics lead to abnormal hip function, which may contribute to complications following total hip arthroplasty (THA).

CONCLUSION

A precise evaluation of the parameters governing the SPFC must be taken into account in order to best optimize the placement and choice of THA implants.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

The efficacy of patient specific instrumentation (PSI) in total hip arthroplasty (THA): A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) has been suggested to reduce improper component positioning, though the effectiveness of PSI in total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains inconclusive. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiographic parameters and clinical outcomes comparing PSI and standard instrumentation (SI).

Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the 2020 PRISMA statement and was registered on PROSPERO. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for relevant studies pertaining to the use of PSI in THA. Inclusion criteria included PSI used in THA, PSI was directly compared to SI, and publication in English. Exclusion criteria included non-primary THA, review articles, abstracts, book chapters, and animal models.

Results

2,458 studies were initially identified, with 13 studies (677 THAs: 338 controls, 339 PSI) meeting all criteria. PSI was favored for the deviation from the preoperative plan for acetabular cup position for anteversion (p = 0.04) and inclination (p = 0.0002); risk of acetabular cup positioning outside the Lewinnek safe zone for anteversion (p = 0.005) and inclination (p < 0.0001); and postoperative Harris Hip Score (p = 0.0002). No significant differences were found for the deviation from the preoperative plan for femoral stem position for anteversion (p = 0.74) or varus/valgus (p = 0.15); intraoperative time (p = 0.55); or intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.62).

Conclusion

The use of PSI in THA is effective in improving acetabular component positioning and postoperative functional outcomes, without increasing intraoperative time or blood loss, compared to SI.

Anthropometric Measurement About the Safe Zone for Transacetabular Screw Placement in Total Hip Arthroplasty in Asian Middle-Aged Women: In Vivo Three-Dimensional Model Analysis

BACKGROUND

Although the pelvic vascular injury caused by a transacetabular screw is rare, it is a major local complication of total hip arthroplasty. We aimed to obtain anthropometric data about the safe zone for the placement of transacetabular screws by analyzing the three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction model and determine the safe length of transacetabular screws by performing the 3D simulated surgery.

METHODS

We reviewed 50 hips of 25 patients who underwent lower extremity angiographic computed tomography scans retrospectively. We reconstructed the 3D models of 50 hips with normal pelvic bone and vascular status using the customized computer software. We measured the central angle and safe depth of the safe zone of the transacetabular screws on the 3D models. We also performed the 3D simulated surgery to confirm the safe length of screws in each hole of the customized cup implant.

RESULTS

The measured central angle of the posterior-superior area was 79.5°. And we determined a mean safe depth of 49.8 mm in the safe zone, with a central angle of 47.7°. During the 3D simulated surgery, we determined a mean safe length of the transacetabular screw of 43.3 mm when applied to a lateral hole on a line bisecting the posterior-superior area.

CONCLUSION

Although our study was limited by the use of a virtual computer program, the quantitative measurements obtained can help reduce the incidence of pelvic vascular injury during transacetabular screw fixation in total hip arthroplasty.

The Impingement-free, Prosthesis-specific, and Anatomy-adjusted Combined Target Zone for Component Positioning in THA Depends on Design and Implantation Parameters of both Components

BACKGROUND

Lewinnek's recommendation for orienting the cup in THA is criticized because it involves a static assessment of the safe zone and because it does not consider stem geometry. A revised concept of the safe zone should consider those factors, but to our knowledge, this has not been assessed.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) To determine the shape, size, and location of target zones for combined cup and stem orientation for a straight stem/hemispheric cup THA to maximize the impingement-free ROM and (2) To determine whether and how these implant positions change as stem anteversion, neck-shaft angle, prosthetic head size and target range of movements are varied.

METHODS

A three-dimensional computer-assisted design model, in which design geometry was expressed in terms of parameters, of a straight stem/hemispheric cup hip prosthesis was designed, its design parameters modified systematically, and each prosthesis model was implanted virtually at predefined component orientations. Functional component orientation referencing to body planes was used: cups were abducted from 20° to 70°, and anteverted from -10° to 40°. Stems were rotated from -10° to 40° anteversion, neck-shaft angles varied from 115° to 143°, and head sizes varied from 28 to 40 mm. Hip movements up to the point of prosthetic impingement were tested, including simple flexion/extension, internal/external rotation, ab/adduction, combinations of these, and activities of daily living that were known to trigger dislocation. For each combination of parameters, the impingement-free combined target zone was determined. Maximizing the size of the combined target zone was the optimization criterion.

