The difference between stretching and splitting muscle trauma during THA seems not to play a dominant role in influencing periprosthetic BMD changes

Effect of implant composition on periprosthetic bone mineral density after total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The severity of bone mineral density (BMD) loss after total hip arthroplasty (THA) depends on both implant- and patient-related factors. While implant fixation type is an important factor, but few studies have considered the effect of material composition on the same implant fixation type. In particular, differences in mechanical stiffness due to material composition are of great interest. Here, we compared changes in periprosthetic BMD after THA using proximal fixation concept stems comprising different titanium alloys, i.e., β titanium alloys stem and α + β titanium alloys stem.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort included 122 patients (β titanium alloys stem, 61 cases; α + β titanium alloys stem, 61 cases) who underwent primary THA between January 2009 and December 2019. The primary outcome was the change in periprosthetic BMD from base line. Age, body mass index, diagnosis, stem size, canal flare index, surgical approach, pre-operative lumbar BMD, and pre-operative activity scores were reviewed and changes in periprosthetic BMD between the two groups were compared using analysis of covariance. The secondary outcome was radiographic response after THA.

RESULTS

There was significant difference in periprosthetic BMD in zone 6 and 7 at 2 years (p < 0.05) between the two groups. There was no significant difference in other zones. A significant difference in radiographic response was noted only for the Engh classification.

CONCLUSION

α + β titanium alloys stem resulted in a significantly higher rate of BMD loss in zones 6 and 7 compared with the β titanium alloys stem. These results may be due to differences in mechanical stiffness due to the different titanium alloy composition of the prosthetics.

"Anterolateral" approach to the hip: a systematic review of the correct definition of terms

PURPOSE

The Watson-Jones interval plane between tensor fascia lata (TFL) and the gluteus medius (GM) has come back into fashion in the past few years - Röttinger described the anterolateral minimal invasive approach (ALMI) for use in total hip replacement, in which the standard Watson-Jones interval was used, but with a completely intermuscular plane. However, the term anterolateral is often still utilised to describe intramuscular approaches in which the GM was violated, thus creating a potential misunderstanding in the literature. Accordingly, we have designed a study to answer the following questions: (1) are there articles in the recent literature that use the term "anterolateral" to describe different approaches; (2) which would be the correct description of the anterolateral approach?

METHODS

We did a systematic review of the literature based on PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, to look for peer reviewed papers of any evidence level focusing on the definition of anterolateral approach; MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched.

RESULTS

73 manuscripts met the criteria of the systematic search. 53 papers (72.6%) reported the term anterolateral approach to describe a complete intermuscular approach between the interval between GM and TFL. Nonetheless, in the remaining 20 papers (27.4%) the term anterolateral was used to describe intramuscular approaches in which the gluteus medius was violated.

CONCLUSION

In about 1 out of 4 papers in the recent literature, the term anterolateral was utilised to describe approaches that are completely different both in terms of anatomy and function.

Three dimensional bone mineral density changes in the femur over 1 year in primary total hip arthroplasty patients

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to compare the bone mineral density changes between unmatched patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty receiving uncemented and cemented type of implants. Previous studies have used DEXA or a two dimensional analysis to estimate the bone quality following total joint replacement, whereas this study presents the changes in three dimensions.

METHODS

Fifty subjects both male and females receiving both cemented and uncemented type of implant were recruited. Two CT scans were taken of each subject, the first at 24 h post surgery and the second one 1 year after surgery. The scans were calibrated using a phantom converting the Hounsfield units to bone mineral density values in g/cm³. The two scans were registered together using anatomical landmarks and resliced to compare the two femurs in the identical frame of reference. The bone density gain and loss was calculated by comparing density values between the two sets of scans.

FINDINGS

The results showed that most of the bone loss was located around the Lesser Trochanter and some bone density gain at the distal tip of the implant. The three dimensional density changes occur differently between individuals and the study showed no correlation of bone loss with age.

INTERPRETATION

The bone loss occurred mostly at the proximal femur, which is in agreement with previously presented studies. By carrying out three dimensional analysis on the bone gain and loss on the femur, it is possible to identify the patients that are showing high degree of bone loss.