RESULTS

The combined target zones for impingement-free cup orientation had polygonal boundaries. Their size and position in the diagram changed with stem anteversion, neck-shaft angle, head size, and target ROM. The largest target zones were at neck-shaft angles from 125° to 127°, at stem anteversions from 10° to 20°, and at radiographic cup anteversions between 17° and 25°. Cup anteversion and stem anteversion were inverse-linearly correlated supporting the combined-anteversion concept. The range of impingement-free cup inclinations depended on head size, stem anteversion, and neck-shaft angle. For a 127°-neck-shaft angle, the lowest cup inclinations that fell within the target zone were 42° for the 28-mm and 35° for the 40-mm head. Cup anteversion and combined version depended on neck-shaft angle. For head size 32-mm cup, anteversion was 6° for a 115° neck-shaft angle and 25° for a 135°-neck-shaft angle, and combined version was 15° and 34° respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The shape, size, and location of the combined target zones were dependent on design and implantation parameters of both components. Changing the prosthesis design or changing implantation parameters also changed the combined target zone. A maximized combined target zone was found. It is mandatory to consider both components to determine the accurate impingement-free prosthetic ROM in THA.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study accurately defines the hypothetical impingement-free, design-specific component orientation in THA. Transforming it into clinical precision may be the case for navigation and/or robotics, but this is speculative, and as of now, unproven.

Hip stress distribution - Predictor of dislocation in hip arthroplasties. A retrospective study of 149 arthroplasties

Dislocation after hip arthroplasty is still a major concern. Recent study of the volumetric wear of the cup has suggested that stresses studied in a one-legged stance model could predispose arthroplasty dislocation. The aim of this work was to study whether biomechanical parameters of contact stress distribution in total hip arthroplasty during a neutral hip position can predict a higher possibility of the arthroplasty dislocating. Biomechanical parameters were determined using 3-dimensional mathematical models of the one-legged stance within the HIPSTRESS method. Geometrical parameters were measured from standard anteroposterior X-ray images of the pelvis and proximal femora. Fifty-five patients subjected to total hip arthroplasty that later suffered dislocation of the head and, for comparison, ninety-four total hip arthroplasties that were functional at least 10 years after the implantation, were included in the study. Arthroplasties that suffered dislocation had on average a 6% higher resultant hip force than the control group (p = 0.004), 11% higher peak stress on the load-bearing area (p = 0.001) and a 50% more laterally positioned stress pole (p = 0.026), all parameters being less favorable in the group of unstable arthroplasties. There was no statistically significant difference in the gradient index or in the functional angle of the weight bearing. Our study showed that arthroplasties that show a tendency to push the head out of the cup in the representative body position—the one-legged stance—are prone to dislocation. An unfavorable resultant hip force, peak stress on the load bearing and laterally positioned stress pole are predictors of arthroplasty dislocation.

Total hip arthroplasty planning

Preoperative planning is mandatory to achieve the restoration of a correct and personalized biomechanics of the hip.

The radiographic review is the first and fundamental step in the planning. Limb or pelvis malpositioning during the review results in mislead planning.

Correct templating is possible using three different methods: acetate templating on digital X-ray, digital 2D templating on digital X-ray and 3D digital templating on CT scan.

Time efficiency, costs, reproducibility and accuracy must be considered when comparing different templating methods. Based on these parameters, acetate templating should not be abandoned; digital templating allows a permanent record of planning and can be electronically viewed by different members of surgical team; 3D templating is intrinsically more accurate. There is no evidence in the few recently published studies that 3D templating impacts positively on clinical outcomes except in difficult cases.

The transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) is a reliable intraoperative soft tissue reference to set cup position.

Spine–hip relations in osteoarthritic patients undergoing hip joint replacement must be considered.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4:626-632. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180075

Trigonometric Algorithm Defining the True Three-Dimensional Acetabular Cup Orientation: Correlation Between Measured and Calculated Cup Orientation Angles

BACKGROUND

Acetabular cup orientation plays a key role in implant stability and the success of total hip arthroplasty. To date, the orientation has been measured with different imaging modalities and definitions, leading to lack of consensus on optimal cup placement. A 3-dimensional (3D) concept involving a trigonometric description enables unambiguous definitions. Our objective was to test the validity and reliability of a 3D trigonometric description of cup orientation.

METHODS

Computed tomographic scans of the pelvis, performed for vascular assessment of 20 patients with 22 primary total hip replacements in situ, were systematically collected. On multiplanar reconstructions, 3 observers independently measured cup orientation retrospectively in terms of coronal inclination, sagittal tilt, and transverse version. The angles measured in 2 planes were used to calculate the angle in the third plane via a trigonometric algorithm. For correlation and reliability analyses, intraobserver and interobserver differences between measured and calculated angles were evaluated with use of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

Measured and calculated angles had ICCs of 0.953 for coronal inclination, 0.985 for sagittal tilt, and 0.982 for transverse version. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability had ICCs of 0.987 and 0.987, respectively, for coronal inclination; 0.979 and 0.981, respectively, for sagittal tilt; and 0.992 and 0.978, respectively, for transverse version.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3D concept with its trigonometric algorithm is a valid and reliable tool for the measurement of cup orientation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

By calculating the transverse version of cups from coronal inclination and sagittal tilt measurements, the trigonometric algorithm enables a 3D definition of cup orientation, regardless of the imaging modality used. In addition, it introduces sagittal tilt that, like pelvic tilt, rotates around the transverse axis.

The Safe Zone Range for Cup Anteversion Is Narrower Than for Inclination in THA

BACKGROUND

Cup malposition is a common cause of impingement, limitation of ROM, acceleration of bearing wear, liner fracture, and instability in THA. Previous studies of the safe zone based on plain radiographs have limitations inherent to measuring angles from two-dimensional projections. The current study uses CT to measure component position in stable and unstable hips to assess the presence of a safe zone for cup position in THA.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Does acetabular component orientation, when measured on CT, differ in stable components and those revised for recurrent instability? (2) Do CT data support historic safe zone definitions for component orientation in THA?

METHODS

We identified 34 hips that had undergone revision of the acetabulum for recurrent instability that also had a CT scan of the pelvis between August 2003 and February 2017. We also identified 175 patients with stable hip replacements who also had a CT study for preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation of the contralateral side. For each CT study, one observer analyzed major factors including acetabular orientation, femoral anteversion, combined anteversion (the sum of femoral and anatomic anteversion), pelvic tilt, total offset difference, head diameter, age, sex, and body mass index. These measures were then compared among stable hips, hips with cup revision for anterior instability, and hips with cup revision for posterior instability. We used a clinically relevant measurement of operative anteversion and inclination as opposed to the historic use of radiographic anteversion and inclination. The percentage of unstable hips in the historic Lewinnek safe zone was calculated, and a new safe zone was proposed based on an area with no unstable hips.

RESULTS

Anteriorly unstable hips compared with stable hips had higher operative anteversion of the cup (44° ± 12° versus 31° ± 11°, respectively; mean difference, 13°; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5°-21°; p = 0.003), tilt-adjusted operative anteversion of the cup (40° ± 6° versus 26° ± 10°, respectively; mean difference, 14°; 95% CI, 10°-18°; p < 0.001), and combined tilt-adjusted anteversion of the cup (64° ± 10° versus 54° ± 19°, respectively; mean difference, 10°; 95% CI, 1°-19°; p = 0.028). Posteriorly unstable hips compared with stable hips had lower operative anteversion of the cup (19° ± 15° versus 31° ± 11°, respectively; mean difference, -12°; 95% CI, -5° to -18°; p = 0.001), tilt-adjusted operative anteversion of the cup (19° ± 13° versus 26° ± 10°, respectively; mean difference, -8°; 95% CI, -14° to -2°; p = 0.014), pelvic tilt (0° ± 6° versus 4° ± 6°, respectively; mean difference, -4°; 95% CI, -7° to -1°; p = 0.007), and anatomic cup anteversion (25° ± 18° versus 34° ± 12°, respectively; mean difference, -9°; 95% CI, -1° to -17°; p = 0.033). Thirty-two percent of the unstable hips were located in the Lewinnek safe zone (11 of 34; 10 posterior dislocations, one anterior dislocation). In addition, a safe zone with no unstable hips was identified within 43° ± 12° of operative inclination and 31° ± 8° of tilt-adjusted operative anteversion.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study supports the notion of a safe zone for acetabular component orientation based on CT. However, the results demonstrate that the historic Lewinnek safe zone is not a reliable predictor of future stability. Analysis of tilt-adjusted operative anteversion and operative inclination demonstrates a new safe zone where no hips were revised for recurrent instability that is narrower for tilt-adjusted operative anteversion than for operative inclination. Tilt-adjusted operative anteversion is significantly different between stable and unstable hips, and surgeons should therefore prioritize assessment of preoperative pelvic tilt and accurate placement in operative anteversion. With improvements in patient-specific cup orientation goals and acetabular component placement, further refinement of a safe zone with CT data may reduce the incidence of cup malposition and its associated complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