A novel method for intraoperative osseomechanical strength measurements: a biomechanical ex vivo evaluation on proximal femora

INTRODUCTION

The increasing number of geriatric traumatology cases has intensified the need to reliably and objectively evaluate local bone quality, the latter poses a decisive factor for the choice of an optimal approach to treat osteoporotic fractures. Osteodensitometry imaging techniques are not routinely available in acute operative settings, nor do they provide objective information on local bone properties specifically needed for the prognosis of implant stability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study sought to verify ex vivo the feasibility and sensitivity of a novel method for the determination of local bone strength in the acute operative setting (intraoperative osseomechanical strength measurement; IOSM) that is based on the principle of material displacement resistance against the force of a rotary indenter. Samples consisted of human femoral heads obtained after total hip replacement. Comparisons were made with results obtained via conventional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and quantitative computed tomography (qCT).

RESULTS

Regression analyses of the results showed a highly significant correlation between the IOSM and the control methods (r = 0.61 and r = 0.56; p < 0.01), indicating that this new approach qualifies as a reliable tool for the intraoperative evaluation of the intrinsic local bone strength.

CONCLUSIONS

The intraoperative integration of this method may support surgeon on taking proper decisions in terms of optimal surgical approaches and prevention of complications inherent to osteoporotic bone.

Intraoperative complications in total hip arthroplasty using a new cementless femoral implant (SP-CL®)

BACKGROUND

Considering the excellent results already achieved in total hip arthroplasty (THA), new implants must be at least as safe as currently used implants and lead to longer survival. A new cementless femoral stem, SP-CL^®, has been introduced. The aim of this study is to evaluate intraoperative complications and assess the risk factors of THA with the SP-CL^® implant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All THA patients who were operated on using the SP-CL^® (LINK, Hamburg, Germany) implant between 2015 and 2018 were included in the analysis. Data were collected from medical records from national and hospital electronic databases. Radiological measurements were made from standard pre- and postoperative radiographs.

RESULTS

A total of 222 THA were performed using the SP-CL^® implant. The average age of the patients was 56 years (14-77 years). There were 1 transient sciatic nerve injury, 1 acetabular fracture, and 11 (5.0%) intraoperative femoral fractures (IFF), of which 7 were treated with cerclage wire or titanium band during the operation while the other fractures were treated conservatively. None of the IFF patients were revised due to fracture during the follow-up period (one revision due to infection). The radiographic morphology of proximal femur was associated with increased risk of IFF (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study demonstrate a 5% incidence of IFF when using the LINK SP-CL^® femoral stem in THA. The radiographic morphology of the proximal femur was an important predictor of IFF and should be assessed when using SP-CL^®.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4.

Anatomic grooved stem mitigates strain shielding compared to established total hip arthroplasty stem designs in finite-element models

Aseptic loosening remains a major problem for uncemented femoral components in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Ideally, bone adaptation after THA manifests minimally and local bone density reduction is widely avoided. Different design features may help to approximate initial, post-THA bone strain to levels pre-THA. Strain-shielding effects of different SP-CL stem design features are systematically analyzed and compared to CLS Spotorno and CORAIL using finite element models and physiological musculoskeletal loading conditions. All designs show substantial proximal strain-shielding: 50% reduced medial surface strain, 40–50% reduction at lateral surface, >120 µm/m root mean square error (RMSE) compared to intact bone in Gruen zone 1 and >60 µm/m RMSE in Gruen zones 2, 6, and 7. Geometrical changes (ribs, grooves, cross sections, stem length, anatomic curvature) have a considerable effect on strain-shielding; up to 20%. Combinations of reduced stem stiffness with larger proximal contact area (anatomically curved, grooves) lead to less strain-shielding compared to clinically established implant designs. We found that only the combination of a structurally flexible stem with anatomical curvature and grooves improves strain-shielding compared to other designs. The clinical implications in vivo of this initial strain-shielding difference are currently under evaluation in an ongoing clinical analysis.

Less periprosthetic bone loss following the anterolateral approach to the hip compared with the direct lateral approach