Current Concepts in Acetabular Positioning in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Being one of the most successful surgeries in the history of medicine, the indications for total hip arthroplasty have widened and are increasingly being offered to younger and fitter patients. This has also led to high expectations for longevity and outcomes. Acetabular cup position has a significant impact on the results of hip arthroplasty as it affects dislocation, abductor muscle strength, gait, limb lengths, impingement, noise generation, range of motion (ROM), wear, loosening, and cup failure. The variables in cup position are depth, height, and angular position (anteversion and inclination). The implications of change in depth of center of rotation (COR) are medialized versus anatomical positioning. As opposed to traditional medialization with beneficial effects on joint reaction force, the advantages of an anatomical position are increasingly recognized. The maintained acetabular offset offers advantages in terms of ROM, impingement, cortical rim press fit, and maintaining medial bone stock. The height of COR influences muscle activity and limb lengths and available bone stock for cup support. On the other hand, ideal angular position remains a matter of much debate and reliably achieving a target angular position remains elusive. This is not helped by variations in the way we describe angular position, with operative, radiologic, or anatomic definitions being used variably to describe anteversion and inclination. Furthermore, pelvic tilt plays a major role in functional positions of the acetabulum. In addition, commonly used techniques of positioning often do not inform us of the real orientation of the pelvis on operating table, with possibility of significant adduction, flexion, and external rotation of the pelvis being possibilities. This review article brings together the evidence on cup positioning and aims to provide a systematic and pragmatic approach in achieving the best position in individual cases.

Central X-ray beam correction of radiographic acetabular cup measurement after THA: an experimental study

PURPOSE

Accurate assessment of cup orientation on postoperative radiographs is essential for evaluating outcome after THA. However, accuracy is impeded by the deviation of the central X-ray beam in relation to the cup and the impossibility of measuring retroversion on standard pelvic radiographs.

METHOD

In an experimental trial, we built an artificial cup holder enabling the setting of different angles of anatomical anteversion and inclination. Twelve different cup orientations were investigated by three examiners. After comparing the two methods for radiographic measurement of the cup position developed by Lewinnek and Widmer, we showed how to differentiate between anteversion and retroversion in each cup position by using a second plane. To show the effect of the central beam offset on the cup, we X-rayed a defined cup position using a multidirectional central beam offset. According to Murray's definition of anteversion and inclination, we created a novel corrective procedure to balance measurement errors caused by deviation of the central beam.

RESULTS

Measurement of the 12 different cup positions with the Lewinnek's method yielded a mean deviation of [Formula: see text] (95 % CI 1.3-2.3) from the original cup anteversion. The respective deviation with the Widmer/Liaw's method was [Formula: see text] (95 % CI 2.4-4.0). In each case, retroversion could be differentiated from anteversion with a second radiograph. Because of the multidirectional central beam offset ([Formula: see text] cm) from the acetabular cup in the cup holder ([Formula: see text] anteversion and [Formula: see text] inclination), the mean absolute difference for anteversion was [Formula: see text] (range [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] (range [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] for inclination. The application of our novel mathematical correction of the central beam offset reduced deviation to a mean difference of [Formula: see text] for anteversion and [Formula: see text] for inclination.

CONCLUSION

This novel calculation for central beam offset correction enables highly accurate measurement of the cup position.

Radiographic Evaluation of Hip Dislocations Necessitating Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

Although prosthetic hip dislocation is a common reason for revision arthroplasty, few studies have comprehensively evaluated the radiographic factors that may lead to the need for revision. Therefore, the authors radiographically evaluated all prosthetic hip dislocations that were treated at one institution. They then specifically assessed those that required revision surgery. The authors found that the prosthetic center of rotation (pCOR) was located superolateral and inferolateral to the native COR (nCOR) in all patients. Most hips had pCOR distances more than 5 mm from the nCOR. Furthermore, most patients had cup inclination and anteversion angles within Lewinnek's previously defined "safe zone." Determining these similarities and properly planning these procedures may help decrease the instability rate and therefore improve the overall success of this procedure. [Orthopedics.2016; 39(5):e1011-e1018.].

The impact of standard combined anteversion definitions on gait and clinical outcome within one year after total hip arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Different target areas within the concept of combined cup and stem anteversion have been published for total hip arthroplasty (THA). We asked whether component positioning according to eight standard combined anteversion rules is associated with (1) more physiological gait patterns, (2) higher improvement of gait variables and (3) better clinical outcome after THA.

METHODS

In a prospective clinical study, 60 patients received cementless THA through an anterolateral MIS approach in a lateral decubitus position. Six weeks postoperatively, implant position was analysed using 3D-CT by an independent external institute. Preoperatively, six and 12 months postoperatively range of motion, normalized walking speed and hip flexion symmetry index were measured using 3D motion-capture gait analysis. Patient-related outcome measures (HHS, HOOS, EQ-5D) were obtained by an observer blinded to 3D-CT results. Eight combined anteversion definitions and Lewinnek's "safe zone" were evaluated regarding their impact on gait patterns and clinical outcome.

RESULTS

Combined cup and stem anteversion according to standard combined anteversion definitions as well as cup placement within Lewinnek's "safe zone" did not influence range of motion, normalized walking speed and/or hip flexion symmetry index six and 12 months after THA. Similarly, increase of gait parameters within the first year after THA was comparable between all eight combined anteversion rules. Clinical outcome measures like HHS, HOOS and EQ-5D did not show any benefit for either of the combined anteversion definitions.

CONCLUSIONS

Standard combined cup and stem anteversion rules do not improve postoperative outcome as measured by gait analysis and clinical scores within one year after THA.

Standing or supine x-rays after total hip replacement - when is the safe zone not safe?

An acetabular prosthesis orientated outside the 'safe zone' is one of the key contributing factors in increasing complications after total hip replacement (THR). Although acetabular orientation is routinely assessed using supine x-rays, standing x-rays have been proposed because a change in body position alters pelvic tilt and therefore acetabular orientation. This study aimed to assess whether acetabular components orientated within the 'safe zone' in supine can also be outside the 'safe zone' in standing. Thirty patients (12M, 18F) had lateral and antero-posterior pelvic x-rays taken in standing and supine positions six weeks post THR. Pelvic tilt and acetabular orientation (anteversion and inclination) were measured and compared with respect to the limits of the 'safe zone'. In standing, the pelvis was relatively posteriorly tilted and both acetabular anteversion and inclination increased (p<0.0001). In 16 patients the acetabulum was orientated within the 'safe zone' in supine but outside the 'safe zone' in standing. Patients were significantly more likely to be outside the 'safe zone' in standing than when supine (p<0.0001).

Effect of femoral neck modularity upon the prosthetic range of motion in total hip arthroplasty

In total hip arthroplasty, aseptic loosening and dislocation are associated with not being able to achieve the correct prosthetic component orientation. Femoral neck modularity has been proposed as a solution to this problem by allowing the surgeon to alter either the neck-shaft or version angle of the prosthetic femoral component intra-operatively. A single replicate full factorial design was used to evaluate how effective a modular femoral neck cementless stem was in restoring a healthy prosthetic range of motion in comparison with a leading fixed-neck cementless stem with the standard modular parameters. It was found that, if altered to a large enough degree, femoral neck modularity can increase the amount of prosthetic motion as well as alter its position to where it is required physiologically. However, there is a functional limit to the amount that can be corrected and there is a risk with regard to the surgeon having to select the optimum modular neck before any benefit is realised.

Comparison of acetabular shell position using patient specific instruments vs. standard surgical instruments: a randomized clinical trial

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) survivorship relies largely upon appropriate acetabular cup placement. The purpose of this prospective randomized controlled trial was to determine whether the use of a preoperative 3D planning software in combination with patient specific instrumentation (PSI) results in improved cup placement compared with traditional techniques. Thirty-six THA patients were randomized into standard (STD) or PSI technique. Standard approach was completed using traditional techniques, while PSI cases were planned and customized surgical instruments were manufactured. Postoperative CT scans were used to compare planned to actual results. Differences found between planned and actual anteversion were -0.2° ± 6.9° (PSI) and -6.9°±8.9° (STD) (P = 0.018). Use of 3D preoperative planning along with PSIs resulted in significantly greater anteversion accuracy than traditional planning and instrumentation.