Background and purpose - The loss of bone mineral in the proximal femur following hip arthroplasty may increase the fracture risk around uncemented stems. We hypothesized that the surgical approach to the hip might influence bone mineral changes around the femoral stem in patients with a femoral neck fracture (FNF). Patients and methods - This was a pre-specified subgroup analysis (n = 51) of an ongoing randomized trial (n = 120) in patients with FNF. Participants were allocated to an uncemented hemiarthroplasty inserted through a direct lateral (Hardinge) approach or an anterolateral (modified Watson-Jones) approach. The 51 patients (mean age 83 (70-90) years, 33 women) were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to assess changes in periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD). Results - The mean change in total BMD differed between groups at 12 months in favor of the anterolateral group (4.8%, 95% CI 0.0-9.6; p = 0.05). DXA at 3 months displayed BMD loss in the proximal Gruen zones in the lateral group compared with the anterolateral group. Zone 1 (-5.0% vs. 2.7%), zone 2 (-4.3% vs. 4.1%), zone 6 (-6.5% vs. 0.0%) and zone 7 (-11% vs. -2.4%, all p < 0.05). Interpretation - DXA measurements in this study indicate that surgical approach to the hip influences periprosthetic BMD. Clinical implications remain uncertain. Our conclusions should be interpreted with caution as we did not perform adjustments for multiple tests, possibly leading to inflation of false-positive findings.

Strain shielding inspired re-design of proximal femoral stems for total hip arthroplasty

A large number of hip prosthesis with different designs have been developed. However, the influence of hip implant design changes on the strains induced in the bone remains unclear. The purpose of this study is to better understand the mechanics of short stem total hip arthroplasty. Specifically, it investigates whether strain shielding can be avoided by changing implant shape and/or material properties. It is hypothesized that the re-design of existing implant designs can result in further reduction of strain shielding and thus keep bone loss minimal following total hip replacement. Finite element methods were used to compare healthy and implanted models. The local mechanics strains/stresses in the intact and implanted femurs were determined under patient-specific muscle and joint contact forces. Results suggest that small changes in implant geometry and material properties have no major effect on strain shielding. Furthermore, it was found that improvement depends on a dramatic re-design of the original implant design. Whereas the benefit of this strategy of modification of the original geometry of a given short-stemmed hip consists in reduced bone remodeling, care should be taken with regard to long-term bone anchorage and implant fatigue strength. It is also shown that geometrical and material changes have a limited potential in avoiding strain shielding even in short-stemmed implants. Finally, it is suggested that an understanding of the influence of these changes on the strain distribution within the bone can guide in the process of optimizing the current stem designs toward minimal strain shielding effects. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:2534-2544, 2017.

Femoral head necrosis: A finite element analysis of common and novel surgical techniques

BACKGROUND

Femoral head necrosis is a common cause of secondary osteoarthritis. At the early stages, treatment strategies are normally based on core decompression techniques, where the number, location and diameter of the drilling holes varies depending on the selected approach. The purpose of this study was to investigate the risk of femoral head, neck and subtrochanteric fracture following six different core decompression techniques.

MATERIALS

Five common and a newly proposed techniques were analyzed in respect to their biomechanical consequences using finite element analysis. The geometry of a femur was reconstructed from computed-tomography images. Thereafter, the drilling configurations were simulated. The strains in the intact and drilled femurs were determined under physiological, patient-specific, muscle and joint contact forces.

FINDINGS

The following results were observed: i) - an increase in collapse and fracture risk of the femur head by disease progression ii) - for a single hole approach at the subtrochanteric region, the fracture risk increases with the diameter iii) - the highest fracture risks occur for an 8mm single hole drilling at the subtrochanteric region and approaches with multiple drilling at various entry points iv) - the proposed novel approach resulted in the most physiological strains (closer to the experienced by the healthy bone).

INTERPRETATION

Our results suggest that all common core decompression methods have a significant impact on the biomechanical competence of the proximal femur and impact its mechanical potential. Fracture risk increases with drilling diameter and multiple drilling with smaller diameter. We recommend the anterior approach due to its reduced soft tissue trauma and its biomechanical performance.

Machine learning techniques for the optimization of joint replacements: Application to a short-stem hip implant

Today, different implant designs exist in the market; however, there is not a clear understanding of which are the best implant design parameters to achieve mechanical optimal conditions. Therefore, the aim of this project was to investigate if the geometry of a commercial short stem hip prosthesis can be further optimized to reduce stress shielding effects and achieve better short-stemmed implant performance. To reach this aim, the potential of machine learning techniques combined with parametric Finite Element analysis was used. The selected implant geometrical parameters were: total stem length (L), thickness in the lateral (R1) and medial (R2) and the distance between the implant neck and the central stem surface (D). The results show that the total stem length was not the only parameter playing a role in stress shielding. An optimized implant should aim for a decreased stem length and a reduced length of the surface in contact with the bone. The two radiuses that characterize the stem width at the distal cross-section in contact with the bone were less influential in the reduction of stress shielding compared with the other two parameters; but they also play a role where thinner stems present better results.