A new technique for radiographic measurement of acetabular cup orientation

Accurate radiographic measurement of acetabular cup orientation is required in order to assess susceptibility to impingement, dislocation, and edge loading wear. In this study, the accuracy and precision of a new radiographic cup orientation measurement system were assessed and compared to those of two commercially available systems. Two types of resurfacing hip prostheses and an uncemented prosthesis were assessed. Radiographic images of each prosthesis were created with the cup set at different, known angles of version and inclination in a measurement jig. The new system was the most accurate and precise and could repeatedly measure version and inclination to within a fraction of a degree. In addition it has a facility to distinguish cup retroversion from anteversion on anteroposterior radiographs.

Research synthesis of recommended acetabular cup orientations for total hip arthroplasty

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is regarded as one of the most successful surgical procedures of modern times yet continues to be associated with a small but significant complication rate. Many early failures may be associated with poor component positioning with, in particular, acetabular component orientation dependent on the subjective judgement of the surgeon. In this paper, we compare the manufacturers' instructions on acetabular cup orientation with the literature-based recommended safety zones and surgical technique, by transforming them onto a single, clinically-relevant framework in which the different reference systems, safety guidelines and current instrumentation surgical techniques can be evaluated. The observed limited consensus between results reflects ongoing uncertainty regarding the optimum acetabular component positioning. As malpositioning of the acetabular cup increases the risk of revision surgery, any ambiguity over the correct position can have a causal effect. Our analysis highlights the need for a surgical reference system which can be used to describe the position of the acetabular cup intra-operatively.

A novel method for accurate and reproducible functional cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty

Cup positioning is an important variable for short and long term function, stability, and durability of total hip arthroplasty (THA). This novel method utilizes internal and external bony landmarks, and the transverse acetabular ligament for positioning the acetabular component. The cup is placed parallel and superior to the transverse ligament and inside the anterior wall notch of the true acetabulum, then adjusted for femoral version and pelvic tilt and obliquity based on weight bearing radiographs. In 78 consecutive THAs, the mean functional anteversion and abduction angles were 17.9° ± 4.7° and 41.7° ± 3.8°, respectively. 96% of the functional anteversion measurements and 100% of the functional abduction angles were within the safe zone. This technique is an easy, reproducible, and accurate method for functional cup placement.

Intra- and extra-articular planes of reference for use in total hip arthroplasty: a preliminary study

PURPOSE

Acetabular component malalignment in total hip arthroplasty can lead to potential complications such as dislocation, component impingement and excessive wear. Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery systems generally use the anterior pelvic plane (APP). Our aim was to investigate the reliability of anatomical landmarks accessible during surgery and to define new potential planes of reference.

METHODS

Three types of palpations were performed: virtual, on dry bones and on two cadaveric specimens. Four landmarks were selected, the reproducibility of their positioning ranging from 0.9 to 2.3 mm. We then defined five planes and tested them during palpations on two cadaveric specimens.

RESULTS

Two planes produced a mean orientation error of 5.0° [standard deviation (SD 3.3°)] and 5.6° (SD 2.7°).

CONCLUSIONS

Even if further studies are needed to test the reliability of such planes on a larger scale in vivo during surgery, these results demonstrated the feasibility of defining a new plane of reference as an alternative to the APP.

Validation of the femoral anteversion measurement method used in imageless navigation

Total hip arthroplasty restores lost mobility to patients suffering from osteoarthritis and acute trauma. In recent years, navigated surgery has been used to control prosthetic component placement. Furthermore, there has been increasing research on what constitutes correct placement. This has resulted in the definition of a safe-zone for acetabular cup orientation. However, there is less definition with regard to femoral anteversion and how it should be measured. This study assesses the validity of the femoral anteversion measurement method used in imageless navigation, with particular attention to how the neutral rotation of the femur is defined. CT and gait analysis methodologies are used to validate the reference which defines this neutral rotation, i.e., the ankle epicondyle piriformis (AEP) plane. The findings of this study indicate that the posterior condylar axis is a reliable reference for defining the neutral rotation of the femur. In imageless navigation, when these landmarks are not accessible, the AEP plane provides a useful surrogate to the condylar axis, providing a reliable baseline for femoral anteversion measurement.

Understanding acetabular cup orientation: the importance of convention and defining the safe zone

Understanding acetabular cup orientation is important in all aspects of total hip arthroplasty including preoperative planning, intraoperative positioning, and postoperative analysis. New concepts in ideal cup orientation such as 'combined anteversion' have emerged. Using computer navigation and three-dimensional imaging, the potential for accuracy and precision of implantation have improved. Nevertheless, the varying manner in which the terms "anteversion" and "abduction" are often used in the literature is indicative of a nebulous understanding of the complex spatial anatomy of acetabular cup orientation.

Automated extraction of the femoral anatomical axis for determining the intramedullary rod parameters in total knee arthroplasty

The automated extraction of anatomical reference parameters may improve speed, precision and accuracy of surgical procedures. In this study, an automated method for extracting the femoral anatomical axis (FAA) from a 3D surface mesh, based on geometrical entity fitting, is presented. This was applied to conventional total knee arthroplasty, which uses an intramedullary rod (FIR) to orient the femoral prosthesis with respect to the FAA. The orientation and entry point of a FIR with a length of 200 mm are automatically determined from the FAA, as it has been shown that errors in these parameters may lead to malalignment of the mechanical axis. Moreover, the effect of partially scanning the leg was investigated by creating reduced femur models and comparing the results with the full models. Precise measurements are obtained for 50 models by using a central and two outer parts, with lengths of 20 and 120 mm, which correspond to 58% of the mean femoral length. The deviations were less than 2 mm for the FAA, 2.8 mm for the FAA endpoints and 0.7° and 1.3 mm for the FIR orientation and entry point. The computer-based techniques might eventually be used for preoperative planning of total knee arthroplasty.

Components anteversion in primary cementless THA using straight stem and hemispherical cup: a prospective study in 91 hips using CT-scan measurements

BACKGROUND

The recommended range of anteversion of the components in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is between 10 and 30°, but the intraoperative estimation of these versions may be inadequate.

HYPOTHESIS

The components anteversion in primary cementless THA using straight stem and hemispherical cup is not significantly different from the native anteversion of the hip joint.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate in a prospective manner the range of anteversion currently achieved in cementless THA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Five senior surgeons operated 91 patients with primary cementless THA. We used a straight press fit stem and a hemispherical press fit cup. We aimed to obtain femoral anteversion of 10 to 30°, acetabular anteversion of 10 to 30° and a global combined anteversion of 25 to 55°. Cup position was checked with an impactor-positioner, and stem position was determined with the knee flexed 90°. In all cases we used elevated liners and 28 mm diameter ceramic heads. At 3 months postoperatively the component versions were measured using a General Electric LightSpeed Pro 16 (Milwaukee, Wi, USA) with the patient in supine position.

RESULTS

Femoral component measurements ranged from 17° of retroversion to 60° of anteversion with a mean of 23.0±11.8°. Similarly, acetabular component version ranged from 28° of retroversion to 46° of anteversion with a mean of 18.5±13.7°. There were no correlations to the native femoral and acetabular versions. Only 55 hips (60.4%) were within the accepted range of 25 to 55° of combined anteversion, but none of the cases dislocated during a follow-up of 2 years.

CONCLUSION

In cementless THA with our operative technique, the intraoperative estimation of femoral and acetabular anteversion, in many cases, resulted to be inadequate in relation to the intended range of 10 to 30° of anteversion.

A reliability study of measurement tools available on standard picture archiving and communication system workstations for the evaluation of hip radiographs following arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Conventional radiography is the primary imaging tool for routine follow-up of total hip replacements, but the reliability of this method has been questioned. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of commonly used measurements of the position of hip prostheses on postoperative radiographs with use of tools available on all standard picture archiving and communication system workstations.

METHODS

Fifty anteroposterior pelvic and lateral hip radiographs that were made after a unilateral total hip arthroplasty were included in this study. Acetabular inclination, lateral offset, lower-limb length, center of rotation, and femoral stem angle were independently assessed by two observers. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated for each measurement.

RESULTS

The results demonstrated excellent reliability for acetabular angle (r = 0.95), lower-limb length (r = 0.91), and lateral offset (r = 0.95) measurements and good reliability for center of rotation (r = 0.73) and lateral femoral stem angle (r = 0.68) measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

The position of total hip replacements can be reliably assessed with use of simple electronic tools and standard radiology workstations.

The reliability and variation of acetabular component anteversion measurements from cross-table lateral radiographs

Although cross-table lateral (CL) radiographs are frequently used to assess acetabular component anteversion, the reliability of this method has not been established. We compared serial CL radiographs with computed tomography (CT) scans for 98 total hip arthroplasty patients (119 hips) undergoing surveillance of primary or revision total hip arthroplasty. Acetabular anteversion averaged 26.1° (range, -2° to 48.3°) on CL imaging and 28.8° (range, -7° to 54°) on CT scan. There was a strong correlation between anteversion determined from CT scans and serial CL images. However, variation on serial CL studies exceeded 10° for 20% of patients. Although CL imaging provides acceptable assessment of general component position, it has limited use for precise analysis in research, outcome reporting, or determination of cause of implant failure.

Photographic measurement of the inclination of the acetabular component in total hip replacement using the posterior approach

The angle of inclination of the acetabular component in total hip replacement is a recognised contributing factor in dislocation and early wear. During non-navigated surgery, insertion of the acetabular component has traditionally been performed at an angle of 45 degrees relative to the sagittal plane as judged by the surgeon's eye, the operative inclination. Typically, the method used to assess inclination is the measurement made on the postoperative anteroposterior radiograph, the radiological inclination. The aim of this study was to measure the intra-operative angle of inclination of the acetabular component on 60 consecutive patients in the lateral decubitus position when using a posterior approach during total hip replacement. This was achieved by taking intra-operative photographs of the acetabular inserter, representing the acetabular axis, and a horizontal reference. The results were compared with the post-operative radiological inclination. The mean post-operative radiological inclination was 13 degrees greater than the photographed operative inclination, which was unexpectedly high. It appears that in the lateral decubitus position with a posterior approach, the uppermost hemipelvis adducts, thus reducing the apparent operative inclination. Surgeons using the posterior approach in lateral decubitus need to aim for a lower operative inclination than when operating with the patient supine in order to achieve an acceptable radiological inclination.

Cup anteversion in hip resurfacing: validation of EBRA and the presentation of a simple clinical grading system

The use of large metal on metal bearings has led to a reduction in the risk of dislocation post hip arthroplasty. Because of this, and also because of the technical difficulties associated with resurfacing surgery in particular, it could be argued that a less meticulous approach to acetabular cup placement has developed in comparison with conventional metal on polyethylene arthroplasty. Resurfacing cups may produce significant clinical problems when placed at the extremes of version, including increased production of metal debris and psoas tendonitis. Presented in this article is evidence that EBRA software (Einzel-Bild-Roentgen-Analysis, University of Innsbruck, Austria) can be used to reliably assess the version of resurfacing cups, when radiographs are of sufficient quality. The cups have characteristic appearances when placed at the extremes of version. These characteristics can allow the surgeon to identify poorly positioned cups without the use of software.

Optimal orientation of implanted components in total hip arthroplasty with polyethylene on metal articulation

BACKGROUND

In many studies related to the total hip arthroplasty, it has been found that incorrect alignment of the total hip component is one of the major factors influencing mechanical failures. Although various recommendations for cup orientation have been presented, there were few studies that seek to determine a proper orientation of the implants based on the human motion data. The objective of this study is to determine an optimum orientation of the hip implant considering various daily activities.

METHODS

Firstly, the cup orientations free of impingement were calculated for a given set of implant geometric parameters and the required range of motion for daily activities measured in 10 subjects. Next, the optimum values for the cup orientation and stem anteversion avoiding impingement and minimizing cup wear were determined for the proposed motion criteria.

FINDINGS

Different cup orientation was obtained as optimum for each combination of the neck angles (40 degrees and 50 degrees) and oscillation angles (120 degrees and 135 degrees). The corresponding optimum stem anteversion was also different when different neck angle was used.

INTERPRETATION

As the margin for the impingement-free orientation of the cup was small, the optimum cup orientation and stem anteversion should be adopted specific for each combination of the neck angle and oscillation angle.